|
1
|
Punnett G, Perry M, Eastwood C, Green L, Walter F, Yorke J. A cross-sectional analysis to characterise treatment decision making for advanced cancer at a tertiary treatment centre: Where can we improve the process? Eur J Oncol Nurs 2025; 74:102762. [PMID: 39798521 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejon.2024.102762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 11/26/2024] [Accepted: 12/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/15/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE In decisions relating to cancer treatment, the risks and benefits of treatment and the patient's preferences must be considered to ensure concordance with goals of care. Shared decision making (SDM) can facilitate these discussions and is associated with reduced decision conflict. This study aimed to characterise decision making for advanced cancer patients at a UK tertiary cancer centre and identify who may be at risk of suboptimal SDM and increased decision conflict. METHODS Participants completed the SDM-Q-9, decision conflict and decision self-efficacy scale following a consultation where an advanced cancer treatment decision was made. Pearson's chi-square test identified patient characteristics associated with SDM-Q-9, decision self-efficacy and decision conflict score categories; odds ratios were calculated to determine which patients were at increased probability of experiencing suboptimal SDM, low decision self-efficacy or high decision conflict. RESULTS Participant's (n = 211) scores indicated predominantly high SDM, high decision self-efficacy and low decision conflict. Patient gender and the presence of an informal caregiver in consultation were significantly associated with SDM-Q-9 score category (p > 0.05). Female patients (OR = 2.466, 95% CI: 1.223-4.974) and those attending consultations alone (OR = 0.440, 95% CI: 0.222-0.874) had greater odds of reporting lower SDM scores. CONCLUSION High SDM scores indicate either effective SDM behaviours or satisfaction with care biasing responses. Greater support to engage with SDM is required for female patients and those who attend alone in advanced cancer treatment decision consultations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant Punnett
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
| | - Melissa Perry
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Charlotte Eastwood
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK
| | - Laura Green
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Florian Walter
- Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| | - Janelle Yorke
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK; Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK; School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Taylor GD, Bulmer V. Advances in knowledge and practice benefiting the health and management of first permanent molars in children. Br Dent J 2025; 238:92-98. [PMID: 39856289 PMCID: PMC11761069 DOI: 10.1038/s41415-024-8012-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2024] [Revised: 09/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
First permanent molars (FPMs) remain the most affected teeth by dental conditions in childhood. Maintaining the health of FPMs should be prioritised by dental professionals. However, if subjected to unfavourable circumstances, FPMs can become compromised and impact the child negatively. In this article, we highlight current thinking and provide practical tips to prevent FPMs from becoming compromised. The importance of including the young person in decision-making and the influence different dental conditions might have on management of FPMs are discussed. Finally, the impact and treatment options available for FPMs should they become compromised are explored, focusing on the main question of whether to restore or extract these teeth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greig D Taylor
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK; Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
| | - Victoria Bulmer
- School of Dental Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Alashram AR. Effects of robotic therapy associated with noninvasive brain stimulation on motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. J Spinal Cord Med 2025; 48:6-21. [PMID: 38265422 PMCID: PMC11749291 DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2304921] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT Motor deficits are among the most common consequences of incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). These impairments can affect patients' levels of functioning and quality of life. Combined robotic therapy and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) have been used to improve motor impairments in patients with corticospinal tract lesions. OBJECTIVES To examine the effects of combined robotic therapy and NIBS on motor function post incomplete SCI. METHODS PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, PEDro, Web of Science, REHABDATA, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched from inception until July 2023. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was employed to evaluate the selected studies quality. RESULTS Of 557 studies, five randomized trials (n = 122), with 25% of participants being females, were included in this review. The PEDro scores ranged from eight to nine, with a median score of nine. There were variations in treatment protocols and outcome measures, resulting in heterogeneous findings. The findings showed revealed evidence for the impacts of combined robotic therapy and NIBS on motor function in individuals with incomplete SCI. CONCLUSIONS Combined robotic training and NIBS may be safe for individuals with incomplete SCI. The existing evidence concerning its effects on motor outcomes in individuals with SCI is limited. Further experimental studies are needed to understand the effects of combined robotic training and NIBS on motor impairments in SCI populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anas R. Alashram
