1
|
Amit U, Shagun M, Plastaras JP, Metz JM, Karasic TB, Lubas MJ, Ben-Josef E. Clinical outcomes and risk stratification in unresectable biliary tract cancers undergoing radiation therapy. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:102. [PMID: 39090660 PMCID: PMC11293151 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02481-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are rare and aggressive malignancies originating from intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts and the gallbladder. Surgery is the only curative option, but due to late-stage diagnosis, is frequently not feasible, leaving chemotherapy as the primary treatment. Radiotherapy (RT) can be an effective alternative for patients with unresectable, non-metastatic BTC despite the generally poor prognosis and significant variability. To help manage patients with unresectable BTC who receive RT, we aimed to identify prognostic markers that could aid in predicting overall survival (OS). METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania, involving seventy-eight patients with unresectable BTC treated with definitive intent RT. Comprehensive demographic, clinical, and treatment-related data were extracted from the electronic medical records. Univariate and multivariate Cox regressions were employed to identify predictors of OS after RT. A biomarker model was developed for refined survival prediction. RESULTS The cohort primarily comprised patients with good performance status without significant hepatic dysfunction at presentation. The predominant treatment approach involved hypofractionated RT or concurrent 5FU-based chemoRT. Median OS after RT was 12.3 months, and 20 patients (15.6%) experienced local progression with a median time of 30.1 months. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified CA19-9 (above median) and higher albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) grades at presentation as significant predictors of poor OS. Median OS after RT was 24 months for patients with no risk factors and 6.3 months for those with both. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates generally poor but significantly heterogeneous OS in patients with unresectable BTC treated with RT. We have developed a biomarker model based on CA19-9 and ALBI grade at presentation that can distinguish sub-populations with markedly diverse prognoses. This model can aid the clinical management of this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uri Amit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Misra Shagun
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Postgraduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - James M Metz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Thomas B Karasic
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Maryanne J Lubas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Verma S, Grindrod N, Breadner D, Lock M. The Current Role of Radiation in the Management of Cholangiocarcinoma-A Narrative Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1776. [PMID: 38730728 PMCID: PMC11083065 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16091776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2024] [Revised: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is a rare cancer of bile ducts. It is associated with a poor prognosis. The incidence of CCA is rising worldwide. Anatomical subgroups have been used to classify patients for treatment and prognosis. There is a growing understanding of clinically important distinctions based on underlying genetic differences that lead to different treatment options and outcomes. Its management is further complicated by a heterogeneous population and relative rarity, which limits the conduct of large trials to guide management. Surgery has been the primary method of therapy for localized disease; however, recurrence and death remain high with or without surgery. Therefore, there have been concerted efforts to investigate new treatment options, such as the use of neoadjuvant treatments to optimize surgical outcomes, targeted therapy, leveraging a new understanding of immunobiology and stereotactic radiation. In this narrative review, we address the evidence to improve suboptimal outcomes in unresectable CCA with radiation, as well as the role of radiation in neoadjuvant and postoperative treatment. We also briefly discuss the recent developments in systemic treatment with targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saurav Verma
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Natalie Grindrod
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Daniel Breadner
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| | - Michael Lock
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada; (S.V.); (N.G.); (D.B.)
- London Regional Cancer Program, London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON N6A 5W9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ohaegbulam KC, Koethe Y, Fung A, Mayo SC, Grossberg AJ, Chen EY, Sharzehi K, Kardosh A, Farsad K, Rocha FG, Thomas CR, Nabavizadeh N. The multidisciplinary management of cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer 2023; 129:184-214. [PMID: 36382577 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a lethal malignancy of the biliary epithelium that can arise anywhere along the biliary tract. Surgical resection confers the greatest likelihood of long-term survivability. However, its insidious onset, difficult diagnostics, and resultant advanced presentation render the majority of patients unresectable, highlighting the importance of early detection with novel biomarkers. Developing liver-directed therapies and emerging targeted therapeutics may offer improved survivability for patients with unresectable or advanced disease. In this article, the authors review the current multidisciplinary standards of care in resectable and unresectable cholangiocarcinoma, with an emphasis on novel biomarkers for early detection and nonsurgical locoregional therapy options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kim C Ohaegbulam
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Yilun Koethe
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Alice Fung
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Aaron J Grossberg
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Emerson Y Chen
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Kaveh Sharzehi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Adel Kardosh
- Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Khashayar Farsad
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Flavio G Rocha
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Dartmouth School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Nima Nabavizadeh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Laughlin BS, Petersen MM, Yu NY, Anderson JD, Rule WG, Borad MJ, Aqel BA, Sonbol MB, Mathur AK, Moss AA, Bekaii-Saab TS, Ahn DH, DeWees TA, Sio TT, Ashman JB. Clinical outcomes for hilar and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with adjuvant, definitive, or liver transplant-based neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy strategies: a single-center experience. J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 13:288-297. [PMID: 35284111 PMCID: PMC8899753 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-21-615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We report our experience with 3 strategies for treating hilar and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) including chemoradiotherapy: neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) and orthotopic liver transplant, surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (aCRT), and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). METHODS We included patients treated from 1998 through 2019. Kaplan-Meier estimates, log-rank testing, and univariate/multivariate Cox models were used to assess outcomes (local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival). RESULTS Sixty-five patients (nCRT, n=20; aCRT, n=16; dCRT, n=29) met inclusion criteria [median (range) age 65 years (27-84 years)]. Median posttreatment follow-up was 19.1 months (0.8-164.8 months) for all patients and 38.6, 24.3, and 9.0 months for the nCRT, aCRT, and dCRT groups, respectively. At 3 and 5 years, overall survival was 78% and 59% for the nCRT group; 47% and 35%, aCRT group; and 11% and 0%, dCRT group. Compared with the dCRT group, the nCRT group (hazard ratio =0.13, 95% CI: 0.05-0.33) and the aCRT group (hazard ratio =0.29, 95% CI: 0.14-0.64) had significantly improved overall survival (P<0.001). The 5-year local progression-free survival (50% nCRT vs. 30% aCRT vs. 0% dCRT, P<0.001) and 5-year disease-free survival (61% nCRT vs. 30% aCRT vs. 0% dCRT, P=0.01) were significantly better for strategies combined with surgery. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes for patients with extrahepatic CCA were superior for those who underwent nCRT/orthotopic liver transplant or postsurgical aCRT than for patients treated with dCRT. The excellent outcomes after nCRT/orthotopic liver transplant provide additional independent data supporting the validity of this strategy. The poor survival of patients treated with dCRT highlights a need for better therapies when surgery is not possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brady S. Laughlin
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Molly M. Petersen
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - Nathan Y. Yu
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Justin D. Anderson
- Mayo Clinic School of Graduate Medical Education, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - William G. Rule
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mitesh J. Borad
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Bashar A. Aqel
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Mohamad B. Sonbol
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Amit K. Mathur
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Adyr A. Moss
- Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Division of Transplant and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Tanios S. Bekaii-Saab
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Daniel H. Ahn
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
- Mayo Clinic Cancer Center, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Terence T. Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Jonathan B. Ashman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sinha S, Engineer R, Ostwal V, Ramaswamy A, Chopra S, Shetty N. Radiotherapy for locally advanced unresectable gallbladder cancer - A way forward: Comparative study of chemotherapy versus chemoradiotherapy. J Cancer Res Ther 2022; 18:147-151. [PMID: 35381776 DOI: 10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_1568_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For nonmetastatic locally advanced gallbladder cancer (LAGBC) which remains unresectable and nonmetastatic after chemotherapy, there is no consensus on whether to continue chemotherapy or add local radiotherapy (RT) for improving outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-five patients of surgically unresectable nonmetastatic LAGBC were analyzed. Twenty patients did not receive RT (no RT cohort) and received only chemotherapy, while 25 patients received RT (RT cohort) with conformal techniques along with concurrent gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. No RT and RT cohorts were compared for disease-related outcomes and toxicities. RESULTS Median follow-up of the entire cohort was 11.5 months. Two-year progression-free survival (18.6% vs. 0%, P = 0.0001) and overall survival (37.3% vs. 5%, P = 0.0001) were significantly better in the RT cohort as compared to a no RT cohort. More number of patients had locoregional progression in the no RT cohort (85% vs. 32%, P = 0.0002). Radiation-induced acute and late gastrointestinal toxicity ≥ RTOG Grade 3 were seen in one and two patients, respectively. CONCLUSION Addition of local RT to chemotherapy improves the survival outcomes and can be considered as a definite treatment modality for nonmetastatic LAGBC patients not amenable to surgery who have responded to chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shwetabh Sinha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Vikas Ostwal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Anant Ramaswamy
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Goel S, Aggarwal A, Iqbal A, Talwar V, Mitra S, Singh S. Multimodality management of gallbladder cancer can lead to a better outcome: Experience from a tertiary care oncology centre in North India. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:7813-7830. [PMID: 34963744 PMCID: PMC8661382 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i45.7813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical resection is a treatment of choice for gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients but only 10% of patients have a resectable disease at presentation. Even after surgical resection, overall survival (OS) has been poor due to high rates of recurrence. Combination of surgery and systemic therapy can improve outcomes in this aggressive disease.
AIM To summarize our single-center experience with multimodality management of resectable GBC patients.
