1
|
Hsieh CC, Li CC, Juan YS, Li WM, Wu WJ, Chien TM. Impact of dialysis on intravesical recurrence and survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial cancer patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy. Ren Fail 2025; 47:2458762. [PMID: 39920881 PMCID: PMC11809166 DOI: 10.1080/0886022x.2025.2458762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2024] [Revised: 01/13/2025] [Accepted: 01/21/2025] [Indexed: 02/09/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) presents a significant recurrence risk following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Patients on dialysis may experience unique clinical trajectories due to uremic states and altered immune responses. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of dialysis on intravesical recurrence and survival outcomes in patients with UTUC undergoing RNU, and to identify predictive factors influencing prognosis. METHODS A retrospective cohort study analyzed 402 patients with non-metastatic UTUC treated with RNU between 2001 and 2014. Patients were stratified into dialysis (n = 66) and non-dialysis (n = 336) groups. Survival and recurrence outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. RESULTS Dialysis patients were predominantly female, younger, and exhibited less advanced pathological tumor stages. Dialysis was associated with higher intravesical recurrence rates (p = 0.009), which were largely attributable to a history of bladder cancer (42.4% vs. 26.5%; p = 0.009). After adjustment for bladder cancer history, dialysis was not an independent predictor of bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS). Advanced pT stages (HR: 3.9, p = 0.012) and prior bladder cancer were the primary factors influencing BRFS. CONCLUSIONS Dialysis does not independently worsen surgical outcomes or BRFS in UTUC patients post-RNU when accounting for prior bladder cancer. Prognostic models should integrate these findings to enhance individualized surveillance and treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chi-Chun Hsieh
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Gangshan Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Shun Juan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Gangshan Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Tsu-Ming Chien
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Gangshan Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- Department of Urology, School of Postbaccalaureate Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Massari M, O'Malley P, Benidir T, Su LM, Gao H, Crispen PL. Efficacy of BCG for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer following nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:289.e7-289.e12. [PMID: 38802293 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 04/17/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of intravesical (IVe) Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) to treat non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) recurrences in patients who have previously undergone nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). METHODS We performed a single institution retrospective review of patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for UTUC from 2009 to 2021. Patients who subsequently developed NMIBC treated with transurethral resection followed by IVe BCG were included in the study group. A control cohort was formed by retrospective review of patents with primary NMIBC treated with BCG during the same period. Patients in the control cohort were matched by stage of bladder cancer at a 2:1 ratio of control to study subjects. Demographic data, pathology of bladder tumors prior to and following BCG, use of maintenance BCG (mBCG), time to recurrence, time to progression, progression to cystectomy, and progression to metastatic disease were collected on all patients. Descriptive statistics were utilized to compare the 2 groups. The primary outcome was progression to muscle invasive disease. Secondary outcomes included intravesical recurrence free survival, disease free survival, and progression to metastatic disease. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to elucidate independent variables associated with bladder tumor recurrence. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess the impact of prior UTUC on time to bladder tumor recurrence. RESULTS One-hundred and ninety-one patients underwent nephroureterectomy at our institution from 2009 to 2021 for UTUC. Twenty-five patients were identified to have subsequently developed NMIBC recurrences treated with inductions BCG. The control group was comprised of 50 patients with primary NMIBC matched by stage of bladder cancer for which BCG was indicated in the study group. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) follow-up was significantly longer in the control group relative to the study group (64.8 [50.1-85.6] vs 25 months [17-35]; P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in demographics between the study and control groups. The rate of progression to muscle invasive disease was 17% vs 0% in the study group and control group respectively (P = 0.0521). History of UTUC was associated with increased risk of intravesical bladder tumor recurrence post BCG on multivariable analysis (HR 2.5; P = 0.017) and Kaplan Meier survival analysis (P = 0.039). The mean time to bladder tumor recurrence after treatment with BCG was significantly worse in the study group at (7.9 vs. 23.9 months; P = 0.0322). Similarly, the rate of progression to metastatic disease was worse in the study group (24% vs 2%; P = 0.0047). Overall disease-free survival was also noted to be significantly worse on Kaplan Meier survival analysis in the study group (P = 0.0074). No statistically significant differences in the stage grade of bladder tumor recurrence, grade of bladder tumor recurrence, or rate of progression to cystectomy were identified. CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests reduced efficacy of BCG for NMIBC in patients with a history of UTUC. Patients in this population should be counseled accordingly. Research into alternative treatments for bladder tumor recurrence and more aggressive prophylactic regimens after nephroureterectomy for prevention of bladder tumor recurrence in this population is encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Massari
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610.
| | - Padraic O'Malley
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Tarik Benidir
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Li-Ming Su
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Hanzhi Gao
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| | - Paul L Crispen
- Department of Urology, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Room N203, PO Box 100247, Gainesville, FL 32610
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chou SF, Lin WC, Chang H, Huang CP. Safety and oncological outcome of early intraoperative intravesicle mitomycin C vs. deferred instillation in patients receiving robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy. Front Surg 2024; 11:1366982. [PMID: 38726470 PMCID: PMC11079113 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1366982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Radical nephroureterectomy with concurrent bladder cuff excision (RNUBCE) is the gold standard surgical approach for high-risk primary upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Given the notably high incidence of bladder tumor recurrence following this procedure, this study aimed to evaluate the effect and safety of intraoperative mitomycin-C (MMC) instillation vs. deferred instillation on overall oncological outcomes following robot-assisted RNUBCE. Methods This is a retrospective chart review study. Patients with non-invasive (N0, not T3/T4) UTUC who underwent robotic RNUBCE combined an intraoperative MMC instillation or a deferred MMC instillation after surgery at a medical center in Taiwan between November 2013 and June 2020 were eligible for inclusion. Patients with prior bladder UC, carcinomas of other origins, received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and had undergone kidney transplantation were excluded. All surgeries were executed by a single surgical team under the guidance of the same surgeon. The primary outcomes was the risk of bladder tumor recurrence between patients received intraoperative (IO) vs. deferred MMC instillation postoperatively (PO) during one-year follow-up. The secondary outcome was postoperative adverse events assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine the associations between study variables and the outcomes. Results A total of 54 patients were included in the analysis. 12 (22.2%) patients experienced a bladder tumor recurrence during follow-up (IO: 7.7%, PO: 35.7%, p < 0.021). After adjustment in the multivariable, intraoperative MMC instillation was significantly associated with lower risk of bladder recurrence [adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.03-0.81, p = 0.028]. No MMC-related Clavien-Dindo Grade III-IV adverse events were found in either group. Conclusion IIntraoperative MMC instillation is safe and associated with a lower bladder tumor recurrence risk in patients undergoing robotic RNUBCE for UTUC than deferred instillation. Future large, prospective studies are still warranted to confirm the findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheng-Feng Chou
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ching Lin
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Han Chang
