Some anesthetic drugs reduce the amplitude of transcranial electrical motor-evoked potentials (MEPs). Remimazolam, a new benzodiazepine, has been suggested to have little effect on MEP amplitude. This prospective, preliminary, dose-escalation study aimed to assess whether remimazolam is associated with lower MEP amplitude in a dose-dependent manner.

Ten adult patients scheduled for posterior spinal fusion were included in this study. General anesthesia was induced with a continuous infusion of remifentanil and remimazolam. After the patient lost consciousness, the infusion rate of remimazolam was set to 1 mg/kg/h, and the patient underwent tracheal intubation. Baseline MEPs were recorded under 1 mg/kg/h of remimazolam in a prone position. Thereafter, the infusion rate of remimazolam was increased to 2 mg/kg/h, with a bolus of 0.1 mg/kg. Ten minutes after the increment, the evoked potentials were then recorded again. The primary endpoint was the MEP amplitude recorded in the left gastrocnemius muscle at 2 time points.

There was no difference in MEP amplitude recorded from the left gastrocnemius muscle before and after increasing remimazolam (median [interquartile range]: 0.93 [0.65 to 1.25] mV and 0.70 [0.43 to 1.26] mV, respectively; P =0.08). The average time from the cessation of remimazolam administration to neurological examination after surgery was 4 minutes using flumazenil.

This preliminary study suggests that increasing remimazolam from 1 to 2 mg/kg/h might have an insignificant effect on transcranial electric MEPs.

This pilot study tests the contribution of fluctuating lower motor neuron excitability to motor evoked potential (MEP) variability.

In six pediatric patients with idiopathic scoliosis and normal neurologic examination, cascades of 30 intraoperative H-reflexes (HRs) and MEPs were evoked in the soleus muscle using constant-current stimulators and recorded through surface electrodes with a 20-second interstimulus interval. First, HRs were obtained with an intensity capable of evoking the maximum response. Subsequently, MEPs were obtained with double trains and an intensity of 700 to 900 mA. Coefficients of variation (CVs) of amplitude and area under the curve from HRs and MEPs were compared using a paired two-tailed Student t test. Coefficients of correlation between the mean CVs of HR and MEP parameters were also assessed.

Pooling the results from the six patients, the mean CV of amplitude from the MEP (24.6 ± 3) was significantly higher than that from the HR (3.5 ± 4.4) ( P = 0.000091). The mean CV of the MEP area under the curve (21.8 ± 4.8) was also statistically significantly higher than that from the HR area under the curve (3.4 ± 4.5) ( P = 0.00091). The coefficients of correlation of the mean CV of the HR amplitude and area under the curve compared with the corresponding values of the MEP were low ( r = 0.29) and very low ( r = 0.03), respectively.

Our results suggest that fluctuations in lower motor neuron excitability may be less important than previously thought to explain the magnitude of MEP variability. The efficacy of corticospinal volleys to recruit a larger and more stable lower motor neuron population would be critical to obtain reproducible MEPs.

Intraoperative neurologic monitoring can be useful, but transcranial motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs) are sensitive to anesthetic agents. We compared the effects of anesthetics on the newly developed transesophageal motor evoked potentials (TeMEPs) with those on TcMEPs.

Eleven pigs (25.6 ± 0.8 kg) were anesthetized by desflurane inhalation, remifentanil was maintained at 0.5 µg/kg/min until the end of the experiment. End-tidal desflurane concentration was then maintained at 7, 4, 10, and 13%, and TcMEPs and TeMEPs were measured at each concentration. Desflurane was then discontinued and propofol was infused at 10, 20, 40, and 60 mg/kg/h, and TcMEPs and TeMEPs were measured at each infusion dose. An electroencephalogram monitor was used to measure the hypnotic level.

Both desflurane and propofol anesthesia decreased bispectral index in a dose-dependent manner (P < 0.0001), replicating shallow (or adequate) to deep hypnotic levels in both anesthetic methods. The amplitude of TeMEPs was clearly larger than that of TcMEPs and was significantly larger at all anesthetic depths and all limb sites (P < 0.0001). Amplitudes of the lower extremities were lower than those of the upper extremities (P < 0.0001) for both TcMEPs and TeMEPs, but the amplitudes of TeMEPs were sufficiently large under desflurane as under propofol. The trend of concentration-dependent decrease in the amplitudes of TeMEPs under both anesthetics was not as apparent as in that of TcMEPs.

TeMEPs are more tolerant to anesthesia than TcMEPs and may be a promising MEP monitoring technique for the lower corticospinal tract.

Multimodal intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM)-such as monitoring muscle-evoked potentials after transcranial electrical stimulation (Tc-MEP) with somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) after electrical stimulation of the peripheral nerve-is recommended in spine surgeries to prevent iatrogenic neurological complications. However, the effect of using Tc-MEP with SEP to protect against neurological complications, particularly motor function, remains unknown. In clinical settings, changes due to Tc-MEP meeting the alarm points must be a potential neurological injury. This retrospective study, focusing on true-positive (TP) cases, aimed to clarify the change in the SEP waveform simultaneously with the Tc-MEP alarm.

