Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has long been used to treat behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia (BPSD). However, there are no guidelines for the use of ECT in this population. Contributing to efforts addressing this gap in the literature, this qualitative systematic review examines areas of consensus and disagreement in currently published protocols for the use of ECT in BPSD.

MEDLINE and PsychInfo were searched for primary and secondary literature meeting the aim of this review. All articles were screened, full-text reviewed, and extracted in duplicate. A framework synthesis methodology was used to identify key steps in conducting ECT for BPSD.

Thirty-two studies were included in this systematic review. Although these studies converged on similar indications for using ECT in BPSD, there was significant heterogeneity in the stimulus characteristics used and approaches to maintenance treatment.

ECT holds promise in the treatment of BPSD. Although further research is needed to establish optimal treatment parameters, this review can be used by clinicians to identify potential approaches to using ECT.

The aim of the study were to describe the practice of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) at the Institute of Psychiatry (IPUB) of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) from 2015 to 2019 and to compare it with previous years at the same institute and with international practices.

Sociodemographic and epidemiological data, along with information on ECT and anesthetic techniques, were collected from the medical records of all patients who received ECT at IPUB-UFRJ between 2015 and 2019.

A total of 238 patients underwent 4110 ECT sessions during the study period. A slight predominance of female patients (55.9%) was observed. Most patients were aged between 21 and 40 years (46.2%). Over half of the patients were outpatients (63.4%), with bipolar affective disorder being the most common diagnosis, accounting for 35.7% of ECT indications. Consent for ECT was obtained from all patients. Most treatments (85.2%) were conducted during the acute phase of illness. The average number of ECT sessions per patient was 5.4. All patients received anesthesia, and no deaths or severe complications related to ECT occurred. Monitoring cognitive effects and discharge criteria were the responsibility of the attending physician.

The practice of ECT at IPUB-UFRJ adhered to both local and international guidelines. There has been a notable shift in the utilization patterns of ECT at the institute compared to previous years. Standardized monitoring of cognitive effects and discharge criteria remains essential.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for a range of psychiatric disorders. Although much research has examined what patients receive ECT, there is less research describing those physicians who provide ECT services. This study examines the ECT workforce in the United States by analyzing publicly available Medicare billing records.

Data regarding the providers performing ECT were accessed from the Medicare Physician and Other Supplier Data for the years 2013 through 2021 based on those physicians who billed the ECT procedural code 90870.

During the study period, 1402 physicians performed ECT in at least 1 calendar year on a minimum of 11 Medicare beneficiaries, representing 3.9% of the 36,116 psychiatrists who billed Medicare during this period. Female physicians made up 39% of psychiatrists overall who bill Medicare, but 23% of psychiatrists billing for ECT. Fifty percent of billed ECT treatments were performed by 12% of ECT doctors; among these high-volume ECT providers, 16% were female.

Only a small subset of psychiatrists who bill Medicare provide ECT services, and female physicians are under-represented in the ECT workforce and among high-volume ECT providers. Improving workforce equity and with it access to ECT requires further study of psychiatric training and practice environment that may impose barriers on female participation as ECT providers.

Medical contraindications and complications pose challenges for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Most published reports are scattered across various physiological systems and individual disease conditions. This review aimed to evaluate the literature on physiological and medical complexities during ECT and discuss risk mitigation strategies in a comprehensive review. We searched PubMed and Embase for contraindications and precautions during ECT with relevant MeSH terms and appraised previous reviews on the same topic. The results suggest that mortality directly attributed to ECT is extremely rare. Instances of fatalities, including fetal deaths, have been reported after ECT in the presence of recent myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, intracranial aneurysm and tumors, pheochromocytoma, sepsis, and pregnancy. However, there are no definite conclusions or consensus on attributions of the outcomes to ECT in all cases because of the time lag between the treatment and deaths and confounding factors. The risks can be mitigated with safety protocols, adequate stakeholder communication, collaboration with anesthetists and specialists, consultation-liaison services, and ECT education. Overall, ECT remains a relatively safe treatment even in the presence of medical and physiological complexities. In rare instances, certain medical conditions may indicate a high risk for ECT, where practitioners avoid the treatment or administer it with precautions if the risk-benefit ratio favors its use.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for various mental disorders. However, ECT can induce significant haemodynamic fluctuations, raising safety concerns. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effects of adding beta-blockers to ECT on maximum heart rate after stimulation and the occurrence of adverse events. Only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the addition of beta-blockers to ECT with treatment as usual (TAU), such as placebo added to ECT or ECT without antihypertensive or antiarrhythmic medications, were included. The primary outcomes were maximum heart rate and the percentage of patients who experienced adverse events after stimulation. A total of 31 publications (33 studies, 42 comparisons, 1476 participants) were included. The beta-blocker group showed a significant reduction in maximum heart rate after stimulation compared to TAU group (28 publications, 29 studies, 38 comparisons, n = 1,375, mean difference (MD) = 21.98, 95% CI 17.94-26.02, p < 0.01). Significant differences were maintained in subgroup and sensitivity analyses. Furthermore, there was no significant increase in the risk of adverse events after stimulation compared to TAU group (20 publications, 21 studies, 27 comparisons, n = 1,014, RR = 1.44, 95% CI 0.93-2.25, p = 0.11). This is the first meta-analysis to assess the cardiovascular effects of beta-blockers during ECT. It demonstrated that the addition of beta-blockers to ECT may stabilise heart rate after stimulation without increasing adverse events. These results suggest that the addition of beta blockers may benefit high-risk patients who experience difficulty continuing ECT due to adverse events such as arrhythmias or tachycardia after stimulation.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a safe and effective treatment for several major psychiatric conditions, including treatment-resistant depression, mania, and schizophrenia; nevertheless, its use remains controversial. Despite its availability in some European countries, ECT is still rarely used in others. This study aims to investigate the experiences and attitudes of early career psychiatrists (ECPs) across Europe towards ECT and to examine how their exposure to ECT influences their perceptions.

In Europe, a cross-sectional survey was conducted among ECPs, including psychiatric trainees and recently fully qualified psychiatrists.

A total of 573 participants from 30 European countries were included in the study, of whom more than half (N = 312; 54.5%) received ECT training. Overall, ECPs had a positive attitude towards ECT, with the vast majority agreeing or strongly agreeing that ECT is an effective (N = 509; 88.8%) and safe (N = 464; 81.0%) treatment and disagreeing or strongly disagreeing that ECT was used as a form of control or punishment (N = 545; 95.1%). Those who had received ECT training during their psychiatry training were more likely to recommend ECT to their patients (p < 0.001, r = 0.34), and held more positive views on its safety (p < 0.001, r = 0.31) and effectiveness (p < 0.001, r = 0.33). Interest in further education about ECT was moderately high (modal rating on Likert scale: 4, agree), irrespective of prior training exposure.

