|
1
|
Manisundaram N, Childers CP, Hu CY, Uppal A, Konishi T, Bednarski BK, White MG, Peacock O, You YN, Chang GJ. Rise in Minimally Invasive Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Is Associated With Adoption of Robotic Surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 2025; 68:426-436. [PMID: 39745312 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery is associated with improved short-term outcomes and similar long-term oncologic outcomes for patients with colorectal cancer compared with open surgery. Although the robotic approach has ergonomic and technical benefits, how it has impacted the utilization of traditional laparoscopic surgery and minimally invasive surgery overall is unclear. OBJECTIVE Describe trends in open, robotic, and laparoscopic approaches for colorectal cancer resections and examine factors associated with minimally invasive surgery. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using data from the National Cancer Database from 2010 to 2020. SETTING Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities. PATIENTS Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colon or rectal adenocarcinoma. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Surgical approach rates (open, robotic, and laparoscopic). RESULTS We identified 475,001 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma, of whom 192,237 (40.5%) underwent open surgery, 64,945 (13.7%) underwent robotic surgery, and 217,819 (45.9%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. For colon cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery use steadily increased, with a peak prevalence of 54.0% in 2016, and total minimally invasive surgery (robotic + laparoscopic) was performed more often than open surgery from 2013 through 2020. For rectal cancer, laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery had a peak prevalence of 37.2% in 2014 and declined from 2014 through 2020; robotic surgery prevalence increased throughout the study period (5.5% in 2010, 24.7% in 2015, and 48.8% in 2020). Minimally invasive surgery use increased in facilities performing robotic surgery every year during the study period. For both colon and rectal cancer, the use of open surgery decreased across all facilities throughout the study period. LIMITATIONS This study used the National Cancer Database, which may not be generalizable to non-Commission on Cancer institutions. CONCLUSIONS Minimally invasive surgery steadily increased across all facilities from 2010 through 2020. Open resections declined, laparoscopic resections plateaued, and robotic resections increased for colon and rectal cancer. Minimally invasive surgery increases may be driven by increases in robot-assisted surgery. See Video Abstract. EL AUMENTO DE LA CIRUGA MNIMAMENTE INVASIVA PARA EL CNCER COLORRECTAL SE ASOCIA CON LA ADOPCIN A LA CIRUGA ROBTICA ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía mínimamente invasiva se asocia con mejores resultados a corto plazo y resultados oncológicos similares a largo plazo para pacientes con cáncer colorrectal en comparación con la cirugía abierta. Aunque el abordaje robótico tiene beneficios ergonómicos y técnicos, no está claro cómo ha afectado la utilización de la cirugía laparoscópica tradicional y la cirugía mínimamente invasiva en general.OBJETIVO:Describir las tendencias en los abordajes abiertos, robóticos y laparoscópicos para las resecciones de cáncer colorrectal y examinar los factores asociados con la cirugía mínimamente invasiva.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando datos de la Base de Datos Nacional del Cáncer desde 2010 hasta 2020.ESCENARIO:Centros estadounidenses acreditados por la Comisión sobre el Cáncer.PACIENTES:Pacientes diagnosticados con adenocarcinoma de colon o recto no metastásico.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACIÓN:Tasas de abordaje quirúrgico (abierto, robótico, laparoscópico).RESULTADOS:Identificamos 475.001 pacientes con diagnóstico de adenocarcinoma colorrectal no metastásico, de los cuales 192.237 (40,5%) se sometieron a cirugía abierta, 64.945 (13,7%) se sometieron a cirugía robótica y 217.819 (45,9%) se sometieron a cirugía laparoscópica. Para el cáncer de colon, el uso de cirugía mínimamente invasiva laparoscópica aumentó de manera constante, con una prevalencia máxima del 54,0% en 2016, y la cirugía mínimamente invasiva total (robótica + laparoscópica) se realizó con mayor frecuencia que la cirugía abierta desde 2013 hasta 2020. Para el cáncer de recto, la cirugía mínimamente invasiva laparoscópica tuvo una prevalencia máxima del 37,2% en 2014 y disminuyó desde 2014 hasta 2020; La prevalencia de la cirugía robótica aumentó durante el período de estudio (5,5 % en 2010, 24,7 % en 2015, 48,8 % en 2020). El uso de cirugía mínimamente invasiva aumentó en los centros que realizan cirugía robótica cada año durante el período de estudio. Tanto para el cáncer de colon como para el cáncer de recto, el uso de cirugía abierta disminuyó en todos los centros durante el período de estudio.LIMITACIONES:Se utilizó la base de datos nacional sobre el cáncer, que puede no ser generalizable a instituciones que no pertenecen a la Comisión sobre el Cáncer.CONCLUSIONES:La cirugía mínimamente invasiva aumentó de manera constante en todos los centros entre 2010 y 2020. Las resecciones abiertas disminuyeron, las resecciones laparoscópicas se estabilizaron y las resecciones robóticas aumentaron para el cáncer de colon y recto. Los aumentos de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva pueden estar impulsados por aumentos en la cirugía asistida por robot. (Traducción--Ingrid Melo ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naveen Manisundaram
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher P Childers
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Chung-Yuan Hu
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Abhineet Uppal
- Department of Surgery, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tsuyoshi Konishi
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Brian K Bednarski
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael G White
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Oliver Peacock
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Y Nancy You
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - George J Chang
- Department of Colon and Rectal Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Falola AF, Adeyeye A, Shekoni O, Oluwagbemi A, Effiong-John B, Ogbodu E, Dada OS, Ndong A. Robotic and laparoscopic minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer in Africa: an outcome comparison endorsed by the Nigerian society for colorectal disorders. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:122-140. [PMID: 39658673 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-11416-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 12/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minimally invasive surgery for colorectal cancer (CRC) offer superior outcomes compared to open surgery. This study aimed to review the robotic and laparoscopic procedures for CRC performed in Africa, and compare the mean surgery duration, blood loss, hospital stay, rate of conversion, and prevalence of morbidity and mortality. This is the first study to compare the outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic surgeries for CRC in Africa. METHODS A systematic review following the PRISMA guidelines was conducted. PubMed, Google Scholar, Web of Science, AJOL, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched, identifying 2,259 publications, 33 of which were deemed eligible. Statistical analysis of outcomes was performed using "R". Methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane ROBINS-I tool. RESULTS The minimally invasive approach has been applied for CRC treatment in seven African countries: Algeria, Cameroon, Egypt, Morocco, Nigeria, Senegal, and South Africa. Laparoscopic surgeries accounted for 1,485 (95%) of cases, while 71 (5%) were robotic. Robotic procedures were associated with a longer surgery duration (256.41 min vs. 190.45 min, p < 0.0001), higher blood loss (226.48 mL vs. 141.55 mL, p < 0.0001), and a shorter hospital stay (4.52 days vs. 6.06 days, p = 0.85). Robotic procedures had a lower rate of conversion (3% vs. 8%, p = 0.29) and a lower prevalence of morbidity (19% vs. 26%, p = 0.26). Wound infection (24.49%) and ileus (57.14%) were the most common complications following laparoscopic and robotic procedures, respectively. There was no mortality from robotic surgeries; however, a prevalence of 0.39% (95% CI: 0;1.19) was recorded from laparoscopy. CONCLUSIONS This study establishes and compares the outcomes of advances in the treatment of CRC in the African setting, providing insights for policymakers, healthcare providers, and international organizations to make decisions regarding optimizing care for CRC patients in Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adebayo Feranmi Falola
- University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria.
- General Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.
