In patients with non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP) and non-obstructive dysphagia (NOD), standard esophageal high resolution manometry (HRM) with water swallows and/or solid meals may miss intermittent dysmotility. To what extent prolonged 24 h-measurements may increase the diagnostic sensitivity is currently unclear.

75 patients (47 female, 58 ± 16 years) with NCCP and/or NOD underwent standard HRM (single water swallows plus rice meal) and ambulatory 24-h-HRM with impedance. Results were analyzed according to Chicago Classification v3.0 for water-swallow-HRM; adapted criteria were used for rice-meal and 24-h-HRM. Patients were followed by chart review.

Contractility parameters obtained by different HRM procedures always correlated (R > 0.27, p < 0.05). During 24 h-measurements, all parameters showed circadian variability (p < 0.001). In comparison with water-swallow-HRM, rice-meal-HRM markedly increased the proportion of patients diagnosed with achalasia III, esophagogastric outlet obstruction with spastic features, distal esophageal spasm, or hypercontractility (10.7% vs. 21.3%, p = 0.039). The diagnostic gain regarding spastic and/or hypercontractile disorders was further increased by 24-h-HRM (61.3% of patients, p < 0.001). In 11 out of 21 patients with normal results in both water-swallow- and rice-meal-HRM (15% of total cohort), 24-h-HRM detected a major motor disorder. Results of 24-h-HRM altered treatment recommendations in 41 patients (54%).

24-h-HRM revealed spastic and/or hypercontractile esophageal motor disorders in about 60% of patients with NCCP/NOD and markedly improved diagnostic yield compared with standard HRM, probably partly due to the observed circadian variability of esophageal motility. 24-h-HRM findings frequently altered treatment recommendations, but the ultimate clinical consequences of the increased diagnostic yield have to be examined further.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a treatment for esophageal achalasia with 2 variations in myotomy depth: full-thickness myotomy (FTM) and circular myotomy (CM). This systematic review and meta-analysis compares the efficacy and safety of these variations.

Major health databases and registers, including Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane were searched systematically. The primary outcome was clinical success, while secondary outcomes included change in achalasia severity scores, post-POEM gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) measures, procedural time, and adverse events. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects models, with risk ratios (RR) and mean differences (MD) calculated for dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively.

Nine observational studies compared FTM and CM in 1,203 patients. FTM was performed in more severe achalasia and demonstrated similar clinical success to CM (RR 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.98-1.04; P=0.55; n=6) and procedural time (MD 3.49 min, 95%CI -2.79-9.78; P=0.28, I 2=66%; n=3). FTM was associated with increased post-POEM GERD outcomes, post-POEM pain (RR 1.94, 95%CI 1.27-2.95; P=0.002; n=2), and length of stay (LOS) (MD 0.85 days, 95%CI 0.11-1.59; P=0.02; I 2=0%; n=2); however, association with esophagitis disappeared when proton pump inhibitors use was accounted for (RR 1.68, 95%CI 0.89-3.16; P=0.11; I 2=23%; n=4). CM was associated with higher rates of subcutaneous emphysema (RR 0.59, 95%CI 0.43-0.81; P=0.001; n=5).

FTM and CM have comparable observed clinical efficacy and procedural time, with minimal differences in complications. FTM may be preferred in more severe achalasia and its association with post-POEM GERD may have been overestimated, but it may increase post-POEM pain and LOS.

Achalasia is an incurable condition of the esophagus involving the inflammation and degeneration of inhibitory neurons of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resulting in failure of the LES to relax. Typical symptoms of achalasia are dysphagia, retrosternal chest pain, regurgitation, and weight loss. Three studies are typically required for the diagnosis of achalasia: barium swallow, high-resolution esophageal manometry, and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Differential diagnosis includes gastroesophageal reflux disease, pseudoachalasia, neoplasm, and nonachalasia esophageal motility disorders such as scleroderma, jackhammer esophagus, distal esophageal spasm, and nutcracker esophagus.

There is no consensus on the definition of failure after treatment in patients with achalasia. The Eckardt score is used to define clinical outcomes. However, objective metrics are lacking. This study aimed to identify whether any high-resolution manometry (HRM) parameters may be useful in predicting a positive outcome after laparoscopic Heller-Dor (LHD).

Patients who underwent LHD between 2012 and 2022 were enrolled. The patients were divided according to the outcome: the success group (SG) and the failure group (FG). In addition to the common HRM parameters, we measured the difference between pre- and postoperative integrated relaxation pressures (∆-IRPs). A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the accuracy of each HRM parameter.

Of note, 336 patients (92.3%) were classified in the SG, and 28 patients (7.7%) were classified in the FG. No difference was found in terms of manometric types, symptom duration, and history of previous treatments. Preoperative lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and IRP were higher in the SG than in the FG (41 vs 35 mm Hg [P =.03] and 33 vs 26 mm Hg [P =.002], respectively). The postoperative LES metrics were similar between the 2 groups, except for the ∆-IRP that was higher in the SG (23 mm Hg [IQR, 15-31]) than in the FG (14 mm Hg [IQR, 9-17]) (P =.0002). In the univariate analysis, age, LES preoperative pressure, IRP, and ∆-IRP were factors able to predict a positive clinical outcome. In the multivariate analysis, the ∆-IRP was the only parameter independently related to clinical success (odds ratio, 0.94; 5%-95% CI, 0.89-0.99). The ROC curve for the ∆-IRP showed an area under the curve of 0.71, with a threshold value set at 16.5 mm Hg (sensibility of 71% and specificity of 70%).

Our data showed that the ∆-IRP with a threshold of 16.5 mm Hg could represent a new objective tool for predicting the long-term positive outcome of LHD in patients with esophageal achalasia.

High-resolution manometry (HRM) provides measures of esophageal function which are used to classify esophageal motility disorders based on the Chicago Classification system. Upper esophageal sphincter (UES) measures are obtained from HRM, but are not included in the classification system, rendering the relationship between UES measures and esophageal motility disorders unclear. Furthermore, changes in the acceptable amount of esophageal dysfunction between versions of this classification system has created controversy. The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between UES measures and esophageal function.

Cross-sectional study.

Referral centre.

HRM studies from the Calgary Gut Motility Center were reviewed for UES mean basal pressure, mean residual pressure, relaxation time-to-nadir, relaxation duration, and recovery time. Patients were grouped by number of failed swallows according to different iterations of the Chicago Classification: 0 to 4 (Group 1), 5 to 7 (Group 2), and 8 to 10 (Group 3).

2114 patients (65.1% female, median age 56 y) were included. There were significant increases in UES mean basal pressure (P < .001), mean residual pressure (P < .001), relaxation duration (P < .001), and recovery time (P < .001) between groups. Positive correlations existed between number of failed swallows and UES mean basal pressure (r = 0.143; P < .001), mean residual pressure (r = 0.201; P < .001), relaxation duration (r = 0.145; P < .001), and recovery time (r = 0.168; P < .001).

