Published online Jan 14, 2016. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i2.628
Peer-review started: May 28, 2015
First decision: September 11, 2015
Revised: September 20, 2015
Accepted: November 13, 2015
Article in press: November 13, 2015
Published online: January 14, 2016
Processing time: 224 Days and 14.5 Hours
Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) has been applied to pancreaticobiliary lesions since the 1990s and is in widespread use throughout the world today. We used this method to confirm the pathological evidence of the pancreaticobiliary lesions and to perform suitable therapies. Complications of EUS-FNA are quite rare, but some of them are severe. Operators should master conventional EUS observation and experience a minimum of 20-30 cases of supervised EUS-FNA on non-pancreatic and pancreatic lesions before attempting solo EUS-FNA. Studies conducted on pancreaticobiliary EUS-FNA have focused on selection of suitable instruments (e.g., needle selection) and sampling techniques (e.g., fanning method, suction level, with or without a stylet, optimum number of passes). Today, the diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA is still improving; the detection of pancreatic cancer (PC) currently has a sensitivity of 90%-95% and specificity of 95%-100%. In addition to PC, a variety of rare pancreatic tumors can be discriminated by conducting immunohistochemistry on the FNA materials. A flexible, large caliber needle has been used to obtain a large piece of tissue, which can provide sufficient histological information to be helpful in classifying benign pancreatic lesions. EUS-FNA can supply high diagnostic yields even for biliary lesions or peri-pancreaticobiliary lymph nodes. This review focuses on the clinical aspects of EUS-FNA in the pancreaticobiliary field, with the aim of providing information that can enable more accurate and efficient diagnosis.
Core tip: Since the first attempts in 1990th, the instruments and methodology associated with endoscopic ultrasonography-guided fine needle aspiration have been largely improved for greater safety and efficacy of the procedure and accuracy of diagnosis. Choices of suitable needle and puncture method (fanning, suction, stylet, number of the passes) are critical for the better diagnostic yields of the pancreaticobiliary lesions as well as improving endosonographic skills.