Limited research has been performed to determine if histologic improvement serves as a prognosticator for endoscopic remission, a key therapeutic target for ulcerative colitis (UC). The primary aim of the study was to evaluate if histological activity could predict endoscopic remission in UC patients with Mayo endoscopic subscores (MES) of 0 or 1. In addition, we compared the clinical outcomes between histologic improvement group and active group. This research encompassed 492 individuals with UC with MES of 0 or 1, who underwent histological assessment as per the established protocol of Samsung Medical Center between January 2018 and December 2020. Participants were categorized into two cohorts based on the degree of histological activity: those showing histologic improvement and those with ongoing histologic activity. The endoscopic activity was assessed during follow-up, and the primary outcome was endoscopic remission according to histologic activity. Out of the total participants, endoscopic activity was scrutinized in 435 patients during the colonoscopic follow-up and in 146 during the subsequent one. The histologic improvement group at the index colonoscopy was more likely achieve endoscopic remission than the histologic active group. Clinical relapse was more likely in the histologic active group than in the histologic improvement group.

Ulcerative colitis (UC), characterized by its recurrent nature, imposes a significant disease burden and compromises the quality of life. Emerging evidence suggests that achieving clinical remission is not sufficient for long-term remission. In pursuit of a favorable prognosis, mucosal healing (MH) has been defined as the target of therapies in UC. This paradigm shift has given rise to the formulation of diverse endoscopic and histological scoring systems, providing distinct definitions for MH. Endoscopic remission (ER) has been widely employed in clinical practice, but it is susceptible to subjective factors related to endoscopists. And there's growing evidence that histological remission (HR) might be associated with a lower risk of disease flares, but the incorporation of HR as a routine therapeutic endpoint remains a debate. The integration of advanced technology has further enriched the definition of deep MH. Up to now, a universal standardized definition for deep MH in clinical practice is currently lacking. This review will focus on the definition of deep MH, from different dimensions, and analyze strengths and limitations, respectively. Subsequent multiple large-scale trials are needed to validate the concept of deep MH, offering valuable insights into potential benefits for UC patients.

The clinical impact of histological remission on short- and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not well established. We assessed risk of clinical relapse, hospitalization, and need for surgery in patients achieving histological remission in comparison with active histological disease.

A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, and conference abstracts from inception to November 2022. Our main outcome was the rate of clinical relapse in patients with IBD who reached histological remission vs patients with active histological disease. Secondary outcomes were clinical complications of IBD such as hospitalization and need for surgery. The endpoints were investigated at 2 time points, 6 to 12 months (short term) and >12 months (long term).

Short-term outcome analysis showed that the risk of clinical relapse was significantly higher in ulcerative colitis patients with active histological disease in comparison with patients at histological remission (risk ratio [RR], 2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.69-3.44; P < .01). The risk of hospitalization in ulcerative colitis patients was not significant among the 2 groups (RR, 4.22; 95% CI, 0.91-19.62; P = .07). Long-term outcome analysis demonstrated that the risk of clinical relapse (RR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.55-2.76; P < .01), need for surgery (RR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.53-6.45; P < .01), and hospitalization (RR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.59-4.00; P < .01) was significantly higher in patients with active histological disease.

Histological remission in IBD represents an important therapeutic goal that is not yet routinely pursued in clinical practice. In our study, patients who achieved histological remission have more favorable outcomes than those with active histological disease in ulcerative colitis.

The study aimed to assess the longitudinal impact of endoscopic healing (EH) and histological healing (HH) in a cohort of paediatric patients affected by ulcerative colitis (UC).

This was a retrospective single-centre longitudinal study. 86 children with UC who underwent endoscopic re-assessment while in clinical and biochemical remission were included. Partial EH was defined as a Mayo Endoscopic Subscore (MES) of 1 and complete EH was defined as a MES of 0. HH was defined as the absence of active inflammation in all biopsies. The cumulative incidence of clinical relapse was evaluated during follow-up.

At the second endoscopic re-evaluation, 59 (68.6%) patients achieved EH (MES ≤1). Of these patients, 39 (66%) achieved complete EH. 20 of the 39 patients who achieved complete EH attained complete HH. Patients who achieved partial and complete EH showed higher recurrence-free survival rates compared to those who did not (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively). Amongst patients with complete EH, those who achieved complete HH had lower recurrence rates when compared to patients who still showed microscopic inflammation (p = 0.049).

Achievement of EH and HH is associated with fewer disease relapses, with patients achieving HH showing longer relapse-free survival rates.