ECT training is associated with more favorable perceptions of its safety and effectiveness among ECPs. There is a general willingness among ECPs to expand their knowledge and training on ECT, which could enhance patients' access to this treatment.

Electroconvulsive therapy is an effective treatment for several psychiatric conditions. There are theoretical risks associated with electroconvulsive therapy in patients who are anticoagulated. However, there is no review investigating these adverse effects.

This systematic review explored the literature on using electroconvulsive therapy in anticoagulated patients, including adverse effects associated with continuation or cessation of anticoagulation during electroconvulsive therapy.

The study was registered on PROSPERO (registration CRD42023432178). A search was conducted across CENTRAL, Embase, Medline and PsychINFO databases, with title and abstract screening, full-text review and data extraction by two independent reviewers. Patients planned for electroconvulsive therapy and on anticoagulation prior to electroconvulsive therapy were included. Papers not related to electroconvulsive therapy or anticoagulation were excluded. Data were recorded in Microsoft Excel, presented in tables.

The studies comprised 108 patients and over 700 sessions of electroconvulsive therapy. 64.81% patients were on warfarin, 22.22% on a direct-acting oral anticoagulant, 5.55% on heparin and the rest on enoxaparin, dalteparin, acenocoumarol or bemiparin. There were two reports of both nonfatal non-central nervous system bleeding and pulmonary embolism in patients with anticoagulation. There were no intracranial haemorrhages or deaths. Bridging or substitution with an anticoagulant with a shorter half-life had no additional benefit.

This review showed tolerability of anticoagulants continued throughout electroconvulsive therapy, with most patients reporting no adverse effects. Given limitations including few studies and medical comorbidities influencing patient risk profile, further studies are required to guide practice recommendations and review long-term outcomes.

We describe a comatose female patient after electroconvulsive therapy. Head imaging showed diffuse cerebral emboli. Transesophageal echocardiography showed left atrial myxoma which was resected soon thereafter. The article describes the presentation, complications and treatment of myxomas and discusses electroconvulsive therapy, its adverse events and the possible relation to myxoma embolization.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is an epidemic with rising social, economic, and political costs. In a patient whose major depressive episode (MDE) persists through an adequate antidepressant trial, insurance companies often cover alternative treatments which may include repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). RTMS is an FDA-cleared neuromodulation technique for TRD which is safe, efficacious, noninvasive, and well-tolerated. Recent developments in the optimization of rTMS algorithms and targeting have increased the efficacy of rTMS in treating depression, improved the clinical convenience of these treatments, and decreased the cost of a course of rTMS. In this opinion paper, we make a case for why conventional FDA-cleared rTMS should be considered as a first-line treatment for all adult MDEs. RTMS is compared to other first-line treatments including psychotherapy and SSRIs. These observations suggest that rTMS has similar efficacy, fewer side-effects, lower risk of serious adverse events, comparable compliance, the potential for more rapid relief, and cost-effectiveness. This suggestion, however, would be strengthened by further research with an emphasis on treatment-naive subjects in their first depressive episode, and trials directly contrasting rTMS with SSRIs or psychotherapy.

Cerebral aneurysm (CA), normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) with ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), and pyloric stenosis increase the risk of complications related to electroconvulsive therapy (ECT). Whereas there is some evidence for the safety of ECT in patients with CA and NPH with VPS, there is none in patients with pyloric stenosis that increases the risk of aspiration during short anesthesia. A 67-year-old female patient with a small and stable aneurysm of the right anterior cerebral artery, NPH with VPS, and severe pyloric stenosis (as a result of suicidal ingestion of pipe cleaner) suffering from therapy-resistant depression and chronic suicidal tendencies was treated successfully with 15 sessions of ECT. The following measures were taken to increase ECT-related safety and may help physicians in their decision-making process in similar cases: careful risk assessment based on presentation and discussion of the case in an academic multidisciplinary neurovascular team, glycerol trinitrate sublingual spray before short anesthesia and (after development of hypotension) switching to a pro re nata (PRN) medication with urapidil directly after electric stimulation in case of a relevant increase in blood pressure, examination of the VPS after five stimulations, oral administration of 30 mL of sodium citrate (0.3 molar) before ECT to increase the gastric pH, and establishment of a specific diet and fasting plan (generally only liquid oral food, discontinuation of oral food intake 20 hours, and administration of water only 14 hours before ECT).

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) affects approximately 2.8 million people in the U.S. with estimated annual healthcare costs of $43.8 billion. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is currently an investigational intervention for TRD. We used a decision-analytic model to compare cost-effectiveness of DBS to treatment-as-usual (TAU) for TRD. Because this therapy is not FDA approved or in common use, our goal was to establish an effectiveness threshold that trials would need to demonstrate for this therapy to be cost-effective. Remission and complication rates were determined from review of relevant studies. We used published utility scores to reflect quality of life after treatment. Medicare reimbursement rates and health economics data were used to approximate costs. We performed Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and probabilistic sensitivity analyses to estimate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER; USD/quality-adjusted life year [QALY]) at a 5-year time horizon. Cost-effectiveness was defined using willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds of $100,000/QALY and $50,000/QALY for moderate and definitive cost-effectiveness, respectively. We included 274 patients across 16 studies from 2009-2021 who underwent DBS for TRD and had ≥12 months follow-up in our model inputs. From a healthcare sector perspective, DBS using non-rechargeable devices (DBS-pc) would require 55% and 85% remission, while DBS using rechargeable devices (DBS-rc) would require 11% and 19% remission for moderate and definitive cost-effectiveness, respectively. From a societal perspective, DBS-pc would require 35% and 46% remission, while DBS-rc would require 8% and 10% remission for moderate and definitive cost-effectiveness, respectively. DBS-pc will unlikely be cost-effective at any time horizon without transformative improvements in battery longevity. If remission rates ≥8-19% are achieved, DBS-rc will likely be more cost-effective than TAU for TRD, with further increasing cost-effectiveness beyond 5 years.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be life-saving in situations where patients are at risk of dying from severe manifestations of psychiatric illness. In some of these cases, patients are unwilling/unable to consent to ECT, and involuntary ECT is required. Such use of involuntary ECT varies substantially across European countries for unclear reasons. The aim of this study was to examine clinical and legal differences in this use of involuntary ECT across European countries.

A questionnaire based on a case vignette (a 55-year-old female inpatient with psychotic depression at imminent risk of dying from metabolic derangement because of refusal to eat and drink) was sent to an ECT practitioner in each of 31 European countries.

