Patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) are often interested in dietary interventions as a means of managing their symptoms. However, the relative efficacy of available diets for the management of IBS is unclear. We aimed to examine the relative efficacy of various dietary interventions in IBS.

For this systematic review and network meta-analysis we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, EMBASE Classic, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from database inception to Feb 7, 2025, to identify randomised controlled trials comparing an active dietary intervention requiring changes to the intake of more than one food in IBS with either a control intervention, such as a habitual diet, sham diet, a high fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet, or alternative miscellaneous dietary advice, or any other active dietary intervention requiring changes to the intake of more than one food. We assessed efficacy using dichotomous assessments of improvement in global IBS symptoms or improvement in individual IBS symptoms, including abdominal pain, abdominal bloating or distension, and bowel habit. We pooled data using a random-effects model, with the efficacy of each intervention reported as pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% CIs. We ranked interventions according to their P-score, which measures the mean extent of certainty that one intervention is better than another, averaged over all competing interventions.

We identified 28 eligible randomised controlled trials (comprising 2338 patients) of 11 different dietary interventions compared with four control interventions, of which six (low FODMAP diet, British Dietetic Association/National Institute for Health and Care Excellence [BDA/NICE] diet, lactose-reduced diet, starch-reduced and sucrose-reduced diet, a personalised diet, and a Mediterranean diet) were studied in more than one trial. For global IBS symptoms, assessed in 28 randomised controlled trials and when considering only the dietary interventions studied in more than one trial, a starch-reduced and sucrose-reduced diet ranked first (RR of global IBS symptoms not improving 0·41 [95% CI 0·26-0·67]; P-score 0·84; two trials), a low FODMAP diet ranked fourth (0·51 [0·37-0·70]; P-score 0·71; 24 trials), and a BDA/NICE diet ranked tenth (0·62 [0·43-0·90]; P-score 0·44; eight trials), versus a habitual diet. For abdominal pain, assessed in 26 trials and when considering only the dietary interventions studied in more than one randomised controlled trial, a starch-reduced and sucrose-reduced diet ranked second (RR of abdominal pain not improving 0·54 [95% CI 0·33-0·90]; P-score 0·73; two trials), and a low FODMAP diet ranked fifth (0·61 [0·42-0·89]; P-score 0·64; 23 trials), versus a habitual diet. For abdominal bloating or distension, assessed in 26 trials and when considering only the dietary interventions studied in more than one randomised trial, only a low FODMAP diet (RR of abdominal bloating or distension not improving 0·55 [95% CI 0·37-0·80]; P-score 0·64; 23 trials) was superior to a habitual diet and ranked fourth. For bowel habit, assessed in 23 randomised trials, none of the dietary interventions was superior to any of the control interventions, but a low FODMAP diet was superior to a BDA/NICE diet (RR of bowel habit not improving 0·79 [95% CI 0·63-0·99]). All comparisons across the network were rated as low or very low confidence, except for direct comparisons between a low FODMAP diet or a starch-reduced and sucrose-reduced diet and habitual diet, both of which were rated as moderate confidence.

In terms of dietary interventions for IBS, the most evidence exists for a low FODMAP diet, but other promising therapies are emerging and should be the subject of further study.

None.

Patients with endometriosis often experience bowel symptoms such as changing stool, abdominal pain and bloating similar to those associated with irritable bowel syndrome. These symptoms reduce quality of life (QoL). Visceral hypersensitivity seems to be a shared pathogenic factor. The low-FODMAP (Fermentable Oligosaccharides, Disaccharides, Monosaccharides and Polyols) diet is a known visceral hypersensitivity targeted therapy with significant reduction in bowel symptoms. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of low-FODMAP diet on bowel symptoms such as constipation and bloating, pain and QoL in patients with endometriosis.

The diet involved four weeks of FODMAP elimination, followed by a reintroduction-period of at least ten weeks, varying by patient. Questionnaires were sent at baseline and after these periods. The primary outcome was constipation change after the reintroduction period compared to baseline, assessed by Groningen-DeFeC-questionnaire (0-30 scale) with paired-T-test or Wilcoxon-signed-rank-test. Secondary outcomes included changes in bloating, QoL and abdominal pain, assessed by Endometriosis Health Profile-30 (EHP-30). P-value < 0,05 indicated statistical significance.

Forty-seven patients were included; thirteen withdrew before starting the diet, mostly due to lack of motivation. Of the remaining 34, 24 (71%) completed the diet (i.e. following the prescribed periods) Constipation scores improved significantly after low-FODMAP diet compared to baseline from 7.0 to 5.0 (p = 0.023). There was no significant difference observed in bloating, however 53% of patients that completed the diet mentioned a decrease. The following domains of the EHP-30 improved significantly: pain (from 47.8 to 29.2 (p = 0.002)), control and powerlessness (from 69.4 to 36.7 (p = 0.000)), emotional well-being (from 45.2 to 29.2 (p = 0.001)), social support (from 46.4 to 31.3 (p = 0.0017)), self-image (from 51.2 to 40.5 (p = 0.035)), work-life (from 35.0 to 21.7 (p = 0.003)) and sexual intercourse (from 61.6 to 45.7 (p = 0.023)). 65% of patients that completed the diet mentioned a decrease in pain, especially chronic pelvic pain.

This study suggests the low-FODMAP diet may improve bowel symptoms and QoL in endometriosis patients motivated to follow the diet, highlighting its potential in endometriosis care. However, further research in larger populations is needed to explore factors like endometriosis type, pain intensity and dropout rates to confirm these findings.

ICTRP: NL-OMON28996: Feasibility study: The effect of the low FODMAP diet on women suffering from endometriosis ( https://trialsearch.who.int/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=NL-OMON28996 ) on September 13th 2019.

Background: While the low fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols diet, low FODMAP diet (LFD) has demonstrated effectiveness in managing irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms, little is known about sex-specific responses to this dietary intervention. Aim: This study evaluates the role of sex differences in symptom improvement following a dietitian-led, group education session on the LFD for IBS patients. Methods: A total of 305 patients, including 249 with a diagnosis of IBS and 56 classified as having suspected IBS, were enrolled in this study (79.7% female). Patients attended two group education sessions on the LFD. Primary outcomes were measured using the IBS Symptom Severity Score (IBS-SSS) and the Global Symptom Question (GSQ). Secondary outcomes included stool frequency, stool consistency and individual symptoms assessed by the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale. Statistical analyses were performed to compare baseline and follow-up data within and between sexes. Results: Both male and female patients experienced significant reductions in IBS-SSS scores and improvements in GSQ satisfactory relief, stool frequency, stool consistency and individual gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms following the LFD (p < 0.05). There were no significant between-sex differences in the extent of symptom relief (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The study found no significant sex-based differences in symptom reduction or GI relief following the intervention. These findings suggest that, despite differing symptom profiles and IBS prevalence, both male and female patients achieve similar relief with the LFD group education.

Recent studies show that the increase in breath hydrogen (BH2) and symptoms after ingestion of inulin are reduced by coadministering psyllium (PI).

To determine if slowing delivery of inulin to the colon by administering it in divided doses would mimic the effect of PI. Primary endpoint was the BH2 area under the curve AUC0-24 h. Secondary endpoints included BH2 AUC0-6 h, 6-12 h, and 12-24 h. Exploratory endpoints included the correlation of BH2 AUC0-24 h with dietary fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) intake and in vitro fermentation results.

