Tafasitamab is a novel humanized anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, designed for the treatment of B-cell malignancies. Our study aims to enhance the direct, non-immune-mediated, activity of tafasitamab (TAFA) with the combination of metronomic chemotherapy (mCHEMO), including vinorelbine (mVNR) and etoposide (mETO), in preclinical models of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). In vitro, the 144 h exposure of thrice-weekly mVNR, daily mETO, and single-dose TAFA significantly inhibited the viability of human CD19+ DLBCL cell lines (i.e., Toledo, OCI-LY3, and SU-DHL10) in a concentration-dependent manner. In all cell lines, the concomitant treatment with TAFA and mVNR or mETO showed a marked synergism, except for TAFA + mETO on SU-DHL10 cells. The TAFA + mCHEMO treatments promoted apoptosis, and the TAFA + mVNR combination significantly inhibited, already after 24 h, the phosphorylation of GSK3α/β, mTOR, p70S6K, RPS6, and TSC2 proteins in DLBCL cells. TAFA significantly increased the VNR and ETO intracellular concentrations in all DLBCL cells after 24 h, except for ETO levels in SU-DHL10. The TAFA + mCHEMO treatment strongly reduced the ABCB1, ABCG2, and c-MYC gene expression in SU-DHL10 cells. In vivo, the TAFA + mVNR combination was well tolerated, significantly reduced the volumes of subcutaneous DLBCL masses, and increased the overall survival of mice affected by systemic DLBCL. We report additional mechanisms to enhance the direct activity of TAFA with mCHEMO synergistically in DLBCL cells in vitro and in vivo, suggesting the use of this combination schedule into future clinical trials.

In the phase I Epi-RCHOP study (NCT02889523), we reported that R-CHOP-tazemetostat was well tolerated with the recommended phase II dose, consistent with monotherapy.

Phase II included newly diagnosed diffuse large B cell lymphoma patients aged 60-80 years who received six cycles of rituximab-CHOP (R-CHOP) with continuous tazemetostat (800 mg BID), plus two cycles of tazemetostat and rituximab (cycles 7 and 8), from July 31, 2020 to July 18, 2022. Primary endpoint was positron emission tomography complete metabolic response (CMR). Sample size was calculated with H0 of 70% and H1 assumption of 80%.

The trial enrolled 122 patients: median age 70 (60-80), 90.2% with stage III-IV, and 73.8% with International Prognostic Index 3-5. Overall, 100 patients (82%) received eight cycles, while 22 had premature treatment discontinuation (PTD), including 12 during the first two cycles. Reasons for PTD were consent withdrawal (N = 10), adverse events (N = 6), death (N = 2), protocol deviation (N = 2), progressive disease (N = 1), and physician decision (N = 1). The median percentage of relative dose intensity of tazemetostat and R-CHOP exceeded 90%, but required a protocol amendment and reduction in vincristine dosage at 1 mg full dose. At the end of treatment or PTD, 92/122 patients (75.4%) achieved CMR, eight (6.6%) partial metabolic response, five (4.1%) progressive disease, two (1.6%) died (septic shock), and 15 (12.3%) were not evaluated. Sensitivity analysis, excluding ten non-evaluated patients who withdrew consent, showed CMR in 82.1%. After a median follow-up of 18.5 months (IQR: 15.4-21), estimated progression-free and overall survival at 18 months were 77.7% (95% CI: 67.5-85.1%) and 88.8% (95% CI: 79.9-93.9%), respectively.

R-CHOP plus tazemetostat is feasible with a promising CMR in elderly DLBCL patients. Complementary biomarker studies are needed for a more personalized approach.

This study was sponsored under a grant from Ipsen.

Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer treatment, primary resistance and acquired resistance continue to limit their efficacy for many patients. To address resistance and enhance the anti-tumor activity within the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), numerous therapeutic strategies targeting both innate and adaptive immune cells have emerged. These include combination therapies with ICIs, chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T), chimeric antigen receptor macrophages (CAR-Ms) or chimeric antigen receptor natural killer cell (CAR-NK) therapy, colony stimulating factor 1 receptor (CSF1R) inhibitors, dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists, cytokine therapies, and chemokine inhibition. These approaches underscore the significant potential of the TIME in cancer treatment. This article provides a comprehensive and up-to-date review of the mechanisms of action of various innate and adaptive immune cells within the TIME, as well as the therapeutic strategies targeting each immune cell type, aiming to deepen the understanding of their therapeutic potential.

In this contribution to the Orations - New Horizons of the Journal of Controlled Release, I present a personal perspective on the complexities of cancer nanomedicine and the approaches to master them. This oration draws mainly from my lab's journey to explore three transformative approaches to master complexities in the field: (1) leveraging text mining to construct dynamic knowledge bases for hypothesis generation in cell-specific drug delivery, (2) introducing the concept of meta-synergy to further optimize and classify multi-drug combinations across dimensions such as chemical loading, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics (3) utilizing automation to accelerate nanoparticle discovery with advanced screening methodologies such as aggregation-induced emission (AIE). I argue that by embracing complexity in nanomedicine, we can manifest new therapeutic possibilities, paving the way for more effective, precise, and adaptive treatment strategies.

Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and follicular lymphoma (FL) represent the two major subtypes of mature B cell lymphoma. A deeper understanding of tumor biology, as well as molecular classification characterized by targetable gene alterations, and the introduction of novel treatment options, including targeted drugs (e.g., antibody-drug conjugates and small molecules [e.g., Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor]) and immune therapies (e.g., chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T cell therapy and bispecific antibody [BsAb]), has changed the treatment paradigms for DLBCL and FL. In clinical practice, however, treatment regimens are determined mainly based on prior treatment history, duration of response after previous treatment, patient age, and patient frailty because there have been few randomized trials to inform treatment selection for patients with relapsed or refractory disease and because there is no single prognostic index that guides suitable treatment for each patient. In this review, we summarize the treatment options for DLBCL and FL and discuss the treatment strategies for these two subtypes. We also discuss future perspectives for the treatment of these subtypes.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common type of lymphoma in adults, which characterized by a high degree of heterogeneity in terms of clinical presentation, molecular phenotype, and genetic features. However, approximately 30 %-40 % of patients are refractory to standard chemotherapy, and their prognosis is poor. The emergence of small-molecule inhibitors, such as Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), has greatly improved the treatment of DLBCL; however, drug resistance associated with small-molecule inhibitors has greatly limited their clinical application. In this study, we elucidated the principal genes influencing BTKi sensitivity in DLBCL and delineated the underlying mechanisms. This study identified cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) as the central gene influencing BTKi sensitivity in DLBCL cells. The application of RO-3306 effectively promoted the growth and increased the apoptotic rate of DLBCL cells. Furthermore, RO-3306 increased the susceptibility of DLBCL cells to BTKis in both in vitro and xenograft experimental models. RNA-seq analyses suggested the potential modulation of the JAK2/STAT3 signaling cascade by RO-3306, a finding further confirmed by the diminished phosphorylation documented by western blotting. This study provides pivotal insights into the mechanisms governing BTKi sensitivity in DLBCL and potentially reveals new avenues for targeted therapeutic strategies.

Rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone (R-CHOP) therapy is the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, detailed delineation of toxicity data is limited and has not been examined by age. We sought to examine adverse event data in patients receiving R-CHOP from the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 50303 trial to determine if there were differences in grade 3+ toxicities by age cohort or ECOG performance status (PS), and if outcome was impacted by age cohort or toxicity occurrence.

CALGB 50303 was an intergroup phase III study for previously untreated patients with DLBCL that included R-CHOP as one of the trial arms. In the subset of 235 evaluable, seemingly fit patients receiving R-CHOP on this trial, data regarding the occurrence of grade 3+ hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities by treatment arm, as well as completion of protocol therapy, overall response rate (ORR), and survival outcome parameters were collected and analyzed for Alliance A151930.

Data were available for further analysis from 235 of 243 patients evaluable for safety, i.e., those who received R-CHOP therapy on this trial, with 165 being <65 years of age, and 70 ≥ 65 years of age. There was an increased rate of grade 3+ non-hematologic (but not hematologic) toxicities in the older age cohorts, after controlling for disease stage and performance status (p < 0.001). One-year and three-year overall survival (OS) were inferior in patients ≥65 years of age, compared to those <65 years of age; there was no difference in one-year or in three-year progression-free survival (PFS) between the age cohorts.

Standard frontline therapy with R-CHOP can be effectively administered to an older age cohort. We found more grade 3+ non-hematologic, but not hematologic, toxicities in older patients. These data can be used in clinical trial and real-world settings to identify at-risk DLBCL subgroups for which pro-active measures can be utilized to ensure completion of therapy and optimization of clinical outcomes.

gov Identifier: NCT00118209 (CALGB 50303).

Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) have shown prominent clinical efficacy in patients with B cell malignancies, such as chronic lymphocytic leukemia, mantle cell lymphoma, diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and Waldenström's macroglobulinemia. Nevertheless, numerous factors contribute to BTKi resistance, encompassing genetic mutations, chromosomal aberrations, dysregulation of protein expression, tumor microenvironment, and metabolic reprogramming. Accordingly, potential therapeutic strategies have been explored to surmount BTKi resistance, including noncovalent BTKi, BTK proteolysis-targeting chimeras, and combination therapies. Herein, we summarize the mechanisms responsible for BTKi resistance as well as the current preclinical and clinical strategies to address BTKi resistance in B cell malignancies treatment.

Objective: To explore the efficacy and safety of orelabrutinib combined with R-CHOP in patients with high-risk nongerminal center B-cell (non-GCB) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with extranodal involvement. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted on 35 patients who were seen at Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital and were immunohistochemically confirmed to have non-GCB DLBCL, had an International Prognostic Index score of 3 - 5, and confirmed to have ≥2 extranodal involvement on PET/CT. The treatment comprised the standard R-CHOP regimen combined with oral orelabrutinib (150 mg/day) for six cycles. In patients who developed neutropenia or grade 3 neutropenia with fever during treatment, administration of prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 48 h after the end of chemotherapy was started on the next cycle. The endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS) time, overall survival (OS) time, and safety assessment. Results: The 35 eligible patients enrolled had a median age of 53 years (21 - 72 years) and a median follow-up time of 28 months (12 - 36 months) ; 19 patients had double-expressor (DE) status. The ORR was 88.6%, and the CR rate was 68.6%. The 2-year PFS and OS rates were 68.6% (95% CI 54.0% - 7.2%) and 87.5% (95% CI 76.7% - 100%), respectively. The 2-year PFS rate was significantly lower in patients with DE status than in those without DE status [54.4% (95% CI 35.4% - 84.2%) vs. 85.2% (95% CI 68.3% - 100%), P=0.048]. Serious adverse events included febrile neutropenia, pneumonia, and atrial flutter, but no treatment-related deaths. Conclusion: In patients with high-risk non-GCB DLBCL and extranodal involvement, the combination of orelabrutinib with R-CHOP regimen had good efficacy and manageable toxicity.

