Published online Feb 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i6.1994
Peer-review started: July 27, 2014
First decision: August 15, 2014
Revised: October 27, 2014
Accepted: November 7, 2014
Article in press: November 11, 2014
Published online: February 14, 2015
Processing time: 199 Days and 3.2 Hours
The development of boceprevir and telaprevir was a major step forward in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C. In addition, the treatment of these infections has been recently revolutionized by the approval of sofosbuvir and simeprevir. However, there are several challenges associated with the application of novel drugs, such as new and more frequent adverse events, new drug interactions, and excessively high treatment costs. An additional concern is viral resistance. These considerations highlight the fact that direct-acting antiviral agents are not a panacea and may not be the best option for all patients who are in need of therapy. This retrospective study revealed that the sustained virologic response was not significantly reduced following peginterferon and ribavirin retreatment compared with the new therapy. We suggest that patients who experience relapse shortly after completing treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin have a reasonable chance of achieving a sustained virologic response when retreated with these drugs alone.
Core tip: Chronic hepatitis C-infected patients who experience relapse shortly after completing treatment with peginterferon and ribavirin have a reasonable chance of achieving a sustained virologic response when retreated with these drugs alone. Thus, it would be very reasonable to proceed with peginterferon and ribavirin retreatment alone, particularly in patients with factors associated with high rates of sustained virologic response, such as a low viral load at relapse (< 400000 IU/mL) and an early virologic response at week 12 of retreatment.