A total of 17 healthy adults were randomly assigned to a single-blind, 3-arm, crossover trial. All consumed 20 g inulin (I) powder dissolved in 500 mL water and mixed with either 20 g maltodextrin (control) or 20 g PI consumed as a single dose or 20 g inulin given in divided doses (DDI), 62.5 mL every 45 min over 6 h. Twenty-four-hour BH2, dietary FODMAP intake, stool microbiota, and gas production in vitro were measured. Responders were defined as those whose AUC0-24 h BH2 was reduced by PI, whereas nonresponders showed no reduction.

Compared with control, PI did not reduce mean BH2 AUC0-24 h, whereas DDI increased it, P < 0.0002. DDI and PI both significantly reduced BH2 AUC0-6 h compared with the control, P < 0.0001. However, subsequently, DDI significantly increased BH2 from 6 to 12 h (P < 0.0001) and overnight (12-24 h) (P < 0.0001), whereas PI did so only overnight (P = 0.0002). Nonresponders showed greater release of arabinose during in vitro fermentation and higher abundance of 2 species, Clostridium spp. AM22_11AC and Phocaeicola dorei, which also correlated with BH2 production on PI. Dietary FODMAP intake tended to correlate inversely with BH2 AUC0-24 h (r = -0.42, P = 0.09) and correlated with microbiome community composition.

DDI, like PI, reduces early BH2 production. PI acts by delaying transit to the colon but not reducing colonic fermentation over 24 h. Dietary FODMAP intake correlates with BH2 response to inulin and the microbiome. This trial was registered at www.

gov as NCT05619341.

Different diets have emerged as potential therapeutic options for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS).

To identify predictors of improvement after a low-FODMAP, low-starch and low-sucrose diet among patients with IBS.

We performed a descriptive cross-sectional study including patients with IBS according to Rome IV criteria undertaking a social-media based program with a two-week dietary intervention. Patients completed an online survey before and after the intervention including the presence of intestinal and extra-intestinal symptoms, the IBS-SSS (irritable bowel syndrome symptoms severity scale) and the PHQ-9 (patient health questionnaire-9). Clinical improvement was defined as a decrease of at least 50% in IBS-SSS post dietary intervention. Variables associated with symptomatic response were identified with logistic regression analysis. A clinical score to predict response was created and tested with a with a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

A total of 3583 patients with IBS were included. Mean IBS-SSS before and after dietary intervention was 295.5±52.32 and 240±48.66, respectively (p=0.01); 1178 (32.8%) patients showed clinical improvement. A mean basal IBS-SSS >400 (OR 3.04), chronic headache (OR 1.96), and chronic fatigue (OR 1.81) were significantly associated with symptomatic response. Patients with arthralgia (OR 0.41) and/or fibromyalgia (OR 0.33) were less likely to improve. Each variable received the following individuals scores: IBS-SSS >400: +2, chronic headache: +1.5, chronic fatigue: +1, arthralgia: -1, and fibromyalgia: -1. The ROC curve analysis of the proposed score showed an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% CI 0.69-0.76). A score ≥3 had a sensitivity of 72.64% and specificity of 60.56% for predicting symptomatic improvement.

There are clinical variables that could serve as reliable predictors of response to a low-FODMAP, low-sucrose, low-starch diet among patients with IBS. Further research is needed to understand the link between the presence of extra-intestinal symptoms and clinical improvement after dietary interventions for IBS.

Background/Objectives: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent functional gastrointestinal disorder. Emerging evidence implicates gut microbiota dysbiosis in IBS pathogenesis, and probiotic interventions targeting microbial modulation hold therapeutic promise. Methods: this study used fecal microbiota transplantation to establish a mouse model of IBS before evaluating the effects of the complex probiotic by using metagenomics and targeted metabolomics to explore the potential mechanism. Results: After 14 days, the probiotic relieved constipation, reduced inflammation and intestinal permeability, lowered 5-HT levels and increased serotonin transporter (SERT) expression in tissues. Metagenomic analysis showed a reduced inflammation-related species abundance. It also decreased fecal butyric acid, acetic acid and tryptophan levels in IBS mice. Conclusions: The probiotic complex effectively alleviated IBS symptoms in mice by modulating gut microbiota and fecal metabolites, providing insights for future IBS research and treatment.

The dietary restriction of fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAPs), called the low-FODMAP diet (LFD), is frequently used to manage irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). This service evaluation aimed to assess the long-term effectiveness of the LFD in managing IBS symptoms and whether symptom response and dietary adherence to the LFD were associated.

This observational service evaluation collected data via questionnaires during clinical dietetic appointments for IBS management. Symptom severity was reported at baseline, short term (following FODMAP restriction) and long term (following FODMAP reintroduction). Additional data that captured experiences following the LFD were collected at long-term follow-up.

Of 184 patients, 14% reported satisfactory relief from global symptoms at baseline, which increased to 69% at short-term follow-up and 57% at long-term follow-up (p < 0.001). The most notable improvements in individual symptoms between baseline and long-term follow-up were abdominal bloating (72% baseline, 48% long term, p < 0.001), abdominal pain (61% baseline, 30% long term, p < 0.001) and flatulence (71% baseline, 40% long term, p < 0.001). High adherence with the LFD at short-term follow-up was not associated with long-term symptom improvement, but there was an association between long-term adherence and global symptom severity (p = 0.032). Completion of FODMAP reintroduction as per protocol was associated with long-term symptom improvement (p = 0.049).

The LFD is an effective treatment for managing IBS symptoms in the long term, particularly, when the diet is adhered to and reintroduction is completed as per dietetic education. Further randomised-controlled trials are required to explore the cause-and-effect relationship between LFD and IBS symptom management.

Cirrhosis is a medical condition marked by persistent liver damage, which leads to the development of fibrous tissue and compromised liver function. In the present study, we decided to investigate the possibility of a connection between the consumption of fermentable olig-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) and mortality rates in cirrhotic patients by utilizing data obtained from a prospective cohort study.

This cohort study enrolled 166 ambulatory patients from two hospitals in Tehran, Iran, between 2016 and 2018, and followed them up for 5 48 months until April 30, 2022. During the 3,955 person-months of follow-up, 43 fatalities were recorded (36 men and 7 women). The study classified participants into three groups based on their FODMAPs consumption and assessed the risk of mortality using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

Total FODMAPs intake was associated with increased overall mortality risk (T3 vs. T1, HR = 3.5; 95%CI: 1.05, 11.7; P-trend = 0.036). This significant trend was also observed for total fructans (T3 vs. T1, HR = 5.15; 95% CI: 1.15, 23.2; P-trend = 0.006) and fructose (T3 vs. T1, HR = 5.55; 95% CI: 0.54, 57.14; P-trend = 0.018). Mortality risk was U-shaped with galactooligosaccharide intake, a lower mortality risk was observed with lactose intake and a higher mortality risk with polyols intake, although these associations did not reach statistical significance.

In conclusion, this study highlights a higher risk of mortality with higher intake of fructans, excess fructose and total FODMAPs.

The efficacy of probiotics and diet management in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is controversial, and their relative effectiveness remains unclear.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of probiotics, diet management, and their combination on IBS.

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science were searched from inception to July 10, 2023, for relevant studies, including symptom relief, IBS-symptom severity score (-SSS), and IBS-quality of life measure (-QOL).

Two investigators independently performed the data extraction and quality assessment.

A network meta-analysis was performed using a frequentist approach and a random-effects model to estimate the relative risk (RR) and 95% CI.

