To investigate the effect of capsular tension ring (CTR) implantation on postoperative rotational stability and visual performance of a plate-haptic multifocal toric intraocular lens in highly and non-highly myopic eyes.

Consecutive cataract patients intended for phacoemulsification and plate-haptic multifocal toric IOL (AT LISA 909 M) implantation were enrolled and randomized to receive either co-implantation of a CTR or not. Axial length (AL) ≥ 26 mm was defined as highly myopic (HM) eyes. At 3 months postoperatively, IOL rotation degree, residual astigmatism, visual acuity, higher-order aberrations, modulation transfer function, dysfunctional lens index (DLI), and quality of vision index (QVI) were assessed.

This prospective cohort study included 44 eyes with CTR implanted and 43 without. In HM eyes, the CTR group showed significantly smaller degree of IOL rotation and less residual astigmatism compared to the non-CTR group, however, no such differences were found in non-HM eyes (both p > 0.05). Furthermore, in HM eyes, despite no difference in visual acuity, the CTR group exhibited significantly lower spherical aberrations and higher DLI and QVI compared to the non-CTR group (all p < 0.05), although no such differences were observed in non-HM eyes (all p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis identified longer AL, larger white-to-white, and non-use of CTR as independent risk factors for greater IOL rotation.

The co-implantation of CTR improves the rotational stability of a multifocal toric IOL in HM eyes, hence subsequently enhancing visual quality.

Cataracts pose a significant clinical burden due to their complex pathogenesis. In recent years, an increase in cataracts coexisting with myopia has heightened the incidence of retinopathy and posterior vitreous detachment. Additionally, symptoms of ocular axis elongation, lens nucleus hardening, and vitreous liquefaction have become more prevalent. While conventional extracapsular cataract extraction is commonly employed, it often yields suboptimal visual outcomes. Subsequent advancements in cataract phacoemulsification and lens implantation surgeries have gained widespread acceptance for their ability to improve refraction and significantly improve uncorrected visual acuity.

To investigate the effect of capsular treatment after phacoemulsification lens implantation in myopic patients with cataract.

We selected 110 patients (with 134 eyes) with myopia and cataracts treated. These patients were categorized into two groups: an observation group (57 patients with 70 eyes) and a control group (53 patients with 64 eyes). The control group underwent cataract phacoemulsification and lens implantation, while the observation group received a refined capsular treatment based on the control group's procedure. We assessed the differences in visual acuity and quality between the two groups before and after surgery.

At six months post-operation, the observation group exhibited significantly improved far vision, intermediate vision, near vision, lower objective scattering index, higher Modulation transfer function cut-off frequency, and overall vision metrics at different contrast levels (100%, 20% and 9%) compared to the control group (P < 0.05). The total score of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire in the observation group at 6 months after operation was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05). No significant difference in the incidence of adverse reactions was observed between the observation group and control group (P > 0.05).

Capsular treatment demonstrates efficacy in improving visual acuity and quality after phacoemulsification lens implantation in myopic patients with cataracts, warranting its clinical application.

Toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) have been developed to enhance visual acuity impaired by cataracts and correct corneal astigmatism. However, residual astigmatism caused by postoperative rotation of the toric IOL is an important factor affecting visual quality after implantation. To decrease the rotation of the toric IOL, significant advancements have been made in understanding the characteristics of toric IOL rotation, the factors influencing its postoperative rotation, as well as the development of various measurement techniques and interventions to address this issue. It has been established that factors such as the patient's preoperative refractive status, biological parameters, surgical techniques, postoperative care, and long-term management significantly impact the rotational stability of the toric IOL. Clinicians should adopt a personalized approach that considers these factors to minimize the risk of toric IOL rotation and ensure optimal outcomes for each patient. This article reviews the influence of various factors on toric IOL rotational stability. It discusses new challenges that may be encountered to reduce and intervene with rotation after toric IOL implantation in the foreseeable future.

To compare the effect of implanting the capsular tension ring (CTR) before or after a toric intraocular lens (IOL) on rotational stability in patients with cataract and astigmatism.