Psychological stress has been proved to be a risk factor for exacerbation for ulcerative colitis (UC). However, traditional approaches of quantifying psychological stress using psychological scales are time-consuming and the results may not be comparable among patients with different educational levels and cultural backgrounds. Alternatively, heart rate variability (HRV) is an indicator for psychological stress and not biased by educational and cultural backgrounds.

In this study, we try to explore the relationship between psychological stress and UC by analyzing the effect of ultra-short-term HRV on mucosal and histological remission status of UC.

This is a retrospective case-control study on UC inpatients from 2018 through 2020. Ultra-short-term HRV were calculated using baseline electrocardiography. Patients were divided intocase and control groups according to their Mayo endoscopic scores or histological Geboes scores. Three variables of ultra-short-term HRV (the standard deviation of normal to normal R-R intervals (SDNN), the standard deviation of successive differences between adjacent normal to normal R-R intervals (SDSD), the root mean square of successive differences of normal to normal R-R intervals (RMSSD)) were compared between different groups. And for those variables with significant differences, we built univariate and multivariate logistic regressions to depict the relationship between HRV variables and remission status of UC.

All three HRV variables showed significant differences between the mucosal groups. However, none of them showed significant difference between the histological groups. In further logistic regression analyses, smaller RMSSD can predict severe mucosal healing status (OR = 5.21).

Lower ultra-short-term HRV (i.e. smaller RMSSD) is shown to positively correlate with worse mucosal healing status. However, ultra-short-term HRV cannot predict histological healing status according to our data.

This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the effects of endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission on clinical, quality-of-life (QoL), and economic outcomes in adults with ulcerative colitis (UC) in the real-world setting.

Literature searches of Embase and MEDLINE (6 July 2020) and conference proceedings (2017-2020) were performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Eligible studies included adults with UC with documented endoscopic mucosal healing or histologic remission. Clinical, QoL, and economic outcomes were extracted and narratively synthesized.

Of 1603 studies screened, 25 met eligibility criteria and collectively included 2813 patients (mean age: 34-60 years). The most commonly reported indices were Mayo endoscopic score (MES) for endoscopic mucosal healing (n = 22, 88%) and Geboes score (n = 5, 20%) for histologic outcomes. The most frequently reported clinical outcome was relapse-free survival (n = 15, 60%). Less commonly reported outcomes were avoidance of colectomy (n = 5, 20%), hospitalization (n = 4, 16%), clinical remission (n = 4, 16%), and steroid-free clinical remission (n = 3, 12%). Most studies reported relapse-free survival rates up to 50% over 6-48 months of follow-up in endoscopic mucosal healing cohorts. Studies reporting results by MES demonstrated higher relapse-free survival rates among patients with MES 0 than with MES 1 (32%-100% vs 26%-86%, respectively). Similarly, patients with histologic remission had better relapse-free survival rates over 12-24 months of follow-up compared with those without histologic remission (72%-91% vs 40%-63%, respectively). Rates of clinical remission, steroid-free remission, hospitalization, and colectomy avoidance were also better among patients with endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission. Two studies examining QoL reported endoscopic mucosal healing was associated with improved QoL. No study reported economic outcomes.

This SLR demonstrated consistent evidence of improved clinical outcomes among UC patients with endoscopic mucosal healing and histologic remission.

Background and objectives: Ulcerative colitis is a chronic recurrent intestinal inflammatory disease, and its recurrence is difficult to predict. In this review, we summarized the objective indicators that can be used to evaluate intestinal inflammation, the purpose is to better predict the clinical recurrence of UC, formulate individualized treatment plan during remission of UC, and improve the level of diagnosis and treatment of UC.Methods: Based on the search results in the PUBMED database, we explored the accuracy and value of these methods in predicting the clinical recurrence of UC from the following three aspects: endoscopic and histological scores, serum biomarkers and fecal biomarkers.Results: Colonoscopy with biopsy is the gold standard for assessing intestinal inflammation, but it is invasive, inconvenient and expensive. At present, there is no highly sensitive and specific endoscopic or histological score to predict the clinical recurrence of UC. Compared with serum biomarkers, fecal biomarkers have higher sensitivity and specificity because they are in direct contact with the intestine and are closer to the site of intestinal inflammation. Fecal calprotectin is currently the most studied and meaningful fecal biomarker. Lactoferrin and S100A12, as novel biomarkers, have no better performance than FC in predicting the recurrence of UC.Conclusions: FC is currently the most promising predictive marker, but it lacks an accurate cut-off value. Combining patient symptoms, incorporating multiple indicators to construct a UC recurrence prediction model, and formulating individualized treatment plans for high recurrence risk patients will be the focus of UC remission management.

