The incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) in children remains largely unknown, with only 16.5% of children receiving appropriate screening. This study sought to determine the impact of a screening guideline on injury detection and outcomes in children with BCVI.

This was a prospective, multi-institutional observational study of children younger than 15 years with blunt trauma to the head, face, or neck (Abbreviated Injury Scale score, >0) at any of six level 1 pediatric trauma centers. All patients were screened using the Memphis criteria. Head/neck computed tomography angiogram was recommended for those meeting the criteria. Treatment for BCVI was recommended based on overall trauma burden, with 7- to 10-day follow-up imaging.

A total of 2,285 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 520 (23%) (median age, 7.9 years) met the Memphis screening criteria, and 222 (42.5%) received appropriate imaging. A total of 30 BCVIs were identified in 25 patients (1.05%); 22 (88%) had a carotid injury, and 6 (24%) had a vertebral artery injury. Motor vehicle collision was the most common mechanism (42%). Those with BCVIs were older (8.01 years, p = 0.03), with a lower median Glasgow Coma Scale (7.8 vs. 15, p < 0.0001). All but three met the Memphis screening criteria (sensitivity, 88%). Eight (32%) underwent treatment. Six children with BCVI suffered a stroke (24%): two untreated and one treated patient developed a stroke after diagnosis.

Similar to adults, BCVI in children screened has an incidence of 1% (overall incidence of 0.33% in all blunt trauma) and carries a significant risk of stroke. Treatment of BCVI in children in this study is inconsistently applied even after diagnosis, and stroke may still occur with treatment.

Original Research; Level II.

Stroke rate and treatment patterns for children with blunt cerebrovascular injury are not well-described. There exists a gap in knowledge of how children with blunt cerebrovascular injury are treated, the stroke rate associated with antithrombotic therapy, and the optimal time to start treatment.

A retrospective review of the Trauma Quality Improvement Program database was conducted from 2016 to 2022 for children with blunt injury (<18 years) with blunt cerebrovascular injury. Analysis of all children with blunt cerebrovascular injury and subgroups of children without traumatic brain injury, as well as those without contraindications to antithrombotic therapy (no traumatic brain injury, solid-organ injury, or blood transfusion within 24 hours) was performed. Stroke rate and treatment patterns were compared between age groups (0-6, 7-11, 12-14, 15-17 years) and injury grades.

Among 685,631 blunt injured children, 2,336 incurred blunt cerebrovascular injury (0.34%). Stroke rate was greatest in the youngest patients (6.2% 0-6 years; 2.0% 7-11 years) who had the lowest rates of antithrombotic therapy. Fifty-two percent of patients received no antithrombotic therapy during their hospitalization. Children who received antithrombotic therapy had greater rates of stroke compared with those untreated (6.1% vs 2.1%, P < .001) regardless of age group. Low-molecular weight heparin was the most common antithrombotic therapy (28.2%) followed by heparin (14.2%), and aspirin (5.1%).

Children aged 0-11 years had the greatest rates of stroke and were least likely to receive antithrombotic therapy. More than one half of children did not receive antithrombotic therapy. Patients who received antithrombotic therapy had greater stroke rates than untreated patients, which may reflect antithrombotic therapy given after stroke occurred. Treatment guidelines are needed for children with blunt cerebrovascular injury.

Early identification of blunt cerebrovascular injury in the pediatric (<18 years) population (pBVCI) is essential to minimize stroke. However, the most cost-effective screening strategy for pBCVI is unknown, and there is high variability in practice nationwide. We sought to identify the most cost-effective screening strategy for identifying pBCVI and hypothesized that Memphis criteria (MC) would be the most cost-effective due to its high sensitivity.

A Decision Tree analysis model was used to compare the following BCVI screening strategies in peds: (1) no screening (NS); (2) Denver criteria (DC); (3) Expanded Denver criteria (eDC); (4) MC; (5) McGovern criteria (MG); (6) Utah criteria (UC); and (7) universal screening (US). The model considered a range of pBCVI incidences (0.2-2.7 %) and analyzed costs and utilities over a 5-year time horizon. pBCVI cases detected by screening modalities were assumed to be given antithrombotic therapy which mitigates the risk of stroke and mortality.

