Topic Highlight
Copyright ©2014 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2014; 20(22): 6786-6808
Published online Jun 14, 2014. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i22.6786
Colorectal cancer: From prevention to personalized medicine
Gemma Binefa, Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta, Àlex Teule, Manuel Medina-Hayas
Gemma Binefa, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, CIBERESP, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
Gemma Binefa, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Barcelona, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
Francisco Rodríguez-Moranta, Endoscopy Unit, University Hospital of Bellvitge, IDIBELL, CIBERESP, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
Àlex Teule, Genetic Counseling Unit, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospitalet de Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain
Manuel Medina-Hayas, Department of Morphological Sciences, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, 08193 Barcelona, Spain
Author contributions: All of the authors contributed in each phase of the paper (design, acquisition and interpretation of data); all authors revised the draft of the manuscript and approved the final version.
Supported by Partially funded by the Carlos III Health Institute No. PI11/01593
Correspondence to: Gemma Binefa, MD, MPH, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology, IDIBELL, CIBERESP, Hospitalet de Llobregat, Av. Gran Via 199-203, 08908 Barcelona, Spain. gbinefa@iconcologia.net
Telephone: +34-93-2607351 Fax: +34-93-2607956
Received: September 28, 2013
Revised: January 16, 2014
Accepted: March 6, 2014
Published online: June 14, 2014
Processing time: 261 Days and 15.4 Hours
Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a very heterogeneous disease that is caused by the interaction of genetic and environmental factors. CRC develops through a gradual accumulation of genetic and epigenetic changes, leading to the transformation of normal colonic mucosa into invasive cancer. CRC is one of the most prevalent and incident cancers worldwide, as well as one of the most deadly. Approximately 1235108 people are diagnosed annually with CRC, and 609051 die from CRC annually. The World Health Organization estimates an increase of 77% in the number of newly diagnosed cases of CRC and an increase of 80% in deaths from CRC by 2030. The incidence of CRC can benefit from different strategies depending on its stage: health promotion through health education campaigns (when the disease is not yet present), the implementation of screening programs (for detection of the disease in its early stages), and the development of nearly personalized treatments according to both patient characteristics (age, sex) and the cancer itself (gene expression). Although there are different strategies for screening and although the number of such strategies is increasing due to the potential of emerging technologies in molecular marker application, not all strategies meet the criteria required for screening tests in population programs; the three most accepted tests are the fecal occult blood test (FOBT), colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy. FOBT is the most used method for CRC screening worldwide and is also the primary choice in most population-based screening programs in Europe. Due to its non-invasive nature and low cost, it is one of the most accepted techniques by population. CRC is a very heterogeneous disease, and with a few exceptions (APC, p53, KRAS), most of the genes involved in CRC are observed in a small percentage of cases. The design of genetic and epigenetic marker panels that are able to provide maximum coverage in the diagnosis of colorectal neoplasia seems a reasonable strategy. In recent years, the use of DNA, RNA and protein markers in different biological samples has been explored as strategies for CRC diagnosis. Although there is not yet sufficient evidence to recommend the analysis of biomarkers such as DNA, RNA or proteins in the blood or stool, it is likely that given the quick progression of technology tools in molecular biology, increasingly sensitive and less expensive, these tools will gradually be employed in clinical practice and will likely be developed in mass.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Prevention; Mass screening; Biological markers; Drug therapy

Core tip: Although there are different strategies for screening, the number of which is increasing due to the potential of emerging technologies in molecular marker application, not all strategies meet the criteria required for screening tests in population programs; the three most accepted tests are fecal occult blood test, colonoscopy and sigmoidoscopy.