We included 68 patients with TP who had Tc-MEP changes and new postoperative motor weakness at more than one level of the manual muscle test after surgery. We compared the cases based on the category of spine surgery and paralysis type. We evaluated sex, age at spine surgery (high- or non high-risk), and paralysis type (segmental, long tract, or both). We defined the alarm points as follows: >70% decrease in Tc-MEP wave amplitudes, >50% decrease in wave amplitudes, or 10% extension of SEP latency. Next, we evaluated the SEP wave changes with a Tc-MEP alarm.

All patients showed progressive motor weakness after surgery, and 21 patients (31%) showed SEP changes at the same time as the Tc-MEP alarm. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratio of SEP change between the two groups according to the spine surgery category or among the three groups according to the paralysis type.

Multimodal IONM is an important tool. However, the SEP changes do not necessarily appear immediately after the Tc-MEP alarm. Spine surgeons should appropriately treat Tc-MEP alarms to preserve motor function, regardless of SEP changes.

The objective of this study is to investigate the poor recordability characteristics of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) for metastatic spinal tumors, focusing on tumor status or preoperative muscle weakness.

A total of 132 patients (age 65.3±11.8 years; 82 men) with or without preoperative lower extremity muscle weakness were included in this study. The patients' background characteristics, the presence and degree of pre- and postoperative muscle weakness, and the IONM outcome, including the availability of transcranial motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) recording and the occurrence of Tc-MEP alarms, were investigated. The data between the groups with and without preoperative muscle weakness were compared. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the risk factors for unrecordable Tc-MEP.

Sixty-seven patients with muscle weakness had significantly more unrecordable Tc-MEP (19% vs. 5%, p=0.009) than the 65 patients without muscle weakness. The highest percentage of recordable Tc-MEP in the group with muscle weakness was noted in the plantar muscle (72%). Multivariate analysis identified manual muscle test (MMT) score of ≤3 (odds ratio [OR] 4.529) and ventral spinal cord compression by metastatic tumor (OR 3.924) as independent significant factors for unrecordable Tc-MEP.

IONM for metastatic spinal cord tumors with muscle weakness had a high rate of unrecordable Tc-MEP. Additionally, Tc-MEP may not be detectable in cases of ventral spinal cord compression by a tumor; therefore, preoperative imaging should be thoroughly evaluated.

Background Intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM) plays a crucial role in preventing peripheral nerve injury during total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, its efficacy in THA remains controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of IONM in preventing peripheral nerve injury during THA. Methods This study retrospectively included 79 hips in 72 patients (primary THA: 43 hips; revision THA: 36 hips) with risk factors for intraoperative nerve injury who underwent motor evoked potential (MEP) monitoring combined with THA between July 2011 and March 2019. A concerning MEP change was defined as a decrease to <30%. The frequency and cause of the MEP change and the presence of postoperative neurological symptoms were investigated. Results Motor evoked potential changes were detected in five of the 79 hips (6.3%). In one of these cases, the potential amplitude did not recover, and transient postoperative muscle weakness was observed due to the delayed detection of MEP changes. In the remaining cases, the potential change was quickly detected by IONM, including the regular-interval monitoring method, without any subsequent postoperative muscle weakness. Conclusions Intraoperative nerve monitoring effectively prevented peripheral nerve injury during THA, particularly in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) or a history of hip surgery. To prevent irreversible postoperative neuropathy, regular interval nerve monitoring, and free-run electromyography should be considered routine techniques in THA for patients with DDH or a history of hip surgery.

Prospective multicenter study.

To investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in thoracic spine surgery and evaluate the impact of specific factors associated with positive predictive value (PPV).

One thousand hundred and fifty-six cases of thoracic spine surgeries were examined by comparing patient backgrounds, disease type, preoperative motor status, and Tc-MEP alert timing. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude decrease of more than 70% from the baseline waveform. Factors were compared according to preoperative motor status and the result of Tc-MEP alerts. Factors that showed significant differences were identified by univariate and multivariate analysis.

Overall sensitivity was 91.9% and specificity was 88.4%. The PPV was significantly higher in the preoperative motor deficits group than in the preoperative no-motor deficits group for both high-risk (60.3% vs 38.3%) and non-high-risk surgery groups (35.1% vs 12.8%). In multivariate logistic analysis, the significant factors associated with true positive were surgical maneuvers related to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (odds ratio = 11.88; 95% CI: 3.17-44.55), resection of intradural intramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 8.83; 95% CI: 2.89-27), preoperative motor deficit (odds ratio = 3.46; 95% CI: 1.64-7.3) and resection of intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumor (odds ratio = 3.0; 95% CI: 1.16-7.8). The significant factor associated with false positive was non-attributable alerts (odds ratio = .28; 95% CI: .09-.85).

Surgeons are strongly encouraged to use Tc-MEP in patients with preoperative motor deficits, regardless of whether they are undergoing high-risk spine surgery or not. Knowledge of PPV characteristics will greatly assist in effective Tc-MEP enforcement and minimize neurological complications with appropriate interventions.

A prospective web-based survey.

Although intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is critical in spine surgery, its usage is largely based on the surgeon's discretion, and studies on its usage trends in Asia-Pacific countries are lacking. This study aimed to examine current trends in IONM usage in Asia-Pacific countries.

IONM is an important tool for minimizing neurological complications and detecting spinal cord injuries after spine surgery. IONM can be performed using several modalities, such as transcranial electrical stimulation-muscle evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) and somatosensory evoked potentials (SEP).

