Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is a surgical technique that can be used in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), improving rotational stability and reducing the risk of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) re-rupture. However, as with any surgical procedure, LET carries a risk of complications. Despite numerous articles published in recent decades discussing LET in the context of ACLR, relatively few complications associated with the LET procedure have been documented in the literature. This study aimed to systematically review adverse events associted with the LET procedure when combined with ACLR.

The following key terms were used: (extra-articular OR extraarticular) AND (tenodesis OR plasty OR augmentation OR procedure or reconstruction OR reconstructive OR surgical OR surgery OR technique) AND (ACL OR anterior cruciate ligament), with no limits regarding the year of publication in PubMed, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Central, Web of Science, and Embase databases. English-language clinical human studies with evidence levels I-IV were included.

This analysis evaluated seven articles published between 1999 and 2023. Level IV evidence was identified in the majority of studies (n = 5), level III evidence was found in one (n = 1), and level I evidence was noted in another (n = 1). Nine distinct types of complications were identified with rates rangingfrom 0.6% to 17% across the analysed studies. The modified Lemaire technique had the highest complication rate, reaching 7.5%. Overall, the complication rate across all reviewed LET techniques in this study was 4.2%.

This is the first study to systematically document the occurrence of complications in LET. The most common problems included LET hardware irritation - predominantly after staple fixation, and subsequent removal, haematoma over the LET site, and pain over the LET site. The analysed studies show that combining LET with ACLR appears to be a safe procedure associated with infrequent and mild side effects.

The anatomic location of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee is critical to ALL reconstruction, but there is not a clear consensus about the location of its footprint. Knowledge of the anatomic footprint is necessary to assess intraoperative positioning and postoperative functional outcomes of ALL reconstruction. Furthermore, while racial and sex-related variations in the ACL have been well documented, it remains unknown whether such differences extend to the ALL, as well as whether these differences influence surgical strategies.

We generated three-dimensional (3D) models based on MRI scans to (1) describe the differences in the ALL position between Chinese and White patient groups by establishing its anatomic footprint relative to adjacent anatomic structures, (2) assess the length of the ALL and the correlation between the ALL sagittal plane orientation and the position of its footprints, and (3) simulate the risk of injury to the lateral collateral ligament (LCL) while reconstructing the ALL by the use of drills of various diameters.

In our institution, patients' information was systematically gathered through a prospective database framework. Participants independently provided demographic details via a structured survey questionnaire, which were then recorded by our team of well-trained researchers. The collected data encompassed age, sex (female and male), ethnic background (White and Chinese), height (centimeters), weight (kilograms), and BMI (kg/m2). This study involved 120 volunteers, including 60 Chinese and 60 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched White participants, whose normal knees were scanned with MRI to generate 3D models. ALL femoral and tibial footprints were identified and digitally delineated on MRI images by two board-certified orthopaedic surgeons. Subsequently, the locations of the ALL femoral and tibial footprints were identified in relation to adjacent anatomic structures. The length of the ALL from the femoral footprint to tibial footprint was then measured, together with the angle formed by the ALL in the sagittal plane relative to a line parallel to the anatomic axis of the femur. Through regression analysis, we explored the correlation between the sagittal orientation of the ALL and the position of the footprint. Finally, simulations of ALL femoral tunnel drilling were performed to assess damage to the LCL footprint center caused by the use of drills of varying diameter.

The ALL femoral footprint was adjacent to both the lateral epicondyle and the LCL, positioned anterior and distal to the LCL attachment, while the ALL tibial footprint was located between the Gerdy tubercle and the fibular head. The mean ± SD femoral footprint of the ALL in the Chinese population was more distal and anterior compared with the White population, which was located posterior to the lateral epicondyle (4 ± 2 mm versus 5 ± 2 mm, mean difference 1 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0 to 2]; normalized p value = 0.03) and distal to the lateral epicondyle (8 ± 3 mm versus 6 ± 2 mm, mean difference 2 [95% CI 1 to 2]; normalized p value = 0.005). There were differences between Chinese patients and White patients at ALL tibial footprint locations, where the distance from the fibular head was 21 ± 3 mm versus 22 ± 4 mm (mean difference 1 [95% CI 0 to 2]; normalized p value = 0.02), and the distance from the lateral tibial plateau was 7 ± 1 mm versus 8 ± 2 mm (mean difference 1 [95% CI 0 to 1]; normalized p value = 0.004). The ALL length was longer in White patients than in Chinese patients (33 ± 4 mm versus 29 ± 3 mm, mean difference 4 [95% CI 3 to 5]; normalized p < 0.001). Multiple linear relationships were observed between the ALL sagittal plane angle and the normalized locations of the ALL femoral and tibial footprints (R = 0.32, mostly correlated). In the posterior directions relative to the lateral epicondyle, the femoral footprint location exhibited an effect on the sagittal angle (p = 0.001). With every 4 mm of posterior movement of the ALL femoral footprint relative to the lateral epicondyle, the sagittal plane angle decreases by about 3.2°. Based on the distance between the ALL and LCL, when simulating femoral tunnel drilling using drill diameters > 8 mm in the Chinese group and > 7 mm in the White group, the LCL footprint center would be substantially damaged in more than one-half of the patients.

Minor differences were observed in the ALL footprints between Chinese and White populations, although no sex-related variations were found. These race-specific discrepancies highlight the need for personalized surgical approaches. In tunnel positioning, the ALL femoral footprint in Chinese populations was located more distal and anterior relative to the lateral epicondyle compared with the White populations. Regarding graft length, White individuals exhibited longer ALL dimensions than Chinese individuals, necessitating prioritization of longer grafts. For graft diameter, in the White group, the ALL footprint distance to the LCL footprint was closer compared with the Chinese group, indicating higher risks of LCL injury during ALL reconstruction. Notably, a linear association existed between the ALL sagittal angle and femoral footprint, offering quantitative guidance for intraoperative precision.

For patients with ALL injuries of the knee or revision surgeries where the native footprint cannot be identified, 3D MRI reconstruction technology enables precise 3D reconstruction of the ALL footprint using anatomic landmarks from the healthy side. This provides surgeons with effective preoperative planning guidance, intraoperative navigation support, and postoperative clinical function assessment. The established relationship between ligament sagittal angles and footprint positioning assists in real-time intraoperative evaluation of tunnel placement and postoperative accuracy verification. Additionally, our data revealed that the distance between the ALL footprint and LCL footprint was shorter in the White group compared with the Chinese group. Based on this anatomic variation, it is recommended to set the upper limit of ALL femoral tunnel diameter at 8 mm for the Chinese group and 7 mm for the White group. Further biomechanical studies are required to precisely define the safety threshold for graft diameter, ensuring graft stability while minimizing the risk of iatrogenic LCL injury.

To investigate the influence of the timing of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) on patient-reported outcomes, comparing patients with and without concomitant medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury.

This study included patients who underwent ACLR between September 2015 and October 2020. The inclusion criteria included patients for whom preoperative and postoperative patient-reported outcome measures were available and a follow-up period of at least 2 years. Patients who sustained grade 2 or 3 MCL injuries with ACL tears were compared with patients with no MCL injuries as a control. All patients underwent ACLR with either bone-tendon-bone autograft or bone-tendon-bone allograft. Patient-reported outcomes (International Knee Documentation Committee [IKDC] score, Lysholm score, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) were recorded, and outcomes were analyzed by sex and time from index injury. A stratified linear mixed-effects regression analysis was conducted.

A total of 253 eligible patients with 2-year outcomes were enrolled. Patients with combined ACL-MCL injuries had lower IKDC scores (β = -6.1 vs β = -8.3, P = .003), KOOS Quality of Life values (β = -9.3 vs β = -11, P = .004), and KOOS Sport values (β = -12 vs β = -13, P = .08) if surgery was performed more than 6 weeks after the index injury. Patients with isolated ACL injuries showed lower KOOS Activities of Daily Living values (β = -2.4, P = .045) if surgery was performed at between 3 and 6 months. Among patients with combined ACL-MCL injuries, autograft was found to have worse IKDC scores (β = -11 [95% confidence interval (CI), -18 to -4.2]; P = .002), Lysholm scores (β = -9.2 [95% CI, -15 to -3.1]; P = .004), KOOS Quality of Life values (β = -11 [95% CI, -20 to -1.6]; P = .023), KOOS Pain values (β = -5.1 [95% CI, -10 to -0.03]; P = .049), KOOS Symptoms values (β = -7.6 [95% CI, -10 to -0.03]; P = .02), and KOOS Sport values (β = -21 [95% CI, -32 to -10]; P < .001) than allograft.

