Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 18, 2025; 13(4): 115195
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i4.115195
Published online Dec 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i4.115195
Figure 1 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses flowchart outlining the literature screening process, study selection, and exclusion criteria.
Figure 2 Forest plots for clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulsed field ablation vs cryoballoon ablation.
A: Procedure time; B: Fluoroscopy time; C: Freedom from arrythmia; D: Phrenic nerve palsy; E: Cardiac tamponade; F: Repeat ablation; G: Vascular complication. CBA: Cryoballoon ablation; PFA: Pulsed field ablation.
Figure 3 Forest plot of Hartung-Knapp adjusted results with subgroup analysis.
AF: Atrial fibrillation.
- Citation: Khawar MMH, Odilov S, Memon U, Sun H, Samee S, Dhakal P, Mishra A, Khan S, Tarar MF, Iqbal M, Hussain A. Pulsed field vs cryoballoon ablation: A meta-analysis with Hartung–Knapp, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses. World J Meta-Anal 2025; 13(4): 115195
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v13/i4/115195.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i4.115195
