Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) are characterized by the destruction of the small bile ducts and the formation of multifocal biliary strictures, respectively, impairing bile flow. This leads to the hepatic accumulation of bile acids, causing liver injury and the risk of progression to cirrhosis and liver failure. First-line therapy for PBC is ursodeoxycholic acid, although up to 40% of treated individuals are incomplete responders, and there is no effective therapy for PSC, highlighting the need for better therapeutic options in these diseases. In addition, pruritus is a common symptom of cholestasis that has severe consequences for quality of life and is often undertreated or untreated. Nuclear receptors are pharmacological targets to treat cholestasis due to their multifactorial regulation of hepatic enzymatic pathways, particularly in bile acid metabolism. The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) is of significant clinical interest due to its role in regulating bile acid synthesis and detoxification pathways. PPAR agonism by fibrates has traditionally been explored due to PPARα's expression in the liver; however, recent interest has expanded to focus on newer PPAR agonists that activate other PPAR isoforms, for example, δ, γ, alone or in combination. Several PPAR agonists have been investigated as second-line therapy for people living with PBC, including the recent accelerated United States Food and Drug Administration approval of elafibranor and seladelpar. This review evaluates available data on the efficacy and safety of the five PPAR agonists investigated for the treatment of cholestasis and associated pruritus in PBC and PSC, namely fenofibrate, bezafibrate, saroglitazar, elafibranor, and seladelpar.

Cardiac fibrosis occurs in a wide range of cardiac diseases and is characterised by the transdifferentiation of cardiac fibroblasts into myofibroblasts these cells produce large quantities of extracellular matrix, resulting in myocardial scar. The profibrotic process is multi-factorial, meaning identification of effective treatments has been limited. The antifibrotic effect of the bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is established in cases of liver fibrosis however its mechanism and role in cardiac fibrosis is less well understood.

In this study, we used cellular models of cardiac fibrosis and living myocardial slices to characterise the macroscopic and cellular responses of the myocardium to UDCA treatment. We complemented this approach by conducting RNA-seq on cardiac fibroblasts isolated from dilated cardiomyopathy patients. This allowed us to gain insights into the mechanism of action and explore whether the IL-11 and TGFβ/WWP2 profibrotic networks are influenced by UDCA. Finally, we used fibroblasts from a TGR5 KO mouse to confirm the mechanism of action.

We found that UDCA reduced myofibroblast markers in rat and human fibroblasts and in living myocardial slices, indicating its antifibrotic action. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the treatment of UDCA successfully reversed the profibrotic IL-11 and TGFβ/WWP2 gene networks. We also show that TGR5 is the most highly expressed UDCA receptor in cardiac fibroblasts. Utilising cells isolated from a TGR5 knock-out mouse, we identified that the antifibrotic effect of UDCA is attenuated in the KO fibroblasts. This study combines cellular studies with RNA-seq and state-of-the-art living myocardial slices to offer new perspectives on cardiac fibrosis. Our data confirm that TGR5 agonists, such as UDCA, offer a unique pathway of action for the treatment of cardiac fibrosis. Medicines for cardiac fibrosis have been slow to clinic and have the potential to be used in the treatment of multiple cardiac diseases. UDCA is well tolerated in the treatment of other diseases, indicating it is an excellent candidate for further in-human trials.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an enigmatic, autoimmune disease targeting the small intralobular bile ducts resulting in cholestasis and potentially progression to biliary cirrhosis. Primarily affecting middle-aged women, the diagnosis of PBC is typically straightforward, with most patients presenting with cholestatic liver tests and the highly specific antimitochondrial antibody. For decades, the foundational treatment of PBC has been ursodeoxycholic acid, which delays disease progression in most patients but has no impact on PBC symptoms. Large cohort studies of patients with PBC have established the benefit of maximizing the reduction in serum alkaline phosphatase levels with ursodeoxycholic acid and the need to add second-line agents in patients who do not achieve an adequate response. Advances in the understanding of bile acid physiology have led to the development of new agents that improve cholestasis in patients with PBC and are predicted to reduce the risk of disease progression. Obeticholic acid, the first second-line therapy to be approved for PBC, significantly improves liver biochemistries and has been associated with improved long-term clinical outcomes but is limited by its propensity to induce pruritus. Elafibranor and seladelpar are peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists recently approved for use in patients with PBC, whereas bezafibrate and fenofibrate are available as off-label therapies. They also have shown biochemical improvements among patients with an inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid but may improve symptoms of pruritus. Herein, we review the patient features to consider when deciding whether a second-line agent is indicated and which agent to consider for a truly personalized approach to PBC patient care.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease. The management landscape was transformed 20 years ago with the advent of ursodeoxycholic acid. Up to 40% of patients do not, however, respond adequately to ursodeoxycholic acid and therefore still remain at risk of disease progression to cirrhosis. The introduction of obeticholic acid as a second-line therapy for patients failing ursodeoxycholic acid has improved outcomes for patients with PBC. There remains, however, a need for better treatment for patients at higher risk. The greatest threat facing our efforts to improve treatment in PBC is, paradoxically, the regulatory approval model providing conditional marketing authorization for new drugs based on biochemical markers on the condition that long-term, randomized placebo-controlled outcome trials are performed to confirm efficacy. As demonstrated by the COBALT confirmatory study with obeticholic acid, it is difficult to retain patients in the required follow-on confirmatory placebo-controlled PBC outcome trials when a licensed drug is commercially available. New PBC therapies in development, such as the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, face even greater challenges in demonstrating outcome benefit through randomized placebo-controlled studies once following conditional marketing authorization, as there will be even more treatment options available. A recently published EMA Reflection Paper provides some guidance on the regulatory pathway to full approval but fails to recognize the importance of real-world data in providing evidence of outcome benefit in rare diseases. Here we explore the impact of the EMA reflection paper on PBC therapy and offer pragmatic solutions for generating evidence of long-term outcomes through real-world data collection.

In primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), approximately 40% of the patients respond incompletely to first-line treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), resulting in a poorer prognosis. Although obeticholic acid (OCA) is approved as a second-line therapy, it is not well-tolerated by patients with significant itching or advanced cirrhosis. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonists, including fibrates traditionally known as antihyperlipidemic agents, have emerged as potent alternatives for treating PBC patients with an incomplete response to UDCA.

This article provides a detailed overview of the mechanisms of PPAR agonists and evaluates their efficacy and adverse events, focusing on findings from recent phase III clinical trials.

PPAR agonists are significant alternatives in the treatment of PBC, showing the potential to enhance biochemical responses, reduce mortality, and alleviate pruritus. Long-term outcomes for PBC patients, particularly those with advanced disease, and longitudinal data on the antipruritic effects of PPAR agonists require further investigation. Combining PPAR agonists with other treatments and advancing personalized approaches may enhance therapeutic efficacy and patient outcomes. This study provides future perspectives on the roles of PPAR agonists in PBC management.

Seladelpar (MBX-8025) is a once-daily administered highly specific PPAR-δ agonist in Phase 3 and extension trials for use in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

This review provides background on current treatment options for PBC, and summarizes clinical trial data regarding the safety and effectiveness of seladelpar within the context of these treatments.

Clinical trials results demonstrate the safety and tolerability of seladelpar use for PBC, including in patients with cirrhosis. The primary composite endpoint (ALP <1.67 times ULN, decrease ≥ 15% from baseline, and TB ≤ULN) was met in 61.7% of the patients treated with seladelpar and in 20% receiving placebo (p < 0.001). Moreover, pruritus - a cardinal and often intractable symptom of PBC - was improved with seladelpar treatment, as were overall quality of life measurements. Improvements in markers of inflammation were likewise observed. These biochemical and clinical findings therefore represent landmark developments in PBC treatment and offer a therapeutic option for PBC.

Fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor α (PPARα) agonist, is widely prescribed for hyperlipidemia management. Recent studies also showed that it has therapeutic potential in various liver diseases. However, its effects on hepatomegaly and liver regeneration and the involved mechanisms remain unclear. Here, the study showed that fenofibrate significantly promoted liver enlargement and regeneration post-partial hepatectomy in mice, which was dependent on hepatocyte-expressed PPARα. Yes-associated protein (YAP) is pivotal in manipulating liver growth and regeneration. We further identified that fenofibrate activated YAP signaling by suppressing its K48-linked ubiquitination, promoting its K63-linked ubiquitination, and enhancing the interaction and transcriptional activity of the YAP-TEAD complex. Pharmacological inhibition of YAP-TEAD interaction using verteporfin or suppression of YAP using AAV Yap shRNA in mice significantly attenuated fenofibrate-induced hepatomegaly. Other factors, such as MYC, KRT23, RAS, and RHOA, might also participate in fenofibrate-promoted hepatomegaly and liver regeneration. These studies demonstrate that fenofibrate-promoted liver enlargement and regeneration are PPARα-dependent and partially through activating the YAP signaling, with clinical implications of fenofibrate as a novel therapeutic agent for promoting liver regeneration.

Cholestatic liver disease is a group of diseases in which bile acid accumulates in the liver for various reasons, resulting in abnormal liver biochemical indicators and histological damage. Cholestasis can be divided into intrahepatic cholestasis and extrahepatic cholestasis, which will contribute to liver damage and progress to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis are the two most typical cholestatic liver diseases. Ursodeoxycholic acid is currently the first-line treatment for PBC, while obeticholic acid, budesonide and fibrates have also shown good potential in the treatment of PBC. There are currently no official drugs approved to treat primary sclerosing cholangitis, and the use of ursodeoxycholic acid may have certain clinical benefits. At present, progress has been made in new treatment directions for cholestatic liver disease, including fibroblast growth factor 19, cholestyramine, S-adenosyl-L-methionine, steroid drugs, farnesoid X receptor agonists, and more. Considerable progress has been made in the management of cholestatic liver disease but there are still many opportunities and challenges. In this review, we summarized the recommended guidelines for the management of cholestatic disease and the progress of new drug research and development, in order to provide an important reference for the clinical practice of cholestatic liver disease.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a rare cholestatic immune-mediated liver disease. The clinical course varies from mild to severe, with a substantial group of patients developing cirrhosis within a decade. These patients are at risk of hepatocellular carcinoma, decompensation and liver failure. First line Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment improves the cholestatic surrogate markers, and was recently associated with a favorable survival free of liver transplantation, even in case of an incomplete biochemical response. However, despite adequate UDCA therapy, patients remain at risk of liver disease progression. Therefore, on-treatment multifactor-based risk stratification is necessary to identify patients in need of additional therapy. This requires a personalized approach; especially as recent studies suggest that complete biochemical normalization as most stringent response criterion might be preferred in selected patients to optimize their outcome. Today, stricter biochemical goals might actually be reachable with the addition of farnesoid X receptor or peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, or, in highly-selected cases, use of corticosteroids. Randomized controlled trials showed improvements in the key biochemical surrogate markers with the addition of these drugs, which have also been associated with improved clinical outcome. Considering this evolving PBC landscape, with more versatile treatment options and treatment goals, this review recapitulates the recent insight in UDCA therapy, the selection of patients with a residual risk of liver disease progression and the results of the currently available second line treatment options.