Patients undergoing ACLR with grade 2 or 3 MCL injuries have improved patient-reported outcomes if surgery is performed within 6 weeks from the time of injury. In this cohort, allografts resulted in better outcome scores compared with autografts.

Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The recent advances in surgical techniques have resulted in increasing number of knee preservation surgeries including ligament reconstructions/repairs which adds to the financial burden in healthcare. Important hurdles in doing arthroscopic surgery are high cost and lack of sophisticated options like allografts. To overcome these, we have developed some simple yet effective implant-minimizing techniques (IMTs) which help minimize implants use and allografts for ligament reconstruction around knee.

IMTs help us in minimizing the cost burden by reducing the amount of implants used in multiligament surgeries of knee. There are 4 IMTs that bypass implants for graft fixation. They include 1. Confluent tunnel technique for combined ACL, LCL reconstruction, combined PCL, MCL reconstruction, and combined ACL, ALL reconstruction; 2. bone bridge technique for the combined ACL reconstruction and meniscal root repair, combined ACL, and ALL reconstruction, and tibial MCL repair; 3. suture bridge technique for MPFL reconstruction; and 4. cinch knot technique for LCL reconstruction. The cost- effectiveness between two techniques were analyzed.

Our methods proved to be cost effective with a percentage difference in cost of more than 60 percentage when compared to standard methods of fixation. Patients showed good-to-excellent functional outcomes, with no major complications.

IMTs helped us minimize cost by 60 percentage when compared to standard techniques. They also helped us minimize graft usage, preserve bone stock and avoid tunnel convergence particularly useful in smaller Indian knees. These techniques can be followed without special instrumentation.

To compare the subjective measurement indicators between isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and combined ACLR with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries.

The Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Registry of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized controlled trials with a level of evidence I-II published until September 2024 that evaluated subjective and safety outcomes between ACLR+ALLR and isolated ACLR. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was used to evaluate publication bias.

After literature reviews, 5 randomized controlled trials were identified. The follow-up data were obtained for 377 patients; 184 underwent isolated ACLR, and 193 underwent ACLR+ALLR. The patients who achieved pivot shift test grade I or more after surgery were reported in all 5 studies, and it was significantly lower in the ACLR+ALLR group compared with the isolated ACLR group (risk ratio 0.47, 95% confidence interval 0.23-0.96, P = .04, I2 = 20%). Moreover, the degree of anterior tibial translation after surgery was reported in 4 studies, and it was also significantly lower in the ACLR+ALLR group (mean difference: -0.65, 95% confidence interval -1.26 to -0.04, P = .04, I2 = 83%). The operative and follow-up outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.

Through a meta-analysis with level of evidence I-II and minimum 1-year follow-up data with similar outcomes, we proved that the combined ACLR+ALLR approach yielded superior residual laxity and pivot-shift test compared with isolated ACLR.

Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II randomized controlled trials.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is a common knee injury, and with advancements in knee arthroscopy, ACL reconstruction has become common. Techniques like single-double bundle and femoral tunnel drilling via transtibial or anteromedial portal approaches are available. This study evaluates the accuracy of femoral tunnel placement via these approaches in single-bundle ACL reconstruction.

Forty-three ACL reconstructions using hamstring grafts were analyzed. Initially, femoral tunnels were drilled via the anteromedial portal from 09:30 to 10:00 (14:00 to 14:30 for left knees). Tibial tunnels (mean anteroposterior angle: 63.5°, sagittal: 64.2°) were then created with the same diameter, accompanied by radiological documentation. A femoral aiming device was used to place a K-wire at the center of the femoral tunnel, recorded photographically. Tunnel diameters included 7 mm (20 cases), 7.5 mm (11 cases), 8 mm (7 cases), 8.5 mm (3 cases), and 9 mm (1 case). Two observers evaluated all radiological and photographic data, focusing on the deviation of the transtibial K-wire from the femoral tunnel center.

Of 38 evaluated cases, the transtibial K-wire was within the femoral tunnel in 11 cases (28.9%) - 7 cases with 7 mm, 2 cases each with 7.5 mm and 8 mm diameters. In 23 cases (60.5%), the K-wire was at the perimeter or outside the femoral tunnel - 11 cases with 7 mm, 8 with 7.5 mm, 4 with 8 mm, 3 with 8.5 mm, and 1 with 9 mm diameters.

Transtibial aiming for anatomical femoral tunnel positioning is challenging. No significant correlation was found between the transtibial deviation and the tibial tunnel diameter.

Background and Objectives: The present systematic review investigated the efficacy of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament (ALL) as lateral extra-articular procedures (LEAPs) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. ACL reconstruction using LEAP may reduce graft rupture and rotatory laxity and allow a quicker return to sports. The outcomes of interest were patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport, laxity, failure rate, and safety profile. Materials and Methods: The present systematic review followed the 2020 PRISMA guidelines. In December 2024, PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were accessed without constraints. All clinical investigations evaluating LEAP for ACL reconstruction were considered. Only studies that considered LET and ALL as LEAP were considered. Only studies using a hamstring tendon autograft associated with LET or ALL were considered. Results: Data from 27 clinical studies (3423 patients) were retrieved. The mean length of follow-up was 61.8 ± 39.5 months. ACL reconstruction using LEAP led to a statistically significant improvement in the Lysholm score (p < 0.01) and IKDC (p < 0.01). The mean joint laxity, as measured by the arthrometer, was 1.5 ± 1.8 mm. Finally, 72.3% (623 of 668) of patients returned to their pre-injury level of sport at a mean of 6.3 ± 4.4 months. At the last follow-up, the LET group showed greater IKDC (p = 0.04). On the other hand, there was a statistically significant greater rate of patients positive to the Lachman test (p < 0.01), return to sport (p < 0.01), and reoperation (p = 0.01). No significant differences were found in Lysholm scores (p = 0.6), Tegner scores (p = 0.2), arthrometer measurements (p = 0.2), Pivot shift test results (p = 0.1), time to return to sport (p = 0.3), and failure rates (p = 0.7). Conclusions: LEAP for ACL reconstructions seems to be effective and safe. Most patients returned to their pre-injury level of sport after a mean of 6 months. LET-based ACL reconstruction may be associated with greater clinical outcomes and a higher reoperation rate compared to ALL-based reconstruction.

This classic discusses Arthur E. Ellison's (1926-2010) contributions to our understanding of anterolateral rotatory laxity of the knee. Ellison was a distinguished orthopaedic surgeon and one of the founding members of the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM). He served as the team physician for the United States ski team and Williamsburg football team. Ellison's publications focussed on the pathodynamics of knee stability, shedding light on the biomechanical functions of the iliotibial band. This led to the development of his lateral extra-articular procedure designed to control excessive tibial rotation in the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient knee. His work has made a significant contribution to our understanding of knee stability today, and many surgeons still use a modified version of Ellison's original technique to augment ACL reconstruction. This article summarises Ellison's original publications and the first description of his operative technique. The impact of his work is discussed in the context of modern practice. The aim of this study is to add these valuable insights to the current discussion regarding the optimal method for lateral extra-articular tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V - Expert Opinion.