METHODS Data of all patients undergoing surgery for suspected GBC from January 2012 to December 2018 was retrieved from a prospectively maintained electronic database. Information extracted included demographics, operative and perioperative details, histopathology, neoadjuvant/adjuvant therapy, follow-up, and recurrence. To know the factors associated with recurrence and OS, univariate and multivariate analysis was done using log rank test and cox proportional hazard analysis for categorical and continuous variables, respectively. Multivariate analysis was done using multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS Of 274 patients with GBC taken up for surgical resection, 172 (62.7%) were female and the median age was 56 years. On exploration, 102 patients were found to have a metastatic or unresectable disease (distant metastasis in 66 and locally unresectable in 34). Of 172 patients who finally underwent surgery, 93 (54%) underwent wedge resection followed by anatomical segment IVb/V resection in 66 (38.4%) and modified extended right hepatectomy in 12 (7%) patients. The postoperative mortality at 90 d was 4.6%. During a median follow-up period of 20 mo, 71 (41.2%) patients developed recurrence. Estimated 1-, 3-, and 5-years OS rates were 86.5%, 56%, and 43.5%, respectively. Estimated 1- and 3-year disease free survival (DFS) rates were 75% and 49.2%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, inferior OS was seen with pT3/T4 tumor (P = 0.0001), perineural invasion (P = 0.0096), and R+ resection (P = 0.0125). However, only pT3/T4 tumors were associated with a poor DFS (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSION Multimodality treatment significantly improves the 5-year survival rate of patients with GBC up to 43%. R+ resection, higher T stage, and perineural invasion adversely affect the outcome and should be considered for systemic therapy in addition to surgery to optimize the outcomes. Multimodality treatment of GBC has potential to improve the survival of GBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shaifali Goel
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, Delhi 110085, Delhi, India
| | - Abhishek Aggarwal
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, Delhi 110085, Delhi, India
| | - Assif Iqbal
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, Delhi 110085, Delhi, India
| | - Vineet Talwar
- Department of Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, Delhi 110085, Delhi, India
| | - Swarupa Mitra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, Delhi 110085, Delhi, India
| | - Shivendra Singh
- Department of GI and HPB Oncosurgery, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Center, Delhi 110085, Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Jethwa KR, Sannapaneni S, Mullikin TC, Harmsen WS, Petersen MM, Antharam P, Laughlin B, Mahipal A, Halfdanarson TR, Merrell KW, Neben-Wittich M, Sio TT, Haddock MG, Hallemeier CL. Chemoradiotherapy for patients with locally advanced or unresectable extra-hepatic biliary cancer. J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 11:1408-1420. [PMID: 33457010 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-20-245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although surgical resection is the preferred curative-intent treatment option for patients with non-metastatic, extra-hepatic biliary cancer (EBC), radiotherapy (RT) or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) may be utilized in select cases when surgical resection is not feasible. The purpose of this study is to report the efficacy and adverse events (AEs) associated with CRT for patients with locally advanced and unresectable EBC. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with EBC, including extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma or gallbladder cancer, deemed inoperable who received RT between 1998 and 2018. The median RT dose was 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and 94% received concurrent 5-fluorouracil. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) from the start of RT. The cumulative incidence of local progression (LP), locoregional progression (LRP), and distant metastasis (DM) were reported with death as a competing risk. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess for correlation between patient and treatment characteristics and outcomes. Results Forty-eight patients were included for analysis. The median OS was 12.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.3-73.2 months]. The 2-, 3-, and 5-year OS were 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), 20% (95% CI: 11-36%), and 7% (95% CI: 2-20%), respectively. The 2-year PFS, LP, LRP, and DM were 21% (95% CI: 12-36%), 27% (95% CI: 17-44%), 31% (95% CI: 20-48%), and 33% (95% CI: 22-50%), respectively. On univariate analysis, biologically effective dose (BED) >59.5 Gy10 was associated with improved OS [hazard ratio (HR): 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18-0.92, P=0.03] and PFS (HR: 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16-0.84, P=0.02) and primary tumor size (per 1 cm increase) was associated with worsened PFS (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.02-1.63, P=0.04). BED >59.5 Gy10 remained associated with PFS on multivariate analysis (HR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.15-0.78, P=0.01). Treatment-related grade 3+ acute and late gastrointestinal AEs occurred in 13% and 17% of patients, respectively. Conclusions RT is associated with 3- and 5-year survival in a subset of patients with unresectable EBC. Further exploration of the role of RT as part of a multi-modality curative treatment strategy is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Shilpa Sannapaneni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Trey C Mullikin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - William S Harmsen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Molly M Petersen
- Department of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Brady Laughlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Amit Mahipal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | | | | | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Moreau J, Lapeyre M, Benoit C, Pezet D, Biau J. [Intra and extra hepatic cholangiocarcinomas radiation therapy]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:175-181. [PMID: 33423966 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Revised: 06/09/2020] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinomas are digestive tumors whose incidence remains low and have poor prognosis. The benefits of adjuvant radiochemotherapy and radiotherapy have never been demonstrated in any phase III randomized controlled trial. Chemotherapy with capecitabine 6 months is the standard of care in adjuvant setting. Radiochemotherapy is validated in R1 patients. It is not recommended in neoadjuvant situations given the lack of evidence. Chemotherapy and radiochemotherapy are validated in adjuvant or locally advanced diseases. Stereotactic radiation therapy offers an interesting perspective, at the cost of significant digestive toxicities, requiring evaluation in randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Moreau
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 5026, 63011 Clermont Ferrand cedex 1, France.
| | - M Lapeyre
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 5026, 63011 Clermont Ferrand cedex 1, France
| | - C Benoit
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 5026, 63011 Clermont Ferrand cedex 1, France
| | - D Pezet
- Département de chirurgie digestive et hépatobiliaire, centre hospitalier universitaire hôpital Estaing, 63003 Clermont Ferrand cedex 1, France
| | - J Biau
- Département de radiothérapie, centre Jean-Perrin, 58, rue Montalembert, BP 5026, 63011 Clermont Ferrand cedex 1, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gkika E, Hawkins MA, Grosu AL, Brunner TB. The Evolving Role of Radiation Therapy in the Treatment of Biliary Tract Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 10:604387. [PMID: 33381458 PMCID: PMC7768034 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.604387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Biliary tract cancers (BTC) are a disease entity comprising diverse epithelial tumors, which are categorized according to their anatomical location as intrahepatic (iCCA), perihilar (pCCA), distal (dCCA) cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas (GBC), with distinct epidemiology, biology, and prognosis. Complete surgical resection is the mainstay in operable BTC as it is the only potentially curative treatment option. Nevertheless, even after curative (R0) resection, the 5-year survival rate ranges between 20 and 40% and the disease free survival rates (DFS) is approximately 48–65% after one year and 23–35% after three years without adjuvant treatment. Improvements in adjuvant chemotherapy have improved the DFS, but the role of adjuvant radiotherapy is unclear. On the other hand, more than 50% of the patients present with unresectable disease at the time of diagnosis, which limits the prognosis to a few months without treatment. Herein, we review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma in the curative and palliative setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maria A Hawkins
- Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anca-Ligia Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Prognostic factors and patterns of recurrence after curative resection for patients with distal cholangiocarcinoma. Radiother Oncol 2020; 147:111-117. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2019] [Revised: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
11
|
Gamboa AC, Maithel SK. The Landmark Series: Gallbladder Cancer. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 27:2846-2858. [PMID: 32474816 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08654-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Given the rarity of gallbladder carcinoma, level I evidence to guide the multimodal treatment of this disease is lacking. Since 2010, four randomized phase III clinical trials including ABC-02, PRODIGE-12/ACCORD-18, BILCAP, and BCAT, and a single-arm phase II trial (SWOG0809) have been reported on the use of adjuvant strategies for biliary malignancies. These trials have led to the recommendation that patients with resected biliary tract cancer should be offered adjuvant capecitabine chemotherapy and those with R1 margins could be considered for chemoradiotherapy. Because there is no level I evidence to guide neoadjuvant therapy or surgical management, current consensus is based on strong retrospective data. The following review summarizes available trials and highlights the best available evidence that form the basis of consensus statements for the multimodal management of gallbladder carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adriana C Gamboa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mukai Y, Matsuyama R, Koike I, Kumamoto T, Kaizu H, Homma Y, Takano S, Sawada Y, Sugiura M, Yabushita Y, Ito E, Sato M, Endo I, Hata M. Outcome of postoperative radiation therapy for cholangiocarcinoma and analysis of dose-volume histogram of remnant liver. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019; 98:e16673. [PMID: 31374045 PMCID: PMC6709052 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000016673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to analyze dose-volume histogram (DVH) of the remnant liver for postoperative cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients, to find toxicity rates, and to confirm efficacy of postoperative radiation therapy (RT).Thirty-two postoperative CCA patients received partial liver resection and postoperative RT with curative intent. The "liver reduction rate" was calculated by contouring liver volume at computed tomography (CT) just before the surgery and at CT for planning the RT. To evaluate late toxicity, the radiation-induced hepatic toxicity (RIHT) was determined by the common terminology criteria for adverse events toxicity grade of bilirubin, aspartate transaminase, alanine transaminase, alkaline phosphatase, and albumin, and was defined from 3 months after RT until liver metastasis was revealed. The radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) was also evaluated.Tumor stages were distributed as follows: I: 1, II: 8, IIIA: 1, IIIB: 6, IIIC: 14, IVA: 2. Median prescribed total dose was 50 Gy. Median follow-up time was 27 months. Two-year overall survival (OS): 72.4%, disease-free survival: 47.7%, local control: 65.3%, and the median survival time was 40 months. The median "liver reduction rate" was 21%. The OS had statistically significant difference in nodal status (P = .032) and "liver reduction rate" >30% (P = .016). In the association between the ≥grade 2 RIHT and DVH, there were significantly differences in V30 and V40 (P = .041, P = .034), respectively. The grade ≥2 RIHT rates differ also significantly by sex (P = .008). Two patients (6.2%) were suspected of RILD.We suggest that RT for remnant liver should be considered the liver V30, V40 to prevent radiation-induced liver dysfunction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ryusei Matsuyama
- Departments of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | - Takafumi Kumamoto
- Departments of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | - Yuki Homma
- Departments of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | - Yu Sawada
- Departments of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | | | - Yasuhiro Yabushita
- Departments of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Eiko Ito
- Department of Radiation Oncology
| | | | - Itaru Endo
- Departments of Gastroenterological Surgery, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Koo T, Park HJ, Kim K. Radiation therapy for extrahepatic bile duct cancer: Current evidences and future perspectives. World J Clin Cases 2019; 7:1242-1252. [PMID: 31236388 PMCID: PMC6580339 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v7.i11.1242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2019] [Revised: 04/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Extrahepatic bile duct cancer (EBDC) is a rare malignancy that involves neoplastic changes extending from both hepatic ducts to the common bile duct. The treatment of choice is surgical resection, but the predominant pattern of initial treatment failure is locoregional recurrence. Accordingly, adjuvant radiotherapy has been administered after surgical resection based on these rationales. At this time, there is minimal evidence supporting adjuvant radiotherapy, because there have been no phase III trials evaluating its benefit. Relatively small retrospective studies have tried to compare outcomes associated with EBDC treated with or without radiotherapy. We aimed to review studies investigating adjuvant radiotherapy for resected EBDC. Because less than one-third of EBDC cases are amenable to curative resection at diagnosis, other locoregional treatment modalities need to be considered, including radiotherapy. The next aim of this review was to summarize reports of definitive radiotherapy for unresectable EBDC. Patients with advanced EBDC often experience biliary obstruction, which can lead to jaundice and progress to death. Biliary stent insertion is an important palliative procedure, but stents are prone to occlusion after subsequent ingrowth of the EBDC. Radiotherapy can be effective for maintaining the patency of inserted stents. We also reviewed the benefit of palliative radiotherapy combined with the biliary stent insertion. Lastly, we discuss the existing gaps in the evidence supporting radiotherapy in the management of EBDC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taeryool Koo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang 14068, South Korea
| | - Hae Jin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, South Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul 07985, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Boimel PJ, Binder KR, Hong TS, Feng M, Ben-Josef E. Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cases: An Expert Panel Case-Based Discussion. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:351-361. [PMID: 30309645 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder malignancies are aggressive gastrointestinal malignancies with management dependent on resectability, comorbidities, and location. A multidisciplinary discussion with medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, and surgeons is necessary to determine the optimal treatment approach for each patient. Surgical resection offers the best chance for a long-term cure. Recent studies, such as the phase II SWOG S0809 and the phase III BILCAP study have highlighted the importance of adjuvant treatment with radiation therapy and chemotherapy, respectively, in resected disease. In patients with unresectable disease chemotherapy and chemoradiation therapy to a high dose can improve overall survival and locoregional control. In this expert panel we have brought together radiation oncologists and a medical oncologist to provide case-based feedback on their institutional practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pamela J Boimel
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kim Reiss Binder
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Theodore S Hong
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Mary Feng
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of California, San Francisco, CA
| | - Edgar Ben-Josef
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
|
16
|
Elganainy D, Holliday EB, Taniguchi CM, Smith GL, Shroff R, Javle M, Raghav K, Kaseb A, Aloia TA, Vauthey JN, Tzeng CWD, Herman JM, Koong AC, Krishnan SX, Minsky BD, Crane CH, Das P, Koay EJ. Dose escalation of radiotherapy in unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Cancer Med 2018; 7:4880-4892. [PMID: 30152073 PMCID: PMC6198206 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1734] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2018] [Revised: 07/18/2018] [Accepted: 07/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the effect of escalated dose radiation therapy (EDR, defined as doses >50.4 Gy in 28 fractions [59.5 Gy BED]) on overall survival (OS), freedom from local progression (FFLP), and freedom from distant progression (FFDP) of patients with unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC). Methods A consecutive cohort of 80 patients who underwent radiotherapy for unresectable EHCC from 2001 to 2015 was identified. Demographic, tumor, treatment, toxicity, and laboratory variables were collected. The maximal RT doses ranged from 30 to 75 Gy (median 50.4 Gy, at 1.8‐4.5 Gy/fraction). Gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage by maximal dose in EDR group ranged from 38% to 100%. Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate OS, FFLP, and FFDP. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were analyzed. Results After radiotherapy, median OS, FFLP, and FFDP were 18.7, 22.6, and 24.3 months, respectively. There was no significant difference in OS or FFLP between patients who received EDR to portions of the GTV and patients who did not. On multivariate analysis, bigger GTV, age, and ECOG performance status were independently associated with shorter OS. Local progression on chemotherapy prior to RT was independently associated with shorter FFLP. High baseline neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (>5.3) was independently associated with shorter FFDP. Toxicity grades were similar in EDR and lower doses except lymphopenia which was higher in EDR (P = 0.053). Conclusions EDR to selective portions of the GTV may not benefit patients with unresectable EHCC despite having acceptable toxicity. New methods to improve local control and survival for unresectable EHCC are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalia Elganainy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Emma B Holliday
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Cullen M Taniguchi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Grace L Smith
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Rachna Shroff
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Kanwal Raghav
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ahmed Kaseb
- Department of GI Medical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Thomas A Aloia
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Albert C Koong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sunil X Krishnan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bruce D Minsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Prajnan Das
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
|
18
|
Gu B, Qian L, Yu H, Hu J, Wang Q, Shan J, Shi L, Liu H, Yang Q, Liang X, Cai X, Sun X. Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy in Curatively Resected Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Propensity Score–Matched Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:138-145. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.09.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2017] [Revised: 08/24/2017] [Accepted: 09/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
19
|
Clinical outcomes of salvage chemoradiotherapy for locally recurrent biliary tract cancer. TUMORI JOURNAL 2017; 103:345-352. [PMID: 28708225 DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for locally recurrent biliary tract cancer (BTC) after curative surgical resection. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with locally recurrent BTC treated with CCRT between October 2004 and December 2013. The study included and analyzed 42 patients with a history of curative-intent surgical resection of confirmed adenocarcinoma originating from the biliary tract. RESULTS The median time to recurrence after surgery was 16.1 months (range, 4.5-77.8 months). Median follow-up after CCRT was 26.9 months (range, 5.2-81.9) with no grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal toxicities. Analysis of the first site of failure showed local progression (LP) developed in 20 patients (47.6%); among these, 16 (38.1%) had isolated LP. The median values were 15.8 months (range, 1.7-81.7) for LP-free survival (LPFS), 10.6 months (range, 1.7 - 81.7) for progression-free survival (PFS) and 41.2 months (range, 5.2-81.9) for overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis showed that the level of pre-CCRT carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 and the chemotherapy regimen were significant prognostic factors for LPFS and PFS; pT stage was the only significant prognostic factor for OS. CONCLUSIONS CCRT for locally recurrent BTC showed promising outcomes as a salvage modality, but LP was still frequent. The pre-CCRT CA 19-9 level and the chemotherapy regimen were prognostic factors for LPFS and PFS.