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Radiology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luo Z, Jiao B, Su C, Zhao H, Yan Y, Pan Y, Ren J, Zhang G, Ding Z. Correlation between the timing of diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper tract urothelial cancer and intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1122877. [PMID: 37035140 PMCID: PMC10073531 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1122877] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective We aimed to evaluate the effect of the timing of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Patients and methods The clinical data of 220 patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with RNU at our center from June 2010 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the timing of the URS, all patients were divided into three groups: the no URS group, the 1-session group (diagnostic URS immediately followed by RNU), and the 2-session group (RNU after diagnostic URS). Additionally, we analyzed IVR-free survival (IVRFS) using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional regression methods. Results The median follow-up period of these 220 patents was 41 (range: 2-143) months. Among them, 58 patients developed IVR following RNU. Kaplan-Meier curve displayed a significantly higher IVR rate in both treatment groups than in the no-URS group (p=0.025). In the subgroup of patients with renal pelvis cancer, the incidence of IVR was significantly higher in both treatment groups than in the group without URS (p=0.006). In univariate Cox proportional regression analysis, the two treatment groups were risk factors for IVR compared to the no-URS group [p=0.027, hazard ratio (HR): 1.93, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.08-3.46]. The two-stage group (p=0.032, HR: 1.98, 95% CI: 1.08-3.65), positive urine pathology (p<0.001, HR: 8.12, 95% CI: 3.63-18.15), adjuvant chemotherapy (p<0.001, HR: 0.20, 95% CI: 0.10-0.38), and positive margin (p<0.0001, HR: 7.50, 95% CI: 2.44-23.08) were all identified as independent predictors in the multivariate. Conclusion This study revealed that delayed RNU following diagnostic URS may increase the risk of postoperative IVR in patients with UTUC, preoperatively positive uropathology, and positive surgical margin were risk factors for IVR after RNU, while early postoperative chemotherapy may effectively prevent IVR. Delay of RUN after URS could increase the risk of IVR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenkai Luo
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Binbin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Caixia Su
- School of Public Health, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Hang Zhao
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yangxuanyu Yan
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Yijin Pan
- China-Japan Friendship School Clinical Medicine, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Jian Ren
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guan Zhang
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Zhenshan Ding,
| | - Zhenshan Ding
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
- *Correspondence: Guan Zhang, ; Zhenshan Ding,
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Assessment of Therapeutic Benefit and Option Strategy on Intravesical Instillation for Preventing Bladder Cancer Recurrence after Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2022; 2022:1755368. [PMID: 35677889 PMCID: PMC9170511 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1755368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 04/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC) is a very aggressive disease, characterized by 22%–50% of patients suffering from subsequent bladder recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Although the therapy of intravesical instillation is reported to be effective in preventing bladder recurrence, no study had been reported in Northeast China. The findings relating to the clinical effectiveness of intravesical instillation after RNU are somewhat controversial, and the best efficacy and least adverse effects of instillation drugs have not been widely accepted. Here, we aimed at evaluating the efficacy of intravesical instillation for the prevention intravesical recurrence systematically. Methods In this retrospective cohort study, from October 2006 to September 2017, 158 UUT-UC patients underwent RNU were divided into 4 groups: epirubicin (EPB) instillation group, hydroxycamptothecin (HCPT) instillation group, bacillus Calmette–Guerin (BCG) instillation group, and noninstillation group. Cox univariate and multivariate analyses were employed to identify the risk factors for intravesical recurrence-free survival (IVRFS). The nomogram model was also applied to predict patient outcomes. Subsequently, to evaluate the clinical significance of intravesical instillation comprehensively, several databases including PubMed, Ovid, and Embase were searched and data from published studies with our results were combined by direct meta-analysis. Moreover, a network meta-analysis comparing instillation therapies was conducted to evaluate the clinical efficacy of different instillation drugs. Results In our retrospective cohort study, the Kaplan–Meier survival curve demonstrated noninstillation groups were associated with worsened IVRFS. Meanwhile, multivariate analysis indicated that intravesical instillation was independent protective factors for IVRFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.731). Moreover, calibration plots, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC) values, and the C-index showed the priority of nomogram's predictive accuracy. Next, direct meta-analysis including 19 studies showed that intravesical instillation could prevent the recurrence of bladder cancer with a pooled risk ratio (RR) estimate of 0.53. Subgroup analysis by study type, year of intravesical recurrence, first instillation time, and instillation times also confirmed the robustness of the results. Moreover, intraoperative instillation was associated with a decrease in the risk of bladder recurrence compared with postoperative instillation. Then, a network meta-analysis including 7 studies indicated that pirarubicin (THP) (surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA] = 89.2%) is the most effective therapy to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence, followed by BCG (SUCRA = 83.5%), mitomycin C (MMC) (SUCRA = 53.6%), EPB (SUCRA = 52.6%), and HCPT (SUCRA = 5.1%) after the analysis of the value ranking. Conclusions A maintenance schedule of intravesical instillation prevents the recurrence of bladder cancer after RNU in UUT-UC patients effectively. Large, prospective trials are needed to further confirm its value. Compared with other chemotherapy regimens, THP may be a promising drug with favorable efficacy to prevent bladder recurrence. As included studies had moderate risk of bias, the results of network meta-analysis should be applied with caution.
Collapse
|
6
|
Chien TM, Li CC, Lu YM, Chou YH, Chang HW, Wu WJ. The Predictive Value of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index on Bladder Recurrence on Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Outcomes after Radical Nephroureterectomy. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225273. [PMID: 34830555 PMCID: PMC8623909 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2021] [Revised: 11/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to assess the prognostic significance of pre-treatment lymphocyte-related systemic inflammatory biomarkers in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients. METHODS This study included non-metastatic UTUC patients treated at our hospital between 2001 and 2013. The receiver operating characteristic curve was used to obtain the optimal neutrophile-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII). Multivariate logistic regression was performed to investigate the relationship between NLR, PLR, and SII and clinical pathologic characteristics. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and bladder recurrence-free survival (BRFS), and the log-rank test was used to compare the survival rate. RESULTS Overall, 376 patients were included in the current study. An elevated SII was associated with symptomatic hydronephrosis, bladder cancer history, advanced pathologic tumor stage, lymph node invasion, adjuvant chemotherapy and concomitant carcinoma in situ (CIS); high NLR was associated with older age, symptomatic hydronephrosis, hemodialysis status, anemia, multifocal tumor, advanced pathologic tumor stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy; and high PLR was associated with older age, anemia, advanced pathologic tumor stage, and adjuvant chemotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated that patients exhibiting higher NLR, PLR, and SII showed significantly poor MFS and CSS rates. Only high SII showed significantly worse BRFS rates. CONCLUSIONS The NLR, PLR, and SII were independent predictive factors for both MFS and CSS in UTUC patients. Among the factors, only elevated SII can predict bladder recurrence. Therefore, the patients might need close bladder monitoring during the follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsu-Ming Chien
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan; (T.-M.C.); (Y.-H.C.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
| | - Ching-Chia Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
| | - Yen-Man Lu
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung 80145, Taiwan
| | - Yii-Her Chou
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan; (T.-M.C.); (Y.-H.C.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
| | - Hsueh-Wei Chang
- Department of Biomedical Science and Environmental Biology, College of Life Science, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Cancer Center, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80708, Taiwan
- Correspondence: (H.-W.C.); (W.-J.W.); Tel.: +886-7-312-1101 (ext. 2691) (H.-W.C.); +886-7-320-8212 (W.-J.W.)
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan; (T.-M.C.); (Y.-H.C.)