We received responses from ECT practitioners in 18 countries. In 7 of these countries, involuntary ECT could be carried out without approval from others and/or involvement of the court system in the case described in the vignette. Practitioners in the remaining 11 countries responded that they either could not carry out involuntary ECT or would have to meet certain requirements before initiating involuntary ECT (e.g., approval from medical/ethics committee and second opinion from an independent psychiatrist). Notably, the rules regarding involuntary ECT differed for adults and minors (more restrictive for the latter) in 6 of the 18 countries.

In many European countries, legislation precludes or delays the use of involuntary ECT. Harmonization of the legislation on involuntary ECT across European countries to allow for better access to this potentially life-saving treatment seems warranted.

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and intellectual disability (ID) are heterogenous and prevalent conditions which may occur in isolation or as a co-morbidity. Psychiatric co-morbidity is common with limited treatment options. Preliminary research into electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for these conditions has been encouraging. Thus, further research in this patient population is warranted. We conducted a 10-year retrospective review of the electronic medical record and identified intellectually capable individuals with ASD (IC-ASD), and those with ASD+ID or ID who received at least three ECT treatments. 32 patients were identified of which 30 (94%) experienced positive clinical response, defined as a clinical global impression-improvement (CGI-I) score of 3 or less. The average retrospective CGI-I score across all groups was 1.97, and results of a t-test performed on CGI-I scores indicated improvement across all groups [t = - 16.54, df = 31, p < 0.001, 95% CI = (1.72, 2.22)]. No significant adverse events were identified based on clinical documentation. Our findings further support previous ECT research in this patient population.

There is an urgent need for novel fast-acting antidepressants for adolescent treatment-resistant depression and/or suicidal risk, since the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors that are clinically approved for that age (i.e., fluoxetine or escitalopram) take weeks to work. In this context, one of the main research lines of our group is to characterize at the preclinical level novel approaches for rapid-acting antidepressants for adolescence. The present review summarizes the potential use in adolescence of non-pharmacological options, such as neuromodulators (electroconvulsive therapy and other innovative types of brain stimulation), as well as pharmacological options, including consciousness-altering drugs (mainly ketamine but also classical psychedelics) and cannabinoids (i.e., cannabidiol), with promising fast-acting responses. Following a brief analytical explanation of adolescent depression, we present a general introduction for each therapeutical approach together with the clinical evidence supporting its potential beneficial use in adolescence (mainly extrapolated from prior successful examples for adults), to then report recent and/or ongoing preclinical studies that will aid in improving the inclusion of these therapies in the clinic, by considering potential sex-, age-, and dose-related differences, and/or other factors that might affect efficacy or long-term safety. Finally, we conclude the review by providing future avenues to maximize treatment response, including the need for more clinical studies and the importance of designing and/or testing novel treatment options that are safe and fast-acting for adolescent depression.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is one of the most studied and validated available treatments for severe or treatment-resistant depression. However, little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying ECT. This systematic review aims to critically review all structural magnetic resonance imaging studies investigating longitudinal cortical thickness (CT) changes after ECT in patients with unipolar or bipolar depression.

We performed a search on PubMed, Medline, and Embase to identify all available studies published before April 20, 2023. A total of 10 studies were included.

The investigations showed widespread increases in CT after ECT in depressed patients, involving mainly the temporal, insular, and frontal regions. In five studies, CT increases in a non-overlapping set of brain areas correlated with the clinical efficacy of ECT. The small sample size, heterogeneity in terms of populations, comorbidities, and ECT protocols, and the lack of a control group in some investigations limit the generalisability of the results.

Our findings support the idea that ECT can increase CT in patients with unipolar and bipolar depression. It remains unclear whether these changes are related to the clinical response. Future larger studies with longer follow-up are warranted to thoroughly address the potential role of CT as a biomarker of clinical response after ECT.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an established treatment for depression, but more data on effectiveness and safety in clinical practice is needed. The aim of this register-based study was to investigate short-term effectiveness and cognitive safety after ECT, evaluated by clinicians and patients. Secondary, we investigated predictors for remission and cognitive decline.

The study included 392 patients from the Regional Register for Neurostimulation Treatment in Western Norway. Depressive symptoms and cognitive function were assessed with Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale and Mini-Mental State Examination (clinician-rated) and Beck Depression Inventory and Everyday Memory Questionnaire (patient-rated). Assessments were done prior to ECT-series and a mean of 1.7 days after (range 6 days before and 12 days after) end of ECT-series. Paired samples t-tests were extended by detailed, clinically relevant subgroups. Predictors were examined using logistic regression.

Clinician- and patient-rated remission rates were 49.5 and 41.0%, respectively. There was a large reduction in depressive symptoms and a small improvement in cognition after ECT, but we also identified subgroups with non-response of ECT in combination with cognitive decline (4.6% clinician-rated, 15.7% patient-rated). Positive predictors for patient- and clinician-rated remission were increasing age, shorter duration of depressive episode, and psychotic features. Antipsychotic medication at the commencement of treatment and previous ECT-treatment gave higher odds of clinician-rated remission, whereas higher pretreatment subjective depression level was associated with lower odds for patient-rated remission. Clinician-rated cognitive decline was predicted by higher pretreatment MMSE scores, whereas psychotic features, increasing age, and greater pretreatment subjective memory concerns were associated with lower odds for patient-rated cognitive decline.

Our study supports ECT as an effective and safe treatment, although subgroups have a less favorable outcome. ECT should be considered at an early stage for older patients suffering from depression with psychotic features. Providing comprehensive and balanced information from clinicians and patients perspectives on effects and side effects, may assist in a joint consent process.

We have known for nearly a century that triggering seizures can treat serious mental illness, but what we do not know is why. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) works faster and better than conventional pharmacological interventions; however, those benefits come with a burden of side effects, most notably memory loss. Disentangling the mechanisms by which ECT exerts rapid therapeutic benefit from the mechanisms driving adverse effects could enable the development of the next generation of seizure therapies that lack the downside of ECT. The latest research suggests that this goal may be attainable because modifications of ECT technique have already yielded improvements in cognitive outcomes without sacrificing efficacy. These modifications involve changes in how the electricity is administered (both where in the brain, and how much), which in turn impacts the characteristics of the resulting seizure. What we do not completely understand is whether it is the changes in the applied electricity, or in the resulting seizure, or both, that are responsible for improved safety. Answering this question may be key to developing the next generation of seizure therapies that lack these adverse side effects, and ushering in novel interventions that are better, faster, and safer than ECT.