Differences in UES measures exist among patients with failed swallows, with a positive correlation between UES dysfunction and increasing dysmotility. Our findings illustrate that UES measures are closely related to esophageal function, and that even minor esophageal dysfunction is related to UES dysfunction.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has been a limiting factor with POEM. Sling-fiber preservation during POEM was reported to reduce postoperative GERD in Japan. This study investigates the efficacy of this technique in a western population. This is a retrospective, single-center study of patients undergoing POEM from October 2017 to January 2023. The initial cohort of patients were treated by conventional POEM, after which a second cohort underwent POEM with sling-fiber preservation. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. The secondary outcomes were clinical success rate (Eckardt score ≤ 3), procedure time, and adverse events rate. Multivariate regression was then performed to identify factors associated with the incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. One hundred and forty eight POEM cases (52.5 ± 15.6 y/o, female: 61[43%]) were included. The mean procedure time (108.6 ± 34.5 vs. 109.1 ± 45.7 min, P = 0.93) was similar between the groups. In the sling-fiber preservation group, gastric myotomy length was significantly longer (2.2 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.8 cm, P < 0.05), yet the incidence rate of postoperative reflux symptoms at follow-up was significantly lower (22.4% vs. 42.3%, P < 0.05). The clinical success rate was similar between groups (89.5% vs. 83.1%, P = 0.32), and the rate of adverse events requiring intervention (13.5% vs. 12.2%, P = 0.36) was similar. Regression analysis indicated that, after adjusting for other risk factors of postoperative GERD, sling-fiber preservation during POEM had an odds ratio of 0.24 (95% CI: 0.07-0.85, P < 0.05) for the incidence of reflux symptoms. Sling-fiber preservation during POEM reduces the incidence of postoperative reflux symptoms. As such, sling-fiber preservation may be a useful solution to reduce post-POEM GERD in western populations.

Internationally adopted Chicago Classification (CC) criteria based on adult normative data have been used to diagnose children with esophageal motility disorders undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM). The aim of this study was to compare HREM parameters of children without dysphagia and children with dysphagia and normal findings according to CC.

HREM metrics of 41 children (13.2 (9-18) years; 20 female) without dysphagia and 41 children (13.7 (8-18) years; 30 female) with dysphagia and normal diagnosis according to CC were compared. Analyzed data included resting and integrated relaxation pressures (IRP) of upper (UES) and lower (LES) esophageal sphincters, esophageal peristaltic contractile integrals, transition zone (TZ) gaps, distal latency (DL), and manometric esophageal length to height ratio (MELH). 95%ile normative cutoffs were calculated from the cohort without dysphagia.

Proximal contractile integral (PCI), UES and LES mean resting and IRP were not significantly different between the cohorts (p > 0.3). On the contrary, distal contractile integral (DCI), TZ gap and MELH were notably different with p = 0.0002, p = 0.027, and p = 0.033 respectively. According to 95%ile normative cutoffs of DCI, TZ gap and MELH, in cohort with dysphagia 27%, 15%, and 22% of patients respectively were not normal.

First study ever to compare HREM parameters of children without dysphagia to children with dysphagia. Considerable proportion of children with dysphagia may be underdiagnosed according to the adult criteria. This emphasizes the need for universally accepted child-specific diagnostic protocols and norms.

Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is an established treatment for achalasia, yet there is still a lack of technical standardization. No clear definition of 'long', 'standard', or 'short' POEM exists to date. We conducted a systematic review with meta-analysis to analyze current POEM length standards. We included studies reporting technical details of POEM, in which no definite or comparative myotomy length was intentionally adopted (standard myotomy). The primary outcome was the pooled mean total myotomy length. Sub-group analyses were performed to explore heterogeneity across studies. From the initial 7172 records, 31 studies with 3023 patients were included. Pooled mean of total myotomy length was 10.39 cm (95% CI 10.06-10.71; I2 99.3%). Pooled mean of esophageal and gastric myotomy length, provided by 17 studies, was 7.11 cm (95% CI 6.51-7.71; I2 99.8%) and 2.81 cm (95% CI 2.41-3-22; I2 99.8%), respectively. On subgroup analysis for achalasia subtypes, pooled mean length in non-spastic achalasia (type I and II) was 10.17 cm (95% CI 9.91-10.43; I2 94.2%), while in type III it was 14.02 cm (95% CI 10.59-17.44; I2 98.9%). Pooled mean myotomy length for studies conducted between 2014-2020 was 10.53 cm (95% CI, 10.22-10.84; I2 99.1%) and 9.74 cm (95% CI, 7.95-11.54; I2 99.7%) in 2021-2022. Myotomy length during a 'standard' POEM is 10.4 cm, remaining over 10 cm in non-spastic achalasia. The high heterogeneity across studies confirms that the POEM technique needs further standardization. We found no significant time trend towards adopting short POEM, despite recent evidence supporting its use.

Background Our aim was to assess the clinical presentation and outcomes of patients with a manometric diagnosis of esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) using standardized symptom surveys and comparison to a cohort who were referred for manometry but who had a normal study. Methods We followed a cohort of adult patients without a mechanical obstruction who underwent high-resolution manometry at our medical center from 9/12/19 to 10/4/21 for 16 months. Results Thirty-seven patients with EGJOO (age: 60.8 ± 13.3; female: 25/37) were compared to 33 patients with normal manometry (age: 57.6 ± 13.7; female: 21/33). For the untreated normal manometry group, there was a decrease in dysphagia scores at the six-month follow-up (10.8 ± 10.5 vs. 6.4 ± 10.4, P = 0.009) and a decrease in reflux scores at the 16-month follow-up (11.2 ± 3.0 vs. 7.8 ± 2.8, P = 0.042). For the untreated EGJOO group, there were no statistically significant changes in symptom scores. For both cohorts, dysphagia scores at the time of manometry had an inverse relationship with the change in dysphagia scores (EGJOO: r = -0.446, P = 0.033) (normal manometry: r = -0.464, P = 0.045). Conclusions Patients with EGJOO have a prognosis distinct from patients referred for manometry but who have a normal study and are likely to improve. However, even in patients with EGJOO, severe symptoms are likely to improve. Further investigation of therapies is warranted.

Decrease of esophageal mean nocturnal baseline impedance reflects loss of mucosal integrity. It can predict response to anti-reflux therapy. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance after transoral incisionless fundoplication for gastroesophageal reflux disease has never been assessed. The aim of the study is to investigate mean nocturnal baseline impedance and conventional pathophysiological parameters following transoral incisionless fundoplication.

Patients prospectively treated by transoral incisionless fundoplication in a single center were retrospectively reviewed regarding 1- and 2-year 24-hour pH-metry and multichannel intraluminal impedance with calculation of mean nocturnal baseline impedance, gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life and reflux symptom index scores.

