1
|
Chen S, Xu H, Chen X, Shen Q, Chen X, Zhang M, Li Z, Zhang Z, Hao H, Yu W, Fan Y, Zhou L, Zhang N, Zhang J, Yang X, Shen C, Li X. First-in-human Study of a Dual-modality Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen-targeted Probe for Preoperative Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging and Intraoperative Fluorescence Imaging in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2025; 87:717-727. [PMID: 40204598 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2025.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2025] [Revised: 03/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/18/2025] [Indexed: 04/11/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Accurately distinguishing between cancerous and noncancerous tissues during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) is a challenge that can increase the risk of residual disease. This study aimed to evaluate the safety, optimal dose and accuracy of a dual-modality prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted probe (68Ga-P3) for preoperative positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging and intraoperative fluorescence imaging in prostate cancer. METHODS AND SURGICAL PROCEDURE Each participant received an intravenous chemical dose of 68Ga-P3 (10, 20, and 40 μg/kg), with radioactivity of 3.7 MBq/kg. PET/CT imaging was conducted 30, 60, and 120 min after injection to evaluate its biodistribution and dosimetry. RARP was performed at 24 ± 6 h after injection, in the sensitive mode of Firefly fluorescence imaging. KEY FINDINGS AND LIMITATIONS Between May 2024 and July 2024, a total of 16 patients were included; 68Ga-P3 was well tolerated without any adverse events related to 68Ga-P3 administration or fluorescence imaging. At 2 h after administration, the median tumor maximum standardized uptake value was 5.3 (4.1-8.1). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 68Ga-P3 PET/CT for tumor localization were 79.1%, 90.4%, 81.5%, and 89.0%, respectively. The overall NPV, PPV, and accuracy of intraoperative fluorescence imaging were 100%, 43.8%, and 90.9%, respectively. Of overall false-positive sites, 88.9% (8/9) were confirmed as tumor adjacent to the surgical margin. A dose of 40 μg/kg resulted in the highest accuracy of 92.3%. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS In PSMA-targeted PET imaging and fluorescence-guided surgery, 68Ga-P3 is safe and feasible for use, offering a novel tool for the surgical management of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silu Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Hongchuang Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xueqi Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Qi Shen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Xu Chen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Zhihua Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Zhongyuan Zhang
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Han Hao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Yu
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Fan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Liqun Zhou
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Ning Zhang
- Translational Cancer Research Center, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China
| | - Jianhua Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| | - Xing Yang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Peking University People's Hospital, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| | - Cheng Shen
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Institute of Urology, Peking University, National Urological Cancer Center, Xicheng District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li F, Jiang Y, Wang X, Gao Y, Lo CS, Su S, Wu Z, Jiang B, Zhao Z, Lin S, Xie Y, Chen J, Guo Q, Dong Z, Zhu J. Titanium nitride meta-biosensors targeting extracellular vesicles for high-sensitivity prostate cancer detection. Biosens Bioelectron 2025; 277:117288. [PMID: 39985905 DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2025.117288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2025] [Revised: 02/16/2025] [Accepted: 02/18/2025] [Indexed: 02/24/2025]
Abstract
Disposable plasmonic metasurfaces with high biosensing performance are urgently sought for clinical label-free detection. Low-cost aluminum (Al) and titanium nitride (TiN) offer promising alternatives to noble metals for constructing these metasurfaces. However, Al suffers from limited chemical stability, and TiN exhibits weak plasmonic effects, both of which hinder their application in meta-biosensing. Here we integrate their complementary advantages and propose the TiN/Al meta-biosensors. They not only empower the unique near-field enhancement for sensing by TiN/Al hybrid plasmonic modes, but also construct a robust TiN armor against external wear, heat, moisture and corrosion during the bio-detection process. Compared to traditional gold-based counterparts, our meta-biosensors offer superior optical sensitivity at a much lower cost and with fewer pretreatment steps. The excellent biosensing performance facilitates the development of a high-throughput detection system for serum small extracellular vesicles (sEVs), aiding in the diagnosis and follow-up of prostate cancer. The sEVs meta-biosensing demonstrates a diagnostic sensitivity of 100% for significantly distinguishing early cancer, breaking through the conventional testing limitation. Moreover, it doubles the prediction accuracy of cancer recurrence risk following surgery. Our research highlights the potential for large-scale development of powerful meta-biosensors based on non-noble materials, opening up significant opportunities in cancer diagnosis and prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fajun Li
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China; Xiamen Dili-Chip Technology Co. Ltd., Xiamen, 361000, China; School of Electronic Science and Engineering, National Model Microelectronics College, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China
| | - Yuanyuan Jiang
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China
| | - Xuegang Wang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, China
| | - Yuan Gao
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China
| | - Ching Shu Lo
- School of Electronic Science and Engineering, National Model Microelectronics College, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China
| | - Shengdong Su
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China
| | - Zhilin Wu
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China
| | - Bingliang Jiang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, China
| | - Zhongjie Zhao
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, China
| | - Shaowei Lin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, China
| | - Yinong Xie
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China
| | - Junjie Chen
- Analysis and Measurement Center, School of Pharmaceutical Science, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361102, China
| | - Qiwei Guo
- Department of Central Laboratory, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fujian Key Clinical Specialty of Laboratory Medicine, Women and Children's Hospital, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361003, China
| | - Zhaogang Dong
- Quantum Innovation Centre, Agency for Science Technology and Research, 2 Fusionopolis Way, Innovis #08-03, Singapore, 138634, Republic of Singapore
| | - Jinfeng Zhu
- Institute of Electromagnetics and Acoustics and Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Wave Science and Detection Technology, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China; Xiamen Dili-Chip Technology Co. Ltd., Xiamen, 361000, China; School of Electronic Science and Engineering, National Model Microelectronics College, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361100, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hagman A, Lantz A, Grannas D, Carlsson S, Akre O, Olsson M, Egevad L, Höijer J, Wiklund P. Positive surgical margin and oncological outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in different Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment risk groups. BJU Int 2025. [PMID: 40275471 DOI: 10.1111/bju.16732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the impact of a positive surgical margin (PSM) in relation to the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) and additional treatment in different preoperative Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) risk groups after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Retrospective cohort study of 1039 patients subjected to RARP for prostate cancer at a single European institution. PSM was stratified by extent (focal extensive). The CAPRA score was used for risk group stratification. BCR was defined as a prostate-specific antigen level >0.2 ng/mL. Additional treatment was defined as salvage radiotherapy (sRT) and/or androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT). RESULTS In total 227 patients had a PSM (21.8%). When compared to a negative surgical margin, an extensive PSM was associated with an increased risk of BCR (hazard ratio [HR] 2.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.09-8.29; HR 3.76, 95% CI 2.33-6.06; HR 2.35, 95% CI 1.03-5.38) and sRT (HR 3.75, 95% CI 1.45-9.7; HR 4.57, 95% CI 2.47-8.43; HR 9.32, 95% CI 1.06-14.82) in the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively. In high-risk patients a focal PSM was associated with an increased risk of BCR (HR 5.79, 95% CI 1.62-20.65), sRT (HR 9.32, 95% CI 1.7-50.95) and ADT (HR 4.11, 95% CI 1.08-15.57) whereas in low- and intermediate-risk patients a modest effect on BCR but no significant effect on sRT or ADT was found. We found no significant interaction between CAPRA risk group and PSM (P = 0.25). CONCLUSIONS While an extensive PSM was associated with an increased risk of recurrence in all risk groups, a focal PSM was associated with additional treatment only among men with high-risk tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Hagman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Lantz
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - David Grannas
- Unit of Biostatistics, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Stefan Carlsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mats Olsson
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Höijer
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Health System, New York City, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Quarta L, Cannoletta D, Pellegrino F, Barletta F, Scuderi S, Mazzone E, Stabile A, Montorsi F, Gandaglia G, Briganti A. The Role of Robot-Assisted, Imaging-Guided Surgery in Prostate Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2025; 17:1401. [PMID: 40361328 PMCID: PMC12070902 DOI: 10.3390/cancers17091401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2025] [Revised: 04/19/2025] [Accepted: 04/21/2025] [Indexed: 05/15/2025] Open
Abstract
Emerging imaging-guided technologies, such as prostate-specific membrane antigen radioguided surgery (PSMA-RGS) and augmented reality (AR), could enhance the precision and efficacy of robot-assisted prostate cancer (PCa) surgical approaches, maximizing the surgeons' ability to remove all cancer sites and thus patients' outcomes. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) represents an imaging-guided technique that could enhance nodal staging accuracy by leveraging lymphatic mapping with tracers. PSMA-RGS uses radiolabeled tracers with the aim to improve intraoperative lymph node metastases (LNMs) detection. Several studies demonstrated its feasibility and safety, with promising accuracy in nodal staging during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and in recurrence setting during salvage lymph node dissection (sLND) in patients who experience biochemical recurrence (BCR) after primary treatment and have positive PSMA positron emission tomography (PET). Near-infrared PSMA tracers, such as OTL78 and IS-002, have shown potential in intraoperative fluorescence-guided surgery, improving positive surgical margins (PSMs) and LNMs identification. Finally, augmented reality (AR), which integrates preoperative imaging (e.g., multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [mpMRI] of the prostate and computed tomography [CT]) onto the surgical field, can provide a real-time visualization of anatomical structures through the creation of three-dimensional (3D) models. These technologies may assist surgeons during intraoperative procedures, thus optimizing the balance between oncological control and functional outcomes. However, challenges remain in standardizing these tools and assessing their impact on long-term PCa control. Overall, these advancements represent a paradigm shift toward personalized and precise surgical approaches, emphasizing the integration of innovative strategies to improve outcomes of PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonardo Quarta
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Donato Cannoletta
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Pellegrino
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Barletta
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Simone Scuderi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Elio Mazzone
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Armando Stabile
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology, Division of Oncology, Gianfranco Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, URI, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wu Y, Liu F, Ma S, Jing G, Yu Q, Yao L, Shao C, Chen W, Wang X. Enhanced precision in prostate surgery: determining key factors for rectal positive surgical margins through integrated imaging and clinical data analysis. Front Surg 2025; 12:1563344. [PMID: 40276312 PMCID: PMC12018467 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2025.1563344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2025] [Accepted: 03/24/2025] [Indexed: 04/26/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective This study investigates the risk factors associated with rectal positive surgical margins (RPSM) following radical prostatectomy and aims to develop a predictive model. Methods Clinical data from 198 patients undergoing radical prostatectomy at the Department of Urology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from June 2022 to June 2024 were analyzed. Patients were categorized into groups with and without RPSM. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses identified independent predictors of RPSM. Utilizing R software, we generated a column chart illustrating prostate cancer's RPSM incidence and constructed ROC curves with the area under the curve (AUC) to assess the discriminative performance and calibration of our model. Results Multivariate logistic regression identified clinical stage, PSA level, Gleason score, bilateral prostate infiltration, and PI-RADS as significant predictors of RPSM (all P < 0.05). Using these predictors, we developed a nomogram that achieved a C-index of 0.833(95% CI: 0.785-0.887) and an AUC of 0.755 (95% CI: 0.645-0.866). Conclusion The predictive model effectively forecasts the likelihood of RPSM following radical prostatectomy, offering valuable insights for personalized patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yufan Wu