Background and Objectives: Up to 27% of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction cases result in a residual positive pivot shift sign, indicating anteroposterior and rotational instability. This instability can compromise returning to sports and increase the risk of further injuries. The biomechanical role of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) in controlling internal knee rotation is well known. However, there are no clinical trials comparing isolated ACL repairs to those combined with ALL reconstruction. Our objective is to compare the results of these techniques, with a primary focus on assessing knee stability and graft survival, to provide evidence for optimizing surgical approaches, particularly for athletes and physically active individuals. Materials and Methods: An observational study using paired score matching as a method of pseudo-randomization was conducted. Subjects were divided into an ACL group and an ACL+ALL group. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, as well as those related to complications and survival. Results: A total of 236 patients were included, which was reduced to 74 ACL and 37 ACL+ALL after pseudo-randomization, resulting in preoperatively comparable groups. During follow-up, differences in favor of ALL reinforcement were found on the pivot shift test (p = 0.007). No differences were found with regard to the Lachman test (p = 0.201), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) knee score (p = 0.169), the IKDC subjective score (p = 0.095), intensity of pain (p = 0.928), or complications (p = 0.529). Nor were differences found in the limb symmetry index; the single hop test (p = 0.710); the triple hop test (p = 0.653); the crossover hop test (p = 0.682); the 6 meter timed hop test (p = 0.360); the normalized Y-balance test (YBT) (p = 0.459 anterior; p = 0.898 posterolateral; and p = 0.211 posteromedial directions); or the limb symmetry index of the composite YBT (p = 0.488). There were no differences either with respect to return to sports practice (p = 0.723) or survival (p = 0.798). Conclusions: Patients treated by means of the ACL+ALL technique obtained higher rotational stability, as measured by the pivot shift test, than those subjected to an isolated ACL repair. No differences were found with respect to Lachman test, complications, IKDC, pain, or survival.

Historically, anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) ruptures in the paediatric age group were managed conservatively with bracing, casting, activity modification, and physical therapy. However, most of these patients had to reduce their sports activities, and secondary damages to the affected knee were prevalent.

Published scientific literature in Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases.

ACL reconstruction in children with open physes patients is debated. Any damage to the physes around the knee could lead to growth abnormalities and axial deviation of the knee.

Different grafts are available and suitable for ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients; however, which graft performs better remains unclear.

This systematic review compared bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), hamstring tendon (HT), and quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts for ACL reconstruction in skeletally immature patients. The joint laxity, Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), return to sport, and complications were compared.

In skeletally immature patients, HT, BPTB, and QT autografts for ACL reconstruction yielded good outcomes. Comparative studies are strongly required to establish the most suitable autograft.

Our hypothesis is that the peroneus longus (PL) is a great option for ligament reconstruction in the knee, and therefore the objective of the study is to determine if the use of this graft is safe and does not cause secondary damage to the harvested area. A prospective study was conducted between April 2019 and September 2022. Patients who underwent any type of knee ligament reconstruction using the PL or just the anterior half (AHPL) as grafts were followed up. These patients were evaluated according to the Tegner-Lysholm score and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) guidelines for functional evaluation of the knee and the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) and the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) for the functional evaluation of the ankle. Most patients had an increase in the IKDC score, Tegner-Lysholm score, AOFAS and FADI regardless of the graft used in the surgical procedure, with mean values at the 24-month follow-up of, respectively, 99.02± 0.02, 98.69± 0.08, 99.92± 0.07, and 99.92± 0.07 for those with PL grafts and 99.31± 0.54, 98.88± 0.95, 100± 0.00, and 100± 0.00 for those with AHPL grafts. The differences in the scores between the two graft groups during each of the follow-up periods were significant (P = 0.001). The use of the peroneus longus tendon as a graft in knee surgeries was shown to be adequate for achieving good knee functional results.

Understanding the biomechanical impact of injuries and reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is vital for improving surgical treatments that restore normal knee function. The purpose of this study was to develop a technique that enables parametric analysis of the effect of the ACL reconstruction (ACLR) in cadaver knees, by replacing its contributions with that of a specimen-specific virtual ACLR that can be enabled, disabled, or modified. Twelve ACLR reconstructed knees were mounted onto a motion simulator. In situ ACLR graft forces were measured using superposition, and these data were used to design specimen-specific virtual ACLRs that would yield the same ligament force-elongation behaviors. Tests were then repeated using the virtual ACLR in place of the real ACLR and following that in ACL deficient knee by disabling the virtual ACLR. In comparison to the ACL deficient state, the virtual ACLRs were able to restore knee stability to the same extent as real ACLRs. The average differences between the anterior tibial translation (ATT) of the virtual ACLR versus the real ACLR were +1.6 ± 0.9 mm (p = 0.4), +2.1 ± 0.4 mm (p = 0.4), and +1.0 ± 0.9 mm (p = 0.4) during Anterior drawer, Lachman and Pivot-shift tests, respectively, which is small in comparison to the full ATT range of motion (ROM) of these knees. Therefore, we conclude that a virtual ACLR can be used in place of real ACLR during biomechanical testing of cadaveric knees. This capability opens the door for future studies that can leverage parameterization of the ACLR for surgical design optimization.

In the recent decade, there has been substantial progress in the technologies and philosophies associated with diagnosing and treating anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries in China. The therapeutic efficacy of ACL reconstruction in re-establishing the stability of the knee joint has garnered widespread acknowledgment. However, the path toward standardizing diagnostic and treatment protocols remains to be further developed and refined.

In this context, the Chinese Association of Orthopaedic Surgeons (CAOS) and the Chinese Society of Sports Medicine (CSSM) collaboratively developed an expert consensus on diagnosing and treating ACL injury, aiming to enhance medical quality through refining professional standards.

The consensus drafting team invited experts across the Greater China region, including the mainland, Hong Kong, Macau, and Taiwan, to formulate and review the consensus using a modified Delphi method as a standardization approach. As members of the CSSM Lower Limb Study Group and the CAOS Arthroscopy and Sports Medicine Study Group, invited experts concentrated on two pivotal issues: "Graft Selection" and "Clinical Outcome Evaluation" during the second part of the consensus development.

This focused discussion ultimately led to a strong consensus on nine specific consensus terms.

The consensus clearly states that ACL reconstruction has no definitive "gold standard" graft choice. Autografts have advantages in healing capability but are limited in availability and have potential donor site morbidities; allografts reduce surgical trauma but incur additional costs, and there are concerns about slow healing, quality control issues, and a higher failure rate in young athletes; synthetic ligaments allow for early rehabilitation and fast return to sport, but the surgery is technically demanding and incurs additional costs. When choosing a graft, one should comprehensively consider the graft's characteristics, the doctor's technical ability, and the patient's needs. When evaluating clinical outcomes, it is essential to ensure an adequate sample size and follow-up rate, and the research should include patient subjective scoring, joint function and stability, complications, surgical failure, and the return to sport results. Medium and long-term follow-ups should not overlook the assessment of knee osteoarthritis.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury is one of the most common sports-related injuries. Because of its intra-capsular location, it has very little chance of healing following injury. The causes of poor healing of ACL tears are mostly due to poor vascularity, disorganized collagen bundles, insufficient myofibroblast proliferation, etc. The healing potential is also varied in different age groups like any other tissue. Here, we studied the histological changes in ACL remnants that occur after ACL injury in different age groups and with varied times of presentation since injury. It was a prospective observational study comparing the histopathology of ACL remnants in 12 subgroups of cases. Healthy synovial lining, presence of inflammatory cells, neo-vascularization, and myofibroblasts are needed for natural healing of ACL. We found a favorable environment for the healing of ACL in younger patients with an injury period of one to three months. We suggest cases with a partial tear of ACL in a young individual presented within one to three months duration may be encouraged for conservative treatment or ACL repair surgery rather than ACL reconstruction. Our initial study on the histopathology of torn ACL has added insight into the existing literature and further studies are needed to substantiate its further application.