Our analysis revealed that at low pBCVI incidences, UC was most cost-saving per additional quality-adjusted life year (QALY) compared to NS, while MC yielded the highest savings at high incidences compared to MG. Sensitivity analyses indicated the cost-effectiveness of screening strategies varied significantly with pBCVI incidence.

The cost-effectiveness of pBCVI screening is contingent upon accurate incidence rates, with no one-size-fits-all solution. Pediatric trauma centers should tailor their screening strategies to local pBCVI rates to enhance cost-efficiency and patient outcomes. Further research is needed to better define BCVI incidence rates in children to inform these decisions.

Clinical Research Paper.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) management in children currently follows guidelines developed for adults, with limited data on their efficacy in the pediatric population. This study aimed to explore injury features in the pediatric population with BCVIs and compare the clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric and adult BCVIs.

A retrospective data analysis of BCVI patients was conducted using the PROspective Observational Vascular Injury Treatment (PROOVIT) registry, covering the period from 2013 to 2022. The clinical manifestation, treatment, and outcome were compared between the adult and pediatric populations (<18 years old).

This study included 38 pediatric and 1,310 adult patients with BCVIs. Pediatric patients had a higher median Abbreviated Injury Scale head score (4 vs. 3, P < 0.001) and a lower Glasgow Coma Scale at admission (9 vs. 14, P = 0.005). The 2 groups had no significant differences in Biffl grade injury distribution. Computed tomography angiography was the primary diagnostic method used in both groups (78.9% in pediatrics and 87.8% in adults; P = 0.084). Carotid artery injuries were the most frequently affected vessels in pediatric patients (71%), while vertebral artery injuries were more prevalent in adults (53.4%) (P < 0.001). Treatment methods were similar, with most patients receiving medical treatment (68.4% in pediatrics vs. 77.4% in adults; P = 0.264), although fewer pediatric patients continued medical therapy postdischarge (52.6% vs. 81.1%, P = 0.031). The incidence of BCVI-related stroke was similar between groups (7.9% in pediatrics vs. 6.3% in adults; P = 0.959). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the 2 cohorts, but hospital length of stay differed significantly, with pediatric patients having shorter stays than adults (P = 0.047).

Our findings suggest that the current management patterns for BCVI in children are not significantly different from those in adults. This similarity may reflect the adoption of care strategies based on adult experience in the absence of pediatric-specific guidelines. Additionally, the outcomes in the pediatric population were comparable to those observed in adults, underscoring the potential effectiveness of these adapted approaches while highlighting the need for further research to develop age-specific guidelines for pediatric BCVI management.

Optimal screening for BCVI in pediatric trauma patients remains debated. We hypothesized screening with CTAN would decrease the number of duplicate CT scans per patient and increase BCVI detection rate.

Local BCVI screening institutional protocol changed May 2022 to include Computed Tomography angiography neck (CTAN). We performed a retrospective review of pediatric blunt trauma patients presenting at our Level 1 trauma center between 2019 and 2023. Patients before and after implementation of universal screening were compared for demographic, clinical, radiographic, and outcome data.

Six-hundred-eight patients were included with 368 before and 240 after the protocol change. Screening with CTAN decreased the number of duplicate neck scans (5.7%vs.2.1 ​%,p ​= ​0.03) and increased BCVI detection rate (0.27%v.2.5 ​%,p ​= ​0.01). Of the seven patients diagnosed with BCVI 2019-2023, no patients suffered any stroke-related morbidity.

Universal screening for BCVI in pediatric patients with CTAN resulted in fewer scans and an increased BCVI detection rate.

The internal carotid artery occlusion caused by head and neck trauma, also known as traumatic intracranial artery occlusion, is relatively rare clinically. Traumatic skull base fracture is a common complication of traumatic brain injury. Traumatic skull base fracture is one of the causes of traumatic internal carotid artery occlusion. If not detected early and treated in time, the prognosis of patients is poor. This editorial makes a relevant analysis of this disease.

