Orignal Articles
Copyright ©2009 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. May 14, 2009; 15(18): 2214-2219
Published online May 14, 2009. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.2214
Feasibility of confocal endomicroscopy in the diagnosis of pediatric gastrointestinal disorders
Krishnappa Venkatesh, Marta Cohen, Clair Evans, Peter Delaney, Steven Thomas, Christopher Taylor, Ashraf Abou-Taleb, Ralf Kiesslich, Mike Thomson
Krishnappa Venkatesh, Christopher Taylor, Ashraf Abou-Taleb, Mike Thomson, Centre for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
Marta Cohen, Clair Evans, Department of Histopathology, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom
Peter Delaney, Steven Thomas, Optiscan, PO Box 1066, Mt Waverley, MDC, Victoria, Australia 3149, Australia
Ralf Kiesslich, I. Med. Klink und Poliklinik, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz 55131, Germany
Author contributions: All authors contributed to the research; Venkatesh K, Cohen M, and Thomson M designed the project; Venkatesh K, Abou-Taleb A, Cohen M, Evans C and Thomson M performed research.
Correspondence to: Dr. Mike Thomson, Centre for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TH, United Kingdom. mike.thomson@sch.nhs.uk
Telephone: +44-114-2717673
Fax: +44-114-2267956
Received: April 29, 2008
Revised: January 22, 2009
Accepted: January 29, 2009
Published online: May 14, 2009
Abstract

AIM: To evaluate the feasibility and utility of confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) in the description of normal gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa and in the diagnosis of GI disorders in children, in comparison to histology.

METHODS: Forty-four patients (19 female) median age 10.9 years (range 0.7-16.6 years) with suspected or known GI pathology underwent esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy (OGD) (n = 36) and/or ileocolonoscopy (IC) (n = 31) with CLE using sodium fluorescein and acriflavine as contrast agents. Histological sections were compared with same site confocal images by two experienced pediatric and GI histopathologists and endoscopists, respectively.

RESULTS: Duodenum and ileum were intubated in all but one patient undergoing OGD and IC. The median procedure time was 16.4 min (range 7-25 min) for OGD and 27.9 min (range 15-45 min) for IC. A total of 4798 confocal images were compared with 153 biopsies from the upper GI tract from 36 procedures, and 4661 confocal images were compared with 188 biopsies from the ileocolon from 31 procedures. Confocal images were comparable to conventional histology both in normal and in pathological conditions such as esophagitis, Helicobacter pylori gastritis, celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease, colonic heterotopia, and graft versus host disease.

CONCLUSION: CLE offers the prospect of targeting biopsies to abnormal mucosa, thereby increasing diagnostic yield, reducing the number of biopsies, decreasing the burden on the histopathological services, and reducing costs.

Keywords: Confocal laser endomicroscopy; Histology; Pediatric; Gastrointestinal mucosa; Gastrointestinal disorders