To retrospectively evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients treated with liver transplantation after neoadjuvant or induction transarterial chemoembolization using doxorubicin-eluting superabsorbent polymer microspheres and to assess risk factors associated with disease recurrence and death after transplantation.

Between January 2006 and April 2021, 286 patients underwent liver transplantation related to cirrhosis and early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Demographic, angiographic imaging, and clinical follow-up data were collected from patients' electronic medical records. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate disease-free survival. The prognostic effect of patient and disease characteristics on HCC recurrence was analyzed using logistic regression models.

Fifty-three out of 286 patients (19%) underwent neoadjuvant or induction chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting superabsorbent polymer microspheres as bridging (n = 36) or as downstaging (n = 17) treatment. Time between diagnosis and liver transplantation was 311 days (range:225-440). Post-transplant follow-up revealed HCC recurrence in n = 1 (3%) and n = 4 (23.5%) patients in the bridging and downstaging groups, respectively, and disease-free survival at 5 years of 86% and 65% (p < 0.05) in the bridging and downstaging groups, respectively. Prognostic factors for post-transplant HCC recurrence include number of HCC lesions (p = 0.0088) and total tumor size (p = 0.0188) at diagnosis, as well as number of lesions (p = 0.0181) and largest tumor size (p = 0.0179) at explant analysis.

Neoadjuvant or induction chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting superabsorbent polymer microspheres is associated with a low incidence of post-transplant HCC recurrence; number and total size of HCC lesions at diagnosis and at explant analysis are risk factors for post-transplant HCC recurrence.

Liver cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounting for approximately 90% of primary liver cancers. Advances in diagnostic and therapeutic tools, along with improved understanding of their application, are transforming patient treatment. Integrating these innovations into clinical practice presents challenges and necessitates guidance. These clinical practice guidelines offer updated advice for managing patients with HCC and provide a comprehensive review of pertinent data. Key updates from the 2018 EASL guidelines include personalised surveillance based on individual risk assessment and the use of new tools, standardisation of liver imaging procedures and diagnostic criteria, use of minimally invasive surgery in complex cases together with updates on the integrated role of liver transplantation, transitions between surgical, locoregional, and systemic therapies, the role of radiation therapies, and the use of combination immunotherapies at various stages of disease. Above all, there is an absolute need for a multiparametric assessment of individual risks and benefits, considering the patient's perspective, by a multidisciplinary team encompassing various specialties.

This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of 5-Fluorouracil (5-Fu) combined with conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) compared to 5-Fu combined with drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) using CalliSpheres for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) using propensity score weighting methods. This retrospective analysis included 131 patients with HCC treated with 5-Fu combined with cTACE (5-Fu-cTACE group, n = 65) or DEB-TACE (5-Fu-DEB-TACE group, n = 66) at the Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College from January 2019 to December 2022. Based on the baseline data and laboratory indicators, propensity score weighting was used to reduce confounding bias. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST) were used to evaluate clinical efficacy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were the disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs). PFS was assessed using Kaplan‒Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models. The ORRs at 1 month (M1) after treatment in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 5-Fu-cTACE group were 90.9% and 76.9%, respectively (P = 0.029), while at this time, the DCRs were 93.9% in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group and 90.8% in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (P = 0.494). At 3 months (M3) after treatment, the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a higher ORR (84.8% vs. 56.9%, P < 0.001) and DCR (84.8% vs. 72.3%, P = 0.08). The ORR at 6 months (M6) was also higher in the 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group than in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (72.7% vs. 50.8%, P = 0.01). The median PFS after treatment with 5-Fu-DEB-TACE was longer than that after treatment with 5-Fu-cTACE (11 months vs. 6 months) (P = 0.004). Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that 5-Fu-DEB-TACE (HR = 0.590, P = 0.044), Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) intermediate risk (HR = 2.470, P = 0.010), BCLC stage B (HR = 2.303, P = 0.036), BCLC stage C (HR = 3.354, P = 0.002) and ascitic fluid (HR = 2.004, P = 0.046) were independent predictors of PFS. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. The 5-Fu-DEB-TACE group had a greater incidence of abdominal pain (72.7% vs. 47.7%, P = 0.003). However, the incidence of postoperative elevated transaminase levels was higher in the 5-Fu-cTACE group (83.1% vs. 66.6%, P = 0.031). Subgroups analysis showed patients receiving 5-Fu-DEB-TACE have better PFS compared to those receiving 5-Fu-cTACE in the BCLC stage A group (P = 0.0093), BCLC stage B group (P = 0.0096), multifocal group (P = 0.0056), Child-Pugh stage A group (P<0.001), non- extrahepatic metastasis group (P = 0.022), non-vascular invasion group (P = 0.0093), and the group with a largest tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.0048). At M1, M3, and M6, patients with preserved liver function and in some cases of low tumor burden had higher Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) (P < 0.05). Compared with 5-Fu-cTACE, 5-Fu-DEB-TACE has superior therapeutic efficacy, prolongs PFS, and reduces hepatotoxicity. However, it is associated with an increased incidence of postoperative abdominal pain.