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 80756, Taiwan;
- Correspondence: (H.-W.C.); (W.-J.W.); Tel.: +886-7-312-1101 (ext. 2691) (H.-W.C.); +886-7-320-8212 (W.-J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
İzol V, Deger M, Ozden E, Bolat D, Argun B, Baltaci S, Celik O, Akgul HM, Tinay İ, Bayazit Y. The Effect of Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy on Intravesical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Tract Urinary Carcinoma. Urol Int 2020; 105:291-297. [PMID: 33264798 DOI: 10.1159/000511650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of diagnostic ureterorenoscopy (URS) prior to radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) on intravesical recurrence (IVR), in patients with primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective analysis of 354 patients, who underwent RNU for UTUC from 10 urology centers between 2005 and 2019, was performed. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of IVR after RNU. Patients were divided into URS prior to RNU (Group 1) and no URS prior to RNU (Group 2). Rates of IVR after RNU were compared, and a Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate potential predictors of IVR. RESULTS After exclusion, a total of 194 patients were analyzed: Group 1 n = 95 (49.0%) and Group 2 n = 99 (51.0%). In Group 1, a tumor biopsy and histopathological confirmation during URS were performed in 58 (61.1%). The mean follow-up was 39.17 ± 39.3 (range 12-250) months. In 54 (27.8%) patients, IVR was recorded after RNU, and the median recurrence time within the bladder was 10.0 (3-144) months. IVR rate was 38.9% in Group 1 versus 17.2% in Group 2 (p = 0.001). In Group 1, IVR rate was 43.1% in those undergoing intraoperative biopsy versus 32.4% of patients without biopsy during diagnostic URS (p =0.29). Intravesical recurrence-free survival (IRFS) was longer in Group 2 compared to Group 1 (median IRFS was 111 vs. 60 months in Groups 2 and 1, respectively (p< 0.001)). Univariate analysis revealed that IRFS was significantly associated with URS prior to RNU (HR: 2.9, 95% CI 1.65-5.41; p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, URS prior to RNU (HR: 3.5, 95% CI 1.74-7.16; p < 0.001) was found to be an independent prognostic factor for IRFS. CONCLUSION Diagnostic URS was associated with the poor IRFS following RNU for primary UTUC. The decision for a diagnostic URS with or without tumor biopsy should be reserved for cases where this information might influence further treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Volkan İzol
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | - Mutlu Deger
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey,
| | - Ender Ozden
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ondokuz Mayıs University, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Deniz Bolat
- Department of Urology, Bozyaka Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Burak Argun
- Department of Urology, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sumer Baltaci
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Orcun Celik
- Department of Urology, Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey
| | - Hacı Murat Akgul
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Tekirdag Namık Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey
| | - İlker Tinay
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Yildirim Bayazit
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lai SC, Wu PJ, Liu JY, Seery S, Liu SJ, Long XB, Liu M, Wang JY. Oncological impact of different distal ureter managements during radical nephroureterectomy for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:5104-5115. [PMID: 33269247 PMCID: PMC7674733 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i21.5104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current standard surgical treatment for non-metastatic upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff excision (BCE). Typically, BCE techniques are classified in one of the following three categories: An open technique described as intrasvesical incision of the bladder cuff, a transurethral incision of the bladder cuff (TUBC), and an extravesical incision of the bladder cuff (EVBC) method. Even though each of these management techniques are widely used, there is no consensus about which surgical intervention is superior, with the best oncologic outcomes.
AIM To investigate the oncological outcomes of three BCE methods during RNU for primary UTUC patients.
METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the data of 248 primary UTUC patients, who underwent RNU with BCE between January 2004 to December 2018. Patients were analyzed according to each BCE method. Data extracted included patient demographics, perioperative parameters, and oncological outcomes. Statistical analyses were performed using chi-square and log-rank tests. The Cox proportional hazards regression model was utilized to identify independent predictors. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS Of the 248 participants, 39.9% (n = 99) underwent intrasvesical incision of the bladder cuff, 38.7% (n = 96) EVBC, and 21.4% (n = 53) TUBC. At a median follow-up of 44.2 mo, bladder recurrence developed in 17.2%, 12.5%, and 13.2% of the cases, respectively. Cancer-specific deaths occurred in 11.1%, 5.2%, and 7.5% of patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival curves with a log-rank test highlighted no significant differences in intravesical recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival among these approaches with P values of 0.987, 0.825, and 0.497, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed that the lower ureter location appears to have inferior intravesical recurrence-free survival (P = 0.042). However, cancer-specific survival and overall survival were independently influenced by tumor stage (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.439; 95% confidence interval: 2.424-29.377; P = 0.001) and lymph node status (HR = 14.343; 95%CI: 5.176-39.745; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION All three techniques had comparable outcomes; although, EVBC and TUBC are minimally invasive. While based upon rather limited data, these findings will support urologists in blending experience with evidence to inform patient choices. However, larger, rigorously designed, multicenter studies with long term outcomes are still required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi-Cong Lai
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Peng-Jie Wu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jian-Yong Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Samuel Seery
- School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Sheng-Jie Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Xing-Bo Long
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Ming Liu
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| | - Jian-Ye Wang
- Department of Urology, Beijing Hospital, National Center of Gerontology, Institute of Geriatric Medicine, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kwon SY, Ko YH, Song PH, Kim BH, Kim BS, Kim TH. The Remaining Ipsilateral Ureteral Orifice Provokes Intravesical Tumor Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter Study With a Mid-Term Follow-Up. Urology 2020; 145:166-171. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.06.083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 06/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
10
|
UroVysion ® predicts intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract: a prospective study. Int J Clin Oncol 2020; 26:178-185. [PMID: 32959230 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-020-01785-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/06/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract (UCUUT) is common. One of the mechanisms driving this is the implantation of cancer cells from the UCUUT at the RNUs. Therefore, their detection after RNU can assist in predicting IVR. This study aimed to examine the utility of UroVysion® as a tool for predicting bladder recurrence after RNU for UCUUT. METHODS We prospectively enrolled 65 patients who received RNU for high-grade UCUUT between October 2013 and April 2017. RESULTS Of the 65 patients, 54 (83.1%) who had both bladder urine samples available immediately after RNU (0 postoperative days: POD) and 5 days after RNU (5POD) were selected. We performed UroVysion® and cytology. Twenty-two patients showed IVR with 32 foci. UroVysion® results at 0POD (26 patients, 48.1%) and/or 5POD (31 patients, 57.4%) were positive in 42 (77.8%) patients. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UroVysion® for included cases were measured for both 0POD and 5POD samples; they were determined to be 95.5% (21/22), 34.4% (11/32), 50.0% (21/42), and 91.7% (11/12), respectively. For cytology, these values were 75.0% (15/20), 52.9% (18/34), 48.4% (15/31), and 78.3% (18/23), respectively. Forty-two (64.6%) patients who were UroVysion®-positive demonstrated IVR. The IVR rate between the group positive for either 0POD or 5POD and that negative for both significantly differed for both UroVysion® (p = 0.019) and cytology (p = 0.046). CONCLUSION Multiple urine tests using UroVysion® after RNU could be a useful predictor for IVR.
