Kim GH. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: It is time to consider the quality of its outcomes. World J Gastroenterol 2023; 29(43): 5800-5803 [PMID: 38074917 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i43.5800]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Gwang Ha Kim, MD, PhD, Professor, Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 47241, South Korea. doc0224@pusan.ac.kr
Research Domain of This Article
Gastroenterology & Hepatology
Article-Type of This Article
Editorial
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2023; 29(43): 5800-5803 Published online Nov 21, 2023. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v29.i43.5800
Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: It is time to consider the quality of its outcomes
Gwang Ha Kim
Gwang Ha Kim, Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan 47241, South Korea
Author contributions: Kim GH wrote and revised the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest statement: The author reported no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Gwang Ha Kim, MD, PhD, Professor, Internal Medicine, Pusan National University School of Medicine and Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, 179 Gudeok-ro, Seo-gu, Busan 47241, South Korea. doc0224@pusan.ac.kr
Received: October 7, 2023 Peer-review started: October 7, 2023 First decision: October 16, 2023 Revised: October 25, 2023 Accepted: November 9, 2023 Article in press: November 9, 2023 Published online: November 21, 2023 Processing time: 43 Days and 23.7 Hours
Abstract
Endoscopic resection, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is widely used as a standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer (EGC) when the risk of lymph node metastasis is negligible. Compared with surgical gastrectomy, ESD is a minimally invasive procedure with additional advantages, such as preservation of the entire stomach and maintenance of the patient’s quality of life. However, not all patients achieve curative resection after ESD of EGC. Several patients require surgical gastrectomy after ESD to achieve a curative treatment. Additional surgery after ESD, owing to non-curative resection, places considerable emotional and financial burdens on patients. Recently, as the number of endoscopists performing ESD has increased, the rate of non-curative resection after ESD has increased correspondingly. In order to decrease the non-curative resection rate, as well as determine the ideal rate of non-curative resection after ESD, it is time to consider quality indicators for the outcomes of ESD for EGC.
Core Tip: Endoscopic resection, particularly endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), is widely used as a standard treatment modality for early gastric cancer (EGC) when the risk of lymph node metastasis is negligible. Recently, the policy of “diagnostic ESD” has been commonly implemented, especially when accurate prediction of the depth of EGC invasion before ESD is impossible; however, it is neither ideal nor scientific. Therefore, it is time to consider quality indicators for the outcomes of ESD for EGC.