Advanced endoscopic technologies led to significant progress in the definition of endoscopic remission of ulcerative colitis (UC) and correlate better with histological changes, compared with standard endoscopy. However, while studies have assessed the diagnostic accuracy of endoscope technologies individually, there are currently limited data comparing between technologies. As such, the aim of this systematic review was to pool data from the existing literature and compare the correlations between endoscopy and histologic disease activity scores across endoscope technologies.

We searched PubMed and Embase until February 2021 for eligible studies reporting the correlation between endoscopy and histology activity scores in UC. Studies were grouped by endoscope technology as standard-definition white light (SD-WLE), high-definition white light (HD-WLE) or electronic virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) and comparisons made between these groups.

A total of N = 27 studies were identified, of which N = 12 were included in a meta-analysis of correlations between endoscopic and histological activity scores. Combining these studies identified considerable heterogeneity (I ²: 89-93%) and returned a pooled correlation coefficient (ρ) for the SD-WLE group of 0.74, which did not differ significantly from HD-WLE (ρ: 0.65, p = 0.521) or VCE (ρ: 0.70, p = 0.801). In addition, N = 4 studies reported the accuracy of endoscopic activity scores on WLE and VCE to diagnose histological remission. Pooling these found significantly higher accuracy for VCE, compared with WLE [risk ratio: 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07-1.19, p < 0.001].

Activity scores assessed using endoscopy are strongly correlated with activity on histology regardless of endoscopic technology. VCE seems to be more accurate in predicting histological remission than WLE. However, given the heterogeneity between the included studies, head-to-head trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

The ulcerative colitis colonoscopic index of severity (UCCIS) evaluates the state of the entire colonic mucosa in ulcerative colitis. However, no cut-off values of scores for predicting clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis have been established. This study aimed to determine the cut-off values for predicting clinical relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis.

The endoscopic scores (sum of Mayo endoscopic subscores (S-MES) and UCCIS) of 157 patients with ulcerative colitis experiencing clinical remission and their subsequent clinical course were retrospectively reviewed. The optimal cut-off values for predicting relapse and relapse-free rates were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Forty patients with ulcerative colitis experienced relapse within 24 months. The median UCCIS for these patients at the time of study enrollment was significantly higher than that for patients with clinical remission (P < 0.001). The cut-off value of the UCCIS for predicting relapse was 9.8. The relapse-free rate was significantly lower in patients with UCCIS ≥ 9.8 than in those with UCCIS < 9.8 (log-rank test P < 0.001). For patients who experienced relapse within 5 years, the optimal cut-off values for the UCCIS and S-MES were 10.2 and 1, respectively (P = 0.004).

The data from this study indicate that the USSIC is a more relevant score than the S-MES for predicting the time to relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis in remission.

1: ESGE suggests performing segmental biopsies (at least two from each segment), which should be placed in different specimen containers (ileum, cecum, ascending, transverse, descending, and sigmoid colon, and rectum) in patients with clinical and endoscopic signs of colitis.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 2: ESGE recommends taking two biopsies from the right hemicolon (ascending and transverse colon) and, in a separate container, two biopsies from the left hemicolon (descending and sigmoid colon) when microscopic colitis is suspected.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 3: ESGE recommends pancolonic dye-based chromoendoscopy or virtual chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies of any visible lesions during surveillance endoscopy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence. 4: ESGE suggests that, in high risk patients with a history of colonic neoplasia, tubular-appearing colon, strictures, ongoing therapy-refractory inflammation, or primary sclerosing cholangitis, chromoendoscopy with targeted biopsies can be combined with four-quadrant non-targeted biopsies every 10 cm along the colon. Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 5: ESGE recommends that, if pouch surveillance for dysplasia is performed, visible abnormalities should be biopsied, with at least two biopsies systematically taken from each of the afferent ileal loop, the efferent blind loop, the pouch, and the anorectal cuff.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 6: ESGE recommends that, in patients with known ulcerative colitis and endoscopic signs of inflammation, at least two biopsies be obtained from the worst affected areas for the assessment of activity or the presence of cytomegalovirus; for those with no evident endoscopic signs of inflammation, advanced imaging technologies may be useful in identifying areas for targeted biopsies to assess histologic remission if this would have therapeutic consequences. Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 7: ESGE suggests not biopsying endoscopically visible inflammation or normal-appearing mucosa to assess disease activity in known Crohn's disease.Weak recommendation, low quality of evidence. 8: ESGE recommends that adequately assessed colorectal polyps that are judged to be premalignant should be fully excised rather than biopsied.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 9: ESGE recommends that, where endoscopically feasible, potentially malignant colorectal polyps should be excised en bloc rather than being biopsied. If the endoscopist cannot confidently perform en bloc excision at that time, careful representative images (rather than biopsies) should be taken of the potential focus of cancer, and the patient should be rescheduled or referred to an expert center.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence. 10: ESGE recommends that, in malignant lesions not amenable to endoscopic excision owing to deep invasion, six carefully targeted biopsies should be taken from the potential focus of cancer.Strong recommendation, low quality of evidence.

