Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a complex condition influenced by various intestinal factors. Advances in next-generation sequencing, high-throughput omics, and molecular network technologies have significantly accelerated research in this field. The emergence of artificial intelligence (AI) has further enhanced the efficient utilization and interpretation of datasets, enabling the discovery of clinically actionable insights. AI is now extensively applied in gastroenterology, where it aids in endoscopic analyses, including the diagnosis of colorectal cancer, precancerous polyps, gastrointestinal inflammatory lesions, and bleeding. Additionally, AI supports clinicians in patient stratification, predicting disease progression and treatment responses, and adjusting treatment plans in a timely manner. This approach not only reduces healthcare costs but also improves patient health and safety. This review outlines the principles of AI, the current research landscape, and future directions for its applications in IBD, with the goal of advancing targeted treatment strategies.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is being increasingly studied and implemented in gastroenterology. In inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), numerous AI models are being developed to assist with IBD diagnosis, standardization of endoscopic and radiologic disease activity, and predicting outcomes. Further prospective, multicenter studies representing diverse populations and novel applications are needed prior to routine implementation in clinical practice and expected improved outcomes for clinicians and patients.

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs), comprising Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract with still-elusive etiopathogeneses and an increasing prevalence worldwide. Despite the growing availability of more advanced therapies in the last two decades, there are still a number of unmet needs. For example, the achievement of mucosal healing has been widely demonstrated as a prognostic marker for better outcomes and a reduced risk of dysplasia and cancer; however, the accuracy of endoscopy is crucial for both this aim and the precise and reproducible evaluation of endoscopic activity and the detection of dysplasia. Artificial intelligence (AI) has drastically altered the field of GI studies and is being extensively applied to medical imaging. The utilization of deep learning and pattern recognition can help the operator optimize image classification and lesion segmentation, detect early mucosal abnormalities, and eventually reveal and uncover novel biomarkers with biologic and prognostic value. The role of AI in endoscopy-and potentially also in histology and imaging in the context of IBD-is still at its initial stages but shows promising characteristics that could lead to a better understanding of the complexity and heterogeneity of IBDs, with potential improvements in patient care and outcomes. The initial experience with AI in IBDs has shown its potential value in the differentiation of UC and CD when there is no ileal involvement, reducing the significant amount of time it takes to review videos of capsule endoscopy and improving the inter- and intra-observer variability in endoscopy reports and scoring. In addition, these initial experiences revealed the ability to predict the histologic score index and the presence of dysplasia. Thus, the purpose of this review was to summarize recent advances regarding the application of AI in IBD endoscopy as there is, indeed, increasing evidence suggesting that the integration of AI-based clinical tools will play a crucial role in paving the road to precision medicine in IBDs.

Endoscopic scoring indices for ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are subject to inter-endoscopist variability. There is increasing interest in the development of deep learning models to standardize endoscopic assessment of intestinal diseases. Here, we summarize and critically appraise the literature on artificial intelligence-assisted endoscopic characterization of inflammatory bowel disease severity.

A systematic search of Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and IEEE Xplore was performed to identify reports of AI systems used for endoscopic severity classification of IBD. Selected studies were critically appraised for methodological and reporting quality using APPRAISE-AI.

Thirty-one studies published between 2019 and 2024 were included. Of 31 studies, 28 studies examined endoscopic classification of ulcerative colitis and 3 examined Crohn's disease. Researchers sought to accomplish a wide range of classification tasks, including binary and multilevel classification, based on still images or full-length colonoscopy videos. Overall scores for study quality ranged from 41 (moderate quality) to 64 (high quality) out of 100, with 28 out of 31 studies within the moderate quality range. The highest-scoring domains were clinical relevance and reporting quality, while the lowest-scoring domains were robustness of results and reproducibility.

Multiple AI models have demonstrated the potential for clinical translation for ulcerative colitis. Research concerning the endoscopic severity assessment of Crohn's disease is limited and should be further explored. More rigorous external validation of AI models and increased transparency of data and codes are needed to improve the quality of AI studies.