Collapse
|
11
|
Ko YH, Song PH, Park T, Choi JY. Retrograde pyelography before radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma is associated with intravesical tumor recurrence. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 46:778-785. [PMID: 32539252 PMCID: PMC7822386 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 01/26/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: To investigate the association between preoperative retrograde pyelography (RGP), conducted to evaluate upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), and intravesical recurrence (IVR) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Materials and Methods: Of 114 patients that underwent RNU, 72 patients without preoperative ureteroscopy and a history of bladder tumor were selectively enrolled. Variables associated with IVR were identified. Results: RGP was performed at a mean duration of 24.9 days prior to RNU in 41 (56.1%) of study subjects. During the mean follow-up period of 64.5 months, IVRs were identified in 32 (44.4%) patients at 22.3±18.8 (mean±SD) months after RNU. Despite similar tumor characteristics in the RGP and non-RGP groups, the incidence of IVR was considerably higher in the RGP group (63.4%) than in the non-RGP group (19.4%, p <0.001). The following variables differed significantly between the IVR and non-IVR groups: age (64.6±8.51 vs. 59.6±9.65 years), tumor location (lower or upper; 53.1% vs. 20%), tumor invasiveness (> pT2; 53.1% vs. 17.5%), preoperative hemoglobin (12.8±1.36 vs. 13.9±1.65), preoperative creatinine (1.29±0.32 vs. 1.11±0.22), and preoperative RGP (81.3% vs. 37.5%), respectively. Multivariate Cox regression model showed that tumor location (p=0.020, HR=2.742), preoperative creatinine level (p=0.004, HR=6.351), and preoperative RGP (p=0.045, HR=3.134) independently predicted IVR. Conclusion: Given the limitations of retrospective single-center series, performance of RGP before RNU was shown to have a negative effect on IVR after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Hwii Ko
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Phil Hyun Song
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | - Taeyong Park
- Department of Urology, Pusan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Young Choi
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Yeungnam University, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Huang Y, Cen J, Liu Z, Wei J, Chen Z, Feng Z, Lu J, Fang Y, Zhou F, Luo J, Mo C, Chen W. A Comparison of Different Prophylactic Intravesical Chemotherapy Regimens for Bladder Cancer Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: A Retrospective 2-center Study. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 18:1533033819844483. [PMID: 30987527 PMCID: PMC6469286 DOI: 10.1177/1533033819844483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy can decrease bladder cancer recurrence rate after
nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. We aimed to compare the effect of
different prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy regimens in bladder recurrence-free
survival. From 2000 to 2016, a total of 270 patients treated with radical
nephroureterectomy at both institutions were enrolled. Patients were divided into 3
groups: multiple-instillation group, single-instillation group, and no-instillation group.
Univariable and multivariable analyses with Cox regression methods were performed to
calculate hazard ratios for bladder recurrence using clinicopathologic data, including our
different instillation strategies. Sixty-three (23.3%) of 270 patients had subsequent
intravesical recurrence. Significantly fewer patients in both the instillation groups had
a recurrence compared to in the no-instillation group (13.1% vs 25.4% vs 41.5%,
P = .001). Furthermore, there was a significant difference between both
the instillation groups (P = .016). In different subsets of patients with
upper tract urothelial carcinoma, intravesical chemotherapy, either multiple or single
instillation, was a protective factor of bladder recurrence in pT2-4 (P =
.002) and high grade (P < .0001). Importantly, Kaplan-Meier curves of
bladder recurrence-free survival rate were increased observably in multiple-instillation
group compared to that in single-instillation group (P = .053 in pT2-4
subgroup; P = .048 in high-grade subgroup, respectively). On
multivariable analysis, intravesical chemotherapy (P < .001),
especially multiple instillations (hazard ratio 0.230; 95% confidence interval
0.110-0.479), was identified an independent predictor of bladder recurrence-free survival.
In conclusion, prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy effectively prevents bladder
recurrence after nephroureterectomy, especially with multiple instillations, in patients
with invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma or at high-grade status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Huang
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.,2 The Department of Emergency, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junjie Cen
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhuowei Liu
- 3 Department of Urology, Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jinhuan Wei
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenhua Chen
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zihao Feng
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jun Lu
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yong Fang
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- 3 Department of Urology, Cancer Centre, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Junhang Luo
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chengqiang Mo
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wei Chen
- 1 The Department of Urology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Taylor J, Meng X, Ghandour R, Margulis V. Advancements in the clinical management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2019; 19:1051-1060. [PMID: 31770492 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1698295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) remains a complex disease to manage given challenges in staging, surgical resection, use of perioperative therapy, and prevention of bladder recurrences. High-level evidence is limited to guide management; however, recent data have shifted treatment paradigms. We intend to review recent evidence on advancements in the clinical management for UTUC.Areas covered: This review summarizes advancements in pre-operative work-up, surgical technique, and the use of intravesical and systemic therapy in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. Special comment is made on progress in the genomics of UTUC and how that can inform clinical practice.Expert opinion: Advancements in the clinical management of UTUC are most prominently being made in the neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting. Although level I evidence is sparse, data from both single and multi-institutional retrospective studies strongly encourage the use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy especially in high-risk or advanced-stage patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob Taylor
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Xiaosong Meng
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Rashed Ghandour
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Yoo SH, Jeong CW, Kwak C, Kim HH, Choo MS, Ku JH. Intravesical Chemotherapy after Radical Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2019; 8:1059. [PMID: 31331003 PMCID: PMC6678753 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8071059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 07/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to determine the prophylactic effect of intravesical chemotherapy. Furthermore, it aimed to compare the efficacy of regimens on the prevention of bladder recurrence, after nephroureterectomy, for upper tract urothelial carcinoma by systematic review and network meta-analysis. A comprehensive literature search was conducted to search for studies published before 22 December 2016 using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus. All studies comparing nephroureterectomy alone with prophylactic intravesical chemotherapy after nephroureterectomy were included. The primary outcome was intravesical recurrence-free survival rate. In addition, we conducted indirect comparisons among regimens using network meta-analysis, as well as three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on multicenter setting, and one large retrospective study with a total of 532 patients were analyzed. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) of bladder recurrence was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.38-0.76) in intravesical instillation patients. On network meta-analysis, pirarubicin was ranked the most effective regimen, while maintenance therapy of mitomycin C (MMC) with Ara-C and induction therapy of MMC were ranked as the second and third most effective regimens, respectively. Our study demonstrates that intravesical chemotherapy can prevent bladder recurrence in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after nephroureterectomy. It also suggests that a single instillation of pirarubicin is the most efficacious intravesical regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Hyun Yoo
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea,
| | - Chang Wook Jeong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea,
| | - Cheol Kwak
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea,
| | - Hyeon Hoe Kim
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea,
| | - Min Soo Choo
- Department of Urology, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong 18450, Korea.
