Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2021; 27(32): 5424-5437
Published online Aug 28, 2021. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i32.5424
Prolonged survival in patients with hand-foot skin reaction secondary to cooperative sorafenib treatment
Masanori Ochi, Toshiro Kamoshida, Masahiro Araki, Tadashi Ikegami
Masanori Ochi, Toshiro Kamoshida, Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Ibaraki 317–0077, Japan
Masahiro Araki, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ibaraki Prefectural Central Hospital, Ibaraki Cancer Center, Ibaraki 309-1793, Japan
Tadashi Ikegami, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University Ibaraki Medical Center, Ibaraki 309-1793, Japan
Author contributions: Ochi M, Kamoshida T, Araki M, and Ikegami T contributed equally to this work; Ochi M and Kamoshida T collected and analyzed the data; Ochi M and Kamoshida T drafted the manuscript; Ochi M and Kamoshida T designed and supervised the study; Araki M and Ikegami T offered technical or material support; all authors have read and approved the final version to be published.
Institutional review board statement: The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of each hospital and was performed according to the ethical standards of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki.
Informed consent statement: Informed consent was obtained using an opt-out option on each facility’s website (see Institution website uniform resource locators).
Conflict-of-interest statement: None of the authors have any conflicts of interest related to the manuscript.
Data sharing statement: The original anonymous dataset is available on request from the corresponding author at maochi-tei@umin.ac.jp.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Masanori Ochi, MD, Doctor, Department of Gastroenterology, Hitachi General Hospital, Chome-1-1 Jonancho, Ibaraki 317–0077, Japan. maochi-tei@umin.ac.jp
Received: April 9, 2021
Peer-review started: April 9, 2021
First decision: May 27, 2021
Revised: June 22, 2021
Accepted: August 10, 2021
Article in press: August 10, 2021
Published online: August 28, 2021
Processing time: 137 Days and 20.5 Hours
ARTICLE HIGHLIGHTS
Research background

Although sorafenib prolongs overall survival (OS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the drug is associated with various adverse events (AEs) that may lead to permanent discontinuation.

Research motivation

The authors postulated that mutual cooperative intervention for AEs could improve OS in patients with HCC.

Research objectives

The aim of this study is to clarify the association between AE interventions and patient prognosis.

Research methods

The authors developed a mutual cooperation system that was initiated at the start of sorafenib treatment to manage AEs effectively. The system entailed pharmacist consultations during which patients were provided accurate information about sorafenib to alleviate fear and anxiety related to AEs. We stratified patients into three groups: Group A, patients without hand-foot skin reaction (HFSR) but with pharmacist intervention; Group B, patients with HFSR and pharmacist interventions unreported to oncologists (nonmutual cooperation system); and Group C, patients with HFSR and pharmacist interventions known to oncologists (mutual cooperation system).

Research results

The authors enrolled 134 patients (Group A, n = 41; Group B, n = 30; Group C, n = 63). The median OS significantly differed between Groups A and C (6.2 vs 13.9 mo, P < 0.01) but not between Groups A and B (6.2 vs 7.7 mo, P = 0.62). Group A vs Group C was an independent OS predictor (HR, 0.41; 95%CI: 0.25–0.66; P < 0.01). In Group B alone, the time to treatment failure (TTF) was significantly shorter, while the nonadherence rate was higher (P < 0.01). Additionally, Spearman’s rank correlation coefficients between OS and TTF in each group were 0.41 (Group A; P < 0.01), 0.13 (Group B; P = 0.51), and 0.58 (Group C; P < 0.01). There was a highly significant correlation between OS and TTF in Group C. However, there was no correlation between OS and TTF in Group B.

Research conclusions

The mutual cooperation system increased the treatment duration and improved the prognosis of patients with HFSR.

Research perspectives

Future prospective studies (e.g., randomized controlled trials) and improved adherence could help avoid OS underestimation.