| | - Ademola Adeyeye
- Significant Polyp and Early Colorectal Cancer Service, King's College Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Surgery, University of Ilorin Teaching Hospital, Ilorin, Nigeria
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
| | - Oluwatobi Shekoni
- General Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria
- Mid and South Essex NHS Foundation Trust, Chelmsford, UK
| | | | - Blessing Effiong-John
- University of Ibadan College of Medicine, Ibadan, Nigeria
- General Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria
| | - Emmanuella Ogbodu
- General Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria
- Asaba Specialist Hospital, Asaba, Nigeria
| | - Oluwasina Samuel Dada
- General Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Abdourahmane Ndong
- General Surgery Community, Surgery Interest Group of Africa, Lagos, Nigeria
- Department of Surgery, Gaston Berger University, Saint-Louis, Senegal
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Brune M, Hotop A, Silliman W, Bartow K. Case Report: Robotic Repair of a Perineal Hernia Following Abdominoperineal Resection. JOURNAL OF ABDOMINAL WALL SURGERY : JAWS 2024; 3:13481. [PMID: 39677356 PMCID: PMC11637873 DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2024.13481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 12/17/2024]
Abstract
Introduction Perineal hernias, protrusions through the pelvic diaphragm, are a rare complication post-abdominoperineal resection. The shift to extralevator APR techniques could be linked to a potential increase in these hernias. This case series evaluates the surgical management of perineal hernias, focusing on the evolving role of robotic surgery. Given the limited existing research on robotic repairs in this context, it highlights its potential as an innovative approach. Presentation of Case In a case series, we report three patients who underwent robotic abdominoperineal resection (APR) for rectal and anal canal carcinoma after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. The 65-year-old female developed a perineal hernia 7 months post-operatively, the 67-year-old male after 4 years, and the 63-year-old female presented with a recurrent perineal hernia post-APR with gracilis flap reconstruction. All patients underwent successful robotic hernia repairs with mesh placement and demonstrated symptomatic improvement post-operatively. Discussion Perineal hernia management lacks a standardized protocol, with methods ranging from open to laparoscopic techniques. A review of recent literature suggests increasing favorability towards laparoscopic and robotic approaches due to their less invasive nature. Our cases demonstrate the advantages of robotic surgery's precision and improved visualization, supporting its use in perineal hernia repair, although more research is needed to confirm. Conclusion Robotic-assisted surgery for perineal hernia repair post-APR shows promise, enhancing the benefits of laparoscopic methods. This series underlines the potential of this approach, though further investigation in larger studies is essential to establish its advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Madison Brune
- Department of General Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - Austin Hotop
- Department of General Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| | - William Silliman
- Department of General Surgery, St. Francis Medical Center, Cape Girardeau, MO, United States
| | - Kevin Bartow
- Department of General Surgery, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Massias S, Vadhwana B, Arjomandi Rad A, Hollingshead J, Patel V. Feasibility, clinical outcomes, and learning curves of robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery in a high-volume district general hospital: a cohort study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2024; 86:5744-5749. [PMID: 39359778 PMCID: PMC11444557 DOI: 10.1097/ms9.0000000000002545] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 08/25/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) is one of the most influential surgical advances with widespread clinical and health-economic benefits. West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospital NHS Trust was the first in the UK to simultaneously integrate two CMR Surgical Versius robots. This study aims to investigate clinical outcomes of RAS, explore surgeon learning curves and assess the feasibility of implementation within a district general hospital (DGH). Methods A prospective cohort study of 100 consecutive patient data were collected between July 2022 and August 2023, including demographics, operative and clinical variables, and compared with laparoscopic surgery (LS) data from the National Bowel Cancer Audit. Surgeon learning curves were analysed using sequential surgical and console times. Results In the RAS cohort, the median age was 70 (IQR 57-78 years) and 60% were male. Retrieval of a minimum of 12 lymph nodes significantly increased in RAS compared to LS (95% vs. 88%, P=0.05). The negative mesorectal margin rate was similar between RAS and LS (97% vs. 91%, P=0.10), as well as length of stay greater than 5 days (42% vs. 39%, P=0.27). For anterior resections performed by the highest volume surgeon (n=16), surgical time was reduced over 1 year by 35% (304.9-196.9 min), whilst console time increased by 111% (63.0-132.8 min). Conclusions Key quality performance indicators were either unchanged or improved with RAS. There is potential for improved theatre utilisation and cost-savings with increased RAS. This study demonstrates the feasibility and easy integration of robotic platforms into DGHs, offering wider training opportunities for the next generation of surgeons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Massias
- Department of Surgery, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford General Hospital
| | - Bhamini Vadhwana
- Department of Surgery, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford General Hospital
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London
| | - Arian Arjomandi Rad
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford, UK
| | - James Hollingshead
- Department of Surgery, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford General Hospital
| | - Vanash Patel
- Department of Surgery, West Hertfordshire Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Watford General Hospital
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, St Mary’s Hospital, London
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Kamara M, Baur K, Langmeyer J, Huebner M, Ramm C, Cleary RK. Early discharge after enhanced recovery rectal resection does not increase emergency department visits and readmissions: a single institution analysis. Surg Endosc 2024; 38:4251-4259. [PMID: 38862825 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-024-10967-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge after colectomy in enhanced recovery pathways has been shown to be feasible. It is not clear how early patients with rectal resections may be safely discharged. The study aim was to determine if patients discharged ≤ 3 days after rectal resections are associated with increased rates of emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmissions. METHODS Retrospective analysis of enhanced recovery low anterior resection, abdominoperineal resection, and proctocolectomy patients in a prospectively maintained single institution colorectal surgery database from 01/01/2018 to 07/15/2022. Clinic visits were scheduled within 4-7 days and at 30 days after discharge, and every 1-2 weeks for stoma patients until no longer needed. Logistic regression models were used to analyze the association of discharge on postoperative days (POD)-1-3, POD-4-5, and POD ≥ 6 days with incidence of ED visits and readmissions. RESULTS A total of 118 patients met inclusion criteria, 76 with stomas. Median postoperative length of stay was 5 [IQR 6.5] days. Mean age was 58.6 years; 59.3% were ASA-3; and 69.5% had a minimally invasive surgical approach. ED visits were not significantly different between discharge-day groups (p = 0.096). No patients were discharged same-day, one without a stoma was discharged on POD-1, ten patients (2 with stomas) on POD-2, and twenty-four patients (13 with stomas) on POD-3. ED visits were lowest for the POD-1-3 group (14.3%) but not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.166). Readmission rate was also lowest for the POD-1-3 group (11.4%) and also not significantly different than later discharge groups (p = 0.261) and this was confirmed with logistic regression. Complication rate was lowest in the POD-1-3 group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Early discharge after enhanced recovery partial or complete proctectomy is not associated with increased ED visits and readmissions. Follow up studies should identify post-discharge resources that allow safe early discharge and that may be standardized and generalizable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maseray Kamara
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Katherine Baur
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Jessie Langmeyer
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Marianne Huebner
- Center for Statistical Training and Consulting, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Carole Ramm
- Department of Academic Research, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Robert K Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Trinity Health Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Alnumay A. Comparison of outcomes after unplanned conversion for patients undergoing robotic when compared with laparoscopic colectomy. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:283. [PMID: 39003434 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-02044-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/15/2024]
Abstract
The robotic approach improves the feasibility of minimally invasive colectomy even where there may be an anatomic challenge with laparoscopy. Whether a failure in completing colectomy with this newer technology is associated with worse consequences needs to be considered when evaluating the relative benefit of robotic colectomy. The aim of this study is to evaluate rates of conversion to open surgery after robotic and laparoscopic colectomy and whether outcomes after conversion vary after the two techniques since this has not been well studied. From the American College of Surgeons (ACS) - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) (2015-2016), patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomy were identified. Converted robotic were compared to laparoscopic procedures for patient demographics, co-morbidities; primary procedure and diagnosis, prolonged operation and postoperative complications. Of 36,046 colectomy procedures, 30,808 (85.5%) were laparoscopic, while 5238 (14.5%) were robotic-assisted. There were 3271 (9.1%) conversions to open surgery (laparoscopic: 2959 [9.6%]; robotic: 312 [6%]). Thirty-day postoperative surgical site infection, anastomotic leak, ileus, sepsis, bleeding requiring transfusion, urinary tract infection, reoperation; pulmonary, renal, cardiac/cerebrovascular complications; readmission, hospital stay, and mortality, were similar between the two groups. However, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism was higher after robotic conversion (4.5% vs. 2.2%, p = 0.01). Conversion was lower after robotic when compared to laparoscopic colectomy. Converted patients had similar outcomes except for vein thromboembolism which was higher after robotic surgery. Robotic technology seems to improve the feasibility of minimally invasive surgery without negatively affecting safety and efficacy even when conversion is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz Alnumay
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, King Saud University, 3332, 8108, 12372, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Quach G, Zielinski MD. Surgical management of small bowel obstruction: What you need to know. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2024; 96:357-363. [PMID: 37962129 DOI: 10.1097/ta.0000000000004195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giang Quach
- From the Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery (G.Q., M.D.Z.), Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Shapera E, Touadi M, Dickow J, Azure E, Attar M, Gorges M, Aivaz M. Robotic Cholecystectomy Remains Safe and Effective After Regular Staffing Hours. Cureus 2024; 16:e54413. [PMID: 38505428 PMCID: PMC10950418 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Robotic-assisted surgery continues to grow in popularity. Access during evenings and weekends for non-elective operations can be restricted out of safety concerns. We sought to analyze and compare outcomes of patients undergoing robotic cholecystectomy, a common urgent procedure for acute calculous cholecystitis, during regular hours versus evenings or weekends. Based on this comparison, we sought to determine if this restriction is justified. Methods We performed a retrospective analysis of 46 patients who underwent robotic cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis per 2018 Tokyo criteria by a single surgeon at a single institution between 2021 and 2022. Patients were grouped as undergoing "after-hours" cholecystectomy if the operation started at five pm or later, or anytime during the weekend (Saturday, Sunday). Demographic, perioperative, and outcome variables were tabulated and analyzed. For illustrative purposes, the data presented as median ± standard deviation were applicable. Results After-hours cholecystectomy occurred in 26 patients and regular-hours cholecystectomy occurred in 20 patients. There were no significant differences in perioperative variables between the two cohorts in terms of body mass index, age, gender, cirrhotic status, American Society of Anesthesiology score, white blood cell count, or neutrophil percentage. The after-hours group had more prior abdominal operations. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of operative time, estimated blood loss, or length of stay. There were no mortalities. There was one readmission in the after-hours cohort unrelated to the operation. Conclusion Robotic cholecystectomy can be safely performed on the weekends and evenings. Hospitals should make the robotic platform available during this time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Melissa Touadi
- School of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, USA
| | - Jade Dickow
- Surgery, Academy of Our Lady of Peace, San Diego, USA
| | - Ellie Azure
- Surgery, Academy of Our Lady of Peace, San Diego, USA
| | - Melania Attar
- Surgery, Academy of Our Lady of Peace, San Diego, USA
| | - Melinda Gorges
- Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Liu XR, Liu F, Li ZW, Liu XY, Zhang W, Peng D. The risk of postoperative complications is higher in stage I-III colorectal cancer patients with previous abdominal surgery: a propensity score matching analysis. Clin Transl Oncol 2023; 25:3471-3478. [PMID: 37173570 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-023-03210-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to investigate whether previous abdominal surgery (PAS) affected stage I-III colorectal cancer (CRC) patients who underwent radical resection. METHODS Stage I-III CRC patients who received surgery at a single clinical center from Jan 2014 to Dec 2022 were retrospectively included in this study. Baseline characteristics and short-term outcomes were compared between the PAS group and the non-PAS group. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to find risk factors for overall complications and major complications. A 1:1 ratio propensity score matching (PSM) was used to minimize the selection bias between the two groups. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 22.0) software. RESULTS A total of 5895 stage I-III CRC patients were included according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The PAS group had 1336 (22.7%) patients, and the non-PAS group had 4559 (77.3%) patients. After the PSM, there were 1335 patients in each group, and no significant difference was found in all baseline characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). After comparing the short-term outcomes, the PAS group had a longer operation time (before PSM, P < 0.01; after PSM, P < 0.01) and more overall complications (before PSM, P = 0.027; after PSM, P = 0.022) whether before or after PSM. In univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses, PAS was an independent risk factor for overall complications (univariate analysis, P = 0.022; multivariate analysis, P = 0.029) but not for major complications (univariate analysis, P = 0.688). CONCLUSION Stage I-III CRC patients with PAS might experience longer operation time and have a higher risk of postoperative overall complications. However, it did not appear to significantly affect the major complications. Surgeons should take steps to improve surgical outcomes for patients with PAS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu-Rui Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Zi-Wei Li
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Xiao-Yu Liu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Wei Zhang
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Dong Peng
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Martin G, Montalva L, Paré S, Ali L, Martinez-Vinson C, Colas AE, Bonnard A. Robotic-assisted colectomy in children: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:2287-2295. [PMID: 37336840 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-023-01647-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colectomy in children. All children who underwent a colectomy with a laparoscopic (LapC) or robotic-assisted (RobC) approach in our institution (January 2010-March 2023) were included. Demographics, surgical data, and post-operative outcomes within 30 days were collected. Additional cost related to the robotic approach was calculated. Comparisons were performed using Fisher tests for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney tests for continuous variables. A total of 55 colectomies were performed: 31 LapC and 24 RobC (median age: 14.9 years). Main indications included: inflammatory bowel disease (n = 36, 65%), familial adenomatous polyposis (n = 6, 11%), sigmoid volvulus (n = 5, 9%), chronic intestinal pseudo-obstruction (n = 3, 5%). LapC included 22 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. RobC included 15 right, 4 left, and 5 total colectomies. Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with increased operative time (3 h vs 2.5 h, p = 0.02), with a median increase in operative time of 36 min. There were no conversions. Post-operative complications occurred in 35% of LapC and 38% of RobC (p = 0.99). Complications requiring treatment under general anesthesia (Clavien-Dindo 3) occurred in similar rates (23% in LapC vs 13% in RobC, p = 0.49). Length of hospitalization was 10 days in LapC and 8.5 days in RobC (p = 0.39). The robotic approach was associated with a median additional cost of 2156€ per surgery. Robotic-assisted colectomy is as safe and feasible as laparoscopic colectomy in children, with similar complication rates but increased operative times and cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Garance Martin
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France
- Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Louise Montalva
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France.