Inflammatory bowel disease is marked by significant clinical heterogeneity, posing challenges for accurate diagnosis and personalized treatment strategies. Conventional approaches, such as endoscopy and histology, often fail to adequately and accurately predict medium- and long-term outcomes, leading to suboptimal patient management. Artificial intelligence is emerging as a transformative force enabling standardized, accurate, and timely disease assessment and outcome prediction, including therapeutic response. Artificial intelligence-driven intestinal barrier healing assessment provides novel insights into deep healing, facilitating the discovery of novel therapeutic targets. In addition, the automated integration of multi-omics data can enhance patient profiling and personalized management strategies. The future of inflammatory bowel disease care lies in the artificial intelligence-enabled "endo-histo-omics" integrative real-time approach, harmoniously fusing endoscopic, histologic, and molecular data. Despite challenges in its adoption, this paradigm shift has the potential to refine risk stratification, improve therapeutic precision, and enable personalized interventions, ultimately advancing the implementation of precision medicine in routine clinical practice.

Integrating artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical trials for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has potential to be transformative to the field. This article explores how AI-driven technologies, including machine learning (ML), natural language processing, and predictive analytics, have the potential to enhance important aspects of IBD trials-from patient recruitment and trial design to data analysis and personalized treatment strategies. As AI advances, it has potential to improve long-standing challenges in trial efficiency, accuracy, and personalization with the goal of accelerating the discovery of novel therapies and improve outcomes for people living with IBD. AI can streamline multiple trial phases, from target identification and patient recruitment to data analysis and monitoring. By integrating multi-omics data, electronic health records, and imaging repositories, AI can uncover molecular targets and personalize trial strategies, ultimately expediting drug development. However, the adoption of AI in IBD clinical trials encounters significant challenges. These include technical barriers in data integration, ethical concerns regarding patient privacy, and regulatory issues related to AI validation standards. Additionally, AI models risk producing biased outcomes if training datasets lack diversity, potentially impacting underrepresented populations in clinical trials. Addressing these limitations requires standardized data formats, interdisciplinary collaboration, and robust ethical frameworks to ensure inclusivity and accuracy. Continued partnerships among clinicians, researchers, data scientists, and regulators will be essential to establish transparent, patient-centered AI frameworks. By overcoming these obstacles, AI has the potential to enhance the efficiency, equity, and efficacy of IBD clinical trials, ultimately benefiting patient care.

Artificial intelligence (AI) refers to computer-based methodologies that use data to teach a computer to solve pre-defined tasks; these methods can be applied to identify patterns in large multi-modal data sources. AI applications in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes predicting response to therapy, disease activity scoring of endoscopy, drug discovery, and identifying bowel damage in images. As a complex disease with entangled relationships between genomics, metabolomics, microbiome, and the environment, IBD stands to benefit greatly from methodologies that can handle this complexity. We describe current applications, critical challenges, and propose future directions of AI in IBD.

The Mayo endoscopic subscore [MES] is the most popular endoscopic disease activity measure of ulcerative colitis [UC]. Artificial intelligence [AI]-assisted colonoscopy is expected to reduce diagnostic variability among endoscopists. However, no study has been conducted to ascertain whether AI-based MES assignments can help predict clinical relapse, nor has AI been verified to improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists.

This open-label, prospective cohort study enrolled 110 patients with UC in clinical remission. The AI algorithm was developed using 74 713 images from 898 patients who underwent colonoscopy at three centres. Patients were followed up after colonoscopy for 12 months, and clinical relapse was defined as a partial Mayo score > 2. A multi-video, multi-reader analysis involving 124 videos was conducted to determine whether the AI system reduced the diagnostic variability among six non-specialists.

The clinical relapse rate for patients with AI-based MES = 1 (24.5% [12/49]) was significantly higher [log-rank test, p = 0.01] than that for patients with AI-based MES = 0 (3.2% [1/31]). Relapse occurred during the 12-month follow-up period in 16.2% [13/80] of patients with AI-based MES = 0 or 1 and 50.0% [10/20] of those with AI-based MES = 2 or 3 [log-rank test, p = 0.03]. Using AI resulted in better inter- and intra-observer reproducibility than endoscopists alone.

Colonoscopy using the AI-based MES system can stratify the risk of clinical relapse in patients with UC and improve the diagnostic performance of non-specialists.

The long-term treat-to-target (T2T) approach in ulcerative colitis (UC) aims for endoscopic remission, but variability among endoscopists and a lack of precision in relapse prediction both limit its clinical usefulness. A recently reported white-light imaging (WLI) artificial intelligence (AI) model helps standardize diagnosis, although challenges remain. Therefore, we attempted to combine a narrow-band imaging (NBI) AI model with the WLI AI model to determine whether these challenges can be overcome.