Up to 40% of UDCA-treated patients do not have an adequate clinical response. Farnesoid X receptor agonists, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, and fibroblast growth factor 19 analogs were developed as adjunctive therapy. The aim of this network meta-analysis was to compare the efficacy of these drugs as add-on therapy for patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) refractory to UDCA in improving ALP levels.

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for eligible studies until 1 December 2023. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies comparing the efficacy of different combination treatments and UDCA monotherapy in UDCA-refractory PBC patients were included in the analysis. Cumulative probability was used to rank the included treatments.

A total of 23 articles were eligible for our network meta-analysis. In terms of improving ALP levels, In terms of improving ALP biochemical levels, bezafibrate combined with UDCA (MD 104.49, 95% CI 60.41, 161.92), fenofibrate combined with UDCA (MD 87.81, 95% CI (52.34, 129.79), OCA combined with UDCA (MD 65.21, 95% CI 8.99, 121.80), seladelpar combined with UDCA (MD 117.39, 95% CI 19.97, 213.95), elafibranor combined with UDCA (MD 140.73, 95% CI 74.34, 209.98), saroglitazar combined with UDCA (MD 132.09, 95% CI 13.99, 247.04) was more effective than UDCA monotherapy. Elafibranor in combination with UDCA was the most likely (32%) to be the optimal drug regimen.

As second-line therapy for UDCA-refractory PBC, PPAR agonists were more effective than any other drugs with other mechanisms in improving ALP biochemical levels, with elafibranor being the best.

Seladelpar is a potent and selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-δ agonist that targets multiple cell types involved in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), leading to anti-cholestatic, anti-inflammatory and anti-pruritic effects.

To evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of seladelpar in patients with PBC.

In an open-label, international, long-term extension study, patients with PBC completing seladelpar lead-in studies continued treatment. Seladelpar was taken orally once daily at doses of 5 or 10 mg with dose adjustment permitted for safety or tolerability. The primary analysis was for safety and the secondary efficacy analysis examined biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury. The study was terminated early due to the unexpected histological findings in a concurrent study for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, which were subsequently found to predate treatment. Safety and efficacy data were analysed through 2 years.

There were no serious treatment-related adverse events observed among 106 patients treated with seladelpar for up to 2 years. There were four discontinuations for safety, one possibly related to seladelpar. Among 53 patients who completed 2 years of seladelpar, response rates increased from years 1 to 2 for the composite endpoint (alkaline phosphatase [ALP] <1.67 × ULN, ≥15% decrease in ALP, and total bilirubin ≤ULN) and ALP normalisation from 66% to 79% and from 26% to 42%, respectively. In those with elevated bilirubin at baseline, 43% achieved normalisation at year 2.

Seladelpar was safe, and markedly improved biochemical markers of cholestasis and liver injury in patients with PBC. These effects were maintained or improved throughout the second year.

gov: NCT03301506; Clinicaltrialsregister.eu: 2017-003910-16.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic liver disease that can progress to cirrhosis and hepatic failure if left untreated. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) was introduced as a first-line drug for PBC around 1990; it remarkably improved patient outcomes, leading to the nomenclature change of PBC in 2015, from primary biliary "cirrhosis" to primary biliary "cholangitis." Nevertheless, 20-30% of patients exhibit an incomplete response to UDCA, resulting in significantly worse outcomes compared to those with a complete response. Therefore, improving the long-term outcomes of patients with an incomplete response to UDCA has been recognized as an unmet need. In addition, patients with PBC often suffer from a variety of debilitating symptoms, such as pruritus, fatigue and sicca syndrome, which significantly impair their health-related quality of life. Thus, appropriate management of these symptoms is currently regarded as another unmet need for PBC treatment. In this review, several compounds and drugs under clinical trials that can potentially solve these unmet needs are comprehensively discussed, and future directions of treatment policy of PBC are proposed for significantly improving long-term outcome as well as health-related quality of life of patients.

Although patients with advanced liver disease have been included in studies evaluating fibrates for the treatment of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), the frequency of biochemical responses and adverse effects for this group of patients was not reported separately and comprehensively.

to evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional fenofibrate therapy in patients with advanced and ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA)-refractory PBC.

Patients were analyzed retrospectively to determine the clinical therapeutic effects of UDCA with additional fenofibrate therapy versus continued UDCA monotherapy. The liver transplantation (LT)-free survival and the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) normalization rates were estimated using Cox regression analyses and Kaplan-Meier plots with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW).

A total of 118 patients were included: 54 received UDCA alone and 64 received UDCA in combination with fenofibrate therapy. In the fenofibrate and UDCA groups, 37% and 11% of patients with advanced and UDCA-refractory PBC, respectively, achieved ALP normalization (P=0.001). Additional fenofibrate therapy improved both LT-free survival and ALP normalization rate after IPTW (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.23, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.07-0.75, P=0.015; and HR: 11.66, 95% CI: 5.02-27.06, P=0.001, respectively). These effects were supported by parallel changes in the rates of liver decompensation and histologic progression, and the United Kingdom (UK)-PBC and Globe risk scores. During the follow-up period, serum levels of ALP and aminotransferase decreased significantly, while total bilirubin, albumin, platelet, serum creatinine, and estimated glomerular filtration rate remained stable in fenofibrate-treated participants. No fenofibrate-related significant adverse events were observed in our cohort.