Forty-four articles were eligible for this study. In relieving IBS symptoms, compared with a sham diet, a low-fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyols (low-FODMAP) diet (RR: 3.22; 95% CI: 1.70-6.26) and low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (RR: 17.79; 95% CI: 3.27-112.54) significantly relieved IBS symptoms. The control group showed significantly lower effectiveness than the probiotics group (RR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.32-0.69). According to the surface under the cumulative rank curve (SUCRA), a low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (80.4%) had the best effect in relieving IBS symptoms, followed by a low-FODMAP diet (70.8%), probiotics (65.1%), and a gluten-free diet (54.3%). In reducing the total IBS-SSS, the low-FODMAP diet (90.5%) was the most effective, followed by the low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics (76.6%), probiotics alone (62.3%), and gluten-free diet (28.3%). In reducing total IBS-QOL, probiotics (72.1%) ranked first, followed by gluten-free (57.0%) and low-FODMAP (56.9%) diets. Probiotics (34.9%) were associated with the lowest risk of adverse effects.

A low-FODMAP diet combined with probiotics is most effective in relieving IBS symptoms. A low-FODMAP diet is the most recommended diet for alleviating IBS severity, and probiotics were associated with improving the QOL of patients with IBS, with the fewest adverse events.

PROSPERO registration no. CRD42024499113.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is frequently observed in clinical practice and affects people from different parts of the world. The pathogenesis and aetiology are not well-defined or fully understood; however, altered bowel movements, psychological factors, and visceral hypersensitivity may contribute to symptoms via a pathway mediated by serotonin and other enteric neurotransmitters. Altered bowel movements, including diarrhoea and constipation, abdominal pain relieved by passing flatus, and bloating are the main salient features of this condition. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness and efficacy of a low-fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (low-FODMAP) diet in these patients. Systematic searches were conducted on PubMed, Medline, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), systematic trials and cohort studies that included keywords about IBS and a low-FODMAP diet were included. Exclusion criteria included studies that were not in the English language, not relevant to IBS, diet-related to inflammatory bowel disease, or not pertinent to the subject. A total of 41 studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. There was significant heterogeneity among the RCTs; hence, a random-effects model was used. The systematic review included a total of 8460 patients across 36 studies, with follow-up durations ranging from 11 to 16 months. Specifically, the meta-analysis included 15 RCTs with 1118 participants and follow-up durations from two days to nine weeks and six cohort studies including 292 patients with follow-up durations from two weeks to two years. The risk ratio (RR) was 1.21 (95% confidence interval= 0.98-1.51), and the I2 value ​​​​​was 63% for global symptom improvement with a low-FODMAP diet using a random-effects model. There was a low risk of bias in the RCTs. Five studies were included evaluating the effect of a low-FODMAP diet on quality of life, and these studies did not show any statistically significant benefit of a low-FODMAP diet on quality of life, although a mean difference of 4.59 (95% CI 1.50-7.67) was observed. The risk of bias was moderate to severe in the observational studies included in this review. Food intolerance is increasingly recognised as a contributory factor in IBS, and its role in the pathogenesis and precipitation of symptoms is being explored. Specific mechanisms include the fermentation of FODMAPs by the gut microbiota, leading to gas production and subsequent symptoms.

The gut microbiome is essential for children's normal growth and development, with its formation aligning closely with key stages of growth. Factors like birth method, feeding practices, and antibiotic exposure significantly shape the composition and functionality of the infant gut microbiome. Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) involves an abnormal increase in bacteria within the small intestine. This overgrowth can interfere with digestion, impair nutrient absorption, and lead to both local and systemic inflammation, potentially contributing to malnutrition. In this review, we provide a comprehensive overview of the current understanding of the relationship between SIBO and malnutrition, with a particular focus on the pediatric population. SIBO seems to play an important role in nutrient malabsorption through the gut microbiome imbalance, local inflammation, and disruption of the mucosal intestinal barrier. Additionally, SIBO is more prevalent in digestive disorders linked to malabsorption and malnutrition. Different therapeutic strategies for addressing malnutrition-related SIBO have been proposed. While antibiotics are the primary treatment for SIBO, their effectiveness in promoting weight gain among malnourished children remains uncertain. Hence, future research directed at the impact of microbiome imbalance on nutrient intake and absorption could bring to light new strategies for the effective prevention and treatment of malnutrition.

Introduction: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common condition that alters the quality of life of patients. A variety of dietary interventions have been introduced to address this debilitating condition. The low-FODMAP diet (LFD), gluten-free diet (GFD), and Mediterranean diet are examples showing efficacy. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare these interventions to find the best approach. Methods: We performed a systematic review of the available literature through 14 March 2024 in the following databases: Embase, PubMed, MEDLINE OVID, Web of Science, CINAHL Plus, and Cochrane Central. We only included randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We used a random effects model and conducted a direct meta-analysis based on the DerSimonian-Laird approach and a network meta-analysis based on the frequentist approach. Mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. The primary outcomes included IBS quality of life (IBS QOL) and IBS symptom severity scale (IBS-SSS). Results: We finalized 23 studies including 1689 IBS patients. In the direct meta-analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in any IBS score between GFD and either LFD or standard diet. Meanwhile, the LFD was statistically superior to the standard diet in the IBS-SSS (MD: -46.29, CI: -63.72--28.86, p < 0.01) and IBS QOL (MD: 4.06, CI: 0.72-7.41, p = 0.02). On ranking, the Mediterranean diet showed the greatest improvement in IBS-SSS, IBS-QOL, distension, dissatisfaction, and general life interference, followed by the LFD alone or in combination with the GFD. Conclusions: We demonstrated the efficacy of dietary interventions such as the LFD and Mediterranean diet in improving IBS. There is a need for large RCTs with head-to-head comparisons, particularly for the Mediterranean diet.

The implementation of the fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can be effectively delivered by dietitians in group settings. The initial FODMAP restriction phase is recommended to be followed for 4 weeks; however, limited efficacy data exist for 4-week FODMAP restriction in group education clinical practice.

We aimed to compare 4-week versus 8-week FODMAP group treatment pathways on clinical outcomes using a prospective service evaluation design of IBS patients attending FODMAP restriction (baseline) and reintroduction (follow-up) group sessions (between 2015 and 2019). Clinical outcomes included global symptom question (GSQ) measuring satisfactory relief, gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS), stool frequency (SF), stool consistency using Bristol stool form scale (BSFS), diet acceptability, patient satisfaction with group sessions and dietary adherence. Logistic regression was used to test for differences in treatment effects when clinical outcomes were compared between groups.

Patients (n = 284) included were aged 18 to 86 years (mean ± SD [standard deviation], 44.6 ± 15.5), 80% female, and were split into 4-week (41%, 117/284) versus 8-week (59%, 167/284) pathways with no differences in baseline characteristics. Mean ± SD time gap between baseline and follow-up was 4.6 ± 0.9 weeks in the 4-week pathway and 9.6 ± 3.3 weeks in the 8-week pathway. When groups were compared at follow-up, no statistical differences were observed in any measures (GSQ, GSRS, SF, BSFS, dietary adherence, diet acceptability and patient satisfaction).

A 4-week dietitian-led group FODMAP treatment pathway is as clinically effective and maintains patient acceptability when compared to 8-weeks and should be considered as part of routine clinical practice.