We aim to describe use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) to treat super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) in pregnancy and review the literature regarding utility and safety of ECT in refractory status epilepticus.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a commonly encountered emergency in neuro-critical care world. Pharmacotherapy of status epilepticus in pregnancy is very challenging given the effect of the majority of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on fetal development. Although there has been growing evidence for use of ECT in status epilepticus, data about its utility in pregnancy is lacking.

A twenty-one year old Caucasian female with history of epilepsy presented at 8 weeks of gestation as status epilepticus (SE) after abrupt discontinuation of her AEDs. Treatment was initiated with standard regimen of benzodiazepine and levetiracetam, which was progressively expanded to include approximately 10 anti-epileptic drugs over the course of 30 days. The status epilepticus was super refractory to sedation. She underwent ECT on day 31 with remarkable improvement in electroencephalogram (EEG) pattern and resolution of status epilepticus following a single ECT session. We reviewed PubMed and collated case reports involving the use of ECT in status epilepticus with emphasis on differences in various confounding factors esp. etiology of status and age group.

Our case is the first reported case of ECT for successful treatment of SRSE in pregnancy. While majority AEDs pose a significant maternal and fetal risk during pregnancy, ECT could be a potential frontline therapy for SE in pregnancy.

There is limited literature examining the effect of early electroconvulsive therapy(ECT) on the length of stay(LOS), especially for psychotic disorders. This study aimed to evaluate the association between early ECT and LOS in three main groups of patients with bipolar, depressive and primary psychotic disorders.

A retrospective descriptive analysis of 464 patients who received inpatient ECT from May 2017 to March 2021 in a large tertiary psychiatric institution was conducted. Early ECT was defined as ECT done before the mean number of days from admission to initiation of ECT by diagnosis. The main outcome measure was LOS, which was examined by diagnosis between the early and late ECT groups, using a linear regression model with adjustment factors chosen based on univariate analysis.

A strong, significant association was found between early ECT and a shorter LOS (β -28.3, 95 % CI -33.6 to -23.0, p < 0.001), even after accounting for adjustment factors. This association was consistent in all three diagnosis groups: bipolar disorders (β -14.5, 95 % CI -20.1 to -9.0, p < 0.001), major depressive disorder (β -18.2, 95 % CI -27.1 to -9.3, p < 0.001) and psychotic disorders (β -39.0, 95 % CI -46.8 to -31.2, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the 30-day readmission rates between the early and late ECT groups trans-diagnostically.

Early ECT is strongly associated with a shorter LOS across a range of diagnostic indications including major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. ECT can be considered earlier in treatment-decision algorithms and may offer a reduction in LOS.

Psychiatric electroceutical interventions (PEIs) use electrical or magnetic stimulation to treat mental disorders and may raise different ethical concerns than other therapies such as medications or talk therapy. Yet little is known about stakeholders' perceptions of, and ethical concerns related to, these interventions. We aimed to better understand the ethical concerns of a variety of stakeholder groups (patients with depression, caregivers of patients, members of the public, and psychiatrists) regarding four PEIs: electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), deep brain stimulation (DBS), and adaptive brain implants (ABI).

We conducted a national survey of these four stakeholder groups, using an embedded video vignette experiment depicting a patient with treatment-resistant depression and her psychiatrist discussing the possibility of treatment with one of the four PEIs.

Participants' ethical concerns varied by stakeholder group, by PEI, and by the interaction of the two. The three non-clinician groups tended to have similar ethical concerns, but to differ from psychiatrists. Similar concerns were raised with regard to the two implantable technologies, DBS and ABI. Overall, there was relatively little concern about the involuntary use of PEIs, though some expressed concern about the adequacy of information provided during the consent process. There was also significant concern that patients may not receive helpful therapies.

To our knowledge, this is the first national survey that includes multiple stakeholder groups and multiple PEI modalities. A better understanding of the ethical concerns of stakeholders can help to shape clinical practice and health care policy regarding PEIs.

ECT is considered the fastest and most effective treatment for TRD. Ketamine seems to be an attractive alternative due to its rapid-onset antidepressant effects and impact on suicidal thoughts. This study aimed to compare efficacy and tolerability of ECT and ketamine for different depression outcomes (PROSPERO/CRD42022349220).

We searched MEDLINE, Web of Science, Embase, PsycINFO, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library and trial registries, which were the ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, without restrictions on publication date.

randomized controlled trials or cohorts comparing ketamine versus ECT in patients with TRD.

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria (of 2875 retrieved). Random-effects models comparing ketamine and ECT regarding the following outcomes were conducted: a) reduction of depressive symptoms severity through scales, g = -0.12, p = 0.68; b) response to therapy, RR = 0.89, p = 0.51; c) reported side-effects: dissociative symptoms, RR = 5.41, p = 0.06; nausea, RR = 0.73, p = 0.47; muscle pain, RR = 0.25, p = 0.02; and headache, RR = 0.39, p = 0.08. Influential & subgroup analyses were performed.

Methodological issues with high risk of bias in some of the source material, reduced number of eligible studies with high in-between heterogeneity and small sample sizes.

Our study showed no evidence to support the superiority of ketamine over ECT for severity of depressive symptoms and response to therapy. Regarding side effects, there was a statistically significant decreased risk of muscle pain in patients treated with ketamine compared to ECT.

The impact of suicide on our societies, mental healthcare, and public health is beyond questionable. Every year approximately 700 000 lives are lost due to suicide around the world (WHO, 2021); more people die by suicide than by homicide and war. Although suicide is a key issue and reducing suicide mortality is a global imperative, suicide is a highly complex biopsychosocial phenomenon, and in spite of several suicidal models developed in recent years and a high number of suicide risk factors identified, we still have neither a sufficient understanding of underpinnings of suicide nor adequate management strategies to reduce its prevalence. The present paper first overviews the background of suicidal behavior including its epidemiology, prevalence, age and gender correlations and its association with neuropsychiatric disorders as well as its clinical assessment. Then we give an overview of the etiological background, including its biopsychosocial contexts, genetics and neurobiology. Based on the above, we then provide a critical overview of the currently available intervention options to manage and reduce risk of suicide, including psychotherapeutic modalities, traditional medication classes also providing an up-to-date overview on the antisuicidal effects of lithium, as well as novel molecules such as esketamine and emerging medications and further molecules in development. Finally we give a critical overview on our current knowledge on using neuromodulatory and biological therapies, such as ECT, rTMS, tDCS and other options.