This post hoc analysis of a prospective study evaluated the efficacy of combining AI-assisted WLI and NBI models in predicting clinical relapse in patients with UC over a 12-month follow-up period. A total of 102 patients with UC in clinical remission were included, and the combined AI models were used during colonoscopy to assess relapse risk.

The study found that within the same AI-based Mayo endoscopic subscore category, patients with vascular activity were more likely to experience clinical relapse than those with vascular healing. Compared with the WLI model alone, the specificity of the combined method significantly increased from 42.2% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 32.1%-52.9%) to 61.5% (95% CI: 50.7%-71.2%) (P = .013) with its sensitivity being maintained.

The sequential use of WLI and NBI AI models can provide better stratification of relapse risk compared with using either model alone, offering a more accurate and personalized approach to treatment intensification. This dual-model AI approach aligns with the T2T approach in UC management.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) includes Crohn's Disease (CD) and Ulcerative Colitis (UC). Correct diagnosis requires the identification of precise morphological features such basal plasmacytosis. However, histopathological interpretation can be challenging, and it is subject to high variability.

The IBD-Artificial Intelligence (AI) project aims at the development of an AI-based evaluation system to support the diagnosis of IBD, semi-automatically quantifying basal plasmacytosis.

A deep learning model was trained to detect and quantify plasma cells on a public dataset of 4981 annotated images. The model was then tested on an external validation cohort of 356 intestinal biopsies of CD, UC and healthy controls. AI diagnostic performance was calculated compared to human gold standard.

The system correctly found that CD and UC samples had a greater prevalence of basal plasma cells with mean number of PCs within ROIs of 38.22 (95 % CI: 31.73, 49.04) for CD, 55.16 (46.57, 65.93) for UC, and 17.25 (CI: 12.17, 27.05) for controls. Overall, OR=4.968 (CI: 1.835, 14.638) was found for IBD compared to normal mucosa (CD: +59 %; UC: +129 %). Additionally, as expected, UC samples were found to have more plasma cells in colon than CD cases.

Our model accurately replicated human assessment of basal plasmacytosis, underscoring the value of AI models as a potential aid IBD diagnosis.

The gap between endoscopy and histology is getting closer with the introduction of sophisticated endoscopic technologies. Furthermore, unprecedented advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have enabled objective assessment of endoscopy and digital pathology, providing accurate, consistent, and reproducible evaluations of endoscopic appearance and histologic activity. These advancements result in improved disease management by predicting treatment response and long-term outcomes. AI will also support endoscopy in raising the standard of clinical trial study design by facilitating patient recruitment and improving the validity of endoscopic readings and endoscopy quality, thus overcoming the subjective variability in scoring. Accordingly, AI will be an ideal adjunct tool for enhancing, complementing, and improving our understanding of ulcerative colitis course. This review explores promising AI applications enabled by endoscopy and histology techniques. We further discuss future directions, envisioning a bright future where AI technology extends the frontiers beyond human limits and boundaries.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool across several specialties, namely gastroenterology, where it has the potential to optimize both diagnosis and treatment as well as enhance patient care. Coloproctology, due to its highly prevalent pathologies and tremendous potential to cause significant mortality and morbidity, has drawn a lot of attention regarding AI applications. In fact, its application has yielded impressive outcomes in various domains, colonoscopy being one prominent example, where it aids in the detection of polyps and early signs of colorectal cancer with high accuracy and efficiency. With a less explored path but equivalent promise, AI-powered capsule endoscopy ensures accurate and time-efficient video readings, already detecting a wide spectrum of anomalies. High-resolution anoscopy is an area that has been growing in interest in recent years, with efforts being made to integrate AI. There are other areas, such as functional studies, that are currently in the early stages, but evidence is expected to emerge soon. According to the current state of research, AI is anticipated to empower gastroenterologists in the decision-making process, paving the way for a more precise approach to diagnosing and treating patients. This review aims to provide the state-of-the-art use of AI in coloproctology while also reflecting on future directions and perspectives.