To compare the effectiveness of drug-eluting bead transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) with different particle sizes in bridging and downstaging in pretransplant hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Assess the recurrent and survival rates after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT).

Retrospective review of 580 patients who underwent TACE using DEB from August 2012 to June 2020 at Taiwan Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Pre- and post-TACE computed tomography scan images of the liver were reviewed, and treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria. Patients were divided by who met the criteria (n = 342) or beyond (n = 238) the University of California San Francisco criteria for successful bridging and downstaging rate evaluation. Each group was divided into subgroups according to DEB particle sizes (group A: <100μm, group B: 100-300 μm, group C: 300-500 μm, and group D: 500-700 μm) to compare objective response rate and post-LDLT survival rate.

Overall successful bridging and downstaging rate is 97.1% and 58.4%, respectively, in the group of patients who meet the criteria (n = 332) and are beyond (n = 139) the University of California San Francisco criteria. Group B (100-300 μm) had a higher successful bridging rate (99.5%, P = .003) and downstaging rate (63.8%, P = .443). This subgroup also demonstrated a higher objective response rate in single (93.2%, P = .038) tumors, multiple (83.3%, P = .001) tumors, and tumors with size less than 5 cm (93.9%, P = .005). There are no significant differences in post-LDLT overall survival rate between different particle sizes.

TACE with 100 to 300 μm DEB particles is associated with a better chance of bridging and downstaging hepatocellular carcinoma patients to LDLT.

Worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third most common cause of cancer-related death. The remarkable improvements in treating HCC achieved in the last years have increased the complexity of its management. Following the need to have updated guidelines on the multidisciplinary treatment management of HCC, the Italian Scientific Societies involved in the management of this cancer have promoted the drafting of a new dedicated document. This document was drawn up according to the GRADE methodology needed to produce guidelines based on evidence. Here is presented the second part of guidelines, focused on the multidisciplinary tumor board of experts and non-surgical treatments of HCC.

Transradial access (TRA) is a safe and comfortable approach and the preferred access for percutaneous coronary intervention. However, TRA is not widely used for peripheral interventions. Currently, there is a lack of data on patient selection, appropriate medical devices, complication prevention, and TRA adoption. Therefore, the Chinese Society of Interventional Oncology of the China Anti-Cancer Association organized nationwide experts to establish a Working Group of China Expert Consensus on TRA in percutaneous peripheral interventions in 2022, and jointly formulated this consensus to better promote the application of TRA in peripheral interventions to guide clinicians on patient selection, technical recommendations, and physician training. This consensus mainly focuses on the current situation, advantages and limitations of TRA in peripheral interventions, anatomical characteristics of the radial artery, patient selection, technical aspects, prevention and management of complications, radiation dose, and learning curve. A consensus was reached through a literature evaluation and by referring to the opinions of the expert group.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) consists of conventional TACE (cTACE) and drug-eluting beads TACE (DEB-TACE). The benefits of the 2 treatments remain controversial. We conduct this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of the 2 methods for the patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

In order to get a sound conclusion, we did thorough search all relevant studies with clear and stringent keyword criteria on the main databases. Objective tumor response rate, overall survival (OS) rate and adverse events were calculated and analyzed by RevMan 5.3 software. The random-effects or fixed-effects model was applied to pool the estimates according to Cochran Q test and I2 statistics.

Twenty-four studies involving 2987 patients were eligible. DEB-TACE significantly improved objective tumor response rate (OR) (risk ratio [RR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.08, 1.48]; P = .003). While as for 1-year, 2-year, 3-year, 5-year OS rates, there were no evidences to indicate that DEB-TACE was significantly better than cTACE (RR = 1.05, 95% CI [0.99, 1.11]; P = .08), (RR = 1.02, 95% CI [0.93, 1.11]; P = .68), (RR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.77, 1.10]; P = .37), (RR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.47, 1.80]; P = .81), respectively. Adverse events rate (AE) was also similar in both groups (RR = 1.11, 95% CI [0.99,1.26]; P = .08).

This meta-analysis demonstrates that DEB-TACE is not superior than cTACE regarding to OS and AE. However, DEB-TACE still be considered to provide a better objective tumor response rate for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide and approximately one-third of patients present with intermediate-stage disease. The treatment landscape of intermediate-stage HCC is rapidly evolving due to developments in local, locoregional and systemic therapies. Treatment recommendations focused on this heterogenous disease stage and that take into account the Canadian reality are lacking. To address this gap, a pan-Canadian group of experts in hepatology, transplant, surgery, radiation therapy, nuclear medicine, interventional radiology, and medical oncology came together to develop consensus recommendations on management of intermediate-stage HCC relevant to the Canadian context.