Additional fenofibrate therapy significantly improved LT-free survival and ALP normalization in patients with advanced and UDCA-refractory PBC. Furthermore, adding-on fenofibrate therapy appeared to be safe and well tolerated in this population.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a progressive autoimmune liver disease, and patients with inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment show reduced long-term survival. Recent studies have shown that fenofibrate is an effective off-label therapy for PBC. However, prospective studies on biochemical response including the timing of fenofibrate administration are lacking. This study is aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of fenofibrate in UDCA treatment-naive patients with PBC.

A total of 117 treatment-naive patients with PBC were recruited from the Xijing Hospital for a 12-month randomized, parallel, and open-label clinical trial. Study participants were assigned to receive either UDCA standard dose (UDCA-only group) or fenofibrate at a daily dose of 200 mg in addition to UDCA (UDCA-Fenofibrate group).

The primary outcome was biochemical response percentage in patients according to the Barcelona criterion at 12 months. In the UDCA-Fenofibrate group, 81.4% (69.9%-92.9%) of patients achieved the primary outcome and 64.3% (51.9%-76.8%) in the UDCA-only group achieved the primary outcome ( P = 0.048). There was no difference between the 2 groups in noninvasive measures of liver fibrosis and biochemical markers other than alkaline phosphatase at 12 months. Creatinine and transaminases levels in the UDCA-Fenofibrate group increased within the first month, then returned to normal, and remained stable thereafter until the end of the study, even in patients with cirrhosis.

In this randomized clinical trial in treatment-naive patients with PBC, the combination of fenofibrate and UDCA resulted in a significantly higher biochemical response rate. Fenofibrate seemed to be well-tolerated in patients.

Patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who respond poorly to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) are increasingly being trialed using fibrates, showing promising results. To further investigate, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefit of administrating fibrates to patients with PBC. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane library databases were searched using the keywords "bezafibrate", "fenofibrate", "fibrate", "primary biliary cholangitis" and clinical studies involving the use of fibrates in patients with PBC were included. The primary outcome of this study was the effect of fibrates administration on biochemical markers related to cholestasis in patients with PBC, and the secondary outcome was the incidence of treatment-related adverse events. A total of 20 studies with 4783 participants were included in this study. The results revealed that adding fibrates could significantly reduce the levels of ALP (fibrates vs. placebo, MD: - 370.14, P = 0.04; fibrates + UDCA vs. UDCA, MD: - 184.15, P < 0.01), total cholesterol (MD: - 2.82, P = 0.04), GGT (fibrates vs. placebo, MD: - 140.88, P < 0.01; fibrates + UDCA vs. UDCA, MD: - 130.73, P = 0.04), alleviate pruritus symptoms (RD: - 0.20, 95% CI: - 0.39 ~  - 0.01, P = 0.04), and did not significantly increase the incidence of treatment-related side effects. Fibrates can significantly improve liver biochemical parameters and alleviate pruritus in PBC patients.

The field of hepatology has made impressive progress over its ~75 years of existence. Advances in understanding liver function and its dysregulation in disease, genetic determinants of disease, antiviral therapy, and transplantation have transformed the lives of patients. However, there are still significant challenges that require ongoing creativity and discipline, particularly with the emergence of fatty liver diseases, as well as managing autoimmune disease, cancer, and liver disease in children. Diagnostic advances are urgently needed to accelerate risk stratification and efficient testing of new agents with greater precision in enriched populations. Integrated, holistic care models should be extended beyond liver cancer to diseases like NAFLD with systemic manifestations or extrahepatic comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, addiction, and depressive disorders. To meet the growing burden of asymptomatic liver disease, the workforce will need to be expanded by incorporating more advanced practice providers and educating other specialists. The training of future hepatologists will benefit from incorporating emerging skills in data management, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine. Continued investment in basic and translational science is crucial for further progress. The challenges ahead are significant, but with collective effort, the field of hepatology will continue to make progress and overcome obstacles.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic autoimmune liver disease characterized by a destructive, small duct, and lymphocytic cholangitis, and marked by the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies. The incidence and prevalence of PBC vary widely in different regions and time periods, and although disproportionally more common among White non-Hispanic females, contemporary data show a higher prevalence in males and racial minorities than previously described. Outcomes largely depend on early recognition of the disease and prompt institution of treatment, which, in turn, are directly influenced by provider bias and socioeconomic factors. Ursodeoxycholic acid remains the initial treatment of choice for PBC, with obeticholic acid and fibrates (off-label therapy) reserved as add-on therapy for the management of inadequate responders or those with ursodeoxycholic acid intolerance. Novel and repurposed drugs are currently at different stages of clinical development not only for the treatment of PBC but also for its symptomatic management. Here, we summarize the most up-to-date data regarding the epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment of PBC, providing clinically useful information for its holistic management.

Although fibrates were developed as lipid-lowering drugs, their efficacy against liver dysfunction in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, such as primary biliary cholangitis, primary sclerosing cholangitis, and fatty liver disease, has also been reported. Although fibrates act on some peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs), pemafibrate is a novel selective PPAR-α modulator. The present study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of switching from bezafibrate to pemafibrate in patients with chronic liver disease.

We analyzed 58 patients with chronic liver disease who switched from bezafibrate to pemafibrate because of minor adverse effects and/or incomplete response.

This study included 41 patients with cholestatic liver disease and 17 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Reasons for switching to pemafibrate were renal function decline in 31 patients, hemoglobin decline in 17 patients, creatine kinase (CK) elevation in 11 patients, incomplete response of liver dysfunction in 39 patients, and incomplete response of hyperlipidemia in 13 patients. After 3 months, although no significant change in CK was seen, hemoglobin and estimated glomerular filtration rate were significantly increased, and creatinine was significantly decreased. Significant decreases in hepatobiliary enzymes were seen in patients with cholestatic liver diseases, but not in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. No significant changes in serum lipids were observed. No patients discontinued pemafibrate due to adverse events.