Spine surgeons of the Asia-Pacific Spine Society were asked to respond to a web-based survey on IONM. The questionnaire covered various aspects of IONM, including its common modality, Tc-MEP details, necessities for consistent use, and recommended modalities in major spine surgeries and representative surgical procedures.

Responses were received from 193 of 626 spine surgeons. Among these respondents, 177 used IONM routinely. Among these 177 respondents, 17 mainly used SEP, whereas the majority favored Tc-MEPs. Although a >50% decrease is the commonly used alarm point in Tc-MEP, half of the Tc-MEP users had no protocols planned for such scenarios. Moreover, half of the Tc-MEP users experienced complications, with bite injuries being the most common. Most respondents strongly recommended IONM in deformity surgery for pediatric and adult populations and tumor resection surgery for intramedullary spinal cord tumors. Conversely, IONM was the least recommended in lumbar spinal canal stenosis surgery.

Spine surgeons in Asia-Pacific countries favored IONM use, indicating widespread routine utilization. Tc-MEP was the predominant modality for IONM, followed by SEPs.

Thoracic spinal stenosis (TSS) is secondary to different pathologies that differ in clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes.

This study aimed to determine the optimal warning thresholds for combined somatosensory-evoked potentials (SSEP) and motor-evoked potentials (MEP) for predicting postoperative neurological deterioration in surgical treatment for TSS based on different pathologies. Additionally, we explored the correlation between SSEP/MEP monitoring and postoperative spinal neurological function.

Retrospective study.

Two hundred five patients.

We obtained perioperative modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scores to assess spinal neurological function.

The data collected in this study included demographic data, intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) signals, and perioperative neurological function assessments. To determine the optimal IONM warning threshold, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used. Additionally, Pearson correlation analysis was conducted to determine the correlation between IONM signals and clinical neurological conditions.

A total of 205 consecutive patients were eligible. Forty-one patients had thoracic disc herniation (TDH), 14 had ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), 124 had ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF), and 26 had OPLL+OLF. The mean mJOA scores before surgery and 3 months after surgery were 7.0 and 7.9, respectively, resulting in a mean mJOA recovery rate (RR) of 23.1%. The average postoperative mJOA RRs for patients with TDH, OPLL, OLF, and OPLL+OLF were 24.8%, 10.4%, 26.8%, and 11.2%, respectively. Patients with OPLL+OLF exhibited a more stringent threshold for IONM changes. This included a lower amplitude cutoff value (a decrease of 49.0% in the SSEP amplitude and 57.5% in the MEP amplitude for short-term prediction) and a shorter duration of waveform change (19.5 minutes for SSEP and 22.5 minutes for MEP for short-term prediction). On the other hand, patients with TDH had more lenient IONM warning criteria (a decrease of 49.0% in SSEP amplitude and 77.5% in MEP amplitude for short-term prediction; durations of change of 25.5 minutes for SSEP and 32.5 minutes for MEP). However, OPLL patients or OLF patients had moderate and similar IONM warning thresholds. Additionally, there was a stronger correlation between the SSEP amplitude variability ratio and the JOA RR in OPLL+OLF patients, while the correlation was stronger between the MEP amplitude variability ratio and the JOA RR for the other three TSS pathologies.

Optimal IONM change criteria for prediction vary depending on different TSS pathologies. The optimal monitoring strategy for prediction varies depending on TSS pathologies.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) is a crucial advancement in neurosurgery, enhancing procedural safety and precision. This technique involves continuous real-time assessment of neurophysiological signals, aiding surgeons in timely interventions to protect neural structures. In addition to inherent limitations, IONM necessitates a detailed anesthetic plan for accurate signal recording. Given the growing importance of IONM in neurosurgery, we conducted a narrative review including the most relevant studies about the modalities and their application in different fields of neurosurgery. In particular, this review provides insights for all physicians and healthcare professionals unfamiliar with IONM, elucidating commonly used techniques in neurosurgery. In particular, it discusses the roles of IONM in various neurosurgical settings such as tumoral brain resection, neurovascular surgery, epilepsy surgery, spinal surgery, and peripheral nerve surgery. Furthermore, it offers an overview of the anesthesiologic strategies and limitations of techniques essential for the effective implementation of IONM.

Although the application of cryoablation to metastatic spinal tumors has been attempted, spinal cryoablation has the unique complication of cryogenic spinal cord injury. This study aimed to elucidate the conditions for the development of cryogenic spinal cord injury.

Fifteen canines were used in this study. A metal probe was inserted into the 13th thoracic vertebral body. Cryoablation was performed for 10 minutes by freezing the probe in liquid nitrogen. The control canine underwent probe insertion only. Spinal cord monitoring, epidural temperature measurement, motor function assessment, and pathologic examination of the spinal cord were performed.

During the 10 minutes of cryoablation, the epidural temperature decreased and reached the lowest epidural temperature (LET) at the end of cryoablation. The LETs (degrees celsius [°C]) of each canine were -37, -30, -27, -8, -3, -2, 0, 1, 4, 8, 16, 18, 20, and 25, respectively. As the epidural temperature decreased, waveform amplitudes also decreased. At the end of cryoablation (10 minutes after the start of cryoablation), abnormal waves were observed in 92.9% (13/14) of canines. With epidural rewarming, the amplitude of the waveforms tended to recover. After epidural rewarming (2 hours after the start of cryoablation), abnormal waves were observed in 28.6% (4/14) of canines. The LETs (°C) of the canines with abnormal waves after epidural rewarming were -37, -30, -27, and -8. None of the canines with normal waves after epidural rewarming had any motor impairment. In contrast, all canines with remaining abnormal waves after epidural rewarming had motor impairment. In the pathologic assessment, cryogenic changes were found in canines with LETs (°C) of -37 -30, -27, -8, 0, and 1.