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
- Department of Urology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, JiangSu, China
| | - Fei Liu
- Department of Urology, Kunshan Sixth People’s Hospital, Kunshan, JiangSu, China
| | - Shiyu Ma
- Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Guodong Jing
- Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiwei Yu
- Department of Urology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, JiangSu, China
| | - Linya Yao
- Department of Urology, Kunshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Kunshan, JiangSu, China
| | - Chengwei Shao
- Department of Radiology, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China
| | - Weiguo Chen
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xingbo Wang
- Department of Urology, Jiangsu Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, JiangSu, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Moraitis A, Kahl T, Kandziora J, Jentzen W, Kersting D, Püllen L, Reis H, Köllermann J, Kesch C, Krafft U, Hadaschik BA, Zaidi H, Herrmann K, Barbato F, Fendler WP, Darr C, Fragoso Costa P. Evaluation of Surgical Margins with Intraoperative PSMA PET/CT and Their Prognostic Value in Radical Prostatectomy. J Nucl Med 2025; 66:352-358. [PMID: 39915125 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.268719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 03/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Detection of positive resection margins in surgical procedures of high-risk prostate cancer is key for minimizing the risk of recurrence. This study aimed at evaluating the accuracy of functional tumor-volume segmentation in intraoperative ex vivo PET/CT for margin assessment in prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. Methods: Seven high-risk prostate cancer patients received [18F]PSMA-1007 before radical prostatectomy. After removal of the prostate gland, ex vivo imaging on the AURA 10 PET/CT system was performed, and functional tumor volume was segmented using 4 semiautomatic segmentation methods. Resection margins and volumes were compared with histopathology. Additionally, a supportive phantom study was conducted to assess segmentation accuracy at low radiopharmaceutical activity. Results: Clinically, 18 lesions were analyzed in intraoperative PET/CT. Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of margin detection were 83%, 100%, 100%, and 92%, respectively, using an iterative thresholding method. In 1 patient, a biochemical recurrence was observed within 1 y of prostate-specific antigen follow-up, and 1 patient underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. The remaining 5 patients were still undergoing prostate-specific antigen follow-up with no evidence of biochemical recurrence. On the basis of a phantom-deduced minimal segmentable activity concentration of approximately 2 kBq/mL, we propose an administered [18F]PSMA-1007 activity of at least 1.9 and 0.4 MBq/kg for preoperative and intraoperative injections, respectively. Conclusion: Intraoperative ex vivo PET/CT is a promising modality for intraoperative margin assessment. Prospective trials are needed to further investigate the value of specimen PET/CT-based radioguided surgery in high-risk prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandros Moraitis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Theresa Kahl
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jens Kandziora
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Walter Jentzen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Kersting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lukas Püllen
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Henning Reis
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany; and
| | - Claudia Kesch
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Krafft
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Boris A Hadaschik
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Habib Zaidi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Francesco Barbato
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Pedro Fragoso Costa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, West German Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Day E, Tzelves L, Dickinson L, Shaw G, Tandogdu Z. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of preoperative surgical planning in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy on trifecta outcomes. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2025; 77:25-32. [PMID: 40183180 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.25.06144-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2025]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical planning in robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) recommends the maximal use of function persevering techniques without compromising oncological outcomes. There is no consensus on how to define the optimal surgical approach. This review aims to collate available evidence on the impact of preoperative planning interventions on the trifecta of oncological, functional or operative outcomes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed using the terms ((prostatectomy) AND (robot*)) AND (plan*) OR (image*) OR (decision*) for articles published between January 2000 and January 2024. Prospective studies reporting patients undergoing RARP with a preoperative planning intervention, compared to no planning, to determine at least one of trifecta outcome were included. Results were synthesized in a narrative review with a metanalysis when two or more studies reported the same outcomes. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Eight studies, one RCT and seven non-randomised prospective comparative studies, including 1945 patients, applying clinical nomograms, MRI and histology review were included. The outcomes reported were positive surgical margins (PSM) (oncological) and nerves sparing rates (functional). No operative outcomes were reported. Metanalysis demonstrated that positive surgical margins (PSM) were reduced in both clinical nomogram (RR=0.56, 95% CI: 0.37-0.87, P=0.009; two studies 563 patients) and MRI (RR=0.72, 95% CI: 0.54-0.96, P=0.02; three studies, 801 patients) intervention groups. Additionally, metanalysis of all nerve-sparing cases demonstrated lower PSM rates in the intervention group (RR=0.65, 95% CI: 0.47-0.90, P=0.01; three studies, 823 patients). No significant changes were seen in nerve-sparing rates. CONCLUSIONS Preoperative surgical planning with nomograms and MRI has the potential to improve PSM rates without compromising nerve sparing. It is not possible to identify the optimal approach, but it is likely that the incorporation of biopsy and MRI information will lead to the best outcomes. Further studies using universally accepted standards of the trifecta outcomes are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Day
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Lazaros Tzelves
- Second Department of Urology, Sismanogleio Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
| | - Louise Dickinson
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Greg Shaw
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Zafer Tandogdu
- Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK -
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zeidan Z, Tran J, Hwang Y, Huynh LM, Nguyen MX, Huang E, Zhang W, Ahlering T. Impact of Surgical Margin Status and Tumor Volume on Mortality After Robotic Radical Prostatectomy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2025; 71:187-192. [PMID: 39845741 PMCID: PMC11751535 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Positive surgical margins (PSMs) following radical prostatectomy (RP) have been seen as inherently unfavorable. However, a large international multi-institutional study recently revealed that unifocal PSMs (UPSMs) had no impact on prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), whereas multifocal PSMs (MPSMs) did. Our aim was to assess the relative impact of PSMs versus percentage tumor volume (PTV) on PCSM. Methods We analyzed data for 1552 patients who underwent robot-assisted RP performed by a single surgeon between 2002 and 2018 at a tertiary referral center with up to 15-yr follow-up. Patients were divided into negative surgical margin (NSM), UPSM, and MPSM groups, with PTV stratification using a cutoff of 40%. The primary outcome was stepwise multivariate regression analysis of predictors of PCSM (pT stage, pathological Gleason grade group, PTV, UPSM, and MPSM). The secondary outcome was the risk of 15-yr PCSM via Kaplan-Meier analysis. Key findings and limitations The group with 40-100% PTV was older and presented with more advanced grade and stage. High PTV was significantly associated with greater risk of PSM, biochemical recurrence, PCSM, and overall mortality at 15 yr (p < 0.001). In addition to high stage and grade, MPSM predicted PCSM in multivariate analysis, but lost predictive significance when PTV was included. Limitations of the study include the retrospective nature and the single-center setting. Conclusions and clinical implications Our study further challenges the belief that MPSMs inherently have an adverse impact on PCSM. Instead, MPSMs appear to signify more aggressive underlying disease that predominantly drives oncological outcomes. We recommend considering PTV as a more reliable predictor of PCSM. While avoidance of PSMs remains a critical surgical principle, this goal in prostate cancer needs to be weighed against urinary and sexual function outcomes. Patient summary After surgery to remove the prostate in men with prostate cancer, samples from the edge of the prostate that are positive for tumor cells are called positive surgical margins (PSMs). Results from our study show that a PSM on its own is not necessarily an adverse factor. However, PSMs may be a sign of higher severity of prostate cancer. We found that men with a high tumor volume have a higher risk of dying from their prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zaki Zeidan
- Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Joshua Tran
- Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Yeagyeong Hwang
- Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | | | - Mai Xuan Nguyen
- Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Erica Huang
- Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Whitney Zhang
- Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Thomas Ahlering
- Department of Urology, University of California-Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Oguic R, Grskovic A, Spanjol J, Mikolasevic I, Djordjevic G. CD44 Immunohistochemical Expression in Central and Peripheral Parts of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: An Institutional Study. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:2032. [PMID: 39768912 PMCID: PMC11728140 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60122032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2024] [Revised: 11/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Prostate cancer is one of the most commonly diagnosed cancers in the male population and the fifth leading cause of cancer death worldwide in men as of 2022. One of the potential biomarkers that can predict the progression of the disease is the transmembrane adhesion molecule CD44s. The aims of this study were to determine the expression of CD44s in prostate cancer in the central tumor mass and in the tumor periphery of the disease and to compare it with the clinicopathological parameters (PSA, Gleason score, surgical margins, and biochemical recurrence of the disease) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy. Materials and Methods: The research was randomized retrospectively during the period from 2001 to 2006. Tissue microarrays of 121 archival acinar prostate carcinoma samples were immunohistochemically evaluated for CD44s expression. The immunoexpression was determined semiquantitatively, taking into account the percentage (0 (0-5%), 1 (6-24%), 2 (26-75%), and 3 (76-100%) and intensity of the membranous staining of the tumor cells (0 absent; 1 weak at 400×; 2 intermediates at 100×; 3 strong at 40×) and calculated to obtain a final score (0-3 were regarded as negative; 4-6 were regarded as positive). Results: For statistical purposes, we divided the tumors into two categories: Gleason grade group 1 makes up 80.7% and grade group 2, which includes all the remaining Gleason grade groups (out of 2-5), accounts for 19.3% of the tumors. Grade group 1 had the highest incidence of score 4 (positive expression). There were statistically significantly more positive expressions in those tumors with negative prostatectomy margins (chi square: p = 0.001; Cramer V: 0.319). There was no correlation between CD44s expression and biochemical recurrence (p = 0.218), nor with the preoperative PSA values (p = 0.165). In the grade group 1 tumors, the CD44s immunoexpression and status of prostatectomy margin were statistically significantly related with negative margins (p = 0.028). An analysis of the expression of CD44s according to the localization in the central part of the tumor mass and on the periphery of the cancer in the group of tumors with a positive margin did not show a significant correlation because the sample was too small. Descriptively, it can be noted that the expression on the periphery was higher, and the central/peripheral expression ratio was higher in favor of the periphery. Conclusions: Our results provide insight into the possible value of CD44s expression for predicting the behavior of prostate tumors and the justification of therapy after a prostatectomy. Also hypothetically, they indicate a protective role of CD44s in a group of well-differentiated tumors at the periphery of the tumor mass. Therefore, it is useful to study the CD44s molecule further in this sense.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Romano Oguic
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (R.O.); (A.G.); (J.S.)
| | - Antun Grskovic
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (R.O.); (A.G.); (J.S.)
| | - Josip Spanjol
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia; (R.O.); (A.G.); (J.S.)