Diet is a cornerstone in the management of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). There is evidence of efficacy across the spectrum of dietary management strategies, including some supplements (eg, specific fibres), foods, and whole diets (eg, a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols [known as the low-FODMAP diet]). Whole-diet interventions, in particular those that restrict intake, can be challenging to deliver effectively and safely. Factors to consider include patient demographics, food cost and availability, and the acceptability of dietary management and its impact on food-related quality of life. There is concern regarding a potential role of restrictive whole-diet interventions in eating disorder risk. Optimal approaches to delivering dietary management in the health-care setting are unclear. The aim of this Review is to summarise the clinical evidence for the dietary management of IBS; to discuss the challenges, burdens, and risks of dietary management; and to propose how these challenges, burdens, and risks should be mitigated and minimised in clinical practice.

Endometriosis is a chronic, complex, systemic inflammatory condition that impacts approximately 190 million girls and women worldwide, significantly impacting their quality of life. The effective management of endometriosis requires a multi-disciplinary and holistic approach, one that includes surgical and medical management, such as a laparoscopy and a chronic medical management plan, as well as dietary, nutritional, and lifestyle adjunct interventions, such as pelvic pain physiotherapy and acupuncture. There is growing evidence to support the role of dietary and nutritional interventions in the adjunct management of endometriosis-related pain and gastrointestinal symptoms. However, the implementation of these interventions is often not regulated, as patients with endometriosis often adopt self-management strategies. Diet and nutrition can modulate key players integral to the pathophysiology of endometriosis, such as, but not limited to, inflammation, estrogen, and the microbiome. However, it is unclear as to whether diet plays a role in the prevention or the onset of endometriosis. In this review, we discuss three key players in the pathogenesis of endometriosis-inflammation, estrogen, and the microbiome-and we summarize how diet and nutrition can influence their mechanisms, and consequently, the progression and manifestation of endometriosis. There is a major need for evidence-based, non-invasive adjunct management of this debilitating disease, and diet and nutritional interventions may be suitable.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a highly prevalent and debilitating disorder of gut-brain interaction (DGBI) affecting millions globally. It imposes a significant burden on healthcare systems and is a leading cause of workplace absenteeism. IBS is classified into several subtypes based on predominant presenting symptoms, including IBS with constipation (IBS-C) and IBS with diarrhea (IBS-D), with each requiring targeted approaches to treatment. Some treatments, such as psychotherapy, dietary intervention, and medications like tricyclic antidepressants, are nonspecific and recommended for managing IBS symptoms across all subtypes. In contrast, therapies like secretagogues for IBS-C and eluxadoline or rifaximin for IBS-D are subtype-specific. However, many IBS treatments carry conditional recommendations and are based on low-certainty evidence, emphasizing the need for further research to expand the available treatment options. This review compares the latest IBS management guidelines from the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), and European Society for Neurogastroenterology and Motility (ESNM). Pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies, including established and emerging interventions, will be explored to provide a comprehensive guide to management.

Gastrointestinal (GI) complications are a significant source of morbidity for people with cystic fibrosis (PwCF). Historically, dietary recommendations in CF have focused on calories, typically emphasizing a high fat diet. The changing landscape of CF highlights the need to update this nutritional strategy. There is little research into how the quality of calories consumed by PwCF influences nutritional outcomes, GI symptoms, or likely contributors: intestinal inflammation and GI microbiology. We assessed the feasibility of a whole foods-based diet (WFD) and avoidance of ultra-processed foods, measuring safety/tolerability, adherence, and GI symptoms, as well as fecal measures of inflammation and microbiota among children with CF (CwCF) with GI symptoms.

Single center, 4-week dietary intervention involving CwCF aged 5-14 years who screened positive on GI symptom questionnaire. Assessments included weight, symptom questionnaires and adverse events (AEs). Stool was analyzed for microbiota (16S rRNA) and calprotectin.

108 children were pre-screened, 9 enrolled and 8 initiated and completed the study. There were no significant changes in weight and no AEs. PEDS-QL GI identified overall improvement in symptoms. Certain symptom domains (constipation, diarrhea, gas/bloating, stomach pain and hurt) demonstrated significant improvement on the WFD. Of two participants with abnormal fecal calprotectin at enrollment, both exhibited decreased values on WFD. There was no significant change in microbiota diversity.

A WFD diet was feasible and safe in CwCF. There was improvement in GI symptom scores based on both parent and child assessments. Larger studies are needed to further investigate effects on intestinal inflammation and microbiota.

The low fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides and polyols (FODMAP) diet (LFD) is a second-line dietary intervention for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients, involving FODMAP restriction, reintroduction, and personalization, and it needs to be delivered by dietitians. However, the application of this diet among Malaysian IBS patients is not well understood. This study aimed to explore the practices and barriers in delivering the LFD among Malaysia dietitians. Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted online with practicing dietitians until the data reached saturation. All the interview sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data. Eleven dietitians were interviewed, with 36.4% (n = 4) having more than 10 years of experience. The following four themes regarding their practices emerged: 1. dietary advice on FODMAP restriction; 2. duration of FODMAP restriction phase; 3. references used to get information about FODMAPs, and 4. strategies on reintroduction. Meanwhile, the following seven barriers were identified: 1. lack of culturally relevant educational materials; 2. limited knowledge about the LFD; 3. inadequate formal training among dietitians; 4. lack of integration in multi-disciplinary care; 5. low health literacy of patients; 6. low compliance rate among patients, and 7. restrictions for certain populations. LFD implementation in Malaysia is not standardized as only experienced dietitians can provide dietary evidence-based advice. Lack of training and culturally specific resources are some of the main barriers that were identified to be limiting the implementation of the diet. Therefore, there is a need for training programs and resource development to support Malaysian dietitians in managing IBS patients.

Introduction: This study aimed to understand the influence of diet and nutrition items on gastrointestinal symptoms in patients with Hirschsprung Disease (HD). Method: An online questionnaire was created to obtain patient-reported outcomes using the multinational Holistic Care in Hirschsprung Disease Network. This was distributed in Dutch, English, German, Italian, Polish, and Swedish via patient associations. Information on demographics, the extension of disease, current diet, and the influence of food ingredients on bowel function were obtained. Results: In total, 563 questionnaires were answered by parents or patients themselves. The length of the aganglionic segment was short in 33%, long in 45%, total colonic aganglionosis (TCA) in 11%, and involved the small intestine in 10%. Overall, 90% reported following a mixed diet, and 31% reported taking probiotics, with twice as many patients taking probiotics in the TCA group compared to standard HD. Mealtimes and behaviours around eating were affected by 61%, while 77% had established food items that worsened symptoms, and of these, 80% stated that they had worked these items out themselves. A high-fibre diet was followed by 24% and 18% a low-fibre diet. Symptoms were reported, particularly from dairy in 30%, fruits in 39%, pulses in 54%, and sugar in 48%. Conclusions: This first multinational survey on diet and bowel function in HD reports an association between certain dietary items with gastrointestinal symptoms. This study can support an improved understanding of the interaction between food items and bowel function in children with HD. We suggest a multidisciplinary approach to balance dietary exclusions and support adequate growth, preventing nutrition deficiencies and enhancing quality of life.