This study showed that 10-minute spinal cryoablation with LETs (°C) of -37, -30, -27, -8, 0, and 1 caused cryogenic spinal cord injury. There was no evidence of cryogenic spinal cord injury in canines with LET of ≥4°C. The epidural temperature threshold for cryogenic spinal cord injury is between 1 and 4°C, suggesting that the epidural temperature should be maintained above at least 4°C to prevent cryogenic spinal cord injury.

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

In an effort to prevent intraoperative neurological injury during spine surgery, the use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) has increased significantly in recent years. Using IONM, spinal cord function can be evaluated intraoperatively by recording signals from specific nerve roots, motor tracts, and sensory tracts. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies to evaluate the efficacy of IONM among patients undergoing spine surgery for any indication.

The current systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis statement for Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies (PRISMA-DTA) and was registered on PROSPERO. A comprehensive search was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and SCOPUS for all studies assessing the diagnostic accuracy of neuromonitoring, including somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP), motor evoked potential (MEP) and electromyography (EMG), either on their own or in combination (multimodal). Studies were included if they reported raw numbers for True Positives (TP), False Negatives (FN), False Positives (FP) and True Negative (TN) either in a 2 × 2 contingency table or in text, and if they used postoperative neurologic exam as a reference standard. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated to evaluate the overall efficacy of each modality type using a bivariate model adapted by Reitsma et al, for all spine surgeries and for individual disease groups and regions of spine. The risk of bias (ROB) of included studies was assessed using the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2).

A total of 163 studies were included; 52 of these studies with 16,310 patients reported data for SSEP, 68 studies with 71,144 patients reported data for MEP, 16 studies with 7888 patients reported data for EMG and 69 studies with 17,968 patients reported data for multimodal monitoring. The overall sensitivity, specificity, DOR and AUC for SSEP were 71.4% (95% CI 54.8-83.7), 97.1% (95% CI 95.3-98.3), 41.9 (95% CI 24.1-73.1) and .899, respectively; for MEP, these were 90.2% (95% CI 86.2-93.1), 96% (95% CI 94.3-97.2), 103.25 (95% CI 69.98-152.34) and .927; for EMG, these were 48.3% (95% CI 31.4-65.6), 92.9% (95% CI 84.4-96.9), 11.2 (95% CI 4.84-25.97) and .773; for multimodal, these were found to be 83.5% (95% CI 81-85.7), 93.8% (95% CI 90.6-95.9), 60 (95% CI 35.6-101.3) and .895, respectively. Using the QUADAS-2 ROB analysis, of the 52 studies reporting on SSEP, 13 (25%) were high-risk, 10 (19.2%) had some concerns and 29 (55.8%) were low-risk; for MEP, 8 (11.7%) were high-risk, 21 had some concerns and 39 (57.3%) were low-risk; for EMG, 4 (25%) were high-risk, 3 (18.75%) had some concerns and 9 (56.25%) were low-risk; for multimodal, 14 (20.3%) were high-risk, 13 (18.8%) had some concerns and 42 (60.7%) were low-risk.

These results indicate that all neuromonitoring modalities have diagnostic utility in successfully detecting impending or incident intraoperative neurologic injuries among patients undergoing spine surgery for any condition, although it is clear that the accuracy of each modality differs.PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42023384158.

(1) To determine probabilities of immediate postoperative new motor deficits after no, reversible, and irreversible motor evoked potentials (MEP) deteriorations and (2) to calculate the same outcome considering whether MEP deteriorations were followed by surgical interventions in the absence of confounding factors.

We analyzed MEPs from 513 surgeries. Four-limb MEPs were evoked by transcranial electrical stimulation. Baseline recordings were obtained before skin incision and updated before instrumentation. Motor evoked potentials deteriorations were considered significant whenever they showed a persistent, reversible, or irreversible amplitude decrease of >80% of the baseline values.

Nine patients showed postoperative new motor deficits. Probabilities of postoperative new motor deficits were null, 2.8%, and 36.8% with no, reversible, and irreversible MEP deteriorations, respectively. The risk of immediate postoperative new motor deficits was significantly lower ( P = 0.0002) in reversible MEP compared with irreversible MEP deteriorations. In patients showing reversible/irreversible MEP deteriorations in the absence of confounding factors, surgical interventions compared with nonsurgical interventions significantly decreased the risk of immediate postoperative new motor deficits ( P = 0.0216).

This study shows that probabilities of immediate postoperative new motor deficits increase with the severity of intraoperative MEP changes. In addition, our results support the value of surgical interventions triggered by MEP deteriorations to reduce postoperative adverse motor outcomes.