Collapse
|
20
|
Sahai P, Kumar S. External radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma: available evidence. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20170061. [PMID: 28466653 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20170061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
This review aims to summarize the currently available evidence for the role of external radiotherapy and brachytherapy in the management of cholangiocarcinoma. High locoregional disease recurrence rates after surgical resection alone for both the extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) provide a rationale for using adjuvant radiotherapy with chemotherapy. We performed a literature search related to radiotherapy in cholangiocarcinoma published between 2000 and 2016. The role of radiation is discussed in the adjuvant, neoadjuvant, definitive and the palliative setting. Evidence from Phase II trials have demonstrated efficacy of adjuvant chemoradiation in combination with chemotherapy in EHCC. Locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma may be treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. In the case of downsizing, assessment for resection may be considered. Brachytherapy offers dose escalation after external radiotherapy. Selected unresectable cases of cholangiocarcinoma may be considered for stereotactic body radiation therapy with neoadjuvant and/or concurrent chemotherapy. Liver transplantation is a treatment option in selected patients with EHCC and IHCC after neoadjuvant chemoradiation. Stenting in combination with palliative external radiotherapy and/or brachytherapy provides improved stent patency and survival. Newer advanced radiation techniques provide a scope for achieving better disease control with reduced morbidity. Effective multimodality treatment incorporating radiotherapy is the way forward for improving survival in patients with cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Puja Sahai
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Senthil Kumar
- 2 Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kim YJ, Kim K, Min SK, Nam EM. Role of adjuvant radiotherapy for localized extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Br J Radiol 2017; 90:20160807. [PMID: 28118028 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20160807] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) after surgical resection for extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer. METHODS From 1997 to 2015, 59 patients with EHBD cancer were the subject of this study; 36 patients not undergoing adjuvant treatment after surgery (observation group) and 23 patients receiving adjuvant RT (RT group) were compared. Microscopic residual disease (R1) was in 9 (25%) patients and 5 (22%) patients, and macroscopic residual disease (R2) was in 2 (6%) patients and 6 (26%) patients in the observation and RT groups, respectively. Adjuvant RT was delivered to the tumour bed and regional lymph nodes up to 50.4 Gy (range, 45-61 Gy). RESULTS With a median follow-up of 19 months, local recurrence was observed in 10 (28%) patients and 2 (9%) patients in the observation and RT groups, respectively. On univariate analysis, the 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates were 50% in the observation group and 54% in the RT group (p = 0.401). The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 29.3% in the observation group and 26.3% in the RT group (p = 0.602). On multivariable analysis, however, adjuvant RT significantly improved LRFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.310; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.100-0.963; p = 0.043] and had a trend towards increased OS (HR, 0.491; 95% CI, 0.219-1.102; p = 0.085). Resection margin (RM) status was also correlated with LRFS (HR for R1 6.134, 95% CI 2.051-18.344; and HR for R2 18.551, 95% CI 3.680-93.520; p < 0.001) and OS (HR for R1 1.816, 95% CI 0.853-3.867; and HR for R2 3.564, 95% CI 1.175-10.809; p = 0.054). CONCLUSION RM status was a significant prognosticator of EHBD cancer, and adjuvant RT improved local control rate; thereby, survival rate might be increased. Advances in knowledge: The benefit of adjuvant RT in EHBD cancer was demonstrated via comparison with observation group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Jun Kim
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyubo Kim
- 1 Department of Radiation Oncology, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seog Ki Min
- 2 Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eun Mi Nam
- 3 Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University School of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nantajit D, Trirussapanich P, Rojwatkarnjana S, Soonklang K, Pattaranutraporn P, Laebua K, Chamchod S. Clinical analysis of cholangiocarcinoma patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. Mol Clin Oncol 2017; 5:797-802. [PMID: 28105359 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2016.1072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2015] [Accepted: 04/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) or bile duct cancer is a rare cancer type in developed countries, while its prevalence is increased in southeast Asia, affecting ~33.4 men and ~12.3 women per 100,000 individuals. CCA is one of the most lethal types of cancer. Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant therapies have been shown to have limited efficacy in improving the overall prognosis of patients. Radiotherapy has been reported to prolong the survival times of patients with certain characteristics. The present study retrospectively evaluated the medical records and follow-up data from 27 CCA patients who received radiotherapy at Chulabhorn Hospital (Bangkok, Thailand) between 2008 and 2014. A total of 14 patients underwent surgery followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Of the 27 CCA patients, 14 had intrahepatic CCA, 2 had extrahepatic CCA and 11 had hilar CCA. The 2-year survival rate was 40.7%. Tumor resectability, clinical symptoms and the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score were found to be indicative of patient prognosis. In addition, the planning target volume and biologically effective radiotherapy dose were of prognostic value; however, initial treatment response was ambiguous in predicting survival time. The findings of the present study suggested that the currently used radiotherapy protocols for CCA may require modification to improve their efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danupon Nantajit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | | | | | | | | | - Kanyanee Laebua
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Sasikarn Chamchod
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chulabhorn Hospital, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for locally advanced extrahepatic and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Adv Radiat Oncol 2016; 1:237-243. [PMID: 28740893 PMCID: PMC5514222 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2016.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2016] [Revised: 09/30/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives We report single-institution clinical efficacy and safety outcomes for patients with unresectable locally advanced cholangiocarcinoma who were treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and a subset of patients who received neoadjuvant SBRT and chemotherapy as part of an orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) protocol. Methods and materials From October 2008 to June 2015, 31 consecutive patients with unresectable extrahepatic (n = 25) or intrahepatic (n = 6) cholangiocarcinoma were treated with SBRT and retrospectively analyzed. Four patients underwent liver transplantation, and 1 underwent resection. SBRT was delivered in 5 fractions with a median dose of 40 Gy. Toxicity was scored using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. Overall survival (OS), time to progression, and local control were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results The median follow-up time was 11.5 months. The 1- and 2-year OS rates were 59% and 33%, respectively, with a median survival of 15.7 months. The 1- and 2-year freedom from progression was 67% and 34%, respectively. Median time to progression was 16.8 months. Nine patients had local failure. The actuarial 1- and 2-year local control rates were 78% and 47%, respectively. Among patients who also had OLT, the median OS was 31.3 months. Twenty-four patients (77%) experienced some form of acute grade 1-2 toxicity, most commonly fatigue or pain. Five patients (16%) experienced grade ≥3 toxicity. Conclusions SBRT is a promising option for patients with unresectable or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma either as a component of neoadjuvant therapy prior to OLT or as part of definitive therapy for patients who are unresectable and not eligible for transplantation.
Collapse
|
24
|
Kaupp-Roberts SD, Yadegarfar G, Friend E, O'Donnell CM, Valle JW, Byrne C, Bahar I, Finch-Jones M, Gillmore R, Johnson CD, Pereira SP, Wiggers JK, Pinto M, Al-Sarireh B, Ramage JK. Validation of the EORTC QLQ-BIL21 questionnaire for measuring quality of life in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and cancer of the gallbladder. Br J Cancer 2016; 115:1032-1038. [PMID: 27673364 PMCID: PMC5117782 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2016.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2016] [Revised: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: There is no specific quality of life (QoL) measurement tool to quantify QoL in patients with biliary tract cancer. Quality of life measurement is an increasingly crucial trial end point and is now being incorporated into clinical practice. Methods: This International Multicentre Phase IV Validation Study assessed the QLQ-BIL21 module in 172 patients with cholangiocarcinoma and 91 patients with cancer of the gallbladder. Patients completed the questionnaire at baseline pretherapy and subsequently at 2 months. Following this, the psychometric properties of reliability, validity, scale structure and responsiveness to change were analysed. Results: Analysis of the QLQ-BIL21 scales showed appropriate reliability with Cronbach's α-coefficients >0.70 for all scales overall. Intraclass correlations exceeded 0.80 for all scales. Convergent validity >0.40 was demonstrated for all items within scales, and discriminant validity was confirmed with values <0.70 for all scales compared with each other. Scale scores changed in accordance with Karnofsky performance status and in response to clinical change. Conclusions: The QLQ-BIL21 is a valid tool for the assessment of QoL in patients with cholangiocarcinoma and cancer of the gallbladder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S D Kaupp-Roberts
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, UK.,Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Winchester, Sparkford Road, Winchester SO22 4NR, UK
| | - G Yadegarfar
- School of Public Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - E Friend
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, UK
| | - C M O'Donnell
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, UK
| | - J W Valle
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Withington, Manchester M20 4BX, UK
| | - C Byrne
- Hepatobiliary Cancer Services, Aintree University Hospital, Longmoor Lane, Liverpool, Merseyside L9 7AL, UK
| | - I Bahar
- Cachar Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Meherpur, Silchar, Assam, India
| | - M Finch-Jones
- Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust, Upper Maudlin Street, Bristol BS2 8HW, UK
| | - R Gillmore
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, Pond Street, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | - C D Johnson
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - S P Pereira
- UCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Royal Free Hospital Campus, London NW3 2QG, UK
| | - J K Wiggers
- Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam 1105 AZ, Netherlands
| | - M Pinto
- National Cancer Institute and G. Pascale Foundation of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - B Al-Sarireh
- Morriston Hospital, ABM University Health Board, Heol Maes Eglwys, Morriston, Swansea SA6 6NL, UK
| | - J K Ramage
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Hampshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Aldermaston Road, Basingstoke RG24 9NA, UK.,Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Boothe D, Hopkins Z, Frandsen J, Lloyd S. Comparison of external beam radiation and brachytherapy to external beam radiation alone for unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Oncol 2016; 7:580-7. [PMID: 27563448 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2016.03.14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC) is a rare malignancy with a relatively poor prognosis. There are no randomized, prospective data to help define the optimal method of radiation delivery for unresectable EHC. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the benefit of adding brachytherapy to external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for unresectable EHC. METHODS A retrospective review of 1,326 patients with unresectable EHC using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was completed. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to analyze the primary endpoint, overall survival. Univariate and multivariate analysis was performed to identify and control for potential confounding variables, including age at diagnosis, sex, stage, grade, histology, race, year of diagnosis, and reason for no surgery. RESULTS Of the 1,326 patients with unresectable EHC, 1,188 (92.9%) received EBRT only, while 91 (7.1%) received both EBRT and brachytherapy. Patients receiving combined modality radiation therapy were more likely to be treated prior to the year 2000. Median overall survival for patients receiving EBRT and EBRT plus brachytherapy was 9 and 11 months, respectively (P=0.04). Cause specific survival was 12 months for those receiving EBRT only, and 15 months for those who received EBRT + brachytherapy (P=0.10). Survival analysis performed on patients with locoregional disease only revealed a trend towards prolonged overall survival with those receiving EBRT + brachytherapy (P=0.08). Multivariate analysis revealed grade and stage of disease were correlated with both overall survival and cause specific survival (P≤0.05). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with unresectable EHC, the addition of brachytherapy to EBRT is associated with a prolonged median overall survival. However, the use of brachytherapy boost decreased in the last decade of the study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin Boothe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Zachary Hopkins
