Published online Mar 14, 2015. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i10.2865
Peer-review started: November 12, 2014
First decision: December 11, 2014
Revised: December 27, 2014
Accepted: February 5, 2015
Article in press: February 5, 2015
Published online: March 14, 2015
Processing time: 125 Days and 19.1 Hours
This review highlights the rationale for dissection of the 16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic area during pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for carcinoma of the head of the pancreas. Recent advances in surgical anatomy of the mesopancreas indicate that the retropancreatic area is not a single entity with well defined boundaries but an anatomical site of embryological fusion of peritoneal layers, and that continuity exists between the neuro lymphovascular adipose tissues of the retropancreatic and paraaortic areas. Recent advances in surgical pathology and oncology indicate that, in pancreatic head carcinoma, the mesopancreatic resection margin is the primary site for R1 resection, and that epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related processes involved in tumor progression may impact on the prevalence of R1 resection or local recurrence rates after R0 surgery. These concepts imply that mesopancreas resection during PD for pancreatic head carcinoma should be extended to the paraaortic area in order to maximize retropancreatic clearance and minimize the likelihood of an R1 resection or the persistence of residual tumor cells after R0 resection. In PD for pancreatic head carcinoma, the rationale for dissection of the paraaortic area is to control the spread of the tumor cells along the mesopancreatic resection margin, rather than to control or stage the nodal spread. Although mesopancreatic resection cannot be considered “complete” or “en bloc”, it should be “extended as far as possible” or be “maximal”, including dissection of 16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic areas.
Core tip: The rationale for dissection of the 16a2 and 16b1 paraaortic areas in pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma is to control tumor spread along the mesopancreatic resection margin (R factor), rather than to control or stage the nodal spread (N factor).