Intramedullary tumors are a class of central nervous system tumors with an incidence of 2 to 4%. As they are located very deep and frequently cause postoperative neurological complications, surgical resection is difficult. In recent years, many surgeons have performed electrophysiological monitoring to effectively reduce the occurrence of postoperative neurological complications. Modern electrophysiological monitoring technology has advanced considerably, leading to the development of many monitoring methods, such as SSEPs, MEPs, DCM, and EMG, to monitor intramedullary tumors. However, electrophysiological monitoring in tumor resection is still being studied. In this article, we discussed the different monitoring methods and their role in monitoring intramedullary tumors by reviewing previous studies. Intratumorally tumors need to be monitored for a summary of the condition of the patient. Only by using various monitoring methods flexibly and through clear communication between surgeons and neurophysiological experts can good decisions be made during surgery and positive surgical results be achieved.

There is little information on outcomes for spinal cord tumor treated surgically with instrumentation. Analysis of surgical outcomes and complications in such cases is needed to develop generalizable conclusions and to help inform patients.

The subjects were 41 patients treated with instrumentation surgery for dumbbell type tumor resection. Demographic data; tumor histology, level, and location; number of fused vertebra; use of a bilateral or hemilateral screw; operative time; EBL; TcMEP monitoring; lumbar subarachnoid drainage; duration of subfascial drainage; postoperative motor and sensory deficits; CSF leakage, implant-related complications; time for union of fused vertebra; salvage surgeries, and pre-/postoperative McCormick scale were obtained from medical records. Significant factors related to postoperative motor deficits were identified.

Postoperative motor deficit occurred in 9 cases (22.0%) and all recovered in 30 days after surgery. CSF leakage at 7 days and 2 years after surgery was subfascial (n = 31, n = 6) and subcutaneous (n = 3, n = 4). Cases with postoperative motor deficits more commonly had lower cervical lesions; those with CSF leakage had longer operative times; and those with delayed union had more use of hemilateral instrumentation.

In this study in 41 spinal cord tumors treated surgically with instrumentation, the rate of postoperative motor deterioration was 22.0%, and CSF leakage was found in 17.1%.

Retrospective multicenter cohort study.

We aimed to clarify the efficacy of multimodal intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM), especially in transcranial electrical stimulation of motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) with spinal cord-evoked potentials after transcranial stimulation of the brain (D-wave) in the detection of reversible spinal cord injury in high-risk spinal surgery.

We reviewed 1310 patients who underwent TES-MEPs during spinal surgery at 14 spine centers. We compared the monitoring results of TES-MEPs with D-wave vs TES-MEPs without D-wave in high-risk spinal surgery.

There were 40 cases that used TES-MEPs with D-wave and 1270 cases that used TES-MEPs without D-wave. Before patients were matched, there were significant differences between groups in terms of sex and spinal disease category. Although there was no significant difference in the rescue rate between TES-MEPs with D-wave (2.0%) and TES-MEPs (2.5%), the false-positivity rate was significantly lower (0%) in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group. Using a one-to-one propensity score-matched analysis, 40 pairs of patients from the two groups were selected. Baseline characteristics did not significantly differ between the matched groups. In the score-matched analysis, one case (2.5%) in both groups was a case of rescue (P = 1), five (12.5%) cases in the TES-MEPs group were false positives, and there were no false positives in the TES-MEPs-with-D-wave group (P = .02).

TES-MEPs with D-wave in high-risk spine surgeries did not affect rescue case rates. However, it helped reduce the false-positivity rate.

Triple Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring (IONM) should be considered the standard of care (SOC) for performing cervical surgery for Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament (OPLL). IONM's three modalities and their alerts include; Somatosensory Evoked Potentials (SEP: =/> 50% amplitude loss; =/>10% latency loss), Motor Evoked Potentials (MEP: =/> 70% amplitude loss; =/>10-15% latency loss), and Electromyography (loss of EMG, including active triggered EMG (t-EMG)).

During cervical OPLL operations, the 3 IONM alerts together better detect intraoperative surgical errors, enabling spine surgeons to immediately institute appropriate resuscitative measures and minimize/avoid permanent neurological deficits/injuries.

This focused review of the literature regarding cervical OPLL surgery showed that SEP, MEP, and EMG monitoring used together better reduced the incidence of new nerve root (e.g., mostly C5 but including other root palsies), brachial plexus injuries (i.e., usually occurring during operative positioning), and/or spinal cord injuries (i.e., one study of OPLL patients documented a reduced 3.79% incidence of cord deficits utilizing triple IONM vs. a higher 14.06% frequency of neurological injuries occurring without IONM).

Triple IONM (i.e., SEP, MEP, and EMG) should be considered the standard of care (SOC) for performing cervical OPLL surgery. However, the positive impact of IONM on OPLL surgical outcomes critically relies on spinal surgeons' immediate response to SEP, MEP, and/or EMG alerts/significant deterioration with appropriate resuscitative measures to limit/avert permanent neurological deficits.

Intradural extramedullary spinal cord tumors (IDEMs) cause neurological symptoms due to compression of the spinal cord and caudal nerves. The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of postoperative neurological complications after surgical resection of IDEM and to identify factors associated with such postoperative neurological complications.

We retrospectively analyzed 85 patients who underwent tumor resection for IDEM between 2010 and 2020. We investigated the postoperative worsening of neurological disorders. The patients were divided into two groups: those with and without postoperative neurological complications. Patient demographic characteristics, tumor level, histological type, and surgery-related factors were also compared.