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Jonathan Frandsen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Shane Lloyd
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Hospital, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Brunner TB, Seufferlein T. Radiation therapy in cholangiocellular carcinomas. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2016; 30:593-602. [PMID: 27644907 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2016.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/17/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma can arise in all parts of the biliary tract and this has implications for therapy. Surgery is the mainstay of therapy however local relapse is a major problem. Therefore, adjuvant treatment with chemoradiotherapy was tested in trials. The SWOG-S0809 trial regimen of chemoradiotherapy which was tested in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and in gallbladder cancer can currently be regarded as highest level of evidence for this indication. In contrast to adjuvant therapy where only conventionally fractionated radiotherapy plays a role, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) today has become a powerful alternative to chemoradiotherapy for definitive treatment due to the ability to administer higher doses of radiotherapy to improve local control. Sequential combinations with chemotherapy are also frequently employed. Nevertheless, in general cholangiocarcinoma is an orphan disease and future clinical trials will have to improve the available level of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Str. 3, Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Thomas Seufferlein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ulm University, Albert-Einstein-Allee 23, D-89081, Ulm, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Okabe H, Chikamoto A, Maruno M, Hashimoto D, Imai K, Taki K, Arima K, Ishiko T, Uchiyama H, Ikegami T, Harimoto N, Itoh S, Yoshizumi T, Beppu T, Baba H, Maehara Y. A long survivor with local relapse of hilar cholangiocarcinoma after R1 surgery treated with chemoradiotherapy: a case report and literature review. Surg Case Rep 2016; 2:69. [PMID: 27376654 PMCID: PMC4932008 DOI: 10.1186/s40792-016-0195-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2016] [Accepted: 06/22/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment outcome of extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma remains insufficient because it is difficult to obtain accurate diagnosis of tumor spreading and effective treatment agent is quite limited in spite of substantial current efforts, all of which have been unsuccessful except for gemcitabine plus cisplatin. The patient was a 60-year-old female who had developed hilar cholangiocarcinoma and underwent extrahepatic bile duct resection. Although it was conceivable that it would be the R1 resection, the patient wanted to receive limited resection to avoid postoperative complication mainly because she was depressed. In histology, interstitial spreading of tumor was appreciated at the surgical margin of bile duct. The patient did not accept to receive the additional treatment after the surgery and hardly visited the hospital to take the periodical test for monitoring the residual cancer cells. As expected, the local relapse of tumor was appreciated 1 year after the R1 surgery. She chose radiotherapy and agreed with subsequent S-1 treatment for 26 months. Consequently, elevated CA19-9 was decreased, and local relapse has been successfully controlled for more than 7 years after the relapse of tumor. Here, we report quite a rare case in terms of long survivor after chemoradiotherapy on locally relapsed unresectable hilar cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirohisa Okabe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.,Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Akira Chikamoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Masataka Maruno
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Daisuke Hashimoto
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Katsunori Imai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Katsunobu Taki
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Kota Arima
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Takatoshi Ishiko
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hideaki Uchiyama
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Toru Ikegami
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Norifumi Harimoto
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Shinji Itoh
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Toru Beppu
- Department of Multidisciplinary Treatment for Gastroenterological Cancer, Kumamoto University Hospital, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
| | - Yoshihiko Maehara
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Tanenbaum DG, Hall WA, Mittal P, Nickleach DC, Mikell JL, Colbert LE, Moreno CC, Squires MH, Fisher SB, Yu DS, Kooby DA, Maithel SK, Landry JC. Cholangiocarcinoma size on magnetic resonance imaging versus pathologic specimen: Implications for radiation treatment planning. Pract Radiat Oncol 2016; 6:201-206. [PMID: 26979545 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Revised: 09/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/08/2015] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The accuracy of abdominal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in measuring gross tumor volume in patients with resectable cholangiocarcinoma (CC) is unknown. CC is a highly difficult tumor to visualize and treatment with dose-escalated radiation therapy requires clear tumor delineation. We aim to investigate the concordance between imaging and pathologic size in patients with resected CC to determine the usefulness of MRI for image guided treatment modalities. METHODS AND MATERIALS The records of 51 patients with resected CC who underwent preoperative MRI were evaluated. Each preoperative MRI was individually reviewed by a diagnostic radiologist (P.M.), who was blinded to pathologic measurements. A combination of dynamic multiphase contrast-enhanced T1- and T2-weighted images, original imaging reports, and pathologic reports were reviewed for greatest tumor dimensions. A general linear regression model was used to examine the outcome MRI minus pathology using MRI report, T1-weighted measurement, or T2-weighted measurement. A multivariable regression model was fit to assess the association of other factors with pathologic underestimation. RESULTS The median age was 69 years. Eleven tumors were categorized distal/extrahepatic, 17 hilar, and 23 intrahepatic CC. The median tumor size on pathology report was 3.00 cm (range, 0.3-19). The median tumor size from the MRI report was 3 cm (range, 0.80-16.20) and median tumor size on independent radiological review was 3 cm (range, 0.90-17) on the T1-weighted and 3 cm (range, 0.90-17) on the T2-weighted MRI sequences. When compared with pathologic tumor size, the MRI report dimension was found to underestimate tumor size by 4.1 mm (P = .04). On multivariable analysis, pathologic size underestimation was influenced by increasing tumor size (slope, -0.20; P < .001); however, underestimation was not affected by tumor location or MRI sequence. CONCLUSIONS MRI underestimates tumor size, which was more pronounced with larger tumors, but not influenced by tumor location. The potential for gross tumor volume underestimation should be considered when planning highly conformal radiation therapy treatment of CC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G Tanenbaum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Pardeep Mittal
- Department of Radiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Dana C Nickleach
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Shared Resource at Winship, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - John L Mikell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Lauren E Colbert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Courtney C Moreno
- Department of Radiology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Malcolm H Squires
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Sarah B Fisher
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David S Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - David A Kooby
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jerome C Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atlanta, Georgia; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bridgewater JA, Goodman KA, Kalyan A, Mulcahy MF. Biliary Tract Cancer: Epidemiology, Radiotherapy, and Molecular Profiling. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2016; 35:e194-e203. [PMID: 27249723 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_160831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 128] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
Biliary tract cancer, or cholangiocarcinoma, arises from the biliary epithelium of the small ducts in the periphery of the liver (intrahepatic) and the main ducts of the hilum (extrahepatic), extending into the gallbladder. The incidence and epidemiology of biliary tract cancer are fluid and complex. It is shown that intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is on the rise in the Western world, and gallbladder cancer is on the decline. Radiation therapy has emerged as an important component of adjuvant therapy for resected disease and definitive therapy for locally advanced disease. The emerging sophisticated techniques of imaging tumors and conformal dose delivery are expanding the indications for radiotherapy in the management of bile duct tumors. As we understand more about the molecular pathways driving biliary tract cancers, targeted therapies are at the forefront of new therapeutic combinations. Understanding the gene expression profile and mutational burden in biliary tract cancer allows us to better discern the pathogenesis and identify promising new developmental therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John A Bridgewater
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Karyn A Goodman
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Aparna Kalyan
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Mary F Mulcahy
- From the UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO; Northwestern University, Chicago, IL; Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Gallbladder Cancer in the 21st Century. JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2015; 2015:967472. [PMID: 26421012 PMCID: PMC4569807 DOI: 10.1155/2015/967472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 185] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2015] [Revised: 08/07/2015] [Accepted: 08/12/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an uncommon disease in the majority of the world despite being the most common and aggressive malignancy of the biliary tree. Early diagnosis is essential for improved prognosis; however, indolent and nonspecific clinical presentations with a paucity of pathognomonic/predictive radiological features often preclude accurate identification of GBC at an early stage. As such, GBC remains a highly lethal disease, with only 10% of all patients presenting at a stage amenable to surgical resection. Among this select population, continued improvements in survival during the 21st century are attributable to aggressive radical surgery with improved surgical techniques. This paper reviews the current available literature of the 21st century on PubMed and Medline to provide a detailed summary of the epidemiology and risk factors, pathogenesis, clinical presentation, radiology, pathology, management, and prognosis of GBC.
Collapse
|
31
|
Ben-Josef E, Guthrie KA, El-Khoueiry AB, Corless CL, Zalupski MM, Lowy AM, Thomas CR, Alberts SR, Dawson LA, Micetich KC, Thomas MB, Siegel AB, Blanke CD. SWOG S0809: A Phase II Intergroup Trial of Adjuvant Capecitabine and Gemcitabine Followed by Radiotherapy and Concurrent Capecitabine in Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2015; 33:2617-22. [PMID: 25964250 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.60.2219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 264] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The role of postoperative therapy in extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) or gallbladder carcinoma (GBCA) is unknown. S0809 was designed to estimate 2-year survival (overall and after R0 or R1 resection), pattern of relapse, and toxicity in patients treated with this adjuvant regimen. PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility criteria included diagnosis of EHCC or GBCA after radical resection, stage pT2-4 or N+ or positive resection margins, M0, and performance status 0 to 1. Patients received four cycles of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) and capecitabine (1,500 mg/m(2) per day on days 1 to 14) every 21 days followed by concurrent capecitabine (1,330 mg/m(2) per day) and radiotherapy (45 Gy to regional lymphatics; 54 to 59.4 Gy to tumor bed). With 80 evaluable patients, results would be promising if 2-year survival 95% CI were > 45% and R0 and R1 survival estimates were ≥ 65% and 45%, respectively. RESULTS A total of 79 eligible patients (R0, n = 54; R1, n = 25; EHCC, 68%; GBCA, 32%) were treated (86% completed). For all patients, 2-year survival was 65% (95% CI, 53% to 74%); it was 67% and 60% in R0 and R1 patients, respectively. Median overall survival was 35 months (R0, 34 months; R1, 35 months). Local, distant, and combined relapse occurred in 14, 24, and nine patients. Grade 3 and 4 adverse effects were observed in 52% and 11% of patients, respectively. The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse effects were neutropenia (44%), hand-foot syndrome (11%), diarrhea (8%), lymphopenia (8%), and leukopenia (6%). There was one death resulting from GI hemorrhage. CONCLUSION This combination was well tolerated, has promising efficacy, and provides clinicians with a well-supported regimen. Our trial establishes the feasibility of conducting national adjuvant trials in EHCC and GBCA and provides baseline data for planning future phase III trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edgar Ben-Josef
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY.