Thirty-eight and 17/38 patients with 1- and 2-year 24-hour pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance assessment and mean nocturnal baseline impedance's calculation after transoral incisionless fundoplication, respectively, were identified. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance significantly increased up to 2-year follow-up (P = 0.033), along with significant decrease in % of acid exposure time (P = 0.003), gastroesophageal reflux disease-health related quality of life score (P < 0.001), and reflux symptom index (P = 0.008), compared with baseline. The longest orthostatic reflux decreased too, approaching statistical significance (P = 0.054). These significant changes occurred in patients experiencing ≥ 50% reduction of symptom questionnaires' scores ("responders"). Conversely, mean nocturnal baseline impedance worsened and no significant changes of 24-hour pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance metrics were observed in "non-responder" patients (symptom questionnaires' scores decrease < 50%).ConclusionIn patients who responded a significant improvement of mean nocturnal baseline impedance and % acid exposure time was observed up to 2-year follow-up, suggesting that transoral incisionless fundoplication achieves an effective esophageal mucosa healing besides symptom improvement.

Endoluminal Functional Lumen Imaging Probe (EndoFLIP) is a device that measures gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) distensibility. However, it is not demonstrated that GEJ distensibility increases proportionally with varying gastric myotomy length in peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). This study aimed to investigate the association between gastric myotomy length in POEM and intraoperative EndoFLIP findings.

This single-center, retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent POEM with intraoperative EndoFLIP from December 2019 to January 2023. Using EndoFLIP, minimal balloon diameter and its distensibility index (DI) were measured pre- and post-myotomy. Primary and secondary outcomes were the post-myotomy EndoFLIP findings at 30 ml and 40 ml volume fills.

The study included 44 patients (mean age 53.1 years, 50% female). Chicago classification included achalasia type I (39%), II (41%), III (9%), hypercontractile esophagus (2%), and EGJOO (9%). The mean esophageal myotomy length was 7.5 ± 2.2 cm and gastric myotomy was 2.1 ± 0.6 cm. Simple linear regression analyses indicated that for each 1 cm increase in gastric myotomy length, the DI at 30 ml volume fill was estimated to increase by 2.0 mm2/mmHg (p < 0.05, R2 = 0.41), the minimal diameter at 30 ml volume fill was estimated to increase by 2.4 mm (p < 0.05, R2 = 0.48), and the minimal diameter at 40 ml volume fill was estimated to increase by 1.3 mm (p < 0.05, R2 = 0.09).

This study demonstrates a significant linear relationship between gastric myotomy length and GEJ distensibility measured by EndoFLIP during POEM. These findings may be useful in clinical practice by enabling EndoFLIP to help calibrate a desired gastric myotomy length to achieve optimal DI and minimal diameter.

Background and Objectives: The threshold for ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) diagnosis was changed in Chicago v4.0. Our aim was to determine IEM prevalence using the new criteria and the differences between patients with definite IEM versus "inconclusive diagnosis". Materials and Methods: We retrospectively selected IEM and fragmented peristalsis (FP) patients from the high-resolution esophageal manometries (HREMs) database. Clinical, demographic data and manometric parameters were recorded. Results: Of 348 HREMs analyzed using Chicago v3.0, 12.3% of patients had IEM and 0.86% had FP. Using Chicago v4.0, 8.9% of patients had IEM (IEM-4 group). We compared them with the remaining 16 with an inconclusive diagnosis of IEM (borderline group). Dysphagia (77% vs. 44%, Z-test = 2.3, p = 0.02) and weight loss were more commonly observed in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. The reflux symptoms were more prevalent in the borderline group (87.5% vs. 70.9%, p = 0.2). Type 2 or 3 esophagogastric junction morphology was more prevalent in the borderline group (81.2%) vs. 64.5% in IEM-4 (p = 0.23). Distal contractile integral (DCI) was lower in IEM-4 vs. the borderline group, and resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure and mean integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) were similar. The number of ineffective swallows and failed swallows was higher in IEM-4 compared to the borderline group. Conclusions: Using Chicago v4.0, less than 10% of patients had a definite diagnosis of IEM. The dominant symptom was dysphagia. Only DCI and the number of failed and inefficient swallows were different between definite IEM patients and borderline cases.

In the last 3 decades, laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM) has represented the treatment of choice for esophageal achalasia, solving symptoms in most patients. Little is known about the fate of patients relapsing after LHM or their treatment. In this study, we aimed at evaluating the results of complementary pneumatic dilations (CPDs) after ineffective LHM.

We evaluated the patients who underwent LHM with Dor fundoplication (LHD) from 1992 to 2022 and were submitted to CPD for persistent or recurrent symptoms. The patients were followed clinically and with manometry, barium swallow, and endoscopy when necessary. An Eckardt score (ES) of > 3 was used as threshold for failure.

Of 1420 patients undergoing LHD, 120 (8.4%) were considered failures and were offered CPD. Ten patients refused further treatment; in 5 CPD was not indicated for severe esophagitis; 1 patient had surgery for a misshaped fundoplication and 1 patient developed cancer 2 years after LHD; that leaves 103 patients who underwent a median 2 CPDs (IQR, 1-3), at a median of 15 (IQR, 8-36) months after surgery, with 3.0- to 4.0-cm Rigiflex dilator (Boston Scientific, Massachusetts, USA). No perforations were recorded. Only 6 patients were lost to follow-up. Thus, 97 were followed for a median of 37 months (IQR, 6-112) after the last CPD: 70 (72%) were asymptomatic, whereas 27 (28%) had significant persistent dysphagia (ES > 3). The only differences between the 2 groups were the ES after surgery (P < .01) and the number of required CPD. Overall, the combination of LHD + CPD provided a satisfactory outcome in 96.5% of the patients.

CPDs represent an effective and safe option to treat patients after a failed LHD: when the postsurgery ES consistently remains high and the number of CPDs required to control symptoms exceeds 2, this may suggest the need for further invasive treatments.

Background/Objective: Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is often associated with dysphagia and esophageal dysmotility (ED). However, ED in patients with MSA is poorly understood. To assess the relationship between ED, dysphagia, and other clinical findings in such patients and investigate the details of ED in MSA using high-resolution manometry (HRM). Methods: Patients from The University of Tokyo Hospital with MSA who underwent swallowing examinations, esophagography, and HRM between 2017 and 2022 were enrolled. A retrospective chart review of patients' backgrounds, swallowing function, and esophageal motility was performed. ED was evaluated using the Chicago Classification version 4.0. Results: Seventy-four patients with MSA were identified. The median age was 64 years, 48 patients (65%) were male, and the cerebellar variant type was predominant (69%). Abnormal upper esophageal sphincter (UES) resting pressure was observed in 34 patients (46%) and intraesophageal stasis in 65 (88%). High-severity MSA was a risk factor for developing dysphagia, vocal fold movement impairment, and abnormal UES function (p < 0.05). However, no overt clinical risk factors for ED were identified. Various types of ED were detected using HRM, and ineffective esophageal motility was the most frequent disorder. Conclusions: ED is a common occurrence in patients with MSA. Although a high-severity MSA may be a risk factor for developing dysphagia and vocal fold motion impairment, ED can occur regardless of clinical severity. Since ED is rarely detected based on subjective symptoms, careful evaluation of esophageal motility by esophagography or HRM is warranted in patients with MSA.