The mean age at the time of surgery was 57.4 years, and histological analysis revealed 45 cases of schwannoma, 34 cases of meningioma, three cases of myxopapillary ependymoma, one case of ependymoma, one case of hemangioblastoma and one case of lipoma. There were five cases (5.8%) of postoperative neurological complications, and four patients improved within 6 months after surgery, and one patient had residual worsening. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, tumor location, preoperative modified McCormick Scale grade, histology, tumor occupancy, or whether fixation was performed in the presence or absence of postoperative neurological complications. All four cases of meningioma with postoperative neurological complications had preoperative neuropathy and meningiomas were located in the anterior or lateral thoracic spine.

Neurological complications after surgical resection for IDEM occurred in 5.8% of patients. Meningiomas with postoperative neurological complications located anteriorly or laterally in the thoracic spine.

Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring (IONM) reportedly helps prevent postoperative neurological complications following high-risk spinal cord surgeries. There are negative and positive reports about using IONM for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors. We investigated factors affecting alerts of IONM in IDEM tumor surgery.

We analyzed 39 patients with IDEM tumors who underwent surgery using IONM at our hospital between January 2014 and March 2021. Neurological symptoms were evaluated pre- and postoperatively using the manual muscle test (MMT). All patients were evaluated to ascertain the tumor level and location in the axial view, the operative time, intraoperative bleeding volume, and histological type. Additionally, the intraoperative procedure associated with significant IONM changes in transcranial electrical stimulation muscle-evoked potential was investigated.

There were 11 false-positive and 16 true-negative cases. There was one true-positive case and one false-negative case; the monitoring accuracy achieved a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 59%, a positive predictive value of 8%, and a negative predictive value of 94%. In the 22 alert cases, if the tumor was located anterolateral in the axial view, alerts were triggered with a significant difference (p = 0.02) during tumor resection. Alerts were generated for fifteen patients during tumor resection; nine (60%) showed waveform improvement by intervention and were classified as rescue cases.

Alert is probably triggered during tumor resection for anterolaterally located tumors. Alerts during tumor resection procedures were more likely to be rescued than other procedures in IDEM tumor surgery.

A prospective multicenter cohort study. To clarify the differences in the accuracy of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (TcE-MEPs) and procedures associated with the alarms between cervical anterior spinal fusion (ASF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF). Neurological complications after TcE-MEP alarms have been prevented by appropriate interventions for cervical degenerative disorders. The differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs and the timing of alarms between cervical ASF and PSF noted in the existing literature remain unclear. Patients (n = 415) who underwent cervical ASF (n = 171) or PSF (n = 244) at multiple institutions for cervical spondylotic myelopathy, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament, spinal injury, and others were analyzed. Neurological complications, TcE-MEP alarms defined as a decreased amplitude of ≤70% compared to the control waveform, interventions after alarms, and TcE-MEP results were compared between the 2 surgeries. The incidence of neurological complications was 1.2% in the ASF group and 2.0% in the PSF group, with no significant intergroup differences (P-value was .493). Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and rate of rescue were 50.0%, 95.2%, 99.4%, and 1.8%, respectively, in the ASF group, and 80.0%, 90.9%, 99.5%, and 2.9%, respectively, in the PSF group. The accuracy of TcE-MEPs was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P-value was .427 in sensitivity, .109 in specificity, and .674 in negative predictive value). The procedures associated with the alarms were decompression in 3 cases and distraction in 1 patient in the ASF group. The PSF group showed Tc-MEPs decreased during decompression, mounting rods, turning positions, and others. Most alarms went off during decompression in ASF, whereas various stages of the surgical procedures were associated with the alarms in PSF. There were no significant differences in the accuracy of TcE-MEPs between the 2 surgeries.

Transcranial electrical stimulation motor-evoked potentials (TES-MEPs) are an intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring method that reduces adverse outcomes in various spine surgeries. Although spine surgeons rarely use TES-MEPs for simple lumbar decompression surgery, we herein firstly report the efficacy of TES-MEPs for lumbar spinal canal stenosis with asymptomatic coexisting cervical canal stenosis.

We report the case of a 71-year-old man who underwent lumbar decompression surgery for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. He had asymptomatic cervical spinal canal stenosis before surgery.

TES-MEPs showed apparent derivation failure of wave amplitudes from the upper and lower limb muscles immediately after posture change from supine to prone for operative preparation. The cervical alignment was corrected. Subsequently, the TES-MEP wave amplitudes became derivable immediately.

While TES-MEPs can be used to prevent neurological deficits in lumbar spine surgery, it can also be used to indirectly monitor other spinal lesions. Based on our experience, we recommend using TES-MEPs even in lumbar spine surgery.

A prospective multicenter observational study.

The aim was to investigate the validity of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEP) in cervical spine surgery and identify factors associated with positive predictive value when Tc-MEP alerts are occurred.

The sensitivity and specificity of Tc-MEP for detecting motor paralysis are high; however, false-positives sometimes occur.

The authors examined Tc-MEP in 2476 cases of cervical spine surgeries and compared patient backgrounds, type of spinal disorders, preoperative motor status, surgical factors, and the types of Tc-MEP alerts. Tc-MEP alerts were defined as an amplitude reduction of more than 70% from the control waveform. Tc-MEP results were classified into two groups: false-positive and true-positive, and items that showed significant differences were extracted by univariate analysis and detected by multivariate analysis.