| | - Katherine A Guthrie
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Anthony B El-Khoueiry
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Christopher L Corless
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Mark M Zalupski
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Andrew M Lowy
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Charles R Thomas
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Steven R Alberts
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Kenneth C Micetich
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Melanie B Thomas
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Abby B Siegel
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| | - Charles D Blanke
- Edgar Ben-Josef, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Katherine A. Guthrie, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA; Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles; Andrew M. Lowy, University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center, La Jolla, CA; Christopher L. Corless, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Diagnostic Laboratories; Charles R. Thomas Jr and Charles D. Blanke, Oregon Health and Science University Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR; Mark M. Zalupski, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Steven R. Alberts, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Laura A. Dawson, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Kenneth C. Micetich, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Melanie B. Thomas, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC; and Abby B. Siegel, Columbia University, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Jung DH, Kim MS, Cho CK, Yoo HJ, Jang WI, Seo YS, Paik EK, Kim KB, Han CJ, Kim SB. Outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy for unresectable primary or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma. Radiat Oncol J 2014; 32:163-9. [PMID: 25324988 PMCID: PMC4194299 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2014.32.3.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2014] [Revised: 07/29/2014] [Accepted: 08/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To report the results of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for unresectable primary or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma. Materials and Methods From January 2005 through August 2013, 58 patients with unresectable primary (n = 28) or recurrent (n = 30) cholangiocarcinoma treated by SBRT were retrospectively analyzed. The median prescribed dose was 45 Gy in 3 fractions (range, 15 to 60 Gy in 1-5 fractions). Patients were treated by SBRT only (n = 53) or EBRT + SBRT boost (n = 5). The median tumor volume was 40 mL (range, 5 to 1,287 mL). Results The median follow-up duration was 10 months (range, 1 to 97 months). The 1-year, 2-year overall survival rates, and median survival were 45%, 20%, and 10 months, respectively. The median survival for primary group and recurrent group were 5 and 13 months, respectively. Local control rate at 1-year and 2-year were 85% and 72%, respectively. Disease progression-free survival rates at 1-year and 2-year were 26% and 23%, respectively. In univariate analysis, ECOG performance score (0-1 vs. 2-3), treatment volume (<50 vs. ≥50 mL), and pre-SBRT CEA level (<5 vs. ≥5 ng/mL) were significant in overall survival rate. In multivariate analysis, ECOG score (p = 0.037) and tumor volume (p = 0.030) were statistically significant. In the recurrent tumor group, patients with >12 months interval from surgery to recurrence showed statistically significant higher overall survival rate than those with ≤12 months (p = 0.026). Six patients (10%) experienced ≥grade 3 complications. Conclusion SBRT can be considered as an effective local modality for unresectable primary or recurrent cholangiocarcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da Hoon Jung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul Koo Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyung Jun Yoo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Seok Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Kyung Paik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kum Bae Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul Ju Han
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Bum Kim
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological & Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jacob J, Nguyen F, Deutsch E, Mornex F. [Stereotactic body radiation therapy in the management of liver tumours]. Cancer Radiother 2014; 18:486-94. [PMID: 25195113 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.07.145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2014] [Revised: 07/09/2014] [Accepted: 07/14/2014] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiotherapy is a high-precision technique based on the administration of high doses to a limited target volume. This treatment constitutes a therapeutic progress in the management of many tumours, especially hepatic ones. If surgery remains the standard local therapy, stereotactic radiotherapy is first dedicated to inoperable patients or unresectable tumours. Patients with moderately altered general status, preserved liver function and tumour lesions limited in number as in size are eligible to this technique. Results in terms of local control are satisfying, regarding primary tumours (notably hepatocellular carcinomas) as metastases stemming from various origins. If treatment protocols and follow-up modalities are not standardized to this day, iconographic acquisition using four-dimensional computed tomography, target volumes delineation based on morphological and/or metabolic data, and image-guided radiotherapy contribute to an oncologic efficacy and an improved sparing of the functional liver. The purpose of this literature review is to report the results of the main works having assessed stereotactic radiotherapy in the management of primary and secondary liver tumours. Technical particularities of this radiation modality will also be described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Jacob
- Service d'oncologie-radiothérapie, hôpital d'instruction des armées du Val-de-Grâce, 74, boulevard de Port-Royal, 75230 Paris cedex 05, France.
| | - F Nguyen
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - E Deutsch
- Département de radiothérapie, institut de cancérologie Gustave-Roussy, 114, rue Édouard-Vaillant, 94805 Villejuif cedex, France
| | - F Mornex
- Service de radiothérapie-oncologie, centre hospitalier Lyon-Sud, 165, chemin du Grand-Revoyet, 69310 Pierre-Bénite, France; EMR 3738, université Claude-Bernard Lyon 1, 69373 Lyon cedex 08, France
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Chopra S, Mathew AS, Engineer R, Shrivastava SK. Positioning high-dose radiation in multidisciplinary management of unresectable cholangiocarcinomas: review of current evidence. Indian J Gastroenterol 2014; 33:401-7. [PMID: 25135161 DOI: 10.1007/s12664-014-0495-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 07/07/2014] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma is a rare malignancy of the bile ducts. The current standard of care for unresectable nonmetastatic disease is doublet systemic chemotherapy, which provides a median survival of 11.7 months. Although chemoradiation is a therapeutic option that provides almost equivalent or superior survival, the lack of level I evidence presents a major hurdle in routinely recommending it within multidisciplinary clinics. This mini review presents the current evidence on the use of chemoradiation for unresectable nonmetastatic cholangiocarcinoma and rationale for positioning it within multidisciplinary management of unresectable cholangiocarcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Navi Mumbai, 410 210, India,
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sirohi B, Singh A, Jagannath P, Shrikhande SV. Chemotherapy and targeted therapy for gall bladder cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 2014; 5:134-41. [PMID: 25114467 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-014-0317-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2014] [Accepted: 05/13/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gall bladder cancer is a common cancer in the Ganges belt of North-eastern India. In view of incidental diagnosis of gall bladder cancer by physicians and surgeons, the treatment is not optimised. Most patients present in advanced stages and surgery remains the only option to cure. This review highlights the current evidence in advances in systemic therapy of gall bladder cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhawna Sirohi
- Department of Medical Oncology, TMC Tata Memorial Centre, Parel Mumbai, 400012 India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Department of Medical Oncology, TMC Tata Memorial Centre, Parel Mumbai, 400012 India
| | - P Jagannath
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lilavati Hospital and Research centre, Tata Memorial Centre (TMC), Mumbai, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hennedige TP, Neo WT, Venkatesh SK. Imaging of malignancies of the biliary tract- an update. Cancer Imaging 2014; 14:14. [PMID: 25608662 PMCID: PMC4331820 DOI: 10.1186/1470-7330-14-14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Accepted: 03/20/2014] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Malignancies of the biliary tract include cholangiocarcinoma, gallbladder cancers and carcinoma of the ampulla of Vater. Biliary tract adenocarcinomas are the second most common primary hepatobiliary cancer. Due to their slow growing nature, non-specific and late symptomatology, these malignancies are often diagnosed in advanced stages with poor prognosis. Apart from incidental discovery of gall bladder carcinoma upon cholecystectomy, early stage biliary tract cancers are now detected with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP). Accurate characterization and staging of these indolent cancers will determine outcome as majority of the patients' are inoperable at the time of presentation. Ultrasound is useful for initial evaluation of the biliary tract and gallbladder masses and in determining the next suitable modality for further evaluation. Multimodality imaging plays an integral role in the management of the biliary tract malignancies. The imaging techniques most useful are MRI with MRCP, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and positron emission tomography (PET). In this review we will discuss epidemiology and the role of imaging in detection, characterization and management of the biliary tract malignancies under the three broad categories of cholangiocarcinomas (intra- and extrahepatic), gallbladder cancers and ampullary carcinomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiffany Priyanthi Hennedige
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore
| | - Wee Thong Neo
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National University Health System, 5 Lower Kent Ridge Road, Singapore 119074, Singapore
