Barton C, Noshchenko A, Patel VV, Cain CMJ, Kleck C, Burger EL. Different types of mechanical complications after surgical correction of adult spine deformity with osteotomy. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(6): 132-149 [DOI: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.132]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Andriy Noshchenko, PhD, Department of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, 13001 E 17, Building 500, Mail Stop 432, Aurora, CO 80045, United States. andriy.noshchenko@ucdenver.edu
Research Domain of This Article
Medicine, Research & Experimental
Article-Type of This Article
Retrospective Study
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2017; 5(6): 132-149 Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.132
Table 1 Main demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied case series (patients who underwent surgical correction of adult spine deformity with osteotomy, n = 94)
Demographic characteristic
Subgroup (if applicable)
Measure units
Statistical characteristics
Value
Age
NA
Years
n
94
Median
59.5
Mean
58.6
SD
12.7
Min
23
Max
82
Gender
Male
Subjects
Number (%)
30 (32)
Female
Number (%)
64 (68)
Body mass index
NA
Conventional units
Number
79
Median
26.6
Mean
27.2
SD
5.6
Min
16.2
Max
43.5
Primary diagnosis
Degenerative scoliosis
Subjects
Number (%)
9 (9.6)
Idiopathic scoliosis
Number (%)
29 (31.1)
Degenerative kyphosis
Number (%)
13 (13.9)
Mixed and other adult spine deformities
Number (%)
43 (45.4)
Smoking status
Never
Subjects
Number (%)
38 (40.4)
Former
Number (%)
37 (39.4)
Current
Number (%)
14 (14.9)
Not specified
Number (%)
5 (5.3)
Ethnicity
Caucasians
Subjects
Number (%)
82 (87.2)
Hispanic
Number (%)
7 (7.4)
Not specified
Number (%)
5 (5.3)
Osteoporotic status
Osteoporosis or osteopenia
Subjects
Number (%)
29 (30.3)
Table 2 Main characteristics of the index operation (surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with posterior instrumentation and osteotomy, n = 94)
Characteristics of operation
Subgroup (if applicable)
Measure units
Statistical characteristic
Value
Index operation
Primary
Subjects
Number (%)
20 (21)
Reoperation
Number (%)
74 (79)
Number of fused levels
NA
Number
Median
8
Min; max
2; 17
Type of osteotomy
PSO
Subjects
Number (%)
51 (54)
SPO
Number (%)
43 (46)
Osteotomy location
Lumbar
Subjects
Number (%)
58 (62)
Thoracic
Number (%)
20 (21)
Thoracolumbar junction
Number (%)
13 (14)
Sacrum
Number (%)
3 (3)
Inter-level junctions crossing by instrumentation
Cervicothoracic
Subjects
Number (%)
2 (2)
Thoracolumbar
Number (%)
24 (26)
Lumbosacral
Number (%)
13 (14)
Thoracolumbar and lumbosacral
Number (%)
48 (51)
No
Number (%)
7 (7)
Fixation to sacrum (not pelvis)
NA
Subjects
Number (%)
38 (40)
Fixation to sacrum and/or pelvis
NA
Subjects
Number (%)
59 (63)
Use of anterior fusion
NA
Subjects
Number (%)
36 (38)
Number of anterior levels fused
NA
Subjects
Median
2
Min; max
1; 6
Supplemental anterior support/fixation by implant or instrumentation
NA
Subjects
Number (%)
62 (66)
Use of cement
NA
Subjects
Number (%)
23 (25)
Use of bone morphogenetic protein
NA
Subjects
Number (%)
49 (52)
Use of individually precontoured posterior rods
Precontoured
Subjects
Number (%)
32 (34)
In situ contouring
Subjects
Number (%)
62 (66)
Connecting to previously implanted instrumentation
NA
Subjects
Number (%)
16 (17)
Use of Domino and/or parallel connectors
2
Subjects
Number (%)
2 (2)
1
Number (%)
11 (12)
0
Number (%)
81 (86)
Table 3 Characteristics of sagittal spinopelvic alignment before and after index operation, and level of perioperative change
Table 5 Association of different types of mechanical complications with postoperative revision/reoperation after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy (n1 = 94)
Mechanical complication
n1
Association with revision/reoperation after index operation
n2
OR (95%Cl)
P value
Total (failure of spine and/or instrumentation)
41