- Department of Physiotherapy, Middle East University, Amman, Jordan
- Applied Science Research Center, Applied Science Private University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Human Sciences and Promotion of the Quality of Life, San Raffaele Roma Open University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
van Hienen A, Offermann C, Boersma L, Jacobs M, Fijten R. Bridging the care gap: patients' needs and experiences regarding shared decision-making in radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2025; 50:100897. [PMID: 39670055 PMCID: PMC11636202 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Revised: 11/15/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Shared decision-making (SDM), a collaborative process in which patients and physicians jointly determine further treatment, has been associated with numerous positive effects. However, its implementation into routine clinical practice faces challenges. In radiotherapy (RT) it may have additional challenges, since patients are referred from another oncologist, often "to undergo RT". The aim of this study is to understand patients' preferences and experiences regarding SDM at an academic RT clinic, and to identify targets for SDM implementation in RT. Materials and methods We adapted an earlier survey sent out by the Dutch Cancer Patient Organizations Federation to fit the RT setting. The survey was distributed via letters and social media to (former) patients who had their intake between 2020 and 2022. Results 1799 participants completed the survey, of whom 88,3% mentioned to always or often prefer SDM. 23,1% of participants reported experiencing a choice, and 50% of these participants experienced multiple options. The most commons reason for preferring SDM was bodily autonomy (n = 1114) and against SDM was wanting to decide themselves instead (n = 11). Participants with a higher educational attainment were more likely to prefer and experience SDM. Older participants were more likely to experience multiple options. Conclusion Our findings reaffirm that most cancer patients prefer SDM, and extend these findings to RT. However, we found a large gap between patients' desire for SDM, and the SDM experienced in our RT institute. SDM implementation strategies are needed and should focus on overcoming RT-specific and patient-reported barriers and opportunities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A.R. van Hienen
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Dr Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET, the Netherlands
| | - C.J.W. Offermann
- Maastro Clinic, Research Affairs department, Maastricht, Dr Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET, the Netherlands
| | - L.J. Boersma
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Dr Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET, the Netherlands
| | - M.J.G. Jacobs
- Department of Management, Tilburg School of Economics and Management, Tilburg University, Tilburg, Warandelaan 2, 5037 AB, the Netherlands
| | - R.R.R. Fijten
- Department of Radiation Oncology (MAASTRO), GROW Research Institute for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Dr Tanslaan 12, 6229 ET, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Tian CY, Wong ELY, Qiu H, Zhao S, Wang K, Cheung AWL, Yeoh EK. Patient experience and satisfaction with shared decision-making: A cross-sectional study among outpatients. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2024; 129:108410. [PMID: 39217830 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2024.108410] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 08/09/2024] [Accepted: 08/24/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aimed to investigate how doctor-patient communication, trust in doctors impacted patients' experience and satisfaction in shared decision-making (SDM). METHODS This study is based on the data from a cross-sectional survey (n = 12,401) conducted in 27 public specialist outpatient clinics in Hong Kong. RESULTS The multivariable regression models revealed that doctors' better communication skills were associated with lower decision-making involvement (odd ratio, 0.75 [95 % CI, 0.88-0.94], P < .001) but higher satisfaction with involvement (odd ratio, 6.88 [95 % CI, 5.99-7.93], P < .001). Similarly, longer consultation durations were associated with reduced involvement in decision-making (odd ratio, 0.71 [95 % CI, 0.66-0.73], P < .001) but increased satisfaction with involvement (odd ratio, 1.91 [95 % CI, 1.80-2.04], P < .001). Trust in doctors significantly mediated these associations, except for the association between consultation duration and patients' satisfaction with decision-making involvement. CONCLUSION Doctors' better communication skills and longer consultations might not necessarily increase patient involvement in SDM but correlated with increased satisfaction with involvement. Trust in doctors emerged as a mediator for participation and satisfaction in decision-making. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Clinics should consider patients' preferences and capabilities when tailoring communication strategies about decision-making and optimizing patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Yue Tian
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Eliza Lai-Yi Wong
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.