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Williams TM, Majithia L, Wang SJ, Thomas CR. Defining the Role of Adjuvant Therapy: Cholangiocarcinoma and Gall Bladder Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2014; 24:94-104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2014.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
38
|
Lee SJ, Kwon W, Kang MJ, Jang JY, Chang YR, Jung W, Kim SW. Clinical features and survival outcome of locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. KOREAN JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SURGERY 2014; 18:1-8. [PMID: 26155239 PMCID: PMC4492336 DOI: 10.14701/kjhbps.2014.18.1.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2013] [Revised: 10/10/2013] [Accepted: 10/30/2013] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUNDS/AIMS Little is known about clinical features and survival outcome in locally advanced unresectable extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC). The aim was to investigate the clinical features and the survival outcome in these patients, and to evaluate the role of palliative resections in locally advanced unresectable EHC. METHODS Between 1995 and 2007, 280 patients with locally advanced unresectable EHC were identified. Clinical, pathologic, and survival data were investigated. A comparative analysis was done between those who received palliative resection (PR) and those who were not operated on (NR). RESULTS The overall median survival of the study population was 10±1 months, and the 3- and 5-year survival rates (YSR) were 8.5% and 2.5%, respectively. The median survival, 3- and 5-YSR of PR were 23 months, 32.1% and 13.1%, respectively. For NR, they were 9 months, 3.9% and 0%, which were significantly worse than PR (p<0.001). In univariate analysis, T classification, N classification, tumor location, palliative resection, adjuvant treatment, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy were factors that showed survival difference between PR and NR. Regional lymph node metastasis (RR, 2.084; 95% CI, 1.491-2.914; p<0.001), non-resections (RR, 2.270; 95% CI, 1.497-3.443; p<0.001), and no chemotherapy (RR, 1.604; 95% CI, 1.095-2.349; p=0.015) were identified as risk factors for poor outcome on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS Without evidence of systemic disease, palliative resection may provide some survival benefit in selected locally advanced unresectable EHCs and adjuvant treatment may further improve survival outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang-Jae Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mee Joo Kang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ye Rim Chang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woohyun Jung
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun-Whe Kim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Makita C, Nakamura T, Takada A, Takayama K, Suzuki M, Ishikawa Y, Azami Y, Kato T, Tsukiyama I, Kikuchi Y, Hareyama M, Murakami M, Fuwa N, Hata M, Inoue T. Clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton beam therapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2014; 9:26. [PMID: 24422711 PMCID: PMC3904195 DOI: 10.1186/1748-717x-9-26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2013] [Accepted: 01/09/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We examined the efficacy and toxicity of proton beam therapy (PBT) for treating advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Methods The clinical data and outcomes of 28 cholangiocarcinoma patients treated with PBT between January 2009 and August 2011 were retrospectively examined. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local control (LC) rates, and the log-rank test to analyze the effects of different clinical and treatment variables on survival. Acute and late toxicities were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. Results The median age of the 17 male and 11 female patients was 71 years (range, 41 to 84 years; intrahepatic/peripheral cholangiocarcinoma, n = 6; hilar cholangiocarcinoma/Klatskin tumor, n = 6; distal extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, n = 3; gallbladder cancer, n = 3; local or lymph node recurrence, n = 10; size, 20–175 mm; median 52 mm). The median radiation dose was 68.2 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) (range, 50.6 to 80 Gy (RBE)), with delivery of fractions of 2.0 to 3.2 Gy (RBE) daily. The median follow-up duration was 12 months (range, 3 to 29 months). Fifteen patients underwent chemotherapy and 8 patients, palliative biliary stent placement prior to PBT. OS, PFS, and LC rates at 1 year were 49.0%, 29.5%, and 67.7%, respectively. LC was achieved in 6 patients, and was better in patients administered a biologically equivalent dose of 10 (BED10) > 70 Gy compared to those administered < 70 Gy (83.1% vs. 22.2%, respectively, at 1 year). The variables of tumor size and performance status were associated with survival. Late gastrointestinal toxicities grade 2 or greater were observed in 7 patients <12 months after PBT. Cholangitis was observed in 11 patients and 3 patients required stent replacement. Conclusions Relatively high LC rates after PBT for advanced cholangiocarcinoma can be achieved by delivery of a BED10 > 70 Gy. Gastrointestinal toxicities, especially those of the duodenum, are dose-limiting toxicities associated with PBT, and early metastatic progression remains a treatment obstacle.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiyoko Makita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Southern Tohoku Proton Therapy Center, 7-172, Yatsuyamada, 963-8052 Koriyama, Fukushima, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yi SW, Kang DR, Kim KS, Park MS, Seong J, Park JY, Bang SM, Song SY, Chung JB, Park SW. Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine in locally advanced biliary tract cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2013; 73:191-8. [PMID: 24322374 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-013-2340-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2013] [Accepted: 10/24/2013] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE There is no established standard treatment for patients with locally advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). METHODS We analyzed the treatment results of locally advanced BTC from Jan 1995 to Dec 2010 at single institution of South Korea with retrospective study. One hundred and seventy-six patients were eligible to investigate the treatment response and toxicity. We treated these patients with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)- or gemcitabine (GEM)-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) or best supportive care (BSC). The primary end point was overall survival. RESULTS Of these locally advanced BTC patients, 106 patients received CCRT and 70 patients were treated with BSC. The median overall survival was 42.57 weeks (95 % confidence interval [CI], 35.85-49.30) in CCRT group and 13.29 weeks (95 % CI 10.42-16.15) in BSC group (P < 0.001). Nausea and anemia were the most common toxicities observed. CONCLUSIONS Patients with locally advanced BTC who were treated with 5-FU-based or GEM-based CCRT seem to have a better survival than those who received BSC. The treatment-related toxicity was mild. GEM-based or 5-FU-based CCRT showed similar survival advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Woo Yi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Gastroenterology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, 120-752, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Moureau-Zabotto L, Turrini O, Resbeut M, Raoul JL, Giovannini M, Poizat F, Piana G, Delpero JR, Bertucci F. Impact of radiotherapy in the management of locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. BMC Cancer 2013; 13:568. [PMID: 24299517 PMCID: PMC4219485 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2013] [Accepted: 11/05/2013] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Optimal therapy for patients with unresectable locally advanced extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ULAC) remains controversial. We analysed the role of radiotherapy in the management of such tumors. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients treated in our institution with conformal-3D external-beam-radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without concurrent chemotherapy. RESULTS Thirty patients were included: 24 with a primary tumor (group 1) and 6 with a local relapse (group 2). Toxicity was low. Among 25 patients assessable for EBRT response, we observed 9 complete responses, 4 partial responses, 10 stabilisations, and 2 progressions. The median follow-up was 12 months. Twenty out of 30 patients (66%) experienced a relapse, which was metastatic in 75% of cases in the whole series, 87% in group 1, 60% in group 2 (p = 0.25). Twenty-eight patients (93%) died of relapse or disease complications. Median overall survivals in the whole group and in group 1 or 2 were respectively 12, 11 and 21 months (p = 0.11). The 1-year and 3-year progression-free survivals were respectively 38% and 16% in the whole series; 31% and 11% in group 1, 67% and 33% in group 2 (p = 0.35). CONCLUSION EBRT seems efficient to treat ULAC, with acceptable toxicity. For primary disease, the high rate of metastatic relapse suggests to limit EBRT to non-progressive patients after induction chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurence Moureau-Zabotto
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, 232 Boulevard de Sainte Marguerite, 13009 Marseille, France.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
State-of-the-art in the management of locally advanced and metastatic gallbladder cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2013; 25:425-31. [PMID: 23635800 DOI: 10.1097/cco.0b013e3283620fd8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC), classified as a biliary tract cancer (BTC) along with intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, is a rare disease in Western countries, but a highly prevalent disease in Chile, other countries in Latin America, India and Japan. It commonly presents at an advanced stage, and has limited therapeutic options. Cisplatin/gemcitabine has emerged as the first-line standard of care for patients with advanced BTCs, but the prognosis remains poor. Development of molecularly targeted therapies in advanced BTC remains challenging. RECENT FINDINGS Comprehension of the molecular events in gallbladder carcinogenesis may provide a novel targeted therapeutic approach, and early stage clinical trials with targeted therapies appear promising, although the relationship between subsets of patients with positive responses to therapy and tumor genetics requires further exploration. Recent developments in targeted therapeutics, directed against several key signalling pathways in BTC, including epidermal growth factor receptor, angiogenesis, and the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway will be discussed, in addition to the potential application of prognostic factors and markers. SUMMARY The future therapeutic spectrum for BTC and GBC will likely encompass novel combinations of targeted therapies with cytostatics in scientifically and molecularly directed schedules, thus permitting fewer mechanisms of escape for tumor cells.