A diet with low content of fermentable oligo-, di-, and monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) is established treatment for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), with well-documented efficiency. A starch- and sucrose-reduced diet (SSRD) has shown similar promising effects. The primary aim of this randomized, non-inferiority study was to test SSRD against low FODMAP and compare the responder rates (RR = ∆Total IBS-SSS ≥ -50) to a 4-week dietary intervention of either diet. Secondary aims were to estimate responders of ≥100 score and 50% reduction; effects on extraintestinal symptoms; saturation; sugar craving; anthropometric parameters; and blood pressure. 155 IBS patients were randomized to SSRD (n = 77) or low FODMAP (n = 78) for 4 weeks, with a follow-up 5 months later without food restrictions. The questionnaires Rome IV, IBS-severity scoring system (IBS-SSS), and visual analog scale for IBS (VAS-IBS) were completed at baseline and after 2 and 4 weeks and 6 months. Weight, height, waist circumference, and blood pressures were measured. Comparisons were made within the groups and between changes in the two groups. There were no differences between groups at baseline. The responder rate of SSRD was non-inferior compared with low FODMAPs at week 2 (79.2% vs. 73.1%; p = 0.661;95% confidence interval (CI) = -20-7.2) and week 4 (79.2% vs. 78.2%; p = 1.000;95%CI = -14-12). Responder rate was still high when defined stricter. All gastrointestinal and extraintestinal symptoms were equally improved (p < 0.001 in most variables). SSRD rendered greater reductions in weight (p = 0.006), body mass index (BMI) (p = 0.005), and sugar craving (p = 0.05), whereas waist circumference and blood pressure were equally decreased. Weight and BMI were regained at follow-up. In the SSRD group, responders at 6 months still had lowered weight (-0.7 (-2.5-0.1) vs. 0.2 (-0.7-2.2) kg; p = 0.005) and BMI (-0.25 (-0.85-0.03) vs. 0.07 (-0.35-0.77) kg/m2; p = 0.009) compared with baseline in contrast to non-responders. Those who had tested both diets preferred SSRD (p = 0.032). In conclusion, a 4-week SSRD intervention was non-inferior to low FODMAP regarding responder rates of gastrointestinal IBS symptoms. Furthermore, strong reductions of extraintestinal symptoms were found in both groups, whereas reductions in weight, BMI, and sugar craving were most pronounced following SSRD.

Individuals with non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity (NCGWS) experience improvement in gastrointestinal symptoms following a gluten-free diet. Although previous results have indicated that fructo-oligosaccharides (FOS), a type of short-chain fructans, were more likely to induce symptoms than gluten in self-reported NCGWS patients, the underlying mechanisms are unresolved.

Our main objective was therefore to investigate whether FOS-fructans and gluten affect the composition and diversity of the faecal microbiota (16S rRNA gene sequencing), faecal metabolites of microbial fermentation (short-chain fatty acids [SCFA]; gas chromatography with flame ionization detector), and a faecal biomarker of gut inflammation (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin, also known as lipocalin 2, NGAL/LCN2; ELISA). In the randomised double-blind placebo-controlled crossover study, 59 participants with self-reported NCGWS underwent three different 7-day diet challenges with gluten (5.7 g/day), FOS-fructans (2.1 g/day), and placebo separately (three periods, six challenge sequences).

The relative abundances of certain bacterial taxa were affected differently by the diet challenges. After the FOS-fructan challenge, Fusicatenibacter increased, while Eubacterium (E.) coprostanoligenes group, Anaerotruncus, and unknown Ruminococcaceae genera decreased. The gluten challenge was primarily characterized by increased abundance of Eubacterium xylanophilum group. However, no differences were found for bacterial diversity (α-diversity), overall bacterial community structure (β-diversity), faecal metabolites (SCFA), or NGAL/LCN2. Furthermore, gastrointestinal symptoms in response to FOS-fructans were generally not linked to substantial shifts in the gut bacterial community. However, the reduction in E. coprostanoligenes group following the FOS-fructan challenge was associated with increased gastrointestinal pain. Finally, correlation analysis revealed that changes in gastrointestinal symptoms following the FOS-fructan and gluten challenges were linked to varying bacterial abundances at baseline.

In conclusion, while FOS-fructans induced more gastrointestinal symptoms than gluten in the NCGWS patients, we did not find that substantial shifts in the composition nor function of the faecal microbiota could explain these differences in the current study. However, our results indicate that individual variations in baseline bacterial composition/function may influence the gastrointestinal symptom response to both FOS-fructans and gluten. Additionally, the change in E. coprostanoligenes group, which was associated with increased symptoms, implies that attention should be given to these bacteria in future trials investigating the impact of dietary treatments on gastrointestinal symptoms.

Clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02464150.

Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common gastrointestinal disorder with gut microbiota imbalance playing a significant role. There are increasing numbers of research studies exploring treatment options involving probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT), but it is still uncertain which treatment option is superior. The research was conducted on various databases and unpublished trial data (up to February 2023). Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were screened for adult patients with IBS comparing interventions with placebo. Probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, and FMT were assessed for their impact using mean difference and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Out of 6528 articles, 54 were included for probiotics, 7 for prebiotics/synbiotics, and 6 for FMT. Probiotics showed improvement in IBS symptoms, particularly with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains. Prebiotics and synbiotics did not show significant improvement. Network meta-analysis indicated the favorable effects of probiotics (OR = 0.53, 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.59) and FMT (OR = 0.46, 95% CI, 0.33 to 0.64) on IBS, with no serious adverse events reported. In short, probiotics and FMT are effective for managing IBS, with Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus being dominant strains. However, the most effective probiotic combination or strain remains unclear, while prebiotics and synbiotics did not show significant improvement.

A low FODMAP diet (LFD) is an established dietary treatment for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, knowledge on the extended effects of the restriction phase regarding nutrient intake, symptom severity, and quality of life (QoL) is sparse. Therefore, our objectives were to evaluate the safety of a dietitian-led 12-week strict LFD on measures of blood biochemistry, nutritional status, symptom severity, and QoL.

In this open-label dietitian-led 12-week strict LFD intervention for IBS patients with predominantly diarrhea or mixed stool pattern (IBS-D/-M), we collected data on diet intake (3-day dietary record), overnight fasting routine blood samples, body weight, IBS symptoms (IBS Severity Scoring System (IBS-SSS)), and IBS-related QoL (IBS-QoL) at baseline and after 12 weeks.

Thirty-six participants completed the 12-week follow-up (mean age: 37 years, 67% women, IBS-SSS: 242 (101)). All blood parameters measured were within established reference values at both time points. We found no change in intake of macro- or micronutrients, but several micronutrients were below the recommendations both before and after 12 weeks. BMI slightly decreased, primarily driven by participants with BMI >25 (p < 0.005). QoL improved among most subdomains (p ≤ 0.002), except food avoidance and social reaction.

An extended dietitian-guided LFD (12 weeks) is not inferior to the participants' baseline diet, since no clinically meaningful changes in nutritionally related blood samples and no changes in macro- or micronutrient intake were observed. However, the intake of several nutrients was below the recommendations at both time points indicating low diet quality.

Small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) is characterized by an increase in the bacterial population of the small intestine due to an imbalance between the amount of bacteria and the intestinal barrier. Pediatric SIBO presents with a wide spectrum of symptoms, ranging from mild gastrointestinal complaints to malabsorption or malnutrition. Breath tests are commonly used as noninvasive diagnostic tools for SIBO, but a standardized methodology is currently unavailable. Intestinal flora produces methane which slows intestinal transit and increases the contractile activity of small intestine. Emerging literature suggests a correlation between overgrowth of methanogenic bacteria in the intestines and constipation. Treatment of SIBO involves administration of antibacterial therapy in addition to management of underlying conditions and optimal dietary adjustments. However, research on antibiotic treatment for pediatric patients with constipation and SIBO is limited and has yielded conflicting results. In the current review, we summarize the state-of-the-art of the field and discuss previous treatment attempts and currently used regimens for SIBO patients with constipation, with a focus on pediatric populations.