| | - Ivana Mikolasevic
- Clinical Institute of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital Centre Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia;
| | - Gordana Djordjevic
- Department of Pathology and Cytology, University Hospital Center Rijeka, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kroon LJ, Remmers S, Busstra MB, Gan M, Klaver S, Rietbergen JBW, van der Slot MA, Hollemans E, Kweldam CF, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, van Leenders GJLH. Centralized prostatectomy with intraoperative NeuroSAFE margin assessment improves surgical margin control. Histopathology 2024; 85:760-768. [PMID: 39108215 DOI: 10.1111/his.15291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
AIMS To investigate the surgical margin status in patients with prostate cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with intraoperative neurovascular structure-adjacent frozen-section analysis (NeuroSAFE) and evaluate differences compared to patients who underwent radical prostatectomy without NeuroSAFE. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between September 2018 and January 2021, 962 patients underwent centralized RARP with NeuroSAFE. A secondary resection was performed in case of a positive surgical margin (PSM) on intraoperative frozen section (IFS) analysis to convert a PSM into a negative surgical margin (NSM). A retrospective cohort consisted of 835 patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy in a tertiary centre without NeuroSAFE between January 2000 and December 2017. We performed multivariable logistic regression to evaluate differences in risk of PSM between cohorts after controlling for clinicopathological variables. RESULTS Patients operated with NeuroSAFE in the centralized clinic had 29% PSM at a definitive pathological RP examination. The median cumulative length of definitive PSM was 1.1 mm (interquartile range: 0.4-3.8). Among 275 men with PSM, 136 (49%) had a cumulative length ≤1 mm and 198 (72%) ≤3 mm. After controlling for PSA, Grade group, cribriform pattern, pT-stage, and pN-stage, patients treated in the centralized clinic with NeuroSAFE had significantly lower odds on PSM (odds ratio [OR]: 0.70, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.56-0.88; P = 0.002), PSM length >1 mm (OR: 0.14, 95% CI: 0.09-0.22; P < 0.001), and >3 mm (OR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.14-0.30; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION This study provides a detailed overview of surgical margin status in a centralized RP NeuroSAFE cohort. Centralization with NeuroSAFE was associated with lower PSM rates and significantly shorter PSM cumulative lengths, indicating improved control of surgical margin status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa J Kroon
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Anser Prostate Clinic, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Remmers
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Melanie Gan
- Anser Prostate Clinic, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Margaretha A van der Slot
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- Anser Prostate Clinic, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Eva Hollemans
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Chris H Bangma
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique J Roobol
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert J L H van Leenders
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scarcia M, Filomena GB, Moretto S, Marino F, Cotrufo S, Francocci A, Maselli FP, Cardo G, Pagliarulo G, Rizzo P, Russo P, Di Dio M, Alba S, Calbi R, Romano M, Zazzara M, Ludovico GM. Extraperitoneal Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy with the Hugo™ RAS System: Initial Experience at a High-Volume Robotic Centre. J Clin Med 2024; 13:5916. [PMID: 39407976 PMCID: PMC11477504 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13195916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2024] [Revised: 09/23/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/20/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: The Hugo™ Robotic-Assisted Surgery (Hugo™ RAS) system represents a novel advancement in robotic surgical technology. Despite this, there remains a scarcity of data regarding extraperitoneal robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (eRARP) using this system. Methods: We conducted a prospective study at Ospedale Regionale "F. Miulli" from June 2023 to January 2024, enrolling consecutive patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing eRARP ± lymph node dissection. All procedures employed a modular four-arm setup performed by two young surgeons with limited prior robotic surgery experience. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of eRARP using the Hugo™ RAS system, reporting comprehensive preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative outcomes in the largest reported cohort to date. Results: A total of 50 cases were analyzed, with a mean patient age of 65.76 (±5.57) years. The median operative time was 275 min (Q1-Q3 150-345), and the console time was 240 min (Q1-Q3 150-300). The docking time averaged 10 min (Q1-Q3 6-20). There were no intraoperative complications recorded. Two major complications occurred within the first 90 days. At the 3-month mark, 36 patients (72%) achieved undetectable PSA levels (<0.1 ng/mL). Social continence was achieved by 66% of patients, while 40% maintained erectile function. Conclusions: eRARP utilizing the Hugo™ RAS system demonstrated effectiveness and safety in our study cohort. However, more extensive studies with larger cohorts and longer follow-up periods are necessary to thoroughly evaluate long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcello Scarcia
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Giovanni Battista Filomena
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Stefano Moretto
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
- Department of Urology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Institute IRCCS, Rozzano, 20089 Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Marino
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Simone Cotrufo
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Alessandra Francocci
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Francesco Paolo Maselli
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Giuseppe Cardo
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Giovanni Pagliarulo
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Pierluigi Rizzo
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Pierluigi Russo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy;
| | - Stefano Alba
- Department of Urology, Romolo Hospital, 88821 Rocca di Neto, KR, Italy;
| | - Roberto Calbi
- Department of Radiology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy;
| | - Michele Romano
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Michele Zazzara
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| | - Giuseppe Mario Ludovico
- Department of Urology, “F. Miulli” General Hospital, 70021 Acquaviva delle Fonti, BA, Italy; (M.S.); (S.M.); (S.C.); (A.F.); (F.P.M.); (G.C.); (G.P.); (P.R.); (M.R.); (M.Z.); (G.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bozorgmehr CK, Wang J, Gross JT, Pickersgill NA, Vetter JM, Ippolito JE, Kim EH. Preoperative prostate magnetic resonance imaging does not impact surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Indian J Urol 2024; 40:266-271. [PMID: 39555429 PMCID: PMC11567587 DOI: 10.4103/iju.iju_115_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2024] [Revised: 07/18/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 11/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective We reviewed our institutional experience of radical prostatectomy with and without preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) to assess the impact of preoperative prostate mpMRI on surgical outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Methods We identified patients at our institution who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa) between January 2012 and December 2017 (n = 1044). Using propensity scoring analysis, patients who underwent preoperative mpMRI (n = 285) were matched 1:1 to patients who did not receive preoperative mpMRI (n = 285). Multivariable regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), lymph node yield, rates of complications within 30 days, and positive surgical margin (PSM). Results There were no significant differences in operative time, EBL, PSM, lymph node yield, or complication rates between the two cohorts. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that preoperative mpMRI was not predictive of the measured perioperative outcomes. Significant comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥3) was the sole predictor of perioperative complications (P = 0.015). Increasing biopsy Gleason score predicted increased lymph node yield (P < 0.001). The probability of PSM was associated with increasing preoperative prostate-specific antigen (odds ratio 1.036, P = 0.009). Body mass index was a predictor of operative time (P = 0.016) and EBL (P = 0.001). Conclusions Although preoperative mpMRI has an important role in the diagnosis and staging of PCa, it does not impact perioperative radical prostatectomy outcomes. Our findings do not support the routine use of preoperative mpMRI for surgical planning in patients already diagnosed with clinically localized PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher K. Bozorgmehr
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Johnny Wang
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - James T. Gross
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Nicholas A. Pickersgill
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joel M. Vetter
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Joseph E. Ippolito
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Eric H. Kim
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA
- Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vargo EH, Vetter JM, Figenshau RS, Kim EH. A Hybrid Approach to Hood-Sparing Robotic Prostatectomy to Maximize Functional Outcomes and Maintain Early Oncologic Efficacy. J Endourol 2024; 38:997-1003. [PMID: 38877796 DOI: 10.1089/end.2024.0203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: We detail our approach and experience with a hybrid version of the endopelvic hood-sparing (HS) robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) using the da Vinci robotic platform. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 200 patients who underwent RARP by a single surgeon. Patients were propensity-matched into three cohorts depending on biopsy and prostatectomy Gleason Grade Groups: traditional retropubic (RP) (n = 80), retzius-sparing (RS) (n = 40), and HS (n = 80). Patient characteristics and oncologic and functional outcomes were examined. Zero pads per day defined return of continence. Erections suitable for penetrative intercourse with/without medications defined return of sexual function. Results: Patient characteristics were similar between cohorts excluding prostate-specific antigen levels (p = 0.014), which were significantly lower in the RS cohort (7.1 ± 5.3 ng/mL) compared with RP (9.2 ± 9.3 ng/mL) and HS (8.8 ± 8.9 ng/mL). Clinically significant positive margin rates were significantly higher (p = 0.046) in the RS cohort (32.5%) compared with RP (17.5%) and HS (13.9%). Biochemical recurrence and metastasis rates were similar between all cohorts. Median time to continence was significantly lower for RS and HS-RARP (p < 0.001) compared with RP-RARP at 1.3, 1.6, and 5.4 months, respectively. Median time to return of sexual function was significantly lower for RS and HS-RARP (p < 0.001) compared with RP-RARP at 4.0, 7.7, and 15.1 months, respectively. Conclusions: Our hybrid HS-RARP approach provides functional outcomes similar to RS-RARP with the early oncologic control of traditional RP-RARP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan H Vargo
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Joel M Vetter
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - R Sherburne Figenshau
- Division of Urologic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Eric H Kim
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine; Department of Physiology and Cell Biology, University of Nevada Reno School of Medicine, Reno, Nevada, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Martini A, Wever L, Soeterik TFW, Rakauskas A, Fankhauser CD, Grogg JB, Checcucci E, Amparore D, Haiquel L, Rodriguez-Sanchez L, Ploussard G, Qiang P, Affentranger A, Marquis A, Marra G, Ettala O, Zattoni F, Falagario UG, De Angelis M, Kesch C, Apfelbeck M, Al-Hammouri T, Kretschmer A, Kasivisvanathan V, Preisser F, Lefebvre E, Olivier J, Radtke JP, Carrieri G, Moro FD, Boström P, Jambor I, Gontero P, Chiu PK, John H, Macek P, Porpiglia F, Hermanns T, van den Bergh RCN, van Basten JPA, Gandaglia G, Valerio M. An updated model for predicting side-specific extraprostatic extension in the era of MRI-targeted biopsy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:520-524. [PMID: 38182804 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00776-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Revised: 11/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/01/2023] [Indexed: 01/07/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate prediction of extraprostatic extension (EPE) is pivotal for surgical planning. Herein, we aimed to provide an updated model for predicting EPE among patients diagnosed with MRI-targeted biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed a multi-institutional dataset of men with clinically localized prostate cancer diagnosed by MRI-targeted biopsy and subsequently underwent prostatectomy. To develop a side-specific predictive model, we considered the prostatic lobes separately. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was fitted to predict side-specific EPE. The decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the net clinical benefit. Finally, a regression tree was employed to identify three risk categories to assist urologists in selecting candidates for nerve-sparing, incremental nerve sparing and non-nerve-sparing surgery. RESULTS Overall, data from 3169 hemi-prostates were considered, after the exclusion of prostatic lobes with no biopsy-documented tumor. EPE was present on final pathology in 1,094 (34%) cases. Among these, MRI was able to predict EPE correctly in 568 (52%) cases. A model including PSA, maximum diameter of the index lesion, presence of EPE on MRI, highest ISUP grade in the ipsilateral hemi-prostate, and percentage of positive cores in the ipsilateral hemi-prostate achieved an AUC of 81% after internal validation. Overall, 566, 577, and 2,026 observations fell in the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups for EPE, as identified by the regression tree. The EPE rate across the groups was: 5.1%, 14.9%, and 48% for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk group, respectively. CONCLUSION In this study we present an update of the first side-specific MRI-based nomogram for the prediction of extraprostatic extension together with updated risk categories to help clinicians in deciding on the best approach to nerve-preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, La Croix du Sud Hospital, Toulouse, France.