As of 2020, penetrating injuries became the leading cause of death among children and adolescents ages 1-19 in the United States. For those patients who survive and receive advanced medical care, vascular injuries are a significant cause of morbidity and trigger notable trauma team angst. Moreover, penetrating injuries can lead to life-threatening hemorrhage and/or limb-threatening ischemia if not addressed promptly. Vascular injury management demands timely and unique expertise, particularly for pediatric patients. In part 1 of this review, we discussed the scope and extent of the epidemic of traumatic vascular injuries in pediatric patients, reviewed current evidence and outcomes, discussed various challenges and advantages of a myriad of existing team structures, and outlined potential outcome targets and solutions. However, in order to optimize care for pediatric vascular trauma, we must also understand the fundamental best practice principles, surgical options and approaches, medical management, and recommendations for ongoing, outpatient follow-up. In part 2, we will address the best evidence, combined with expert consensus, regarding strategies for diagnosing, managing, and ongoing follow-up of vascular trauma, with particular focus on the nuances that define the unique approaches to pediatric patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: n/a.

Background: Blunt carotid injury (BCI) in pediatric trauma is quite rare. Due to the low number of cases, only a few reports and studies have been conducted on this topic. This review will discuss how frequent BCI/blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) on pediatric patients after blunt trauma is, what routine diagnostics looks like, if a computed tomography (CT)/computed tomography angiography (CTA) scan on pediatric patients after blunt trauma is always necessary and if there are any negative health effects. Methods: This narrative literature review includes reviews, systematic reviews, case reports and original studies in the English language between 1999 and 2020 that deal with pediatric blunt trauma and the diagnostics of BCI and BCVI. Furthermore, publications on the risk of radiation exposure for children were included in this study. For literature research, Medline (PubMed) and the Cochrane library were used. Results: Pediatric BCI/BCVI shows an overall incidence between 0.03 and 0.5% of confirmed BCI/BCVI cases due to pediatric blunt trauma. In total, 1.1-3.5% of pediatric blunt trauma patients underwent CTA to detect BCI/BCVI. Only 0.17-1.2% of all CTA scans show a positive diagnosis for BCI/BCVI. In children, the median volume CT dose index on a non-contrast head CT is 33 milligrays (mGy), whereas a computed tomography angiography needs at least 138 mGy. A cumulative dose of about 50 mGy almost triples the risk of leukemia, and a cumulative dose of about 60 mGy triples the risk of brain cancer. Conclusions: Given that a BCI/BCVI could have extensive neurological consequences for children, it is necessary to evaluate routine pediatric diagnostics after blunt trauma. CT and CTA are mostly used in routine BCI/BCVI diagnostics. However, since radiation exposure in children should be as low as reasonably achievable, it should be asked if other diagnostic methods could be used to identify risk groups. Trauma guidelines and clinical scores like the McGovern score are established BCI/BCVI screening options, as well as duplex ultrasound.

The low incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) reported in pediatric studies (<1%) might be related to an underreporting due to both the absence of current screening guidelines and the use of inadequate imaging techniques. This research is a review of the literature limited to the last 5 years (2017-2022) about the approach and management of BCVI in pediatrics. The strongest predictors for BCVI were the presence of basal skull fracture, cervical spine fracture, intracranial hemorrhage, Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 8, mandible fracture, and injury severity score more than 15. Vertebral artery injuries had the highest associated stroke rate of any injury type at 27.6% (vs 20.1% in carotid injury). The sensitivity of the well-established screening guidelines of BCVI varies when applied to the pediatric population (Utah score - 36%, 17%, Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma (EAST) guideline - 17%, and Denver criteria - 2%). A recent metaanalysis of 8 studies comparing early computed tomographic angiogram (CTA) to digital subtraction angiography for BCVI detection in adult trauma patients demonstrated high variability in the sensitivity and specificity of CTA across centers. Overall, CTA was found to have a high specificity but low sensitivity for BCVI. The role of antithrombotic as well as the type and duration of therapy remain controversial. Studies suggest that systemic heparinization and antiplatelet therapy are equally effective.

Incidence of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) following hanging in the pediatric population is ill-defined. Current guidelines recommend screening imaging during the initial trauma evaluation. Necessity of screening is questioned given BCVI is considered rare after hanging, especially when asymptomatic. This study aims to elucidate the incidence of BCVI in pediatric hangings and determine the value of radiographic work-up.

A retrospective cohort study was performed of pediatric hangings reported to the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB), 2017-2019. Imaging, diagnoses, and findings suggestive of BCVI, such as Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤8, presence of cervical injury, and soft tissue injury were considered. Statistical analysis was carried out to compare incidence.