Dietary intake plays a pivotal role in ulcerative colitis (UC) initiation and prognosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a combined Mediterranean, low-FODMAP diet accompanied with partial enteral nutrition (PEN) on clinical and para-clinical characteristics of patients with UC. Fifty patients with active mild to moderate UC were received either a combined diet or a regular diet for 6 weeks. Before and after the intervention, disease activity index, quality of life and some inflammatory and oxidative stress factors were measured using valid and reliable questionnaires and blood sampling. Disease activity index was significantly decreased in the combined diet group in comparison to control diet group (p = 0.043), and baseline data (p < 0.001). Moreover, the quality of life score increased significantly in the combined diet group compared to the control group, and the baseline data (p < 0.001). Serum level of high sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) decreased significantly in the combined group (p < 0.01), while it increased in the control group non-significantly. Serum total anti-oxidant capacity (TAC) changes were not statistically significant in two groups. This study indicates that this combination diet has the potential to be used as a safe and highly effective approach in patients with significant intestinal symptoms. Further clinical trial studies with different duration of intervention are needed to confirm these results.Trial registration: The study was registered on IRCT.ir with registration number of IRCT20100524004010N38, on 25/04/2023.

Neurogastroenterology and Motility is a Gastroenterology subspecialty dealing with the management of gastrointestinal (GI) motor diseases and disorders of gut-brain interaction (DGBI). Both types of conditions may impair the nutritional status of patients - In the case of motility disorders, because deficient gastrointestinal motility may impair appropriate food digestion and absorption; in DGBI because development of gastrointestinal symptoms may impair appropriate patient nutrition. In both cases, different studies have shown that patients start restrictive diets on their own, without supervision of a dietician, which leads to nutritional deficits in many cases. Likewise, psychological factors like stressful situations or anxiety may trigger gastrointestinal symptoms in these patients, mainly in those with DGBI. Recent studies comparing a patient-centered approach that includes medical treatment, dietary modifications, and behavioural interventions with gastroenterologist-only standard care have shown a greater proportion of improved symptoms, psychological status, and quality of life, as well as reduced costs in patients allocated to the multidisciplinary treatment arm. In conclusion, there is growing evidence in favour of dietary and behavioural interventions by specialized professionals, coupled with appropriate medical evaluation and treatment by a gastroenterologist. Hence the importance of developing reference units in which comprehensive, individualized management may be offered. Multidisciplinary models improve clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction, which should result in a reduction of direct and indirect costs.  .

Dietary advice and medical treatments are recommended to patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Studies have not yet compared the efficacy of dietary treatment with pharmacological treatment targeting the predominant IBS symptom. We therefore aimed to compare the effects of two restrictive dietary treatment options versus optimised medical treatment in people with IBS.

This single-centre, single-blind, randomised controlled trial was conducted in a specialised outpatient clinic at the Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden. Participants (aged ≥18 years) with moderate-to-severe IBS (Rome IV; IBS Severity Scoring System [IBS-SSS] ≥175) and no other serious diseases or food allergies were randomly assigned (1:1:1) by web-based randomisation to receive a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) plus traditional IBS dietary advice recommended by the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (hereafter the LFTD diet), a fibre-optimised diet low in total carbohydrates and high in protein and fat (hereafter the low-carbohydrate diet), or optimised medical treatment based on predominant IBS symptom. Participants were masked to the names of the diets, but the pharmacological treatment was open-label. The intervention lasted 4 weeks, after which time participants in the dietary interventions were unmasked to their diets and encouraged to continue during 6 months' follow-up, participants in the LFTD group were instructed on how to reintroduce FODMAPs, and participants receiving pharmacological treatment were offered diet counselling and to continue with their medication. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who responded to the 4-week intervention, defined as a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS relative to baseline, and was analysed per modified intention-to-treat (ie, all participants who started the intervention). Safety was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02970591, and is complete.

Between Jan 24, 2017, and Sept 2, 2021, 1104 participants were assessed for eligibility and 304 were randomly assigned. Ten participants did not receive their intervention after randomisation and thus 294 participants were included in the modified intention-to-treat population (96 assigned to the LFTD diet, 97 to the low-carbohydrate diet, and 101 to optimised medical treatment). 241 (82%) of 294 participants were women and 53 (18%) were men and the mean age was 38 (SD 13). After 4 weeks, 73 (76%) of 96 participants in the LFTD diet group, 69 (71%) of 97 participants in the low-carbohydrate diet group, and 59 (58%) of 101 participants in the optimised medical treatment group had a reduction of 50 or more in IBS-SSS compared with baseline, with a significant difference between the groups (p=0·023). 91 (95%) of 96 participants completed 4 weeks in the LFTD group, 92 (95%) of 97 completed 4 weeks in the low-carbohydrate group, and 91 (90%) of 101 completed 4 weeks in the optimised medical treatment group. Two individuals in each of the intervention groups stated that adverse events were the reason for discontinuing the 4-week intervention. Five (5%) of 91 participants in the optimised medical treatment group stopped treatment prematurely due to side-effects. No serious adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred.

Two 4-week dietary interventions and optimised medical treatment reduced the severity of IBS symptoms, with a larger effect size in the diet groups. Dietary interventions might be considered as an initial treatment for patients with IBS. Research is needed to enable personalised treatment strategies.

The Healthcare Board Region Västra Götaland, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, AFA Insurance, grants from the Swedish state, the Wilhelm and Martina Lundgren Science Foundation, Skandia, the Dietary Science Foundation, and the Nanna Swartz Foundation.

This study investigated the effects of a high carbohydrate diet, with varied fermentable oligo-, di-, and mono-saccharide and polyol (FODMAP) content, before endurance exercise on gastrointestinal integrity, motility, and symptoms; and subsequent exercise performance. Twelve endurance athletes were provided with a 48 h high carbohydrate (mean ± SD: 12.1 ± 1.8 g kg day-1) diet on two separate occasions, composed of high (54.8 ± 10.5 g day-1) and low FODMAP (3.0 ± 0.2 g day-1) content. Thereafter, participants completed a 2 h steady-state running exercise at 60% of V ˙ O 2 max (22.9 ± 1.2 °C, 46.4 ± 7.9% RH), followed by a 1 h distance performance test. Pre-exercise and every 20 min during steady-state exercise, 100 mL maltodextrin (10% w/v) solution was consumed. A 150 mL lactulose (20 g) solution was consumed 30 min into the distance performance test to determine orocecal transit time (OCTT) during exercise. Blood was collected pre- and post exercise to determine gastrointestinal integrity biomarkers (i.e., I-FABP, sCD14, and CRP). Breath hydrogen (H2) and gastrointestinal symptoms (GIS) were determined pre-exercise, every 15 min, during and throughout recovery. No differences in gastrointestinal integrity biomarkers, OCTT, or distance completed were observed between trials. Pre-exercise total-GIS (1.3 ± 2.9 vs. 4.3 ± 4.4), gut discomfort (9.9 ± 8.1 vs. 15.8 ± 9.0), and upper-GIS (2.8 ± 2.6 vs. 5.7 ± 4.8) during exercise were less severe on high carbohydrate low FODMAP (HC-LFOD) versus high carbohydrate high FODMAP (HC-HFOD) (p < 0.05). Gut discomfort (3.4 ± 4.4 vs. 0.2 ± 0.6) and total-GIS (4.9 ± 6.8 vs. 0.2 ± 0.6) were higher during recovery on HC-LFOD versus HC-HFOD (p < 0.05). The FODMAP content of a 48 h high carbohydrate diet does not impact gastrointestinal integrity or motility in response to endurance exercise. However, a high FODMAP content exacerbates GIS before and during exercise, but this does not impact performance outcomes.