This is a randomized retrospective study. Patients who underwent phacoemulsification combined with toric IOL implantation due to cataract and astigmatism between February 2018 and October 2019 were enrolled in the study. Group 1 consisted of 53 eyes of 53 patients in whom the CTR was placed into the capsular bag after the implantation of the toric IOL. On the other hand, group 2 consisted of 55 eyes of 55 patients in whom the CTR was placed into the capsular bag before implantation of the toric IOL. The two groups were compared in terms of preoperative and postoperative astigmatism, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and postoperative IOL rotation degree.

There were no significant differences between the two groups related to age and sex (p > 0.05) or the mean preoperative spherical value, UCVA, BCVA, and corneal astigmatism (p > 0.05). Although the mean postoperative residual astigmatism of the first group (- 0.29 ± 0.26) was lower than that of the second (- 0.43 ± 0.31), the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.16). The mean degree of rotation was 0.75 ± 2.66° in group 1 and 2.90 ± 6.57° in group 2, which was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.02).

The implantation of CTR after a toric IOL provides further rotational stability and more effective astigmatic correction.

To evaluate the efficacy of the toric intraocular lens (IOL) and capsular tension ring (CTR) suturing technique in eyes with long axial length (AL) with a high risk of toric IOL rotation.

This is a retrospective observational case series. The data files of patients who underwent a one-piece acrylic toric IOL (Tecnis Toric IOL and Acrysof IQ Toric IOL) implantation with the toric IOL and CTR suturing technique for cataract and astigmatism or toric IOL repositioning were analyzed. Inclusion criteria were a regular total corneal astigmatism of ≥ 1.5 D and an AL of ≥ 26.0 mm. Preoperative and postoperative astigmatism, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), IOL rotation, intraoperative, and postoperative complications were evaluated.

A total of 30 eyes of 29 patients were included in this study. The mean AL was 27.82 ± 1.53 mm (range, 26.08-31.07). UDVA revealed a statistically significant improvement from 0.84 ± 0.20 logMAR preoperatively to 0.04 ± 0.06 logMAR postoperatively (p < 0.001). The mean preoperative corneal astigmatism was 3.08 ± 1.01 D reduced to the postoperative residual astigmatism of 0.59 ± 0.32 D which was found also statistically significant (p < 0.001). Only 2 eyes (6.2%) had postoperative toric IOL rotation of 5° and 10°, respectively. The mean degree of postoperative rotation was 0.50 ± 2.01.

This technique provided excellent rotational stability even in eyes with longer AL and did not require additional intervention.

To assess the contribution of capsular tension ring (CTR) to postoperative stability and visual outcomes of a plate-haptic toric intraocular lens (IOL).

This prospective cohort study was performed among patients underwent toric IOL (AT TORBI 709 M) implantation with or without CTR at the Eye and ENT hospital between April 2020 and November 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance baseline factors. Postoperatively, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCVA) and residual astigmatism, as well as IOLs' rotation, tilt, and decentration, were analyzed. Grouped multiple linear regression analysis was used to model predictive factors of rotation in each group. Additionally, a meta-analysis of data from 4 publications (284 eyes) and current study was performed to evaluate the effect of CTR co-implantation on toric IOL rotation.

After PSM, 126 eyes from each group were included for further analysis. Postoperatively, UDVA was 0.31 ± 0.38 logMAR and 0.27 ± 0.36 logMAR in the CTR and NCTR groups, respectively (P = 0.441), and residual astigmatism was 0.75 ± 0.52 D and 0.86 ± 0.65 D, respectively (P = 0.139). The rotation of toric IOL was significantly smaller in the CTR group than in the NCTR group (4.63 ± 6.27 vs. 10.93 ± 16.05 degrees, P < 0.001). The regression models of the two groups and the coefficients of LT were significantly different (P < 0.001 and P = 0.001, respectively). Furthermore, the meta-analysis confirmed that CTR co-implantation reduced toric IOL rotation (MD, - 1.59; 95% CI, - 3.10 to - 0.09; P = 0.038).

CTR enhances rotational stability of toric IOL by reducing the impact of LT, and CTR co-implantation is recommended in patients with lens thickness (LT) ≥ 4.5 mm, white-to-white (WTW) ≥ 11.6 mm, or high preexisting astigmatism.