197 patients met study criteria, with 179 arriving in the trauma bay with signs of life. BCVI incidence was 5.6% (10 of 179). Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) of the neck was the only reported screening modality in this data set. A CTA was completed in 46% of the cases.

BCVI incidence following pediatric hanging is more common than previously thought. Less than half of patients had a CTA reported in this cohort. This may result in an underestimate. Given the potentially devastating consequences of a missed BCVI, the addition of CTA to initial work-up may be worthwhile to evaluate for cervical vascular injury, but further studies into the outcomes of children who do receive prophylactic therapy are needed.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is rare but significant among children. There are three sets of BCVI screening criteria validated for adults (Denver, Memphis, and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma criteria) and two that have been validated for use in pediatrics (Utah score and McGovern score), all of which were developed using retrospective, single-center data sets. The purpose of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of each set of screening criteria in children using a prospective, multicenter pediatric data set.

A prospective, multi-institutional observational study of children younger than 15 years who sustained blunt trauma to the head, face, or neck and presented at one of six level I pediatric trauma centers from 2017 to 2020 was conducted. All patients were screened for BCVI using the Memphis criteria, but criteria for all five were collected for analysis. Patients underwent computed tomography angiography of the head or neck if the Memphis criteria were met at presentation or neurological abnormalities were detected at 2-week follow-up.

A total of 2,284 patients at the 6 trauma centers met the inclusion criteria. After excluding cases with incomplete data, 1,461 cases had computed tomography angiography and/or 2-week clinical follow-up and were analyzed, including 24 cases (1.6%) with BCVI. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for each set of criteria were respectively 75.0, 87.5, 9.1, and 99.5 for Denver; 91.7, 71.1, 5.0, and 99.8 for Memphis; 79.2, 82.7, 7.1, and 99.6 for Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma; 45.8, 95.8, 15.5, and 99.1 for Utah; and 75.0, 89.5, 10.7, and 99.5 for McGovern.

In this large multicenter pediatric cohort, the Memphis criteria demonstrated the highest sensitivity at 91.7% and would have missed the fewest BCVI, while the Utah score had the highest specificity at 95.8% but would have missed more than half of the injuries. Development of a tool, which narrows the Memphis criteria while maintaining its sensitivity, is needed for application in pediatric patients.

Diagnostic Test/Criteria; Level II.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is defined as blunt trauma to the head and neck leading to damage to the vertebral and/or carotid arteries; debate exists regarding which children are considered at high risk for BCVI and in need of angiographic/vessel imaging. We previously proposed a screening tool, the McGovern score, to identify pediatric trauma patients at high risk for BCVI, and we aim to validate the McGovern score by pooling data from multiple pediatric trauma centers. This is a multi-center, hospital-based, cohort study from all prospectively registered pediatric (<16 years of age) trauma patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) between 2003 and 2017 at six Level 1 pediatric trauma centers. The registry was retrospectively queried for patients who received a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) as a screening method for BCVI. Age, length of follow-up, mechanism of injury (MOI), arrival Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score, and focal neurological deficit were recorded. Radiological variables queried were the presence of a carotid canal fracture, petrous temporal bone fracture, and CT presence of infarction. Patients with BCVI were queried for mode of treatment, type of intracranial injury, artery damaged, and BCVI injury grade. The McGovern score was calculated for all patients who underwent CTA across all data groups. A total of 1012 patients underwent CTA; 72 of these patients were found to have BCVI, 51 of which were in the validation cohort. Across all data groups, the McGovern score has a >80% sensitivity (SN) and >98% negative predictive value (NPV). The McGovern score for pediatric BCVI is an effective, generalizable screening tool.

Our understanding of blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) has changed significantly in recent decades, resulting in a heterogeneous description of diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes in the literature which is not suitable for data pooling. Therefore, we endeavored to develop a core outcome set (COS) to help guide future BCVI research and overcome the challenge of heterogeneous outcomes reporting.

After a review of landmark BCVI publications, content experts were invited to participate in a modified Delphi study. For round 1, participants submitted a list of proposed core outcomes. In subsequent rounds, panelists used a 9-point Likert scale to score the proposed outcomes for importance. Core outcomes consensus was defined as >70% of scores receiving 7 to 9 and <15% of scores receiving 1 to 3. Feedback and aggregate data were shared between rounds, and four rounds of deliberation were performed to re-evaluate the variables not achieving predefined consensus criteria.