The purpose of this study was to systematically review and meta-analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting the comparative clinical and functional outcomes, postoperative complications, and radiological outcomes of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) performed using the transtibial (TT) approach or anteromedial (AM) technique. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to Cochrane and PRISMA guidelines. RCTs comparing TT and AM techniques were considered only. The quality of the studies was defined using the GRADE system, and the risk of bias was assessed with the RoB 2 tool. The primary endpoint was to systematically review and meta-analyze the clinical outcomes, residual laxity and failure rate of both AM and TT techniques. In the current meta-analysis 13 RCTs involving 989 patients who underwent arthroscopic single-bundle ACLR (486 TT and 503 AM) were included. Patients undergoing AM technique resulted in higher objective-IKDC (p < 0.001) and Lysholm scores (p = 0.002), despite a lower incidence of pathological anterior tibial translation (p < 0.001) and positive pivot-shift test (p < 0.001). No differences were detected in IKDC subjective score (p = 0.26), Tegner activity scale (p = 0.18) and graft failure (p = 0.07). ACL reconstruction through AM portal technique provides better clinical outcomes and lower incidence of residual rotational and anteroposterior laxity in comparison with the TT technique. No statistically significant difference in subjective outcomes and graft failure was reported.

Surgical intervention after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears is typically required because of the limited healing capacity of the ACL. However, mechanical factors and the inflammatory response triggered by the injury and surgery can impact patient outcomes. This review explores key aspects of ACL injury and reconstruction biology, including the inflammatory response, limited spontaneous healing, secondary inflammation after reconstruction, and graft healing processes. Understanding these biologic mechanisms is crucial for developing new treatment strategies and enhancing patient well-being. By shedding light on these aspects, clinicians and researchers can work toward improving quality of life for individuals affected by ACL tears.

A novel hybrid transtibial (HTT) approach to femoral tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been developed that circumvents the need for knee hyperflexion and orients the graft in the most anatomic position without sacrificing the tunnel length or aperture.

Patients who underwent ACLR utilizing the HTT technique would achieve excellent patient-reported outcome scores and experience low rates of graft failure and reoperations.

Case series; Level of evidence, 4.

Patients who underwent primary ACLR at a single institution between 2005 and 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients treated with the HTT, anteromedial portal (AMP), and transtibial (TT) approaches were matched based on age, sex, and body mass index ±3 kg/m2. Demographic and surgical data as well as femoral tunnel angle measurements on anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were collected for the 3 groups. However, clinical outcomes were only reported for the HTT group because of concerns of graft heterogeneity.

A total of 170 patients (median age, 26.5 years [interquartile range (IQR), 18.0-35.0 years]) who underwent ACLR using the HTT approach were included. The median coronal- and sagittal-plane femoral tunnel angles were 47° (IQR, 42°-53°) and 40° (IQR, 34°-46°), respectively. The sagittal-plane femoral tunnel angles in the HTT group were significantly more horizontal compared with those in the TT group (P < .0001), whereas the coronal-plane femoral tunnel angles in the HTT group were found to be significantly more vertical compared with those in the AMP group (P = .001) and more horizontal compared with those in the TT group (P < .0001). The graft failure and reoperation rates in the HTT group at a minimum 2-year follow-up were 1.8% (3/170) and 4.7% (8/170), respectively. The complication rate was 6.5% (11/170), with the most common complication being subjective stiffness in 7 patients. The median Lysholm score was 89.5 (IQR, 79.0-98.0); the median International Knee Documentation Committee score was 83.9 (IQR, 65.5-90.8); and the median Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey physical and mental component summary scores were 55.0 (IQR, 52.6-55.9) and 56.2 (IQR, 49.1-59.3), respectively.

ACLR using the HTT technique was associated with low graft retear and revision surgery rates and good patient-reported outcome scores at medium-term follow-up and demonstrated femoral tunnel obliquity on postoperative radiographs that correlated with optimal parameters previously reported in cadaveric and biomechanical studies.

To use Google trends to explore differences in public interest among types of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) autografts, specifically quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon, and hamstring tendon autografts, between 2008 and 2019.

Data were obtained by querying Google Trends for key terms and phrases for online search data ranging from January 2008 to December 2019. Relative search volumes were created based on searches related to ACL reconstruction with comparative analysis generated for search terms related to quadriceps ACL, patellar tendon ACL, and hamstring ACL autografts. Statistical analysis included linear regression analysis, comparison of quarterly search volume trends over time, and comparison of cumulative annual search volumes for 2008 versus 2019.

Linear models for respective search terms were statistically significant for the quadriceps (P < .001) and patellar (P = .007) tendon autograft groups but not the hamstring group (P = .129). The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a 12-year search volume trend change of 0.56, which was significantly greater than the hamstring (0.07; P < .001) and patellar tendon (0.168; P < .001) groups. There was no significant difference in the trend change between hamstring and patellar tendon groups (P = .20). Percent change in cumulative relative annual search volumes between 2008 and 2019 was 112% for the quadriceps tendon group, 12.9% for the hamstring group, and 18.6% for the patellar tendon group.

This study indicates a consistently increasing public interest in quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction. The quadriceps autograft group demonstrated a significantly greater 12-year online search volume, greater linear correlation, and larger percent change between 2008 and 2019 compared with patellar tendon or hamstring autograft groups.

Awareness of patient perceptions has value in informing shared decision-making, aligning patient expectations, and guiding areas of future research. Each of these has an impact on patient care. Being aware of patient interest and expectations is particularly important in areas with controversial or emerging research.

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has proven successful in wound healing. However, its potential effects on anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries remain uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the impact of HBOT on graft healing following ACL reconstruction in rabbits. Male New Zealand rabbits underwent ACL reconstruction and were randomly divided into two groups: the HBOT group and the ambient air group. The HBOT group received 100% oxygen at 2.5 atmospheres absolute for 2 h daily for 5 consecutive days, starting from the first day after surgery. The ambient air group was maintained in normal room air throughout the entire period. After 12 weeks following the surgery, animals were euthanized, and their knees were harvested for analysis. The HBOT group demonstrated superior graft maturation and integration in comparison to the ambient air group, as evidenced by lower graft signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging, decreased femoral and tibial tunnel size, and higher bone mineral density values on high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography scans. Additionally, biomechanical testing indicated that the HBOT group had greater load to failure and stiffness values than the ambient air group. In conclusion, the adjuvant use of HBOT improved ACL graft maturation and integration, reduced tunnel widening, and enhanced the biomechanical properties of the graft. These results may provide important insights into the potential clinical application of HBOT as a therapeutic intervention to enhance graft healing after ACL reconstruction, paving the way for further research in this area.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) are performed to restore knee biomechanics, increase knee stability, and slow the progression of osteoarthritis. After ACLRs, many patients still have residual anterolateral instability which is a risk factor for ACL graft failure. An anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR) attempts to restore the native function of the anterolateral complex to augment the ACL. Performing an ALLR with an ACLR has been reported to reduce symptoms of instability and improve clinical outcomes.

While no definitive indication for an ALLR has been set, current considerations include high posterior tibial slope >12°, revision ACLR, high-grade pivot shift, skeletally immature patients, hyperlaxity, and patients in high-level sports.

The preoperative assessment includes a thorough physical examination with special attention paid to rotational laxity assessed via the pivot-shift examination. Imaging should include standard radiographic series (anteroposterior, posteroanterior flexion, lateral, and sunrise views), long-leg mechanical axis views to assess coronal plane alignment and standing lateral ACL stress radiographs to assess sagittal alignment and objective instability. The iliotibial band ALLR graft is harvested first. An 8-cm long by 1-cm wide strip of the inferior iliotibial band is harvested in a standard fashion, leaving the distal aspect attached to Gerdy's tubercle. An anchor is placed centered upon the native ALL distal tibial insertion. The native ALL femoral origin is identified at 4.7 mm posterior and proximal to the fibular collateral ligament, and a second suture anchor is placed at this point. Final fixation is performed after the final fixation of the ACLR graft.

A study by Pioger et al reported that patients with ACLR and ALLR had significantly less reoperation rate than patients with isolated ACLR, 8.9% versus 20.5% respectively. Lee et al found that a revision ACLR in combination with an ALLR was effective in reducing rotational laxity, which was assessed by the pivot-shift test.

We describe a technique for a new anatomic ALLR using the iliotibial band that attempts to restore the native ALL anatomy. This surgical technique effectively restores rotational laxity and improves knee stability.

The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Individual factors of low rates of return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction were unclear. We evaluated the impact of various individual factors after ACL reconstruction for return to sport in athletes.