Switching to pemafibrate could improve adverse effects due to bezafibrate, and appeared effective against liver dysfunction in cholestatic liver disease patients with incomplete response to bezafibrate.

The discovery of nuclear receptors and transporters has contributed to the development of new drugs for the treatment of cholestatic liver diseases. Particular progress has been made in the development of second-line therapies for PBC. These new drugs can be separated into compounds primarily targeting cholestasis, molecules targeting fibrogenesis and molecules with immune-mediated action. Finally, drugs aimed at symptom relief (pruritus and fatigue) are also under investigation. Obeticholic acid is currently the only approved second-line therapy for PBC. Drugs in the late phase of clinical development include peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists, norursodeoxycholic acid and NADPH oxidase 1/4 inhibitors.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease involving the small intrahepatic bile ducts; when untreated or undertreated, it may evolve to liver fibrosis and cirrhosis. Ursodeoxycholic Acid (UDCA) is the standard of care treatment, Obeticholic Acid (OCA) has been approved as second-line therapy for those non responder or intolerant to UDCA. However, due to moderate rate of UDCA-non responders and to warnings recently issued against OCA use in patients with cirrhosis, further therapies are needed.Areas covered. Deep investigations into the pathogenesis of PBC is leading to proposal of new therapeutic agents, among which peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) ligands seem to be highly promising given the preliminary, positive results in Phase 2 and 3 trials. Bezafibrate, the most evaluated, is currently used in clinical practice in combination with UDCA in referral centers. We herein describe completed and ongoing trials involving PPAR agonists use in PBC, analyzing pits and falls.

Testing new therapeutic opportunities in PBC is challenging due to its low prevalence and slow progression. However, new drugs including PPAR agonists, are currently under investigation and should be considered for at-risk PBC patients.

Objective: To delineate the curative effect and safety of anti-fibrosis Chinese patent medicines (CPMs) combined with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, Wanfang database, VIP database, China Biology Medicine Database, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from their inception until August 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of the treatment of PBC with anti-fibrotic CPMs were collected. The eligibility of the publications was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. The evaluation indicators were the clinical efficacy rate, liver fibrosis, liver function, immune function, and symptom score. Meta-analysis and subgroup analysis were conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-fibrosis CPMs. Risk ratio (RR) was used to assess dichotomous variables, and continuous variables with a 95% confidence interval were calculated using mean difference. Results: Twenty-two RCTs including 1,725 patients were selected. The findings demonstrated that anti-fibrotic CPMs combined with UDCA improved the efficacy rate, liver function, liver fibrosis, immunological indicators, and clinical symptoms compared with UDCA alone (all p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the combination of anti-fibrotic CPMs and UDCA can improve both clinical symptoms and outcomes. Nevertheless, more high-quality RCTs are needed to assess the effectiveness of anti-fibrosis CPMs for PBC.

Fenofibrate (FF) has been suggested as a second-line therapy for primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) with suboptimal response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). But its long-term effect is unclear.

From a retrospective cohort (N.=838), we enrolled 106 UDCA-refractory PBC patients, among them 62 received UDCA monotherapy (UDCA group) and 44 received FF combined with UDCA (UDCA+FF group). Changes of liver biochemistries and prognosis after treatment were determined. In addition, sequential liver biopsies were used to assess the effect of FF on histological parameters.

We found adding FF could significantly reduce serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), but for patients with pretreatment ALP≥1.67 upper limit of normal (ULN), the significant decline of serum ALP was only observed in the UDCA+FF group after 1 year of therapy. The mean GLOBE Score and the liver transplant-free survival predicted by GLOBE Score were both improved significantly in patients receiving UDCA+FF after 1 year of therapy. The liver-related death or liver transplant calculated using UK-PBC risk score was significantly reduced in patients receiving UDCA+FF after 1 year of therapy. Although there was no marked difference in the final histological analysis after 3 years of therapy, patients receiving UDCA+FF had improvements or stabilization in fibrosis (85.7%), and bile duct loss (78.6%) were more than that of patients receiving UDCA (70.6% and 76.5%, respectively).

Adding FF improves GLOBE and UK-PBC scores and is also associated with the improvements or stabilization of disease features, including fibrosis and ductular injury.

The term 'PBC/AIH-overlap' has been applied when features of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH), be they biochemical, serological or histological, coexist with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), either at first presentation or sequentially during disease course. Several treatment paradigms have been proposed, extrapolated from those of the primary conditions. However, there are no randomised studies showing improved survival with combination therapy compared to bile acid monotherapy. In the absence of high-quality evidence, multidisciplinary patient-specific approaches must be used to individualise treatment pathways, with appreciation that disease phenotypes are not always static, differ in treatment responses, and have the potential to evolve over time.