Integrated Residual Pressure (IRP) measured under conditions alternative to supine single swallows may provide clinically useful information regarding EGJ relaxation. This study aimed to compare IRP values obtained under different situations and explore their potential clinical utility. We analyzed and compared the values of IRP obtained from healthy volunteers and patients with suspected achalasia during supine single swallows (Ssup-IRP), sitting single swallows (Ssit-IRP), supine multiple rapid swallows (Msup-IRP), and sitting multiple rapid swallows (Msit-IRP). We analyzed the HREM recordings of 40 healthy volunteers and 53 patients with suspected achalasia. The four metrics were significantly different from each other in healthy volunteers (Ssup-IRP > Msup-IRP > Ssit-IRP > Msit-IRP) and their corresponding 95th percentiles were substantially distinct (Ssup-IRP: 25.3 mmHg, Ssit-IRP: 20.9 mmHg, Msup-IRP: 15.9 mmHg, and Msit-IRP: 11.9 mm Hg, respectively). Complete agreement among the four metrics in predicting abnormal IRP was found in 39 of the 47 patients with suspected achalasia who completed the protocol. Optimal cutoffs derived from ROC curve analysis demonstrated ≥ 0.95 specificities for detection of impaired EGJ relaxation among patients with suspected achalasia. Among the eight patients with suspected achalasia with normal Ssup-IRP, five demonstrated abnormal Msit-IRP and four abnormal Ssit-IRP. Significant differences of IRP exist depending on the measurement situation, indicating that correct interpretation of IRP values requires specific cutoffs for each situation.The sensitivities of Ssit-IRP and Msit-IRP in detecting defective EGJ relaxation appear to be slightly higher than that of Ssup-IRP.

Non-achalasia oesophageal motility disorders (NAOMD) represent a heterogeneous group of rare diseases, including oesophagogastric junction outflow obstruction, distal oesophageal spasm, and hypercontractile oesophagus. Despite the differing aetiological, manometric and pathophysiological characteristics, these disorders are unified by similar clinical presentation, including dysphagia and chest pain. The management of these disorders remain a challenge for the clinician. Pharmacotherapy, botulinum toxin injection, endoscopic dilation, and laparoscopic Heller myotomy have been employed, with limited efficacy in the majority of patients. Currently, there are no controlled studies in literature that suggest which is the best management of these diseases. Since its introduction in clinical practice, PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) has emerged as a very promising, minimally invasive and effective treatment for oesophageal achalasia. No longer after the first uses, POEM has been successfully used also for the management of selected patients with NAOMD, However, currently available data are limited by small study sample sizes and short-term follow-up.

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) is the gold standard test for esophageal motility disorders. Nasopharyngeal airway-assisted insertion of the HREM catheter is a suggested salvage technique for failure from the inability to pass the catheter through the upper esophageal sphincter (UES). It has not been demonstrated that the nasopharyngeal airway improves procedural success rate.

Patients undergoing HREM between March 2019 and March 2023 were evaluated. Chart review was conducted for patient factors and procedural success rates before and after use of nasopharyngeal airway. Patients from March 2019 to May 2021 did not have nasopharyngeal airway available and were compared to patients from May 2021 to March 2023 who had the nasopharyngeal airway available.

In total, 523 HREM studies were conducted; 234 occurred prior to nasopharyngeal airway availability, and 289 occurred with nasopharyngeal airway availability. There was no difference in HREM catheter UES intubation rates between periods when a nasopharyngeal airway attempt was considered procedural failure (85% vs. 85%, p = 0.9). Nasopharyngeal airway use after UES intubation failure lead to improved UES intubation rates (94% vs. 85%, p < 0.01). Thirty-six patients that failed HREM catheter UES intubation had the procedure reattempted with a nasopharyngeal airway, 30 (83%) of which were successful. The nasopharyngeal airway assisted catheter UES intubation for failures attributed to nasal pain and hypersensitivity, gagging, coughing, and pharyngeal coiling.

Utilization of the nasopharyngeal airway increased rates of UES intubation. When HREM catheter placement through the UES fails, placement of a nasopharyngeal airway can be trialed to overcome patient procedural intolerance.

Epidemiological studies in achalasia and its clinical management in Australia are limited.

To determine the prevalence and trends in incidence rates and describe the types of treatment stratified by subtypes of achalasia.

A retrospective observational study was conducted at a single site that offers a state-wide high-resolution manometry (HRM) service in Western Australia (WA). Patients (aged ≥ 18 years) newly diagnosed with achalasia based on HRM findings between 2012 and 2021 were extracted from the HRM database. The crude incidence rate and age-standardised incidence rate (ASIR) along with the 2021-point prevalence were calculated. Trends were assessed by the Kendall τb test. The patients' initial and subsequent treatment modalities were described.

A total of 296 new cases were identified, and the median age at diagnosis was 56 years. The patient's median age, sex and year of the first treatment did not vary significantly with the subtypes. The lowest and highest ASIR (cases/100 000 person-years) were 0.8 in 2012 and 2.1 in 2021, respectively. Only type 2 achalasia showed a significant increasing trend (P = 0.009). The 2021-point prevalence was 16.9 cases/100 000 people and increased with age. Pneumatic balloon dilatation (PBD) was the most common treatment for types 1 and 2, while laparoscopic Heller myotomy was most common for type 3. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become common in the past 5 years.

The ASIR of type 2 achalasia significantly increased in WA. PBD was most commonly performed, although peroral endoscopic myotomy has recently increased as a preferred treatment option.

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder of unknown etiology. With the ageing of the general population, treatment in elderly patients has become increasingly common; however, the gold standard treatment in this population remains unclear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy (LHM) in geriatric patients.

In this study, consecutive achalasia patients undergoing LHM at the University Hospital 'Federico II' of Naples from November 2018 to November 2022 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups based on their age at intervention: elderly (≥70 years) and younger (<70 years). The two study groups were compared by minimizing the different distribution of covariates through a propensity score matching analysis (PSM).

In both populations, there was a significant improvement in terms of manometric parameters and symptoms after surgery. After applying one-on-one PSM, we obtained a total population of 48 achalasia patients divided into two groups (24 patients each). No significant differences were found in terms of demographic characteristics as well as preoperative and intraoperative variables between two groups. At 12 months from surgery, integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) was significantly lower in patients ≥ 70 years (p = 0.032), while younger patients scored significantly less at the post-operative Eckardt score (p = 0.047).

Laparoscopic Heller-Dor myotomy is a safe and effective treatment even in elderly patients with rapid post-operative recovery, improvement of symptoms and manometric parameters.

