Published online Sep 28, 2024. doi: 10.35711/aimi.v5.i1.97356
Revised: August 29, 2024
Accepted: September 10, 2024
Published online: September 28, 2024
Processing time: 120 Days and 17.9 Hours
Imaging methods are frequently used to diagnose gastrointestinal diseases and play a crucial role in verifying clinical diagnoses among all diagnostic algorithms. However, these methods have limitations, challenges, benefits, and advantages. Addressing these limitations requires the application of objective criteria to assess the effectiveness of each diagnostic method. The diagnostic process is dynamic and requires a consistent algorithm, progressing from clinical subjective data, such as patient history (anamnesis), and objective findings to diagnostics ex juvantibus. Caution must be exercised when interpreting diagnostic results, and there is an urgent need for better diagnostic tests. In the absence of such tests, pre
Core Tip: The diagnostic process is a complex journey that every physician undertakes with each patient. Successfully diagnosing gastrointestinal diseases requires mastery of all the methods within the diagnostic algorithm. Modern imaging methods provide physicians with significant diagnostic support. But how should the results of these imaging methods be evaluated? This is done using key criteria such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. Only a comprehensive assessment of various diagnostic methods, taking into account these criteria, will ensure the correct diagnosis of the disease.