- Paris-Cité University, Paris, France.
| | - Stéphane Paré
- Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
- Management Control Department, Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Liza Ali
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France
| | | | - Anne-Emmanuelle Colas
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesia, Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Bonnard
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 Boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France
- Paris-Cité University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Ahuja V, Paredes LG, Leeds IL, Perkal MF, King JT. Clinical outcomes of elective robotic vs laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer utilizing a large national database. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7199-7205. [PMID: 37365394 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10215-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies have shown comparable outcomes between laparoscopic and robotic approaches across a range of surgeries; however, these have been limited in size. This study investigates differences in outcomes following robotic (RC) vs laparoscopic (LC) colectomy across several years utilizing a large national database. METHODS We analyzed data from ACS NSQIP for patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomies for colon cancer from 2012 to 2020. Inverse probability weighting with regression adjustment (IPWRA) incorporating demographics, operative factors, and comorbidities was used. Outcomes included mortality, complications, return to the operating room (OR), post-operative length of stay (LOS), operative time, readmission, and anastomotic leak. Secondary analysis was performed to further assess anastomotic leak rate following right and left colectomies. RESULTS We identified 83,841 patients who underwent elective minimally invasive colectomies: 14,122 (16.8%) RC and 69,719 (83.2%) LC. Patients who underwent RC were younger, more likely to be male, non-Hispanic White, with higher body mass index (BMI) and fewer comorbidities (for all, P < 0.05). After adjustment, there were no differences between RC and LC for 30-day mortality (0.8% vs 0.9% respectively, P = 0.457) or overall complications (16.9% vs 17.2%, P = 0.432). RC was associated with higher return to OR (5.1% vs 3.6%, P < 0.001), lower LOS (4.9 vs 5.1 days, P < 0.001), longer operative time (247 vs 184 min, P < 0.001), and higher rates of readmission (8.8% vs 7.2%, P < 0.001). Anastomotic leak rates were comparable for right-sided RC vs LC (2.1% vs 2.2%, P = 0.713), higher for left-sided LC (2.7%, P < 0.001), and highest for left-sided RC (3.4%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Robotic approach for elective colon cancer resection has similar outcomes to its laparoscopic counterpart. There were no differences in mortality or overall complications, however anastomotic leaks were highest after left RC. Further investigation is imperative to better understand the potential impact of technological advancement such as robotic surgery on patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vanita Ahuja
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Lucero G Paredes
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA.
- National Clinician Scholars Program, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, 06510-8088, USA.
- Department of Surgery, Maine Medical Center, Portland, ME, USA.
| | - Ira L Leeds
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Melissa F Perkal
- Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joseph T King
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, US Department of Veterans Affairs, West Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Del Conte F, Montalva L, Ali L, Langeron M, Colas AE, Bonnard A. Scarless laparoscopic incisions in Pfannenstiel (slip): the first 50 cases using an innovative approach in pediatric robotic surgery. J Robot Surg 2023; 17:215-221. [PMID: 35622191 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01419-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Incisions in the supra-pubic region have been described robotic-assisted surgery to improve cosmetic results in adults, but seldom in children. We aimed to present an innovative trocar placement in the Pfannenstiel line, named Scarless Laparoscopic Incisions in Pfannenstiel (SLIP), and evaluate its feasibility for various intra-abdominal procedures and its cosmetic results in pediatric robotic surgery. We performed a monocentric prospective study, including children undergoing robotic-assisted surgeries using a SLIP approach (July 2019-September 2021). Data regarding demographics, surgery, and outcome were collected and reported as median (range), or number (percentage). Cosmetic results were evaluated with a questionnaire. A SLIP approach was performed in 50 children (24 cholecystectomies, 12 splenectomies, 2 cholecystectomies and splenectomies, 9 colonic resections, 2 choledochal cyst resections, and 1 pancreatic pseudocyst resection). Median age was 11 years (2-18) and median weight 35 kg (10.5-80). Conversion to laparoscopy occurred in two cases. Post-operative complications occurred in 5 patients (10%), after colectomies [intrabdominal abscess (n = 3), stoma dysfunction (n = 1), parietal abscess (n = 1)], of which 3 (6%) required reintervention (intrabdominal abscess n = 2, stoma dysfunction n = 1). Regarding scars, 68% (n = 28) of parents and patients reported the maximal score of 5/5 for global satisfaction and 63% (n = 26) had all scars hidden by underwear. SLIP approach is versatile and can be used in supra- and infra-mesocolic robotic-assisted procedures. The low complication rate shows its safety in both young children and teenagers and does not increase operative difficulties. It results in high patient satisfaction regarding scars, and a scarless abdomen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fulvia Del Conte
- Department of Pediatric General Surgery and Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France.,Department of Pediatric General Surgery and Urology, University Hospital, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Louise Montalva
- Department of Pediatric General Surgery and Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France.,Paris Cité University, Paris, France
| | - Liza Ali
- Department of Pediatric General Surgery and Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France
| | - Margaux Langeron
- Department of Pediatric General Surgery and Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Emmanuelle Colas
- Department of Pediatric Anesthesiology, Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Arnaud Bonnard
- Department of Pediatric General Surgery and Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Robert-Debré Children University Hospital, 48 boulevard Sérurier, 75019, Paris, France. .,Paris Cité University, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Soliman SS, Flanagan J, Wang YH, Stopper PB, Rolandelli RH, Nemeth ZH. Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Colectomies Using the 2019 ACS NSQIP Database. South Med J 2022; 115:887-892. [DOI: 10.14423/smj.0000000000001479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
|
|
14
|
Palomba G, Dinuzzi VP, Capuano M, Anoldo P, Milone M, De Palma GD, Aprea G. Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients in terms of recovery time: a monocentric experience. J Robot Surg 2022; 16:981-987. [PMID: 34743288 PMCID: PMC8572529 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01332-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer has a great socio-sanitary relevance. It represents the third cancer by incidence and mortality. Ageing plays a major role in the development of colorectal cancer and this tumour, in patients aged 65 and older, has gradually increased over the past decade. The robotic technique is considered the evolution of conventional laparoscopy. Few studies evaluate the effects of robotic surgery in elderly patient, and even fewer are those that compare it with laparoscopic surgery in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery compared to laparoscopic colorectal surgery in patients older than 65 years. We conducted a retrospective study enrolling 83 elderly patients (age > 65) undergoing robotic and laparoscopic colectomy (32 and 51, respectively) between January 2019 and January 2021. For statistical analysis, p values were calculated using t test and chi-square test. p < 0.05 is the criterion for statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed with the Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) 2020 data analysis version 20.0.1 (Utah, USA). The operation time was higher in robotic left (p = 0.003, mean time 249.6 vs 211.7 min) and right (p = 0.004, mean time 238.5 vs 183.5 min) hemicolectomy and similar for procedures on rectosigmoid and rectum when compared to laparoscopic technique. In terms of length of hospital stay and recovery of bowel function, these values were significantly lower for robotic group in left hemicolectomy (p = 0.004), rectum (p = 0.003) and rectosigmoid (p = 0.003), while right hemicolectomy was similar in two groups (p = 0.26). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding conversion rate, postoperative complications, length of specimen, number of lymph nodes encountered and oncological results. Colorectal robotic surgery in elderly patients appears as a feasible and safe surgical approach when compared to the laparoscopic one, showing a shorter recovery and a reduction of length of stay with similar oncological outcomes even if with an increase of operating times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Palomba
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| | - Vincenza Paola Dinuzzi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Marianna Capuano
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Domenico De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Aprea
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University of Naples, Sergio Pansini 5, 80131, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Tschann P, Weigl MP, Lechner D, Mittelberger C, Jäger T, Gruber R, Girotti PNC, Mittermair C, Clemens P, Attenberger C, Szeverinski P, Brock T, Frick J, Emmanuel K, Königsrainer I, Presl J. Is Robotic Assisted Colorectal Cancer Surgery Equivalent Compared to Laparoscopic Procedures during the Introduction of a Robotic Program? A Propensity-Score Matched Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133208. [PMID: 35804985 PMCID: PMC9264883 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Revised: 06/26/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The introduction of a robotic program is challenging and requires extensive experience in minimally invasive surgery. Short-term outcomes and oncological quality should not differ between robotic and laparoscopic surgery. To our knowledge, no data on the quality of surgery at the time of introduction of the robotic platform are available. The aim of this study was to compare short-term outcomes and oncological findings of robotic-assisted colorectal resections with those of conventional laparoscopic surgery within the first three years after the introduction of the robotic platform. Abstract Background: Robotic surgery represents a novel approach for the treatment of colorectal cancers and has been established as an important and effective method over the last years. The aim of this work was to evaluate the effect of a robotic program on oncological findings compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery within the first three years after the introduction. Methods: All colorectal cancer patients from two centers that either received robotic-assisted or conventional laparoscopic surgery were included in a comparative study. A propensity-score-matched analysis was used to reduce confounding differences. Results: A laparoscopic resection (LR Group) was performed in 82 cases, and 93 patients were treated robotic-assisted surgery (RR Group). Patients’ characteristics did not differ between groups. In right-sided resections, an intracorporeal anastomosis was significantly more often performed in the RR Group (LR Group: 5 (26.31%) vs. RR Group: 10 (76.92%), p = 0.008). Operative time was shown to be significantly shorter in the LR Group (LR Group: 200 min (150–243) vs. 204 min (174–278), p = 0.045). Conversions to open surgery did occur more often in the LR Group (LR Group: 16 (19.51%) vs. RR Group: 5 (5.38%), p = 0.004). Postoperative morbidity, the number of harvested lymph nodes, quality of resection and postoperative tumor stage did not differ between groups. Conclusion: In this study, we could clearly demonstrate robotic-assisted colorectal cancer surgery as effective, feasible and safe regarding postoperative morbidity and oncological findings compared to conventional laparoscopy during the introduction of a robotic system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Tschann
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +43-(0)-5522-303-0; Fax: +43-(0)-5522-303-7505
| | - Markus P. Weigl
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Daniel Lechner
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Christa Mittelberger
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Tarkan Jäger
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| | - Ricarda Gruber
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| | - Paolo N. C. Girotti
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Christof Mittermair
- Department of Surgery, St. John of God Hospital, Teaching Hospital of Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria;
| | - Patrick Clemens
- Department of Radio-Oncology, Academic Teaching Hospital, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria;
| | - Christian Attenberger
- Private University in the Principality of Liechtenstein, 9495 Triesen, Liechtenstein;
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria;
| | - Philipp Szeverinski
- Institute of Medical Physics, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria;
| | - Thomas Brock
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Jürgen Frick
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| | - Ingmar Königsrainer
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital Feldkirch, Carinagasse 47, 6800 Feldkirch, Austria; (M.P.W.); (D.L.); (C.M.); (P.N.C.G.); (T.B.); (J.F.); (I.K.)