From an initial panel of 15 experts, 12 (80%) completed all rounds. A total of 22 items were considered, with 9 items achieving consensus for inclusion as core outcomes: incidence of postadmission symptom onset, overall stroke incidence, stroke incidence stratified by type and by treatment category, stroke incidence prior to treatment initiation, time to stroke, overall mortality, bleeding complications, and injury progression on radiographic follow-up. The panel further identified four non-outcome items of high importance for reporting: time to BCVI diagnosis, use of standardized screening tool, duration of treatment, and type of therapy used.

Through a well-accepted iterative survey consensus process, content experts have defined a COS to guide future research on BCVI. This COS will be a valuable tool for researchers seeking to perform new BCVI research and will allow future projects to generate data suitable for pooled statistical analysis with enhanced statistical power.

Level IV.

While blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a rare complication of blunt trauma, it is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. In the pediatric population, unique anatomy and development require screening criteria that accurately diagnose these injuries while limiting unwarranted radiation.

We searched Medline OVID, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that investigated the risk factors of BCVI in individuals younger than 18 years of age. We adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items in Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and assessed the quality of each study using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. We compared key characteristics of the papers, including incidence of BCVI, incidence of risk factors, and statistical significance of risk factors.

Of 1304 studies, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 15 were retrospective cohort studies and one was a retrospective case control study. Most of the studies included all pediatric blunt trauma admissions, but four only included those which underwent imaging, one only included those with cervical seatbelt sign, and one excluded those who did not survive 24-h post-admission. The ages included as pediatric varied between papers. Papers examined different risk factors and reported differing statistical significances. Though no single risk factor was found to be statistically significant in every study, cervical spine and skull fractures were found to be significant by most. Maxillofacial fractures, depressed GCS score, and stroke were found to be statistically significant by multiple studies. Twelve studies examined cervical soft tissue injury, and none found it to be statistically significant.

The risk factors most found to be statistically significant for BCVI were cervical spine fracture (10/16 studies), skull fracture (9/16), maxillofacial fractures (7/16), depressed GCS score (5/16), and stroke (5/16). There is a need for prospective studies on this topic.

Level III, Systematic Review.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a rare finding in trauma patients. The previously validated BCVI (Denver and Memphis) prediction model in adult patients was shown to be inadequate as a screening option in injured children. We sought to improve the detection of BCVI by developing a prediction model specific to the pediatric population.

The National Trauma Databank (NTDB) was queried from 2007 to 2015. Test and training datasets of the total number of patients (885,100) with complete ICD data were used to build a random forest model predicting BCVI. All ICD features not used to define BCVI (2268) were included within the random forest model, a machine learning method. A random forest model of 1000 decision trees trying 7 variables at each node was applied to training data (50% of the dataset, 442,600 patients) and validated with test data in the remaining 50% of the dataset. In addition, Denver and Memphis model variables were re-validated and compared to our new model.

A total of 885,100 pediatric patients were identified in the NTDB to have experienced blunt pediatric trauma, with 1,998 (0.2%) having a diagnosis of BCVI. Skull fractures (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.004), extremity fractures (OR 1.001, 95% 1.0006-1.002), and vertebral injuries (OR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003-1.004) were associated with increased risk for BCVI. The BCVI prediction model identified 94.4% of BCVI patients and 76.1% of non-BCVI patients within the NTDB. This study identified ICD9/ICD10 codes with strong association to BCVI. The Denver and Memphis criteria were re-applied to NTDB data to compare validity and only correctly identified 13.4% of total BCVI patients and 99.1% of non BCVI patients.

The prediction model developed in this study is able to better identify pediatric patients who should be screened with further imaging to identify BCVI.

Retrospective diagnostic study-level III evidence.

Pediatric cervical spine, blunt cerebrovascular, and penetrating palate injuries are rare but potentially life-threatening injuries that demand immediate stabilization and treatment. Balancing the risk of a missed injury with radiation exposure and the need for sedation is critical in evaluating children for these injuries. Unfortunately, effective clinical decision tools used in adult trauma cannot be uniformly applied to children. Careful risk stratification based on history, mechanism and examination is imperative to evaluate these injuries judiciously in the pediatric population. This article presents a review of the most up-to-date literature on pediatric neck trauma.