| | - Lieke Wever
- St. Antonius ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arnas Rakauskas
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | | | - Josias Bastian Grogg
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Luciano Haiquel
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Peng Qiang
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | | | - Alessandro Marquis
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Mario De Angelis
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Tarek Al-Hammouri
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Department of Urology, University College London and University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | | | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Urology Unit, Academical Medical Centre Hospital, Udine, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology, Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Peter Boström
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Ivan Jambor
- Department of Urology, Turku University, Turku, Finland
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Peter K Chiu
- SH Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Petr Macek
- Department of Urology, Institut Mutualiste Montsouris, Paris, France
| | | | - Thomas Hermanns
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Jean-Paul A van Basten
- St. Antonius ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Geneva University Hospital, Geneva, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
de Roode LM, de Boer LL, Da Silva Guimaraes M, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG, Dashtbozorg B, Ruers TJ. Feasibility of Diffuse Reflection Spectroscopy for Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Prostatectomy. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 67:62-68. [PMID: 39229364 PMCID: PMC11369370 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2024.07.112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 09/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objective A positive surgical margin (PSM) occurs in up to 32% of patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (DRS), which measures tissue composition according to its optical properties, can potentially be used for real-time PSM detection during RARP. Our objective was to assess the feasibility of DRS in distinguishing prostate cancer from benign tissue in RARP specimens. Methods In a single-center prospective study, DRS measurements were taken ex vivo for RARP specimens from 59 patients with biopsy-proven prostate carcinoma. Discriminating features from the DRS spectra were used to create a machine learning-based classification algorithm. The data were split patient-wise into training (70%) and testing (30%) sets, with ten iterations to ensure algorithm robustness. The average sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) from ten classification iterations were calculated. Key findings and limitations We collected 542 DRS measurements, of which 53% were tumor and 47% were healthy-tissue measurements. Twenty discriminating features from the DRS spectra were used as the input for a support vector machine model. This model achieved average sensitivity of 89%, specificity of 82%, accuracy of 85%, and AUC of 0.91 for the test set. Limitations include the binary label input for classification. Conclusions and clinical implications DRS can potentially discriminate prostate cancer from benign tissue. Before implementing the technique in clinical practice, further research is needed to assess its performance on heterogeneous tissue volumes and measurements from the prostate surface. Patient summary We looked at the ability of a technique called diffuse reflectance spectroscopy to guide surgeons in discriminating prostate cancer tissue from benign prostate tissue in real time during prostate cancer surgery. Our study showed promising results in an experimental setting. Future research will focus on bringing this technique to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte M. de Roode
- Department of Nanobiophysics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Image-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne L. de Boer
- Image-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marcos Da Silva Guimaraes
- Molecular Pathology & Biobanking, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G. van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Behdad Dashtbozorg
- Image-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo J.M. Ruers
- Department of Nanobiophysics, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Image-Guided Surgery, Department of Surgery, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Xu L, Peng Q, Zhang G, Zhang D, Zhang J, Zhang X, Bai X, Chen L, Guo E, Xiao Y, Jin Z, Sun H. Development of preoperative nomograms to predict the risk of overall and multifocal positive surgical margin after radical prostatectomy. Cancer Imaging 2024; 24:104. [PMID: 39118144 PMCID: PMC11312749 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-024-00749-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop preoperative nomograms using risk factors based on clinicopathological and MRI for predicting the risk of positive surgical margin (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS This study retrospectively enrolled patients who underwent prostate MRI before RP at our center between January 2015 and November 2022. Preoperative clinicopathological factors and MRI-based features were recorded for analysis. The presence of PSM (overall PSM [oPSM]) at pathology and the multifocality of PSM (mPSM) were evaluated. LASSO regression was employed for variable selection. For the final model construction, logistic regression was applied combined with the bootstrap method for internal verification. The risk probability of individual patients was visualized using a nomogram. RESULTS In all, 259 patients were included in this study, and 76 (29.3%) patients had PSM, including 40 patients with mPSM. Final multivariate logistic regression revealed that the independent risk factors for oPSM were tumor diameter, frank extraprostatic extension, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the nomogram for oPSM reached an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.717 in development and 0.716 in internal verification. The independent risk factors for mPSM included the percentage of positive cores, tumor diameter, apex depth, and annual surgery volume (all p < 0.05), and the AUC of the nomogram for mPSM was 0.790 in both development and internal verification. The calibration curve analysis showed that these nomograms were well-calibrated for both oPSM and mPSM. CONCLUSIONS The proposed nomograms showed good performance and were feasible in predicting oPSM and mPSM, which might facilitate more individualized management of prostate cancer patients who are candidates for surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lili Xu
- Department of Radiology, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 1 East Banshan Road, Gongshu District, Hangzhou, 310022, China
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Qianyu Peng
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Gumuyang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Daming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xin Bai
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Erjia Guo
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Yu Xiao
- Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zhengyu Jin
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
- National Center for Quality Control of Radiology, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Hao Sun
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
- National Center for Quality Control of Radiology, No.1 Shuaifuyuan, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bravi CA, Dell'Oglio P, Piazza P, Scarcella S, Bianchi L, Falagario U, Turri F, Andras I, Di Maida F, De Groote R, Piramide F, Moschovas MC, Suardi N, Terrone C, Carrieri G, Patel V, Autorino R, Porpiglia F, Vickers A, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Mottrie A, Larcher A. Positive Surgical Margins After Anterior Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Assessing the Learning Curve in a Multi-institutional Collaboration. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:821-828. [PMID: 38036328 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Revised: 10/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 12/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The learning curve for robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) remains controversial, with prior studies showing that, in contrast with evidence on open and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy, biochemical recurrence rates of experienced versus inexperienced surgeons did not differ. OBJECTIVE To characterize the learning curve for positive surgical margins (PSMs) after RARP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS We analyzed the data of 13 090 patients with prostate cancer undergoing RARP by one of 74 surgeons from ten institutions in Europe and North America between 2003 and 2022. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Multivariable models were used to assess the association between surgeon experience at the time of each patient's operation and PSMs after surgery, with adjustment for preoperative prostate-specific antigen level, grade, stage, and year of surgery. Surgeon experience was coded as the number of robotic radical prostatectomies done by the surgeon before the index patient's operation. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 2838 (22%) men had PSMs on final pathology. After adjusting for case mix, we found a significant, nonlinear association between surgical experience and probability of PSMs after surgery, with a lower risk of PSMs for greater surgeon experience (p < 0.0001). The probabilities of PSMs for a patient treated by a surgeon with ten, 250, 500, and 2000 prior robotic procedures were 26%, 21%, 18%, and 14%, respectively (absolute risk difference between ten and 2000 procedures: 11%; 95% confidence interval: 9%, 14%). Similar results were found after stratifying patients according to extracapsular extension at final pathology. Results were also unaltered after excluding surgeons who had moved between institutions. CONCLUSIONS While we characterized the learning curve for PSMs after RARP, the relative contribution of surgical learning to the achievement of optimal outcomes remains controversial. Future investigations should focus on what experienced surgeons do to avoid positive margins and should explore the relationship between learning, margin rate, and biochemical recurrence. Understanding what margins affect recurrence and whether these margins are trainable or a result of other factors may shed light on where to focus future efforts in surgical education. PATIENT SUMMARY In patients receiving robotic radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer, we characterized the learning curve for positive margins. The risk of surgical margins decreased progressively with increasing experience, and plateaued around the 500th procedure. Understanding what margins affect recurrence and whether these margins are trainable or a result of other factors has implications for surgeons and patients, and it may shed light on where to focus future efforts in surgical education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo A Bravi
- Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Paolo Dell'Oglio
- Department of Urology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Pietro Piazza
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simone Scarcella
- Division of Urology, United Hospital of Ancona, School of Medicine Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Marche, Italy; Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bianchi
- Division of Urology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ugo Falagario
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Filippo Turri
- Department of Urology, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Iulia Andras
- Department of Urology, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Ruben De Groote
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Federico Piramide
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Nazareno Suardi
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Urology, Ospedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Carlo Terrone
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carrieri
- Urology and Renal Transplantation Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | - Vipul Patel
- AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Celebration, FL, USA
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- School of Medicine, Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Andrew Vickers
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Alessandro Larcher
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pellegrino F, Falagario UG, Knipper S, Martini A, Akre O, Egevad L, Aly M, Moschovas MC, Bravi CA, Tran J, Heiniger Y, von Kempis A, Schaffar R, Carrieri G, Briganti A, Montorsi F, Rochat CH, Mottrie A, Ahlering TE, John H, Patel V, Graefen M, Wiklund P. Assessing the Impact of Positive Surgical Margins on Mortality in Patients Who Underwent Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: 20 Years' Report from the EAU Robotic Urology Section Scientific Working Group. Eur Urol Oncol 2024; 7:888-896. [PMID: 38155061 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2023.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2023] [Revised: 10/25/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positive surgical margins (PSMs) are frequent in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP). The impact of PSMs on cancer-specific (CSM) and overall (OM) mortality has not yet been proved definitively. OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether the presence and the features of PSMs were associated with CSM and OM in patients who underwent robotic-assisted RP. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A cohort of 8141 patients underwent robotic-assisted RP with >10 yr of follow-up. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Cox multivariable analyses assessed the impact of margin status (positive vs negative) and PSM features (negative vs <3 mm vs >3 mm vs multifocal) on the risk of CSM, OM, and biochemical recurrence (BCR) after adjusting for potential confounders. We repeated our analyses after stratifying patients according to clinical (Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment [CAPRA] categories) and pathological characteristics (adverse: pT 3-4 and/or grade group [GG] 4-5 and/or pN1 and/or prostate-specific antigen [PSA] persistence). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS PSMs were found in 1348 patients (16%). Among these, 48 (3.6%) patients had multifocal PSMs. Overall, 1550 men experienced BCR and 898 men died, including 130 for prostate cancer. At Cox multivariable analyses, PSMs were associated with CSM in patients with adverse clinical (Intermediate risk: hazard ratio [HR]: 1.71, p = 0.048; high risk: HR: 2.20, p = 0.009) and pathological (HR: 1.79, p = 0.005) characteristics. Only multifocal PSMs were associated with CSM and OM in the whole population (HR for CSM: 4.68, p < 0.001; HR for OM: 1.82, p = 0.037) and in patients with adverse clinical (intermediate risk: HR for CSM: 7.26, p = 0.006; high risk: HR for CSM: 9.26, p < 0.001; HR for OM: 2.97, p = 0.006) and pathological (HR for CSM: 9.50, p < 0.001; HR for OM: 2.59, p = 0.001) characteristics. Potential limitations include a selection bias and a lack of information on the Gleason score at PSM location. CONCLUSIONS We did not find an association between unifocal PSMs and mortality. Conversely, our results underscore the importance of avoiding multifocal PSMs in patients with adverse clinical (intermediate- and high-risk CAPRA score) and pathological (GG ≥4, pT ≥3, pN1, or PSA persistence) characteristics, to enhance overall survival and reduce CSM. PATIENT SUMMARY In this study, we evaluated whether the presence and the characteristics of positive surgical margins were associated with mortality in patients who underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. We found that the presence of positive surgical margins, particularly multifocal margins, was associated with mortality only in patients with adverse clinical and pathological characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Pellegrino
- Department of Pelvic Cancer, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Sweden; Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Urology, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Olof Akre
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lars Egevad
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Markus Aly
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Departments of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marcio Covas Moschovas
- AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Orlando, FL, USA; University of Central Florida (UCF), Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Carlo Andrea Bravi
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Urology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Joshua Tran
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Yasmin Heiniger
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | | | - Robin Schaffar
- Department of Urology, Clinique Générale Beaulieu, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Alberto Briganti
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Unit of Urology/Division of Oncology, Soldera Prostate Cancer Lab, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Alexandre Mottrie
- Department of Urology, Onze-Lieve-Vrouwziekenhuis Hospital, Aalst, Belgium; ORSI Academy, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Thomas E Ahlering
- Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine Medical Center, Orange, CA, USA
| | - Hubert John
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Vipul Patel
- AdventHealth Global Robotics Institute, Orlando, FL, USA; University of Central Florida (UCF), Orlando, FL, USA
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Peter Wiklund