Fenofibrate (FF) has shown potential benefits in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who have an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA). However, the efficacy and safety of FF in patients with cirrhosis remain unclear. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of additional FF therapy in patients with PBC-related cirrhosis with an incomplete response to UDCA, we conducted a retrospective analysis comparing the clinical results of additional FF therapy and continued UDCA monotherapy. A total of 59 patients were included; 27 cases underwent UDCA monotherapy and 32 cases underwent UDCA combined with FF therapy. A significant difference in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) normalization was achieved in the FF group compared to the UDCA group (37% vs. 11%, respectively; p = 0.020). Additional FF therapy was an independent risk factor for ALP normalization (hazard ratio, 7.679; 95% confidence interval, 2.059-28.633; p = 0.003). Hepatic deterioration was experienced by 40% versus 48% (p = 0.562) while 11% vs. 37% (p = 0.111) experienced liver-related mortality or liver transplantation in the FF and UDCA groups, respectively. Compared to UDCA monotherapy, additional FF therapy was associated with lower United Kingdom (UK)-PBC risk score and surrogate serum indices of liver fibrosis. After 12 months of add-on FF therapy, median ALP level and UK-PBC risk score decreased 35% and 52% from baseline (p = 0.001 and 0.210, respectively). Serum aminotransferase, triglyceride, and cholesterol decreased progressively, while total bilirubin, serum creatinine, blood urea, estimated glomerular filtration rate, aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index, and fibrosis-4 index remained stable in FF-treated cirrhotic cases during follow-up. No significant adverse effects associated with additional FF therapy were observed in our cohort. Conclusion: Additional FF therapy was associated with higher ALP normalization rates and lower UK-PBC risk scores in patients with cirrhotic PBC with an incomplete response to UDCA. In addition, FF therapy seemed safe and well tolerated with a low frequency of adverse effects in patients with cirrhosis.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an autoimmune chronic cholestatic liver disease characterized by progressive cholangiocyte and bile duct destruction leading to fibrosis and finally to liver cirrhosis. The presence of disease-specific serological antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) together with elevated alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as a biomarker of cholestasis is sufficient for diagnosis. Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first treatment option for PBC. Up to 40% of patients have an incomplete response to therapy, and over time disease progresses to liver cirrhosis. Several risk scores are proposed for better evaluation of patients before and during treatment to stratify patients at increased risk of disease progression. GLOBE score and UK PBC risk score are used for the evaluation of UDCA treatment and Mayo risk score for transplant-free survival. Liver transplantation (LT) is the only treatment option for end-stage liver disease. More than 10 years after LT, 40% of patients experience recurrence of the disease. A liver biopsy is required to establish rPBC (recurrent primary biliary cholangitis). The only treatment option for rPBC is UDCA, and data show biochemical and clinical improvement, plus potential beneficial effects for use after transplantation for the prevention of rPBC development. Additional studies are required to assess the full impact of rPBC on graft and recipient survival and for treatment options for rPBC.

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of pemafibrate (PEM) in primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) patients with dyslipidemia.

Patients who were diagnosed with PBC between June 2018 and December 31, 2020 were included in the study if they also had dyslipidemia and their alkaline phosphatase (ALP) or gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels remained above the normal range despite taking 600 mg/day ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) for at least 6 months. Patients who were treated with UDCA alone were administered PEM as an add-on (PEM-add group), and patients who were treated with UDCA and bezafibrate (BEZ) for at least 6 months were given PEM instead of BEZ (PEM-switch group). Clinical parameters were compared in all patients, and the levels of ALP, GGT, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and creatinine (Cr) were compared between the PEM-add and PEM-switch groups. Improvement in cholangitis was also evaluated.

In the PEM-add group, both ALP and GGT improved in 40 of 46 patients (87.0%). In the PEM-switch group, both ALP and GGT improved in 15 of 29 patients (51.7%). In the PEM-switch group, however, significant improvement was seen in eGFR and Cr.

Administration of PEM is effective in PBC patients with dyslipidemia who are refractory to UDCA monotherapy. In patients using both UDCA and BEZ, there was an advantage in switching to PEM if they had renal damage; however, improvement of ALP and GGT occurred in about 50%.

This review analyses the main features of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) and provides an overview of the currently available (bile acid) bile acid related treatments.

In PBC, biliary injury is the consequence of a dysregulated intrahepatic and systemic immune response. Given the close association between PSC and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the microbiota represents an important factor in the development of PSC. Bile acid based pharmacological treatments could represent promising therapeutic strategies in the management of cholangiopathies.

Cholangiopathies include a spectrum of diseases resulting in cholestasis, an impairment of bile flow in the biliary tree, leading to biliary obstruction and damage as well as liver inflammation and fibrosis. PSC and PBC are highly heterogeneous cholangiopathies and progressive disorders with defined pathophysiological mechanisms. Curative treatments have not been established, and although their prevalence is low, they are a frequent indication for liver transplantation in the advanced stages of cholangiopathies. These diseases still present with unmet therapeutic strategies, also taking into account that on average 30-40% of patients undergoing liver transplantation will have recurrence of the original illness.

Aim: Up to 40% of patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) will have a suboptimal biochemical response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), which can be improved by the addition of fibrates. This exploratory study aims to evaluate the long-term real-life biochemical response of different fibrates, including ciprofibrate, in subjects with UDCA-unresponsive PBC. Methods: The Brazilian Cholestasis Study Group multicenter database was reviewed to assess the response rates to UDCA plus fibrates in patients with UDCA-unresponsive PBC 1 and 2 years after treatment initiation by different validated criteria. Results: In total, 27 patients (100% women, mean age 48.9 ± 9.2 years) with PBC were included. Overall response rates to fibrates by each validated criterion varied from 39 to 60% and 39-76% at 12 and 24 months after treatment combination, respectively. Combination therapy resulted in a significant decrease in ALT and ALP only after 2 years, while GGT significantly improved in the first year of treatment. Treatment response rates at 1 and 2 years appear to be comparable between ciprofibrate and bezafibrate using all available criteria. Conclusion: Our findings endorse the efficacy of fibrate add-on treatment in PBC patients with suboptimal response to UDCA. Ciprofibrate appears to be at least as effective as bezafibrate and should be assessed in large clinical trials as a possibly new, cheaper, and promising option for treatment of UDCA-unresponsive PBC patients.