The current article is a comprehensive overview of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for treatment-resistant depression (TRD), especially with suicidality and psychosis. Common misconceptions and stigma associated with ECT are discussed. Major depressive disorder, one of the most prevalent lifetime mental disorders, is often associated with significant impairments that impacts one's ability to function. Antidepressants may be efficacious in treating depression; however, approximately one third of individuals do not respond to psychotropic medications. Therefore, other treatment options, such as ECT, must be considered for those who do not respond to medications, have psychosis, or are suicidal. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, xx(x), xx-xx.].

Asystole presenting at the start of electrical stimulus application during electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a relatively common occurrence. It is most likely caused by vagal nerve stimulation, affecting autonomic cardiac tone. This article reviews the effect of the electrode placement (EP) on the incidence and severity of bradycardia and asystole. A systematic literature review was conducted using the Embase and PubMed databases, up to September 2021, searching for studies evaluating the effect of EP on bradycardia and/or asystole during ECT. Nine case reports describing asystole in patients receiving ECT almost exclusively reported the association with bitemporal (BT) EP. One small descriptive study found no significant effect of EP on cardiac pauses. The results from 4 cohort studies, however, suggest that a right unilateral placement bears a higher risk for developing bradycardia and asystole than BT and bifrontal ECT. The available evidence suggests that right unilateral ECT holds a greater risk for the development of bradycardia and asystole than BT and bifrontal EP.

The aims of the study were to report the case of a 54-year-old man with recurrent depressive disorder with multiple medical comorbidities having a dual-chamber pacemaker, treated successfully with 11 sessions of electroconvulsive therapy, and to conduct a systematic review of published cases documenting the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) for treating major psychiatric disorders.

We searched electronic databases (MEDLINE, PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, and Crossref) and included studies reporting on the use of electroconvulsive therapy in patients with CIEDs.

Thirty-five publications across 53 years (1967-2021) reported on 76 patients (including current report) who received a pooled total of 979 modified ECT sessions. The most common adverse events were premature ventricular contraction and hypertension. There have been no reports of serious adverse effects that necessitated the cessation of ECT.

Electroconvulsive therapy is a safe and efficacious treatment for major psychiatric disorders, and the presence of CIEDs should not delay or deter the use of ECT in these patients.

At a time when innovations in psychiatry are booming, particularly in the field of medical devices, we thought it necessary, as members of French Society for Biological Psychiatry and Neuropsychopharmacology (AFPBN), to reconsider one of the oldest medical devices in psychiatry: the ECT apparatus. First, we recall the regulatory aspects of ECT. National guidelines define means of implementation and conditions of administration of ECT. Second, we remind of the indications and levels of evidence of ECT in the main psychiatric disorders, including catatonia. Then, we synthetize the place of ECT alongside other brain stimulation therapies, especially repetitive Trancranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). Furthermore, we explain the general effects of ECT: increased neuronal plasticity and neurogenesis, enhancement of the stress axis, resistance to oxidative stress, improved vascular endothelial function, activation of microglia and astrocytes, decrease in inflammatory events by upregulation of neuroinflammatory cytokines, and production of mitochondrial ATP. These effects appear from the first sessions and continue during the course of ECT treatment, suggesting activation of endogenous neuroprotection. Finally, we remember that most patients perform as well or better on neuropsychological assessments after ECT, relative to pre-ECT results, and this improvement continues over the following months. Memory disorders reported post-ECT are not all attributable to ECT. They may be subjective in nature or linked to residual depressive (and possibly comorbid neurogenerative) symptoms later attributed to ECT, on the basis of preexisting negative representations. We urgently need to reemphasize the crucial role of ECT in psychiatric treatment strategies as well as the need to update ECT recommendations.

Bipolar disorders are clinically complex, chronic and recurrent disorders. Few treatment options are effective across hypomanic, manic, depressive and mixed states and as continuation or maintenance treatment after initial symptom remission. The aim of this review was to provide an up-to-date overview of research on the efficacy, tolerability and cognitive effects of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), magnetic seizure therapy (MST), deep brain stimulation (DBS) and vagus nerve stimulation (VNS).

References included in this review were identified through multiple searches of the Embase, PubMed/MEDLINE and APA PsycINFO electronic databases for articles published from inception until February 2022. Published reviews, meta-analyses, randomised controlled trials and recent studies were prioritised to provide a comprehensive and up-to-date overview of research on brain stimulation in patients with bipolar disorders.

The evidence base for brain stimulation as an add-on or alternative to pharmacological and psychological treatments in patients with bipolar disorders is limited but rapidly expanding. Brain stimulation treatments represent an opportunity to treat all bipolar disorder states, including cognitive dysfunction during euthymic periods.

Whilst findings to date have been encouraging, larger randomised controlled trials with long-term follow-up are needed to clarify important questions regarding treatment efficacy and tolerability, the frequency of treatment-emergent affective switches and effects on cognitive function.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used to treat severe psychiatric disorders and is associated with reduced risk of suicide and all-cause mortality in patients with severe depression. We investigated the causes of death occurring shortly after ECT and identified potential risk factors for medical causes of death.

Patients treated with ECT between 2012 and 2018 were included in this Swedish register-based study. Multivariate binary logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios for covariates to determine potential predictors of 30-day mortality.

Of the 20,225 included patients, 93 (0.46 %) died of suicide and 123 (0.61 %) died of medical causes after ECT. Cardiovascular disease was the most common medical cause of death (n = 49, 40 %). An older age, a Charlson Comorbidity Index of 1 or more, atrial fibrillation, kidney disease, reflux disease, dementia, and cancer were associated with increased risk of death by medical causes.

Real-life observational studies based on registry data may demonstrate associations, but cannot determine causality. If medical records had been available, we would be better able to determine if deaths were due to the ECT, anesthesia, pre-existing medical conditions, or the mental disorder.

ECT appears to be a low-risk medical procedure. Older individuals with severe somatic diseases have the highest risk of death and extra measures should be considered to optimize their medical health during the pre-ECT workup, and during and after ECT.

The mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effect and cognitive side effects of Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) remain elusive. The measurement of cerebral perfusion provides an insight into brain physiology.

We investigated ECT-related perfusion changes in depressed patients and tested whether these changes correlate with clinical effects.

A sample of 22 in-patients was examined at three time points: 1) within two days before, 2) within one week after, and 3) six months after an ECT series. Cerebral perfusion was quantified using arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging. The primary regions of interest were the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortices (DL-PFC) and hippocampi. The depression severity was assessed by the six-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, and cognitive performance by the Screen for Cognitive Impairment in Psychiatry. A linear mixed model and partial correlation were used for statistical analyses.

