Rapid Communication
Copyright ©2007 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2007; 13(29): 3962-3966
Published online Aug 7, 2007. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v13.i29.3962
Utility of endoscopic ultrasound, cytology and fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 levels in pancreatic cystic lesions
Abdulrahman M Aljebreen, Joseph Romagnuolo, Rafael Perini, Francis Sutherland
Abdulrahman M Aljebreen, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Joseph Romagnuolo, Medical University of South Carolina, Digestive Disease Center, Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Rafael Perini, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Francis Sutherland, Department of General Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Author contributions: All authors contributed equally to the work.
Supported by funds from the Alberta Heritage Foundation of Medical Research
Correspondence to: Dr. Joseph Romagnuolo, Director of Clinical Research, Medical University of South Carolina (MUSC), Digestive Disease Center, 96 Jonathon Lucas St, CSB #210, PO Box 250 327 Charleston, SC 29425 United States. romagnuo@musc.edu
Telephone: +1-843-792990 Fax: +1-843-7928395
Received: March 17, 2007
Revised: April 1, 2007
Accepted: April 11, 2007
Published online: August 7, 2007
Abstract

AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), fluid tumor markers and cytology in distinguishing benign from (pre)malignant pancreatic cystic lesions.

METHODS: 46 consecutive patients, referred to a gastroenterologist and surgeon for a symptomatic or incidental pancreatic cyst, were reviewed. EUS, cytology, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) levels were compared with the final diagnosis, based on surgical pathology and/or imaging follow-up of at least 12 mo. Cysts were classified as benign (pseudocyst, serous cystadenoma) or malignant/pre-malignant (mucinous cystic neoplasm). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed.

RESULTS: The mean age was 56 years; 29% were male and median cyst diameter was 3 cm. Final outcome was obtained in 41 (89%) patients. Twenty-three (56%) of these 41 had surgical pathology. Twenty-three (56%) had benign lesions and 18 (44%) had malignant/pre-malignant lesions. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of EUS alone to distinguish benign from malignant/premalignant pancreatic cystic lesions were 50%, 56%, 36% and 54% and for cytology were 71%, 96%, 92% and 85%, respectively. The corresponding values for the ROC-derived ideal cutoffs were 75%, 90%, 75%, 90% for CA 19-9 (> 37 U/mL) and 70%, 85%, 79% and 78% for CEA (> 3.1 ng/mL). Subgroup analysis of those with surgical pathology yielded almost identical performance and cutoffs.

CONCLUSION: Cytology and cyst fluid tumor marker analysis is a very useful tool in distinguishing benign from (pre)malignant pancreatic cystic lesions.

Keywords: Endoscopic ultrasound; Carcinoembryonic antigen; CA 19-9; Pancreatic cystic lesions; Fine needle aspiration