| | - Ja Hyeon Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul 03080, Korea,.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mistretta FA, Carrion DM, Nazzani S, Vásquez JL, Fiori C, De Cobelli O, Porpiglia F, Esperto F. Bladder recurrence of primary upper tract urinary carcinoma following nephroureterectomy, and risk of upper urinary tract recurrence after ureteral stent positioning in patients with primary bladder cancer. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:191-200. [PMID: 30654603 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03311-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Upper tract urinary carcinoma (UTUC) and bladder cancer (BCa) share similar biological, histological and pathological characteristics. These resemblances could explain the high rate of synchronous and metachronous tumors affecting both upper urinary tract and bladder. In patients affected by primary UTUC bladder recurrence is quite common and it represents one of the major concerns during the follow-up of patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Conversely, UTUC recurrence after primary non-muscular invasive BCa is a relatively rare event. Moreover, there is no clear evidence on whether the use of Double-J stenting as drainage in patients affected by BCa increases the risk of UTUC recurrence. The aim of the current study was to summarize the most recent evidence regarding the bladder recurrence after UTUC surgical treatment, and the UTUC recurrence after stent positioning in patients affected by primary BCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco A Mistretta
- Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy - .,European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium -
| | - Diego M Carrion
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Urology, La Paz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sebastiano Nazzani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Donato Policlinic, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Juan L Vásquez
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Urology, University Hospital of Zealand, Roskilde, Denmark.,Department of Urology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Esperto
- European Society of Residents in Urology (ESRU), Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Urology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospital, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mekayten M, Yutkin V, Duvdevani M, Pode D, Hidas G, Landau EH, Youssef F, Gofrit ON. High frequency of bladder cancer after nephroureterectomy: justification for adjuvant intravesical treatment? Res Rep Urol 2018; 10:33-38. [PMID: 29872646 PMCID: PMC5973432 DOI: 10.2147/rru.s164166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy (NU) is common. However, there is no acceptable policy of adjuvant intravesical treatment after NU. Objective To assess the rate of bladder recurrence following NU and to identify the high-risk subgroups that may become candidates for adjuvant intravesical therapy after NU. Patients and methods Ninety-one patients (mean age 66.4 years) underwent NU. High-grade (HG) tumors were found in 63 patients and low-grade (LG) tumors in 28. Median follow-up was 72 months. The risk of bladder recurrence was assessed by uni- and multivariate analyses of patient and tumor characteristics. Results Bladder recurrence developed in 38 patients (41.8%) after a median period of 11 months. Among these, 25 patients with HG upper tract urothelial carcinoma (39.7%) and 13 patients with LG upper tract urothelial carcinoma (46.4%) developed recurrence. HG bladder recurrence developed in 24 patients (63.2%) and LG recurrence developed in 14 patients (36.8%). Stages pTa, pT1, pT2, or higher bladder recurrence developed in 26 (68.4%), 7 (18.4%), and 4 patients (10.5%), respectively, and pure pTis developed in 1 patient. On uni- and multivariate analyses, the risk of bladder recurrence was independent of any clinicopathologic characteristics. Conclusion High rate and short time interval of bladder recurrence after NU were found, with no specific subgroup of patients with increased risk. These findings support prescribing adjuvant intravesical therapy to all patients after NU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matan Mekayten
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Vladimir Yutkin
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Mordechai Duvdevani
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Dov Pode
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Guy Hidas
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ezekiel H Landau
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Fadi Youssef
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Ofer N Gofrit
- Department of Urology, Hadassah Hebrew University Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Knoedler JJ, Raman JD. Intracavitary therapies for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2018; 11:487-493. [PMID: 29634361 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2018.1461560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION While radical nephroureterectomy remains the gold-standard for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), there is a growing push for organ-sparing therapy in low-risk disease. Herein we review the use of intracavitary topical therapy for treatment of UTUC. Areas covered: A PubMed search was performed for studies pertaining to upper tract urothelial carcinoma, with 236 articles reviewed, and distilled for content pertinent to intracavitary therapy for UTUC. Topics discussed include agents used for management of UTUC, most commonly BCG, as well as techniques for administration. Additionally, we review the evidence for curative treatment for Cis versus adjuvant therapy for Ta/T1 disease. Finally, we discuss emerging technologies to improve agent delivery and efficacy in the upper tract. Expert commentary: No significant advances have occurred in topical management of UTUC in the past 2 decades. However, advances in diagnostic techniques such as modern ureteroscopes, and improved diagnostic imaging at the time of ureteroscopy may help improve our patient selection. Additional advances in topical therapy focused on increasing the duration of contact between agent delivered and the upper tract urothelium offer hope that a new leap forward in topical therapy is on the horizon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John J Knoedler
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Urology , Penn State Hershey Surgical Specialties , Hershey , PA , USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- a Department of Surgery, Division of Urology , Penn State Hershey Surgical Specialties , Hershey , PA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Re: Impact of Diagnostic Ureteroscopy on Intravesical Recurrence in Patients Undergoing Radical Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Urol 2018; 199:889-890. [PMID: 29642354 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2018.01.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
19
|
Guo RQ, Hong P, Xiong GY, Zhang L, Fang D, Li XS, Zhang K, Zhou LQ. Impact of ureteroscopy before radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinomas on oncological outcomes: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2017; 121:184-193. [PMID: 29032580 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Run-Qi Guo
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Peng Hong
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Geng-Yan Xiong
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Dong Fang
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Xue-Song Li
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Kai Zhang
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| | - Li-Qun Zhou
- Department of Urology; Peking University First Hospital; Beijing China
- Institute of Urology; National Research Centre for Genitourinary Oncology; Beijing China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aragón Chamizo J, Herranz Amo F, Hernández Fernández C, González Enguita C. Prognostic factors for vesical relapse in patients with upper urothelium tumours treated with surgery. Actas Urol Esp 2017; 41:571-576. [PMID: 28258788 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2017.01.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2016] [Revised: 01/13/2017] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify the prognostic factors for vesical relapse in patients with tumours of the upper urothelium treated with surgery. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with tumours of the upper urothelium who underwent surgery between 1999 and 2011 at our centre (139 patients). We collected demographic, clinical, diagnostic and pathological variables, as well as the treatment, complications and progression. A descriptive analysis was performed using the chi-squared test for categorical variables and the ANOVA test for continuous variables. We also performed a univariate and multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazards model. Statistical significance was considered when P<.05. All calculations were performed with SPSS Statistics version 21. RESULTS During the follow-up, 26.6% of the patients (37 cases) showed vesical relapse. Some 19.6% of the patients with no history of bladder tumours showed a bladder tumour relapse compared with 48.6% of the patients with a history of bladder tumours (P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, only the presence of bladder tumours prior to or concomitant with the upper urinary tract tumour diagnosis was identified as an independent predictor of bladder tumour relapse (P=.007). CONCLUSION In our series, only the presence of a prior or synchronous bladder tumour behaved as an independent predictor of bladder tumour relapse in patients with tumours of the upper urothelium treated with surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Aragón Chamizo
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España; Hospital Universitario Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Madrid, España.