| | - Jaroslav Presl
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), 5020 Salzburg, Austria; (T.J.); (R.G.); (K.E.); (J.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Huang P, Li S, Li P, Jia B. The Learning Curve of Da Vinci Robot-Assisted Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Retrospective Study of 76 Cases at a Single Center. Front Surg 2022; 9:897103. [PMID: 35846959 PMCID: PMC9276975 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.897103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims Robotic-assisted right hemicolectomy (RARH) has many benefits in treating colon cancer, but it is a new technology that needs to be evaluated. This study aims to assess the learning curve (LC) of RARH procedures with the complete mesoscopic exception and D3 lymph node dissection for colon carcinoma. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed on a consecutive series of 76 patients who underwent RARH from July 2014 to March 2018. The operation time was evaluated using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) method to analyze the LC. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the LC: Phase I and Phase II. Statistical methods were used to compare clinicopathological data on intraoperative and perioperative outcomes at different stages of the study. Results The peak point of the LC was observed in the 27th case. Using the CUSUM method, we divide the LC into two stages. Stage 1 (initial learning stage): Cases 1–27 and Stage 2 (proficiency phase): Cases 28–76. There were no obvious distinctions between the two patients’ essential characteristics (age, sex, body mass index, clinical stage, and ASA score). The mean operation time of each group is 187.37 ± 45.56 min and 161.1 ± 37.74 min (P = 0.009), respectively. The intraoperative blood loss of each group is 170.4 ± 217.2 ml and 95.7 ± 72.8 ml (P = 0.031), respectively. Conclusion Based on the LC with CUSUM analysis, the data suggest that the learning phase of RARH was achieved after 27 cases. The operation time and the intraoperative blood loss decrease with more cases performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pu Huang
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Sen Li
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Baoqing Jia
- Medical School of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China
- Department of General Surgery, the First Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
- Correspondence: Baoqing Jia
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Robotic and laparoscopic surgical procedures for colorectal cancer. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:375-381. [PMID: 35687279 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01418-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
The study aims to investigate perioperative indices and immediate outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic surgical interventions in colorectal cancer patients. The study included 163 patients [90 (55.2%) females and 73 (44.8%) males, aged 67.46 ± 6.72 years, on average] who had surgery for morphologically checked colorectal cancer. Of those, 101 patients had laparoscopic surgery (Group 1), and 62 patients had robot-assisted surgery (Group 2). The study found that the safety profile of both robot and laparoscopic procedures for colorectal cancer is comparable. The total complication rate in the laparoscopic group was 6.9% (in 7 patients), in the robot-assisted group-11.3% (in 7 patients) (χ2 = 0.93, p = 0.34). Robotic surgery for colorectal cancer is a promising direction for improving patients' level and quality of care with this oncological pathology.
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Minimally Invasive Surgery Approach is Not Associated With Differences in Long-Term Bowel Function Patient-Reported Outcomes After Elective Sigmoid Colectomy. J Surg Res 2022; 274:85-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.12.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 12/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
|
19
|
Donlon NE, Nugent TS, Free R, Hafeez A, Kalbassi R, Neary PC, O'Riordain DS. Robotic versus laparoscopic anterior resections for rectal and rectosigmoid cancer: an institutional experience. Ir J Med Sci 2022; 191:845-851. [PMID: 33846946 DOI: 10.1007/s11845-021-02625-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal surgery has evolved with the advent of laparoscopic techniques and now robotic-assisted surgery. There is significant literature supporting the use of laparoscopic techniques over open surgery with evidence of enhanced post-operative recovery, reduced use of opioids, smaller incisions and equivalent oncological outcomes. Robotic minimally invasive surgery addresses some of the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, providing surgical precision and improvements in perception and dexterity with a resulting decrease in tissue damage. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent robotic-assisted anterior resection for cancer of the rectum or rectosigmoid junction in our institution since our robotic programme began in 2017. Patient demographics were identified via electronic databases and patient charts. A matched cohort of laparoscopic cases was identified. RESULTS A total of 51 consecutive robotic-assisted anterior resections were identified and case matched with laparoscopic resections for comparison. Robotic-assisted surgery was associated with a shorter length of stay (p = 0.04), reduced initial post-operative analgesia requirements (p < 0.01) and no significant difference in time to bowel movement or stoma functioning (p = 0.84). All patients had an R0 resection, and there was no statistical difference in lymph node yield between the groups (p = 0.14). Robotic surgery was associated with a longer operative duration (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION In this early experience, robotic surgery has proven feasible and safe and is comparable to laparoscopic surgery in terms of completeness of resection and recovery. As costs and operating times decline and as technology progresses, robotic surgery may one day replace traditional laparoscopic techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noel E Donlon
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Tim S Nugent
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ross Free
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Adnan Hafeez
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Resa Kalbassi
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul C Neary
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beacon Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Mueller AN, Vossler JD, Yim NH, Harbison GJ, Murayama KM. Predictors and Consequences of Unplanned Conversion to Open During Robotic Colectomy: An ACS-NSQIP Database Analysis. HAWAI'I JOURNAL OF HEALTH & SOCIAL WELFARE 2021; 80:3-9. [PMID: 34820629 PMCID: PMC8609196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Robotic-assisted surgery has become a desired modality for performing colectomy; however, unplanned conversion to an open procedure may be associated with worse outcomes. The purpose of this study is to examine predictors and consequences of unplanned conversion to open in a large, high fidelity data set. A retrospective analysis of 11 061 robotic colectomies was conducted using the American College of Surgeons - National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) 2012-2017 database. Predictors of conversion and the effect of conversion on outcomes were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression resulting in risk-adjusted odds ratios of conversion and morbidity/mortality. Overall, 10 372 (93.8%) patients underwent successful robotic colectomy, and 689 (6.2%) had an unplanned conversion. Predictors of conversion included age ≥ 65 years, male gender, obesity, functional status not independent, American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) classification IV-V, non-oncologic indication, emergency case, smoking, recent weight loss, bleeding disorder, and preoperative organ space infection. Conversion is an independent risk factor for mortality, overall morbidity, cardiac morbidity, pulmonary morbidity, renal morbidity, venous thromboembolism morbidity, wound morbidity, sepsis, bleeding, readmission, return to the operating room, and extended length of stay (LOS). Unplanned conversion to open during robotic colectomy is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew N. Mueller
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI (ANM, JDV, KMM)
| | - John D. Vossler
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI (ANM, JDV, KMM)
| | - Nicholas H. Yim
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI (NHY, GJH)
| | - Gregory J. Harbison
- John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI (NHY, GJH)
| | - Kenric M. Murayama
- Department of Surgery, John A. Burns School of Medicine, University of Hawai‘i, Honolulu, HI (ANM, JDV, KMM)
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Rückbeil O, Sebestyen U, Schlick T, Krüger CM. [Structured Implementation and Modular In-house Training as Key Success Factors in Robotically Assisted Surgery - Evaluation Using the Example of Colorectal Surgery]. Zentralbl Chir 2021; 147:35-41. [PMID: 34607387 DOI: 10.1055/a-1552-4236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To demonstrate the applicability of structured implementation of robotic assisted surgery (RAS) and to evaluate a modular training procedure during the implementation phase in in-house mentoring. METHOD Execution of a self-defined PDCA (PDCA: Plan-Do-Check-Act) implementation cycle accompanied by prospective data collection of patient characteristics, operation times, complications, conversion rates and postoperative length of stay of a modularly defined training operation (robotic assisted rectosigmoid resection - RARSR). RESULTS Evaluation of 100 consecutive cases distributed among 3 trainees and an in-house mentor as internal control group. Presentation of qualitatively safe and successful implementation with a short learning curve of the training operation with balanced patient characteristics. CONCLUSIONS Structured implementation enables the safe introduction of RAS in visceral surgery. In this context, modular training operations can facilitate the adoption of RAS by users under everyday conditions. For the first time, we demonstrate this within an in-house mentoring approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oskar Rückbeil
- Chirurgie/Zentrum für Robotik, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Uwe Sebestyen
- Chirurgie/Zentrum für Robotik, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Tilman Schlick
- Chirurgie/Zentrum für Robotik, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| | - Colin M Krüger
- Chirurgie/Zentrum für Robotik, Immanuel Klinik Rüdersdorf, Rüdersdorf bei Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Nasseri Y, Kasheri E, Oka K, Cox B, Cohen J, Ellenhorn J, Barnajian M. Minimally invasive right versus left colectomy for cancer: does robotic surgery mitigate differences in short-term outcomes? J Robot Surg 2021; 16:875-881. [PMID: 34581955 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-021-01310-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Studies comparing right (RC) and left colectomies (LC) show higher rates of ileus in RC and higher wound infection and anastomotic leak rates in LC. However, prior studies did not include robotic procedures. We compared short-term outcomes of laparoscopic and robotic RC and LC for cancer, with sub-analysis of robotic procedures. In a retrospective review of a prospective database, preoperative factors, intraoperative events, and 30-day postoperative outcomes were compared. Student's t tests and Chi-square tests were used for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. A logistic binomial regression was performed to assess whether type of surgery was associated with postoperative complications. Between January 2014 and August 2020, 115 patients underwent minimally invasive RC or LC for cancer. Sixty-eight RC [30 (44.1%) laparoscopic, 38 (55.9%) robotic] and 47 LC [13 (27.6%) laparoscopic, 34 (72.4%) robotic] cases were included. On univariate analysis, RC patients had significantly higher overall postoperative complications but no differences in rates of ileus/small bowel obstruction, wound infection, time to first flatus/bowel movement, length of hospital stay, and 30-day readmissions. On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in overall complications and laparoscopic surgery had a 2.5 times higher likelihood of complications than robotic surgery. In sub-analysis of robotic cases, there was no significant difference among all outcome variables. Previously reported outcome differences between laparoscopic RC and LC for cancer may be mitigated by robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yosef Nasseri