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Totaro A, Scarciglia E, Marino F, Campetella M, Gandi C, Ragonese M, Bientinesi R, Palermo G, Bizzarri FP, Cretì A, Presutti S, Russo A, Aceto P, Bassi P, Pierconti F, Racioppi M, Sacco E. Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy Performed with the Novel Surgical Robotic Platform Hugo™ RAS: Monocentric First Series of 132 Cases Reporting Surgical, and Early Functional and Oncological Outcomes at a Tertiary Referral Robotic Center. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1602. [PMID: 38672683 PMCID: PMC11049006 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2024] [Revised: 04/07/2024] [Accepted: 04/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted surgery is the gold standard for performing radical prostatectomy (RARP), with new robotic devices such as HugoTM RAS gaining prominence worldwide. OBJECTIVE We report the surgical, perioperative, and early postoperative outcomes of RARP using HugoTM RAS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between April 2022 and October 2023, we performed 132 procedures using the Montsouris technique with a four-robotic-arm configuration in patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (PCa). OUTCOME MEASURES We collected intraoperative and perioperative data during hospitalization, along with follow-up data at predefined postoperative intervals of 3 and 6 months. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Lymphadenectomy was performed in 25 procedures, with a bilateral nerve-sparing technique in 33 and a monolateral nerve-sparing technique in 33 cases. The mean total surgery time was 242 (±57) min, the mean console time was 124 (±48) min, and the mean docking time was 10 (±2) min. We identified 17 system errors related to robotic arm failures, 9 robotic instrument breakdowns, and 8 significant conflicts between robotic arms. One post-operative complication was classified as Clavien-Dindo 3b. None of the adverse events, whether singular or combined, increased the operative time. Positive margins (pR1) were found in 54 (40.9%) histological specimens, 37 (28.0%) of which were clinically significant. At 3 and 6 months post-surgery, the PSA levels were undetectable in 94.6% and 92.1% of patients, respectively. Social urinary continence was regained in 86% after 6 months. Limitations of our study include its observational monocentric case-series design and the short follow-up data for functional and oncological outcomes. CONCLUSIONS Our initial experience highlights the reliability of the HugoTM RAS system in performing RARP. Additionally, we also list problems and solutions found in our daily work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Totaro
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Eros Scarciglia
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Marino
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Campetella
- Department of Urology, Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola Hospital, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Gandi
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Ragonese
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bientinesi
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Palermo
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pio Bizzarri
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Cretì
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Simona Presutti
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Russo
- Department of Anesthesia, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Paola Aceto
- Department of Anesthesia, Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Pierfrancesco Bassi
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Pierconti
- Department of Pathological Anatomy, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Racioppi
- Department of Urology, Agostino Gemelli Hospital Foundation—IRCCS, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| | - Emilio Sacco
- Department of Urology, Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola Hospital, Catholic University Medical School, 00167 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
John A, Lim A, Catterwell R, Selth L, O'Callaghan M. Length of positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: Does size matter? - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:673-680. [PMID: 36859711 PMCID: PMC10638086 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00654-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The prognostic capacity of positive surgical margins (PSM) for biochemical recurrence (BCR) is unclear, with inconsistent findings across published studies. We aimed to systematically review and perform a meta-analysis exploring the impact of Positive surgical margin length on biochemical recurrence in men after radical prostatectomy. METHODS A search was conducted using the MEDLINE, Scopus, Embase and Cochrane databases according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, and the protocol was registered in advance (PROSPERO: CRD42020195908). This meta-analysis included 16 studies with BCR as the primary outcome measure. RESULTS Studies used various dichotomised thresholds for PSM length. A subgroup meta-analysis was performed using the reported multivariable hazard ratio (Continuous, 3, and 1 mm PSM length). PSM length (continuous) was independently associated with an increased risk of BCR (7 studies, HR 1.04 (CI 1.02-1.05), I2 = 8% p < 0.05). PSM length greater than 3 mm conferred a higher risk of BCR compared to less than 3 mm (4 studies, HR 1.99 (1.54-2.58) I2 = 0%, p < 0.05). There was also an increased risk of BCR associated with PSM length of less than 1 mm compared to negative surgical margins (3 studies, HR 1.46 (1.05-2.04), I2 = 0%, P = 0.02). CONCLUSION PSM length is independently prognostic for BCR after radical prostatectomy. Further long-term studies are needed to estimate the impact on systemic progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Athul John
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical, Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
- Urology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Alicia Lim
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical, Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Urology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Rick Catterwell
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical, Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Urology, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Luke Selth
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical, Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI) and Freemasons Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael O'Callaghan
- Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide Faculty of Health and Medical, Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute (FHMRI) and Freemasons Centre for Male Health and Wellbeing, College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Urology, Southern Adelaide Local Health Network, South Australia Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Peng Q, Xu L, Zhang G, Zhang D, Zhang J, Zhang X, Bai X, Chen L, Jin Z, Sun H. Effect of preoperative PI-RADS assessment on pathological outcomes in patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:113. [PMID: 38008745 PMCID: PMC10680237 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00619-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effect of preoperative MRI with standardized Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) assessment on pathological outcomes in prostate cancer (PCa) patients who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP). PATIENTS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study included patients who had undergone prostate MRI and subsequent RP for PCa between January 2017 and December 2022. The patients were divided into the PI-RADS group and the non-PI-RADS group according to evaluation scheme of presurgery MRI. The preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were retrieved and analyzed. The pathological outcomes included pathological T stage (pT2 vs. pT3-4) and positive surgical margins (PSMs). Patients were further stratified according to statistically significant preoperative variables to assess the difference in pathological outcomes. A propensity score matching based on the above preoperative characteristics was additionally performed. RESULTS A total of 380 patients were included in this study, with 201 patients in the PI-RADS group and 179 in the non-PI-RADS group. The two groups had similar preoperative characteristics, except for clinical T stage (cT). As for pathological outcomes, the PI-RADS group showed a significantly lower percentage of pT3-4 (21.4% vs. 48.0%, p < 0.001), a lower percentage of PSMs (31.3% vs. 40.9%, p = 0.055), and a higher concordance between the cT and pT (79.1% vs. 64.8%, p = 0.003). The PI-RADS group also showed a lower proportion of pT3-4 (p < 0.001) in the cT1-2 subgroup and the cohort after propensity score matching. The PSM rate of cT3 patients was reduced by 39.2% in the PI-RADS group but without statistical significance (p = 0.089). CONCLUSIONS Preoperative MRI with standardized PI-RADS assessment could benefit the decision-making of patients by reducing the rate of pathologically confirmed non-organ-confined PCa after RP and slightly reducing the PSM rate compared with non-PI-RADS assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qianyu Peng
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Lili Xu
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Gumuyang Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Daming Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Jiahui Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xiaoxiao Zhang
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Xin Bai
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Li Chen
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China
| | - Zhengyu Jin
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
- National Center for Quality Control of Radiology, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| | - Hao Sun
- Department of Radiology, State Key Laboratory of Complex Severe and Rare Disease, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
- National Center for Quality Control of Radiology, Shuaifuyuan No.1, Wangfujing Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100730, China.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Taggart R, Dutto L, Leung HY, Salji M, Ahmad I. A contemporary analysis of disease upstaging of Gleason 3 + 3 prostate cancer patients after robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Cancer Med 2023; 12:20830-20837. [PMID: 37929881 PMCID: PMC10709727 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 09/24/2023] [Accepted: 09/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) in localised prostate cancer can be stratified using the 5-tier Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG) or 3-tier European Association of Urology (EAU) model. Active surveillance is the current recommendation if CPG1 or EAU low-risk criteria are met. We aimed to determine the contemporary rates of upgrading, upstaging and BCR after radical prostatectomy for CPG1 or EAU low-risk disease. METHODS A database of all robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomies (RALPs) performed in Glasgow between 12/2015 and 05/2022 was analysed. Rates of upgrading, upstaging and BCR post-RALP for CPG1 or EAU low-risk disease were defined. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the relationship between patient factors and outcomes. RESULTS A total of 1223 RALP cases were identified. A total of 12.6% met CPG1 criteria with 70.1% and 25.3% upgraded and upstaged to extraprostatic disease post-operatively respectively. A total of 5.8% met EAU low-risk criteria with 60.6% upgraded and 25.4% upstaged to extraprostatic disease post-operatively respectively. CPG1 (p < 0.0001) and EAU low-risk (p = 0.02) patients were at a significantly higher risk of BCR if upstaged. DISCUSSION Many patients who met CPG1 or EAU low-risk criteria were upgraded post-RALP and approximately 25% were upstaged due to extraprostatic disease. Upstaging puts patients at a significantly higher risk of BCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Hing Y. Leung
- Queen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
- CRUK Scotland InstituteThe Beatson Institute for Cancer ResearchGlasgowUK
- School of Cancer SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| | - Mark Salji
- Queen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
| | - Imran Ahmad
- Queen Elizabeth University HospitalGlasgowUK
- CRUK Scotland InstituteThe Beatson Institute for Cancer ResearchGlasgowUK
- School of Cancer SciencesUniversity of GlasgowGlasgowUK
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Checcucci E, Piana A, Volpi G, Piazzolla P, Amparore D, De Cillis S, Piramide F, Gatti C, Stura I, Bollito E, Massa F, Di Dio M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. Three-dimensional automatic artificial intelligence driven augmented-reality selective biopsy during nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A feasibility and accuracy study. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:407-415. [PMID: 38024433 PMCID: PMC10659972 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 05/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate the accuracy of our new three-dimensional (3D) automatic augmented reality (AAR) system guided by artificial intelligence in the identification of tumour's location at the level of the preserved neurovascular bundle (NVB) at the end of the extirpative phase of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Methods In this prospective study, we enrolled patients with prostate cancer (clinical stages cT1c-3, cN0, and cM0) with a positive index lesion at target biopsy, suspicious for capsular contact or extracapsular extension at preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging. Patients underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy at San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital (Orbassano, Turin, Italy), from December 2020 to December 2021. At the end of extirpative phase, thanks to our new AAR artificial intelligence driven system, the virtual prostate 3D model allowed to identify the tumour's location at the level of the preserved NVB and to perform a selective excisional biopsy, sparing the remaining portion of the bundle. Perioperative and postoperative data were evaluated, especially focusing on the positive surgical margin (PSM) rates, potency, continence recovery, and biochemical recurrence. Results Thirty-four patients were enrolled. In 15 (44.1%) cases, the target lesion was in contact with the prostatic capsule at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (Wheeler grade L2) while in 19 (55.9%) cases extracapsular extension was detected (Wheeler grade L3). 3D AAR guided biopsies were negative in all pathological tumour stage 2 (pT2) patients while they revealed the presence of cancer in 14 cases in the pT3 cohort (14/16; 87.5%). PSM rates were 0% and 7.1% in the pathological stages pT2 and pT3 (<3 mm, Gleason score 3), respectively. Conclusion With the proposed 3D AAR system, it is possible to correctly identify the lesion's location on the NVB in 87.5% of pT3 patients and perform a 3D-guided tailored nerve-sparing even in locally advanced diseases, without compromising the oncological safety in terms of PSM rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Checcucci
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Pietro Piazzolla
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Sabrina De Cillis
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Cecilia Gatti
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Ilaria Stura
- Department of Public Health and Pediatric Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Bollito
- Department of Pathology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Federica Massa
- Department of Pathology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Michele Di Dio
- SS Annunziata Hospital, Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Cosenza, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Oncology, Division of Urology, University of Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Orbassano, To, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Chang CB, Lin YC, Wong YC, Lin SN, Lin CY, Lin YH, Sheng TW, Yang LY, Wang LJ. Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Parameters Could Predict International Society of Urological Pathology Risk Groups of Prostate Cancers on Radical Prostatectomy. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:1944. [PMID: 37763347 PMCID: PMC10532885 DOI: 10.3390/life13091944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade and positive surgical margins (PSMs) after radical prostatectomy (RP) may reflect the prognosis of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. This study aimed to investigate whether DCE-MRI parameters (i.e., Ktrans, kep, and IAUC) could predict ISUP grade and PSMs after RP. METHOD Forty-five PCa patients underwent preoperative DCE-MRI. The clinical characteristics and DCE-MRI parameters of the 45 patients were compared between the low- and high-risk (i.e., ISUP grades III-V) groups and between patients with or without PSMs after RP. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the significant predictors of placement in the high-risk group and PSMs. RESULTS The DCE parameter Ktrans-max was significantly higher in the high-risk group than in the low-risk group (p = 0.028) and was also a significant predictor of placement in the high-risk group (odds ratio [OR] = 1.032, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.005-1.060, p = 0.021). Patients with PSMs had significantly higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) titers, positive biopsy core percentages, Ktrans-max, kep-median, and kep-max than others (all p < 0.05). Of these, positive biopsy core percentage (OR = 1.035, 95% CI = 1.003-1.068, p = 0.032) and kep-max (OR = 1.078, 95% CI = 1.012-1.148, p = 0.020) were significant predictors of PSMs. CONCLUSION Preoperative DCE-MRI parameters, specifically Ktrans-max and kep-max, could potentially serve as preoperative imaging biomarkers for postoperative PCa prognosis based on their predictability of PCa risk group and PSM on RP, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Bi Chang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (C.-B.C.)
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Chun Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (C.-B.C.)
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
| | - Yon-Cheong Wong
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (C.-B.C.)
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Nan Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (C.-B.C.)
| | | | - Yu-Han Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (C.-B.C.)
| | - Ting-Wen Sheng
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
| | - Lan-Yan Yang
- Biostatistics Unit of Clinical Trial Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
| | - Li-Jen Wang
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Gueishan, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan; (C.-B.C.)