Following an ECT series, perfusion decreased in the right (-6.0%, p = .01) and left DL-PFC (-5.6%, p = .001). Perfusion increased in the left hippocampus (4.8%, p = .03), while on the right side the increase was insignificant (2.3%, p = .23). A larger perfusion reduction in the right DL-PFC correlated with a better antidepressant effect, and a larger perfusion increase in the right hippocampus with worse cognitive impairment.

ECT-induced attenuation of prefrontal activity may be related to clinical improvement, whereas a hippocampal process triggered by the treatment is likely associated with cognitive side effects.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is provided for patients with severe and often life-threatening illness, who lack decision making capacity to consent to treatment (DMC-T) in clinical settings.

The aim of this study is to summarize previous studies investigating clinical outcomes of ECT in patients lacking DMC-T.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting clinical outcomes of ECT in patients lacking DMC-T with any psychiatric diagnoses was conducted. The primary outcome was clinical improvement. Secondary outcomes were cognitive outcomes and six month readmission rate. Hedges' g and odds ratios were calculated using a random-effects model. The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/rxjkm).

Of 3552 identified articles, 41 studies (n = 1299) were included. Approximately 80% of patients lacking DMC-T responded to ECT, and part of the patients regained capacity to consent and consented to further treatment with ECT. A total of seven studies (n = 1081) were included for meta-analysis. Patients without DMC-T showed superior clinical improvement and less cognitive side effects compared with those with DMC-T, whereas the groups did not show any difference in readmission rate. Several clinical characteristics at baseline and ECT techniques were significantly different between the groups.

ECT is equally, if not superiorly, effective in patients lacking DMC-T compared to patients with DMC-T. ECT can potentially enhance patients' autonomy, without increasing the risk of cognitive side effects. These results support the clinical and ethical legitimacy of ECT provision for patients with the most severe illness who lack DMC-T at start of treatment.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is a widely used treatment for bipolar depression; however, evidence of its effectiveness is not sufficient. This study therefore aimed to evaluate whether early ECT is associated with reduced length of hospital stay.

In this retrospective cohort study using the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, we identified patients admitted for bipolar depression between April 2010 and March 2018. The primary outcome was length of hospital stay, and the secondary outcome was clinical outcomes and total hospitalization costs. Propensity score-matched analyses were performed to compare the outcomes between patients who received ECT within 8 days of admission (early ECT group) and those who did not (control group).

We identified 5941 eligible patients, comprising 219 in the early ECT group and 5722 in the control group. After 1:4 propensity score matching, patients in the early ECT group had significantly shorter lengths of hospital stay than those in the control group (53 days in the early ECT group and 73 days in the control group; difference: -20.2 days; 95 % confidence interval: -29.2 to -11.2 days). There was no significant difference in total hospitalization costs between the two groups. In-hospital mortality and fatal complications were rare in both groups. The result was similar in the sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting.

Our study was limited by retrospective design and the possibility of unmeasured confounders.

Early ECT was associated with reduced length of hospital stay without increasing total hospitalization costs in patients with bipolar depression.

The degree of efficacy, safety, quality, and certainty of meta-analytic evidence of biological non-pharmacological treatments in mental disorders is unclear.

We conducted an umbrella review (PubMed/Cochrane Library/PsycINFO-04-Jul-2021, PROSPERO/CRD42020158827) for meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on deep brain stimulation (DBS), transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), electro-convulsive therapy (ECT), and others. Co-primary outcomes were standardized mean differences (SMD) of disease-specific symptoms, and acceptability (for all-cause discontinuation). Evidence was assessed with AMSTAR/AMSTAR-Content/GRADE.

We selected 102 meta-analyses. Effective interventions compared to sham were in depressive disorders: ECT (SMD=0.91/GRADE=moderate), TMS (SMD=0.51/GRADE=moderate), tDCS (SMD=0.46/GRADE=low), DBS (SMD=0.42/GRADE=very low), light therapy (SMD=0.41/GRADE=low); schizophrenia: ECT (SMD=0.88/GRADE=moderate), tDCS (SMD=0.45/GRADE=very low), TMS (prefrontal theta-burst, SMD=0.58/GRADE=low; left-temporoparietal, SMD=0.42/GRADE=low); substance use disorder: TMS (high frequency-dorsolateral-prefrontal-deep (SMD=1.16/GRADE=moderate), high frequency-left dorsolateral-prefrontal (SMD=0.77/GRADE=very low); OCD: DBS (SMD=0.89/GRADE=moderate), TMS (SMD=0.64/GRADE=very low); PTSD: TMS (SMD=0.46/GRADE=moderate); generalized anxiety disorder: TMS (SMD=0.68/GRADE=low); ADHD: tDCS (SMD=0.23/GRADE=moderate); autism: tDCS (SMD=0.97/GRADE=very low). No significant differences for acceptability emerged. Median AMSTAR/AMSTAR-Content was 8/2 (suggesting high-quality meta-analyses/low-quality RCTs), GRADE low.

Despite limited certainty, biological non-pharmacological interventions are effective and safe for numerous mental conditions. Results inform future research, and guidelines.

None.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the most effective non-pharmacological treatment for treatment-resistant depression (TRD) but can expose to transient cognitive impairments. Understanding factors underlying these cognitive side effects is important. This study investigated the impact of anticholinergic treatments on cognitive performances after ECT courses for TRD in naturalistic condition.

Impact of anticholinergic burden (Anticholinergic Impregnation Scale, AIS) on cognitive changes (Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA) adjusted on depression level (Montgomery and Asberg Depression Scale, MADRS) was investigated in 42 patients who received an ECT course between 2017 and 2020 for unipolar or bipolar TRD. Collection of daily treatments given during ECT was carried out via the computerized traceability of treatments validated by nurses.

Among the 31 treatments identified with an anticholinergic score, which represent only 38% of total treatments, the three most frequently given treatments were Lorazepam (47%), Venlafaxine (36%) and Cyamemazine (26%). Delayed recall was the most frequently impaired cognitive function after ECT courses. Using logistic regression, we found no association between the anticholinergic burden and the decrease in cognitive scores after ECT courses, adjusted on MADRS score evolution (p > 0.1). Conversely, improvement in MADRS scores were correlated with improvement in attention MoCA subscores.

This is a retrospective monocentric study with a moderate sample size using anticholinergic scales to calculate the anticholinergic burden without plasma dosage.

Anticholinergic treatments did not seem to explain ECT-related cognitive impairments. This warrants further large prospective investigations including different measures of anticholinergic burden.

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) is a problematic and prevalent public health and societal concern. Although electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is the gold standard TRD intervention, the treatment evokes apprehension due to public perceptions, feasibility, and tolerability. Despite significant medical advancements, few medications have been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for TRD. In 2019, intranasal esketamine, the S-isomer of racemic ketamine, was approved for TRD, garnering significant excitement about the potential for the drug to act as an alternative treatment to ECT.