Disparate pathogenic mechanisms complicate precision-medicine efforts to treat diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), the most common lymphoma diagnosis. Though potentially curable with frontline combination chemoimmunotherapy, DLBCL carries persistently poor prognosis for those with relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) disease, despite recent advances in immunotherapy. Here, we build on recent findings implicating gain-of-function mutations in the BCL10 signaling protein as drivers of resistance to Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors. We show mutant BCL10-driven DLBCL is resistant to multiple additional drug classes, demonstrating urgency to derive mechanistically rooted strategies to overcome undruggable BCL10 mutants that stabilize BTK-independent signaling filaments upstream of NF-kB activation. BCL10 mutants promote a cytokine-reinforced positive feedback loop of lymphomagenesis driving not just NF-kB but multiple additional pathways converging on diffuse activation of oncogenic transcription factors. Up-regulation of anti-apoptotic genes increases mitochondrial membrane potential, underlying multidrug resistance. Increased expression of BCL2, BCL2L1 (BCL-XL), and BCL2A1 (BFL1) drives resistance to venetoclax, but expression can be overcome by the potent non-covalent BTK inhibitor pirtobrutinib. Venetoclax plus pirtobrutinib synergized in overcoming resistance and potently killed BCL10-mutant lymphomas in vitro and in vivo. BTK therefore retains key roles protecting DLBCL from apoptosis even when downstream activation of the BCL10 signaling complex activates NF-kB independently.

Vincristine (VCR) can cause vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) during the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and the mechanisms are complicated. The aim of this study was to investigate the influencing factors on the population pharmacokinetics (PopPK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) related to VIPN, including clearance routes, drug-drug interactions (DDI), and genetic characteristics. Pediatric patients being treated for ALL were recruited to PK study where VCR and its metabolite (M1) were measured using a novel assay. The incidence of VIPN was also recorded. DNA sequencing of relevant PK and PD genes was performed. PopPK and PK/PD models were developed, pharmacogenetic and DDI analyses were conducted. In total, 79 children were recruited. The results showed that allometric scaling, ABCB1-rs1128503 genotype, and posaconazole (POS) significantly improved the PopPK model fit. VIPN was significantly correlated with the exposure of VCR. Co-administration with POS shifted the effect curve for VIPN to the left, indicating increased VIPN risk at the same exposure levels. No significant effects on VIPN were observed for CYP3A5 (rs776746), CYP3A4 (rs2242480), CEP72 (rs924607), or various ABCB1 variants (rs1128503, rs2032582, rs1045642, rs4728709, rs4148737, and rs10276036), nor with the co-administration of fluconazole or dasatinib. In summary, co-administration of POS increased VCR exposure by 0.4-fold and raised the risk of VIPN, with an occurrence probability generally exceeding 0.7. Therapeutic drug monitoring of VCR in clinical practice may be necessary to enable appropriate dose adjustments and individualized treatment.

In Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL), elevated anti-apoptotic BCL2-family proteins (e.g., MCL1, BCL2, BCLXL) and NF-κB subunits (RelA, RelB, cRel) confer poor prognosis. Heterogeneous expression, regulatory complexity, and redundancy offsetting the inhibition of individual proteins, complicate the assignment of targeted therapy. We combined flow cytometry "fingerprinting", immunofluorescence imaging, and computational modeling to identify therapeutic vulnerabilities in DLBCL. The combined workflow predicted selective responses to BCL2 inhibition (venetoclax) and non-canonical NF-κB inhibition (Amgen16). Within the U2932 cell line we identified distinct resistance mechanisms to BCL2 inhibition in cellular sub-populations recapitulating intratumoral heterogeneity. Co-cultures with CD40L-expressing stromal cells, mimicking the tumor microenvironment (TME), induced resistance to BCL2 and BCLXL targeting BH3-mimetics via cell-type specific upregulation of BCLXL or MCL1. Computational models, validated experimentally, showed that basal NF-κB activation determined whether CD40 activation drove BH3-mimetic resistance through upregulation of RelB and BCLXL, or cRel and MCL1. High basal NF-κB activity could be overcome by inhibiting BTK to resensitize cells to BH3-mimetics in CD40L co-culture. Importantly, non-canonical NF-κB inhibition overcame heterogeneous compensatory BCL2 upregulation, restoring sensitivity to both BCL2- and BCLXL-targeting BH3-mimetics. Combined molecular fingerprinting and computational modelling provides a strategy for the precision use of BH3-mimetics and NF-κB inhibitors in DLBCL.

