Esophageal Cancer
Copyright ©2006 Baishideng Publishing Group Co., Limited. All rights reserved.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 7, 2006; 12(33): 5281-5286
Published online Sep 7, 2006. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v12.i33.5281
Mutation screening of mismatch repair gene Mlh3 in familial esophageal cancer
Hong-Xu Liu, Yu Li, Xue-Dong Jiang, Hong-Nian Yin, Lin Zhang, Yu Wang, Jun Yang
Hong-Xu Liu, Yu Li, Hong-Nian Yin, Lin Zhang, Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China
Xue-Dong Jiang, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Liaoning General Hospital of Armed Police, Shenyang 110034, Liaoning Province, China
Yu Wang, Second Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Liaoning Electric Power, Shenyang 110015, Liaoning Province, China
Jun Yang, Department of Surgery, Enliang Hospital, Tai’an County 114100, Liaoning Province, China
Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, No. 30070850; grant from Ministry of Education of China, No. (2004) 527; and grant from Armed Police Logistics Scientific Research Project, No. WKH2004010
Correspondence to: Dr. Hong-Xu Liu, Department of Thoracic Surgery, First Hospital, China Medical University, Shenyang 110001, Liaoning Province, China. hongxuliu@yahoo.com
Telephone: +86-24-83283498 Fax: +86-24-22815632
Received: April 25, 2006
Revised: April 28, 2006
Accepted: May 22, 2006
Published online: September 7, 2006
Abstract

AIM: To shed light on the possible role of mismatch repair gene Mlh3 in familial esophageal cancer (FEC).

METHODS: A total of 66 members from 10 families suggestive of a genetic predisposition to hereditary esophageal cancer were screened for germline mutations in Mlh3 with denaturing high performance liquid chromatography (DHPLC), a newly developed method of comparative sequencing based on heteroduplex detection. For all samples exhibiting abnormal DHPLC profiles, sequence changes were evaluated by cycle sequencing. For any mutation in family members, we conducted a segregation study to compare its prevalence in sporadic esophageal cancer patients and normal controls.

RESULTS: Exons of Mlh3 in all samples were successfully examined. Overall, 4 missense mutations and 3 polymorphisms were identified in 4 families. Mlh3 missense mutations in families 9 and 10 might be pathogenic, but had a reduced penetrance. While in families 1 and 7, there was no sufficient evidence supporting the monogenic explanations of esophageal cancers in families. The mutations were found in 33% of high-risk families and 50% of low-risk families.

CONCLUSION: Mlh3 is a high risk gene with a reduced penetrance in some families. However, it acts as a low risk gene for esophageal cancer in most families. Mutations of Mlh3 may work together with other genes in an accumulated manner and result in an increased risk of esophageal tumor. DHPLC is a robust and sensitive technique for screening gene mutations.

Keywords: Mlh3; DNA mismatch repair; Familial esophageal cancer; Mutation screening; Denaturing high performance liquid chromatography