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street, Suite 880W, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA. .,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Eli Kasheri
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street, Suite 880W, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Kimberly Oka
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street, Suite 880W, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Brian Cox
- Department of Pathology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason Cohen
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street, Suite 880W, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.,Department of General Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Joshua Ellenhorn
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street, Suite 880W, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.,Department of Surgical Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Moshe Barnajian
- Surgery Group of Los Angeles, 8635 West 3rd Street, Suite 880W, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.,Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Gunnells D, Cannon J. Robotic Surgery in Crohn's Disease. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2021; 34:286-291. [PMID: 34512197 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1729862] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Surgery for Crohn's disease presents unique challenges secondary to the inflammatory nature of the disease. While a minimally invasive approach to colorectal surgery has consistently been associated with better patient outcomes, adoption of laparoscopy in Crohn's disease has been limited due to these challenges. Robotic assisted surgery has the potential to overcome these challenges and allow more complex patients to undergo a minimally invasive operation. Here we describe our approach to robotic assisted surgery for terminal ileal Crohn's disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Drew Gunnells
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jamie Cannon
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Update on Robotic Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:jpm11090900. [PMID: 34575677 PMCID: PMC8472541 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11090900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2021] [Revised: 09/04/2021] [Accepted: 09/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The minimally invasive treatment of rectal cancer with Total Mesorectal Excision is a complex and challenging procedure due to technical and anatomical issues which could impair postoperative, oncological and functional outcomes, especially in a defined subgroup of patients. The results from recent randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery are still conflicting and trans-anal bottom-up approaches have recently been developed. Robotic surgery represents the latest consistent innovation in the field of minimally invasive surgery that may potentially overcome the technical limitations of conventional laparoscopy thanks to an enhanced dexterity, especially in deep narrow operative fields such as the pelvis. Results from population-based multicenter studies have shown the potential advantages of robotic surgery when compared to its laparoscopic counterpart in terms of reduced conversions, complication rates and length of stay. Costs, often advocated as one of the main drawbacks of robotic surgery, should be thoroughly evaluated including both the direct and indirect costs, with the latter having the potential of counterbalancing the excess of expenditure directly related to the purchase and maintenance of robotic equipment. Further prospectively maintained or randomized data are still required to better delineate the advantages of the robotic platform, especially in the subset of most complex and technically challenging patients from both an anatomical and oncological standpoint.
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Tagliabue F, Burati M, Chiarelli M, Cioffi U, Zago M. Robotic surgery in colon cancer: current evidence and future perspectives – narrative review. Artif Intell Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 2:110-116. [DOI: 10.37126/aige.v2.i4.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
|
|
26
|
McGuirk M, Gachabayov M, Rojas A, Kajmolli A, Gogna S, Gu KW, Qiuye Q, Dong XD. Simultaneous Robot Assisted Colon and Liver Resection for Metastatic Colon Cancer. JSLS 2021; 25:JSLS.2020.00108. [PMID: 34248343 PMCID: PMC8249220 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2020.00108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Simultaneous robot assisted colon and liver resections are being performed more frequently at present due to the expanded adoption of the robotic platform for surgical management of metastatic colon cancer. However, this approach has not been studied in detail with only case series available in the literature. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the current body of evidence on the feasibility of performing simultaneous robotic colon and liver resections. Methods A systematic review was performed through PubMed to identify relevant articles describing simultaneous colon and liver resections for metastatic colon cancer. Results A total of 28 patients underwent simultaneous resections robotically with an average operative time of 420.3 minutes and average blood loss of 275.6 ml. Postoperative stay was 8.6 days on average with all cases achieving negative surgical margins. Conclusions Robotic simultaneous resection of colorectal cancer with liver metastases is technically feasible and seems oncologically equivalent to open or laparoscopic surgery. Further studies are urgently needed to assess benefits of robotic surgery in the patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew McGuirk
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Mahir Gachabayov
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Aram Rojas
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Agon Kajmolli
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Shekhar Gogna
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Katie W Gu
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center/New York Medical College
| | - Qian Qiuye
- Department of Surgery, Nuvance Health-Whittingham Cancer Center
| | - Xiang Da Dong
- Department of Surgery, Nuvance Health-Whittingham Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Grosek J, Ales Kosir J, Sever P, Erculj V, Tomazic A. Robotic versus laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a case-control study. Radiol Oncol 2021; 55:433-438. [PMID: 34051705 PMCID: PMC8647796 DOI: 10.2478/raon-2021-0026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic resections represent a novel approach to treatment of colorectal cancer. The aim of our study was to critically assess the implementation of robotic colorectal surgical program at our institution and to compare it to the established laparoscopically assisted surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS A retrospective case-control study was designed to compare outcomes of consecutively operated patients who underwent elective laparoscopic or robotic colorectal resections at a tertiary academic centre from 2019 to 2020. The associations between patient characteristics, type of operation, operation duration, conversions, duration of hospitalization, complications and number of harvested lymph nodes were assessed by using univariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS A total of 83 operations met inclusion criteria, 46 robotic and 37 laparoscopic resections, respectively. The groups were comparable regarding the patient and operative characteristics. The operative time was longer in the robotic group (p < 0.001), with fewer conversions to open surgery (p = 0.004), with less patients in need of transfusions (p = 0.004) and lower reoperation rate (p = 0.026). There was no significant difference between the length of stay (p = 0.17), the number of harvested lymph nodes (p = 0.24) and the overall complications (p = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS The short-term results of robotic colorectal resections were comparable to the laparoscopically assisted operations with fewer conversions to open surgery, fewer blood transfusions and lower reoperation rate in the robotic group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Grosek
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jurij Ales Kosir
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primoz Sever
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Vanja Erculj
- Faculty of Criminal Justice and Security, University of Maribor, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Ales Tomazic
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Ljubljana University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
- Medical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Grass F, Merchea A, Mathis KL, Mishra N, Heien H, Sangaralingham LR, Larson DW. Cost drivers of locally advanced rectal cancer treatment-An analysis of a leading healthcare insurer. J Surg Oncol 2021; 123:1023-1029. [PMID: 33497477 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Revised: 01/01/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the economic burden of locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treatment from a society perspective through analysis of health insurance-derived data of commercially insured and Medicare Advantage (MA) patients. METHODS Retrospective cost analysis of patients undergoing rectal resection within a multimodal (neoadjuvant chemoradiation + adjuvant chemotherapy) treatment strategy between January 1, 2010 and October 31, 2018, using the claims OptumLabs Data Warehouse database. RESULTS In total, 1738 (935 commercial and 803 MA) patients were included. Overall treatment costs totaled $230,881,746 (on average $183 653 ± 82 384 per commercially insured and $73 681 ± 32 917 per MA patient). Cost distribution according to category (commercially insured patients) was: 29.92% related to outpatient care (follow-up visits/diagnostics), radiotherapy: 21.83%, index resection: 20.62%, chemotherapy: 17.44%, surgical inpatient: 6.32%, medical inpatient: 3.28%, emergency room: 0.58%. Relative cost distribution of the index resection itself differed marginally between the three approaches and was 21.49% for open, 19.30% for laparoscopic, and 20.93% for robotic surgery. Relative cost distributions of neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and outpatient treatments remained unchanged, independently of the surgical approach. This representation was similar in MA patients. CONCLUSION Index-surgery related costs were outweighed by costs related to oncological and outpatient workup/follow-up treatments independently of both surgical approach and insurance type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabian Grass
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.,Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Amit Merchea
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Kellie L Mathis
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nitin Mishra
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Herbert Heien
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Lindsey R Sangaralingham
- Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - David W Larson