| | - Hong Qiu
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Shi Zhao
- School of Public Health, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Kailu Wang
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Annie Wai-Ling Cheung
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Eng-Kiong Yeoh
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China; Centre for Health Systems and Policy Research, JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Fitzgerald I, Sahm LJ, Howe J, Maidment I, Wallace E, Crowley EK. Shared decision-making interventions in the choice of antipsychotic prescription in people living with psychosis (SHAPE): Protocol for a realist review. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0304626. [PMID: 39052681 PMCID: PMC11271866 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304626] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) has yet to be successfully adopted into routine use in psychiatric settings amongst people living with severe mental illnesses. Suboptimal rates of SDM are particularly prominent amongst patients with psychotic illnesses during antipsychotic treatment choices. Many interventions have been assessed for their efficacy in improving SDM within this context, although results have been variable and inconsistent. AIMS To generate an in-depth understanding of how, why, for whom, and to what extent interventions facilitating the application of SDM during antipsychotic treatment choices work and the impact of contextual factors on intervention effectiveness. METHODS This review will use realist review methodology to provide a causal understanding of how and why interventions work when implementing SDM during antipsychotic treatment choices. The cohort of interest will be those experiencing psychosis where ongoing treatment with an antipsychotic is clinically indicated. The review will take place over five stages; (1) Locating existing theories, (2) Searching for evidence, (3) Selecting articles, (4) Extracting and organising data and (5) Synthesizing evidence and drawing conclusions. An understanding of how and why interventions work will be achieved by developing realist programme theories on intervention effectiveness through iterative literature reviews and engaging with various stakeholder groups, including patient, clinician and carer representatives. DISCUSSION This is the first realist review aiming to identify generative mechanisms explaining how and why successful interventions aimed at improving SDM within the parameters outlined work and in which contexts desired outcomes are most likely to be achieved. Review findings will include suggestions for clinicians, policy and decision-makers about the most promising interventions to pursue and their ideal attributes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ita Fitzgerald
- Pharmacy Department, St Patrick’s Mental Health Services, Dublin, Ireland
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Laura J. Sahm
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- Pharmacy Department, Mercy University Hospital, Cork, Ireland
| | - Jo Howe
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ian Maidment
- School of Pharmacy, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Emma Wallace
- Department of General Practice, School of Medicine, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Erin K. Crowley
- Pharmaceutical Care Research Group, School of Pharmacy, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Steel A, Foley H, Graham K, Harnett J, Adams J. Patient experiences of information-sharing and patient-centred care across the broad landscape of primary care practice and provision: a nationally representative survey of Australian adults. BMC PRIMARY CARE 2024; 25:151. [PMID: 38704562 PMCID: PMC11070095 DOI: 10.1186/s12875-024-02359-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Australian government strategies and frameworks have been developed in recent years to encourage the integration and coordination of primary care delivery; including patient-centred approaches to clinical and preventative care, and health promotion. This study aims to explore patient experiences of information-sharing and patient-centred care across various primary care clinical settings, with a particular focus on clinical encounters with GPs, naturopaths, osteopaths and acupuncturists. METHODS Data about healthcare utilisation and experiences from a 63-item cross-sectional survey obtained from a nationally representative sample of Australian adults aged ≥ 18 years were analysed. Chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis H tests were used to explore differences in the experiences of knowledge and information sharing during GP consultations among those who also consulted with a naturopath, osteopath or acupuncturist, compared those who had not. Logistic regression was used to investigate correlations between participants perceptions about GP consultation outcomes, and the GP's information-sharing behaviour or perceived experience of patient-centredness. RESULTS Across 2354 participants, verbal explanation (76.3%) and/or individualised handouts (16.8%) were the most common type of information shared in GP consultations. Individuals who consulted with a GP and a naturopath, an osteopath, or an acupuncturist reported a lower rate of receiving a verbal explanation from their GP but higher rate of receiving other types of information sources including handouts. Over one quarter of study participants who visited a GP did not discuss any of their health information with their GP. Information sharing was lower for individuals who also visited a naturopath, osteopath or acupuncturist. Participants scored their consultations with a GP as patient-centred, but these scores were lower among participants who also consulted with at least one other primary care practitioner type included in the study. CONCLUSIONS Public health and health services researchers, policymakers and leaders of primary care professions have a role and responsibility to ensure practitioners are confident and competent in sharing health information with their patients that considers their health literacy needs, and the importance of patient-centred care. Research focussed on a more in-depth understanding of the differences and relationships observed across the primary care landscape in this study is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amie Steel
- ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia.
