Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2008 The WJG Press and Baishideng. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 7, 2008; 14(25): 4054-4058
Published online Jul 7, 2008. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.4054
Successful outcomes of EMR-L with 3D-EUS for rectal carcinoids compared with historical controls
Tsuyoshi Abe, Tadayoshi Kakemura, Sumio Fujinuma, Iruru Maetani
Tsuyoshi Abe, Tadayoshi Kakemura, Sumio Fujinuma, Iruru Maetani, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan
Author contributions: Abe T and Kakemura T contributed equally to this work; Abe T, Kakemura T, Fujinuma S and Maetani I designed the research; Abe T and Kakemura T performed the research, analyzed the data and wrote the paper.
Correspondence to: Tsuyoshi Abe, MD, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Toho University Ohashi Medical Center, 2-17-6 Ohashi Meguro-ku, Tokyo 153-8515, Japan. tsuys@d6.dion.ne.jp
Telephone: +81-3-34681251
Fax: +81-3-34681269
Received: January 18, 2008
Revised: April 9, 2008
Accepted: April 16, 2008
Published online: July 7, 2008
Abstract

AIM: To assess the results of endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device (EMR-L) combined with three dimensional endoscopic ultrasonography (3D-EUS) using an ultrasonic probe for rectal carcinoids. In addition, diagnosis of the depth and size of lesions by EUS was evaluated.

METHODS: Between January 2003 and March 2007, 20 patients underwent EMR-L with 3D-EUS using an ultrasonic probe (group A). 3D-EUS was combined with EMR-L at the time of injection of sterile physiological saline into the submucosal layer. For comparison, 14 rectal carcinoids that had been treated by EMR-L without 3D-EUS between April 1998 and December 2002 were evaluated as historical controls (group B). EUS was conducted for all of the patients before treatment to evaluate tumor diameter and depth of invasion. The percentage of complete resection and the vertical resection margin were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS: The depth of invasion upon histopathological examination was in complete agreement with the pre-operative findings by EUS. The tumor diameter determined by EUS approximated that found in the tissue samples. There were no significant differences in the gender, tumor sites or tumor diameters between the two groups. The rate of complete resection for groups A and B was 100% and 71%, respectively (P < 0.05). The vertical resection margin of group A was longer than that of group B.

CONCLUSION: EMR-L is effective as an endoscopic treatment for rectal carcinoids. In combination with 3D-EUS, safe and complete resection is further assured.

Keywords: Endoscopic mucosal resection with a ligation device; Endoscopic therapy; Endoscopic ultrasonography; Rectal carcinoids