The term cholestasis refers to bile acid retention, whether within the hepatocyte or in the bile ducts of any caliber. Biochemically, it is defined by a level of alkaline phosphatase that is 1.67-times higher than the upper limit of normal. Cholestatic diseases can be associated with an inflammatory process of the liver that destroys hepatocytes (hepatitis), withjaundice (yellowing of the skin and mucus membranes, associated with elevated serum bilirubin levels), or with both, albeit the three concepts should not be considered synonymous. Cholestatic diseases can be classified as intrahepatic or extrahepatic, depending on their etiology. Knowing the cause of the condition is important for choosing the adequate diagnostic studies and appropriate treatment in each case. A complete medical history, together with a thorough physical examination and basic initial studies, such as liver ultrasound and liver function tests, aid the clinician in deciding which path to follow, when managing the patient with cholestasis. In a joint effort, the Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología (AMH), the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (AMG) and the Asociación Mexicana de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal (AMEG) developed the first Mexican scientific position statement on said theme.

Saroglitazar is a novel peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR) agonist with dual agonistic properties (α/γ). Due to a strong mechanistic rationale, we aimed to test the safety and efficacy of saroglitazar in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) who were either ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) resistant or intolerant.

In this double-blind, phase II proof-of-concept trial, 37 patients with PBC were randomized to saroglitazar 4 mg (n = 13), saroglitazar 2 mg (n = 14), or placebo (n = 10) daily for 16 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the reduction in alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level at Week 16.

A significant reduction of mean ALP levels was observed at Week 16 relative to baseline in both the saroglitazar 4 mg (least-squares [LS] mean =-163.3 U/L, SE = 25.1, p <0.001) and 2 mg (LS mean =-155.8 U/L, SE = 24.4, p <0.001) groups, compared with placebo (LS mean =-21.1 U/L, SE = 28.9). Treatment with saroglitazar resulted in a rapid reduction of ALP concentration at Week 4 that was sustained through the study duration. At least 1 treatment-emergent adverse event occurred in 11 (84.6%) patients in the saroglitazar 4 mg group, in 12 (85.7%) patients in the 2 mg group and in 8 (80%) patients in the placebo group. Study drug was discontinued in 4 patients (3 patients in the 4 mg group and 1 patient in the 2 mg group) due to aminotransferase increases that promptly returned to baseline values after drug discontinuation.

Saroglitazar at 2 mg and 4 mg daily was tolerated and resulted in rapid and sustained improvements in ALP. Further studies are underway at a daily dose of 2 mg and 1 mg due to the higher incidence of elevated liver enzymes observed with the 4 mg dose. CLINICALTRIALS.

NCT03112681 LAY SUMMARY: Saroglitazar resulted in a rapid and sustained improvement in alkaline phosphatase levels in patients with primary biliary cholangitis. The mean percentage reductions in alkaline phosphatase levels were 49% and 51% in the saroglitazar 4 mg and 2 mg groups compared to 3% in the placebo group.

Cholestatic and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) share several key pathophysiological mechanisms which can be targeted by novel therapeutic concepts that are currently developed for both areas. Nuclear receptors (NRs) are ligand-activated transcriptional regulators of key metabolic processes including hepatic lipid and glucose metabolism, energy expenditure and bile acid (BA) homoeostasis, as well as inflammation, fibrosis and cellular proliferation. Dysregulation of these processes contributes to the pathogenesis and progression of cholestatic as well as fatty liver disease, placing NRs at the forefront of novel therapeutic approaches. This includes BA and fatty acid activated NRs such as farnesoid-X receptor (FXR) and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, respectively, for which high affinity therapeutic ligands targeting specific or multiple isoforms have been developed. Moreover, novel liver-specific ligands for thyroid hormone receptor beta 1 complete the spectrum of currently available NR-targeted drugs. Apart from FXR ligands, BA signalling can be targeted by mimetics of FXR-activated fibroblast growth factor 19, modulation of their enterohepatic circulation through uptake inhibitors in hepatocytes and enterocytes, as well as novel BA derivatives undergoing cholehepatic shunting (instead of enterohepatic circulation). Other therapeutic approaches more directly target inflammation and/or fibrosis as critical events of disease progression. Combination strategies synergistically targeting metabolic disturbances, inflammation and fibrosis may be ultimately necessary for successful treatment of these complex and multifactorial disorders.

The term cholestasis refers to bile acid retention, whether within the hepatocyte or in the bile ducts of any caliber. Biochemically, it is defined by a level of alkaline phosphatase that is 1.67-times higher than the upper limit of normal. Cholestatic diseases can be associated with an inflammatory process of the liver that destroys hepatocytes (hepatitis), withjaundice (yellowing of the skin and mucus membranes, associated with elevated serum bilirubin levels), or with both, albeit the three concepts should not be considered synonymous. Cholestatic diseases can be classified as intrahepatic or extrahepatic, depending on their etiology. Knowing the cause of the condition is important for choosing the adequate diagnostic studies and appropriate treatment in each case. A complete medical history, together with a thorough physical examination and basic initial studies, such as liver ultrasound and liver function tests, aid the clinician in deciding which path to follow, when managing the patient with cholestasis. In a joint effort, the Asociación Mexicana de Hepatología (AMH), the Asociación Mexicana de Gastroenterología (AMG) and the Asociación Mexicana de Endoscopia Gastrointestinal (AMEG) developed the first Mexican scientific position statement on said theme.