Pediatric cervical spine (CSI) and blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) are challenging to evaluate as they are rare but carry high morbidity and mortality. CT scans are the traditional imaging modality to evaluate for CSI/BCVI, but involve radiation exposure and potential future increased risk of malignancy. Therefore, we present results from the implementation of a combined CSI/BCVI pediatric trauma clinical pathway to aid clinicians in their decision-making.

We conducted a 2-year retrospective cohort study analyzing data pre and post implementation of the combined CSI/BCVI pathway. Data was obtained from a level 1 pediatric trauma center and included blunt trauma patients under the age of 14. We evaluated the use of cervical spine computed tomography (CT), CT angiography, and plain radiographs, as well as missed injuries and provider pathway adherence.

We included 358 patients: 209 pre-pathway and 149 post-pathway implementation. Patient mean age was 8.9 years and 61% were male (61% males). There were no significant differences in GCS, AIS, and ISS between pre and post pathway groups. Post pathway implementation saw reduced use of cervical spine CT, although this was not clinically significant (33% vs 31%, p = 0.74). However, cervical spine radiography use increased (9% vs 16%, p = 0.03), and there was also an increase in screening for BCVI injuries with higher use of CTA (5% vs 7%, p = 0.52). A total of 12 CSI and 3 BCVI were identified with no missed injuries. Provider adherence to the pathway was modest (54%). Conclusion Implementation of a combined CSI/BCVI clinical pathway for pediatric trauma patients increased screening radiography and did not miss any injuries. However, CT use did not significantly decrease and provider adherence was modest, supporting the need for further implementation analysis and larger studies to validate the pathway's sensitivity and specificity for CSI/BCVI.

Blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) of the neck are a common cause for concern after blunt trauma. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate whether patients with a cervical seat belt sign in the absence of associated high-risk injuries or neurological symptoms are at an increased risk for developing a clinically significant vascular injury and therefore require a screening neck computed tomographic angiography (CTA).

A retrospective review was performed of patients who presented after motor vehicle collision and received a neck CTA for an indication of "seat belt sign." Imaging was reviewed to determine the vascular injury grade, associated injuries, and, if available, follow-up imaging was reviewed to assess for interval change or resolution. The patients were split into 2 groups. Group 1 included patients without high-risk injuries, and group 2 included patients with high-risk injuries.

In group 1, 6 (2.9%) of 208 patients had BCVI. In group 2, 7 (18.9%) of 37 patients had BCVI. Patients in group 2 were 6.5 times more likely to suffer BCVI compared with group 1 (P < 0.001). No patient in group 1 was ever symptomatic, and only 1 (0.5%) patient underwent interventional treatment.

Patients presenting after blunt trauma with a seat belt sign and no other high-risk injuries as laid out by screening criteria demonstrate a low probability of BCVI and an even lower likelihood of adverse outcome.

Ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke can occur in the setting of pediatric trauma, particularly those with head or neck injuries. The risk of stroke appears highest within the first two weeks after trauma. Stroke diagnosis may be challenging due to lack of awareness or concurrent injuries limiting detailed neurological assessment. Other injuries may also complicate stroke management, with competing priorities for blood pressure, ventilator management, or antithrombotic timing. Here we review epidemiology, clinical presentation, and diagnostic approach to blunt arterial injuries including dissection, cerebral sinovenous thrombosis, mineralizing angiopathy, stroke from abusive head trauma, and traumatic hemorrhagic stroke. Owing to the complexities and heterogeneity of concomitant injuries in stroke related to trauma, a single pathway for stroke management is impractical. Therefore providers must understand the goals and possible costs or consequences of stroke management decisions to individualize patient care. We discuss the physiological principles of cerebral perfusion and oxygen delivery, considerations for ventilator strategy when stroke and lung injury are present, and current available evidence of the risks and benefits of anticoagulation to provide a framework for multidisciplinary discussions of cerebrovascular injury management in pediatric patients with trauma.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) occurs in <1% of pediatric patients. The two principal screening criteria for BCVI in children are the Utah and McGovern Score with motor vehicle accident (MVA) considered to be a predictor for BCVI. We sought to confirm previously reported risk factors and identify novel associations with BCVI in pediatric patients.

The Pediatric Trauma Quality Improvement Program (2014-2016) was queried for patients younger than 16 years presenting after blunt trauma. A multivariable logistic regression was used to determine risk of BCVI.