A prospective study was performed in 1274 athletes, who had undergone ACL autograft reconstruction. Individual factors survey about return to sport was performed during the second year after surgery. Athlete responses were analyzed with a multivariate logistic model adjusted for baseline patient characteristics and an adjusted Cox model.

Younger age and involvement in higher-level sporting activities were associated with a significantly higher frequency and a significantly shorter time to return to sport (running, training, competition; p = 0.001 to 0.028). Men returned to sport more rapidly than women, for both training (p = 0.007) and competition (p = 0.042). Although there was no difference to return to sport between hamstring (HT) and patellar tendon (PT) autograft. We note that MacFL surgery (Mac Intosh modified with intra- and extra-articular autografts used the tensor fasciae latae muscle) was associated with a higher frequency (p = 0.03) and rapidity (p = 0.025) of return to training than HT. Sports people practicing no weight-bearing sports returned to training (p < 0.001) and competition (p < 0.001) more rapidly than other sports people. By contrast, the practicing pivoting sports with contact started running again sooner (p < 0.001).

Younger age, male sex, higher level of sports, sportspeople practicing no weight-bearing sports, and MacFL surgery reduce time to return to sport after ACL reconstruction.

Postoperative residual rotatory laxity remains despite improvement in surgical techniques for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR).

To evaluate factors associated with residual pivot shift after ACLR by quantitative measurement of the pivot shift before and after surgery.

Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

A total of 97 patients who underwent primary double-bundle ACLR between June 2016 and March 2021 and underwent surgery to remove staples, with at least 12 months of follow-up evaluation, were enrolled. Quantitative measurements were performed under general anesthesia immediately before ACLR (preoperatively), after temporary fixation of the ACL graft (intraoperatively), and immediately before staple removal (postoperatively). The laxity of pivot shift was assessed using inertial sensors to measure acceleration and external rotational angular velocity (ERAV). Descriptive data were assessed for associations with postoperative acceleration and ERAV in a univariate analysis. A multiple linear regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with postoperative acceleration and ERAV.

Anterior tibial translation, acceleration, and ERAV increased from intra- to postoperatively (P < .05). Factors significantly associated with postoperative acceleration were age (β = -0.238; P = .021), lateral posterior tibial slope (PTS) (β = 0.194; P = .048), and preoperative acceleration (β = 0.261; P = .008). Factors significantly affecting postoperative ERAV were age (β = -0.222; P = .029), ramp lesions (β = 0.212; P = .027), and preoperative ERAV (β = 0.323; P = .001).

Greater preoperative laxity in the pivot shift was the factor having the most significant association with residual pivot shift after ACLR using quantitative measurements under general anesthesia. Younger age, higher lateral PTS, and concomitant ramp lesions were significant predictors of residual pivot shift. These findings can help pre- and intraoperative decision-making regarding whether an anterolateral structure augmentation should be added.

Objective:  Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is one of the most common injuries in athletes and is often associated with damage to anterolateral structures. This combination of injuries presents itself clinically as a high-grade pivot shift test. The hypothesis of this study is that patients with ACL deficiency and high-grade pivot shift test should have an increased internal knee rotation. Methods:  Twenty-two patients were tested. After effective spinal anesthesia, two tests were performed with the patient in supine position. First, the bilateral pivot shift test was performed manually, and its grade was recorded. Then, with the knee flexed to 90 degrees, the examiner drew the projection of the foot in a neutral position and in maximum internal rotation, and the angle of internal rotation was measured from the axes built between the central point of the heel and the hallux. Results:  In the ACL-deficient knee, it was observed that there is a statistically significant average internal rotation (IR) delta of 10.5 degrees between the groups when not adjusted for age, and 10.6 degrees when adjusted for age. Conclusions:  Knees with ACL deficiency and with pivot shift test grade I do not show increased internal rotation in relation to knees with intact ACL. Knees with ACL deficiency and with pivot shift test grades II and III show increased internal rotation in comparison to healthy knees.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of two-stage reconstruction (peripheral reconstruction in phase I and central anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) / posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction in phase II) with remnant preservation for patients with knee dislocation.

A total of 70 patients (10 IIIM, 17 IIIL, and 43 IV) with knee dislocation were randomly divided into the remnant-preserved group and the simple reconstruction group. Patients underwent two-stage reconstruction, including the reconstruction of collateral ligament in phase I and the reconstruction of ACL/PCL in phase II (12 weeks after phase I). Grafts were harvested from the semitendinosus and gracilis tendons from both lower limbs. After the surgery, the joint flexion and extension, bone tunnel and ligament healing, and joint stability were evaluated.

After the surgery, the lateral stability recovered in all patients, and X-ray revealed a good position of bone tunnel. Follow-up was performed at 12 months postoperatively and ranged from 24 to 91 months. At the final follow-up, knee flexion angle, IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores were all higher in both groups compared to the preoperative period. Notably, the remnant-preserved group showed superior results in these parameters compared to the simple reconstruction group. There was statistical significance between the two groups in terms of the Lachman test.

The knee function was well recovered after two-stage ligament reconstruction with remnant preservation.

Patellar femoral chondropathy (FPC) is a common problem in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACL-R) surgery, which, if left untreated, predisposes to arthrosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the non-invasive gold standard for morphological evaluation of cartilage, while in recent years advanced MRI techniques (such as T2 mapping) have been developed to detect early cartilage biochemical changes. This study evaluates the different onset of early PFC between B-TP-B and HT through T2 mapping. Secondly, it aims to assess the presence of any concordance between self-reported questionnaires and qualitative MRI.

19 patients enrolled were divided into two groups based on the type of intervention: B-PT-B and HT. After a median time of 54 months from surgery, patients were subjected to conventional MRI, T2 mapping, and clinical-functional evaluation through three self-reported questionnaires: Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis index (KOOS); Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale; International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC).

There is not statistically significant difference in the comparison between the two MRI techniques and the two reconstructive techniques. KOOS and Tegner Lysholm scales showed significant agreement with MRI results on the grading of chondropathy.

There are no differences between B-TP-B and HT techniques in the early development of PFC detectable through non-invasive methods. Due to the large reduction in the frequency of physical activity following ACL-R and the finding of mild PFC (grade I and II) in a substantial proportion of patients, after a relatively short period from ACL-R, all patients should undergo conservative treatment.

Recently, interest in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) preservation and repair after proximal ACL tears has been resurrected. Although good clinical outcomes have been reported in the literature with adequate patient selection, to date detailed scientific evidence for the functional benefit of primary ACL repair with ligament augmentation is scarce.

To compare patient-reported, clinical, and functional outcomes in patients 2 years after ACL repair and InternalBrace augmentation (ACL-IB) with age- and sex-matched patients 2 years after ACL reconstruction (ACL-R) and with matched healthy controls.

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

In total, 29 patients 2 years after ACL-IB, 27 sex- and age- matched patients 2 years after ACL-R (hamstring autografts), and 29 matched healthy controls were included. Patient-reported outcomes were assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, EQ-5D-5L, Tegner Activity Scale, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sports after Injury scale. Surgery time was recorded. For clinical outcomes, range of motion and thigh and shank circumference were measured, and passive anterior translation was determined using the Rolimeter. Isokinetic muscle strength was measured using a Biodex dynamometer. The limb symmetry index (operated/contralateral or nondominant/dominant × 100), side-to-side differences (operated - contralateral, nondominant - dominant), and hamstring-quadriceps ratios were calculated for functional parameters. Failure and reoperation rates were not compared.

Two years after surgery, patients treated with ACL-IB showed good to excellent patient-reported outcomes comparable with those of patients after ACL-R. Surgery time, including concomitant surgeries, was significantly shorter in the ACL-IB group (mean, 81 minutes) compared with the ACL-R group (mean, 97 minutes) (P = .024). Isokinetic muscle strength was comparable between patient groups without significant differences in extensor and flexor strength or in hamstring-quadriceps ratios.

These results suggest that ACL-IB achieves comparable patient-reported, clinical, and functional outcomes with ACL-R at 2 years postoperatively and, after careful patient selection, should be considered as a valuable early treatment alternative for proximal ACL tears.