According to national guidelines, a diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) is a second-line therapy option for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and improves functional intestinal symptoms. Numerous noteworthy results have been published in this field over the past fifteen years. This study aims to analyze the global research trend and hotspot of the low FODMAP diet research, and provide a comprehensive perspective and direction for researchers.

The Science Citation Index-Expanded of the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) was used to identify low FODMAP diet-related articles and reviews. Three bibliometric programs (CiteSpace, VOSviewer, Scimago Graphic) were utilized to analyze and visualize the annual publications, authors, countries, institutions, journals, citations, and keywords.

In total, 843 documents related to the low FODMAP diet research were published in 227 journals by 3,343 authors in 1,233 institutions from 59 countries. The United States, which was the most engaged nation in international collaboration, had the largest annual production and the fastest growth. The most productive organization was Monash University, and the most fruitful researcher was Gibson PR. Nutrients ranked first in terms of the number of published documents. The article "A diet low in FODMAPs reduces symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome" (Halmos EP, 2014) received the most co-citations. Keywords that appear frequently in the literature mainly involve two main aspects: the clinical efficacy evaluation and mechanism exploration of the low FODMAP diet. The term "gut microbiota" stands out as the most prominent keyword among the burst keywords that have remained prevalent till date.

The restriction stage of the low FODMAP diet is superior to other dietary therapies for IBS in terms of symptom response, but it has a negative impact on the abundance of gut Bifidobacteria and diet quality. Identification of biomarkers to predict response to the low FODMAP diet is of great interest and has become the current research hotspot.

Migraine and irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) can be difficult-to-treat comorbidities that may be driven by underlying gut-brain axis dysfunction. This report describes utilization of a low-FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, and polyols) diet (LFD) in a patient with refractory migraine and co-occurring IBS.

After unremarkable physical and neurological examinations, a 57-year-old woman with IBS and chronic migraine was started on a LFD under the guidance of a registered dietician. Psychometrically validated surveys administered at baseline and initial follow-up assessed patient-reported outcomes related to migraine and IBS symptoms.

At baseline, the patient reported 80/90 migraine days with average pain of 8/10, a Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score of 33, and Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score of 64, the latter 2 scores indicating severe disability. Baseline IBS symptom severity was noted at 9/10. Within 1 week on a LFD, the patient's IBS symptoms and migraines improved in both frequency and intensity of episodes. After 5 weeks on a LFD elimination, the patient's clinical improvement continued and she reported significant reduction in migraines, with average pain of 1/10 and IBS severity of 3/10. The patient also improved from severe to minimal levels of disability on validated measures (MIDAS, HIT-6, and IBS Patient Global Impression of Change).

This is the first case report detailing successful initial treatment of migraine and co-occurring IBS utilizing a dietician-guided LFD. There are a number of important reasons for potential improvement in these gut-brain axis disorders which are reviewed as well as an implication for long-term management and food reintroduction. Larger, randomized trials evaluating a LFD in diverse individuals with migraine and co-occurring IBS are warranted to help confirm these results.

Food malabsorption and intolerance is implicated in gastrointestinal symptoms among patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). Key triggers include fructose and fructan. Prior studies examined fructose and fructan malabsorption separately in IBS patients. None have concurrently assessed both within the same patient group. We aimed to investigate the association between fructose and fructan malabsorption in the same patients with IBS using hydrogen breath testing (HBT).

We retrospectively identified patients with IBS who underwent fructose and fructan HBTs and abstracted their results from the electronic medical record. Fructose and fructan HBTs were performed by administering a 25 g fructose solution or 10 g fructan solution, followed by breath hydrogen readings every 30 min for 3 h. Patients were positive for fructose or fructan malabsorption if breath hydrogen levels exceeded 20 ppm.

Of 186 IBS patients, 71 (38.2%) were positive for fructose malabsorption and 91 (48.9%) were positive for fructan malabsorption. Of these patients, 42 (22.6%) were positive for fructose malabsorption and fructan malabsorption. Positive fructose HBT readings were significantly associated with positive fructan HBT readings (p = 0.0283). Patients positive for fructose malabsorption or fructan malabsorption had 1.951 times higher odds of testing positive for the other carbohydrate.

Our results reveal a clinically significant association between fructose malabsorption and fructan malabsorption in patients with IBS. Fructan malabsorption should be assessed in patients with fructose malabsorption, and vice versa. Further studies are required to identify the mechanisms underlying our findings.

Evidence suggests that the low fermentable oligo-, di-, mono-saccharides, and polyols (FODMAP) diet improves irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) symptoms when delivered by a dietitian. However, demand for dietetic appointments exceeds supply. Prerecorded webinars are acceptable and cost-effective for delivering first-line IBS dietary advice.

This study, using a pre-post design, aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a low-FODMAP diet restriction phase webinar at improving IBS symptoms. Participants with self-reported IBS symptoms were asked to report their IBS symptoms, stool frequency, stool consistency and IBS medication use, before and 8 weeks postwebinar via an online questionnaire. The presence and severity of participants' symptoms and bowel habits were captured using validated tools and a global symptom question.

In total 228 participants responded to both pre- and postsurveys. A statistically significant improvement in all symptoms was observed 8 weeks postwebinar (p < 0.05). The proportion of participants rating their overall symptoms as moderate-to-severe reduced from 85.5% at baseline to 34.6% postwebinar (50.9% reduction [p < 0.001]). The proportion of participants reporting normal stool consistency and frequency significantly increased postwebinar (23.2%-39.9% [p < 0.001] and 76.3%-89% [p < 0.001], respectively). Satisfactory relief of symptoms increased from 16.7% to 53.1%, (p < 0.001) 8 weeks postwebinar.

These results are comparable with literature on the efficacy of face-to-face delivery of low-FODMAP diet education. Dietitians should consider directing triaged patients with IBS, who have tried first-line dietary advice, to this webinar as an alternative or alongside current practice.

There is large variation in response to diet in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) and determinants for differential response are poorly understood.

Our aim was to investigate differential clinical and molecular responses to provocation with fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) and gluten in individuals with IBS.

Data were used from a crossover study with week-long interventions with either FODMAPs, gluten or placebo. The study also included a rapid provocation test. Molecular data consisted of fecal microbiota, short chain fatty acids, and untargeted plasma metabolomics. IBS symptoms were evaluated with the IBS severity scoring system. IBS symptoms were modelled against molecular and baseline questionnaire data, using Random Forest (RF; regression and clustering), Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC), and univariate methods.

Regression and classification RF models were in general of low predictive power (Q2 ≤ 0.22, classification rate < 0.73). Out of 864 clustering models, only 2 had significant associations to clusters (0.69 < CR < 0.73, p < 0.05), but with no associations to baseline clinical measures. Similarly, PARAFAC revealed no clear association between metabolome data and IBS symptoms.

Differential IBS responses to FODMAPs or gluten exposures could not be explained from clinical and molecular data despite extensive exploration with different data analytical approaches. The trial is registered at www.

gov as NCT03653689 31/08/2018.