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Mathis-Ullrich F, Scheikl PM. [Robots in the operating room-(co)operation during surgery]. GASTROENTEROLOGE 2020; 16:25-34. [PMID: 33362879 PMCID: PMC7753502 DOI: 10.1007/s11377-020-00496-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Hintergrund Medizinrobotik birgt das Potenzial, chirurgische oder endoluminale Eingriffe zu verbessern, indem diese Technologie hochpräzise Bewegungen und übermenschliche Perzeption ermöglicht. Ziel der Arbeit Darstellung historischer, existierender und zukünftiger robotischer Assistenten sowie Herausstellung deren Auswirkungen auf die robotische Chirurgie und Endoskopie. Methoden Insbesondere werden historische Medizinroboter sowie konventionelle Telemanipulatoren vorgestellt und diese mit minimal-invasiven Kontinuumsrobotern und neuartigen robotischen Konzepten aus Praxis und Forschung verglichen. Zusätzlich wird eine Perspektive für die zukünftige Generation von Chirurgie- und Endoskopierobotern geboten. Schlussfolgerung Roboterassistierte Medizin bietet einen großen Mehrwert für die Qualität der Intervention sowie Sicherheit für Chirurgen und Patientinnen. Zukünftig werden vermehrt Prozessschritte (teil‑)autonom in Kooperation mit Experten durchgeführt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Mathis-Ullrich
- Institut für Anthropomatik und Robotik (IAR), Health Robotics and Automation Laboratory (HERA), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 8, 76131 Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| | - P M Scheikl
- Institut für Anthropomatik und Robotik (IAR), Health Robotics and Automation Laboratory (HERA), Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT), Engler-Bunte-Ring 8, 76131 Karlsruhe, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Formisano G, Giuliani G, Salaj A, Salvischiani L, Ferraro L, Luca MD, Bianchi PP. Robotic elective colectomy for diverticular disease: short-term outcomes of 80 patients. Int J Med Robot 2020; 17:e2204. [PMID: 33185931 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2020] [Revised: 10/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the impact of the robotic approach on the minimally invasive elective treatment of diverticular disease. METHODS Data from patients who underwent elective robotic colectomy for diverticular disease from January 2015 to February 2020 were prospectively collected and retrospectively analysed. Intraoperative and 30-day postoperative outcomes were the variables assessed. RESULTS A total of 80 patients (71% with prior complicated diverticulitis) met the inclusion criteria. Mean operative time was 241 min, one intraoperative complication (1.2%) was observed, the conversion rate was 2.5%. Mean hospital stay was 6.4 days and overall 30-day complication rate was 22.5%. Fourteen patients (17.5%) had minor complications, while major postoperative complications occurred in four patients (5%). Anastomotic leak rate was 3.9% and the 30-day readmission rate was 3.7%. CONCLUSIONS Robotic colectomy for diverticular disease has proven to be feasible and safe, with low intraoperative complications, conversion, and anastomotic leak rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giampaolo Formisano
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giuliani
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Adelona Salaj
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Lucia Salvischiani
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Luca Ferraro
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, "Federico II" University, Naples, Italy
| | - Martina De Luca
- Department of Surgery, Andosilla Hospital AUSL Viterbo, Viterbo, Italy
| | - Paolo Pietro Bianchi
- Department of General and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Richards HW, Kulaylat AN, Cooper JN, McLeod DJ, Diefenbach KA, Michalsky MP. Trends in robotic surgery utilization across tertiary children’s hospitals in the United States. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6066-6072. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08098-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2020] [Accepted: 10/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
|
32
|
Hospital robotic use for colorectal cancer care. J Robot Surg 2020; 15:561-569. [PMID: 32876922 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-020-01142-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
The use of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer continues to increase. However, not all organizations offer patients the option of robotic intervention. This study seeks to understand organizational characteristics associated with the utilization of robotic surgery for colorectal cancer. We conducted a retrospective study of hospitals identified in the United States, State of Florida Inpatient Discharge Dataset, and linked data for those hospitals with the American Hospital Association Survey, Area Health Resource File and the Health Community Health Assessment Resource Tool Set. The study population included all robotic surgeries for colorectal cancer patients in 159 hospitals from 2013 to 2015. Logistic regressions identifying organizational, community, and combined community and organizational variables were utilized to determine associations. Results indicate that neither hospital competition nor disease burden in the community was associated with increased odds of robotic surgery use. However, per capita income (OR 1.07 95% CI 1.02, 1.12), average total margin (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.001, 1.02) and large-sized hospitals compared to small hospitals (OR: 5.26, 95% CI 1.13, 24.44) were associated with increased odds of robotic use. This study found that market conditions within the U.S. State of Florida are not primary drivers of hospital use of robotic surgery. The ability for the population to pay for such services, and the hospital resources available to absorb the expense of purchasing the required equipment, appear to be more influential.
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Moloney R, O’Brien B, Coffey JC, Coffey A, Murphy F. Patients' Perceptions After Robot‐Assisted Surgery: An Integrative Review. AORN J 2020; 112:133-141. [DOI: 10.1002/aorn.13104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2019] [Revised: 06/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|
|
34
|
Abstract
The global numbers of robotic gastrointestinal surgeries are increasing. However, the evidence base for robotic gastrointestinal surgery does not yet support its widespread adoption or justify its cost. The reasons for its continued popularity are complex, but a notable driver is the push for innovation - robotic surgery is seen as a compelling solution for delivering on the promise of minimally invasive precision surgery - and a changing commercial landscape delivers the promise of increased affordability. Novel systems will leverage the robot as a data-driven platform, integrating advances in imaging, artificial intelligence and machine learning for decision support. However, if this vision is to be realized, lessons must be heeded from current clinical trials and translational strategies, which have failed to demonstrate patient benefit. In this Perspective, we critically appraise current research to define the principles on which the next generation of gastrointestinal robotics trials should be based. We also discuss the emerging commercial landscape and define existing and new technologies.
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Abstract
The role of robotics in colon and rectal surgery has been established as an important and effective tool for the surgeon. Its inherent technologies have provided for increased visualization and ease of dissection in the minimally invasive approach to surgery. The value of the robot is apparent in the more challenging aspects of colon and rectal procedures, including the intracorporeal anastomosis for right colectomies and the low pelvic dissection for benign and malignant diseases.
Collapse
|
|
36
|
The Impact of Corporate Payments on Robotic Surgery Research: A Systematic Review. Ann Surg 2019; 269:389-396. [PMID: 30067545 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To quantify the influence of financial conflict of interest (COI) payments on the reporting of clinical results for robotic surgery. DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION A systematic search (Ovid MEDLINE databases) was conducted (May 2017) to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the efficacy of the da Vinci robot on clinical outcomes. Financial COI data for authors (per study) were determined using open payments database. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Primary outcomes assessed were receipt of financial COI payments and overall conclusion reported between robotic versus comparative approach. Quality/risk of bias was assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS)/Cochrane risk of bias tool. Disclosure discrepancies were also analyzed. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Study characteristics, surgical subspecialty, methodological assessment, reporting of disclosure statements, and study findings dual abstracted. The association of the amount of financial support received as a predictor of reporting positive findings associated robotic surgery was assessed at various cut-offs of dollar amount received by receiver operating curve (ROC). RESULTS Thirty-three studies were included, 9 RCTs and 24 observational studies. There was a median, 111 patients (range 10 to 6420) across studies. A little more than half (17/33) had a conclusion statement reporting positive results in support of robotic surgery, with 48% (16/33) reporting results not in favor [equivocal: 12/33 (36%), negative: 4/33 (12%)]. Nearly all (91%) studies had authors who received financial COI payments, with a median of $3364.46 per study (range $9 to $1,775,378.03). ROC curve demonstrated that studies receiving greater than $9557.31 (cutpoint) were more likely to report positive robotic surgery results (sensitivity: 0.65, specificity: 0.81, area under the curve: 0.73). Studies with financial COI payment greater than this amount were more likely to report beneficial outcomes with robotic surgery [(78.57% vs 31.58%, P = 0.013) with an odds ratio of 2.07 (confidence interval: 0.47-3.67; P = 0.011)]. Overall, studies were high quality/low risk of bias [median NOS: 8 (range 5 to 9)]; Cochrane risk: "low risk" (9/9, 100%)]. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE Financial COI sponsorship appears to be associated with a higher likelihood of studies reporting a benefit of robotic surgery. Our findings suggest a dollar amount where financial payments influence reported clinical results, a concept that challenges the current guidelines, which do not account for the amount of COI funding received.
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease decreases inpatient opioid use: Results of a propensity score-matched study. Am J Surg 2019; 220:421-427. [PMID: 31810518 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2019.11.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery are at high risk for postoperative opioid use. METHODS We evaluated inpatient opioid use among patients undergoing sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease from the Premier Hospital Database and compared across surgical approaches using propensity score-matching analysis. RESULTS After the day of surgery, minimally invasive (MIS) patients were administered significantly lower doses of parenteral opioids (median daily morphine milligram equivalents [MME]: 33.3 versus 48.3, p < 0.001). Within MIS, significantly less parenteral opioids were used by the robotic-assisted (RS) than the laparoscopic (LS) group (median daily MME: 30.0 versus 36.8, p = 0.012). MIS patients were more likely than open to start oral opioids on the day of surgery (MIS vs. OS: 8.7% vs. 6.6%, p < 0.001; RS vs. LS: 12.6% vs. 10.2%, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION Minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease was associated with less postoperative parenteral opioid use and starting oral opioids sooner after surgery compared to the open approach.