NCT04429165 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is often performed with the use of a thigh tourniquet. Surgeons believe this helps improve visualisation and reduce operative time. However, tourniquet use has been associated with many complications including increased pain, neurovascular injury, venous thromboembolism, haematoma formation, and others. In this article, we describe a method allowing comparable arthroscopic visualisation to be achieved without the aid of a tourniquet for ACLR procedures. The literature evidence relating to this technique as well as tourniquet use for ACLR is also reviewed. Tourniquet-less ACLR can be achieved through the combined application of hypotensive anaesthesia, intravenous tranexamic acid, and use of adrenaline-supplemented irrigation fluid and local anaesthetic. Performing ACLR without a tourniquet avoids the risks associated with its use and reduces the severity of post-operative haemarthrosis which may contribute to the patient's pain and limit their ability to perform their rehabilitation exercises.

To systematically review the current literature regarding the indications, techniques, and outcomes after 2-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).

A literature search was performed using SCOPUS, PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials according to the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. Inclusion criteria was limited to Level I-IV human studies reporting on indications, surgical techniques, imaging, and/or clinical outcomes of 2-stage revision ACLR.

Thirteen studies with 355 patients treated with 2-stage revision ACLR were identified. The most commonly reported indications were tunnel malposition and tunnel widening, with knee instability being the most common symptomatic indication. Tunnel diameter threshold for 2-stage reconstruction ranged from 10 to 14 mm. The most common grafts used for primary ACLR were bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, hamstring graft, and LARS (polyethylene terephthalate) synthetic graft. The time elapsed from primary ACLR to the first stage surgery ranged from 1.7 years to 9.7 years, whereas the time elapsed between the first and second stage ranged from 21 weeks to 13.6 months. Six different bone grafting options were reported, with the most common being iliac crest autograft, allograft bone dowels, and allograft bone chips. During definitive reconstruction, hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most commonly used grafts. Studies reporting patient-reported outcome measures showed improvement from preoperative to postoperative levels in Lysholm, Tegner, and objective International Knee and Documentation Committee scores.

Tunnel malpositioning and widening remain the most common indications for 2-stage revision ACLR. Bone grafting is commonly reported using iliac crest autograft and allograft bone chips and dowels, whereas hamstring autograft and BPTB autograft were the most used grafts during the second-stage definitive reconstruction. Studies showed improvements from preoperative to postoperative levels in commonly used patient reported outcomes measures.

Level IV, systematic review of Level I, III, and IV studies.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair (ACL-Rp) is known to be a valuable alternative to ACL reconstruction (ACL-Rc) in selected indications. The majority of the ACL-Rp techniques recommend the use of a synthetic brace. The use of the gracilis allows both a biological internal brace and anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALR).

The primary objective was to compare the early ability to return to sports between patients who underwent ACL-Rp using a gracilis autograft as an internal brace augmentation with ALR and patients who underwent the conventional ACL-Rc with ALR technique sacrificing both the gracilis and the semitendinosus. The secondary objective was to compare the failure rate, clinical scores, and return to sports at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.

A retrospective analysis was undertaken. A total of 49 patients who underwent ACL-Rp with ALR between December 2018 and May 2019 were propensity matched at a 1:1 ratio to those who underwent ACL-Rc with ALR during the same period. The decision to perform ACL-Rp with ALR was based on preoperative selection and intraoperative arthroscopic findings: proximal avulsion tear, partial ACL tear, low- to midlevel sports participation, and good tissue quality. The ability to return to sports was assessed using isokinetic tests and the Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test functional test at 6 months postoperatively. At the final follow-up, knee laxity parameters, return to sports, and clinical outcome (Lysholm score, Tegner Activity Scale score, International Knee Documentation Committee score, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury score) were recorded.

The ACL-Rp group had significantly less hamstring strength deficit when compared with their counterparts who underwent ACL-Rc (0.2% vs 10.2% in concentric, P < .001; 2.5% vs 14% in eccentric, P < .001). The mean Knee Santy Athletic Return to Sport test score was significantly higher in the ACL-Rc group (69.7% ± 16.6% [range, 19%-100%] vs 61% ± 16.8% [range, 19%-100%]; P = .001). In the ACL-Rp group, 61% (30/49) of the patients were authorized to return to pivot sports versus 41% (20/49) in the ACL-Rc group (P = .04). At a mean final follow-up of 31.4 ± 3.5 months, no significant differences were demonstrated between groups with respect to clinical scores and knee laxity parameters. There was a trend for a higher failure rate in the ACL-Rp group without any significance (ACL-Rp: 6.1% [3/49] vs ACL-Rc: 0%; P = .08).

At 6 months after operation, harvesting only the gracilis with this ACL-Rp and augmentation with ALR technique was linked to a better early ability to return to sports compared with the ACL-Rc with ALR technique harvesting both the gracilis and semitendinosus. This technique had a limited effect on early flexion strength and provided a satisfactory rerupture rate.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) techniques have substantially evolved over the past several decades, driven by evidence that nonanatomic techniques increase the risk for instability, loss of motion, surgical failure, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Early techniques used transtibial femoral tunnel drilling, although improved understanding of the anatomy and biomechanics has led to independent femoral tunnel. Anatomic ACLR requires careful consideration of the native ACL dimensions and orientation. Although there is significant variation between patients, understanding of anatomic patterns allows for reliable identification of the ACL footprints and appropriate tunnel positioning, particularly in chronic injuries where the remanent ACL stump is degraded or absent. The femoral tunnel should be placed low and posterior on the lateral femoral condyle using the lateral intercondylar and bifurcate ridges as landmarks. The center of the tibial footprint can be determined by referencing the medial tibial spine and posterior border of anterior horn of lateral meniscus. Measurement of the dimensions of the native ACL and intercondylar notch is also critical for determining graft size and minimizing the risk of impingement, with a goal of reconstructing 50% to 80% of the tibial footprint area. Clinical outcome studies have demonstrated superior anteroposterior and rotatory knee stability with low surgical revision rates (reported between 3% and 5%). By adhering to the principles of anatomic ACLR, surgeons can produce an appropriately sized and located graft for the individual patient, thereby best restoring native knee kinematics and maximizing function. The aim of this infographic is to highlight essential features of anatomic ACLR techniques, which a focus on the native anatomy and surgical planning to achieve an anatomic ACLR.

To evaluate hip and knee muscular function, knee patient-reported outcome measures and hop performance in patients with a clinical indication for combined ACL+ALL reconstruction surgery compared to patients with an isolated ACL reconstruction surgery indication (preoperative phase) and to a control group.

Cross-sectional study.

The sample was composed of male individuals, aged between 18 and 59 years, divided into three groups (ACL, ACL+ALL and Control). Isokinetic dynamometry was performed for the flexor and extensor knee muscles and for the hip abductors and adductors. SLHT, COHT and the Lysholm score were performed. Pain, swelling, and thigh trophism were also measured.

The study participants were 89 male individuals: 63 in the injury group and 26 in the control group. After applying the criteria for an ALL reconstruction indication, 33 patients were assigned to the ACL Group and 30 patients to the ACL+ALL Group. Regarding knee and hip muscle function, both groups presented worse results when compared to the control group, however, did not show significant differences compared to each other. Regarding the functional variables, the ACL+ALL group showed a significantly shorter distance achieved in the Crossover Hop Test than the other groups, as well as more pain during the tests.

Knee and hip muscular functions are impaired after an ACL injury and do not seem to be influenced or worsened in individuals with greater rotational instability with clinical indications for combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate and the anterolateral ligaments of the knee.

Both dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) and reconstruction (RECO) are common treatment methods for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. We report short term outcomes after DIS (Ligamys, Mathys, Bettlach, Switzerland) and RECO using semitendinosus tendon. We compared postoperative complications, deficits of range-of-motion (ROM), and revision rates between the two treatment options.

A total of 690 patients (437 male, 253 female), after either DIS or RECO, were included. Of these, 147 patients (21%) received DIS and 543 (79%) underwent RECO. Follow-up examination focused on clinical examination, complications and revision rates. Anteroposterior instability and ROM deficits were analyzed in order to evaluate our policy of early intervention for all cases of ROM restrictions.