| | - F Herranz Amo
- Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Madrid, España
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lu DD, Boorjian SA, Raman JD. Intravesical chemotherapy use after radical nephroureterectomy: A national survey of urologic oncologists. Urol Oncol 2017; 35:113.e1-113.e7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2016.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2016] [Revised: 10/11/2016] [Accepted: 10/23/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
22
|
Yang X, Li P, Deng X, Dong H, Cheng Y, Zhang X, Yang C, Tang J, Yuan W, Xu X, Tao J, Li P, Yang H, Lu Q, Gu M, Wang Z. Perioperative treatments for resected upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a network meta-analysis. Oncotarget 2017; 8:3568-3580. [PMID: 27683040 PMCID: PMC5356904 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.12239] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2015] [Accepted: 09/20/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative treatments have been used to improve prognosis in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, optimal management remains unestablished. METHODS We searched the Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases for studies published before June 20, 2015. All included studies were categorised into three groups on the basis of the outcome reported (overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS)). Relative hazard ratios (HRs) for death were calculated using random-effects Bayesian network meta-analysis methods. We also ranked the three different treatments in terms of three outcomes. RESULTS A total of 31 trials with 8100 patients were included. Compared with the control, adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) could improve OS, DSS and RFS by 32% (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.89), 29% (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.54-0.89) and 51% (HR 0.49, 95% CI 0.23-0.85), respectively. We noted a marked prolongation of RFS in both intravesical chemotherapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.09-0.69) as well as concurrent radiotherapy and intravesical chemotherapy (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.03-0.97) than in the control. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) showed a significant improvement in DSS relative to the control (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.06-0.61) and a distinct advantage over AC (HR 0.36, 95% CI 0.08-0.90) or AR (HR 6.89, 95% CI 1.25-18.66). CONCLUSIONS Our results showed that AC; intravesical chemotherapy; and concurrent radiotherapy and intravesical chemotherapy could improve the prognosis of UTUC patients. NAC was found to be more favourable for UTUC than AC in terms of DSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Peng Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaheng Deng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Hongquan Dong
- Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yidong Cheng
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaolei Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Chengdi Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jingyuan Tang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Wenbo Yuan
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiaoting Xu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jun Tao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Pengchao Li
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Haiwei Yang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Qiang Lu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Min Gu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Zengjun Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Laguna MP. Re: Risk Stratification for Bladder Recurrence of Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma after Radical Nephroureterectomy. J Urol 2015; 194:1582-3. [PMID: 26582659 DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/01/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
24
|
Sung HH, Jeon HG, Han DH, Jeong BC, Seo SI, Lee HM, Choi HY, Jeon SS. Diagnostic Ureterorenoscopy Is Associated with Increased Intravesical Recurrence following Radical Nephroureterectomy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0139976. [PMID: 26556239 PMCID: PMC4640521 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2015] [Accepted: 09/18/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is powerful tool to confirm upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). However, URS and associated manipulation may be related to the risk of intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). We aimed to investigate whether preoperative ureterorenoscopy would increase IVR after RNU in patients with UTUC. We performed a retrospective analysis of 630 patients who had RNU with bladder cuff excision due to UTUC. Diagnostic URS was performed in 282 patients (44.7%). Patients were divided into two groups according to the URS. Survival analysis and multivariate Cox regression model were performed to address risk factors for the IVR. The interval from URS to RNU was measured. During URS, manipulation such as biopsy and resection was determined. The median age was 64 (IQR 56–72) years with follow-up duration of 34.3 (15.7–64.9) months. Median time from URS to RNU was 16 (0–38) days. The IVR developed in 42.5% (n = 268) patients at 8.2 (4.9–14.7) months. The five-year IVR-free survival rate was 42.6 ± 8.0% and 63.6 ± 6.9% in patients with and without preoperative URS, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, previous history of bladder tumour, extravesical excision of distal ureter, multifocal tumour, and URS (HR, 95% CI; 1.558, 1.204–2.016, P = 0.001) were independent predictors for higher IVR. The IVR rate in patients without manipulation during URS was not different to those with manipulation (P = 0.658). The duration from URS to RNU was not associated with IVR (P = 0.799). Diagnostic URS for UTUC increased IVR rate after RNU. However, the lessening of interval from URS to radical surgery or URS without any manipulation could not reduce the IVR rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyun Hwan Sung
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hwang Gyun Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Deok Hyun Han
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byong Chang Jeong
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Il Seo
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Moo Lee
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Han-Yong Choi
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seong Soo Jeon
- Department of Urology, Samsung Medical Center, Samsung Biomedical Research Institute, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Yuan H, Mao X, Bai Y, Li H, Liu L, Pu C, Li J, Tang Y, Wei Q, Han P. The effect of intravesical chemotherapy in the prevention of intravesical recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a meta-analysis. J Chemother 2015; 27:195-200. [DOI: 10.1179/1973947815y.0000000034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
26
|
Audenet F, Rouprêt M, Houédé N, Colin P. Traitements non chirurgicaux des tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure : état-de-l’art pour le rapport annuel de l’Association française d’urologie. Prog Urol 2014; 24:1030-40. [DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2014.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2014] [Revised: 06/27/2014] [Accepted: 07/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
27
|
Zargar H, Krishnan J, Autorino R, Akca O, Brandao LF, Laydner H, Samarasekera D, Ko O, Haber GP, Kaouk JH, Stein RJ. Robotic Nephroureterectomy: A Simplified Approach Requiring No Patient Repositioning or Robot Redocking. Eur Urol 2014; 66:769-77. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2014] [Accepted: 02/28/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
28
|
Fradet V, Mauermann J, Kassouf W, Rendon R, Jacobsen N, Fairey A, Izawa J, Kapoor A, Black P, Tanguay S, Chin J, So A, Lattouf JB, Bell D, Saad F, Sheyegan B, Drachenberg D, Cagiannos I, Lacombe L. Risk factors for bladder cancer recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial tumors: Results from the Canadian Upper Tract Collaboration1Co-first authors. Urol Oncol 2014; 32:839-45. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2014] [Revised: 04/07/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
29
|
Cho YH, Seo YH, Chung SJ, Hwang I, Yu HS, Kim SO, Jung SI, Kang TW, Kwon DD, Park K, Hwang JE, Heo SH, Kim GS, Hwang EC. Predictors of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: an inflammation-based prognostic score. Korean J Urol 2014; 55:453-9. [PMID: 25045443 PMCID: PMC4101114 DOI: 10.4111/kju.2014.55.7.453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2014] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Systemic inflammatory responses, which are defined in terms of the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS), have been reported to be independent predictors of unfavorable outcomes in various human cancers. We assessed the utility of the GPS as a predictor of intravesical recurrence after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC). MATERIALS AND METHODS We collected data for 147 UTUC patients with no previous history of bladder cancer who underwent RNU from 2004 to 2012. Associations between perioperative clinicopathological variables and intravesical recurrence were analyzed by using univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS Overall, 71 of 147 patients (48%) developed intravesical recurrence, including 21 patients (30%) diagnosed with synchronous bladder tumor. In the univariate analysis, performance status, diabetes mellitus (DM), serum albumin, C-reactive protein, GPS, and synchronous bladder tumor were associated with intravesical recurrence. In the multivariate analysis, performance status (hazard ratio [HR], 2.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.41-3.85; p=0.001), DM (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.21-3.41; p=0.007), cortical thinning (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.08-3.71; p=0.026), and GPS (score of 1: HR, 6.86; 95% CI, 3.69-12.7; p=0.001; score of 2: HR, 5.96; 95% CI, 3.10-11.4; p=0.001) were independent predictors of intravesical recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that the GPS as well as performance status, DM, and cortical thinning are associated with intravesical recurrence after RNU. Thus, more careful follow-up, coupled with postoperative intravesical therapy to avoid bladder recurrence, should be considered in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Hyun Cho
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Young Ho Seo
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung Jun Chung
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Insang Hwang
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Ho Song Yu
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Sun-Ouck Kim
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung Il Jung