Overall sensitivity was 66% (segmental paralysis: 33% and lower limb paralysis: 95.8%) and specificity was 91.5%. Tc-MEP outcomes were 33 true-positives and 233 false-positives. Positive predictive value of general spine surgery was significantly higher in cases with a severe motor status than in a nonsevere motor status (19.5% vs . 6.7%, P =0.02), but not different in high-risk spine surgery (20.8% vs . 19.4%). However, rescue rates did not significantly differ regardless of motor status (48% vs . 50%). In a multivariate logistic analysis, a preoperative severe motor status [ P =0.041, odds ratio (OR): 2.46, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.03-5.86] and Tc-MEP alerts during intradural tumor resection ( P <0.001, OR: 7.44, 95% CI: 2.64-20.96) associated with true-positives, while Tc-MEP alerts that could not be identified with surgical maneuvers ( P =0.011, OR: 0.23, 95% CI: 0.073-0.71) were associated with false-positives.

The utility of Tc-MEP in patients with a preoperative severe motor status was enhanced, even in those without high-risk spine surgery. Regardless of the motor status, appropriate interventions following Tc-MEP alerts may prevent postoperative paralysis.

A prospective, multicenter study.

This study clarified the uses and limitations of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) for nerve root monitoring during adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries.

Whether Tc-MEPs can detect nerve root injuries (NRIs) in ASD surgeries remains controversial.

We prospectively analyzed neuromonitoring data from 14 institutions between 2017 and 2020. The subjects were ASD patients surgically treated with posterior corrective fusion using multichannel Tc-MEPs. An alert was defined as a decrease of ≥70% in the Tc-MEP's waveform amplitude from baseline, and NRI was considered as meeting the focal Tc-MEP alerts shortly following surgical procedures with postoperative nerve root symptoms in the selected muscles.

A total of 311 patients with ASD (262 women and 49 men) and a mean age of 65.5 years were analyzed. Tc-MEP results revealed 47 cases (15.1%) of alerts, including 25 alerts after 10 deformity corrections, six three-column osteotomies, four interbody fusions, three pedicle screw placements or two decompressions, and 22 alerts regardless of surgical maneuvers. Postoperatively, 14 patients (4.5%) had neurological deterioration considered to be all NRI, 11 true positives, and three false negatives (FN). Two FN did not reach a 70% loss of baseline (46% and 65% loss of baseline) and one was not monitored at target muscles. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that risk factors of NRI were preexisting motor weakness ( P <0.001, odds ratio=10.41) and three-column osteotomies ( P =0.008, odds ratio=7.397).

Nerve root injuries in our ASD cohort were partially predictable using multichannel Tc-MEPs with a 70% decrease in amplitude as an alarm threshold. We propose that future research should evaluate the efficacy of an idealized warning threshold (e.g., 50%) and a more detailed evoked muscle selection, in reducing false negatives.

Although intraoperative spinal neuromonitoring (IONM) is recommended for spine surgeries, there are no guidelines regarding its use in Japan, and its usage is mainly based on the surgeon's preferences. Therefore, this study aimed to provide an overview of the current trends in IONM usage in Japan.

In this web-based survey, expert spine surgeons belonging to the Japanese Society for Spine Surgery and Related Research were asked to respond to a questionnaire regarding IONM management. The questionnaire covered various aspects of IONM usage, including the preferred modality, operation of IONM, details regarding muscle-evoked potential after electrical stimulation of the brain (Br(E)-MsEP), and need for consistent use of IONM in major spine surgeries.

Responses were received from 134 of 186 expert spine surgeons (response rate, 72%). Of these, 124 respondents used IONM routinely. Medical staff rarely performed IONM without a medical doctor. Br(E)-MsEP was predominantly used for IONM. One-third of the respondents reported complications, such as bite injuries caused by Br(E)-MsEP. Interestingly, two-thirds of the respondents did not plan responses to alarm points. Intramedullary spinal cord tumor, scoliosis (idiopathic, congenital, or neuromuscular in pediatric), and thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament were representative diseases that require IONM.

IONM has become an essential tool in Japan, and Br(E)-MsEP is a predominant modality for IONM at present. Although we investigated spine surgeries for which consistent use of IONM is supported, a cost-benefit analysis may be required.

A prospective, multicenter study.

To evaluate the usefulness of transcranial motor-evoked potentials (Tc-MEPs) during supine-to-prone position change for thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (T-OPLL).

Supine-to-prone position change might be a risk of spinal cord injury in posterior decompression and fusion surgeries for T-OPLL.

The subjects were 145 patients with T-OPLL surgically treated with posterior decompression and fusion using Tc-MEPs in 14 institutes. Tc-MEPs were monitored before surgery from supine-to-prone position and intraoperatively in seven institutes and only intraoperatively in the other seven institutes because of disapproval of the anesthesia department. In cases of Tc-MEP alert after position change, we adjusted the cervicothoracic posture. When the MEP did not recover, we reverted the position to supine and monitored the Tc-MEPs in supine position.

There were 83 and 62 patients with/without Tc-MEP before position change to prone (group A and B). The true-positive rate was lower in group A than group B, but without statistical significance (8.4% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.12). In group A, five patients who had Tc-MEP alert during supine-to-prone position change were all female and had larger body mass index values and upper thoracic lesions. Among the patients, three underwent surgeries after cervicothoracic alignment adjustment, and two had postponed operations to 1 week later with halo-vest fixation because of repeated Tc-MEP alerts during position change to prone. The Tc-MEP alert at exposure was statistically more frequent in group B than in group A ( P = 0.033).