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Darr C, Costa PF, Kahl T, Moraitis A, Engel J, Al-Nader M, Reis H, Köllermann J, Kesch C, Krafft U, Maurer T, Köhler D, Klutmann S, Falkenbach F, Kleesiek J, Fendler WP, Hadaschik BA, Herrmann K. Intraoperative Molecular Positron Emission Tomography Imaging for Intraoperative Assessment of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. EUR UROL SUPPL 2023; 54:28-32. [PMID: 37361199 PMCID: PMC10285557 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.05.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
In this prospective two-center feasibility study, we evaluate the diagnostic value of intraoperative ex vivo specimenPET/CT imaging of radical prostatectomy (RP) and lymphadenectomy specimens. Ten patients with high-risk prostate cancer underwent clinical prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) preoperatively on the day of surgery. Six patients received 68Ga-PSMA-11 and four 18F-PSMA-1007. Radioactivity of the resected specimen was measured again using a novel specimenPET/CT device (AURA10; XEOS Medical, Gent, Belgium) developed for intraoperative margin assessment. All index lesions of staging multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging could be visualized. Overall, specimenPET/CT correlated well with conventional PET/CT regarding detection of suspicious tracer foci (Pearson coefficient 0.935). In addition, specimenPET/CT demonstrated all lymph node metastases detected on conventional PET/CT (n = 3), as well as three previously undetected lymph node metastases. Importantly, all positive or close (<1 mm) surgical margins could be visualized in agreement with histopathology. In conclusion, specimenPET/CT enables detection of PSMA-avid lesions and warrants further investigation to tailor RP, based on a good correlation with final pathology. Future trials will prospectively compare ex vivo specimenPET/CT with a frozen section analysis for the detection of positive surgical margins and assessment of biochemical recurrence-free survival. Patient summary In this report, we examined prostatectomy and lymphadenectomy specimens for suspicious positron emission tomography (PET) signals after preoperative tracer injection. It was found that in all cases, a good signal could be visualized, with a promising correlation of surface assessment compared with histopathology. We conclude that specimenPET imaging is feasible and may help improve oncological outcomes in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Theresa Kahl
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Jenna Engel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Mulham Al-Nader
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Henning Reis
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jens Köllermann
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Krafft
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Tobias Maurer
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Köhler
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Klutmann
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Fabian Falkenbach
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Jens Kleesiek
- Institute of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Stibbe JA, de Barros HA, Linders DGJ, Bhairosingh SS, Bekers EM, van Leeuwen PJ, Low PS, Kularatne SA, Vahrmeijer AL, Burggraaf J, van der Poel HG. First-in-patient study of OTL78 for intraoperative fluorescence imaging of prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive prostate cancer: a single-arm, phase 2a, feasibility trial. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:457-467. [PMID: 37062295 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00102-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 03/02/2023] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Targeted real-time imaging during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy provides information on the localisation and extent of prostate cancer. We assessed the safety and feasibility of the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted fluorescent tracer OTL78 in patients with prostate cancer. METHODS In this single-arm, phase 2a, feasibility trial with an adaptive design was carried out in The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Netherlands. Male patients aged 18 years or older, with PSMA PET-avid prostate cancer with an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group of 2 or more, who were scheduled to undergo robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection were eligible. All patients had a robot-assisted radical prostatectomy using OTL78. Based on timing and dose, patients received a single intravenous infusion of OTL78 (0·06 mg/kg 1-2 h before surgery [dose cohort 1], 0·03 mg/kg 1-2 h before surgery [dose cohort 2], or 0·03 mg/kg 24 h before surgery [dose cohort 3]). The primary outcomes, assessed in all enrolled patients, were safety and pharmacokinetics of OTL78. This study is completed and is registered in the European Trial Database, 2019-002393-31, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, NL8552, and is completed. FINDINGS Between June 29, 2020, and April 1, 2021, 19 patients were screened for eligibility, 18 of whom were enrolled. The median age was 69 years (IQR 64-70) and median prostate-specific antigen concentration was 15 ng/mL (IQR 9·3-22·0). In 16 (89%) of 18 patients, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was accompanied by an extended pelvic lymph node dissection. Three serious adverse events occurred in one (6%) patient: an infected lymphocele, a urosepsis, and an intraperitoneal haemorrhage. These adverse events were considered unrelated to the administration of OTL78 or intraoperative fluorescence imaging. No patient died, required a dose reduction, or required discontinuation due to drug-related toxicity. The dose-normalised maximum serum concentration (Cmax/dose) in patients was 84·1 ng/mL/mg for the 0·03 mg/kg dose and 79·6 ng/mL/mg for the 0·06 mg/kg dose, the half-life was 5·1 h for the 0·03 mg/kg dose and 4·7 h for the 0·06 mg/kg dose, the volume of distribution was 22·9 L for the 0·03 mg/kg dose and 19·5 L for the 0·06 mg/kg dose, and the clearance was 3·1 L/h for the 0·03 mg/kg dose and 3·0 L/h for the 0·06 mg/kg dose. INTERPRETATION This first-in-patient study showed that OTL78 was well tolerated and had the potential to improve prostate cancer detection. Optimal dosing was 0·03 mg/kg, 24 h preoperatively. PSMA-directed fluorescence imaging allowed real-time identification of visually occult prostate cancer and might help to achieve complete oncological resections. FUNDING On Target Laboratories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith A Stibbe
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Hilda A de Barros
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Daan G J Linders
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Shadhvi S Bhairosingh
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Elise M Bekers
- Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Alexander L Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jacobus Burggraaf
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden University, Leiden, Netherlands; Centre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hu M, Ye L. Re: Jihad H. Kaouk, Ethan L. Ferguson, Alp Tuna Beksac, et al. Single-port Robotic Transvesical Partial Prostatectomy for Localized Prostate Cancer: Initial Series and Description of Technique. Eur Urol. 2022;82:551-58. Eur Urol 2023; 83:e52-e53. [PMID: 36357297 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.09.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 09/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Minxiong Hu
- Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical Medical College; Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Urology Department, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, P.R. China.
| | - Liefu Ye
- Fujian Medical University Provincial Clinical Medical College; Department of Urology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, China; Urology Department, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, P.R. China.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Panunzio A, Sorce G, Hoeh B, Hohenhorst L, Tappero S, Nimer N, Rajwa P, Tian Z, Terrone C, Chun FKH, Briganti A, Saad F, Shariat SF, Cerruto MA, Antonelli A, Karakiewicz PI. Effect of positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy on cancer-specific mortality in high/very high-risk prostate cancer patients with Gleason Grade Group 4-5. Prostate 2023; 83:268-276. [PMID: 36336728 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 08/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of positive surgical margins (PSM) on cancer specific mortality (CSM) in high/very high-risk (HR/VHR) prostate cancer (PCa) with aggressive Gleason Grade Group (GGG) is unknown. We tested PSM effect on CSM in this setting, in addition to testing of radiotherapy (RT) benefit in PSM patients. METHODS We relied on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015), focusing on HR/VHR patients with exclusive GGG 4-5 at radical prostatectomy (RP). Kaplan-Meier plots and multivariable Cox regression models tested the relationship between PSM and CSM. Moreover, the effect of RT on CSM was explored in PSM patients. RESULTS Of 3383 HR/VHR patients, 15.1% (n = 511) exhibited PSM. Patients with PSM harbored higher rates of GGG 5 (60.1% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001), pathologic tumor stage T3a (69.1% vs. 45.2%, p < 0.001) and lymph node involvement (14.1% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.001), relative to patients without PSM. PSM rates decreased over time (2010-2015) from 16.0% to 13.6%. Seven-year CSM-free survival rates were 91.6% versus 95.7% in patients with and without PSM, respectively. In multivariable Cox regression models, PSM was an independent predictor of CSM (hazard ratio = 1.6, p = 0.040) even after adjustment for age, prostate specific antigen, pathologic tumor stage and lymph node status. Finally, in PSM patients, RT delivery did not reduce CSM in either univariable or multivariable Cox regression models. CONCLUSIONS In HR/VHR PCa patients with exclusive GGG 4-5, PSM at RP adversely affect survival. Moreover, RT has no protective effect on CSM. In consequence, lowest possible PSM rates are crucial in such patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Gabriele Sorce
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Lukas Hohenhorst
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Stefano Tappero
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Nancy Nimer
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Carlo Terrone
- Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences (DISC), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology, Department of Urology, URI, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Departments of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Division of Urology, Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Sasaki T, Ebara S, Tatenuma T, Ikehata Y, Nakayama A, Kawase M, Toide M, Yoneda T, Sakaguchi K, Teishima J, Makiyama K, Kitamura H, Saito K, Koie T, Koga F, Urakami S, Inoue T. Prognostic differences among the positive surgical margin locations following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a large Japanese cohort (the MSUG94 group). Jpn J Clin Oncol 2023; 53:443-451. [PMID: 36708227 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyad004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate whether subgroups of prostate cancer patients, stratified by positive surgical margin locations, have different oncological outcomes following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. METHODS A retrospective multicenter cohort study in prostate cancer patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy was conducted at 10 institutions in Japan. Pre- and post-operative outcomes were collected from enrolled patients. Biochemical recurrence and clinical and pathological variables were evaluated among subgroups with different positive surgical margin locations. RESULTS A total of 3195 patients enrolled in this study. Data from 2667 patients (70.1% [N = 1869] with negative surgical margins and 29.9% [N = 798] with positive surgical margins based on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy specimens) were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 25.0 months. The numbers of patients with apex-only, middle-only, bladder-neck-only, seminal-vesicle-only and multifocal positive surgical margins were 401, 175, 159, 31 and 32, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, PSA level at surgery, pathological Gleason score based on robot-assisted radical prostatectomy specimens, pathological T stage, pathological N stage and surgical margin status were independent risk factors significantly associated with biochemical recurrence-free survival. Patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with multifocal positive surgical margins and seminal-vesicle-only positive surgical margins were associated with worse biochemical recurrence-free survival than those with apex-only, middle-only and bladder-neck-only positive surgical margins. Patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with apex-only positive surgical margins, the most frequent positive surgical margin location, were associated with more favorable biochemical recurrence-free survival that those with middle-only and bladder-neck-only positive surgical margins. The study limitations included the lack of central pathological specimen evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Although positive surgical margin at any locations is a biochemical recurrence risk factor after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, positive surgical margin location status should be considered to accurately stratify the biochemical recurrence risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takeshi Sasaki
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| | - Shin Ebara
- Department of Urology, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | | | | | - Akinori Nakayama
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan
| | - Makoto Kawase
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Masahiro Toide
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tatsuaki Yoneda
- Department of Urology, Seirei Hamamatsu General Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan
| | | | - Jun Teishima
- Department of Urology, Kobe City Hospital Organization Kobe City Medical Center West Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | | | | | - Kazutaka Saito
- Department of Urology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Japan
| | - Takuya Koie
- Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu, Japan
| | - Fumitaka Koga
- Department of Urology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Takahiro Inoue
- Department of Nephro-Urologic Surgery and Andrology, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Mie, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hao Y, Zhang Q, Hang J, Xu L, Zhang S, Guo H. Development of a Prediction Model for Positive Surgical Margin in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9560-9571. [PMID: 36547165 PMCID: PMC9776736 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Revised: 12/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
A positive surgical margin (PSM) is reported to have some connection to the occurrence of biochemical recurrence and tumor metastasis in prostate cancer after the operation. There are no clinically usable models and the study is to predict the probability of PSM after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) based on preoperative examinations. It is a retrospective cohort from a single center. The Lasso method was applied for variable screening; logistic regression was employed to establish the final model; the strengthened bootstrap method was adopted for model internal verification; the nomogram and web calculator were used to visualize the model. All the statistical analyses were based on the R-4.1.2. The main outcome was a pathologically confirmed PSM. There were 151 PSMs in the 903 patients, for an overall positive rate of 151/903 = 16.7%; 0.727 was the adjusted C statistic, and the Brier value was 0.126. Hence, we have developed and validated a predictive model for PSM after RALP for prostate cancer that can be used in clinical practice. In the meantime, we observed that the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score, and Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) were the independent risk factors for PSM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying Hao
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Jiangsu University, Nanjing 210008, China
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
| | - Junke Hang
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, China
| | - Linfeng Xu
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
| | - Shiwei Zhang
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
| | - Hongqian Guo
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Jiangsu University, Nanjing 210008, China
- Institute of Urology, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210008, China
- Department of Urology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210008, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Papa N, Perera M, Bensley JG, Evans M, Millar J, Frydenberg M, Murphy DG, Bolton D. A decade of declining prostatectomy margin positivity within a prostate cancer clinical quality registry. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:537.e19-537.e24. [PMID: 36167774 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2022.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Positive surgical margin (PSM) on radical prostatectomy (RP) is associated with an increased risk of biochemical recurrence and use of salvage therapies. Given these adverse consequences, exploration of time trends and predictors of PSM will improve the patient outcomes following surgery for prostate cancer. METHODS Pathological data from RP patients treated from 2011 to 2020 was extracted from the Victorian Prostate Cancer Outcomes Registry. This is a clinical quality registry that regularly benchmarks and reports back to individual clinicians the PSM percentage for their patients. Trends in PSM over time were visualized with separate running mean plots for both pT2 and pT3/4 disease. Predictors of PSM were explored with multivariable regression with date of surgery, surgical method, and hospital type, public or private, entered as covariates. RESULTS In total, 12,394 patients formed the sample with PSM recorded in 25% (n = 3,141) of patients, 12% (777/6,640) in pT2 disease and 41% (2,364/5,754) in pT3/4 disease. Comparing 2011-12 to 2019-20, the pT3/4 PSM proportion declined from 50% to 38% while pT2 percentages were steady at 13%. In "high volume" institutions, pT2 PSM fell from 12% to 6.5%. Independent predictors of lower PSM were robotic vs. open method and being treated at a private vs. public institution. CONCLUSION A clear decline in the proportion of pT3 PSM was observed in a large prostate cancer registry. Proposed explanatory factors include improved technical proficiency with robotic surgery and participation in a registry-based quality improvement initiative.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Papa
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia.