Relevant ROM restrictions occurred at a significantly higher rate after DIS than after RECO (4.8% vs. 1.3%; p = 0.008). Flexion was more restricted after DIS than RECO (110° vs. 124°, p < 0.001). Extension deficits also occurred more frequently after DIS compared to RECO (49.7% vs. 24.5%; p < 0.001). Total revision surgery rate was 9.1%, with patients after DIS being significantly more frequently affected (20.4% vs. 6.1%; p < 0.001).

Our findings indicate a significantly higher risk for ROM restriction after DIS compared to RECO, resulting in a significantly higher revision rate.

The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a crucial connective tissue in the knee joint (tibiofemoral joint). Although the surgical anatomy of this ligament has been studied and interpreted for decades, it remains a topic of discussion among surgeons. The ACL has two bundles, the anteromedial (AM) and the posterolateral (PL) bundle. ACL tears are among the most frequently sustained injuries to the tibiofemoral joint. The ACL is an important rotational stabilizer of the knee joint. The human knee joint can be classified as a complex structure, as it has many ligaments supporting its stability and ensuring required joint mobility. Previously, the outcomes of primary ACL surgery were poor; however, with time, the modalities have improved substantially. There are two methods of performing the reconstruction procedure, the single-bundle method, in which only the AM bundle is reconstructed, and the double-bundle method, in which both the AM and PL bundles of the ACL are reconstructed. Double bundle arthroscopic ACL reconstruction has been recognized as the gold standard procedure. The grafts used for the reconstruction procedure are the tendon of the patella graft and the grafts of the hamstrings. However, one of the drawbacks of performing this surgery is the development of complications, like osteoarthritis. This complication is observed majorly in sports professionals. This article aims to sum up the anatomy of the ACL, its regular tears, the various surgical aspects of managing it, and the advancement of treatment options in the past centuries. Although much has been achieved, detailed scientific studies should be carried out to improve the prognosis and decrease the risk of development of complications.

The purpose of this study was to assess patellar tendon (PT) and quadriceps tendon (QT) thickness on preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in both the sagittal and axial planes, at multiple points along each tendon, and to correlate these findings to anthropometric patient data before anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery.

Patients who underwent PT or QT autograft ACL reconstruction between 2020 and 2022 and who had preoperative MRIs with adequate visualization of the proximal QT and distal PT were retrospectively identified. Patient demographics were recorded (age, height, weight, sex, injury side). Preoperative MRI measurements were performed by 3 independent examiners using standardized protocol. Preoperative MRI measurements were the QT anterior-posterior (AP) thickness at 1, 2, and 4 cm from the proximal patella on axial and sagittal MRI images at the central aspect of the tendon, as well as PT AP thickness at 1, 2, and 4 cm from the distal patella on axial and sagittal MRI images at the central aspect of the tendon.

Forty-one patients (21 females, 20 males) were evaluated, with a mean age of 33.4 years. The quadriceps tendon was significantly thicker than the patellar tendon at all measured locations (P < .0001) with average QT versus PT thickness (in mm) at each level sagittal 1 cm (7.13 vs 4.35), sagittal 2 cm (7.41 vs 4.44), sagittal 4 cm (7.26 vs 4.81), axial 1 cm (7.35 vs 4.50), axial 2 cm (7.63 vs 4.47), axial 4 cm (7.46 vs 4.62), respectively. There were no significant correlations between tendon size and patient body mass index.

The quadriceps tendon is significantly thicker than the patellar tendon at 1, 2, and 4 cm from the patella in both males and females based on preoperative MRI before ACL surgery.

Investigating the thickness of the tendons available for autograft harvest before surgery will give us a better understanding of tendon anatomy in the setting of ACL reconstruction.

The aim of this study was to assess graft failure, revision rate, and functional outcomes after treatment of acute ACL rupture with dynamic intraligamentary stabilization (DIS) Ligamys device one year post surgery. Additionally, differences in functional outcome between patients with and without anteroposterior laxity were assessed. It was hypothesized that the failure rate of DIS was non-inferior to that of previously reported ACL reconstruction (10%).

In this prospectively designed multicenter study, including patients with an acute ACL rupture, DIS was performed within 21 days after rupture. Primary outcome was failure of the graft at 1 year post surgery, defined as 1) re-rupture of the graft, 2) revision of DIS, or 3) a > 3 mm side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation compared to the non-operated knee (∆ATT), measured by the KT1000 device. Additional analysis was performed using a 5 mm threshold. The subjective International Knee Documentation Committee Score (IKDC) and Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) for pain and confidence were used to evaluate functional outcome.

A total of 155 patients were included with a mean age at surgery of 27.8 years (SD 9.4). The mean interval from rupture to DIS was 16.4 days (SD 5.2). At a median follow-up of 13 months (IQR 12-18) the failure rate of the graft was 30.2% (95%CI:22.0-39.4); 11 patients (7%) required secondary reconstructive surgery and of the 105 patients who attended ATT measurement, 24 patients (23%) had an ∆ATT > 3 mm. Secondary analysis, based on a 5 mm threshold, revealed a failure rate of 22.4% (95%CI: 15.2; 31.1). A total of 39 patients (25%) reported at least one complication, comprising mainly arthrofibrosis, traumatic re-rupture and pain. In these patients, removal of the monoblock was performed in 21 cases (13.5%). At follow-up no significant differences in functional outcomes between patients with ∆ATT > 3 mm and stable ATT were observed.

This prospective multicenter study found a high failure rate at one year follow-up of 30% (7% revision surgery and 23% > 3 mm side-to-side difference in anterior tibial translation) in patients treated by primary repair of the ACL with DIS, and did therefore not demonstrate non-inferiority to ACL reconstruction. For patients who did not require secondary reconstructive surgery, this study found good functional outcomes, also in case of persistent anteroposterior knee laxity (∆ATT > 3 mm).

Level IV.

Common injuries, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, can result in both anterior and rotational instability of the knee. An arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) method has been shown to be effective in restoring anterior translational stability, but this could be followed by persistent rotational instability by means of residual pivot shifts or repeat instability episodes. Alternative techniques, such as a lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET), has been proposed as a technique for preventing persistent rotational instability following ACLR. This article presents a case of a LET using an autologous central slip of iliotibial (IT) band with fixation to the femur using a 1.8-mm knotless all-suture anchor.

The surgical treatment of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries dates back over 100 years from the present day [2022]. While open repair of the torn ACL was popularized in the early 1900s, the first ACL reconstructions utilized the fascia lata as a graft and other extra-articular stabilizing techniques. The first free tendon graft reported for ACL reconstructions was the quadriceps tendon (QT) in the 1930s, followed by the hamstrings tendon (HT), and then the patellar tendon. With improved understanding of the ACL anatomy and biomechanics and the invention of the arthroscope, ACL reconstruction evolved from open procedures to arthroscopic. Similarly, with the help of many surgeon-scientists who reported patient outcomes following ACL reconstruction with various techniques, graft choice evolved with the hamstrings and patellar tendon grafts becoming the dominant and preferred choice of both surgeons and patients. In present day, we see a resurgence of one of the original grafts reported, the QT, as well as primary ACL repair. Future research will result in continued advancements of ACL surgical techniques and graft harvesting, which will allow the orthopedic community (including patients and surgeons) to benefit from such innovations and advanced technologies.

Persistent instability of the knee is reported in up to 30% of patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Based on anatomic findings showing that ACL is a flat ribbon-like structure that twists during knee flexion, a new surgical ACL reconstruction technique using a ribbon-like graft has been developed. However the effect of this surgical technique on knee kinematics has not yet been evaluated.

To compare the anteroposterior and rotational stability of the knee after ACL reconstruction using single-bundle (SB) round and ribbon-like grafts in anterolateral-intact/deficient knees.

Controlled laboratory study.

