Cocca S, Casoni Pattacini G, Grova A, Esposito S, Lupo M, Ferrante M, Grande G, Guidotti C, Pigò F, Li Cavoli TV, Mussetto A, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Bertani H. Biliary drainage in patients with altered anatomy: Literature review of different endoscopic approaches. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(2): 113071 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113071]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Silvia Cocca, PhD, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Via Pietro Giardini 1355, Modena 41124, Emilia-Romagna, Italy. silvia.cocca@gmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Minireviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Jan 14, 2026 (publication date) through Jan 12, 2026
Times Cited of This Article
Times Cited (0)
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN
1007-9327
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
Share the Article
Cocca S, Casoni Pattacini G, Grova A, Esposito S, Lupo M, Ferrante M, Grande G, Guidotti C, Pigò F, Li Cavoli TV, Mussetto A, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Bertani H. Biliary drainage in patients with altered anatomy: Literature review of different endoscopic approaches. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(2): 113071 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113071]
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2026; 32(2): 113071 Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113071
Biliary drainage in patients with altered anatomy: Literature review of different endoscopic approaches
Silvia Cocca, Gianmaria Casoni Pattacini, Alessandro Grova, Sofia Esposito, Marinella Lupo, Mario Ferrante, Giuseppe Grande, Chiara Guidotti, Flavia Pigò, Tancredi Vincenzo Li Cavoli, Alessandro Mussetto, Micaela Piccoli, Rita Conigliaro, Helga Bertani
Silvia Cocca, Alessandro Grova, Marinella Lupo, Mario Ferrante, Giuseppe Grande, Flavia Pigò, Tancredi Vincenzo Li Cavoli, Rita Conigliaro, Helga Bertani, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Modena 41124, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Gianmaria Casoni Pattacini, Sofia Esposito, Micaela Piccoli, Department of General, Emergency Surgery and New Technologies, Baggiovara General Hospital, Modena 41126, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Chiara Guidotti, Department of Health Professions, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome 00128, Lazio, Italy
Alessandro Mussetto, Department of Gastroenterology, Santa Maria Della Croci Hospital, Ravenna 48121, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
Author contributions: Cocca S, Grova A and Ferrante M contributed to conceptualization and writing - original draft; Grova A, Ferrante M, Casoni Pattacini G, and Esposito S contributed to writing - review & editing; Bertani H, Conigliaro R, and Piccoli M contributed to supervision; Pigò F, Guidotti C, Li Cavoli TV and Grande G contributed to review and figures editing; Cocca S, Mussetto A, Lupo M and Bertani H contributed to supervision and conceptualization; and all authors have read and approved the final manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Silvia Cocca, PhD, Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Modena, Via Pietro Giardini 1355, Modena 41124, Emilia-Romagna, Italy. silvia.cocca@gmail.com
Received: August 15, 2025 Revised: September 8, 2025 Accepted: November 25, 2025 Published online: January 14, 2026 Processing time: 150 Days and 9.9 Hours
Abstract
Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with surgically altered anatomy remains a challenging field in therapeutic endoscopy due to the complex anatomical reconstructions that limit access to the biliary tree. Over the past two decades, device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), including single-balloon, double-balloon, and motorized spiral enteroscopy, has expanded the feasibility of ERCP in this population, with overall technical success rates generally reported between 70% and 90%. Nevertheless, these techniques are technically demanding, time-consuming, and frequently affected by limited reach and unstable positioning. More recently, interventional endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided procedures have emerged as highly effective alternatives, significantly improving clinical outcomes in selected patients, particularly in those with long-limb Roux-en-Y reconstructions where conventional methods are less effective. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage continues to represent a valuable salvage option when endoscopic approaches fail, though it is associated with a greater burden of reinterventions and adverse events. This minireview provides a comprehensive overview of the main endoscopic strategies for biliary drainage in altered anatomy, focusing on technical considerations, efficacy, and safety profiles of DAE-assisted ERCP, EUS-guided interventions, and motorized systems. The evolving landscape of biliary drainage in this setting highlights the need for tailored treatment strategies, multidisciplinary collaboration, referral to high-volume centers, and further prospective studies to refine patient selection and optimize clinical outcomes.
Core Tip: In patients with altered anatomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is technically demanding and requires expertise in device-assisted enteroscopy. Success depends on anticipating limitations such as scope instability, restricted reach, and prolonged procedure time, and on recognizing when to switch to alternative strategies. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage has become an important option in long-limb reconstructions, while percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage remains the most frequently used rescue technique, with surgical alternatives still possible in selected cases. Highlighting these practical considerations helps distinguish expert-level decision-making from a general overview.