Integrating artificial intelligence into inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has the potential to revolutionise clinical practice and research. Artificial intelligence harnesses advanced algorithms to deliver accurate assessments of IBD endoscopy and histology, offering precise evaluations of disease activity, standardised scoring, and outcome prediction. Furthermore, artificial intelligence offers the potential for a holistic endo-histo-omics approach by interlacing and harmonising endoscopy, histology, and omics data towards precision medicine. The emerging applications of artificial intelligence could pave the way for personalised medicine in IBD, offering patient stratification for the most beneficial therapy with minimal risk. Although artificial intelligence holds promise, challenges remain, including data quality, standardisation, reproducibility, scarcity of randomised controlled trials, clinical implementation, ethical concerns, legal liability, and regulatory issues. The development of standardised guidelines and interdisciplinary collaboration, including policy makers and regulatory agencies, is crucial for addressing these challenges and advancing artificial intelligence in IBD clinical practice and trials.

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a recurring autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent inflammation in the mucosal lining of the lower part of the large intestine. Conventional treatment options such as salicylates, corticosteroids, and immunosuppressants often come with severe side effects, limited bioavailability, and the development of drug resistance, which hampers their therapeutic effectiveness. Therefore, it is imperative to explore natural strategies as safe and alternative treatments for UC. Currently, around 40% of UC patients find relief through natural constituents, which can help reduce toxic side effects and maintain clinical remission. This review aims to provide a summary of both preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of various natural substances in the prophylaxis of UC. These natural options include plant extracts, essential oils, nutraceuticals, and phytochemicals. Furthermore, we will delve into the potential mechanisms that underlie the protective and curative actions of these novel herbal agents. In summary, this review will explore the effectiveness of natural remedies for UC, shedding light on their preclinical and clinical findings and the mechanisms behind their therapeutic actions. These alternatives offer hope for improved treatment outcomes and reduced side effects for individuals suffering from this challenging autoimmune condition.

Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a widespread gastrointestinal disorder characterized by inflammation and ulceration, affecting millions of individuals. Mucosal injury assessment through colonoscopy plays a crucial role in determining disease severity and therapeutic efficacy in IBD. This study draws inspiration from the Segment Anything Model (SAM) framework and tailors it for ulcer segmentation using a Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning (PETL) approach and incorporating binary cross-entropy loss with boundary loss. Comparative assessments against state-of-the-art UNet-based convolutional neural network models underscore SAM's superior performance, especially when faced with limited training samples. Our ulcer segmentation models demonstrate Dice, IoU, and 95%HD scores of 61.92±0.69, 75.18±0.38, and 10.07±0.05 in the colon dataset, and 55.60±0.82, 77.00±0.67, and 7.74±0.23 in the ileum dataset, respectively. This study highlights the potential of our approach to significantly enhance the efficiency and accuracy of IBD diagnosis and assessment through cutting-edge computer vision techniques.

Mucosal healing (MH) in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) is an important landmark for clinical decision making. Artificial intelligence systems (AI) that automatically deliver the grade of endoscopic inflammation may solve moderate interobserver agreement and the need of central reading in clinical trials.

We performed a systematic review of EMBASE and MEDLINE databases up to 01/12/2022 following PRISMA and the Joanna Briggs Institute methodologies to answer the following question: "Can AI replace endoscopists when assessing MH in IBD?". The research was restricted to ulcerative colitis (UC), and a diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) meta-analysis was performed. Risk of bias was evaluated with QUADAS-2 tool.

A total of 21 / 739 records were selected for full text evaluation, and 12 were included in the meta-analysis. Deep learning algorithms based on convolutional neural networks architecture achieved a satisfactory performance in evaluating MH on UC, with sensitivity, specificity, DOR and SROC of respectively 0.91(CI95 %:0.86-0.95);0.89(CI95 %:0.84-0.93);92.42(CI95 %:54.22-157.53) and 0.957 when evaluating fixed images (n = 8) and 0.86(CI95 %:0.75-0.93);0.91(CI95 %:0.87-0.94);70.86(CI95 %:24.63-203.86) and 0.941 when evaluating videos (n = 6). Moderate-high levels of heterogeneity were noted, limiting the quality of the evidence.

AI systems showed high potential in detecting MH in UC with optimal diagnostic performance, although moderate-high heterogeneity of the data was noted. Standardised and shared AI training may reduce heterogeneity between systems.