Twelve human fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were tested with a 6 degrees of freedom robotic system. Internal rotation and anterior translation of the knee were recorded from 0° to 90° of flexion. A full kinematic assessment was performed in each of the following conditions: (1) intact knee, (2) after sectioning of the ACL, (3) after ACL reconstruction using a SB hamstring tendon graft in a round configuration and a ribbon-like configuration, and (4) after sectioning of the anterolateral structures. One-way analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey tests were used for statistical analyses.

When compared with the intact knee, the ACL-deficient knee demonstrated a mean ± SD increase in anterior translation and internal rotation of 6.3 ± 2.5 mm (P < .01) and 5.8°± 2.3° (P < .01), respectively. After ACL reconstruction using a SB ribbon-like graft, the mean difference in anterior translation and internal rotation as compared with the intact knee was -0.1 ± 1.5 mm (P = .842) and 0.0°± 1.1° (P = .999). These differences from the intact knee were also not significant after ACL reconstruction using a round graft (-0.1 ± 1.3 mm, P = .999; -0.5°± 1.5°, P = .401). In the ACL-reconstructed knee using either a ribbon-like or round graft, sectioning of the anterolateral structures did not induce a significant increase of anterior translation and internal rotation of the knee.

ACL reconstruction using a SB ribbon-like or round graft restored the kinematics of the intact knee at time zero. Secondary sectioning of the anterolateral structures in the ACL-reconstructed knee using both types of graft did not significantly affect the anterior translation and internal rotation of the knee.

This is the first biomechanical study on the new ACL reconstruction technique using a ribbon-like graft.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears are frequent ligamentous injuries that necessitate reconstruction in many cases. The patellar tendon and the hamstring tendon are the most frequently utilized autografts for reconstruction. However, both have certain disadvantages. We hypothesized that the peroneus longus tendon would be an acceptable graft for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. The aim of this study is to determine whether a peroneus Longus tendon transplant is a functionally viable option for arthroscopic ACL reconstruction without compromising donor ankle activity. In this prospective study 439 individuals aged between 18 to 45 years, who underwent ACL reconstruction using ipsilateral Peroneus longus tendon autograft were observed. The injury to the ACL was initially assessed by physical examinations and further confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The outcome was assessed at 6, 12, and 24 months after the surgery using Modified Cincinnati, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Tegner-Lysholm scores. The donor ankle stability was evaluated using foot and ankle disability index (FADI) and AOFAS scores, as well as hop tests. Significant (P < .001) improvement in the result of the IKDC score, Modified Cincinnati, and Tegner-Lysholm score was observed at the final follow-up. The Lachman test was mildly (1+) positive only in 7.70% of cases, the anterior drawer became negative in all cases, and the pivot shift test was negative in 97.43% of cases at 24 months after the surgery. FADI and AOFAS scores for donor's ankle functional assessment were impressive, as were single hop test, triple hop test, and cross over hop test results at 2 years. None of the patients had any neurovascular deficit. However, 6 cases of superficial wound infection were observed, 4 at the port site and 2 at the donor site. All resolved after appropriate oral antibiotic therapy. The peroneus longus tendon can be considered a safe, effective, and promising graft of choice for arthroscopic primary single-bundle ACL reconstruction because it has a good functional outcome and impressive donor ankle function after surgery.

The prevalence of intra-articular knee injuries and reparative surgeries is increasing in many countries. Alarmingly, there is a risk of developing post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA) after sustaining a serious intra-articular knee injury. Although physical inactivity is suggested as a risk factor contributing to the high prevalence of the condition, there is a paucity of research characterising the association between physical activity and joint health. Consequently, the primary aim of this review will be to identify and present available empirical evidence regarding the association between physical activity and joint degeneration after intra-articular knee injury and summarise the evidence using an adapted Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluations. The secondary aim will be to identify potential mechanistic pathways through which physical activity could influence PTOA pathogenesis. The tertiary aim will be to highlight gaps in current understanding of the association between physical activity and joint degeneration following joint injury.

A scoping review will be conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist and best-practice recommendations. The review will be guided by the following research question: what is the role of physical activity in the trajectory from intra-articular knee injury to PTOA in young men and women? We will identify primary research studies and grey literature by searching the electronic databases Scopus, Embase: Elsevier, PubMed, Web of Science: all databases, and Google Scholar. Reviewing pairs will screen abstracts, full texts and will extract data. Data will be presented descriptively using charts, graphs, plots and tables.

This research does not require ethical approval due to the data being published and publicly available. This review will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed sports medicine journal irrespective of discoveries and disseminated through scientific conference presentations and social media.

https://osf.io/84pnh/.

The existence and anatomy of the anterolateral ligament (ALL) of the knee are a somewhat controversial topic in orthopaedic surgery. The fixation of the avulsion fracture of the ALL (Segond fracture), associated with periarticular knee fractures, is rarely given much consideration while the major fracture fragments are reconstructed. This study aims to confirm the existence of ALL and evaluate the clinical outcomes of surgical management for avulsion fractures, involving its insertion, when associated with periarticular knee fractures. Twenty-three patients (16 males and 7 females) with avulsion fractures of the ALL associated with periarticular knee fractures were fixed with a spider plate, cannulated screw, or suture anchor. Eight patients were diagnosed with distal femoral fracture, 10 with tibial plateau fracture, and 5 with tibial eminence avulsion fracture. All patients underwent X-rays at follow-up. Clinical and functional outcomes were assessed with the pivot-shift test, objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner activity scale. The ALL was found and identified as a distinct ligamentous structure in all patients. Prior to Segond repair, patients had significantly more instability, as determined by pivot-shift test, than seen postoperatively (p < 0.0001). At final follow-up, the mean subjective IKDC score was 83.2 ± 10.3. Fourteen patients were graded A, 6 were graded B, and 3 was graded C on the IKDC objective score. The mean Lysholm score was 85.4 ± 12.2. The mean Tegner score was 7.5 ± 1.2. This study confirmed that the ALL is a distinct structure in the anterolateral portion of the knee. The fixation of the avulsion fracture of the ALL associated with periarticular knee fractures can be an effective procedure without specific complications. Long-term and comparative follow-up studies are necessary to confirm the effects.

To conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) comparing the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) among patients who underwent either isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction or combined lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) or anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ALLR).

RCTs that compared isolated ACL reconstruction and combined LET or ALLR were included with minimum 12 months follow-up. Studies that used the double-bundle technique were excluded. Outcome assessment included the number of positive pivot shifts, amount of anterior tibial translation, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective, Tegner, and Lysholm scores. Bayesian NMA and the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) were evaluated.

A total of 1,077 patients from 11 RCTs were enrolled in this study. In NMA, the odds ratios (ORs) of positive pivot shift were significantly lower in ACL + ALLR (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.027-0.67) than isolated ACL reconstruction, but no difference between ACL + ALLR and ACL + LET. There were no significant differences in anterior tibial translation among the techniques, but the IKDC subjective and Lysholm scores of ACL + ALLR and ACL + LET were significantly higher than isolated ACL reconstruction. ACL + ALLR were the most preferred in terms of residual pivot shift, anterior tibial translation, and IKDC subjective scores (SUCRA = 88.2%, 86.4%, and 93.1%, respectively). Additional lateral procedures resulted in significantly lower risk of graft failure (OR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.1-0.71) than isolated ACL reconstruction.

ACL + ALLR were found to have significantly better outcomes in terms of knee rotational stability and graft failure rate than isolated ACL reconstructions, but the clinical outcomes were uncertain after a minimum 12 months follow-up. Considering the greatest probability of obtaining better knee rotational stability in this NMA, ACL + ALLR was found to be the most preferred technique for patients with ACL injury.

Level II, network meta-analysis and systematic review of Level I and II studies.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction techniques have evolved over the past four decades. There is evidence that non-anatomic reconstruction techniques, such as traditional transtibial drilling, fail to recreate the native anatomy of the ACL, which can lead to increased rotatory knee instability, revision risk, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis. Anatomic ACL reconstruction has emerged as the gold standard, with the goal of restoring the patient's native anatomy and knee kinematics. This review will summarise the relevant anatomy, modern anatomic ACL reconstruction techniques, and literature supporting anatomic ACL reconstruction as the new paradigm. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, review article.