A modified Delphi framework was used to develop consensus statements with strengths of recommendation and supporting levels of evidence graded using the AHA/ACC classification system. Tentative consensus statements were drafted based on a systematic search and expert input in a series of iterative feedback cycles and were then circulated via online survey to assess the level of agreement.

The pre-defined ratification threshold of 80 % agreement was reached for all statements in the areas of multidisciplinary treatment (n = 4), intra-arterial therapy (n = 14), biologics (n = 5), radiation therapy (n = 3), surgical resection and transplantation (n = 7), and percutaneous ablative therapy (n = 4). These generally reflected an expansion in treatment options due to developments in previously established or emergent techniques, introduction of new and more active therapies and increased therapeutic flexibility. These developments have allowed for greater treatment tailoring and personalization as well as a paradigm shift toward strategies with curative intent in a wider range of disease settings.

This study compared the efficacy and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB)-TACE in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This retrospective analysis included 370 patients with HCC treated with cTACE (n = 248) or DEB-TACE (n = 122) (January 2000-July 2014). Overall survival (OS) was assessed using uni- and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier analysis. Additionally, baseline imaging was assessed, and clinical and laboratory toxicities were recorded. Propensity score weighting via a generalized boosted model was applied to account for group heterogeneity. There was no significant difference in OS between cTACE (20 months) and DEB-TACE patients (24.3 months, ratio 1.271, 95% confidence interval 0.876-1.69; p = 0.392). However, in patients with infiltrative disease, cTACE achieved longer OS (25.1 months) compared to DEB-TACE (9.2 months, ratio 0.366, 0.191-0.702; p = 0.003), whereas DEB-TACE proved more effective in nodular disease (39.4 months) than cTACE (18 months, ratio 0.458, 0.308-0681; p = 0.007). Adverse events occurred with similar frequency, except for abdominal pain, which was observed more frequently after DEB-TACE (101/116; 87.1%) than cTACE (119/157; 75.8%; p = 0.02). In conclusion, these findings suggest that tumor morphology and distribution should be used as parameters to inform decisions on the selection of embolic materials for TACE for a more personalized treatment planning in patients with unresectable HCC.

With the advent of effective systemic therapy, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is established as a highly effective locoregional treatment modality for carefully selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This randomized controlled trial was conducted to clarify whether selective TACE with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) loaded with epirubicin or selective conventional TACE (cTACE) with epirubicin-ethiodized oil might be more effective for obtaining complete response(CR) in patients with HCC.

Between March 2016 and May 2019, Child-Pugh class A or B patients with unresectable HCC who were scheduled to receive selective TACE were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to the DEB-TACE arm or the cTACE arm. The primary endpoint was the CR rate at 3 months, as evaluated according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors by an independent review committee, and the secondary endpoints were the CR rate at 1 month and incidences of adverse events.

A total of 200 patients (DEB-TACE, 99 patients; cTACE, 101 patients) were enrolled in the study. The CR rates at 3 months and 1 month were significantly higher in the cTACE arm (75.2%, 84.2%) as compared with the DEB-TACE arm (27.6%, 35.7%). However, the frequencies of adverse events of any grade, including pyrexia (DEB-TACE vs. cTACE, 19.4% vs. 45.5%, p = 0.0001), fatigue (5.1% vs. 15.8%, p = 0.0194), malaise (11.1% vs. 25.7%, p = 0.0103), appetite loss (12.1% vs. 28.7%, p = 0.0048), abdominal pain (12.1% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.0423), increased serum bilirubin (22.2% vs. 48.5%, p = 0.0002), hypoalbuminemia (43.4% vs. 60.3%, p = 0.0154), increased serum aspartate aminotransferase (35.7% vs. 81.2%, p < 0.0001), and increased serum alanine aminotransferase (35.7% vs. 77.2%, p < 0.0001), were also significantly higher in the cTACE arm than in the DEB-TACE arm.

Selective cTACE appeared to have higher CR rates for local tumor control as compared to selective DEB-TACE for HCC. However, the frequency of postembolization syndrome was also significantly higher in the cTACE group than in the DEB-TACE group. Thus, to achieve CR, cTACE may be selected over DEB-TACE in patients who can be expected to tolerate postembolization syndrome.

Almost 15 years after the introduction of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with drug-eluting beads (DEB-TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) therapy, the mean peak plasma concentration (C_max) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for doxorubicin have still not been systematically reviewed or meta-analyzed.

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of available data and establish a reference range for C_max and AUC of doxorubicin DEB-TACE and TACE, as well as explore the potential influence of microspheres' size and type on these parameters.

PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched from August 1992 through December 2021. Studies measuring exposure parameters among HCC patients treated with doxorubicin DEB-TACE without restriction on language were included. Two independent reviewers extracted and unified data sets for pooled estimate analysis. The quality of the evidence was assessed via the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. The ClinPK Statement checklist and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) were used to determine the quality of studies.

Out of 666 studies, 246 full-text were reviewed, and 8 studies entered the meta-analysis (120 patients). C_max and AUC of doxorubicin were 7.52-fold (95% CI 7.65 to 7.42-fold; P < 0.0001) and 1.91-fold (95% CI 1.95 to 1.88-fold; P = 0.0001) lower with DEB-TACE compared to TACE. Significant reduction in pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of C_max and AUC was observed with DEB-TACE versus TACE in direct comparison analysis (- 2.93; 95% CI - 3.60 to - 2.26, P < 0.00001, and - 1.73 95% CI - 2.55 to - 0.91, P < 0.0001, respectively). Moreover, in DEB-TACE stratification analysis, small microspheres revealed higher C_max, AUC and tumor response rate as well as lower complication rate.

The heterogeneity could not be completely addressed through sensitivity and stratification analysis.

This meta-analysis provides exposure parameters of doxorubicin and justifies the advantage of DEB-TACE over TACE in terms of safety for patients with unresectable HCC. This study showed a marked association between the size of microsphere and exposure parameters of doxorubicin supporting the preference for small microspheres in DEB-TACE. The moderate and low quality of evidence is assigned to the C_max and AUC, respectively.

(1) Background: Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a minimally invasive procedure, characterized by the selective occlusion of tumor-feeding hepatic arteries, via injection of an embolizing agent and an anticancer drug. It represents a standard of care for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and it is also increasingly performed in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), as well as in liver metastases. Apart from the original method, based on intra-arterial infusion of a liquid drug followed by embolization, newer particle-based TACE procedures have been introduced recently. As yet, comprehensive data on current trends of TACE, as well as its in-hospital mortality in Germany, which could help to further improve outcome following TACE, are missing. (2) Methods: Based on standardized hospital discharge data, provided by the German Federal Statistical Office from 2010 to 2019, we aimed at systematically evaluating current clinical developments and in-hospital mortality related to TACE in Germany. (3) Results: A total of 49,595 individual cases undergoing TACE were identified within the observation period. The overall in-hospital mortality was 1.00% and significantly higher in females compared to males (1.12 vs. 0.93%; p < 0.001). We identified several post-interventional complications, such as liver failure (51.49%), sepsis (33.87%), renal failure (23.9%), and liver abscess (15.87%), which were associated with a significantly increased in-hospital mortality. Moreover, in-hospital mortality significantly differed between the underlying indications for TACE (HCC: 0.83%, liver metastases: 1.22%, and CCA: 1.40%), as well as between different embolization agents (liquid embolization: 0.80%, loaded microspheres: 0.92%, spherical particles: 1.54%, and non-spherical particles: 2.84%), for which we observed large geographic differences in their frequency of use. Finally, in-hospital mortality was significantly increased in centers with a low annual TACE case volume (<15 TACE/year: 2.08% vs. >275 TACE/year: 0.45%). (4) Conclusion: Our data provide a systematic overview of indications and embolization methods for TACE in Germany. We identified a variety of factors, such as post-interventional complications, the embolization method used, and the hospitals’ annual case volume, which are associated with an increased in-hospital mortality following TACE. These data might help to further reduce the mortality of this routinely performed local-ablative procedure in the future.

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is used as palliative and neoadjuvant treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TACE should be offered as palliative treatment to patients with intermediate stage large or multinodular HCC if no curative treatment option is available by resection or thermoablation and if extrahepatic metastases and tumor infiltration of main portal and systemic veins has been excluded. TACE is possible only in patients with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A-B, best up to 7 points) and with good performance status (ECOG 0). TACE can be used for bridging and for downstaging prior to liver transplantation with the intention to maintain or reach limited intrahepatic tumor load defined by Milan criteria. TACE should be adapted to the vascularization pattern of the HCC nodules and performed as selective as possible and repetetively if necessary with the goal of complete devascularization of the tumor tissue. Conventional TACE (cytotoxic drugs, iodized oil and embolic particles) and drug-eluting TACE (anthracycline preloaded in microspheres) can be used in a comparable way. During drug-eluting TACE, peripheral concentration of cytotoxic drugs is lower. Using conventional TACE in a palliative setting, survival benefit for patients was 8-11 months compared to best supportive care; however, this requires that all known contraindications and other criteria in terms of tumor and liver disease, respectively, associated with negative prognosis be taken into consideration. Better local response is achieved by drug-eluting TACE; however, no related survival benefit was shown compared to conventional TACE so far. Response to neoadjuvant local treatment is associated with improved prognosis after liver transplantation.