This systematic review evaluated the current status of AI-assisted colonoscopy to identify histologic remission and predict the clinical outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis. The use of artificial intelligence (AI) has increased substantially across several medical fields, including gastrointestinal endoscopy. Evidence suggests that it may be helpful to predict histologic remission and relapse, which would be beneficial because current histological diagnosis is limited by the inconvenience of obtaining biopsies and the high cost and time-intensiveness of pathological diagnosis. MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for studies published between January 1, 2000, and October 31, 2023. Nine studies fulfilled the selection criteria and were included; five evaluated the prediction of histologic remission, two assessed the prediction of clinical outcomes, and two evaluated both. Seven were prospective observational or cohort studies, while two were retrospective observational studies. No randomized controlled trials were identified. AI-assisted colonoscopy demonstrated sensitivity between 65 %-98 % and specificity values of 80 %-97 % for identifying histologic remission. Furthermore, it was able to predict future relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis. However, several challenges and barriers still exist to its routine clinical application, which should be overcome before the true potential of AI-assisted colonoscopy can be fully realized.

There has been an increase in the development of both machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) prediction models in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. We aim in this systematic review to assess the methodological quality and risk of bias of ML and DL IBD image-based prediction studies.

We searched three databases, PubMed, Scopus and Embase, to identify ML and DL diagnostic or prognostic predictive models using imaging data in IBD, to Dec 31, 2022. We restricted our search to include studies that primarily used conventional imaging data, were undertaken in human participants, and published in English. Two reviewers independently reviewed the abstracts. The methodological quality of the studies was determined, and risk of bias evaluated using the prediction risk of bias assessment tool (PROBAST).

Forty studies were included, thirty-nine developed diagnostic models. Seven studies utilized ML approaches, six were retrospective and none used multicenter data for model development. Thirty-three studies utilized DL approaches, ten were prospective, and twelve multicenter studies. Overall, all studies demonstrated high risk of bias. ML studies were evaluated in 4 domains all rated as high risk of bias: participants (6/7), predictors (1/7), outcome (3/7), and analysis (7/7), and DL studies evaluated in 3 domains: participants (24/33), outcome (10/33), and analysis (18/33). The majority of image-based studies used colonoscopy images.

The risk of bias was high in AI IBD image-based prediction models, owing to insufficient sample size, unreported missingness and lack of an external validation cohort. Models with a high risk of bias are unlikely to be generalizable and suitable for clinical implementation.

Several advanced imaging techniques are now available for endoscopists managing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. These tools, including dye-based and virtual chromoendoscopy, probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and endocytoscopy, are increasingly innovative applications in clinical practice. They allow for a more in-depth and refined evaluation of the mucosal and vascular bowel surface, getting closer to histology. They have demonstrated a remarkable ability in assessing intestinal inflammation, histologic remission, and predicting relapse and favorable long-term outcomes. In addition, the future application of molecular endoscopy to predict biological drug responses has yielded preliminary but encouraging results. Furthermore, these techniques are crucial in detecting and characterizing IBD-related dysplasia, assisting endoscopic mucosal resection and submucosal dissection towards a surgery-sparing approach. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds great potential in this promising landscape, as it can provide an objective and reproducible assessment of inflammation and dysplasia. Moreover, it can improve the prediction of outcomes and aid in subsequent therapeutic decision-making. This review aims to summarize the promising role of state-of-the-art advanced endoscopic techniques and related AI-enabled models for managing IBD, paving the way for precision medicine.

In spite of rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) in digestive endoscopy in lesion detection and characterization, the role of AI in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) endoscopy is not clearly defined. We aimed at systematically reviewing the role of AI in IBD endoscopy and identifying future research areas.

We searched the PubMed and Embase database using keywords ("artificial intelligence" OR "machine learning" OR "computer-aided" OR "convolutional neural network") AND ("inflammatory bowel disease" OR "ulcerative colitis" OR "Crohn's") AND ("endoscopy" or "colonoscopy" or "capsule endoscopy" or "device assisted enteroscopy") between 1975 and September 2023 and identified 62 original articles for detailed review. Review articles, consensus guidelines, case reports/series, editorials, letter to the editor, non-peer-reviewed pre-prints and conference abstracts were excluded. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the MI-CLAIM checklist.