High-resolution manometry (HRM) facilitates the detailed evaluation of esophageal motility. In December 2020, Chicago classification (CC) version 4.0 introduced modifications to improve consistency and accuracy. We conducted this study to compare the differences in the interpretations of HRM examinations between CC 3.0 and 4.0. Consecutive HRM records at a Taiwan tertiary medical center, including wet swallows and MRS performed in both supine and sitting positions from October 2019 to May 2021, were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed using both CC versions 3.0 and 4.0. A total of 105 patients were enrolled, and 102 patients completed the exam, while three could not tolerate HRM sitting up. Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms (n = 65, 63.7%) and dysphagia (n = 37, 36.3%) were the main indications. A total of 18 patients (17.6%) were reclassified to new diagnoses using CC 4.0. Of the 11 patients initially diagnosed with absent contractility, 3 (27.3%) were reclassified as having Type 1 achalasia. Of the 18 patients initially diagnosed with IEM, 6 (33.3%) were reclassified as normal. The incidence of diagnosis changes was similar in both the dysphagia and refractory GERD symptoms groups (21.6% versus 15.3%, p = 0.43). The use of CC 4.0 led to changes in the diagnoses of esophageal motility disease, irrespective of examination indications. Early adoption improves the accuracy of diagnoses and affects patient management.

Per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has become an accepted minimally invasive alternative to Heller myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and other disorders of esophageal dysmotility. One associated adverse event is the inadvertent creation of capnoperitoneum. A proposed mechanism is that extension of the submucosal tunnel below the esophageal hiatus and onto the gastric wall leads to transmural perforation. We hypothesized that the use of impedance planimetry with the endoscopic functional luminal imaging probe (EndoFLIP) more accurately identifies the esophagogastric junction and helps to better define the myotomy's ideal limits, thus lowering the incidence of inadvertent capnoperitoneum.

This is a single-center, retrospective review of consecutive POEM cases from 06/11/2011 to 08/08/2022, with EndoFLIP introduced in 2017. Patient and procedural characteristics, including the incidence of clinically significant capnoperitoneum and decompression, were analyzed using univariate and multivariable linear regression statistics.

There were 140 POEM cases identified, 74 (52.9%) of which used EndoFLIP. Clinically significant capnoperitoneum was encountered in 26 (18.6%) cases, with no differences in patient characteristics between those who had capnoperitoneum and those who did not. There was a decreased incidence of capnoperitoneum in cases using EndoFLIP compared to those without (n = 6, 23% vs n = 20, 77%, p = 0.001), with zero instances in the final 56 cases. After adjusting for potentially confounding factors, EndoFLIP use was associated with a - 15.93% (95% confidence interval - 30.68%, - 1.18%) decrease in procedure duration.

The routine use of EndoFLIP during POEM was associated with decreased incidence of clinically significant capnoperitoneum, potentially due to improved myotomy tailoring and decreased duration of insufflation with shorter procedure times.

Achalasia is a rare esophageal motility disorder characterized by abnormal esophageal peristalsis and the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter to relax, resulting in poor esophageal emptying. This can be relieved by endoscopic and surgical treatments; each comes with certain advantages and disadvantages.

This review aims to guide the clinician in clinical decision making on the different treatment options for achalasia regarding the efficacy, safety, and important predictors.

Botulinum toxin injection is only recommended for a selective group of achalasia patients because of the short term effect. Pneumatic dilation improves achalasia symptoms, but this effect diminishes over time and requiring repeated dilations to maintain clinical effect. Heller myotomy combined with fundoplication and peroral endoscopic myotomy are highly effective on the long term but are more invasive than dilations. Gastro-esophageal reflux complaints are more often encountered after peroral endoscopic myotomy. Patient factors such as age, comorbidities, and type of achalasia must be taken into account when choosing a treatment. The preference of the patient is also of great importance and therefore shared decision making has to play a fundamental role in deciding about treatment.

Addressing dysphagia is vital due to its prevalence and impact on healthcare expenditure. While high resolution manometry (HRM) effectively evaluates esophageal dysphagia, its role in oropharyngeal dysphagia and upper esophageal sphincter (UES) dysfunction remains debated. The fourth iteration of the Chicago classification (CC) offers an algorithmic approach for diagnosing abnormal motor patterns via HRM. This review assesses the CC's impact on dysphagia management.

The Chicago classification version 4.0 emphasizes auxiliary and provocative techniques when the algorithm falls short of a conclusive diagnosis. It introduces stricter criteria for previously ambiguous conditions like ineffective motility and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction. This version also introduces the concept of conclusive and inconclusive classifications based on symptoms, provocation maneuvers, and supportive testing minimizing ambiguity.

The Chicago classification v4.0 remains a useful tool for the diagnosis of well characterized esophageal motility disorders. However, major limitations include reliance on HRM and a focus on distal esophagus contractile characteristics without considering proximal esophagus or upper esophageal sphincter, both of which can sometimes be the only evident abnormality in patients with dysphagia. Despite efforts to reduce ambiguity, diagnostic challenges persist. These limitations can be addressed in future updates.

Esophageal motility disorders are diseases in which there are malfunctions of the act of swallowing due to a change in neuromuscular structures. The main symptom is therefore dysphagia for solid and/or liquid foods, often accompanied by symptoms such as chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn, and weight loss. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard in diagnostics. Endoscopy and radiology serve to exclude inflammatory or malignant changes. With the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders has improved and led to a new classification with the Chicago Classification, which has been modified several times in the last decade, most recently in 2021 with the Chicago Classification v4.0. Compared to the previous version 3.0, there are some important changes that are presented based on the most important esophageal motility disorders in everyday clinical practice.

Achalasia is a rare disease with significant diagnostic delay and association with false diagnoses and unnecessary interventions. It remains unclear, whether atypical presentations, misinterpreted symptoms or inconclusive diagnostics are the cause. The aim of this study was the characterization of typical and atypical features of achalasia and their impact on delays, misinterpretations or false diagnoses. A retrospective analysis of prospective database over a period of 30 years was performed. Data about symptoms, delays and false diagnoses were obtained and correlated with manometric, endoscopic and radiologic findings. Totally, 300 patients with achalasia were included. Typical symptoms (dysphagia, regurgitation, weight loss and retrosternal pain) were present in 98.7%, 88%, 58.4% and 52.4%. The mean diagnostic delay was 4.7 years. Atypical symptoms were found in 61.7% and led to a delay of 6 months. Atypical gastrointestinal symptoms were common (43%), mostly 'heartburn' (16.3%), 'vomiting' (15.3%) or belching (7.7%). A single false diagnosis occurred in 26%, multiple in 16%. Major gastrointestinal misdiagnoses were GERD in 16.7% and eosinophilic esophagitis in 4%. Other false diagnosis affected ENT-, psychiatric, neurologic, cardiologic or thyroid diseases. Pitfalls were the description of 'heartburn' or 'nausea'. Tertiary contractions at barium swallows, hiatal hernias and 'reflux-like' changes at endoscopy or eosinophils in the biopsies were misleading. Atypical symptoms are common in achalasia, but they are not the sole source for diagnostic delays. Misleading descriptions of typical symptoms or misinterpretation of diagnostic studies contribute to false diagnoses and delays.