32
20.0 (6.9; 57.4)
< 0.0001
Failure of spine (total)
24
21
18.8 (5.0; 70.3)
< 0.0001
Vertebral fracture (total)
19
17
19.2 (4.1; 90.1)
< 0.0001
PJF
11
11
> 19.0
< 0.0001
DSF
6
5
7.6 (0.8; 67.6)
0.033
Instrumentation failure (total)
24
18
6.6 (2.3; 18.8)
0.001
Screw loose
17
12
4.2 (1.3;13.2)
0.014
Screw fracture
2
2
NA
0.161
Rod fracture
7
4
1.9 (0.4; 8.9)
0.453
Iliac bolt connector (loose and/or fracture)
4
3
5.7 (0.6; 53.4)
0.308
Disconnection of instrumentation
7
6
9.4 (1.1; 81.1)
0.022
Table 6 Risk factors for mechanical complications (all types: Failure of spine and/or instrumentation) after surgical correction of adult spine deformity with osteotomy
Risk factor(s)
OR (95%Cl: min; max)
P value
Predictive values
Sn
Sp
+PV
-PV
Preoperative SVA > 110 mm
4.5 (1.3; 15.4)
0.011
0.27
0.92
0.73
0.62
Postoperative SVA > 75 mm
5.4 (1.4; 21.1)
0.014
0.24
0.94
0.77
0.62
Preoperative LL< 20°
5.5 (1.8; 16.9)
0.002
0.37
0.91
0.75
0.65
Postoperative change of LL > 34° (absolute values)
4.7 (1.2; 18.0)
0.028
0.22
0.94
0.75
0.61
Postoperative change of PI-LL > 34° (absolute values)
6.4 (1.2; 33.2)
0.033
0.29
0.94
0.80
0.62
Type of osteotomy SPO vs PSO
0.42 (0.18; 1.0)
0.045
0.34
0.45
0.33
0.47
Fall after operation before mechanical complication
6.1 (1.6; 23.7)
0.007
0.27
0.94
0.79
0.63
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic if number of fused levels > 4
2.4 (0.9; 6.4)
0.068
0.74
0.46
0.53
0.68
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic if number of fused levels > 4 with PSO
3.6 (0.92; 13.9)
0.053
0.78
0.50
0.67
0.64
Postoperative pseudarthrosis
14.6 (1.8; 120.9)
0.002
0.22
0.98
0.90
0.62
Integral index based on parameters presented above by results of multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
31.7 (6.7; 149.3)
< 0.001
0.79
0.89
0.86
0.83
Table 7 Risk factors for mechanical complications of spine (all types: Vertebral fracture, proximal junctional failure, and distal segment degeneration/failure) after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Risk factor(s)
OR (95%Cl: min; max)
P value
Predictive values
Sn
Sp
+PV
-PV
Postoperative SVA > 106 mm
11.3 (1.1; 118.1)
0.043
0.20
0.98
0.75
0.79
Type of osteotomy: SPO vs PSO
0.39 (0.1;1.1)
0.046
0.29
0.49
0.16
0.67
Fall after operation before mechanical complication
5.3 (1.6; 17.5)
0.006
0.33
0.91
0.57
0.80
Postoperative change of TK > 25° (absolute values)
4.8 (1.1; 20.8)
0.041
0.31
0.91
0.56
0.79
Postoperative change of PT > 8° (absolute values)
3.3 (0.9; 11.1)
0.045
0.69
0.60
0.38
0.84
Postoperative change of PI-LL > 34° (absolute values)
3.8 (0.9; 15.6)
0.065
0.31
0.89
0.50
0.79
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
14 (2.7; 73.6)
< 0.001
0.85
0.72
0.50
0.93
Table 8 Risk factors for different mechanical complications of spine after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Mechanical complication of spine
Risk factors
OR (95%Cl: min; max)
P value
Predictive values
Sn
Sp
+PV
-PV
Vertebral fracture
Current smoking
5.7 (1.7; 19.1)
0.008
0.37
0.91
0.50
0.85
Type of osteotomy: SPO vs PSO
0.25 (0.1; 0.8)
0.020
0.21
0.48
0.09
0.71
Fall after operation before mechanical complication
4.3 (1.3; 14.5)
0.024
0.32
0.89
0.43
0.84
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
11.7 (2.2;61.5)
< 0.001
0.83
0.70
0.45
0.93
Proximal junctional failure
Current smoking
4.2 (1.0; 016.8)
0.055
0.36
0.88
0.29
0.91
Osteoporosis/osteopenia
3.19 (0.9; 11.3)
0.075
0.55
0.72
0.21
0.92
PSO and > 5 levels fused in osteoporosis/osteopenia
10.4 (0.8; 137.8)
0.039
1.00
0.84
0.29
1.00
Fall after operation before mechanical complication
4.2 (1.0; 16.8)
0.055
0.36
0.88
0.29
0.91
Reoperation vs primary operation
20.1 (2.5; 163.6)
< 0.001
0.92
0.65
0.28
0.98
Type of osteotomy: SPO vs PSO
0.23 (0.05; 1.1)
0.048
0.18
0.51
0.05
0.82
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
4.6 (0.4; 47.3)
0.167
0.75
0.60
0.14
0.97
Distal segmental degeneration/ failure
Preoperative LL ≤ 20°
