Published online Jun 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i21.115964
Revised: December 16, 2025
Accepted: March 20, 2026
Published online: June 7, 2026
Processing time: 207 Days and 17.1 Hours
Hepatitis D virus (HDV) infection accelerates liver disease progression in individuals with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, yet its true burden in India remains unclear. HDV depends on HBV for replication and is associated with rapid fibrosis, early cirrhosis, and increased hepatocellular carcinoma risk, making accurate prevalence estimates essential for clinical management and public health planning in endemic settings.
To estimate the pooled prevalence of HDV among hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive individuals in India and assess regional and methodological variations to inform national hepatitis control strategies.
We systematically searched PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from inception to December 31, 2024 for studies reporting HDV prevalence in HBsAg-positive individuals in India, using laboratory-confirmed diagnosis. Eligible cross-sectional, cohort, or case-control studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Pooled prevalence was calculated using a random-effects generalized linear mixed model with logit transformation. Heterogeneity was quantified with I2 statistics, and publication bias was assessed by funnel plot inspection, Begg’s, and Egger’s tests.
Thirty studies, comprising a total of 5365 HBsAg-positive participants from multiple regions in India, met inclusion criteria. The pooled HDV prevalence was 5.05% (95% confidence interval: 2.37-10.41; I2 = 93.5%, P < 0.0001), with reported rates ranging from 0% to 91.7%. Heterogeneity appeared related to study setting, population risk profile, diagnostic method, and geographic location. Begg’s test showed no significant asymmetry (P = 0.57), while Egger’s test indicated possible small-study effects (P = 0.006).
HDV co-infection affects approximately 5% of HBV carriers in India, representing a significant public health concern. Routine HDV screening, prioritization of high-burden regions, expansion of diagnostic capacity, and sustained HBV vaccination coverage are critical to reducing disease impact. Regional and population-based variation demands urgent implementation of standardized HDV testing protocols and targeted public health interventions in high-burden areas.
Core Tip: This systematic review and meta-analysis provides the first comprehensive national estimate of hepatitis D virus (HDV) prevalence among hepatitis B surface antigen-positive individuals in India. Analyzing 30 studies with 5365 participants, the pooled HDV prevalence was 5.05%, highlighting substantial regional and methodological variability. The study identifies key drivers of heterogeneity, including diagnostic methods and population risk profiles, and underscores the urgent need for routine HDV screening, standardized testing protocols, and region-specific public health interventions to mitigate the burden of hepatitis B virus-HDV co-infection in India.