Published online Jul 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.117924
Revised: January 30, 2026
Accepted: March 23, 2026
Published online: July 14, 2026
Processing time: 191 Days and 7 Hours
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) and effectively reduces local recurrence; however, its sur
To evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of radiotherapy-free neoadjuvant sintilimab plus chemotherapy in resectable LARC.
This multicenter, single-arm phase II trial enrolled patients with resectable LARC. Participants received 2-4 cycles of neoadjuvant sintilimab combined with XELOX, followed by total mesorectal excision. Patients with radiotherapy-mandating high-risk features were not the primary target population. Pathological response and safety were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression was used to explore predictors of major pathological response (MPR), and multiplex immunofluorescence was performed to evaluate tumor immune microenvironmental features.
A total of 41 patients underwent surgery, and all achieved R0 resection. The pathological complete response was observed in 11 patients (26.8%), and MPR was in 19 patients (46.3%). The objective response rates was 85.4%. T-stage and N-stage downstaging occurred in 41.5% of patients, with concurrent TN downstaging in 26.8%. Treat
Radiotherapy-free neoadjuvant sintilimab plus XELOX shows promising pathological responses and manageable toxicity in selected patients with LARC.
Core Tip: This phase II single-arm study evaluated a radiotherapy-free neoadjuvant strategy using sintilimab plus XELOX in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer without mesorectal fascia involvement. The regimen achieved favorable pathological responses with acceptable toxicity. Tumor size > 4 cm and elevated baseline carcinoembryonic antigen levels were associated with a lower likelihood of major pathological response. Exploratory immune microenvironment analysis suggested a potential association between CD8+ T-cell infiltration and treatment response. These findings support further investigation of radiotherapy-sparing strategies in carefully selected patients.