The accuracy of AI models (25 studies) to assess ulcerative colitis (UC) endoscopic activity ranged between 86.54% and 94.5%. AI-assisted capsule endoscopy reading (12 studies) substantially reduced analyzable images and reading time with excellent accuracy (90.5% to 99.9%). AI-assisted analysis of colonoscopic images can help differentiate IBD from non-IBD, UC from non-UC and UC from Crohn's disease (CD) (three studies) with 72.1%, 98.3% and > 90% accuracy, respectively. AI models based on non-invasive clinical and radiologic parameters could predict endoscopic activity (three studies). AI-assisted virtual chromoendoscopy (four studies) could predict histologic remission and long-term outcomes. Computer-assisted detection (CADe) of dysplasia (two studies) is feasible along with AI-based differentiation of high from low-grade IBD neoplasia (79% accuracy). AI is effective in linking electronic medical record data (two studies) with colonoscopic videos to facilitate widespread machine learning.

AI-assisted IBD endoscopy has the potential to impact clinical management by automated detection and characterization of endoscopic lesions. Large, multi-center, prospective studies and commercially available IBD-specific endoscopic AI algorithms are warranted.

Artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted colonoscopy systems with contact microscopy capabilities have been reported previously; however, no studies regarding the clinical use of a commercially available system in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) have been reported. In this study, the diagnostic performance of an AI-assisted ultra-magnifying colonoscopy system for histological healing was compared with that of conventional light non-magnifying endoscopic evaluation in patients with UC.

The data of 52 patients with UC were retrospectively analyzed. The Mayo endoscopic score (MES) was determined by 3 endoscopists. Using the AI system, healing of the same spot assessed via MES was defined as a predicted Geboes score (GS) < 3.1. The GS was then determined using pathology specimens from the same site.

A total of 191 sites were evaluated, including 159 with a GS < 3.1. The MES diagnosis identified 130 sites as MES0. A total of 120 sites were determined to have healed based on AI. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of MES0 for the diagnosis of GS < 3.1 were 79.2%, 90.6%, 97.7%, 46.8%, and 81.2%, respectively. The AI system performed similarly to MES for the diagnosis of GS < 3.1: sensitivity, 74.2%; specificity: 93.8%; PPV: 98.3%; NPV: 42.3%; and accuracy: 77.5%. The AI system also significantly identified a GS of < 3.1 in the setting of MES1 (P = .0169).

The histological diagnostic yield the MES- and AI-assisted diagnoses was comparable. Healing decisions using AI may avoid the need for histological examinations.

Endoscopic remission is an important therapeutic goal in ulcerative colitis (UC). The Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) and Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) are the commonly used endoscopic scoring criteria. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosing endoscopic remission in UC. We also performed a meta-analysis of each of the four endoscopic remission criteria (UCEIS = 0, MES = 0, UCEIS = <1, MES = <1). Eighteen studies involving 13,687 patients were included. The combined sensitivity and specificity of AI for diagnosing endoscopic remission in UC was 87% (95% confidence interval [CI]:81-92%) and 92% (95% CI: 89-94%), respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.96 (95% CI: 0.94-0.97). The results showed that the AI model performed well regardless of which criteria were used to define endoscopic remission of UC.

Endoscopic assessment of ulcerative colitis (UC) can be performed by using the Mayo Endoscopic Score (MES) or the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS). In this meta-analysis, we assessed the pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters of deep machine learning by means of convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithms in predicting UC severity on endoscopic images.

Databases including MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase were searched in June 2022. Outcomes of interest were the pooled accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Standard meta-analysis methods used the random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I2statistics.

Twelve studies were included in the final analysis. The pooled diagnostic parameters of CNN-based machine learning algorithms in endoscopic severity assessment of UC were as follows: accuracy 91.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 88.3-93.8; I2 = 84%), sensitivity 82.8% (95% CI, 78.3-86.5; I2 = 89%), specificity 92.4% (95% CI, 89.4-94.6; I2 = 84%), PPV 86.6% (95% CI, 82.3-90; I2 = 89%), and NPV 88.6% (95% CI, 85.7-91; I2 = 78%). Subgroup analysis revealed significantly better sensitivity and PPV with the UCEIS scoring system compared with the MES (93.6% [95% CI, 87.5-96.8; I2 = 77%] vs 82% [95% CI, 75.6-87; I2 = 89%], P = .003, and 93.6% [95% CI, 88.7-96.4; I2 = 68%] vs 83.6% [95% CI, 76.8-88.8; I2 = 77%], P = .007, respectively).

CNN-based machine learning algorithms demonstrated excellent pooled diagnostic accuracy parameters in the endoscopic severity assessment of UC. Using UCEIS scores in CNN training might offer better results than the MES. Further studies are warranted to establish these findings in real clinical settings.