20.9 (2.3; 190.6)
0.002
0.83
0.81
0.23
0.99
Thoracolumbar crossing junction
18.6 (2.0; 164.9)
0.004
0.83
0.78
0.21
0.99
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic
0.08 (0.01; 0.73)
0.001
0.14
0.33
0.02
0.83
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
2.9 (0.1; 89.1)
0.186
0.67
0.59
0.05
0.98
Table 9 Risk factors for instrumentation failure (all types) after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Factors
OR (95%Cl: min; max)
P value
Predictive values
Sn
Sp
+PV
-PV
Preoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm
4.1 (1.5; 11.3)
0.007
0.46
0.83
0.48
0.82
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)
4.4 (1.1; 18.0)
0.041
0.32
0.90
0.60
0.75
Postoperative SVA < 50 mm, if preoperative SVA≥ 110 mm
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
7.8 (2.0; 29.9)
0.002
0.75
0.72
0.55
0.87
Table 10 Risk factors for screw loosening and rod fracture after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Instrumentation failure
Risk factors
OR (95%Cl: min; max)
P value
Predictive values
Sn
Sp
+PV
-PV
Screw loosening
Preoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm
5.1 (1.6; 15.4)
0.005
0.53
0.82
0.39
0.89
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)
5.4 (1.3; 22.9)
0.026
0.38
0.90
0.50
0.84
Postoperative SVA < 50 mm, if preoperative SVA ≥ 110 mm
20.6 (2.6; 163.8)
0.004
0.67
0.91
0.57
0.94
Preoperative LL < 34°
3.4 (1.0; 10.9)
0.034
0.69
0.61
0.31
0.88
Fixation to sacrum and/or pelvic
2.5 (0.8; 8.3)
0.103
0.78
0.42
0.24
0.89
Postoperative pseudarthrosis
9.9 (2.4; 40.0)
0.001
0.35
0.95
0.60
0.87
Rod fracture
15.6 (2.7; 89.8)
0.001
0.29
0.97
0.71
0.86
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
29.0 (3.3;251.9)
< 0.001
0.92
0.73
0.50
0.97
Rod fracture
Preoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm
9.6 (1.7; 53.5)
0.008
0.71
0.79
0.22
0.97
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)
11.3 (2.0; 63.3)
0.007
0.57
0.89
0.40
0.94
Postoperative SVA < 50 mm, if preoperative SVA ≥ 110 mm
33.0 (2.6; 424.1)
0.002
0.50
0.97
0.75
0.92
Preoperative LL < 20°
4.9 (1.0; 24.3)
0.050
0.57
0.79
0.21
0.95
Postoperative change of LL ≥ 30°
7.4 (1.3; 41.5)
0.022
0.71
0.75
0.23
0.96
Postoperative pseudarthrosis
8.6 (1.6; 46.2)
0.019
0.43
0.92
0.30
0.95
Domino and/or parallel connectors
5.8 (1.1; 29.6)
0.052
0.43
0.89
0.23
0.95
Sagittal rod contouring angle > 56°
9.8 (1.1; 85.2)
0.019
0.86
0.62
0.15
0.98
Number of crossing junctions > 1
5.6 (0.7; 48.5)
0.087
0.86
0.48
0.12
0.98
Connecting to previously implanted instrumentation
8.3 (1.7; 41.9)
0.014
0.57
0.86
0.25
0.96
Iliac bolt connector loose and/or fracture
17 (1.9;147.0)
0.026
0.67
0.89
0.50
0.94
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
6.9 (0.7; 66.5)
0.027
0.80
0.63
0.18
0.97
Table 11 Risk factors for iliac bolt connector loosening/fracture and disassociation of instrumentation after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Instrumentation failure
Risk factors
OR (95%Cl: min; max)
P value
Predictive values
Sn
Sp
+PV
-PV
Iliac bolt connector loosening/fracture
Preoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm
24.0 (1.6; 356.0)
0.021
0.75
0.89
0.60
0.94
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)
7.4 (0.7;81.4)
0.029
0.80
0.65
0.40
0.92
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
4.69 (0.4; 47.3)
0.069
0.75
0.60
0.14
0.97
Disassociation of instrumentation
Type of osteotomy, SPO vs PSO
0.15 (0.02; 1.3)
0.050
0.13
0.51
0.02
0.86
Lumbar osteotomy
7.4 (0.7; 81.4)
0.029
0.80
0.65
0.40
0.92
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic
4.8 (0.6; 40.8)
0.039
0.88
0.41
0.12
0.97
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.46
4.5 (0.4; 47.4)
0.069
0.75
0.60
0.14
0.97
Citation: Barton C, Noshchenko A, Patel VV, Cain CMJ, Kleck C, Burger EL. Different types of mechanical complications after surgical correction of adult spine deformity with osteotomy. World J Meta-Anal 2017; 5(6): 132-149