• abdominoperineal resection
• circumferential resection margin
• consensus statement
• local excision
• low-anterior resection
• rectal cancer
• rectum
• total mesorectal excision

• Intuitive Surgical

It is well established that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is better than multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) for the accurate diagnosis of pretreatment tumor (T) and node (N) staging of rectal cancer. However, the diagnostic value of MRI and MSCT in local restaging of rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) is controversial. The aim of this study is to investigate the performance of the two imaging exams in restaging of patients with rectal cancer.

Patients with rectal cancer from April 2015 to April 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. The inclusion criteria are as follows: 1) diagnosis of rectal cancer through pathology; 2) NCRT had been performed; 3) all patients had undergone both MSCT and MRI examination before the surgery. Exclusion criteria are as follows: 1) incomplete clinical and imaging data; 2) previous history of pelvic surgery. Two radiologists performed T and N staging of patient images. Diagnostic accuracy, consistency analysis, and error restaging distribution of the two imaging exams for T and N restaging of rectal cancer were assessed using postoperative pathological staging as the gold standard.

A total of 62 patients (49 men; mean age: 59 years; age range 29–83 years) were included in the study. The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT and MRI for T restaging was 51.6% (95% CI 39.3%–63.9%) and 41.9% (95% CI 29.6%–54.2%), respectively, and no statistical difference was found between them (p > 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of MSCT and MRI for N restaging was 56.5% (95% CI 44.2%–68.8%) and 53.2% (95% CI 40.8%–65.6%), respectively, and no statistical difference was found between them (p > 0.05). The consistency analysis showed that T restaging (κ = 0.583, p < 0.001) and N restaging (κ = 0.644, p < 0.001) were similar between MSCT and MRI. There was no significant difference in the distribution of over, accurate, or low staging in T restaging (p > 0.05) and N restaging (p > 0.05) between MSCT and MRI.

MSCT and MRI have similarly poor performance in the diagnosis of preoperative T and N restaging of rectal cancer after NCRT. Neither of them cannot effectively stage the ypT0-1 of rectal cancer. These findings may be of clinical relevance for planning less imaging exam.

• magnetic resonance imaging
• multi-slice computed tomography
• neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
• rectal cancer
• restaging

The accuracy of discriminating pT3a from pT3b-c rectal cancer using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) remains unsatisfactory, although texture analysis (TA) could improve such discrimination.

To investigate the value of TA on apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps in differentiating pT3a rectal adenocarcinomas from pT3b-c tumors.

This was a case-control study of 59 patients with pT3 rectal adenocarcinoma, who underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) between October 2016 and December 2018. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Proven pT3 rectal adenocarcinoma; (2) Primary MRI including high-resolution T2-weighted image (T2WI) and DWI; and (3) Availability of pathological reports for surgical specimens. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Poor image quality; (2) Preoperative chemoradiation therapy; and (3) A different pathological type. First-order (ADC values, skewness, kurtosis, and uniformity) and second-order (energy, entropy, inertia, and correlation) texture features were derived from whole-lesion ADC maps. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to determine the diagnostic value for pT3b-c tumors.

The final study population consisted of 59 patients (34 men and 25 women), with a median age of 66 years (range, 41-85 years). Thirty patients had pT3a, 24 had pT3b, and five had pT3c. Among the ADC first-order textural differences between pT3a and pT3b-c rectal adenocarcinomas, only skewness was significantly lower in the pT3a tumors than in pT3b-c tumors. Among the ADC second-order textural differences, energy and entropy were significantly different between pT3a and pT3b-c rectal adenocarcinomas. For differentiating pT3a rectal adenocarcinomas from pT3b-c tumors, the areas under the curves (AUCs) of skewness, energy, and entropy were 0.686, 0.657, and 0.747, respectively. Logistic regression analysis of all three features yielded a greater AUC (0.775) in differentiating pT3a rectal adenocarcinomas from pT3b-c tumors (69.0% sensitivity and 83.3% specificity).

TA features derived from ADC maps might potentially differentiate pT3a rectal adenocarcinomas from pT3b-c tumors.

• Diffusion-weighted imaging
• Apparent diffusion coefficient
• Rectal cancer
• Cancer stage
• Texture analysis
• case-control study

• Aapparent diffusion coefficient
• Diffusion-weighted imaging
• Magnetic resonance imaging
• Rectal cancer

• Chemoradiotherapy
• Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging
• Humans
• Neoadjuvant Therapy
• Rectal Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging
• Rectal Neoplasms/therapy
• Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A

• Postoperative radio-chemotherapy
• Rectal cancer
• Total mesorectal excision