The goal of this narrative review is to compare the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of ketamine and ECT; clarify whether ketamine is a reasonable alternative to ECT; and to facilitate improved treatment assignment for TRD. Empirical quantitative and qualitative studies and national and international guidelines these treatments are reviewed.

: The field awaits the results of two ongoing large comparative effectiveness trials of ECT and IV ketamine for TRD, which should help guide clinicians and patients as to the relative risk and benefit of these interventions. Over the next five years we anticipate further innovations in neuromodulation and in drug development which broadly aim to develop more tolerable versions of ECT and ketamine, respectively.

To examine whether electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is associated with risk of mortality and acute somatic events in patients with or without somatic comorbidity.

A total of 174,495 patients with an affective disorder, of whom 41% had somatic comorbidity, were followed from 2005 through 2018 for ECT, mortality, and acute somatic outcomes using Danish registers. The association of ECT with outcomes was estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression.

Patients, of whom 6943 (4.0%) had ECT, were followed for a median of 6.7 years. Compared to non-ECT treated patients, ECT was associated with a lower risk of death from natural causes, which was independent of somatic comorbidity. ECT was not associated with the risk of acute somatic events neither in patients with somatic comorbidity nor in patients without somatic comorbidity, except for cardiac events within 0-30 days of follow-up after the first ECT, for which there was a 3.7-fold higher risk in patients with no somatic comorbidity. This analysis, however, was based on few events.

In modern clinical practice, in patients with affective disorders and somatic comorbidity, ECT is not associated with a higher risk of death from natural causes or acute somatic events.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for depressive disorders and approved for use in adolescents and adults, but it is unclear whether efficacy or cognitive side effect burden differs with age or if effectiveness in usual clinical practice matches that in prospective studies. We examined the effects of ECT on depression and cognition in a large clinical cohort.

A retrospective cohort study of patients ages 16 and older receiving ECT between 2011 and 2020 and who were evaluated with the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology (QIDS), the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale-24 (BASIS-24), and the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) at baseline and after treatment #10.

Among 1698 patients, ECT was associated with a decrease in depression symptoms (QIDS reduction from 17.1 ± 4.9 to 10.1 ± 5.2) and improvement in self-reported mental health (BASIS-24 scores improved from 1.92 ± 0.55 to 1.17 ± 0.60). There was a reduction in MoCA scores from 25.8 ± 3.1 to 25.4 ± 3.1. In multivariate models, age was not associated with a differential QIDS or BASIS-24 response, but older age was associated with a lesser reduction in MoCA.

Among 1698 patients aged 16 and older, ECT was associated with improvement in depression and overall self-reported mental health, with a slight decrease in cognition. Age was not associated with changes in efficacy, but older age was associated with a lesser cognitive change as measured by the MoCA. These results provide normative data of real-world effectiveness of ECT, and add further support to its utility in patients with severe psychiatric illness.

Eighty years ago, schizophrenia was the first indication for electroconulsive therapy (ECT), and likewise ECT was one of the first treatments used for schizophrenia. This paper presents the history of ECT in the treatment of schizophrenia and its evolution, from it's discovery in the 20th century, which is an example of empiricism with a sequence of "shock" therapies. Following this discovery, the use ECT in schizophrenia has been in expansion during several decades, in a context of lack of efficacy of the treatment in schizophrenia. Then, after World War II and the derivative use of ECT in Germany, the use of ECT has decline during several decades. However, in the last decades, the use of ECT in schizophrenia has reemerged. Indeed, among patients in schizophrenia, rates of resistance to treatment have always been and still are high. In 2017, the concept of "ultra-treatment resistant schizophrenia" was defined when clozapine was tried and failed; and ECT, that had been long since abandoned in the treatment of schizophrenia until recent renewed interest, has emerged especially concerning the add-on of ECT to clozapine. However, ECT remains highly stigmatized and underutilized. This article looks at the history of the practice of ECT in schizophrenia with a historical and clinical approach and makes connections between the history of the treatment and its influence on its current recommendation and practice.

Background: Extensive research has reported that electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be highly effective in approximately 80% of patients suffering from depression. Its clinical use is mainly limited by historical objections and the concern about unwanted adverse effects (AEs), including serious and potentially life-threatening adverse events (pLTAEs), induced either by ECT or by anesthesia. Objective risk estimation is, therefore, a decisive factor in determining an indication for ECT. Methods: This paper presents a retrospective analysis of 3-year safety protocols and patient files of 157 patients who received a total of 3,106 ECT applications in a psychiatric inpatient setting at a psychiatric community hospital. This patient group comprises 5.3% of inpatients admitted with comparable diagnoses. Adverse events were analyzed from standardized safety protocols and patient files with a focus on pLTAEs. Results: Adverse events were reported for 30 (19.1%) of the 157 participants during 39 (6.1%) of 641 hospital stays. Serious pLTAEs occurred during three electroconvulsive stimulations in three patients, who needed action through the administration of medication or mechanical respiration. No patient suffered permanent damage to health, and no patient died. The incidence of these and other AEs was independent of sex, age, and diagnosis of patients, and anesthesia medication. Minor AEs occurred more often with higher stimulus doses and an increasing number of treatments. Conclusion: The low incidence rate of 0.097% of serious pLTAEs that require medical action may allow the conclusion that ECT is a rather safe treatment when performed in a controlled setting. The beneficial risk profile of ECT performed in the standard care of psychiatric hospitals suggests a more generous indication of this treatment method. We recommend that ECT facilities collect individual safety data to allow a reliable judgment of their institutional ECT risk profile.

The primary aim of this study was to describe a Portuguese nationwide epidemiological perspective on the use of electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) in hospitalized psychiatric patients. The secondary aims of the study were to characterize clinical and sociodemographic trends of hospitalized patients treated with ECT.

A retrospective-observational study was conducted using an administrative database gathering every registered Portuguese public hospital hospitalizations from 2008 to 2015. We selected all hospitalizations with a procedure code 94.27 (Other electroshock therapy) defined by the International Classification of Diseases version 9, Clinical Modification. Variables included birth date, sex, address, primary and secondary diagnoses, admission/discharge date, length of stay, and discharge status from each single hospitalization episode. We also calculated Portugal's inpatient ECT prevalence rate (iP%).

There were a total of 879 registered hospitalizations with ECT within the 8-year period of this study. Most occurred in female patients (53.4%), belonging to the age group of 51 to 70 years old, with a mean age of 50.5 years. The median length of stay was 43.0 days with an interquartile range of 27.0 to 68.0. The most frequent primary diagnosis was major depressive disorder, recurrent episode, representing 19.6% of all hospitalizations. The iP% for the study period was 0.71%.

