BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Cited by in CrossRef
For: Chen L, Liu LP, Wen N, Qiao X, Meng YG. Comparative analysis of robotic vs laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7(20): 3185-3193 [PMID: 31667168 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i20.3185]
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v7/i20/3185.htm
Number Citing Articles
1
Satoshi Katayama, Keiichiro Mori, Benjamin Pradere, Takafumi Yanagisawa, Hadi Mostafaei, Fahad Quhal, Reza Sari Motlagh, Ekaterina Laukhtina, Nico C. Grossmann, Pawel Rajwa, Abdulmajeed Aydh, Frederik König, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Motoo Araki, Yasutomo Nasu, Shahrokh F. Shariat. Influence of steep Trendelenburg position on postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysisJournal of Robotic Surgery 2021; 16(6): 1233 doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01361-x
2
IGT Baeten, JP Hoogendam, HWR Schreuder, IM Jürgenliemk‐Schulz, RHM Verheijen, RP Zweemer, CG Gerestein. The influence of learning curve of robot‐assisted laparoscopy on oncological outcomes in early‐stage cervical cancer: an observational cohort studyBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2021; 128(3): 563 doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16399
3
Jong Ha Hwang, Bitnarae Kim. Comparison of survival outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic radical hysterectomies for early-stage cervical cancer: a systemic review and meta-analysisJournal of Gynecologic Oncology 2024; 35(1) doi: 10.3802/jgo.2024.35.e9
4
Khadija Alshowaikh, Katarzyna Karpinska-Leydier, Jashvini Amirthalingam , Gokul Paidi, Anuruddhika I Iroshani Jayarathna, Divya Bala Anthony Manisha R Salibindla, Huseyin Ekin Ergin. Surgical and Patient Outcomes of Robotic Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Systematic Review Cureus 2021;  doi: 10.7759/cureus.16828
5
Gun Oh Chong. Robotic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A systematic literature reviewGynecologic Robotic Surgery 2021; 2(2): 33 doi: 10.36637/grs.2021.00038
6
Jong Ha Hwang, Bo Wook Kim. The incidence of perioperative lymphatic complications after radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy between robotic and laparoscopic approach : a systemic review and meta-analysisInternational Journal of Surgery 2023;  doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000472
7
Benny Brandt, Gabriel Levin, Mario M. Leitao. Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: the Right Surgical ApproachCurrent Treatment Options in Oncology 2022; 23(1): 1 doi: 10.1007/s11864-021-00919-z
8
Soo Young Jeong, Kyoungseon Kim, Ji Won Ryu, Jieum Cha, Sung Taek Park, Sung Ho Park. Comparison of Surgical Outcomes of Robotic versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy of Large Uterus with Gynecologic Benign DiseaseJournal of Personalized Medicine 2022; 12(12): 2042 doi: 10.3390/jpm12122042
9
Xuzhi Liang, Haijing He, Yingjin Li, Sibang Chen, Jinche Zhao, Bing Yang, Huisi Lin, Hao Zeng, Liuyi Wei, Jiahuang Yang, Jiangtao Fan. An optimized robotic surgical technique for cervical cancer: investigating whether the use of the pulling robotic arm has better surgical outcomesFrontiers in Oncology 2023; 13 doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1159081
10
Wen Yang, Yuanguang Meng. The application of robotic surgery in gynecology in the age of artificial intelligenceIntelligent Surgery 2023; 6: 64 doi: 10.1016/j.isurg.2023.09.002
11
Pluvio J. Coronado, Myriam Gracia. Robotic radical hysterectomy after conization for patients with small volume early-stage cervical cancerBest Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2024; 92: 102434 doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2023.102434
12
Asumi Okumura, Eiji Kondo, Masafumi Nii, Michiko Kubo-Kaneda, Kenta Yoshida, Tomoaki Ikeda. Comparison of surgical outcomes between robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and conventional total laparoscopic hysterectomy in gynecologic benign disease: a single-center cohort studyJournal of Robotic Surgery 2023; 17(5): 2221 doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01638-3
13
Jin Huang, Zhe Tan, Wenyue Wu, Xiuqian Wu, Lian Liu, Chunlin Li. Effect of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery on postoperative wound infection in patients with cervical cancer: A meta‐analysisInternational Wound Journal 2024; 21(2) doi: 10.1111/iwj.14437
14
Michael G. Baracy, Alexis Kerl, Karen Hagglund, Brian Fennell, Logan Corey, Muhammad Faisal Aslam. Trends in surgical approach to hysterectomy and perioperative outcomes in Michigan hospitals from 2010 through 2020Journal of Robotic Surgery 2023; 17(5): 2211 doi: 10.1007/s11701-023-01631-w
15
Mario Palumbo, Luigi Della Corte, Carlo Ronsini, Serena Guerra, Pierluigi Giampaolino, Giuseppe Bifulco. Surgical Treatment for Early Cervical Cancer in the HPV Era: State of the ArtHealthcare 2023; 11(22): 2942 doi: 10.3390/healthcare11222942
16
Xinmeng Guo, Shuang Tian, Hui Wang, Jinning Zhang, Yanfei Cheng, Yuanqing Yao. Outcomes associated with different surgical approaches to radical hysterectomy: A systematic review and network meta‐analysisInternational Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics 2023; 160(1): 28 doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14209
17
Odhrán K. Ryan, Katie L. Doogan, Éanna J. Ryan, Mark Donnelly, Ian S. Reynolds, Ben Creavin, Matthew G. Davey, Michael E. Kelly, Rory Kennelly, Ann Hanly, Seán T. Martin, Des C. Winter. Comparing minimally invasive surgical and open approaches to pelvic exenteration for locally advanced or recurrent pelvic malignancies - Systematic review and meta-analysisEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology 2023; 49(8): 1362 doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.04.003
18
Anupama Bahadur, Rabia Zaman, Rajlaxmi Mundhra, Kalaivani Mani. Robotic-assisted Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Gynecological Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysisJournal of Mid-life Health 2024; 15(2): 91 doi: 10.4103/jmh.jmh_235_23