| | - Hope Foley
- ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Kim Graham
- ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| | - Joanna Harnett
- School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Jon Adams
- ARCCIM, School of Public Health, Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235-253 Jones St, Ultimo, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Kunneman M. Shared decision-making to design care that fits for each patient. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2024; 10:32. [PMID: 38698050 DOI: 10.1038/s41572-024-00522-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Marleen Kunneman
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Keij SM, Branda ME, Montori VM, Brito JP, Kunneman M, Pieterse AH. Patient Characteristics and the Extent to Which Clinicians Involve Patients in Decision Making: Secondary Analyses of Pooled Data. Med Decis Making 2024; 44:346-356. [PMID: 38563311 PMCID: PMC10988989 DOI: 10.1177/0272989x241231721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The occurrence of shared decision making (SDM) in daily practice remains limited. Various patient characteristics have been suggested to potentially influence the extent to which clinicians involve patients in SDM. OBJECTIVE To assess associations between patient characteristics and the extent to which clinicians involve patients in SDM. METHODS We conducted a secondary analysis of data pooled from 10 studies comparing the care of adult patients with (intervention) or without (control) a within-encounter SDM conversation tool. We included studies with audio(-visual) recordings of clinical encounters in which decisions about starting or reconsidering treatment were discussed. MAIN MEASURES In the original studies, the Observing Patient Involvement in Decision Making 12-items (OPTION12 item) scale was used to code the extent to which clinicians involved patients in SDM in clinical encounters. We conducted multivariable analyses with patient characteristics (age, gender, race, education, marital status, number of daily medications, general health status, health literacy) as independent variables and OPTION12 as a dependent variable. RESULTS We included data from 1,614 patients. The between-arm difference in OPTION12 scores was 7.7 of 100 points (P < 0.001). We found no association between any patient characteristics and the OPTION12 score except for education level (p = 0.030), an association that was very small (2.8 points between the least and most educated), contributed mostly by, and only significant in, control arms (6.5 points). Subanalyses of a stroke prevention trial showed a positive association between age and OPTION12 score (P = 0.033). CONCLUSIONS Most characteristics showed no association with the extent to which clinicians involved patients in SDM. Without an SDM conversation tool, clinicians devoted more efforts to involve patients with higher education, a difference not observed when the tool was used. HIGHLIGHTS Most sociodemographic patient characteristics show no association with the extent to which clinicians involve patients in shared decision making.Clinicians devoted less effort to involve patients with lower education, a difference that was not observed when a shared decision-making conversation tool was used.SDM conversation tools can be useful for clinicians to better involve patients and ensure patients get involved equally regardless of educational background.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha M. Keij
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Megan E. Branda
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Victor M. Montori
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Juan P. Brito
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Marleen Kunneman
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
- Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Arwen H. Pieterse
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Prada BS, Jadhav U, Ghewade B, Wagh P, Karnan A, Ledwani A. Comparing Glycopyrronium/Formoterol Combination Therapy With Monotherapy in Moderate-to-Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD): A Narrative Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e58633. [PMID: 38770495 PMCID: PMC11103448 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58633] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) imposes a significant burden on individuals and healthcare systems globally. While bronchodilators, such as glycopyrronium and formoterol, are cornerstone therapies for COPD management, combining these agents has gained attention for potentially improving outcomes compared to monotherapy. This comprehensive review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of glycopyrronium/formoterol (GFF) combination therapy versus glycopyrronium monotherapy in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD. Through a systematic evaluation of clinical trials and real-world evidence, we analyze the impact of combination therapy on lung function, symptom control, exacerbation rates, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Furthermore, we examine the safety profile of combination therapy, including adverse cardiovascular and respiratory events. Comparative analyses with glycopyrronium monotherapy provide insights into the relative benefits and considerations for treatment selection. Factors influencing treatment choice and future directions in COPD management are also discussed. This review underscores the potential of combination therapy in optimizing COPD treatment outcomes and highlights areas for further research and clinical practice refinement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bollineni S Prada
- Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Ulhas Jadhav
- Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Babaji Ghewade
- Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Pankaj Wagh
- Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Ashwin Karnan
- Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| | - Anjana Ledwani
- Respiratory Medicine, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Datta Meghe Institute of Higher Education and Research, Wardha, IND