Endoscopic healing is recognized as a primary treatment goal in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD). However, endoscopic remission may not reflect histological remission, which is crucial to achieving favorable long-term outcomes. The development of new advanced techniques has revolutionized the field of IBD assessment and management. These tools can accurately assess vascular and mucosal features, drawing endoscopy closer to histology. Moreover, they can enhance the detection and characterization of IBD-related dysplasia. Given the persistent challenge of interobserver variability, a more standardized approach to endoscopy is warranted, and the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise for addressing this limitation. Additionally, although molecular endoscopy is still in its infancy, it is a promising tool to forecast response to therapy. This review provides an overview of advanced endoscopic techniques, including dye-based and dye-less chromoendoscopy, and in vivo histological examinations with probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy and endocytoscopy. The remarkable contribution of these tools to IBD management, especially when integrated with AI, is discussed. Specific attention is given to their role in improving disease assessment, detection, and characterization of IBD-associated lesions, and predicting disease-related outcomes.

The aim of this study was to address the issue of differentiating between Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) 0 and MES 1 using a deep learning model. A dataset of 492 ulcerative colitis (UC) patients who demonstrated MES improvement between January 2018 and December 2019 at Samsung Medical Center was utilized. Specifically, two representative images of the colon and rectum were selected from each patient, resulting in a total of 984 images for analysis. The deep learning model utilized in this study consisted of a convolutional neural network (CNN)-based encoder, with two auxiliary classifiers for the colon and rectum, as well as a final MES classifier that combined image features from both inputs. In the internal test, the model achieved an F1-score of 0.92, surpassing the performance of seven novice classifiers by an average margin of 0.11, and outperforming their consensus by 0.02. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to be 0.97 when considering MES 1 as positive, with an area under the precision-recall curve (AUPRC) of 0.98. In the external test using the Hyperkvasir dataset, the model achieved an F1-score of 0.89, AUROC of 0.86, and AUPRC of 0.97. The results demonstrate that the proposed CNN-based model, which integrates image features from both the colon and rectum, exhibits superior performance in accurately discriminating between MES 0 and MES 1 in patients with UC.

The Management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has evolved with the introduction and widespread adoption of biologic agents; however, the advent of artificial intelligence technologies like machine learning and deep learning presents another watershed moment in IBD treatment. Interest in these methods in IBD research has increased over the past 10 years, and they offer a promising path to better clinical outcomes for IBD patients.

Developing new tools to evaluate IBD and inform clinical management is challenging because of the expansive volume of data and requisite manual interpretation of data. Recently, machine and deep learning models have been used to streamline diagnosis and evaluation of IBD by automating review of data from several diagnostic modalities with high accuracy. These methods decrease the amount of time that clinicians spend manually reviewing data to formulate an assessment.

Interest in machine and deep learning is increasing in medicine, and these methods are poised to revolutionize the way that we treat IBD. Here, we highlight the recent advances in using these technologies to evaluate IBD and discuss the ways that they can be leveraged to improve clinical outcomes.

Endoscopic and histological remission (ER, HR) are therapeutic targets in ulcerative colitis (UC). Virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE) improves endoscopic assessment and the prediction of histology; however, interobserver variability limits standardized endoscopic assessment. We aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to distinguish ER/activity, and predict histology and risk of flare from white-light endoscopy (WLE) and VCE videos.

1090 endoscopic videos (67 280 frames) from 283 patients were used to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN). UC endoscopic activity was graded by experts using the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopic Index of Severity (UCEIS) and Paddington International virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre (PICaSSO). The CNN was trained to distinguish ER/activity on endoscopy videos, and retrained to predict HR/activity, defined according to multiple indices, and predict outcome; CNN and human agreement was measured.

The AI system detected ER (UCEIS ≤ 1) in WLE videos with 72 % sensitivity, 87 % specificity, and an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.85; for detection of ER in VCE videos (PICaSSO ≤ 3), the sensitivity was 79 %, specificity 95 %, and the AUROC 0.94. The prediction of HR was similar between WLE and VCE videos (accuracies ranging from 80 % to 85 %). The model's stratification of risk of flare was similar to that of physician-assessed endoscopy scores.

