Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2021.
World J Meta-Anal. Aug 28, 2021; 9(4): 327-332
Published online Aug 28, 2021. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v9.i4.327
Table 1 Clinical response criteria regarding findings in rectal exam, endoscopy and magnetic resonance imaging described in OPRA trial[20]

Clinical complete response
Almost complete response
Incomplete response
EndoscopyPlain, white scarIrregular mucosal layerVisible tumor
TelangiectasiaMinimal nodules or rugosity in the mucosal layer
Absence of ulceration
Superficial ulceration
Absence of nodules
Light and persistent scar erythema
Digital rectal examNormalSmooth induration or light mucosal layer alterationsPalpable nodules
MRI T2WDark signal in T2 without intermedial signal and no visible adenopathiesDark signal in T2 with an intermedial signalMore intermediate-dark signal in T2
And/orNo scar in T2
Partial regression of the adenopathiesAnd/or
No adenopathies regression
MRI DWNo visible tumor with B800-B1000 signalSignificant regression of the signal in B800-B1000Insignificant signal regression in B800-B1000
And/or
And/or
Clear low signal in ADC map
Minimal/ residual signal in ADC map
And/or
Absent/low signal in ADC map
A linear uniform signal in the tumor wall is a non-pathological sign
Table 2 Recommendations for follow-up for patients under a watch and wait strategy regarding OPRA trial[20]
Follow-up in mo
3-6
9-12
15-18
21-24
30
36
42
48
54
60
PE
Endoscopy
MRI
CT CAP
TM