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Junger N, Hirsch O. Ethics of Nudging in the COVID-19 Crisis and the Necessary Return to the Principles of Shared Decision Making: A Critical Review. Cureus 2024; 16:e57960. [PMID: 38601812 PMCID: PMC11005480 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57960] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Nudging, a controversial technique for modifying people's behavior in a predictable way, is claimed to preserve freedom of choice while simultaneously influencing it. Nudging had been largely confined to situations such as promoting healthy eating choices but has been employed in the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) crisis in a shift towards measures that involve significantly less choice, such as shoves and behavioral prods. Shared decision making (SDM), a method for direct involvement and autonomy, is an alternative approach to communicate risk. Predominantly peer-reviewed scientific publications from standard literature databases like PubMed, PsycInfo, and Psyndex were evaluated in a narrative review. The so-called fear nudges, as well as the dissemination of strongly emotionalizing or moralizing messages can lead to intense psycho-physical stress. The use of these nudges by specialized units during the COVID-19 pandemic generated a societal atmosphere of fear that precipitated a deterioration of the mental and physical health of the population. Major recommendations of the German COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) study, which are based on elements of nudging and coercive measures, do not comply with ethical principles, basic psychological principles, or evidence-based data. SDM was misused in the COVID-19 crisis, which helped to achieve one-sided goals of governments. The emphasis on utilitarian thinking is criticized and the unethical behavior of decision makers is explained by both using the concept of moral disengagement and the maturity level of coping strategies. There should be a return to an open-ended, democratic, and pluralistic scientific debate without using nudges. It is therefore necessary to return to the origins of SDM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy Junger
- Psychology, Independent Researcher, Tübingen, DEU
| | - Oliver Hirsch
- Psychology, FOM University of Applied Sciences, Siegen, DEU
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Naye F, Toupin-April K, de Wit M, LeBlanc A, Dubois O, Boonen A, Barton JL, Fraenkel L, Li LC, Stacey D, March L, Barber CEH, Hazlewood GS, Guillemin F, Bartlett SJ, Berthelsen DB, Mather K, Arnaud L, Akpabio A, Adebajo A, Schultz G, Sloan VS, Gill TK, Sharma S, Scholte-Voshaar M, Caso F, Nikiphorou E, Nasef SI, Campbell W, Meara A, Christensen R, Suarez-Almazor ME, Jull JE, Alten R, Morgan EM, El-Miedany Y, Singh JA, Burt J, Jayatilleke A, Hmamouchi I, Blanco FJ, Fernandez AP, Mackie S, Jones A, Strand V, Monti S, Stones SR, Lee RR, Nielsen SM, Evans V, Srinivasalu H, Gérard T, Demers JL, Bouchard R, Stefan T, Dugas M, Bergeron F, Beaton D, Maxwell LJ, Tugwell P, Décary S. OMERACT Core outcome measurement set for shared decision making in rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a scoping review to identify candidate instruments. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2024; 65:152344. [PMID: 38232625 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2023.152344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Shared decision making (SDM) is a central tenet in rheumatic and musculoskeletal care. The lack of standardization regarding SDM instruments and outcomes in clinical trials threatens the comparative effectiveness of interventions. The Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) SDM Working Group is developing a Core Outcome Set for trials of SDM interventions in rheumatology and musculoskeletal health. The working group reached consensus on a Core Outcome Domain Set in 2020. The next step is to develop a Core Outcome Measurement Set through the OMERACT Filter 2.2. METHODS We conducted a scoping review (PRISMA-ScR) to identify candidate instruments for the OMERACT Filter 2.2 We systematically reviewed five databases (Ovid MEDLINE®, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and Web of Science). An information specialist designed search strategies to identify all measurement instruments used in SDM studies in adults or children living with rheumatic or musculoskeletal diseases or their important others. Paired reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full text articles. We extracted characteristics of all candidate instruments (e.g., measured construct, measurement properties). We classified candidate instruments and summarized evidence gaps with an adapted version of the Summary of Measurement Properties (SOMP) table. RESULTS We found 14,464 citations, read 239 full text articles, and included 99 eligible studies. We identified 220 potential candidate instruments. The five most used measurement instruments were the Decisional Conflict Scale (traditional and low literacy versions) (n=38), the Hip/Knee-Decision Quality Instrument (n=20), the Decision Regret Scale (n=9), the Preparation for Decision Making Scale (n=8), and the CollaboRATE (n=8). Only 44 candidate instruments (20%) had any measurement properties reported by the included studies. Of these instruments, only 57% matched with at least one of the 7-criteria adapted SOMP table. CONCLUSION We identified 220 candidate instruments used in the SDM literature amongst people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases. Our classification of instruments showed evidence gaps and inconsistent reporting of measurement properties. The next steps for the OMERACT SDM Working Group are to match candidate instruments with Core Domains, assess feasibility and review validation studies of measurement instruments in rheumatic diseases or other conditions. Development and validation of new instruments may be required for some Core Domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Naye
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Karine Toupin-April
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; Institut du savoir Montfort, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Annie LeBlanc
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada; VITAM Centre de recherche en santé durable, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Olivia Dubois
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | - Annelies Boonen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Maastricht University Medical Center and Caphri Research Institute, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jennifer L Barton
- VA Portland Health Care System, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, USA
| | - Liana Fraenkel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, USA
| | - Linda C Li
- Department of Physical Therapy, Arthritis Research Canada, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada; The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lyn March
- Department of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Department of Rheumatology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - Claire E H Barber
- Department of Medicine, Department of Community Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | | | | | - Susan J Bartlett
- Divisions of Clinical Epidemiology, Rheumatology and Respiratory Epidemiology and Clinical Trials Unit, McGill University, Canada; Research Institute - McGill University Health Centre, Canada; Johns Hopkins Medicine Division of Rheumatology, Montreal, Canada
| | - Dorthe B Berthelsen
- Section for Biostatistics and Evidence-Based Research, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen & Research Unit of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Research, Odense & Department of Rehabilitation, Municipality of Guldborgsund, Odense University Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Nykoebing, Denmark
| | | | - Laurent Arnaud