Esophageal motor disorders are an important cause of dysphagia but can also be associated with retrosternal pain and heartburn as well as regurgitation. In extreme cases, patients are not able to eat appropriately and lose weight. Repetitive aspiration can occur and may cause pulmonological complications. Achalasia represents the most important and best-defined esophageal motor disorder and is characterized by insufficient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter in combination with typical disturbances of esophageal peristalsis. Additional defined motor disorders are distal esophageal spasm, hypercontractile esophagus, absent contractility and ineffective peristalsis. Patients with appropriate symptoms should primarily undergo esophagogastroduodenoscopy for exclusion of e.g., tumors and esophagitis. Esophageal high-resolution manometry is the reference method for diagnosis and characterization of motor disorders in non-obstructive dysphagia. An esophagogram with barium swallow may deliver complementary information or may be used if manometry is not available. Balloon dilatation and Heller myotomy are long established and more or less equally effective therapeutic options for patients with achalasia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) enhances the therapeutic armamentarium for achalasia and hypertensive/spastic motor disorders since 2010. For hypotensive motor disorders, which may occur as a complication of e.g., rheumatological diseases or idiopathically, therapeutic options are still limited.

Idiopathic achalasia is a common and well-recognized primary esophageal motility disorder with unknown etiology and is characterized by the abnormality of esophageal body peristalsis associated with an impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The aim of this study is to explore the correlation between Helicobacter pylori and idiopathic achalasia.

This study was conducted on 700 patients, with dysphagia, regurgitation, and non-cardiac chest pain (NCCP), who met our inclusion criteria. The mean ± SD age was 39.8 ± 11 (13-80 years), and 60% (420) of the participants were female. Of the participants, 108 had idiopathic achalasia and 105 were normal participants who were placed in the case and control groups, respectively. They were enrolled in the study based on high-resolution manometry. H. pylori was confirmed by a histological study. In the biopsy, specimens were taken by esophagogastroduodenoscopy.

Our results revealed that 71.3% and 45% of the participants were H. Pylori positive in the case and control groups, respectively. The odds ratio (OR) was 3.3 (95% CI: 1.80-5.99, P < 0.05), indicating a statistically significant association between H. Pylori infection and the group classification. The dominant presenting symptoms in achalasia were dysphagia (97.2%) and NCCP (80.5%), but regurgitation (65.7%) was a dominant symptom in the normal participants.

Diverse autoimmune and apoptotic phenomena induced by H. Pylori influence the pathogenesis of idiopathic achalasia, suggesting an underlying link between H. Pylori infection and idiopathic achalasia. This correlation should be confirmed by other clinical and experimental studies.

Esophageal motility disorders (EMDs) are caused by the impaired relaxation of the upper/lower esophageal sphincter and/or defective esophageal peristaltic contractions, resulting in dysphagia and noncardiac chest pain. High-resolution manometry (HRM) is essential for the diagnosis of primary EMD; however, the recognition of EMD and HRM by general practitioners in Japan is limited. This review summarizes the diagnosis of and treatment strategies for EMD.

HRM is a specific test for the diagnosis of EMD, whereas endoscopy and barium swallow as screening tests provide characteristic findings (i.e., esophageal rosette and bird's beak sign) in some cases. It is important to note that manometric diagnoses apart from achalasia are often clinically irrelevant; therefore, the recently updated guidelines suggest additional manometric maneuvers, such as the rapid drink challenge, and further testing, including functional lumen imaging, for a more accurate diagnosis before invasive treatment. Endoscopic/surgical myotomy, pneumatic dilation, and botulinum toxin injections need to be considered for patients with achalasia and clinically relevant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction.

Since the detailed pathophysiology of EMD remains unclear, their diagnosis needs to be cautiously established prior to the initiation of invasive treatment.

A novel treatment method for achalasia of the esophagus and related disorders is known as peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM). This study aimed to calculate the resting energy expenditure (REE) and evaluated the degree of physical invasiveness based on metabolic changes during the perioperative period of POEM. Fifty-eight patients who underwent POEM were prospectively enrolled; REE, body weight (BW), and basal energy expenditure were measured on the day of POEM, postoperative day 1 (POD 1), and three days after POEM (POD 3). The median REE/BW increased from 19.6 kcal/kg on the day of POEM to 24.5 kcal/kg on POD 1. On POD 3, it remained elevated at 20.9 kcal/kg. The stress factor on POD 1 was 1.20. Among the factors, including the Eckardt score, operation time, and the length of myotomy, the length of myotomy was associated with changes in REE/BW. During the perioperative period of POEM, the level of variation in energy expenditure was lower than that of esophageal cancer surgeries performed under general anesthesia. However, because the length of myotomy is a factor affecting changes in energy expenditure, careful perioperative management is desirable for patients with longer myotomy lengths.

High-resolution manometry (HRM) and functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) are primary and/or complementary diagnostic tools for the evaluation of esophageal motility. We aimed to assess the interrater agreement and accuracy of HRM and FLIP interpretations.

Esophageal motility specialists from multiple institutions completed the interpretation of 40 consecutive HRM and 40 FLIP studies. Interrater agreement was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) for continuous variables and Fleiss' κ statistics for nominal variables. Accuracies of rater interpretation were assessed using the consensus of 3 experienced raters as the reference standard.

Fifteen raters completed the HRM and FLIP studies. An excellent interrater agreement was seen in supine median integral relaxation pressure (ICC 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.95-0.98), and a good agreement was seen with the assessment of esophagogastric junction (EGJ) outflow, peristalsis, and assignment of a Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis using HRM (κ = 0.71, 0.75, and 0.70, respectively). An excellent interrater agreement for EGJ distensibility index and maximum diameter (0.91 [0.90-0.94], 0.92 [0.89-0.95]) was seen, and a moderate-to-good agreement was seen in the assignment of EGJ opening classification, contractile response pattern, and motility classification (κ = 0.68, 0.56, and 0.59, respectively) on FLIP. Rater accuracy for Chicago Classification version 4.0 diagnosis on HRM was 82% (95% confidence interval 78%-84%) and for motility diagnosis on FLIP Panometry was 78% (95% confidence interval 72%-81%).

Our study demonstrates high levels of interrater agreement and accuracy in the interpretation of HRM and FLIP metrics and moderate-to-high levels for motility classification in FLIP, supporting the use of these approaches for primary or complementary evaluation of esophageal motility disorders.

The aim of our study was to compare the results of endoscopy and manometry with regard to the presence and longitudinal size of hiatal hernias using a cohort of patients with PPI-refractory reflux symptoms. In addition, we aimed to investigate the clinical relevance of hiatal hernias and their size in relation to the occurrence of GERD.