Cutaneous T-cell lymphomas (CTCLs) are a rare and heterogeneous subset of skin-localized, non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Our aim was to evaluate the in vitro antitumor activity of the multi-kinase inhibitor linifanib, either alone or in combination with metronomic vinorelbine (mVNR) or etoposide (mETO), on CTCL cells. In vitro proliferation assay and Luminex analysis showed that long-term, daily exposure of linifanib significantly inhibited the proliferation of the human CTCL cell line HH, in a concentration-dependent manner (IC50 = 48.4 ± 20.4 nM) and the phosphorylation of AKT/mTOR signaling pathway. The concomitant exposure of linifanib plus mVNR or mETO resulted in a strong synergism, with combination index values < 1. Linifanib significantly increased the VNR and ETO intracellular concentrations in HH cells, evaluated by UPLC-HRMS technology, and strongly reduced the ABCB1 and ABCG2 gene expression in HH. In conclusion, we reported a striking antitumor activity of daily, long-term linifanib and a clear synergistic effect when administered in combination with mCHEMO on CTCL cells, as a promising base for future clinical approaches in T-cell lymphomas.

CD5+ diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a rare subtype characterized by an inferior outcome. While dose-dense therapy shows promising activity, the optimal management remains to be determined. To evaluate the benefit of consolidative autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT), we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 47 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed de novo CD5+ DLBCL. Of 19 patients ≤ 70 of age with age-adjusted International Prognostic Index 2-3, eight underwent upfront ASCT, and nine did not, despite preserved organ function and response after induction therapy. The remaining two, ineligible for ASCT due to early progression or comorbidities, had a dismal clinical course. Among younger 17 high-risk patients eligible for ASCT, ASCT was associated with better overall (p = 0.0327) and progression-free survival (p = 0.0184). Younger patients without ASCT demonstrated similar outcomes to older patients with similar risk profiles. ASCT could be considered for high-risk CD5+ DLBCL with a response after induction therapy.

A key challenge in cancer research is to identify the secreted factors that contribute to tumor cell survival. Nowhere is this more evident than in Hodgkin lymphoma, where malignant Hodgkin Reed Sternberg (HRS) cells comprise only 1-5% of the tumor mass, the remainder being infiltrating immune cells that presumably are required for the survival of the HRS cells. Until now, there has been no way to characterize the complex Hodgkin lymphoma tumor microenvironment at genome scale. Here, we performed genome-wide transcriptional profiling with spatial and single-cell resolution. We show that the neighborhood surrounding HRS cells forms a distinct niche involving 31 immune and stromal cell types and is enriched in CD4+ T cells, myeloid and follicular dendritic cells, while being depleted of plasma cells. Moreover, we used machine learning to nominate ligand-receptor pairs enriched in the HRS cell niche. Specifically, we identified IL13 as a candidate survival factor. In support of this hypothesis, recombinant IL13 augmented the proliferation of HRS cells in vitro. In addition, genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 loss-of-function studies across more than 1,000 human cancer cell lines showed that IL4R and IL13RA1, the heterodimeric partners that constitute the IL13 receptor, were uniquely required for the survival of HRS cells. Moreover, monoclonal antibodies targeting either IL4R or IL13R phenocopied the genetic loss of function studies. IL13-targeting antibodies are already FDA-approved for atopic dermatitis, suggesting that clinical trials testing such agents should be explored in patients with Hodgkin lymphoma.

The primary objectives of this trial were aimed at exploring the pharmacokinetic profiles and the human bioequivalence of an intravenous liposomal injection of doxorubicin hydrochloride in comparison with a reference formulation in Chinese patients diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer.

To achieve these goals, the trial employed a randomized, open-label, two-formulation crossover dosing strategy among Chinese patients with metastatic breast cancer. Pharmacokinetic (PK) evaluation was conducted through the collection of blood samples, and the liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) method was leveraged to quantify plasma concentrations of both liposome-encapsulated doxorubicin and non-encapsulated doxorubicin in patients. Throughout the trial, all adverse events observed in the patients were meticulously assessed.

The results indicated that the maximum concentration (Cmax), AUC from time zero to the last measurable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-∞) of in vivo non-encapsulated doxorubicin after administration of both formulations fell within the 80.00%-125.00% range at a 90% confidence interval.

These findings strongly indicated that the tested formulations were bioequivalent to the reference formulation. The results also demonstrated that both formulations were well-tolerated, further establishing their safety profile in the context of metastatic breast cancer treatment.

Chinadrugtrials.org.cn Identifier: CTR20200878.

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of polatuzumab vedotin-rituximab-cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (pola-R-CHP) in CD20-positive patients with previously untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) in China.

A Markov model was constructed to analyse the cost-effectiveness of two strategies in CD20-positive patients with previously untreated DLBCL over a lifetime horizon: (1) pola-R-CHP and (2) rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP). The clinical outcomes were obtained from the POLARIX(NCT03274492), SCHOLAR-1, ZUMA-7(NCT03391466) and TRANSFORM(NCT03575351) trials. Costs were derived from the Chinese official websites and published literature, and utility values were obtained from the published literature. The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set at triple the 2023 Chinese per capita gross domestic product of US$38 042.49/quality-adjusted life year (QALY). Uncertainty was addressed using sensitivity analyses. The scenario analyses were also conducted.

Chinese healthcare system perspective.

A hypothetical cohort of adult patients presenting with CD20-positive, patients with previously untreated DLBCL.

Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP.

The main outcomes of the study were QALYs, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) and incremental net-health benefit (INHB).