- Department of Rheumatology, CRMR RESO, University Hospitals of Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Adewale Adebajo
- Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health, University of Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Victor S Sloan
- Sheng Consulting LLC, Flemington, NJ, USA; The Peace Corps, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Tiffany K Gill
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Australia
| | - Saurab Sharma
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia; Centre for Pain IMPACT, Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, Australia
| | - Marieke Scholte-Voshaar
- Patient Research Partner, Department of Pharmacy and Department of Research & Innovation, Sint Maartenskliniek, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Department of Pharmacy, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen
| | - Francesco Caso
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples Federico II, Italy
| | - Elena Nikiphorou
- Centre for Rheumatic Diseases, King's College Hospital, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, UK; Rheumatology Department, King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - Samah Ismail Nasef
- Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt
| | - Willemina Campbell
- Patient research partner, Toronto Western Hospital, University Health Network, Canada
| | - Alexa Meara
- Division of Rheumatology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Robin Christensen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, & Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Maria E Suarez-Almazor
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | | | - Rieke Alten
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Rheumatology Research Center, Rheumatology, Clinical Immunology, Osteology, Physical Therapy and Sports Medicine, Schlosspark-Klinik, Charité, University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Esi M Morgan
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Division of Rheumatology, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | | | - Jennifer Burt
- Newfoundland and Labrador Health Services, St. Clare's Mercy Hospital, St John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada
| | | | - Ihsane Hmamouchi
- Health Sciences Research Centre (CReSS), Faculty of Medicine, International University of Rabat (UIR), Rabat, Morocco
| | - Francisco J Blanco
- Departamento de Fisioterapia, Medicina y Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de A Coruña, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Anthony P Fernandez
- Departments of Dermatology and Pathology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Sarah Mackie
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Musculoskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton Hospital, University of Leeds, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Allyson Jones
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Vibeke Strand
- Division of Immunology/Rheumatology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Sara Monti
- Department of Rheumatology, Policlinico S. Matteo, IRCCS Fondazione, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Simon R Stones
- Patient research partner, Envision Pharma Group, Wilmslow, UK
| | - Rebecca R Lee
- Centre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Division of Musculoskeletal and Dermatological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, Manchester University Hospital NHS Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Sabrina Mai Nielsen
- Musculoskeletal Statistics Unit, The Parker Institute, Department of Rheumatology, Odense University Hospital, and University of Southern Denmark, Copenhagen, Demark, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Vicki Evans
- Patient Research Partner and Discipline of Optometry, Faculty of Health, University of Canberra, Canberra, Australia
| | - Hemalatha Srinivasalu
- Pediatric Rheumatology, Children's National Hospital, Washington DC, USA; GW School of Medicine, Washington DC, USA
| | - Thomas Gérard
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada
| | | | - Roxanne Bouchard
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Théo Stefan
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | - Michèle Dugas
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Canada
| | | | | | - Lara J Maxwell
- Centre for Practice Changing Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Peter Tugwell
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, and School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa; Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Simon Décary
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, School of Rehabilitation, Research Centre of the CHUS, CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS, Université de Sherbrooke, 3001, 12e Avenue Nord, Sherbrooke, Quebec J1H 5N4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Bond M, Bicknell M, Crump T, Penner M, Veljkovic A, Wing K, Younger A, Liu G, Sutherland JM. Shared Decision Making in Hallux Valgus Surgery: A Prospective Observational Study. J Patient Exp 2024; 11:23743735241229376. [PMID: 38313865 PMCID: PMC10836134 DOI: 10.1177/23743735241229376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Patient-physician communication has the potential to improve outcomes and satisfaction through the shared decision-making process (SDM). This study aims to assess the relationship between perception of SDM and demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing Hallux Valgus (HV) correction. A prospective analysis of 306 patients scheduled for HV surgery was completed. The CollaboRATE score was used to measure SDM. Multivariable linear regression model was used to assess whether SDM scores were associated with preoperative characteristics or postoperative outcome scores. The mean CollaboRATE score was 2.9 (SD 0.9) and did not differ by age, socioeconomic status, or sex. Lower CollaboRATE scores were associated with more symptoms of depression, lower socioeconomic status, and lower general health scores (p-value < 0.05). There was no association between SDM scores and postoperative outcome scores. In this study, patients with depressive symptoms and lower socioeconomic status had worse perceptions of SDM. There was no difference in postoperative outcomes among participants based on SDM scores. Level of Evidence: Level III, prospective observational study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Bond
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Mattheus Bicknell
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Trafford Crump
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Murray Penner
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andrea Veljkovic
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kevin Wing
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Alastair Younger
- Department of Orthopaedics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Guiping Liu
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jason M Sutherland