Five hundred patients with suspected GERD due to typical reflux symptoms (heartburn and regurgitation) and inadequate response to PPI therapy underwent standardized screening at a reflux center. After 2 weeks of PPI withdrawal, all patients underwent endoscopy, 24-h pH impedance measurement, and high-resolution manometry (HRM). Both endoscopy and HRM results were available for 487 patients.

There was a high correlation between the endoscopic and manometric measured longitudinal size of hernias (rho = .768 (p < .001)). Absolute differences differ on a small effect basis (Cohen's d = 0.23). The presence of hernias increases significantly with the severity of GERD, regardless of whether the hernia was diagnosed by endoscopy or manometry.

In summary, endoscopically and manometrically measured hiatal hernia size are highly significantly correlated. Patients with refractory reflux symptoms and a hernia size of 4 cm are very likely to have GERD. In the future, this finding could greatly simplify the diagnosis of GERD.

Relieving esophagogastric junction (EGJ) obstruction has been the focus of treatment for achalasia cardia. The recovery of peristalsis has been an elusive goal. Studies analyzing post-intervention peristaltic recovery have several limitations such as the use of conventional manometry or lack of standard definitions of peristalsis. Accordingly, we undertook this study to analyze frequency and pattern of peristaltic recovery following treatment for achalasia cardia on high-resolution manometry (HRM) and standard Chicago definition of peristalsis.

Pre and post-intervention HRM records of 71 treatment-naive patients diagnosed as achalasia cardia were retrospectively analyzed. Records with pre and post-intervention HRM on different systems (e.g. solid state and water perfusion) and those with inadequate information were excluded. All HRMs were interpreted as per Chicago classification version 3.0. After pneumatic dilation (PD) or laparoscopic Heller's myotomy (LHM), pseudorecovery of peristalsis was defined as any contraction at least 3 cm in length along 20 mmHg isobaric contour with a distal latency of less than 4.5 seconds. True recovery and premature contractions were defined by standard Chicago classification v3.0 criteria.

Change in diagnosis was observed in 38 of 71 (53.5%) patients after intervention. While pseudo-peristaltic recovery occurred in 11 of 71 (15.5%) patients, only three (4.2%) had a true recovery. Another nine (12.7%) patients showed new premature contractions.

True peristaltic recovery is uncommon in achalasia cardia following intervention, particularly PD. Pseudo-peristaltic recovery is more common. Further research is warranted on this issue.

The solid test meal (STM) is a challenge test that is done during esophageal manometry and appears to increase the diagnostic yield of the study. The aim of our analysis was to establish the normal values for STM and evaluate its clinical utility in a group of Latin American patients with esophageal disorders versus healthy controls.

A cross-sectional study was conducted on a group of healthy controls and consecutive patients that underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry, in which STM was done at the final part of the study and consisted of asking the subjects to eat 200 g of precooked rice. The results were compared during the conventional protocol and the STM.

Twenty-five controls and 93 patients were evaluated. The majority of the controls (92%) completed the test in under 8 min. The STM changed the manometric diagnosis in 38% of the cases. The STM diagnosed 21% more major motor disorders than the conventional protocol; it doubled the cases of esophageal spasm and quadrupled the cases of jackhammer esophagus, whereas it demonstrated normal esophageal peristalsis in 43% of the cases with a previous diagnosis of ineffective esophageal motility.

Our study confirms the fact that complementary STM during esophageal manometry adds information and enables a more physiologic assessment of esophageal motor function to be made, compared with liquid swallows, in patients with esophageal motor disorders.

Panesophageal pressurization (PEP) defines type II achalasia on high-resolution-manometry (HRM) but some patients exhibit spasm after treatment. The Chicago Classification (CC) v4.0 proposed high PEP values as predictor of embedded spasm, yet supportive evidence is lacking.

Fifty seven type II achalasia patients (47 ± 18 years, 54% males) with HRM and LIP Panometry before and after treatment were retrospectively identified. Baseline HRM and FLIP studies were analyzed to identify factors associated with post-treatment spasm, defined on HRM per CC v4.0.

Seven patients (12%) had spasm following treatment (peroral endoscopic myotomy 47%; pneumatic dilation [PD] 37%; laparoscopic Heller myotomy 16%). At baseline, greater median maximum PEP pressure (MaxPEP) values on HRM (77 vs 55 mmHg, p = 0.045) and spastic-reactive contractile response pattern on FLIP (43% vs 8%, p = 0.033) were more common in patients with post-treatment spasm while absent contractile response on FLIP was more common in patients without spasm (14% vs 66%, p = 0.014). The strongest predictor of post-treatment spasm was the percentage of swallows with MaxPEP ≥70 mmHg (best cut-off: ≥30%), with AUROC of 0.78. A combination of MaxPEP <70 mmHg and FLIP 60 mL pressure < 40 mmHg identified patients with lower rates of post-treatment spasm (3% overall, 0% post-PD) compared to those with values above these thresholds (33% overall, 83% post-PD).

High maximum PEP values, high FLIP 60 mL pressures and contractile response pattern on FLIP Panometry prior to treatment identified type II achalasia patients more likely to exhibit post-treatment spasm. Evaluating these features may guide personalized patient management.

The concept of third space endoscopy first described in 2007, was adapted and performed in humans in 2010 by Inoue et al. in a group of patients with esophageal achalasia (EA). Since then, esophageal endoscopic myotomy (E-POEM), has been performed in more than 10,000 patients worldwide up to now. Safety and efficacy have been confirmed at early, mid and long-term evaluations, in different gastrointestinal diseases including achalasia, refractory gastroparesis, and other esophageal motility disorders (EMD). Nowadays, this treatment has shown to be not only an excellent option, but also with its excellent outcomes, the first option in certain clinical scenarios such as type III achalasia. Thus, the minimal invasive nature of POEM gives us multiple advantages compared with the classical treatments that includes pneumatic dilation (PD) and laparoscopic Heller myotomy (LHM), including not only clinical aspects but also economical. High resolution manometry (HRM) has substantially redefined the actual approach of esophageal motility disorders with the major changes in instrumental use, diagnostic algorithms, and therapeutics. The previous Chicago's classification V 3.0 clearly improved our knowledge about pathophysiology of spastic esophageal motor disorders, however, with its recent update (Chicago V 4.0), multiple changes in diagnosis and treatment are expected. In the present article, we aimed to review and analyze the most important aspects about the results of E-POEM in the management of EMD according to the view of the new Chicago's classification V 4.0.