| | - Marlon Perera
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Australia; Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Jonathan G Bensley
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Melanie Evans
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia
| | - Jeremy Millar
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Australia; Radiation Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Frydenberg
- Department of Surgery, Monash University, Australia; Prostate Cancer Research Program, Faculty of Nursing, Medicine & Health Sciences, Monash University, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Australia
| | - Damien Bolton
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, University of Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Costa PF, Fendler WP, Herrmann K, Sandach P, Grafe H, Grootendorst MR, Püllen L, Kesch C, Krafft U, Radtke JP, Tschirdewahn S, Hadaschik BA, Darr C. Radiation Protection and Occupational Exposure on 68Ga-PSMA-11-Based Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging Procedures in Robot-Assisted Prostatectomy. J Nucl Med 2022; 63:1349-1356. [PMID: 34916249 PMCID: PMC9454458 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263175] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Cerenkov luminescence imaging (CLI) was successfully implemented in the intraoperative context as a form of radioguided cancer surgery, showing promise in the detection of surgical margins during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. The present study was designed to provide a quantitative description of the occupational radiation exposure of surgery and histopathology personnel from CLI-guided robot-assisted radical prostatectomy after the injection of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in a single-injection PET/CT CLI protocol. Methods: Ten patients with preoperative 68Ga-PSMA-11 administration and intraoperative CLI were included. Patient dose rate was measured before PET/CT (n = 10) and after PET/CT (n = 5) at a 1-m distance for 4 patient regions (head [A], right side [B], left side [C], and feet [D]). Electronic personal dosimetry (EPD) was used for intraoperative occupational exposure (n = 10). Measurements included the first surgical assistant and scrub nurse at the operating table and the CLI imager/surgeon at the robotic console and encompassed the whole duration of surgery and CLI image acquisition. An estimation of the exposure of histopathology personnel was performed by measuring prostate specimens (n = 8) with a germanium detector. Results: The measured dose rate value before PET/CT was 5.3 ± 0.9 (average ± SD) μSv/h. This value corresponds to a patient-specific dose rate constant for positions B and C of 0.047 μSv/h⋅MBq. The average dose rate value after PET/CT was 1.04 ± 1.00 μSv/h. The patient-specific dose rate constant values corresponding to regions A to D were 0.011, 0.026, 0.024, and 0.003 μSv/h⋅MBq, respectively. EPD readings revealed average personal equivalent doses of 9.0 ± 7.1, 3.3 ± 3.9, and 0.7 ± 0.7 μSv for the first surgical assistant, scrub nurse, and CLI imager/surgeon, respectively. The median germanium detector-measured activity of the prostate specimen was 2.96 kBq (interquartile range, 2.23-7.65 kBq). Conclusion: Single-injection 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT CLI procedures are associated with a reasonable occupational exposure level, if kept under 110 procedures per year. Excised prostate specimen radionuclide content was below the exemption level for 68Ga. Dose rate-based calculations provide a robust estimation for EPD measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro Fragoso Costa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P. Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Patrick Sandach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hong Grafe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Lukas Püllen
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claudia Kesch
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Krafft
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jan P. Radtke
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Stephan Tschirdewahn
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Boris A. Hadaschik
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany;,Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christopher Darr
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; .,Department of Urology and Urological Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
The Effect of Adverse Surgical Margins on the Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10081911. [PMID: 36009458 PMCID: PMC9405399 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2022] [Revised: 08/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Positive surgical margins (PSM) after radical prostatectomy are associated with a greater risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR). However, not all PSM harbour the same prognosis for recurrence. We aim to determine the impact of different PSM characteristics and their coexistence on the risk of BCR. This retrospective study included 333 patients that underwent robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer between 2015−2020 at a single institution. The effect of PSM and their adverse characteristics on the risk of BCR was assessed using Cox proportional hazard models. Kaplan−Meier was used to represent BCR-free survival stratified by margin status. With a median follow-up of 34.5 months, patients with PSM had a higher incidence of BCR, higher risk of relapse and lower BCR-free survival than negative margins (p < 0.001). We established as adverse characteristics: PSM length ≥ 3 mm, multifocality and Gleason at margin > 3. PSM ≥ 3 mm or multifocal PSM were associated with an increased risk for BCR compared to favourable margins (HR 3.50; 95% CI 2.05−5.95, p < 0.001 and HR 2.18; 95% CI 1.09−4.37, p = 0.028, respectively). The coexistence of these two adverse features in the PSM also conferred a higher risk for biochemical relapse and lower BCR-free survival. Adverse Gleason in the margin did not confer a higher risk for BCR than non-adverse margins in our models. We concluded that PSM are an independent predictor for BCR and that the presence of adverse characteristics, such as length and focality, and their coexistence in the PSM are associated with a greater risk of recurrence. Nevertheless, subclassifying PSM with adverse features did not enhance the model’s predictive performance in our cohort.
Collapse
|
34
|
The impact of 3D models on positive surgical margins after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2022; 40:2221-2229. [PMID: 35790535 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-04038-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/03/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the role of 3D models on positive surgical margin rate (PSM) rate in patients who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) compared to a no-3D control group. Secondarily, we evaluated the postoperative functional and oncological outcomes. METHODS Prospective study enrolling patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing RARP with mp-MRI-based 3D model reconstruction, displayed in a cognitive or augmented-reality fashion, at our Centre from 01/2016 to 01/2020. A control no-3D group was extracted from the last two years of our Institutional RARP database. PSMr between the two groups was evaluated and multivariable linear regression (MLR) models were applied. Finally, Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to calculate biochemical recurrence at 12 months after the intervention. RESULTS 160 patients were enrolled in the 3D Group, while 640 were selected for the Control Group. A more conservative NS approach was registered in the 3D Group (full NS 20.6% vs 12.7%; intermediate NS 38.1% vs 38.0%; standard NS 41.2% vs 49.2%; p = 0.02). 3D Group patients had lower PSM rates (25 vs. 35.1%, p = 0.01). At MLR models, the availability of 3D technology (p = 0.005) and the absence of extracapsular extension (ECE, p = 0.004) at mp-MRI were independent predictors of lower PSMr. Moreover, 3D model represented a significant protective factor for PSM in patients with ECE or pT3 disease. CONCLUSION The availability of 3D models during the intervention allows to modulate the NS approach, limiting the occurrence of PSM, especially in patients with ECE at mp-MRI or pT3 PCa.
Collapse
|
35
|
Sarychev S, Witt JH, Wagner C, Oelke M, Schuette A, Liakos N, Karagiotis T, Mendrek M, Kachanov M, Graefen M, Vetterlein MW, Meyer CP, Tian Z, Leyh-Bannurah SR. Impact of obesity on perioperative, functional and oncological outcomes after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center. World J Urol 2022; 40:1419-1425. [PMID: 35348869 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-022-03989-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare surgical, oncological and functional outcomes between obese vs. normal-weight prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). MATERIALS AND METHODS We assessed 4555 consecutive RARP patients from a high-volume center 2008-2018. Analyses were restricted to normal-weight vs. obese patients (≥ 30 kg/m2). Multivariable cox regression analyses (MVA) assessed the effect of obesity on biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastatic progression (MP), erectile function and urinary continence recovery. Analyses were repeated after propensity score matching. RESULTS Before matching, higher rates of pathological Gleason Grade group ≥ 4 (14 vs. 18%; p = 0.004) and pT3 stage (33 vs. 35%; p = 0.016) were observed in obese patients, with similar observations for surgery time, blood loss and 30-day wound- and surgical complication rates. For normal-weight vs. obese patients, BCR- and MP-free rates were 86 vs. 85% (p = 0.97) and 97.5 vs.97.8% (p = 0.8) at 48 months. Similarly, rates of erectile function at 36 months and urinary continence at 12 months were 56 vs. 49% (p = 0.012) and 88 vs. 85% (p = 0.003), respectively. Before and after propensity score matching, obesity had no effect on BCR or MP, but a negative effect on erectile function (matched HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.76-0.99; p = 0.029) and urinary continence recovery (matched HR 0.91, 95%CI 0.84-0.98; p = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS Obesity did not represent a risk factor of BCR or MP after RARP despite higher rates of adverse pathological features. However, obesity was associated with higher risk of perioperative morbidity and impaired functional outcomes. Such information is integral for patient counselling. Thus, weight loss before RARP should be encouraged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey Sarychev
- Department of Urology, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Jorn H Witt
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Christian Wagner
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Matthias Oelke
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Andreas Schuette
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Liakos
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Theodoros Karagiotis
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Mikolaj Mendrek
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany
| | - Mykyta Kachanov
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.,Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Malte W Vetterlein
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Christian P Meyer
- Department of Urology, Herford Hospital, Campus OWL, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herford, Germany
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah
- Prostate Center Northwest, Department of Urology, Pediatric Urology and Uro-Oncology, St. Antonius-Hospital, Gronau, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Pavel AG, Stambouli D, Gener I, Preda A, Anton G, Baston C. Genetic variant located on chromosome 17p12 contributes to prostate cancer onset and biochemical recurrence. Sci Rep 2022; 12:4546. [PMID: 35296725 PMCID: PMC8927158 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-08472-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The genetic contribution to prostate cancer (PC) onset and clinical heterogeneity has an important impact on the disease stratification accuracy. Despite the fact that radical prostatectomy (RP) is an effective treatment for localized PC, a considerable number of individuals develop biochemical recurrence (BCR) following surgery. In the present study, we decided to investigate the significance of genetic variability in a homogeneous group of Romanian men and to determine if genotyping could provide information regarding the possible implications of rs4054823 susceptibility loci in PC progression and outcome. A total of 78 samples from both PC and benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients were genotyped. The genotype frequencies were examined to see if there was a link between the 17p12 SNP and PC disease. When compared to the BPH group, the PC group had a significantly higher frequency of the T risk variant (P = 0.0056) and TT genotype (P = 0.0164). Subsequent analysis revealed that the TT genotype had a significantly higher frequency among younger PC patients based on their age at diagnosis and that it was related with a greater probability of BCR (P = 0.02). According to our findings, the TT genotype appears to be a risk factor for early-onset PC and a potential predictor for BCR after RP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anca Gabriela Pavel
- Molecular Genetics Department, Cytogenomic Medical Laboratory, Bucharest, Romania. .,The Romania Academy, "Stefan S. Nicolau" Institute of Virology, Bucharest, Romania.
| | - Danae Stambouli
- Molecular Genetics Department, Cytogenomic Medical Laboratory, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ismail Gener
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,Department of Nephrology, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Adrian Preda
- Center of Urological Surgery, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gabriela Anton
- The Romania Academy, "Stefan S. Nicolau" Institute of Virology, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catalin Baston
- Department of Nephrology, Urology, Immunology and Immunology of Transplant, Dermatology, Allergology, Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.,Center of Urological Surgery, Dialysis and Renal Transplantation, Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Radical or Not-So-Radical Prostatectomy: Do Surgical Margins Matter? Cancers (Basel) 2021; 14:cancers14010013. [PMID: 35008178 PMCID: PMC8749855 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14010013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2021] [Revised: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Prostate cancer is the second most common noncutaneous malignancy in men. Prostatectomy is a commonly used treatment modality for selected patients. The prostate’s ill-defined borders and its vicinity with vital structures complicate the wide excision of the organ, resulting in positive margins of resection. Neoplastic infiltration of margins of resection in prostatectomy specimens affects patients’ prognosis. The surgical technique and surgeons’ expertise affect the incidence of margin positivity. The location and the extent of positive margins diversify the risk of recurrence, with basal infiltration and multifocal foci of positive margins behaving more aggressively. Pathologists are encouraged to thoroughly report the status of margins of resection, as they provide important information for patients’ prognosis and enable the clinician to decide upon the most appropriate subsequent therapeutic steps. Abstract Prostate cancer is the second most common malignancy in men, and prostatectomy is the treatment of choice for most patients with at least low risk of progression. The presence of positive margins in the radical prostatectomy specimen is considered an adverse pathologic feature, and may prompt additional therapeutic intervention in the patients. The absence of a distinct capsule around the prostate and intraoperative manipulations that aim to minimize postoperative adverse effects, complicate its wide removal. Proper handling of the specimen during the gross processing is essential for accurate determination of the status of margins or resection. Positive margins, defined as the presence of neoplastic glands in the highlighted-with-ink margin of resection, range from 6–38%. The surgical technique, surgeon’s expertise and tumor (i.e., grade and stage) and patients’ (i.e., BMI) characteristics affect the rate of margin positivity. Extensive or multifocal and nonanterior/nonapical positive margins are linked with higher recurrence rates, especially in organ-confined disease, underscoring the need for treating these patients more aggressively. In summary, detailed description of the status of the margins should be performed in every pathology report to determine patients’ prognosis and the most appropriate therapeutic plan.