Collapse
|
|
38
|
Mika A, Kaska L, Proczko-Stepaniak M, Chomiczewska A, Swierczynski J, Smolenski RT, Sledzinski T. Evidence That the Length of Bile Loop Determines Serum Bile Acid Concentration and Glycemic Control After Bariatric Surgery. Obes Surg 2019; 28:3405-3414. [PMID: 29790128 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-018-3314-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bariatric surgery contributes to the improvement in glucose metabolism that may be related to a postoperative increase in serum bile acids (BAs). Three commonly used types of bariatric procedures, laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) (without creation of a bile loop), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and omega-loop gastric bypass (OLGB) (with creation of shorter 100-150 cm and longer 200-280 cm bile loops, respectively), differ in their effects on glycemic control. The aim of the study was to compare the effects of various bariatric procedures on serum BA concentration and glucose homeostasis. METHODS Serum BAs in 26 obese patients were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry prior to bariatric surgery, as well as 4 days and 3 months thereafter. RESULTS Four days after the surgery, serum concentrations of BAs in LSG and OLGB groups were similar as prior to the procedure, and a slight decrease in serum BAs was observed in the RYGB group. Serum BA level in the LSG group remained unchanged also at 3 months after the surgery, whereas a significant 0.5- and 3-fold increase in this parameter was noted in the RYGB and OLGB groups, respectively. Serum concentration of BAs correlated positively with the length of the bile loop (R = 0.47, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION The evident improvement of glycemic control observed 3 months after OLGB might be associated with a postoperative increase in serum BAs, resulting from their better absorption from the longer bile loop. However, the changes in serum BAs probably had little or no impact on insulin sensitivity improvement at 4 days post-surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana Mika
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland
- Department of Environmental Analysis, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, 63 Wita Stwosza, 80-308, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Lukasz Kaska
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, 17 Smoluchowskiego, 80-214, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Monika Proczko-Stepaniak
- Department of General, Endocrine and Transplant Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, 17 Smoluchowskiego, 80-214, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Chomiczewska
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Julian Swierczynski
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland
- State School of Higher Vocational Education in Koszalin, 1 Lesna, 75-582, Koszalin, Poland
| | - Ryszard T Smolenski
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland
| | - Tomasz Sledzinski
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biochemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Gdansk, 1 Debinki, 80-211, Gdansk, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Fieber JH, Kuo LE, Wirtalla C, Kelz RR. Variation in the utilization of robotic surgical operations. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:593-599. [PMID: 31560125 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01003-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 07/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The appropriate use of the robot in surgery continues to evolve. Robotic operations (RO) are particularly advantageous for deep pelvic and retroperitoneal procedures, but the implementation of RO is unknown. We aimed to examine regional variation for the most commonly performed RO in general, gynecologic, and urologic surgery. A three-state inpatient database from 2008 to 2011 was used. Nine common robotic inpatient general, gynecologic and urologic surgery procedures were analyzed. States were divided into hospital service areas (HSAs). The percentage of RO was calculated for each operation. Hospital service areas that had < 50% or > 150% of the RO average were outliers. Hospital service areas were compared based on demographics, patterns of adoption, variation in usage, and association with population, physician and hospital density. Hysterectomies were the procedure that was performed most often robotically. Over 50% of radical prostatectomies were performed robotically. Procedures with the highest rate of RO performance were performed with the least variation. Characteristics that were significantly correlated with RO included provider and hospital density. Variation in the utilization of RO is common and differs by operation. Physician density impacts access to care and is associated with the variation in use of RO depending on procedure type. Further research is needed to understand the causes of variation and adoption of RO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer H Fieber
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Lindsay E Kuo
- Department of Surgery, Temple University, 3401 North Broad Street, Philadelphia, 19140, PA, USA
| | - Chris Wirtalla
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| | - Rachel R Kelz
- Department of Surgery, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Richards CR, Steele SR, Lustik MB, Gillern SM, Lim RB, Brady JT, Althans AR, Schlussel AT. Safe surgery in the elderly: A review of outcomes following robotic proctectomy from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample in a cross-sectional study. Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2019; 44:39-45. [PMID: 31312442 PMCID: PMC6610645 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As our nation's population ages, operating on older and sicker patients occurs more frequently. Robotic operations have been thought to bridge the gap between a laparoscopic and an open approach, especially in more complex cases like proctectomy. Methods Our objective was to evaluate the use and outcomes of robotic proctectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer in the elderly. A retrospective cross-sectional cohort study utilizing the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS; 2006-2013) was performed. All cases were restricted to age 70 years old or greater. Results We identified 6740 admissions for rectal cancer including: 5879 open, 666 laparoscopic, and 195 robotic procedures. The median age was 77 years old. The incidence of a robotic proctectomy increased by 39%, while the open approach declined by 6% over the time period studied. Median (interquartile range) length of stay was shorter for robotic procedures at 4.3 (3-7) days, compared to laparoscopic 5.8 (4-8) and open at 6.7 (5-10) days (p < 0.01), while median total hospital charges were greater in the robotic group compared to laparoscopic and open cases ($64,743 vs. $55,813 vs. $50,355, respectively, p < 0.01). There was no significant difference in the risk of total complications between the different approaches following multivariate analysis. Conclusion Robotic proctectomy was associated with a shorter LOS, and this may act as a surrogate marker for an overall improvement in adverse events. These results demonstrate that a robotic approach is a safe and feasible option, and should not be discounted solely based on age or comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carly R. Richards
- Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, United States
- Corresponding author. 1 Jarrett White Road, Honolulu, HI, 96859, United States.
| | - Scott R. Steele
- Department of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Michael B. Lustik
- Department of Clinical Investigations, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, United States
| | - Suzanne M. Gillern
- Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, United States
| | - Robert B. Lim
- Department of Surgery, Tripler Army Medical Center, Honolulu, HI, United States
| | - Justin T. Brady
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Ali R. Althans
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Andrew T. Schlussel
- Department of Surgery, Madigan Army Medical Center, Tacoma, WA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Robinson NL, Cottier TV, Kavanagh DJ. Psychosocial Health Interventions by Social Robots: Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13203. [PMID: 31094357 PMCID: PMC6533873 DOI: 10.2196/13203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Social robots that can communicate and interact with people offer exciting opportunities for improved health care access and outcomes. However, evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on health or well-being outcomes has not yet been clearly synthesized across all health domains where social robots have been tested. Objective This study aimed to undertake a systematic review examining current evidence from RCTs on the effects of psychosocial interventions by social robots on health or well-being. Methods Medline, PsycInfo, ScienceDirect, Scopus, and Engineering Village searches across all years in the English language were conducted and supplemented by forward and backward searches. The included papers reported RCTs that assessed changes in health or well-being from interactions with a social robot across at least 2 measurement occasions. Results Out of 408 extracted records, 27 trials met the inclusion criteria: 6 in child health or well-being, 9 in children with autism spectrum disorder, and 12 with older adults. No trials on adolescents, young adults, or other problem areas were identified, and no studies had interventions where robots spontaneously modified verbal responses based on speech by participants. Most trials were small (total N=5 to 415; median=34), only 6 (22%) reported any follow-up outcomes (2 to 12 weeks; median=3.5) and a single-blind assessment was reported in 8 (31%). More recent trials tended to have greater methodological quality. All papers reported some positive outcomes from robotic interventions, although most trials had some measures that showed no difference or favored alternate treatments. Conclusions Controlled research on social robots is at an early stage, as is the current range of their applications to health care. Research on social robot interventions in clinical and health settings needs to transition from exploratory investigations to include large-scale controlled trials with sophisticated methodology, to increase confidence in their efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole Lee Robinson
- Australian Centre for Robotic Vision, Brisbane, Australia.,Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease. Surg Endosc 2019; 34:598-609. [PMID: 31062152 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06804-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2018] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Benefits of minimally invasive surgical approaches to diverticular disease are limited by conversion to open surgery. A comprehensive analysis that includes risk factors for conversion may improve patient outcomes. METHODS The US Premier Healthcare Database was used to identify patients undergoing primary elective sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease between 2013 and September 2015. Propensity-score matching was used to compare conversion rates for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted sigmoidectomy. Patient, clinical, hospital, and surgeon characteristics associated with conversion were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression, providing odds ratios for comparative risks. Clinical and economic impacts were assessed comparing surgical outcomes in minimally invasive converted, completed, and open cases. RESULTS The study population included 13,240 sigmoidectomy patients (8076 laparoscopic, 1301 robotic-assisted, 3863 open). Analysis of propensity-score-matched patients showed higher conversion rates in laparoscopic (13.6%) versus robotic-assisted (8.3%) surgeries (p < 0.001). Greater risk of conversion was associated with patients who were Black compared with Caucasian, were Medicaid-insured versus Commercially insured, had a Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥ 2 versus 0, were obese, had concomitant colon resection, had peritoneal abscess or fistula, or had lysis of adhesions. Significantly lower risk of conversion was associated with robotic-assisted sigmoidectomy (versus laparoscopic, OR 0.58), hand-assisted surgery, higher surgeon volume, and surgeons who were colorectal specialties. Converted cases had longer operating room time, length of stay, and more postoperative complications compared with minimally invasive completed and open cases. Readmission and blood transfusion rates were higher in converted compared with minimally invasive completed cases, and similar to open surgeries. Differences in inflation-adjusted total ($4971), direct ($2760), and overhead ($2212) costs were significantly higher for converted compared with minimally invasive completed cases. CONCLUSIONS Conversion from minimally invasive to open sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease results in additional morbidity and healthcare costs. Consideration of modifiable risk factors for conversion may attenuate adverse associated outcomes.
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Chiu HC, Hsieh HM, Wan CL, Tsai HL, Wang JY. Cost-effectiveness of mini-laparotomy in patients with colorectal cancers: A propensity scoring matching approach. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0209970. [PMID: 30625209 PMCID: PMC6326502 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Surgical technique process innovations are expected to generally incur no additional cost but gain better quality. Whether a mini-laparotomy surgery (MLS) in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) is more cost effective than conventional open surgery had not been well examined. The objective of this study was to apply cost-effectiveness approaches to investigate the cost effectiveness of adopting MLS compared with open surgery 1 year following resection in CRC patients. RESEARCH DESIGN A prospective non-randomized cohort study design. SETTING An academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS A total of 224 patients who received elective MLS and 339 who received conventional surgery; after propensity score matching, 212 pairs were included for analysis. INTERVENTION None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Cost measures were hospital-index cost and outpatient and inpatient costs within 1 year after discharge. Effectiveness measures were life-years (LYs) gained and quality-adjusted life-year (QALYs) gained. STATISTICAL METHODS We calculated incremental costs and effectiveness by differences in these values between MLS and conventional surgery using adjusted predicted estimates. RESULTS MLS patients had lower rates of blood transfusions, less complication, and shorter post-surgical lengths of stay and more medical cost savings. One-year overall medical costs for MLS patients were TWD 748,269 (USD 24,942) per QALY gained, significant lower than for the comparison group (p-value = 0.045). CONCLUSION Our findings supported that the less invasive surgical process through MLS not only saved medical costs, but also increased QALYs for surgical treatment in CRC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Herng-Chia Chiu
- Department of Healthcare Administration and Medical Informatics, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Research Education and Epidemiology Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
- Institute of Hospital Management, Tsinghua University, China
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, John Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Hui-Min Hsieh
- Department of Public Health, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Research, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Community Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Lin Wan
- Research Education and Epidemiology Center, Changhua Christian Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Lin Tsai
- Division of General Surgery Medicine, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jaw-Yuan Wang
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Division of Colorectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Center for Biomarkers and Biotech Drugs, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
|
44
|
Batool F, Collins SD, Albright J, Ferraro J, Wu J, Krapohl GL, Campbell DA, Cleary RK. A Regional and National Database Comparison of Colorectal Outcomes. JSLS 2019; 22:JSLS.2018.00031. [PMID: 30410300 PMCID: PMC6203949 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2018.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The traditional open approach is still a common option for colectomy and the most common option chosen for rectal resections for cancer. Randomized trials and large database studies have reported the merits of the minimally invasive approach, while studies comparing laparoscopic and robotic options have reported inconsistent results. Methods: This study was designed to compare open, laparoscopic, and robotic colorectal surgery outcomes in protocol-driven regional and national databases. Logistic and multiple linear regression analyses were used to compare standard 30-day colorectal outcomes in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) and American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) databases. The primary outcome was overall complications. Results: A total of 10,054 MSQC patients (open 37.5%, laparoscopic 48.8%, and robotic 13.6%) and 80,535 ACS-NSQIP patients (open 25.0%, laparoscopic 67.1%, and robotic 7.9%) met inclusion criteria. Overall complications and surgical site infections were significantly favorable for the laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared with the open approach. Anastomotic leaks were significantly fewer for the laparoscopic and robotic approaches compared with the open approach in ACS-NSQIP, while there was no significant difference between robotic and open approaches in MSQC. Laparoscopic complications were significantly less than robotic complications in MSQC but significantly more in ACS-NSQIP. Laparoscopic 30-day mortality was significantly less than for the robotic approach in MSQC, but there was no difference in ACS-NSQIP. Conclusion: Minimally invasive colorectal surgery is associated with fewer complications and has several other outcomes advantages compared with the traditional open approach. Individual complication comparisons vary between databases, and caution should be exercised when interpreting results in context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farwa Batool
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA
| | - Stacey D Collins
- Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michign, USA
| | - Jeremy Albright
- Department of Academic Research, St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jane Ferraro
- Department of Academic Research, St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Juan Wu
- Department of Academic Research, St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Greta L Krapohl
- Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michign, USA
| | - Darrell A Campbell
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA
| | - Robert K Cleary
- Department of Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Ann Arbor, Ypsilanti, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Nikolian VC, Regenbogen SE. Statewide Clinic Registries: The Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2019; 32:16-24. [PMID: 30647542 PMCID: PMC6327739 DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1673350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Regional clinical registries provide a unique opportunity for shared learning and population-based analyses of the quality of surgical care. Through the "Michigan Model" of pay for participation in strategic Value Partnerships, exemplified by the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC), the state's dominant private insurer, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, has sponsored 20 statewide clinical quality improvement collaboratives. MSQC represents a partnership among 73 Michigan hospitals with a robust data infrastructure and flexible platform for the promulgation of best practices in surgical quality improvement. This article will describe the organizational structure of the MSQC, the contributions the registry has made to quality improvement in colorectal surgery, and how future work will align to improve the reliability of improvement-relevant registry data.