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Taek Won Kang
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Dong Deuk Kwon
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Kwangsung Park
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Jun Eul Hwang
- Department of Hematology-Oncology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Suk Hee Heo
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Geun Soo Kim
- Department of Urology, Gwangju Hospital, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Eu Chang Hwang
- Department of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Chen SK, Chung CA, Cheng YC, Huang CJ, Chen WY, Ruaan RC, Li C, Tsao CW, Hu WW, Chien CC. Toll-like receptor 6 and connective tissue growth factor are significantly upregulated in mitomycin-C-treated urothelial carcinoma cells under hydrostatic pressure stimulation. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2014; 18:410-6. [PMID: 24689870 DOI: 10.1089/gtmb.2013.0443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is the most common histologic subtype of bladder cancer. The administration of mitomycin C (MMC) into the bladder after transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT) is a common treatment strategy for preventing recurrence after surgery. We previously applied hydrostatic pressure combined with MMC in UC cells and found that hydrostatic pressure synergistically enhanced MMC-induced UC cell apoptosis through the Fas/FasL pathways. To understand the alteration of gene expressions in UC cells caused by hydrostatic pressure and MMC, oligonucleotide microarray was used to explore all the differentially expressed genes. RESULTS After bioinformatics analysis and gene annotation, Toll-like receptor 6 (TLR6) and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF) showed significant upregulation among altered genes, and their gene and protein expressions with each treatment of UC cells were validated by quantitative real-time PCR and immunoblotting. CONCLUSION Under treatment with MMC and hydrostatic pressure, UC cells showed increasing apoptosis using extrinsic pathways through upregulation of TLR6 and CTGF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shao-Kuan Chen
- 1 Department of Urology, Sijhih Cathay General Hospital , New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Luo HL, Kang CH, Chen YT, Chuang YC, Cheng YT, Lee WC, Chiang PH. Oncological impact of endoscopic bladder cuff management during nephroureterectomy varies according to upper urinary tract tumor location. Int J Urol 2013; 21:366-9. [PMID: 24118071 DOI: 10.1111/iju.12285] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2013] [Accepted: 08/19/2013] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To compare the oncological outcome between extravesical excision and transurethral excision for bladder cuff management in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy with upper urinary tract urothelial cancer. METHODS From January 2005 to December 2010, 396 patients were enrolled in the present retrospective study. Nephroureterectomy was carried out either by endoscopic or extravesical bladder cuff excision. The oncological outcome between these two procedures was analyzed in patients with different tumor locations. RESULTS The average age of the patients was 66.41 ± 10.52 years, and the median follow-up duration was 40.65 ± 23.84 months. For upper urinary tract urothelial cancer management, extravesical bladder cuff excision was carried out in 240 patients, whereas the endoscopic method was carried out in 156 patients. Previous bladder cancer is still the most independent predictor for bladder recurrence (P < 0.001). In addition, endoscopic bladder cuff management for low ureteral tumor was also independently associated with more bladder tumor recurrence (P = 0.017). Non-organ confined pathological stage still independently predicted metastasis (P < 0.001) and cancer-specific death (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There are similar oncological outcomes after nephroureterectomy combined with extravesical or endoscopic bladder cuff management for patients with upper urinary tract urothelial cancer above the low ureter. However, there is a higher incidence of bladder tumor recurrence for the low ureteral tumor after nephroureterectomy with endoscopic bladder cuff excision.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Lun Luo
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Takahara K, Inamoto T, Komura K, Watsuji T, Azuma H. Post-operative urothelial recurrence in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma managed by radical nephroureterectomy with an ipsilateral bladder cuff: Minimal prognostic impact in comparison with non-urothelial recurrence and other clinical indicators. Oncol Lett 2013; 6:1015-1020. [PMID: 24137456 PMCID: PMC3796430 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2012] [Accepted: 06/20/2013] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a rare disease, and novel prognostic factors for patients who have undergone a radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for UTUC have been studied intensely. To the best of our knowledge, the prognostic value of urothelial recurrence in patients with UTUC has not been previously described in studies. The present study compared the prognostic value of urothelial and non-urothelial recurrence in patients with UTUC of the kidney and ureter managed by surgery. The inclusion criteria consisted of a diagnosis of non-metastatic UTUC (any T stage, N0–1 and M0) and receipt of an RNU with an ipsilateral bladder cuff as the primary treatment. Of the 153 patients that were screened for the study, comprehensive clinical and pathological data was available for 103 patients, who were consequently included in the analysis. Overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) times were estimated. A multivariate analysis was performed using the Cox regression model. The median follow-up period was 29 months (interquartile range, 14–63 months). The patient population was comprised of 71 males (68.9%) and 32 females (31.1%). A total of 32 patients (31.1%) showed non-urothelial recurrence, while 38 patients (36.9%) exhibited urothelial recurrence and 33 patients (32.0%) exhibited no recurrence. When comparing the risk parameters between the non-urothelial recurrence categories, the factors of pathological grade, microvascular invasion, lymphatic invasion and pT classification showed significant differences. However, there were no significant differences between the urothelial recurrence categories. No significant difference was observed between the OS and CSS times within the urothelial recurrence categories (P=0.3955 and P=0.05891, respectively), but significant differences were identified in the non-urothelial recurrence categories (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). Among the other relevant descriptive pre-operative characteristics in the multivariate analysis, only non-urothelial recurrence remained associated with a worse CSS [P=0.002; hazard ratio (HR) 9.512]. The results show that urothelial recurrence has a minimal prognostic value in patients with UTUC managed by RNU with an ipsilateral bladder cuff.
Collapse
|
33
|
Ito H, Oyama N, Tsuchiyama K, Yokoyama O. Tumour multiplicity as a risk factor for the development of bladder tumours after primary upper urinary tract cancer. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL UROLOGY 2013. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bjmsu.2012.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To determine the independent risk factors for intravesical tumour recurrence in patients with primary urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract. Patients and methods: Of the 60 patients who underwent nephroureterectomy for urothelial cancer of the upper urinary tract, the data from 49 patients were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with a previous history or concomitance of bladder cancer were excluded from the study. Multivariate analysis by Cox’s proportional hazards model was used to determine independent risk factors for intravesical tumour recurrence. Results: Of the 49 patients reviewed, 22 (44.9%) experienced subsequent intravesical tumour recurrence during a mean follow-up period of 26 months (range 3–103). On multivariate analysis, tumour multiplicity had a statistically significant impact on the risk of intravesical tumour recurrence ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: Neither the pathology of the upper urinary tract cancers nor the method of treatment was associated with recurrent bladder cancers. Only tumour multiplicity had a significant impact on the incidence of intravesical tumour recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Ito
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Oyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Katsuki Tsuchiyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| | - Osamu Yokoyama
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medical Science, University of Fukui, Fukui, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ito A, Shintaku I, Satoh M, Ioritani N, Aizawa M, Tochigi T, Kawamura S, Aoki H, Numata I, Takeda A, Namiki S, Namima T, Ikeda Y, Kambe K, Kyan A, Ueno S, Orikasa K, Katoh S, Adachi H, Tokuyama S, Ishidoya S, Yamaguchi T, Arai Y. Prospective Randomized Phase II Trial of a Single Early Intravesical Instillation of Pirarubicin (THP) in the Prevention of Bladder Recurrence After Nephroureterectomy for Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: The THP Monotherapy Study Group Trial. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31:1422-7. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2012.45.2128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 151] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose We evaluated the efficacy of a single early intravesical instillation of pirarubicin (THP) in the prevention of bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUT-UC). Patients and Methods From December 2005 to November 2008, 77 patients clinically diagnosed with UUT-UC from 11 institutions participating in the Tohoku Urological Evidence-Based Medicine Study Group were preoperatively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to receive or not receive a single instillation of THP (30 mg in 30 mL of saline) into the bladder within 48 hours after nephroureterectomy. Cystoscopy and urinary cytology were repeated every 3 months for 2 years or until the occurrence of first bladder recurrence. Results Seventy-two patients were evaluable for efficacy analysis, 21 of whom had a subsequent bladder recurrence. Significantly fewer patients who received THP had a recurrence compared with the control group (16.9% at 1 year and 16.9% at 2 years in the THP group v 31.8% at 1 year and 42.2% at 2 years in the control group; log-rank P = .025). No remarkable adverse events were observed in the THP-treated group. Based on multivariate analysis, THP instillation (hazard rate [HR], 0.26; 95% CI, 0.07 to 0.91; P = .035) and open surgery (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.09 to 0.84; P = .024) were independently predictive of a reduced incidence of bladder recurrence. Conclusion In this prospective randomized phase II study, a single intravesical instillation of THP seemed to reduce bladder recurrence after nephroureterectomy. A phase III, large-scale, multicenter study is needed to confirm these observations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akihiro Ito