Neuropathic pain (NP) is a chronic pain disorder arising from somatosensory nervous system impairment. Extensive evidence supports the notion that the gut microbiota (GM) is crucial in maintaining human health by performing vital tasks. At the same time, its disruption has been linked to the emergence and advancement of an expanding range of disorders, including NP, in which GM could play a role in its pathophysiology. The crosstalk between the nervous system and GM happens through immune mediators, metabolites, and nervous structures and involves both central and peripheral nervous systems. This literature review aims to thoroughly investigate the function of modulating GM in the treatment of NP. It will achieve this by integrating existing knowledge, identifying underlying mechanisms, and evaluating the possible clinical consequences of exploiting the gut-brain axis. We will cover the main therapeutic applications of the described GM-modulators, such as probiotics, faecal microbiota transplantation, dietary supplements and emotional support, to the main kinds of NP in which any evidence, even if only pre-clinical, has been unravelled in recent years. The explored NP areas include chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, diabetic neuropathy, trauma-induced neuropathic pain, trigeminal neuralgia, postherpetic neuralgia and low back pain.

A diet low in fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) improves functional bowel symptoms and is a second-line dietary management strategy for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The diet is complex and involves three stages: restriction, reintroduction and personalisation and clinical effectiveness is achieved with dietitian-led education; however, this is not always available. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the evidence for using the low FODMAP diet, with a focus on the impact of FODMAP restriction and reintroduction considering long-term management of IBS in a clinical setting. Randomised controlled trials have assessed symptom response, quality of life, dietary intake and changes to the gut microbiota during FODMAP restriction. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses consistently report that FODMAP restriction has a better symptom response compared with control diets and a network analysis reports the low FODMAP diet is superior to other dietary treatments for IBS. Research focused on FODMAP reintroduction and personalisation is limited and of lower quality, however common dietary triggers include wheat, onion, garlic, pulses and milk. Dietitian-led delivery of the low FODMAP diet is not always available and alternative education delivery methods, e.g. webinars, apps and leaflets, are available but remove the personalised approach and may be less acceptable to patients and may introduce safety concerns in terms of nutritional adequacy. Predicting response to the low FODMAP diet using symptom severity or a biomarker is of great interest. More evidence on less restrictive approaches and non-dietitian-led education delivery methods are needed.

The low FODMAP (fermentable oligosaccharide, disaccharide, monosaccharide, and polyol) diet is a beneficial therapeutic approach for patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, how the low FODMAP diet works is still not completely understood. These mechanisms encompass not only traditionally known factors such as luminal distension induced by gas and water but also recent evidence on the role of FOMAPs in the modulation of visceral hypersensitivity, increases in intestinal permeability, the induction of microbiota changes, and the production of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), as well as metabolomics and alterations in motility. Although most of the supporting evidence is of low quality, recent trials have confirmed its effectiveness, even though the majority of the evidence pertains only to the restriction phase and its effectiveness in relieving abdominal bloating and pain. This review examines potential pathophysiological mechanisms and provides an overview of the existing evidence on the effectiveness of the low FODMAP diet across various IBS subtypes. Key considerations for its use include the challenges and disadvantages associated with its practical implementation, including the need for professional guidance, variations in individual responses, concerns related to microbiota, nutritional deficiencies, the development of constipation, the necessity of excluding an eating disorder before commencing the diet, and the scarcity of long-term data. Despite its recognized efficacy in symptom management, acknowledging these limitations becomes imperative for a nuanced comprehension of the role of a low FODMAP diet in managing IBS. By investigating its potential mechanisms and evidence across IBS subtypes and addressing emerging modulations alongside limitations, this review aims to serve as a valuable resource for healthcare practitioners, researchers, and patients navigating the intricate landscape of IBS.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), including Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is a chronic immune-mediated disease. The incidence of IBD is influenced by various genetic and environmental factors, with dietary habits gaining significant scientific interest. While the role of diet in the pathogenesis and development of IBD is still debated, recent studies have demonstrated its potential impact. However, conflicting findings exist regarding the efficacy of dietary interventions in the treatment and control of IBD. This review aimed to summarize the current understanding of the relationship between diet and IBD, highlighting the different perspectives and reasonings observed in recent studies. Overall, it has been shown that dietary habits play a role in the incidence of IBD, and adopting a controlled dietary approach may help manage the disease. Consequently, diet can be considered a predictive and prognostic factor in IBD.

Individuals with coeliac disease (CeD) often experience gastrointestinal symptoms despite adherence to a gluten-free diet (GFD). While we recently showed that a diet low in fermentable oligo-, di-, monosaccharides and polyols (FODMAP) successfully provided symptom relief in GFD-treated CeD patients, there have been concerns that the low FODMAP diet (LFD) could adversely affect the gut microbiota. Our main objective was therefore to investigate whether the LFD affects the faecal microbiota and related variables of gut health. In a randomised controlled trial GFD-treated CeD adults, having persistent gastrointestinal symptoms, were randomised to either consume a combined LFD and GFD (n 39) for 4 weeks or continue with GFD (controls, n 36). Compared with the control group, the LFD group displayed greater changes in the overall faecal microbiota profile (16S rRNA gene sequencing) from baseline to follow-up (within-subject β-diversity, P < 0·001), characterised by lower and higher follow-up abundances (%) of genus Anaerostipes (Pgroup < 0·001) and class Erysipelotrichia (Pgroup = 0·02), respectively. Compared with the control group, the LFD led to lower follow-up concentrations of faecal propionic and valeric acid (GC-FID) in participants with high concentrations at baseline (Pinteraction ≤ 0·009). No differences were found in faecal bacterial α-diversity (Pgroup ≥ 0·20) or in faecal neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (ELISA), a biomarker of gut integrity and inflammation (Pgroup = 0·74), between the groups at follow-up. The modest effects of the LFD on the gut microbiota and related variables in the CeD patients of the present study are encouraging given the beneficial effects of the LFD strategy to treat functional GI symptoms (Registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03678935).

The quality of carbohydrates has metabolic consequences in people with prediabetes. However, the causality of short-chain fermentable carbohydrate intakes and metabolic parameters has not been explored in the prediabetic or diabetic population. We investigated associations between different types of carbohydrates, including fermentable oligosaccharides, disaccharides, monosaccharides, polyols (FODMAPs), and polysaccharides (dietary fibre), and body composition and glucose/insulin responses in subjects with prediabetes. In this prospective cross-sectional study, 177 subjects with impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) (mean age: 60 (54-62) years, 41% men) underwent an assessment of body composition and completed six-point oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT), Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA2-IR), insulin sensitivity, detailed 3-day food records, and physical activity questionnaire. Daily habitual FODMAP intake decreased progressively with increasing BMI, ranging from 7.9 (6.2-12.7) g/d in subjects with normal BMI and 6.6 (4.6-9.9) g/d in subjects with overweight to 5.8 (3.8-9.0) g/d in subjects with obesity (p = 0.038). After adjustment for age and gender, galactooligosaccharides (GOSs) were negatively correlated with body fat (Standardised Beta coefficient β = -0.156, p = 0.006) and positively associated with insulin sensitivity (β = 0.243, p = 0.001). This remained significant after adjustment for macronutrients, fibre, and physical activity (p = 0.035 and p = 0.010, respectively). In individuals with IGT, higher dietary GOS intake was associated with lower body fat and higher insulin sensitivity independent of macronutrients and fibre intake, calling for interventional studies to evaluate the effect of FODMAP intake in prediabetes.