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is an immune-mediated chronic liver disease characterized by biliary epithelial injury, cholestasis, and progressive fibrosis that can lead to cirrhosis and requirement for liver transplantation. All patients with PBC should receive initial treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), and odds for response are based on characteristics at baseline. It is important to have clear definitions of patients at risk for a poor response to therapy, of biochemical markers of an incomplete response, and standardized management. Patients typically are assessed after 12 months of treatment with UDCA for biochemical markers of response. However, evaluation at 6 months has been proposed for patients with more severe disease or symptoms (such as pruritus or fatigue). Markers of response to therapy include reduced serum levels of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin (Paris-2, Toronto, GLOBE, and so forth); patients with high levels of total and conjugated bilirubin or levels of alkaline phosphatase more than 1.5-fold the upper limit of normal should be considered for second-line therapy. Patients with adequate biochemical responses can continue UDCA monotherapy. Incomplete responders should be considered for second-line therapies with obeticholic acid (licensed) or fibrates (unlicensed) in addition to continued treatment with UDCA. Patients with PBC should be followed up for life.

The addition of a fibrate to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the standard treatment for asymptomatic primary biliary cholangitis (aPBC) with an incomplete response to UDCA. Among the fibrates, bezafibrate and fenofibrate increase the serum creatinine level and reduce the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Pemafibrate is an selective peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha modulator (SPPARM-α) mainly metabolized by the liver that was recently approved to treat dyslipidemia. This study confirmed the changes in the biochemical markers after switching from fenofibrate to pemafibrate in aPBC patients.

This study examined the effects of switching treatment from fenofibrate to pemafibrate in 16 aPBC patients. The biological parameters of these patients were examined at the initiation of fenofibrate and after switching to pemafibrate, then at 24 and 48 weeks later, respectively.

Among patients with aPBC treated with UDCA and fenofibrate, the ALP, GGT, and serum IgM levels decreased significantly (p<0.0001) over 48 weeks. On the other hand, serum creatinine levels increased significantly, and eGFR decreased significantly (p<0.0001). After switching to pemafibrate plus UDCA, patients with aPBC exhibited significantly lower serum creatinine levels (p=0.007) and significantly higher eGFR levels (p=0.014).

Pemafibrate has therapeutic efficacy for aPBC patients with an inadequate response to UDCA. Pemafibrate might be another option for aPBC patients given its beneficial effects on renal function, but larger, multicenter studies with a longer follow-up are needed.

A beneficial effect of bezafibrate (BZF) on symptoms and biochemical features of primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) has been reported in patients with an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA), but long-term effects on survival remain unknown. In Japan, BZF has been used as a de facto second-line therapy for PBC since 2000. Herein, we compared the survival rates between patients treated with and those without BZF in a large nationwide Japanese PBC cohort.

All consecutively registered patients of this cohort who started UDCA therapy from 2000 onwards and had a follow-up ≥1 year were included. Association between BZF exposure and mortality or need for liver transplantation (LT) was assessed using time-dependent, multivariable-and propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models. Clinical benefit was quantified using the number needed to treat (NNT).

Of 3,908 eligible patients, 3,162 (81%) received UDCA only and 746 (19%) UDCA and BZF over 17,360 and 3,932 patient-years, respectively. During follow-up, 183 deaths (89 liver-related) and 21 LT were registered. Exposure to combination therapy was associated with a significant decrease in all-cause and liver-related mortality or need for LT (adjusted hazard ratios: 0.3253, 95% CI 0.1936-0.5466 and 0.2748, 95% CI 0.1336-0.5655, respectively; p <0.001 for both). This association was consistent across various risk groups at baseline. The NNTs with combination therapy to prevent 1 additional death or LT over 5, 10, and 15 years were 29 (95% CI 22-46), 14 (10-22), and 8 (6-15), respectively.

In a large retrospective cohort study of treatment effects in patients with PBC, the addition of BZF to UDCA was associated with improved prognosis.

The long-term efficacy of bezafibrate (BZF) on liver transplantation (LT) - free survival in patients with PBC and an incomplete response to ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) remains to be determined. In this Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study, the use of UDCA-BZF combination therapy, compared to UDCA alone, was associated with a lower risk of all-cause and liver-related mortality or need for LT. These results indicate that BZF is so far the only drug in PBC to have demonstrated efficacy in improving symptoms, biochemical markers, and long-term outcomes.

Ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) is the first line therapy for the treatment of cholestatic and autoimmune liver diseases. Its clinical use is currently limited by a significant proportion of non-responder patients. Polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 PUFAs) possess important anti-inflammatory properties and protect liver cells against bile acid (BA)-induced toxicity. The present study was designed to rapidly evaluate whether combining n-3 PUFAs (i.e., eicosapentaenoic [EPA] and docosahexaenoic [DHA] acids) to UDCA would provide additional benefits when compared to the drug alone. The parameters evaluated were (i) the expression of genes governing BA synthesis, transport, and metabolism; (ii) the prevention of BA-induced apoptosis and endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-stress; and (iii) the control of BA- and LPS-dependent inflammation. In the absence of n-3 PUFAs, most of the parameters investigated were unaffected by UDCA or were only altered by the higher dose (500 µM) of the drug. By contrast, in the presence of EPA/DHA (50/50 µM), all parameters showed a strongly improved response and the lowest UDCA dosage (50 µM) provided equal or better benefits than the highest dose used alone. For example, the combination EPA/DHA + UDCA 50 µM caused comparable down-regulation of the CYP7A1 gene expression and of the BA-induced caspase 3 activity as observed with UDCA 500 µM. In conclusion, these results suggest that the addition of n-3 PUFAs to UDCA may improve the response to the drug, and that such a pharmaco-nutraceutical approach could be used in clinic to open the narrow therapeutic dose of UDCA in cholestatic liver diseases.