Hypercontractile esophagus with concomitant esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO) is a rare entity that is characterized by both esophageal hypercontractility and lack of relaxation of the EGJ. The clinical characteristics of these patients are not well-described and there is no strict recommendation regarding the treatment of this condition. We report four cases of patients with hypercontractile esophagus and concomitant to EGJOO. All patients underwent upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) and barium swallow and met the criteria of Chicago Classification for both EGJOO and hypercontractile esophagus. Patients were followed up to four years from diagnosis and clinical symptoms were recorded. Four patients, who underwent evaluation for dysphagia, were found to have both EGJOO and hypercontractile esophagus on HRM. Two of them had mild symptoms and did not undergo treatment with no progression of symptoms on follow-up. Of the two patients who underwent treatment, one had botulinum toxin injection to the EGJ via upper GI endoscopy and one underwent per-oral endoscopic myotomy. Symptoms in both patients improved. Patients with concomitant hypercontractile esophagus and EGJOO present with varying degrees of symptoms and the treatment approach should be personalized according to the degree of symptoms and general clinical condition.

Esophagogastric junction contractile integral (EGJ-CI) has not come into routine use due to methodological discrepancies and its unclear clinical utility. We aimed to determine which method of calculating EGJ-CI was best at discriminating between common reflux disease states.

High-resolution manometry (HRM) and pH-Impedance measurements were acquired for 100 patients; 25 Barrett's esophagus (>3 cm/acid exposure time (AET) > 6), 25 endoscopy-negative reflux disease (ENRD; AET >6), 25 borderline reflux (AET 4-6), 25 functional heartburn (FH; AET <4), constituting the developmental cohort. EGJ-CI was calculated at 20 mmHg, 2 mmHg, and 0 mmHg isobaric contour. Empirical associations, univariable, multivariable and ROC analyses were performed between EGJ-CI and manometric/pH-impedance metrics. A validation cohort (n = 25) was used to test the new EGJ-CI cutoff.

Significant correlations with AET were observed when EGJ-CI was calculated with an isobaric threshold of 20 mmHg (p < 0.001). Significant differences in EGJ-CI were observed between patients with FH and Barrett's esophagus (p = 0.004) and with ENRD (p = 0.01); however, LES basal pressure was unable to differentiate between these disease states (p = 0.09, p = 0.25, respectively). ROC analysis on the developmental cohort found that EGJ-CI 21.2 mmHg.cm demonstrated sensitivity 72% and specificity 72% between patients with reflux (Barrett's esophagus/ENRD) and FH. In the validation cohort, 92.8% with a low EGJ-CI had good/moderate improvement in symptoms following therapy compared to 54.5% with raised EGJ-CI (p = 0.026).

This study re-affirms EGJ-CI as a reliable discriminator between reflux disease (Barrett's esophagus/ENRD) and FH. In borderline reflux patients, patients with a lower EGJ-CI score (<21.2 mmHg) appear to respond better to anti-reflux therapies compared to those with a higher value.

Achalasia is a rare disease of the esophagus with impaired relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter and aperistalsis. The etiology is unknown but speculations include a viral or autoimmune etiology. All specialists dealing with swallowing and esophageal diseases should recognize the classic symptoms of dysphagia for solids/liquids, regurgitation, and choking, especially at night. High-resolution manometry is critical for the diagnosis with endoscopy and barium esophagram having a supportive role. The disease cannot be cured but most can return to near normal swallowing and a regular diet with appropriate therapy. Treatment includes smooth muscle relaxants, botulinum toxin injections to the lower sphincter, pneumatic dilation, Heller myotomy, and peroral endoscopic myotomy. One treatment does not fit all and a tailored approach through a multidiscipline team will give the best long-term outcomes.

To evaluate and characterize outcomes of MSA in patients with IEM.

MSA improves patients with gastroesophageal reflux and normal motility. However, many patients have IEM, which could impact the outcomes of MSA and discourage use.

An international, multi-institutional case control study of IEM patients undergoing MSA matched to normal patients was performed. Primary outcomes were new onset dysphagia and need for postoperative interventions.

A total of 105 IEM patients underwent MSA with matching controls. At 1 year after MSA: GERD-Health Related Quality of Life was similar; DeMeester scores in IEM patients improved to 15.7 and 8.5 in controls ( P = 0.021); and normalization of the DeMeester score for IEM = 61.7% and controls = 73.1% ( P = 0.079).In IEM patients, 10/12 (83%) with preop dysphagia had resolution; 11/66 (17%) had new onset dysphagia and 55/66 (83%) never had dysphagia. Comparatively, in non-IEM patients, 22/24 (92%) had dysphagia resolve; 2/24 (8%) had persistent dysphagia; 7/69 (10%) had new onset dysphagia, and 62/69 (90%) never had dysphagia.Overall, 19 (18%) IEM patients were dilated after MSA, whereas 12 (11%) non-IEM patients underwent dilation ( P = 0.151). Nine (9%) patients in both groups had their device explanted.

Patients with IEM undergoing MSA demonstrate improved quality of life and reduction in acid exposure. Key differences in IEM patients include lower rates of objective GERD resolution, lower resolution of existing dysphagia, higher rates of new onset dysphagia and need for dilation. GERD patients with IEM should be counselled about these possibilities.

High-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM) utilizes sufficient pressure sensors such that intraluminal pressure is monitored as a continuum along luminal length, similar to time viewed as a continuum on polygraph tracings in 'conventional' manometry. When HRM is coupled with pressure topography plotting, and pressure amplitude is transformed into spectral colors with isobaric areas indicated by same-colored regions, "Clouse plots" are generated. HRM has several advantages compared to the technology that it replaced: (1) the contractility of the entire esophagus can be viewed simultaneously in a uniform standardized format, (2) standardized objective metrics of peristaltic and sphincter function can be systematically applied for interpretation, and (3) topographic patterns of contractility are more easily recognized with greater reproducibility. Leveraging these advantages led to the current standard for the interpretation of clinical esophageal HRM studies, the Chicago Classification (CC), now in its fourth iteration. Compared to conventional manometry, HRM has vastly improved the sensitivity for detecting achalasia, largely due to the objectivity and accuracy of identification of impaired esophagogastric junction (EGJ) relaxation. Additionally, it has led to the subcategorization of achalasia into three clinically relevant subtypes, differentiated by the contractile function of the esophageal body, and identified an additional disorder of EGJ outflow obstruction wherein esophageal peristalsis is preserved. Headway has also been made in understanding hypocontractile and hypercontractile conditions. In summary, HRM and the CC process have revolutionized our understanding of esophageal motility and motility disorders. Moving forward, there will always be remaining challenges, but we now have the tools to meet them.

Esophageal motility disorders are diseases in which there are malfunctions of the act of swallowing due to a change in neuromuscular structures. The main symptom is therefore dysphagia for solid and/or liquid foods, often accompanied by symptoms such as chest pain, regurgitation, heartburn, and weight loss. Esophageal manometry is the gold standard in diagnostics. Endoscopy and radiology serve to exclude inflammatory or malignant changes. With the introduction of high-resolution esophageal manometry (HRM), the diagnosis of esophageal motility disorders has improved and led to a new classification with the Chicago Classification, which has been modified several times in the last decade, most recently in 2021 with the Chicago Classification v4.0. Compared to the previous version 3.0, there are some important changes that are presented based on the most important esophageal motility disorders in everyday clinical practice.