From 69,149 pediatric patients, 109 (<0.2%) had BCVI. The median age was 13 years, and the median Injury Severity Score was 25. More than half the patients were involved in MVAs (53.2%) and had a skull base fracture (53.2%). Factors independently associated with BCVI include skull base fracture (odds ratio [OR], 3.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.40-6.14; p < 0.001), cervical spine fracture (OR, 3.15; 95% CI, 1.91-5.18; p < 0.001), intracranial hemorrhage (OR, 3.11; 95% CI, 1.89-5.14; p < 0.001), Glasgow Coma Scale score of 8 or less (OR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.33-3.54; p = 0.003), and mandible fracture (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.05-3.84; p = 0.04). Motor vehicle accident was not an independent predictor for BCVI (p = 0.07).

In the largest analysis of pediatric BCVI to date, skull base fracture had the strongest association with BCVI. Other associations to pediatric BCVI included cervical spine and mandible fracture. Motor vehicle accident, previously identified to be associated with BCVI, was not an independent risk factor in our analysis. A future multicenter study incorporating newly identified variables in a scoring system to screen for BCVI is warranted.

Level IV (Prognostic/Epidemiologic).

Adult imaging for blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) is based on the Denver and Memphis screening criteria where CT angiogram (CTA) is performed for any one of the criteria being positive. These guidelines have been extrapolated to the pediatric population. We hypothesize that the current adult criteria applied to pediatrics lead to unnecessary CTA in pediatric trauma patients.

At our center, a 9-year retrospective study revealed that strict adherence to the Denver and Memphis criteria would have resulted in 332 unnecessary CTAs out of 2795 trauma patients with only 0.3% positive for BCVI. We also conducted a retrospective chart review of 776,355 pediatric trauma patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2007 to 2014. Data collection included children between ages 0 and 18, ICD-9 search for blunt cerebrovascular injury, and ICD-9 codes that applied to both Denver and Memphis criteria.

Of 776,355 pediatric trauma activations, 81,294 pediatric patients in the NTDB fit the Denver/Memphis criteria for screening CTA neck or angiography based on ICD-9 codes, while only 2136 patients suffered BCVI. Strict utilization of the Denver/Memphis criteria would have led to a negative CTA in 79,158 (97.4%) patients. Multivariate regression analysis indicates that patients with skull base fracture, cervical spine fractures, cervical spine fracture with cervical cord injury, traumatic jugular venous injury, and cranial nerve injury should be considered part of the screening criteria for BCVI.

Our study suggests the Denver and Memphis criteria are inadequate screening criteria for CTA looking for BCVI in the pediatric blunt trauma population. New criteria are needed to adequately indicate the need for CT angiography in the pediatric trauma population.

IV.

Trauma is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the pediatric population. Due to a variety of factors, many pediatric trauma patients are initially evaluated and stabilized at adult hospitals that lack pediatric specific emergency medicine and surgical expertise. While similar to adult patients, the initial evaluation and resuscitation of pediatric patients does differ. Many of these key differences contribute to missed injury and susceptibility to error in the treatment of children. Here, we highlight a variety of differences between pediatric and adult trauma patients and clarify reasoning for these differences. Error traps that are discussed include missed cases of non-accidental trauma, missed blunt cerebrovascular injury, over use of CT (computed tomography) scans with unnecessary radiation exposure, missed small bowel or mesenteric injury, and unrecognized hemodynamic instability.

Studies cite the incidence of pediatric blunt cerebrovascular injuries (BCVI) ranges from 0.03% to 1.3%. While motor vehicle incidents are a known high-risk mechanism, we are the first to report on football injuries resulting in BCVI.

Case 1 is a 14-year-old male football player who presented with slurred speech and facial droop 16 h after injury that had resulted in unilateral stinger on the field. The patient had a negative brain computed tomography (CT) at the onset of symptoms. Given progression of symptoms over the next 24 h, re-evaluation with CT angiography (CTA) of brain and neck showed left internal carotid artery (ICA) dissection, and magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed left middle cerebral artery infarct. Case 2 is a 16-year-old male football player who presented with headache and right hemiparesis immediately following a tackle injury. CT brain and neck were negative at an outside hospital, but he was transferred to us for progressive symptoms, and then CTA showed a left ICA dissection with distal emboli, including occlusive involvement of the intracranial left ICA. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: The diagnosis of BCVI requires a high level of suspicion. Focal neurologic deficits are consistently a risk factor across all screening criteria, including the Denver, Utah, Memphis, and Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma. These current screening criteria, however, may not be sufficient to diagnosis BCVI in children. The addition of the mechanism of injury and attention to the patient's clinical presentation and examination are important to prevent missed diagnosis and poor neurologic outcomes.

