Gastric Cancer
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 28, 2007; 13(32): 4321-4327
Published online Aug 28, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i32.4321
Syndrome differentiation in traditional Chinese medicine and E-cadherin/ICAM-1 gene protein expression in gastric carcinoma
Da-Zhi Sun, Ling Xu, Pin-Kang Wei, Long Liu, Jin He
Da-Zhi Sun, Ling Xu, Pin-Kang Wei, Long Liu, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital to Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
Jin He, Department of Pathology, Second Affiliated Hospital to Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30271626
Correspondence to: Ling Xu, Department of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital to Second Military Medical University, 415 fengyang Road, Shanghai 200003, China. xulq67@yahoo.com.cn
Telephone: +86-21-63610109-73406
Received: March 3, 2007
Revised: March 23, 2007
Accepted: March 28, 2007
Published online: August 28, 2007
Abstract

AIM: To explore the syndrome differentiation in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and gene protein expression in gastric carcinoma.

METHODS: Preoperative data of gastric cancer cases were collected from the General Surgery Department and classified according to the criteria for syndrome differentiation in TCM. E-cadherin (E-cad) and ICAM-1 gene protein expressions were detected in postoperative specimens from these cases by the immunohistochemical EnVision two-step method.

RESULTS: The E-cad positive expression rate was 90% in 100 cases of gastric carcinoma. The difference in E-cad expression was significant between the different syndrome differentiation types in TCM (P < 0.01). Further group-group comparison showed that there was a significant difference in E-cad expression between the stagnation of phlegm-damp type and the deficiency in both qi and blood and the deficiency-cold of stomach and spleen types, where E-cad expression was high. There was no significant difference between the internal obstruction of stagnant toxin type and the in-coordination between liver and stomach type, where E-cad expression was relatively low. The ICAM-1 positive expression rate was 58%, and there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (χ2= 8.999, P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION: E-cad expression is relatively low in the internal obstruction of stagnant toxin type and the in-coordination between liver and stomach type, where tumor development and metastasis may be associated with low E-cad expression, or with low homogeneous adhesiveness between tumor cells.

Keywords: Gastric carcinoma; Syndrome differentiation in traditional Chinese medicine; Metastasis; E-cadherin; ICAM-1