Published online Jun 7, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i21.6706
Peer-review started: December 23, 2014
First decision: January 27, 2015
Revised: February 3, 2015
Accepted: March 19, 2015
Article in press: March 19, 2015
Published online: June 7, 2015
Processing time: 170 Days and 13.6 Hours
AIM: To investigate the utility of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) to detect gastric/colorectal tumors.
METHODS: This prospective single-center study investigated inter-subject variability in patients with early-stage gastric/colorectal tumor indicated for endoscopic resection. Subjects were patients with gastric or colorectal tumors who had undergone endoscopic resection between November 2012 and November 2013. Selection criteria included age 20-80 years, either sex, and provision of informed consent. Patients were orally administered 20 mg/kg of 5-ALA enteric-coated capsules (SBI ALApromo Co., Tokyo, Japan). Administration of 5-ALA was followed by endoscopic resection of gastric or colorectal tumors, and the resected specimens were examined using a video autofluorescence processor and a fluorescence endoscope (SAFE-3000 and EB-1970AK, respectively; Pentax, Tokyo, Japan). The primary endpoint was the presence of fluorescence in tumors. Endoscopic, macroscopic, and histopathologic findings of tumors were assessed. We also evaluated adverse events of the present procedure as a secondary endpoint and examined each patient for the presence of known adverse effects of 5-ALA, namely, hematocytopenia, liver dysfunction, hypotension, nausea, and photosensitivity.
RESULTS: We enrolled 10 patients (7 men, 3 women) (n = 13 lesions: 10 gastric/3 colorectal tumors). Fluorescence was detected in 7/13 (53.8%) lesions. No significant differences in sex (male: 55.6% vs female: 50.5%, P = 1.00), age (67.1 ± 1.9 years vs 65.0 ± 2.0 years, P = 0.45), tumor color (reddish: 60.0% vs discolored: 33.3%, P = 0.56), tumor diameter (15.0 ± 2.1 mm vs 14.2 ± 2.3 mm, P = 0.80), macroscopic type (protruded: 70.0% vs depressed 0%, P = 0.07), histologic type (differentiated type: 58.3% vs 0%, P = 0.46), invasion depth (mucosal layer: 55.6% vs submucosal layer: 33.3%, P = 1.00), lymphatic invasion (present: 33.3% vs absent: 50.0%, P = 1.00), venous invasion (present: 0% vs absent: 54.5%, P = 1.00) or procedure time of endoscopic resection (36.3 ± 8.3 min vs 36.7 ± 9.0 min, P = 0.98) were observed between the patients with and without fluorescence. Fluorescence detection rate tended to be high for elevated lesions. Liver dysfunction developed in 4/10 (40.0%) patients. The extent of the liver dysfunction was a slight increase in transaminases and total bilirubin levels, which spontaneously improved in the patients. None of the patients developed photosensitivity.
CONCLUSION: Results of this preliminary study suggest the utility of PDD using 5-ALA for screening of gastric and colorectal cancers.
Core tip: We took advantage of the high tumor specificity of fluorescent protoporphyrin IX to conduct this preliminary study to apply photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) using 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) for gastrointestinal endoscopy. This study of PDD using 5-ALA showed the presence of fluorescence in early gastric cancers. This is the first study using enteric capsules for administration of 5-ALA. The findings in this study suggest that PDD with the oral administration of 5-ALA is useful and safe for the screening of early gastric and colorectal cancers.