Bilateral blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) has been documented in 32 patients in the English-language literature and bilateral carotid-cavernous fistulae (CCFs) have been reported in only 1 patient. Here, we present a case of severe, unexpected bilateral BCVI with bilateral direct CCF and review the literature of BCVI, particularly cases of bilateral injury.

A 65-year-old woman with episodic bradycardia presented after a motor vehicle accident. On arrival, she had a Glasgow Coma Scale of 3T and progressive dilation of her right pupil. Computed tomography imaging showed a 1.8-cm right epidural hematoma (EDH) with 6 mm of right-to-left shift. No acute skull-base fracture or injury in the area of the carotid canal was noted. The patient was treated with 3% hypertonic saline and mannitol before being taken to the operating room for emergent decompression of the hematoma. Although the patient initially presented with an EDH, significant intraoperative hemorrhage was identified during surgical evacuation and later confirmed as bilateral direct CCFs during angiographic evaluation. Because of the patient's devastating injuries, life-extending measures were not continued and the patient died.

A review of the literature indicates that bilateral CCFs are rare, having been reported only once previously. As this case demonstrates, CCFs may occur in high-energy injuries and should be considered even if the patient does not meet traditional screening criteria.

Blunt cerebrovascular injury (BCVI) is a non-penetrating injury to the carotid and/or vertebral artery that may cause stroke in trauma patients. Historically BCVI has been considered rare but more recent publications indicate an overall incidence of 1-2% in the in-hospital trauma population and as high as 9% in patients with severe head injury. The indications for screening, treatment and follow-up of these patients have been controversial for years with few clear recommendations. In an attempt to provide a clinically oriented guideline for the handling of BCVI patients a working committee was created. The current guideline is the end result of this committees work. It is based on a systematic literature search and critical review of all available publications in addition to a standardized consensus process. We recommend using the expanded Denver screening criteria and CT angiography (CTA) for the detection of BCVI. Early antithrombotic treatment should be commenced as soon as considered safe and continued for at least 3 months. A CTA at 7 days to confirm or discard the diagnosis as well as a final imaging control at 3 months should be performed.

Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is used to screen patients for cerebrovascular injury after blunt trauma, but risk factors are not clearly defined in children. This modality has inherent radiation exposure. We set out to better delineate the risk factors associated with blunt cervical vascular injury (BCVI) in children with attention to the predictive value of seatbelt sign of the neck.

We collected demographic, clinical and radiographic data from the electronic medical record and a trauma registry for patients less than age 18 years who underwent CTA of the neck in their evaluation at a Level I trauma center from November 2002 to December 2014 (12 years). The primary outcome was BCVI.

We identified 11,446 pediatric blunt trauma patients of whom 375 (2.7%) underwent CTA imaging. Fifty-three patients (0.4%) were diagnosed with cerebrovascular injuries. The average age of patients was 12.6 years and included 66% males. Nearly half of the population was white (52%). Of those patients who received CTA, 53 (14%) were diagnosed with arterial injury of various grades (I-V). We created models to evaluate factors independently associated with BCVI. The independent predictors associated with BCVI were Injury Severity Score >/= 16 (odds ratio [OR] [2.35]; 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.11-4.99%]), infarct on head imaging (OR [3.85]; 95% CI [1.49-9.93%]), hanging mechanism (OR [8.71]; 95% CI [1.52-49.89%]), cervical spine fracture (OR [3.84]; 95% CI [1.94-7.61%]) and basilar skull fracture (OR [2.21]; 95% CI [1.13-4.36%]). The same independent predictors remained associated with BCVI when excluding hanging mechanism from the multivariate regression analysis. Seatbelt sign of the neck was not associated with BCVI (p=0.68).

We have found independent predictors of BCVI in pediatric patients. These may help in identifying children that may benefit from screening with CTA of the neck.