In Portugal, most of the patients who received ECT were women above middle age, and depressive disorders were the most common indication. Portugal's iP% represents a low rate when compared with other European countries, which might indicate an underutilization of ECT in Portuguese psychiatric hospitals.

Severe depression is associated with an increased risk of developing dementia, however, whether treatment with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) modify this risk remains unknown.

In this matched cohort study, 1089 consecutive in-patients with affective disorders, receiving ECT during the period 1982 to 2000, were matched with 3011 in-patients with affective disorders not treated with ECT (non-ECT), and 108,867 individuals randomly selected from the background population. The comparison cohorts were matched on sex, age, and the non-ECT cohort was further matched according to diagnoses and admission period and hospital. Dementia diagnoses were retrieved from the national patient health registry. Analyses were adjusted for disease severity, somatic, and psychiatric comorbidities.

The cumulative incidence of dementia was 13.45% (10.75-16.46%) in the ECT cohort after 34 years of follow-up, 10.53% (8.5-12.81%) in the non-ECT cohort, and 8.43% (8.17-8.7%) in the background cohort. Using the ECT cohort as reference and age as the underlying time scale, the adjusted hazard ratio of developing dementia was 0.73 (0.52-1.04) in the non-ECT cohort and 0.61 (0.49-0.76) in the background cohort. The stratified analysis based on age at index (<65 years; 65-80 years; >80 years) found no age-related difference in the risk of developing dementia between the ECT cohort and non-ECT cohort.

The ECT treatment of affective disorders was not associated with an increased long-term risk of developing dementia compared with in-patients with affective disorders not treated with ECT.

Right unilateral brief pulse (RUL-BP) electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been adopted as a technique for reducing the cognitive side effects of ECT relative to sine wave or bilateral treatments, but it is unknown how often patients are transitioned to alternative electrode placements. This study analyzes time in first lifetime acute course RUL-BP ECT.

A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted of adult patients receiving a first lifetime course of ECT from 2000 to 2017 beginning with individualized seizure threshold determination using RUL-BP treatment parameters.

A total of 1383 patients met study criteria and received a mean number of 9.4 ± 3.1 treatments, of which 7.6 ± 3.3 were using RUL-BP stimuli. Only 37.5% of patients were transitioned from RUL to bilateral treatments. Younger patients and those diagnosed with bipolar disorder were more likely to transition from RUL-BP to bilateral treatments, but the overall number of treatments did not differ based on age or primary diagnosis.

Among patients who begin treatment with RUL-BP ECT, more than 60% use exclusively those parameters throughout their acute course.

Treatment resistant mood disorders (TRMD) have a significant impact on patients and society. Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) has been shown to be effective for treatment resistant depression (TRD). Despite the effectiveness and safety of ECT, there remains significant stigma surrounding its use. Studies worldwide have shown that many medical students receive their knowledge from the media, which often portrays ECT in a negative light, and very few have exposure to ECT prior to their psychiatric clinical rotations. In this article we highlight the importance of medical education and introduce a novel approach in helping to fight the stigma of ECT through educational intervention for medical trainees that combines active, longitudinal and theoretical learning. By ensuring that trainees have a robust education in this arena, we can help them educate patients about treatment options, improve confidence in prescribing and administering these therapies, and ultimately improve patient and societal outcomes.

Depression is a prevalent psychiatric disorder that often leads to poor quality of life and impaired functioning. Treatment during the acute phase of a major depressive episode aims to help the patient reach a remission state and eventually return to their baseline level of functioning. Pharmacotherapy, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors antidepressants, remains the most frequent option for treating depression during the acute phase, while other promising pharmacological options are still competing for the attention of practitioners. Depression-focused psychotherapy is the second most common option for helping patients overcome the acute phase, maintain remission, and prevent relapses. Electroconvulsive therapy is the most effective somatic therapy for depression in some specific situations; meanwhile, other methods have limits, and their specific indications are still being studied. Combining medications, psychotherapy, and somatic therapies remains the most effective way to manage resistant forms of depression.

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is commonly used in the elderly due to its proven efficacy and safety profile. However, presence of cardiovascular comorbidities such as cerebral aneurysms may complicate the course of treatment. Our knowledge about the possible risk factors and precautionary measures remains limited.

We performed a systematic review of published case reports of elderly patients with cerebral aneurysms treated with ECT.

A total of 11 cases were included for the review. One patient died because of subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) secondary to ictal hypertensive surge during treatment with ECT.

Risk factors such as history of hypertension, age of the patient, extent of the ictal surge in blood pressure, efficacy of prophylactic treatment to control surge in blood pressure and characteristics of cerebral aneurysm each elevated the risk of complication in these cases. We reviewed safety measures based on the evidence from the current literature available.

ECT is safe in elderly patients with cerebral aneurysms provided appropriate safety measures are employed. Screening for cerebral aneurysms in high risk patients, effective prevention and management of blood pressure elevation acutely during ECT is the best practice to avoid adverse outcomes.

There are limited studies examining mortality associated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT), and many studies do not include a control group or method to identify all patient deaths.

We aimed to evaluate the risk of death associated with ECT treatments over 30 days and 1 year.

We conducted a study analysing electronic medical record data from the Department of Veterans Affairs healthcare system between 2000 and 2017. We compared mortality among patients who received ECT with a matched group of patients created through propensity score matching.

Our sample included 123 479 individual ECT treatments provided to 8720 patients (including 5157 initial index courses of ECT). Mortality associated with individual ECT treatments was 3.08 per 10 000 treatments over the first 7 days after treatment. When comparing patients who received ECT with a matched group of mental health patients, those receiving ECT had a relative odds of all-cause mortality in the year after their index course of 0.87 (95% CI 0.79-1.11; P = 0.10), and a relative risk of death from causes other than suicide of 0.79 (95% CI 0.66-0.95; P < 0.01). The similar relative odds of all-cause mortality in the first 30 days after ECT was 1.06 (95% CI 0.65-1.73) for all-cause mortality, and 1.02 (95% CI 0.58-1.8) for all-cause mortality excluding suicide deaths.

There was no evidence of elevated or excess mortality after ECT. There was some indication that mortality may be reduced in patients receiving ECT compared with similar patients who do not receive ECT.

Electroconvulsive therapy is the most effective treatment for severe, psychotic or treatment-resistant depression. However, its effectiveness continues to be questioned, both in mainstream media and narratives within the scientific literature. In this analysis, we use an evidence-based approach to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of modern electroconvulsive therapy.