Copyright
©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Meta-Anal. Sep 18, 2023; 11(6): 277-289
Published online Sep 18, 2023. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v11.i6.277
Published online Sep 18, 2023. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v11.i6.277
Figure 1 Flow diagram showing study selection process.
Figure 2 Risk of bias according to ROB-2.
Figure 3 Risk of bias according to ROBINS-I.
Figure 4 Quality of evidence assessed by Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation.
Figure 5 Forest plot studies reporting.
A: Outcomes infection; B: Outcomes bleeding; C: Pneumonia; D: Outcomes peritonitis; E: Pain.
Figure 6 Forest plot with studies reporting tube related complications.
- Citation: dos Santos ESV, de Oliveira GHP, de Moura DTH, Hirsch BS, Trasolini RP, Bernardo WM, de Moura EGH. Endoscopic vs radiologic gastrostomy for enteral feeding: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2023; 11(6): 277-289
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v11/i6/277.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v11.i6.277