Our system accurately distinguished ER/activity and predicted HR and clinical outcome from colonoscopy videos. This is the first computer model developed to detect inflammation/healing on VCE using the PICaSSO and the first computer tool to provide endoscopic, histologic, and clinical assessment.

Inflammatory bowel diseases, namely ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease, are chronic and relapsing conditions that pose a growing burden on healthcare systems worldwide. Because of their complex and partly unknown etiology and pathogenesis, the management of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease can prove challenging not only from a clinical point of view but also for resource optimization. Artificial intelligence, an umbrella term that encompasses any cognitive function developed by machines for learning or problem solving, and its subsets machine learning and deep learning are becoming ever more essential tools with a plethora of applications in most medical specialties. In this regard gastroenterology is no exception, and due to the importance of endoscopy and imaging numerous clinical studies have been gradually highlighting the relevant role that artificial intelligence has in inflammatory bowel diseases as well. The aim of this review was to summarize the most recent evidence on the use of artificial intelligence in inflammatory bowel diseases in various contexts such as diagnosis, follow-up, treatment, prognosis, cancer surveillance, data collection, and analysis. Moreover, insights into the potential further developments in this field and their effects on future clinical practice were discussed.

Accurate disease characterization is the pillar of modern treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and endoscopy is the mainstay of disease assessment and colorectal cancer surveillance. Recent technological progress has enhanced and expanded the use of endoscopy in IBD. In particular, numerous artificial intelligence (AI)-powered systems have shown to support human endoscopists' evaluations, improving accuracy and consistency while saving time. Moreover, advanced optical technologies such as endocytoscopy (EC), allowing high magnification in vivo, can bridge endoscopy with histology. Furthermore, molecular imaging, through probe based confocal laser endomicroscopy allows the real-time detection of specific biomarkers on gastrointestinal surface, and could be used to predict therapeutic response, paving the way to precision medicine. In parallel, as the applications of AI spread, computers are positioned to resolve some of the limitations of human histopathology evaluation, such as interobserver variability and inconsistencies in assessment. The aim of this review is to summarize the most promising advances in endoscopic and histologic assessment of IBD.

Diagnosis of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) involves combining clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, histologic, and radiographic data. Artificial intelligence (AI) is rapidly being developed in various fields of medicine, including IBD. Because a key part in the diagnosis of IBD involves evaluating imaging data, AI is expected to play an important role in this aspect in the coming decades. We conducted a systematic literature review to highlight the current advancement of AI in diagnosing IBD from imaging data.

We performed an electronic PubMed search of the MEDLINE database for studies up to January 2022 involving IBD and AI. Studies using imaging data as input were included, and nonimaging data were excluded.

A total of 27 studies are reviewed, including 18 studies involving endoscopic images and nine studies involving other imaging data.

We highlight in this review the recent advancement of AI in diagnosing IBD from imaging data by summarizing the relevant studies, and discuss the future role of AI in clinical practice.

Histological remission is evolving as an important treatment target in UC. We aimed to develop a simple histological index, aligned to endoscopy, correlated with clinical outcomes, and suited to apply to an artificial intelligence (AI) system to evaluate inflammatory activity.

Using a set of 614 biopsies from 307 patients with UC enrolled into a prospective multicentre study, we developed the Paddington International virtual ChromoendoScopy ScOre (PICaSSO) Histologic Remission Index (PHRI). Agreement with multiple other histological indices and validation for inter-reader reproducibility were assessed. Finally, to implement PHRI into a computer-aided diagnosis system, we trained and tested a novel deep learning strategy based on a CNN architecture to detect neutrophils, calculate PHRI and identify active from quiescent UC using a subset of 138 biopsies.

PHRI is strongly correlated with endoscopic scores (Mayo Endoscopic Score and UC Endoscopic Index of Severity and PICaSSO) and with clinical outcomes (hospitalisation, colectomy and initiation or changes in medical therapy due to UC flare-up). A PHRI score of 1 could accurately stratify patients' risk of adverse outcomes (hospitalisation, colectomy and treatment optimisation due to flare-up) within 12 months. Our inter-reader agreement was high (intraclass correlation 0.84). Our preliminary AI algorithm differentiated active from quiescent UC with 78% sensitivity, 91.7% specificity and 86% accuracy.

PHRI is a simple histological index in UC, and it exhibits the highest correlation with endoscopic activity and clinical outcomes. A PHRI-based AI system was accurate in predicting histological remission.