Tc-MEP alert during position change is an important sign of spinal cord injury due to alignment change at the upper thoracic spine. Tc-MEP monitoring before supine-to-prone position change was necessary to prevent spinal cord injury in surgeries for T-OPLL.

Prospective multicenter study.

To examine transcranial motor-evoked potential (Tc-MEP) waveforms in intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring in surgery for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumors, focused on the characteristics for cervical, thoracic, and conus lesions.

IDEM tumors are normally curable after resection, but neurological deterioration may occur after surgery. Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using Tc-MEPs during surgery is important for timely detection of possible neurological injury.

The subjects were 233 patients with IDEM tumors treated surgically with Tc-MEP monitoring at 9 centers. The alarm threshold was ≥70% waveform deterioration from baseline. A case with a Tc-MEP alert that normalized and had no new motor deficits postoperatively was defined as a rescue case. A deterioration of manual muscle test score ≥1 compared to the preoperative value was defined as postoperative worsening of motor status.

The 233 patients (92 males, 39%) had a mean age of 58.1 ± 18.1 years, and 185 (79%), 46 (20%), and 2 (1%) had schwannoma, meningioma, and neurofibroma. These lesions had cervical (C1-7), thoracic (Th1-10), and conus (Th11-L2) locations in 82 (35%), 96 (41%), and 55 (24%) cases. There were no significant differences in preoperative motor deficit among the lesion levels. Thoracic lesions had a significantly higher rate of poor baseline waveform derivation (0% cervical, 6% thoracic, 0% conus, P < 0.05) and significantly more frequent intraoperative alarms (20%, 31%, 15%, P < 0.05). Use of Tc-MEPs for predicting neurological deficits after IDEM surgery had sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 89%; however, the positive predictive value was low.

Poor derivation of waveforms, appearance of alarms, and worse final waveforms were all significantly more frequent for thoracic lesions. Thus, amplification of the waveform amplitude, using multimodal monitoring, and more appropriate interventions after an alarm may be particularly important in surgery for thoracic IDEM tumors.Level of Evidence: 3.

Intramedullary spinal cord tumours are rare and account for about 2-4% of primary CNS tumours. Ependymomas and astrocytomas are most frequent. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term neurological outcome, quality of life (QoL), survival, need for additional treatment and frequency of neuropathic pain in a patient group treated at a tertiary university hospital.

Retrospective descriptive study of 52 long-term survivors with intramedullary or filum tumours consenting to participate in this study. Fifty-six operations were performed in 48 patients. Clinical and radiological follow-up period was 113 and 117 months, respectively.

Good neurological outcome (ASIA score D or E, modified McCormick grade 1 or 2) was achieved in 88%. We found two negative prognostic factors in regards of severe disability which were large craniocaudal tumour size (p = 0.004) and histologic verified astrocytomas (p = 0.002). SF-36 results showed significantly lower results on all five subdomains concerning physical function, whereas scores for mental health and role emotional showed no significant differences compared to Norwegian norms. Ten patients including all astrocytoma patients, one primitive neuroectodermal tumour and three recurrent tumours of filum terminale had adjuvant therapy. None of the patients with intramedullary ependymoma had adjuvant therapy. Neuropathic pain was present in 54% of patients at the last follow-up.

This series shows that good results can be obtained with surgery for intramedullary tumours, even without perioperative neurophysiological monitoring. Multicentre studies are needed for further evaluation of negative and positive prognostic factors to further improve outcome.

This was a prospective multicenter study.

The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative complications of posterior surgeries for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL).

Surgical treatment for cervical OPLL has a high risk of various complications. Laminoplasty (LAMP) and posterior decompression and instrumented fusion (PDF) are effective for multilevel cervical OPLL; however, few studies have focused on the surgical complications of these 2 procedures.

We prospectively included 380 patients undergoing posterior surgeries for cervical OPLL (LAMP: 270 patients, PDF: 110 patients), and investigated the systemic and local complications, including neurological complications. We further evaluated risk factors related to the neurological complications.

Motor palsy was found in 40 patients (10.5%), and motor palsy in the upper extremity was most frequent (8.9%), especially in patients who received PDF (14.5%). Motor palsies involving the lower extremities was found in 6 patients (1.6%). Regarding local complications, dural tears (3.9%) and surgical site infections (2.6%) were common. In the univariate analysis, body mass index, preoperative cervical alignment, fusion surgery, and the number of operated segments were the factors related to motor palsy. Multivariate analysis revealed that fusion surgery and a small preoperative C2-C7 angle were the independent factors related to motor palsy. Motor palsy involving the lower extremities tended to be found at early time points after the surgery, and all the patients fully recovered. Motor palsy in the upper extremities occurred in a delayed manner, and 68.8% of patients with PDF showed good recovery, whereas 81.3% of patients with LAMP showed good recovery.

In posterior surgeries for cervical OPLL, segmental motor palsy in the upper extremity was most frequently observed, especially in patients who received PDF. Fusion and a small preoperative C2-C7 angle were the independent risk factors for motor palsy.

Level III.