In China, the ICER and INHB of pola-R-CHP compared with R-CHOP were US$77 036.33/QALY and -1.11 QALYs, respectively. The ICER was above the WTP threshold. Outcomes were most responsive to the price of pola. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses indicated that pola-R-CHP had a low probability of being cost-effective under the current WTP threshold. The scenario analyses demonstrated that when the price of pola fell by more than 32.5% to less than US$33.19/mg, the economic probability of pola-R-CHP was greater than 50% in previously untreated CD20-positive patients with DLBCL in China.

Pola-R-CHP is not cost-effective in the first-line treatment for previously untreated CD20-positive DLBCL in China. A value-based price for the cost of pola is less than US$33.19/mg.

With the introduction of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell (CAR T) therapies, bispecific CD3/CD20 antibodies and anti-CD19 antibodies, immunotherapy continues to transform the treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A number of novel immunotherapeutic strategies are under investigation to build upon current clinical benefit and offer further options to those patients who cannot tolerate conventional intensive therapies due to their age and/or state of health. Alongside immunotherapies that leverage the adaptive immune response, natural killer (NK) cell and myeloid cell-engaging therapies can utilize the innate immune system. Monoclonal antibodies engineered for greater recognition by the patient's immune system can enhance antitumor cytotoxic mechanisms mediated by NK cells and macrophages. In addition, CAR technology is extending into NK cells and macrophages and investigational immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting macrophage/myeloid cell checkpoints via the CD47/SIRPα axis are in development. Regimens that engage both innate and adaptive immune responses may help to overcome resistance to current immunotherapies. Furthermore, combinations of immunotherapy and oncogenic pathway inhibitors to reprogram the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment of DLBCL may also potentiate antitumor responses. As immunotherapy treatment options continue to expand, both in the first-line setting and further lines of therapy, understanding how to harness these immunotherapies and the potential for combination approaches will be important for the development of future DLBCL treatment approaches.

The cell of origin (COO) classification is an expression-based tumor algorithm identifying molecular subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with distinct prognostic characteristics. Traditional immunohistochemical methods for classifying COO subtypes have poor concordance and limited prognostic value in frontline DLBCL. In contrast, RNA-based metrics like the NanoString Lymphoma Subtyping Test (LST) define more robust subtypes with validated prognostic associations. This study introduces gneSeqCOO, an algorithm using bulk RNA Sequencing (RNASeq) profiles of individual tumor biopsies for COO classification based on a fixed reference. This method produced consistent per-sample results and was robust to variation in RNA quality and sequencing bias. Validation in >1000 DLBCL samples showed high concordance with the NanoString LST assay, even in cohorts containing only one COO subtype. gneSeqCOO presents a robust and versatile alternative to existing assays, potentially reducing the need for additional samples where RNASeq was already generated. The package is available at https://github.com/Genentech/gneSeqCOO.

At least 25% to 35% of patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) are not cured with frontline treatment, with generally poor subsequent outcomes. This motivates ongoing and intense interest in improving the frontline treatment of this disease. R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) has remained the standard of care for 20 years despite dozens of trials aiming to improve upon this regimen, and only recently has a novel regimen (pola-R-CHP [polatuzumab vedotin, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone]) challenged its supremacy. Fortunately, at least 15 promising randomized trials evaluating new treatments in frontline LBCL treatment are underway. They differ not only in the therapy evaluated in the experimental arm, but in the choice of control arm, primary end point, and patient selection strategy, with some targeting specific biologic subtypes, some focusing on specific high-risk patient populations, and others enrolling older or frail patients. Novel response-adapted strategies leveraging circulating tumor DNA are also underway. Although this variety of approaches provides a welcome increase in the overall likelihood of success, it will also present challenges if several of these trials are successful and we must choose among multiple potential treatment options that were not all tested in the same fashion. In this review, we summarize the main ongoing frontline randomized trials and discuss some of the questions that we will face in interpreting and applying their results in clinical practice in the next few years.

Next Generation Sequencing-based subtyping and interim- and end of treatment positron emission tomography (i/eot-PET) monitoring have high potential for upfront and on-treatment risk assessment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients. We performed Dana Farber Cancer Institute (DFCI) and LymphGen genetic subtyping for the HOVON84 (n = 208, EudraCT-2006-005174-42) and PETAL (n = 204, EudraCT-2006-001641-33) trials retrospectively combined with DFCI genetic data (n = 304). For all R-CHOP treated patients (n = 592), C5/MCD- and C2/A53-subtypes show significantly worse outcome independent of the international prognostic index. For all subtypes, adverse prognostic value of i/eot-PET-positive status is confirmed. Consistent with frequent primary refractory disease, only 67% C2 patients become eot-PET-negative versus 81-88% for other subtypes. Indicative of high relapse rates, outcome of C5 i/eot-PET-negative patients remains significantly worse in HOVON-84, which trend validates in the PETAL and SAKK38-07 trials (NCT00544219). These results show the added value of integrated genetic subtyping and PET monitoring for prognostic stratification and subtype-specific trial design.

Polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHP (Pola-R-CHP) is approved as a new standard first-line therapy for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) based on the POLARIX trial. However, real-world data on its efficacy and safety in unselected patients is lacking. We conducted a retrospective cohort study to evaluate Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP outcomes in routine clinical practice in China. This is a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study and included all consecutive patients that received at least one dose of polatuzumab vedotin up until February 2024. A total of 600 eligible patients from 6 centers were identified, 131 receiving Pola-R-CHP and 469 R-CHOP. After 1:2 propensity score matching, 128 pairs were obtained for further survival and prognosis analysis. With a median follow-up of 12.8 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) was numerically higher with Pola-R-CHP versus R-CHOP (90.3% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.18). Benefits were consistently observed across molecular subgroups, especially advanced stage, ECOG ≥ 2, extranodal involvement ≥ 2 and non-GCB group. The complete response rate of the Pola-R-CHP group was higher than that of the RCHOP group (86.8% vs. 79.7%; p = 0.09), but there was no statistical difference. Safety profiles were comparable, with no new concerns. Among 128 patients treated with Pola-R-CHP, 96 underwent gene sequencing analysis: MCD (25.0%), EZB (13.5%), combined subtype (12.5%), ST2 (9.4%), and other/unclassifiable subtype (30.2%). The most common mutations (> 25% of cases) were PIM1, TP53, BCL-6, KMT2D, SOCS1, BCL-2. Genetic testing results show the correlation between genotyping, gene mutations in PIM1/TP53 and therapeutic efficacy. This large real-world study supports Pola-R-CHP as an effective frontline option for DLBCL, with sustained efficacy versus R-CHOP observed in unselected populations. While 12-month PFS failed to reach statistical significance, subgroup analyses favor Pola-R-CHP. Further research with a wider population, longer follow-up, and screening of advantageous groups are warranted.

Intravascular large B-cell lymphoma (IVLBCL) is a rare type of extranodal large B-cell lymphoma that is characterized by the proliferation of lymphoma cells in the lumina of small vessels. Recent progress uncovering the genetic characteristics associated with MYD88/CD79B mutations has stimulated interest in the use of drugs targeting B-cell receptor signaling, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase. However, difficulties in culturing ex vivo IVLBCL cells has hampered research on the development of novel therapies. In the present study, we demonstrated the establishment of an ex vivo culture system of IVLBCL cells obtained from patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. The spheroid culture enabled us to culture IVLBCL PDX cells for more than 10 days and to explore the efficacy of drug treatments acting on these cells. We found that carfilzomib and ibrutinib were effective for treating IVLBCL in ex vivo experiments and conducted in vivo analyses to assess the efficacy of these drugs. Although the efficacy of carfilzomib was difficult to confirm due to its toxicity in our models, ibrutinib showed comparable efficacy to a standard combination of chemotherapy drugs. Together, our data provide a new culture method for IVLBCL PDX cells and a rationale for translating ibrutinib to clinical use in IVLBCL patients.

Double-expressor lymphoma (DEL) has a poorer prognosis than other subtypes of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). This study is a multicenter, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 clinical study initiated by investigators to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined zanubrutinib with R-CHOP, which includes rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone for patients with DEL (stage II or more), as well as to explore factors related to efficacy preliminarily.

From November 2020 to July 2022, 48 newly diagnosed patients were enrolled. All patients received twice-daily oral zanubrutinib (160 mg) for 6 months and standardized R-CHOP regimen for six to eight cycles.

The objective response rate (ORR) was 89.6%, with a complete response rate (CRR) of 83.3%. The median follow-up was 29.3 months. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached. The PFS and OS were 81.25% and 93.75% at 2 years, respectively. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23 of 48 (47.9%) patients. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) results of 33 patients showed that TP53, MYD88, and PIM1 were the most common mutated gene. Multivariate analysis revealed that BCL-6 gene rearrangement was an adverse prognostic factor for both PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.247; 95% confidence article [CI], 0.068-0.9; p = .034) and OS (HR, 0.057; 95% CI, 0.006-0.591; p = .016), whereas the number of extranodal involvements also significantly influenced OS (HR, 15.12; 95% CI, 1.07-213.65; p = .044).

Zanubrutinib in combination with R-CHOP is an effective option for DEL patients, and the toxicity of zanubrutinib is entirely acceptable for patients.

One-third of the patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) experience relapse despite receiving standard R-CHOP chemotherapy. We aimed to elucidate the clinical course and prognosis in older patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) DLBCL in a single-center experience in Japan. We conducted a retrospective survey of 52 older patients with R/R DLBCL (aged >65 years at diagnosis; 54% men) who received R-CHOP chemotherapy, to assess their clinical course and prognosis. The median progression-free survival was 8.5 months. Seventeen patients had central nervous system (CNS) relapse, with 11 receiving high-dose methotrexate or whole-brain irradiation. Briefly, 30 patients underwent salvage chemotherapy, whereas 11 received palliative care only. Overall survival (OS) from initial treatment and progression were 20.8 and 7.8 months, respectively. Patients with disease progression within 12 months from initial treatment had a significantly poorer OS than those with disease progression over 12 months, while CNS relapse did not affect OS. Among the 41 reported deaths, 40 were due to lymphoma. As the prognosis in older patients with R/R DLBCL is poor even after salvage chemotherapy, improved initial treatment strategies to reduce the risk of progression and more effective and feasible treatments after progression are warranted.

Recent front-line clinical trials used the International Prognostic Index (IPI) to identify trial-eligible patients with newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). However, many IPI-like variants with improved accuracy have been developed over the years for rituximab-treated patients.

