Published online Dec 7, 2017. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i45.7978
Peer-review started: September 3, 2017
First decision: September 20, 2017
Revised: October 1, 2017
Accepted: November 1, 2017
Article in press: November 1, 2017
Published online: December 7, 2017
Processing time: 95 Days and 4.2 Hours
Recent studies have demonstrated that macrophages promote stem cell activity via paracrine action. Macrophages can express multi-phenotype and multi-functional roles in the liver and are a major source of both pro-proliferative and anti-proliferative mediators in liver pathology. There is little information available on the role of macrophage polarization in rescuing acute hepatic failure by mesenchymal stem cells.
Different macrophage phenotypes play various roles in tissue damage and maintenance. It is not clear whether M1 or M2 polarization contributes to the therapeutic effects of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). Macrophages to M1 or M2 polarization can increase infused MSCs activity during MSC transplantation, and improve the clinical efficacy of MSCs in the treatment of acute hepatic failure.
To investigate whether M1 or M2 polarization contributes to the therapeutic effects of MSCs.
The rats were divided into a survival group and a death group at 48 h after MSC treatment. The rats in the survival group were still in good physical condition at 48 h after MSC treatment. The rats in the death group were in poor physical condition or in the state of death before they died at 48 h after MSC treatment. The polarization of M1 and M2 was compared between the two groups. Macrophage polarization was analyzed by M1 markers [CD68, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-a), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), and inducible nitric oxide synthase (INOS)] and M2 markers [CD163, interleukin (IL)-4, IL-10, and arginase-1 (Arg-1)].
The number of CD163+ macrophages and levels of IL-4, IL-10, and Arg-1 were significantly up-regulated in the survival group. In contrast, CD68+ macrophages and levels of TFN-γ, TNF-α, and INOS were significantly up-regulated in the death group. However, a specific signaling pathway between macrophage polarization, associated cytokines, and hepatocyte regeneration has not been examined to date.
This study demonstrates that expression of hepatic progenitor surface marker (EpCAM) is the key to improving the prognosis of AHF. We detected macrophage polarization by cell markers and related cytokines. M2 macrophages play a crucial role in the prognosis of AHF, which results in altered levels of anti-inflammatory and pro-inflammatory factors. The mechanism by which M2 macrophages participate in activation of infused MSCs remains unclear. The observed differential effects of M1 and M2 macrophages suggest that M2 polarization may provide a potential therapeutic application in AHF after MSC transplantation.
M2 macrophages and their associated cytokines can contribute to AHF rescuing by MSCs. It is unclear whether M2 related cytokines originate from the liver or from the implanted MSCs. Further localization studies and relevant cell experiments are needed to confirm the results.