- Centre for Health Services and Policy Research, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Haugom EW, Benth JŠ, Stensrud B, Ruud T, Clausen T, Landheim AS. Shared decision making and associated factors among patients with psychotic disorders: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:747. [PMID: 37833737 PMCID: PMC10576360 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05257-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision making is a process where patients and clinicians collaborate to make treatment choices based on the patients' preferences and best available evidence. The implementation of shared decision making remains limited for patients with psychotic disorders despite being recommended at policy level, being advocated as ethical right and wanted by the patient's. A barrier to implementation that is often mentioned is reduced decision-making capacity among patients. The challenges of implementing shared decision making highlights a need for more knowledge on shared decision making for these patients. Moreover, the association between patient-related characteristics and shared decision making is unclear, and further research have been suggested. More knowledge of factors associated with involvement in shared decision making can enhance understanding and help to empower patients in the decision-making process. The current study examined the extent of reported shared decision making among patients with a psychotic disorder in mental health care and factors associated with shared decision making. METHODS This study included 305 participants with a psychotic disorder from 39 clinical inpatient and outpatient sites across Norway. Shared decision making was assessed using the CollaboRATE survey. A linear mixed model was estimated to assess characteristics associated with shared decision making scores. RESULTS The CollaboRATE mean score was 6.3 (ranging from 0 to 9), the top score was 14.1% and increased global satisfaction with services was significantly associated with a higher level of shared decision making (regression coefficient 0.27, 95% confidence interval (0.23; 0.32), p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The low top score shows that few patients felt that they received the highest possible quality of shared decision making, indicating that many patients found room for improvement. This suggests that services for patients with psychotic disorders should be designed to give them a greater role in decision making. Shared decision making might play a key role in mental health care, ensuring that patients with psychotic disorders are satisfied with the services provided. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT03271242, date of registration: 5 Sept. 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Espen W Haugom
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Innlandet Hospital Trust, P.B 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway.
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Jūratė Šaltytė Benth
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital, P.O. Box 1000, 1478 Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Bjørn Stensrud
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Innlandet Hospital Trust, P.B 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
| | - Torleif Ruud
- Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Clausen
- Norwegian Centre for Addiction Research (SERAF), Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Blindern, Oslo, Norway
| | - Anne Signe Landheim
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Innlandet Hospital Trust, P.B 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Keij SM, Lie HC, Laidsaar-Powell R, Kunneman M, de Boer JE, Moaddine S, Stiggelbout AM, Pieterse AH. Patient-related characteristics considered to affect patient involvement in shared decision making about treatment: A scoping review of the qualitative literature. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING 2023; 111:107677. [PMID: 36857803 DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify patient-related characteristics considered to affect patient involvement in shared decision making (SDM) about treatment. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of qualitative studies. We searched for literature across seven databases until March 2022, and included qualitative studies that focused on associations between patient-related characteristics and SDM about treatment in adults. We analyzed studies using an inductive thematic approach. RESULTS The search yielded 5948 articles, of which 70 were included. We identified many different patient-related characteristics, which we grouped into four categories related to: (1) the individual who is facing the decision, (2) the decision, (3) the relationship between the patient and the clinician and others involved in the decision, and (4) the healthcare context. CONCLUSIONS Studies report a variety of patient-related characteristics that may affect patient involvement in SDM. Amongst others, patients may need to feel informed, to understand their role in SDM, and be able to communicate. Involvement may be challenging with characteristics such as perceived time pressure, poor patient-clinician relationships, emotional distress, and severe illness. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS In order to truly involve patients in SDM, we might need to focus on characteristics such as patient emotions and relationship building, besides information provision and values clarification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha M Keij
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands.
| | - Hanne C Lie
- Department of Behavioural Medicine, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Rebekah Laidsaar-Powell
- Centre for Medical Psychology and Evidence-Based Decision-Making (CeMPED), School of Psychology, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Marleen Kunneman
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Knowledge and Evaluation Research Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Joyce E de Boer
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Saïda Moaddine
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| | - Anne M Stiggelbout
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands; Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Arwen H Pieterse
- Medical Decision Making, Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Caspi I, Freund O, Pines O, Elkana O, Ablin JN, Bornstein G. Effect of patient COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy on hospital care team perceptions. World J Clin Cases 2023; 11:821-829. [PMID: 36818615 PMCID: PMC9928691 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i4.821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 01/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed new challenges in patient care worldwide. Vaccinations, which have proven efficacious in lowering the COVID-19 hospital burden, are still avoided by large populations. We, therefore, hypothesized that hospital care teams would have worse perceptions regarding the characteristics and care of patients with vaccine hesitancy.