We aimed to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Ulcerative Colitis (UC) Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) and Mayo Endoscopy Score (MES) and to validate the Robarts Histopathology Index (RHI) and Nancy Index (NI) in pediatric UC. We examined rectosigmoid and pancolonic versions of each instrument.

Single-center cross-sectional study of 60 prospectively enrolled participants. Through central endoscopy review, 4 pediatric gastroenterologists assigned rectosigmoid and pancolonic (mean of 5 colonic segments) UCEIS and MES scores. Two blinded pathologists assigned rectosigmoid and pancolonic RHI and NI scores. We assessed reliability with intraclass correlation coefficients and weighted kappa statistics and explored construct validity with correlations, boxplots, and receiver operator characteristic curves.

The UCEIS and MES displayed almost perfect intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient and weighted kappa ≥0.85), moderate-to-strong correlation with histologic/clinical activity and fecal calprotectin (FC), and very strong correlation with global endoscopic severity (r > 0.9). Rectosigmoid UCEIS and MES scores of 0 were highly specific (≥95%) for endoscopic and histologic remission throughout the colon. Pancolonic endoscopy scores correlated more strongly with histologic activity, clinical activity, and systemic inflammatory markers and better discriminated between degrees of active disease. RHI and NI showed moderate-to-strong correlation (r = 0.5-0.83) with endoscopic/clinical activity and FC.

Our findings support the reliability and construct validity of the UCEIS and MES and the construct validity of the RHI and NI in pediatric UC. Normal rectosigmoid findings predicted pancolonic healing, but, given active disease, pancolonic endoscopic assessment more accurately captured global disease burden.

Patients with colonic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are at an increased risk of developing colorectal cancer (CRC), and are therefore enrolled into a surveillance programme aimed at detecting dysplasia or early cancer. Current surveillance programmes are guided by clinical, endoscopic or histological predictors of colitis-associated CRC (CA-CRC). We have seen great progress in our understanding of these predictors of disease progression, and advances in endoscopic technique and management, along with improved medical care, has been mirrored by the falling incidence of CA-CRC over the last 50 years. However, more could be done to improve our molecular understanding of CA-CRC progression and enable better risk stratification for patients with IBD. This review summarises the known risk factors associated with CA-CRC and explores the molecular landscape that has the potential to complement and optimise the existing IBD surveillance programme.

The Swedish Quality Register for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (SWIBREG) contains clinical data for the study of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The Epidemiology Strengthened by histoPathology Reports in Sweden (ESPRESSO) cohort was recently established for the study of gastrointestinal histopathology. We aimed to develop and validate a histology score from ESPRESSO using clinical information from SWIBREG, and secondarily, to evaluate the association of the score on IBD-related hospitalization.

In a nationwide, population-based cohort study of patients with IBD during 1969-2017, we linked endoscopic inflammation in SWIBREG with histologic inflammation in ESPRESSO. We established a clinically interpretable model for predicting the endoscopic score from histology using scalable Bayesian rule lists to define a SNOMED-based histology score applicable to the ESPRESSO cohort. We also assessed the impact of baseline endoscopic and histology scores on time to IBD-related hospitalization.

We identified 5225 individuals with IBD comprising 11,051 endoscopic assessments in SWIBREG linked to a histopathology record in ESPRESSO. We created predictive models to calculate a SNOMED-based histology score which predicted the endoscopic score. Split-sample validated areas under the ROC curves for the score predicting a non-zero endoscopic score were 0.80 (0.78-0.81) in UC, 0.70 (0.68-0.72) in CD, and 0.76 (0.73-0.78) in IBD-U. In a subset of 2741 individuals with an initial IBD diagnosis and a corresponding record in ESPRESSO with an endoscopic assessment in SWIBREG, the baseline endoscopic and histology scores were associated with time to IBD-related hospitalization (endoscopy log-rank UC p<0.001, CD p=0.020, IBD-U p<0.001; histology log-rank UC p=0.018, CD p=0.960, IBD-U p=0.034).

Histopathology data in ESPRESSO accurately predict endoscopic scores in SWIBREG. Baseline endoscopic and histologic scores were associated with time to IBD-related hospitalization, particularly in UC. The SNOMED-based histology score can be used as a measure of disease activity in future register-based IBD studies.