Brief Article
Copyright ©2012 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jun 14, 2012; 18(22): 2867-2871
Published online Jun 14, 2012. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i22.2867
Intervention of Mirtazapine on gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia in nude mice with pancreatic carcinoma xenografts
Shu-Man Jiang, Jian-Hua Wu, Lin Jia
Shu-Man Jiang, Jian-Hua Wu, Lin Jia, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou Nan Sha Center Hospital, Guangzhou First Municipal People’s Hospital Affiliated with the Guangzhou Medical College, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China
Author contributions: Jia L, Jiang SM, and Wu JH designed the study; Wu JH performed the experiments; Jiang SM, Wu JH, and Jia L analyzed the data; Jiang SM and Jia L wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Dr. Lin Jia, Department of Gastroenterology, Guangzhou Nan Sha Center Hospital, Guangzhou First Municipal People’s Hospital Affiliated with the Guangzhou Medical College, No. 1 Panfu Road, Guangzhou 510180, Guangdong Province, China. jialin@medmail.com.cn
Telephone: +86-20-81628678 Fax: +86-20-81628809
Received: October 31, 2011
Revised: April 24, 2012
Accepted: April 27, 2012
Published online: June 14, 2012
Abstract

AIM: To investigate the effect of Mirtazapine on tumor growth, food intake, body weight, and nutritional status in gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia.

METHODS: Fourteen mice with subcutaneous xenografts of a pancreatic cancer cell line (SW1990) were randomly divided into Mirtazapine and control groups. Either Mirtazapine (10 mg/kg) or saline solution was orally fed to the mice every day after tumor implantation. A model of mild cachexia was then established in both groups by intraperitoneal injection of Gemcitabine (50 mg/kg) 10 d, 13 d, and 16 d after tumor implantation. Tumor size, food intake, body weight, and nutritional status were measured during the experiment. All mice were sacrificed at day 28.

RESULTS: (1) After 7 d of gemcitabine administration, body-weight losses of 5%-7% which suggested mild cachexia were measured; (2) No significant difference in tumor size was detected between the Mirtazapine and control groups (P > 0.05); and (3) During the entire experimental period, food intake and body weight were slightly greater for the Mirtazapine group compared with controls (although these differences were not statistically significant). After 21 d, mice in the Mirtazapine group consumed significantly more food than control mice (3.95 ± 0.14 g vs 3.54 ± 0.10 g, P = 0.004). After 25 d, mice in the Mirtazapine group were also significantly heavier than control mice (17.24 ± 0.53 g vs 18.05 ± 0.68 g, P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION: Mild cachexia model was successfully established by gemcitabine in pancreatic tumor-bearing mice. Mirtazapine can improve gemcitabine-induced mild cachexia in pancreatic tumor-bearing mice. It was believed to provide a potential therapeutic perspective for further studies on cachexia.

Keywords: Pancreatic carcinoma; Cachexia; Mirtazapine; Gemcitabine; Antidepressant