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Ichiro Shintaku
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Makoto Satoh
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Naomasa Ioritani
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Masataka Aizawa
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Tatsuo Tochigi
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Sadafumi Kawamura
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Hiroshi Aoki
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Isao Numata
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Atsushi Takeda
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Shunichi Namiki
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Takashige Namima
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Yoshihiro Ikeda
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Koichi Kambe
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Atsushi Kyan
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Seiji Ueno
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Kazuhiko Orikasa
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Shinnosuke Katoh
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Hisanobu Adachi
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Satoru Tokuyama
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Shigeto Ishidoya
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Takuhiro Yamaguchi
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| | - Yoichi Arai
- Akihiro Ito, Ichiro Shintaku, Kazuhiko Orikasa, Shigeto Ishidoya, Takuhiro Yamaguchi, and Yoichi Arai, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Naomasa Ioritani and Masataka Aizawa, Sendai Shakai Hoken Hospital; Takashige Namima and Yoshihiro Ikeda, Tohoku Rosai Hospital, Sendai; Makoto Satoh, Sen-en General Hospital, Tagajo; Tatsuo Tochigi, Sadafumi Kawamura, and Hiroshi Aoki, Miyagi Cancer Center, Natori; Isao Numata, Atsushi Takeda, and Shunichi Namiki, Osaki Citizen Hospital, Osaki; Koichi
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Fang D, Li XS, Xiong GY, Yao L, He ZS, Zhou LQ. Prophylactic Intravesical Chemotherapy to Prevent Bladder Tumors after Nephroureterectomy for Primary Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Urol Int 2013; 91:291-6. [DOI: 10.1159/000350508] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2012] [Accepted: 02/21/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
36
|
Remzi M, Shariat S, Huebner W, Fajkovic H, Seitz C. Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: what have we learned in the last 4 years? Ther Adv Urol 2011; 3:69-80. [PMID: 21869907 DOI: 10.1177/1756287211403349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last 4 years many studies have been published on the topic of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This is a recent review of the available literature of the last 3 years. A systematic Medline/PubMed search on UTUC including limits for clinical trials and randomized, controlled trials was performed for English-language articles using the keywords 'upper urinary tract carcinoma', 'nephroureterectomy', 'laparoscopic', 'ureteroscopy', 'percutaneous', 'renal pelvis', 'ureter' and their combinations from January 2008 to December 2010. Additional selected reports from 2007 were included. Case reports and non-English literature were excluded. Publications were mostly retrospective, including some large, multicentre studies from the Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Collaboration (UTUCC). The authors of this article are members of the UTUCC. Altogether, 92 original articles dealing with UTUC were identified and summarized. The vast majority of the available literature has a low level of evidence (level IV), although many multicentre studies tried to overcome the problem of low numbers by pooling data. It was concluded that in the last 3 years our knowledge regarding UTUC has increased dramatically, although new study concepts allowing us to increase the level of evidence are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mesut Remzi
- Landeskrankenhaus Weinviertel-Korneuburg, Wiener-Ring 3-5, 2100 Korneuburg, Austria
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Postoperative Intravesical Therapy to Prevent Bladder Tumor Recurrence: Are We Ready to Listen Yet? Eur Urol 2011; 60:711-2. [DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2011] [Accepted: 06/13/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
38
|
Preoperative positive urine cytology is a risk factor for subsequent development of bladder cancer after nephroureterectomy in patients with upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2011; 30:271-5. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-011-0731-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2011] [Accepted: 07/12/2011] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
|
39
|
O'Brien T, Ray E, Singh R, Coker B, Beard R. Prevention of bladder tumours after nephroureterectomy for primary upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma: a prospective, multicentre, randomised clinical trial of a single postoperative intravesical dose of mitomycin C (the ODMIT-C Trial). Eur Urol 2011; 60:703-10. [PMID: 21684068 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.05.064] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2011] [Accepted: 05/31/2011] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Standard treatment for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UUTUC) is nephroureterectomy. Subsequently, around 40% of patients will develop a bladder tumour potentially because of implantation from the primary tumour. OBJECTIVE To prevent bladder tumour after nephroureterectomy with a single postoperative dose of intravesical mitomycin C (MMC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A prospective, randomised, nonblinded trial (ODMIT-C: One Dose Mitomycin C) was undertaken in 46 British centres between July 2000 and December 2006. The study recruited 284 patients with no previous or concurrent history of bladder cancer undergoing nephroureterectomy for suspected UUTUC. INTERVENTION A single postoperative intravesical dose of MMC (40 mg in 40 ml saline) or standard management on removal of the urinary catheter. MEASUREMENTS Bladder tumour formation was judged by visual appearance at cystoscopy at 3, 6, and 12 mo following nephroureterectomy. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS One hundred forty-four patients were randomised to receive MMC and 140 patients to receive standard care. In the MMC arm, 105 of 144 patients (73%) and 115 of 140 patients (82%) in the standard care arm received their allocated treatment. Thirteen of 105 patients who received MMC and 20 of 115 patients allocated to standard treatment did not complete follow-up. By modified intention-to-treat analysis, 21 of 120 patients (17%) in the MMC arm developed a bladder recurrence in the first year compared to 32 of 119 patients (27%) in the standard treatment arm (p=0.055). By treatment as per protocol analysis, 17 of 105 patients (16%) in the MMC arm and 31 of 115 patients (27%) in the standard treatment arm developed a recurrence (p=0.03). No serious adverse events were reported. A limitation is that histologic proof of recurrence was not required in this trial. CONCLUSIONS A single postoperative dose of intravesical MMC appears to reduce the risk of a bladder tumour within the first year following nephroureterectomy for UUTUC. The absolute reduction in risk is 11%, the relative reduction in risk is 40%, and the number needed to treat to prevent one bladder tumour is nine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim O'Brien
- Urology Centre, Guys Hospital, Guys and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Davis JL, Pandalai P, Ripley RT, Langan RC, Steinberg SM, Walker M, Toomey MA, Levy E, Avital I. Regional chemotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: RECLAP trial. Trials 2011; 12:129. [PMID: 21595953 PMCID: PMC3118359 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-12-129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2011] [Accepted: 05/19/2011] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Surgery offers the only chance for cure. However, less than twenty percent of patients are considered operative candidates at the time of diagnosis. A common reason for being classified as unresectable is advanced loco-regional disease.A review of the literature indicates that almost nine hundred patients with pancreatic cancer have received regional chemotherapy in the last 15 years. Phase I studies have shown regional administration of chemotherapy to be safe. The average reported response rate was approximately 26%. The average 1-year survival was 39%, with an average median survival of 9 months. Of the patients that experienced a radiographic response to therapy, 78 (78/277, 28%) patients underwent exploratory surgery following regional chemotherapy administration; thirty-two (41%) of those patients were amenable to pancreatectomy. None of the studies performed analyses to identify factors predicting response to regional chemotherapy.Progressive surgical techniques combined with current neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy strategies have already yielded emerging support for a multimodality approach to treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer.Intravenous gemcitabine is the current standard treatment of pancreatic cancer. However, >90% of the drug is secreted unchanged affecting toxicity but not the cancer per se. Gemcitabine is converted inside the cell into its active drug form in a rate limiting reaction. We hypothesize that neoadjuvant regional chemotherapy with continuous infusion of gemcitabine will be well tolerated and may improve resectability rates in cases of locally advanced pancreatic cancer. DESIGN This is a phase I study designed to evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of super-selective intra-arterial administration of gemcitabine in patients with locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Patients considered unresectable due to locally advanced pancreatic cancer will receive super-selective arterial infusion of gemcitabine over 24 hours via subcutaneous indwelling port. Three to six patients will be enrolled per dose cohort, with seven cohorts, plus an additional six patients at the maximum tolerated dose; accrual is expected to last 36 months. Secondary objectives will include the determination of progression free and overall survival, as well as the conversion rate from unresectable to potentially resectable pancreatic cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01294358.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeremy L Davis
- Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|