Collapse
|
|
46
|
Ma S, Chen Y, Chen Y, Guo T, Yang X, Lu Y, Tian J, Cai H. Short-term outcomes of robotic-assisted right colectomy compared with laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian J Surg 2018; 42:589-598. [PMID: 30503268 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 10/27/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
To assess the clinical efficacy and safety of robotic-assisted right colectomy (RRC) with conventional laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) by performing a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published studies. All published literature for comparative studies reporting preoperative outcomes of RRC and LRC were searched. We searched the databases included Cochrane Library of Clinical Comparative Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese Biomedical Database (CBM) from 1973 to 2018. The censor date was up to January 2018. Operative time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, conversion rates to open surgery, postoperative complications, and related outcomes were evaluated. All calculations and statistical tests were performed using Stata 12.0 software. A total of 7769 patients with colon cancer enrolled in 13 trials were divided into a study group (n = 674) and a control group (n = 7095). Meta-analysis suggested significantly greater length of hospital stay in the LRC group [MD = -0.85; 95% CI: -1.07 to -0.63; P < 0.00001]. Robotic surgery was also associated with a significantly lower complication rate [OR = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.52 to 1.01; P = 0.05]. There were statistically significant differences between the groups in estimated blood loss [MD = -16.89; 95% CI: -24.80 to -8.98; P < 0.00001] and the rate of intraoperative conversion to open surgery [OR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15 to 0.75; P = 0.008)], but these differences were not clinically relevant. The recovery of bowel function in two groups is no significant differences [MD = -0.58, 95% CI: -0.96 to -0.20, P = 0.0008]. However, operation times [MD = 43.61, 95% CI: 39.11 to 48.10, P < 0.00001] were longer for RRC than for LRC. Compared to LRC, RRC was associated with reduced estimated blood loss, reduced postoperative complications, longer operation times. Recovery of bowel function and other perioperative outcomes were equivalent between the two surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shixun Ma
- Gansu Province Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Yan Chen
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Jiangsu, China.
| | | | | | | | - Yufeng Lu
- Gansu Province Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| | | | - Hui Cai
- Gansu Province Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Formisano G, Esposito S, Coratti F, Giuliani G, Salaj A, Bianchi PP. Structured training program in colorectal surgery: the robotic surgeon as a new paradigm. MINERVA CHIR 2018; 74:170-175. [PMID: 30484601 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4733.18.07951-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND One major issue in general surgery is how to provide novice surgeons with a structured training program (STP). The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of a STP in robotic colorectal surgery for young surgeons without prior experience in both open and laparoscopic colorectal surgery, who were autonomous in basic minimally-invasive surgical procedures. Right colectomy with intracorporeal anastomosis has been chosen as a model. METHODS Between May 2015 and December 2017 two junior attending surgeons were trained through a STP. Right colectomy was divided into three main learning modules (colonic mobilization, vascular control, intracorporeal anastomosis) and each one was carried out by the trainees for at least two times under direct supervision of the senior surgeon. After the initial robotic cases completely performed under formal proctoring, they were privileged to perform robotic right colectomy independently without a mentor (20 procedures). Operative time, conversion rate, intra- and postoperative complications, length of stay and pathological outcomes were the variables analyzed to assess the effectiveness of the STP. RESULTS The mean operative time was 200 minutes and no conversion was required. Neither intraoperative nor major postoperative complications were recorded and the mean length of hospital stay was 6 days. Mean nodal yield was 21. CONCLUSIONS A STP in robotic colorectal surgery is feasible and effective. Right colectomy represents a good model as first step of the program in order to develop multiple technical skills. Previous experience in open or laparoscopic colorectal surgery may not be necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giampaolo Formisano
- Department of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy -
| | - Sofia Esposito
- Department of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Francesco Coratti
- Department of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Giuliani
- Department of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Adelona Salaj
- Department of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| | - Paolo P Bianchi
- Department of General and Minimally-Invasive Surgery, Misericordia Hospital, Grosseto, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
48
|
Cleary RK, Kassir A, Johnson CS, Bastawrous AL, Soliman MK, Marx DS, Giordano L, Reidy TJ, Parra-Davila E, Obias VJ, Carmichael JC, Pollock D, Pigazzi A. Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: A multi-center propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes. PLoS One 2018; 13:e0206277. [PMID: 30356298 PMCID: PMC6200279 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The primary objective of this study was to retrospectively compare short-term outcomes of intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic-assisted right colectomies for benign and malignant disease. Recent studies suggest potential short-term outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal anastomosis technique. Methods This is a multicenter retrospective propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal anastomosis techniques for laparoscopic and robotic-assisted right colectomy between January 11, 2010, and July 21, 2016. Results After propensity score-matching, there were a total of 1029 minimal invasive surgery cases for analysis—379 right colectomies (335 robotic-assisted and 44 laparoscopic) done with an intracorporeal anastomosis and 650 right colectomies (253 robotic-assisted and 397 laparoscopic) done with an extracorporeal anastomosis. There were no significant differences in any preoperative patient characteristics between groups. The minimally invasive intracorporeal anastomosis group had significantly longer operative times (p<0.0001), lower conversion to open rate (p = 0.01), shorter hospital length of stay (p = 0.02) and lower complication rate from after discharge to 30-days (p = 0.04) than the extracorporeal anastomosis group. Conclusions This comparison shows several clinical outcomes advantages for the intracorporeal anastomosis technique in minimally invasive right colectomy. These data may guide future refinements in minimally invasive training techniques and help surgeons choose among different minimally invasive options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert K. Cleary
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, St Joseph Mercy Hospital, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Andrew Kassir
- Colon and Rectal Clinic of Scottsdale, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Craig S. Johnson
- Department of Surgery, Oklahoma Surgical Hospital, Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States of America
| | - Amir L. Bastawrous
- Swedish Colon and Rectal Clinic, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Mark K. Soliman
- Colon and Rectal Clinic of Orlando, Orlando, Florida, United States of America
| | - Daryl S. Marx
- Department of Surgery, Monroe Surgical Hospital, Monroe, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Luca Giordano
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Colorectal Surgery, Minimally Invasive and Robotic-assisted Surgery, and Bariatric Surgery, Jefferson Health Northeast Torresdale, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Tobi J. Reidy
- Department of Surgery, St. Francis Hospital and Health Centers, Franciscan Alliance, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America
| | - Eduardo Parra-Davila
- Department of Surgery, Celebration Center for Surgery, Florida Hospital Medical Group, Celebration, Florida, United States of America
| | - Vincent J. Obias
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, George Washington University, Washington, District of Columbia, United States of America
| | - Joseph C. Carmichael
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America
| | - Darren Pollock
- Swedish Colon and Rectal Clinic, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, United States of America
| | - Alessio Pigazzi
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, University of California Irvine, Irvine, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
|
49
|
Pinar I, Fransgaard T, Thygesen LC, Gögenur I. Long-Term Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Surgery in Patients with Colorectal Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2018; 25:3906-3912. [PMID: 30311167 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6862-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic technology has been proven to be a safe alternative to conventional laparoscopy with regards to the peri- and postoperative clinical outcomes. Oncological outcomes have been scarcely examined. The purpose of this study was to examine the disease-free survival in relation to the two surgical approaches: robot-assisted surgery and conventional laparoscopy. In addition, all-cause mortality and recurrence-free survival were investigated. METHODS Between January 2010 and December 2015, patients, undergoing either laparoscopic or robot-assisted elective, curative-intended surgery for colorectal cancer were included. RESULTS A total of 9184 patients underwent surgery in the study period: 5978 patients for colon cancer and 3206 patients for rectal cancer. Among patients with colon cancer, 331 patients (5.5%) underwent robot-assisted surgery, and 449 patients (14.0%) underwent robot-assisted surgery in the rectal cancer group. In the adjusted analyses, the hazard ratio (HR) for disease-free survival, for patients with colon cancer was 0.91 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.18]. For patients with rectal cancer, the adjusted HR was 0.83 (95% CI 0.65-1.06). No difference in all-cause mortality and recurrence-free survival were observed. CONCLUSIONS The study demonstrated comparable rates of disease-free survival, all-cause mortality, and recurrence-free survival when comparing robot-assisted surgery with conventional laparoscopy in patients with colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ismail Pinar
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.
| | - Tina Fransgaard
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark
| | - Lau C Thygesen
- National Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ismail Gögenur
- Department of Surgery, Zealand University Hospital, Køge, Denmark.,Institute for Clinical Medicine, Copenhagen University and Danish Colorectal Cancer Group, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Abstract
Robotic surgery is safe and feasible offering many potential advantages to the colorectal surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - D G Jayne
- St James's University Hospital, Leeds
| |
Collapse
|