We assessed the impact of International Prognostic Indices on patient enrolment in clinical trials, aiming to exclude low-risk IPI patients based on POLARIX/EPCORE DLBCL-2 trial criteria.

We identified 2877 patients in the Danish Lymphoma Registry who would have been eligible for the POLARIX trial if patients with IPI 0-1 scores were included. IPI and NCCN-IPI assigned 33.3% and 11.9% of patients to the low-risk group, respectively. Shorter 5-year overall survival (91.4% vs. 97.5%), higher relapse rate (9.9% vs. 4.4%), and more deaths (16.1% vs. 4.4%) occurred in the low-risk IPI group compared with low-risk NCCN-IPI group. Analyzed models failed to identify true high-risk patients with poor prognosis. Similar results were found in the confirmatory cohort developed based on EPCORE DLBCL-2 trial eligibility criteria.

True low-risk patients are more optimal identified by NCCN-IPI and should be excluded from front-line clinical trials due to their excellent prognosis. However, additional high-risk factors besides clinical prognostic models need to be considered when selecting trial-eligible patients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients that fail to achieve a complete metabolic response with frontline immunochemotherapy have a poor prognosis. Genomic profiling has led to a broader understanding of the molecular drivers in DLBCL, but it is unknown how well current classifiers identify patients that will experience primary treatment resistance (PTR). Using whole exome and RNA sequencing data from newly diagnosed DLBCL patients, we evaluated the genomic landscape of PTR and compared it to that of non-PTR DLBCL. We found a significant increase in the frequency of TP53 (34% vs. 15%, p = 0.005) and ARID1A mutations (21% vs. 7%, p = 0.007) in PTR cases, with pathway analysis further demonstrating a downregulation of TP53 and an increase in chromatin modifying pathways. These results suggest that TP53 and ARID1A may be key mediators of PTR and important pathways contributing to the poor outcomes. We found that the current molecular classifiers were unable to identify PTR cases at diagnosis. However, our newly identified high-risk signature identified 46% of PTR cases at diagnosis. Overall, these results contribute to our understanding of the genomic landscape of patients with primary treatment resistance.

This review aims to provide an overview of the latest developments in the classification and molecular understanding of aggressive B-cell lymphomas, specifically focusing on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL). Advances in molecular techniques have led to novel ways to classify these lymphomas based on clinical, histological, transcriptional, and genetic properties. While these methods have predominantly focused on the malignant compartment, recent studies emphasize the value of profiling the tumour microenvironment for a more comprehensive disease classification. Additionally, the integration of liquid biopsies represents a promising advancement, offering less invasive and dynamic insights into tumour characteristics and treatment response. Although molecular profiles are not yet routinely used to guide therapy, emerging data highlight their potential to predict responses to novel treatments. It is our belief that integrating molecular profiling and liquid biopsies into clinical practice and research now will pave the way for more personalized and effective therapies in the future.

Short diagnosis-to-treatment interval (DTI) is associated with high-risk disease and poor survival in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). There is a paucity of literature on DTI and survival in DLBCL treated with first-line DA-R-EPOCH. We hypothesized that rapid initiation of DA-R-EPOCH in aggressive and high-risk DLBCL mitigates the adverse prognostic implication of short DTI.

We retrospectively examined the association of DTI, categorically (short DTI ≤ 14 and long > 14 days) and continuously, with clinical features and survival outcomes in DLBCL treated with first-line DA-R-EPOCH at our institution.

A total 190 patients were analyzed, 21% with high-grade DLBCL subtypes, 56% IPI ≥ 3, and median DTI of 13 days. The short DTI cohort contained more patients with IPI ≥ 3, bulky disease, and elevated LDH. When analyzed categorically and continuously, DTI was not associated with significant differences in PFS or OS. There was significant multivariable interaction between bulky disease, DTI, and PFS (P = .033), with improved PFS in patients with bulky disease in the short DTI cohort.

We found that negative prognostic implications of DTI are mitigated in DLBCL patients treated with first-line DA-R-EPOCH, suggesting that urgent initiation of DA-R-EPOCH in high-risk DLBCL, including bulky disease, may improve survival. Our study's shorter DTI compared with DTIs reported in prospective DLBCL trials highlights DTI as a marker of external validity in clinical trial results. Future trials should implement protocols encouraging shorter, realistic DTIs to avoid selection bias against high-risk patients who are unable to delay treatment.

Double-expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DE-DLBCL) has a poor prognosis, and optimal treatment strategies remain unclear. This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of RCHOP, R2-CHOP (RCHOP plus lenalidomide), and RCHOP plus Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKi) in DE-DLBCL treatment.

Data from 213 DE-DLBCL patients treated from January 2019 and February 2024. Among them, 112 received R-CHOP, 65 received R2-CHOP, and 36 received R-CHOP plus BTKi. We evaluated clinical characteristics, overall response rate (ORR), complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs) for each groups.

Baseline characteristics were comparable across groups. ORRs were 95.5 % for R-CHOP, 96.9 % for R2-CHOP, and 97.2 % for R-CHOP plus BTKi, with CR rates of 76.5 %, 80 %, and 75 %, respectively. BTKi significantly improved PFS (p=0.033) but not affect OS (p=0.165). Lenalidomide showed no benefit in PFS (p=0.153) or OS (p=0.351). With median follow-up times of 20.6 months for R-CHOP, 23.5 months for R2-CHOP, and 17.6 months for R-CHOP plus BTKi, the 1-year PFS rates were 73.6 %, 82.2 %, and 93.3 %, and the 1-year OS rates were 96.2 %, 93.2 %, and 100 %, respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events included leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia, and thrombocytopenia, with no significant differences among groups.