Collapse
|
43
|
Halfdanarson TR, Haraldsdottir S, Borad MJ. Advances in systemic therapy for advanced pancreatobiliary malignancies. F1000Res 2013; 2:105. [PMID: 24327864 PMCID: PMC3752657 DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.2-105.v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/22/2013] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Pancreatobiliary malignancies are relatively uncommon and the overall prognosis is poor. Treatment options for advanced disease are limited to systemic therapy for metastatic disease and a combination of systemic therapy and radiation therapy for locally advanced but unresectable tumors. There have been significant advances in the treatment of pancreatobiliary cancers in recent years but the prognosis for patient survival remains disappointingly poor. We review the current treatment options for locally advanced pancreatobiliary malignancies and highlight recent advances in systemic therapy, including novel approaches using targeted treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Mitesh J Borad
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Koh HK, Park HJ, Kim K, Chie EK, Min HS, Ha SW. Molecular biomarkers in extrahepatic bile duct cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy for gross residual disease after surgery. Radiat Oncol J 2012; 30:197-204. [PMID: 23346539 PMCID: PMC3546288 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2012.30.4.197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2012] [Revised: 10/17/2012] [Accepted: 10/22/2012] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To analyze the outcomes of chemoradiotherapy for extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer patients who underwent R2 resection or bypass surgery and to identify prognostic factors affecting clinical outcomes, especially in terms of molecular biomarkers. Materials and Methods Medical records of 21 patients with EHBD cancer who underwent R2 resection or bypass surgery followed by chemoradiotherapy from May 2001 to June 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. All surgical specimens were re-evaluated by immunohistochemical staining using phosphorylated protein kinase B (pAKT), CD24, matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), survivin, and β-catenin antibodies. The relationship between clinical outcomes and immunohistochemical results was investigated. Results At a median follow-up of 20 months, the actuarial 2-year locoregional progression-free, distant metastasis-free and overall survival were 37%, 56%, and 54%, respectively. On univariate analysis using clinicopathologic factors, there was no significant prognostic factor. In the immunohistochemical staining, cytoplasmic staining, and nuclear staining of pAKT was positive in 10 and 6 patients, respectively. There were positive CD24 in 7 patients, MMP9 in 16 patients, survivin in 8 patients, and β-catenin in 3 patients. On univariate analysis, there was no significant value of immunohistochemical results for clinical outcomes. Conclusion There was no significant association between clinical outcomes of patients with EHBD cancer who received chemoradiotherapy after R2 resection or bypass surgery and pAKT, CD24, MMP9, survivin, and β-catenin. Future research is needed on a larger data set or with other molecular biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeon Kang Koh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Kim K, Chie EK, Jang JY, Kim SW, Han SW, Oh DY, Im SA, Kim TY, Bang YJ, Ha SW. Distant metastasis risk stratification for patients undergoing curative resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiation for extrahepatic bile duct cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84:81-87. [PMID: 22789492 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2011] [Revised: 10/11/2011] [Accepted: 10/25/2011] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the prognostic factors predicting distant metastasis in patients undergoing adjuvant chemoradiation for extrahepatic bile duct (EHBD) cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between January 1995 and August 2006, 166 patients with EHBD cancer underwent resection with curative intent, followed by adjuvant chemoradiation. There were 120 males and 46 females, and median age was 61 years (range, 34-86). Postoperative radiotherapy was delivered to tumor bed and regional lymph nodes (median dose, 40 Gy; range, 34-56 Gy). A total of 157 patients also received fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy as a radiosensitizer, and fluoropyrimidine-based maintenance chemotherapy was administered to 127 patients. Median follow-up duration was 29 months. RESULTS The treatment failed for 97 patients, and the major pattern of failure was distant metastasis (76 patients, 78.4%). The 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rate was 49.4%. The most common site of distant failure was the liver (n = 36). On multivariate analysis, hilar tumor, tumor size ≥ 2 cm, involved lymph node, and poorly differentiated tumor were associated with inferior distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.0348, 0.0754, 0.0009, and 0.0078, respectively), whereas T stage was not (p = 0.8081). When patients were divided into four groups based on these risk factors, the 5-year distant metastasis-free survival rates for patients with 0, 1, 2, and 3 risk factors were 86.4%, 59.9%, 32.5%, and 0%, respectively (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION Despite maintenance chemotherapy, distant metastasis was the major pattern of failure in patients undergoing adjuvant chemoradiation for EHBD cancer after resection with curative intent. Intensified chemotherapy is warranted to improve the treatment outcome, especially in those with multiple risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyubo Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Outcomes from combined chemoradiotherapy in unresectable and locally advanced resected cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastrointest Cancer 2012; 43:50-5. [PMID: 21049308 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-010-9213-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Whilst surgery is the only potentially curative treatment for cholangiocarcinoma, many patients are either unfit for major surgery or have unresectable disease. Patients who undergo attempted curative resective surgery often have involved resection margins. The role of radiotherapy in these settings has not been clarified and is often not considered because of fears of late complications, especially liver and gastrointestinal toxicity. We present our experience of treating cholangiocarcinoma, either unresectable or locally advanced, with conformal radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy, examining survival, toxicity, patterns of failure and details of radiotherapy and chemotherapy administered. METHODS Between 1995 and 2005, 20 patients, median age 60.5 years (range 45-78 years) with cholangiocarcinoma received radical conformal radiotherapy (median dose 46 Gy in 1.8-2.0 Gy fractions) with concurrent cisplatin/5-FU and sequential gemcitabine chemotherapy. RESULTS Overall median survival was 20.4 months, 2 year survival, 43% and relapse-free survival, 9.6 months. 19/20 patients (95%) have died. One patient remains alive with liver and bone metastases. First site of failure was local and within radiotherapy field in 9/20 (45%) patients. No patient required interruption of radiotherapy for radiation toxicity, and none experienced subsequent late liver toxicity. CONCLUSIONS The survival of this group of historically poor prognosis patients is encouraging. Durable local control was achieved in a majority of patients having chemoradiotherapy and toxicity was not severe. Although most patients still succumbed to disease, treatment delayed onset of progression. Conformal radiotherapy should be considered as an integral component in new investigative approaches to treatment in this rare cancer.
Collapse
|
47
|
Kelley RK, Hirose R, Venook AP. Can we cure cholangiocarcinoma with neoadjuvant chemoradiation and liver transplantation? Time for a multicenter trial. Liver Transpl 2012; 18:509-13. [PMID: 22389236 DOI: 10.1002/lt.23423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
48
|
Payne SJL, Stebbing J, Wilson P, Slater S. Outcomes in unresectable and locally advanced resected cholangiocarcinoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2011; 11:705-9. [PMID: 21554045 DOI: 10.1586/era.11.32] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
Patients with cholangiocarcinomas often present with unresectable disease, which is associated with a poor clinical outcome and survival. A number of palliative options are available to patients; the evaluated article presented experience from a single institution of treating cholangiocarcinoma, either unresectable or locally advanced, with conformal radiotherapy and concurrent chemotherapy. Patients who had received biliary radiation for cholangiocarcinoma were identified from the hospital database, and information on the patients sourced from notes and reports. In total, 20 patients with a diagnosis of biliary tract cancer were included and received radical conformal radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin/5-fluorouracil and sequential gemcitabine. The median overall survival was 20.4 months and the relapse-free survival was 9.6 months. Treatment failure within the radiotherapy field was recorded in 45% of patients; adverse events were minimal. This study adds to the retrospective data available regarding the management of patients with biliary tract carcinomas, and we have found in our own cohort of 45 patients that gemcitabine/platinum was a more effective combination than monotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J L Payne
- Department of Oncology, Barts and the London NHS Trust, Department of Medical Oncology, London, EC1A 7BE, UK
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Massabeau C, Marchand V, Zefkili S, Servois V, Campana F, Giraud P. Early experience of helical tomotherapy for hepatobiliary radiotherapy. Case Reports Hepatol 2011; 2011:545267. [PMID: 25954545 PMCID: PMC4411892 DOI: 10.1155/2011/545267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2011] [Accepted: 05/14/2011] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Helical tomotherapy (HT), an image-guided, intensity-modulated, radiation therapy technique, allows for precise targeting while sparing normal tissues. We retrospectively assessed the feasibility and tolerance of the hepatobiliary HT in 9 patients. A total dose of 54 to 60 Gy was prescribed (1.8 or 2 Gy per fraction) with concurrent capecitabine for 7 patients. There were 1 hepatocarcinoma, 3 cholangiocarcinoma, 4 liver metastatic patients, and 1 pancreatic adenocarcinoma. All but one patient received previous therapies (chemotherapy, liver radiofrequency, and/or surgery). The median doses delivered to the normal liver and to the right kidney were 15.7 Gy and 4.4 Gy, respectively, below the recommended limits for all patients. Most of the treatment-related adverse events were transient and mild in severity. With a median followup of 12 months, no significant late toxicity was noted. Our results suggested that HT could be safely incorporated into the multidisciplinary treatment of hepatobiliary or pancreatic malignant disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carole Massabeau
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, 31052 Toulouse, France
| | - Virginie Marchand
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Sofia Zefkili
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Vincent Servois
- Department of Radiology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - François Campana
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
| | - Philippe Giraud
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Medical Physics, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, European Georges Pompidou Hospital, 75015 Paris, Paris Descartes University, 75005 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bonet Beltrán M, Roth AD, Mentha G, Allal AS. Adjuvant radio-chemotherapy for extrahepatic biliary tract cancers. BMC Cancer 2011; 11:267. [PMID: 21702920 PMCID: PMC3141778 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2010] [Accepted: 06/24/2011] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extrahepatic biliary duct cancers (EBDC) are uncommon malignancies characterized by a poor prognosis with high rate of loco-regional recurrence. The purpose of the present study is to assess the feasibility and the potential impact of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in a series of patients treated in one institution. METHODS Twenty three patients with non-metastatic bile duct cancer treated surgically with curative intent (4 gallbladder, 7 ampullary and 12 cholangiocarcinoma) received 3D conformal external beam RT to a median total dose of 50.4 Gy. Concurrent chemotherapy based on 5-FU was delivered to 21 patients (91%). Surgical margins were negative in 11 patients (48%), narrow in 2 (9%), and microscopically involved in 8 (35%). Eleven patients (55%) had metastatic nodal involvement. The average follow-up time for all patients was 30 months (ranging from 3-98). RESULTS Acute gastrointestinal grade 2 toxicity (RTOG scale) was recorded in 2 patients (9%). Nausea or vomiting grade 1 and 2 was observed in 8 (35%) and 2 patients (9%) respectively. Only one patient developed a major late radiation-induced toxicity. The main pattern of recurrence was both loco-regional and distant (liver, peritoneum and/or lung). No difference was observed in loco-regional control according to the tumor location. The 5-year actuarial loco-regional control rate was 48.3% (67% and 30% for patients operated on with negative and positive/narrow/unknown margins respectively, p=0.04). The 5-year actuarial overall survival was of 35.9% for the entire group (61.4% in case of negative margins and 16.7% in case of positive/narrow/unknown margins, p=0.07). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative RT with 50-60 Gy is feasible with acceptable acute and late toxicities. The potential benefit observed in our series may support the use of adjuvant RT in patients with locally advanced disease. Prospective randomized trials are warranted to confirm definitively the role of RT in this tumor location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Bonet Beltrán
- Servei d'Oncologia Radioteràpica, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa, Institut Oncològic del Vallès (CST-HGC-CSPT), Ctra. Torrebonica s/n. 08227 Terrassa - Barcelona, Spain
- Radiation-Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland
| | - Arnaud D Roth
- Onco-Surgery and Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland
| | - Gilles Mentha
- Onco-Surgery and Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland
| | - Abdelkarim S Allal
- Radiation-Oncology, Geneva University Hospitals, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1211 Genève 14, Switzerland
- Radiation-Oncology, HFR-Fribourg, Chemin des Pensionnats 2-6, 1752 Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|