AIM To evaluate whether patient vaccine hesitancy affected the hospital care team (HCT) perceptions.
METHODS We performed a prospective clinical study using structured questionnaires. We approached physicians and nurses with previous experience caring for COVID-19 patients from 11 medical centers across Israel during the fourth COVID-19 surge (September and October 2021). The participants completed a questionnaire with the following parts: (1) Sociodemographic characteristics; (2) Assessment of anger (STAXI instrument) and chronic workplace stress (Shirom-Melamed burnout measure); and (3) Three tools to assess the effect of patient vaccine hesitancy on the HCT perceptions (the difficult doctor-patient relation questionnaire, the medical staff perception of patient’s responsibility questionnaire and the characterological derogation questionnaire). Results were evaluated according to each part of the questionnaire and the questionnaire as a whole. Associations between HCT perceptions and their baseline characteristics, anger or chronic workplace stress were assessed.
RESULTS The HCT experienced their relationship with unvaccinated patients as more difficult (P < 0.001, Cohen’s d = 0.85), perceived unvaccinated patients as responsible for their medical condition (P < 0.001, d = 1.39) and perceived vaccinated patients as having a higher character value (P < 0.001, d = 1.03). Unvaccinated patients were considered selfish (P < 0.001), less mature (P < 0.001) and less satisfying to care for (P < 0.001). The relationship with unvaccinated patients was more difficult among HCT with higher burnout (r = 0.37, n = 66, P = 0.002). No correlations with baseline characteristics were found. All three study tools showed high internal consistency (α between 0.72 and 0.845).
CONCLUSION Our results should raise awareness of the possible effects of vaccine hesitancy on HCT perceptions regarding unvaccinated patients. In order to minimize the potential negative impact on patient care, designated departments should promote specific patient-centered preparations. Further investigations should assess whether vaccine hesitancy directly affects patient quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inbar Caspi
- Internal Medicine Department B, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Ophir Freund
- Internal Medicine Department B, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Omer Pines
- Behavioral Sciences Department, Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv 6818211, Israel
| | - Odelia Elkana
- Behavioral Sciences Department, Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yaffo, Tel Aviv 6818211, Israel
| | - Jacob N Ablin
- Internal Medicine Department H, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| | - Gil Bornstein
- Internal Medicine Department B, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center and Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6423906, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Yang Y, Qu T, Yang J, Ma B, Leng A. Confucian Familism and Shared Decision Making in End-of-Life Care for Patients with Advanced Cancers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph191610071. [PMID: 36011706 PMCID: PMC9408283 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191610071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
Shared decision-making (SDM) has been institutionally recognized as clinically effective by many Western healthcare systems. Nevertheless, it appears culturally unattractive in China, a country that adheres to Confucian familism which strongly prefers collective family decisions. This study examined this conflict and assessed the influence of Confucian familism on SDM in end-of-life (EOL) care for advanced cancer patients. Between August and November 2018, 188 EOL advanced-cancer patients were randomly recruited from 640 cancer hospital medical records at a Tertiary A-level hospital in Shandong province. Eventually, 164 (87.23%) sample patients were included in the statistical analysis after the non-responsive cases (4.79%) and missing value (7.98%) were removed. SDM was measured through SDM-Q-9, and the patient's siblings were used as indicators of Confucian Familism. Of the 164 patients, the mean SDM score was 38/100; 47.6% were thoroughly unfamiliar with their treatment plans and fell outside the decision-making procedure. Each patient had four siblings on average. Ceteris paribus, more siblings led to lower SDM. Moreover, being 56-65 years old and open-minded were associated with higher SDM, while higher satisfaction of the quality of EOL care yielded lower SDM. In conclusion, Confucian familism weakened patient-clinician SDM in EOL care for advanced cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexi Yang
- School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
| | | | - Jinyue Yang
- Qingdao Center for Women and Children’s Health and Family Planning Service, Qingdao 266034, China
| | - Ben Ma
- School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
| | - Anli Leng
- School of Political Science and Public Administration, Shandong University, Qingdao 266237, China
| |
Collapse
|