The addition of BTK inhibitor enhances progression-free survival in DE-DLBCL, especially in advanced-stage patients, without introducing new severe adverse reactions. In contract, adding lenalidomide does not offer additional efficacy or survival benefits.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated preliminary efficacy in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). To compare the safety and efficacy of zanubrutinib plus rituximab and lenalidomide (ZR2) and R-CHOP-like for elderly patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL, we conducted this single-center prospective study. Patients were treated with 6 cycles of ZR2 or R-CHOP-like regimen for the first-line treatment. The primary endpoint was complete response ratio (CRR). The secondary outcome measures were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Between June 15, 2020, and March 11, 2023, 30 patients with ZR2 and 60 patients with R-CHOP-like were enrolled. There were no significant differences observed in CRR (P = 0.878), PFS (P = 0.555) and OS (P = 0.769) between ZR2 and R-CHOP-like group. While, patients in ZR2 group had the following features: significantly older (P = 0.002), more unfit (P < 0.001) and higher prognosis risk scores (P = 0.025). The incidence of grade ≥ 3 anemia (P = 0.008) and pneumonia (P = 0.001) was significantly lower in ZR2 group. Patients with germinal center B-cell-like subtype (GCB), large masses or TP53 mutations had a satisfactory remission rate in ZR2 group (57.1%, 77.8% and 60.0%, respectively). ZR2 and R-CHOP-like regimen had similar efficacy and survival. While, the safety profile for ZR2 was superior. GCB subtype, large masses and TP53 mutations may benefit from ZR2 regimen as well. Patients with EBV-positive and CARD11 mutations may need additional treatment rather than ZR2. Patients with gastrointestinal DLBCL have to be monitored closely by abdominal enhanced CT every cycle. Overall, ZR2 chemo-free regimen might be more appropriate for elderly DLBCL patients.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and high-grade B cell lymphoma (HGBL) comprise the majority of large B-cell lymphomas (LBCL), and approximately two-thirds of patients diagnosed with these LBCLs are cured following treatment with first-line immunochemotherapy. While the International Prognostic Index (IPI) score is a validated prognostic tool used for patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP), there is a growing body of evidence that suggests that LBCL tumor features, which can be detected by clinical laboratory testing, can predict patient survival following first-line immunochemotherapy.

Clinical laboratory testing may also allow for rational identification of targeted agents that can be added to first-line immunochemotherapy for high-risk, pathologically defined subsets of LBCL patients, and this approach may result in better survival outcomes for the entire LBCL patient population as compared with adding pathologically "agnostic" agents for those defined as high risk by IPI score.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) encompasses a diverse spectrum of aggressive B-cell lymphomas with remarkable genetic heterogeneity and myriad clinical presentations. Multiplatform genomic analyses of DLBCL have identified oncogenic drivers within genetic subtypes that allow for pathologic subclassification of tumors into discrete entities with shared immunophenotypic, genetic, and clinical features. Robust classification of lymphoid tumors establishes a foundation for precision medicine and enables the identification of novel therapeutic vulnerabilities within biologically homogeneous entities. Most cases of DLBCL involving the central nervous system (CNS), vitreous, and testis exhibit immunophenotypic features suggesting an activated B-cell (ABC) origin. Shared molecular features include frequent comutations of MYD88 (L265P) and CD79B and frequent genetic alterations promoting immune evasion, which are hallmarks of the MCD/C5/MYD88 genetic subtype of DLBCL. Clinically, these lymphomas primarily arise within anatomic sanctuary sites and have a predilection for remaining confined to extranodal sites and strong CNS tropism. Given the shared clinical and molecular features, the umbrella term primary large B-cell lymphoma of immune-privileged sites (IP-LBCL) was proposed. Other extranodal DLBCL involving the breast, adrenal glands, and skin are often ABC DLBCL but are more heterogeneous in their genomic profile and involve anatomic sites that are not considered immune privileged. In this review, we describe the overlapping clinical, pathologic, and molecular features of IP-LBCL and highlight important considerations for diagnosis, staging, and treatment. We also discuss potential therapeutic vulnerabilities of IP-LBCL including sensitivity to inhibitors of Bruton tyrosine kinase, immunomodulatory agents, and immunotherapy.

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), not otherwise specified, is the most common subtype of large B-cell lymphoma, with differences in prognosis reflecting heterogeneity in the pathological, molecular, and clinical features. Current treatment standard is based on multiagent chemotherapy, including anthracycline and monoclonal anti-CD20 antibody, which leads to cure in 60% of patients. Recent years have brought new insights into lymphoma biology and have helped refine the risk groups. The results of these studies inspired the design of new clinical trials with targeted therapies and response-adapted strategies and allowed to identify groups of patients potentially benefiting from new agents. This review summarizes recent progress in identifying high-risk patients with DLBCL using clinical and biological prognostic factors assessed at diagnosis and during treatment in the front-line setting, as well as new treatment strategies with the application of targeted agents and immunotherapy, including response-adapted strategies.