Collapse
|
38
|
Matti B, Reeves F, Prouse M, Zargar-Shoshtari K. The impact of the extent and location of positive surgical margins on the risk of biochemical recurrence following radical prostatectomy in men with Gleason 7 prostate cancers. Prostate 2021; 81:1428-1434. [PMID: 34570379 DOI: 10.1002/pros.24240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Positive surgical margins (PSM) after radical prostatectomy (RP) have been associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR). This is heavily influenced by other clinicopathological factors. This study aims to assess the impact of the extent and location of PSM on BCR following RP for Gleason 7 carcinoma of the prostate (CaP). MATERIALS AND METHODS All men treated with RP between 2008 and 2017 in our region for localized or locally advanced Gleason 7 CaP, were included. Clinical (age, year, preoperative prostate specific antigen) and pathological (prostate weight, positive or negative surgical margins, International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade, T stage) data were collected. PSM were subcategorised according to Extent into favourable (unifocal and <3 mm in length) or unfavourable (multifocal or ≥3 mm in length), and Location into apical only or others. The outcome was the risk of BCR which was calculated with univariable and multivariable regression models and reported as hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS The cohort constituted of 1433 men. Majority had ISUP 2 (71.2%) or localized (62%) disease. Men with PSM (n = 506) were at greater risk of BCR when compared to those with negative margins (adjusted HR = 1.52, [CI: 1.14-2.04], p = .005). Similar observation was demonstrated for both PSM location subgroups. As for the PSM extent category, only men with unfavourable PSM demonstrated an increase in BCR risk over negative margin (adjusted HR = 1.67, [CI: 1.23-2.28], p = .001). CONCLUSIONS Within this study settings, PSM were generally associated with increased BCR risk. This, however, was not demonstrated in favourable PSM extent cases. Observation rather than active treatment in these men should be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bashar Matti
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Fairleigh Reeves
- Department of Urology, Auckland District Health Board, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Matthew Prouse
- Department of Surgery, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Hayee A, Lugo I, Iakymenko OA, Kwon D, Briski LM, Zhao W, Nemov I, Punnen S, Ritch CR, Pollack A, Jorda M, Stoyanova R, Parekh DJ, Gonzalgo ML, Kryvenko ON. Anterior or Posterior Prostate Cancer Tumor Nodule Location Predicts Likelihood of Certain Adverse Outcomes at Radical Prostatectomy. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021; 146:833-839. [PMID: 34669939 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2021-0104-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Effect of tumor nodule (TN) location in the prostate on adverse radical prostatectomy (RP) outcomes is not well studied in contemporary cohort. OBJECTIVE.— To investigate the significance of TN location with respect to extraprostatic extension (EPE), seminal vesicle invasion (SV+), and positive margin status (SM+) in 1388 RPs. DESIGN.— Each TN at RP was independently graded, staged, and volumetrically assessed. TNs with at least 80% of their volume occupying either the anterior or posterior part of the prostate were categorized accordingly and included in our study, while all other TNs were excluded. RESULTS.— A total of 3570 separate TNs (median = 3 per RP; range = 1-7 per RP) were scored. There were 1320 of 3570 (37%) anterior TNs and 2250 of 3570 (63%) posterior TNs. Posterior TNs were more likely to be higher grade, and exhibit EPE (18% versus 9.4%) and SV+ (4% versus 0.15%), all P < .001. Anterior TNs with EPE were more likely to exhibit SM+ than posterior TNs with EPE (62% versus 30.8%, P < .001). TN location, grade, and volume were significant factors associated with adverse RP outcomes in our univariable analysis. When we controlled for grade and tumor volume in a multivariable analysis using anterior TN location as a reference, posterior TN location was an independent predictor of EPE and SV+ and was less likely to be associated with SM+ (odds ratio = 3.1, 81.5, and 0.7, respectively). CONCLUSIONS.— These associations may be useful in preoperative surgical planning, particularly with respect to improving radiographic analysis of prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amin Hayee
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Isabella Lugo
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Oleksii A Iakymenko
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Deukwoo Kwon
- Department of Public Health Sciences (Kwon), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Laurence M Briski
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Wei Zhao
- Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Ivan Nemov
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Sanoj Punnen
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Chad R Ritch
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Alan Pollack
- Radiation Oncology (Pollack, Stoyanova), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Merce Jorda
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Radka Stoyanova
- Radiation Oncology (Pollack, Stoyanova), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Dipen J Parekh
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Oleksandr N Kryvenko
- From the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (Hayee, Lugo, Iakymenko, Briski, Nemov, Jorda, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Department of Urology (Punnen, Ritch, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida.,Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center (Kwon, Zhao, Punnen, Ritch, Pollack, Jorda, Parekh, Gonzalgo, Kryvenko), at the University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging Analyses, Clinical Parameters, and Preoperative Nomograms in the Prediction of Extraprostatic Extension. Clin Pract 2021; 11:763-774. [PMID: 34698089 PMCID: PMC8544353 DOI: 10.3390/clinpract11040091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2021] [Revised: 08/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Proper planning of laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RP) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) is crucial to achieving good oncological results with the possibility of preserving potency and continence. Aim: The aim of this study was to identify the radiological and clinical parameters that can predict the risk of extraprostatic extension (EPE) for a specific site of the prostate. Predictive models and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) data from patients qualified for RP were compared. Material and methods: The study included 61 patients who underwent laparoscopic RP. mpMRI preceded transrectal systematic and cognitive fusion biopsy. Martini, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC), and Partin Tables nomograms were used to assess the risk of EPE. The area under the curve (AUC) was calculated for the models and compared. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the combination of variables that best predicted EPE risk based on final histopathology. Results: The combination of mpMRI indicating or suspecting EPE (odds ratio (OR) = 7.49 (2.31–24.27), p < 0.001) and PSA ≥ 20 ng/mL (OR = 12.06 (1.1–132.15), p = 0.04) best predicted the risk of EPE for a specific side of the prostate. For the prediction of ipsilateral EPE risk, the AUC for Martini’s nomogram vs. mpMRI was 0.73 (p < 0.001) vs. 0.63 (p = 0.005), respectively (p = 0.131). The assessment of a non-specific site of EPE by MSKCC vs. Partin Tables showed AUC values of 0.71 (p = 0.007) vs. 0.63 (p = 0.074), respectively (p = 0.211). Conclusions: The combined use of mpMRI, the results of the systematic and targeted biopsy, and prostate-specific antigen baseline can effectively predict ipsilateral EPE (pT3 stage).
Collapse
|
41
|
Martini A, Falagario UG, Cumarasamy S, Jambor I, Wagaskar V, Ratnani P, Haines Iii KG, Tewari A. The Role of 3D Models Obtained from Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Performing Robotic Prostatectomy. J Endourol 2021; 36:387-393. [PMID: 34555942 DOI: 10.1089/end.2021.0541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND mpMRI can provide important information for surgical planning, yet its interpretation is not immediate and imaging consultation at the time of surgery can result in interruptions and delay. The use of 3D models based on mpMRI, might obviate these issues. We aimed to evaluate the role of the prospective integration of 3D models from mpMRI in the robotic console in reducing the rate of PSMs. MATERIAL AND METHODS PSMs at our center are evaluated intraoperatively using the NeuroSAFE method. Based on the rate of PSMs on frozen section during the year prior to the implementation of 3D models during surgery (22.5%), we estimated that 151 subjects were needed to detect a statistically significant difference of at least 40%. Patients with biopsy-proven PCa who received a 3T mpMRI at our institution and had a PIRADS≥3 on mpMRI were included. RESULTS 151 patients were included. Overall, 17(11.3%) patients had a PSM, 6(35%) of them had PSM in an area where the mpMRI did not demonstrate any lesions. The rates of PSMs on both frozen (22.5 vs. 11.3%) and permanent section (13.1 vs. 6.6%) were significantly lower (p≤0.03) compared to the cohort of patients operated during 2018(n=358). No significant differences among clinical characteristics were found between the study cohort and the 2018 cohort (all p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS The use of 3D models at the time of surgery was shown to reduce the PSM rate on both frozen and permanent section. Integrating 3D models in the robotic console could lead to improved PCa outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Martini
- University Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy, Via Olgettina, 58, Milan, Italy, 20132;
| | - Ugo Giovanni Falagario
- Icahn School of Medicine, urology, 53 est 96 st, New York, New York, United States, 10128;
| | - Shivaram Cumarasamy
- Icahn School of Medicine, Urology, 1425 Madison Avenue, New York, New York, United States, 10029;
| | - Ivan Jambor
- Icahn School of Medicine, Urology, New York, New York, United States;
| | - Vinayak Wagaskar
- Icahn School of Medicine, Urology, New York, New York, United States;
| | - Parita Ratnani
- Icahn School of Medicine, Urology, New York, New York, United States;
| | | | - Ashutosh Tewari
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 5925, Urology, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1272, New York, New York, United States, 10029-6574;
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Harland N, Amend B, Lipke N, Brucker SY, Fend F, Herkommer A, Lensch H, Sawodny O, Schäffer TE, Schenke-Layland K, Tarín Sauer C, Aicher W, Stenzl A. [Organoids for the advancement of intraoperative diagnostic procedures]. Urologe A 2021; 60:1159-1166. [PMID: 34255127 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-021-01595-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
In the context of cancer surgery, there is always a trade-off between oncological safety and preservation of function. This is especially true in pelvic surgery due to the close relationship to the pelvic floor muscles, blood supply and nerves. Currently, risk models, preoperative imaging, the surgeon's assessment, and the intraoperative frozen section serve as the basis for decision-making. New imaging techniques and standardization in frozen section have significantly improved this in recent years. However, limitations remain due to time delays as well as more difficult correct anatomical assignment in the follow-up. Alternative intraoperative techniques may overcome this limitation in the future. Patient-derived organoids have emerged as an important new research vehicle in recent years. They are based on tumor stem cells that, under special culture conditions, form three-dimensional replicas of the original tissue. This makes them ideally suited for testing individual system therapies but also as a validation technique for new intraoperative diagnostic procedures. The Research Training Group 2543/I, which is funded by the German Research Foundation, is researching the potential of new diagnostic methods in an interdisciplinary team regarding validation in addition to intraoperative frozen sections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Harland
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.
| | - B Amend
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - N Lipke
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - S Y Brucker
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitäts-Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - F Fend
- Institut für Pathologie und Neuropathologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Herkommer
- Institut für Technische Optik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland
| | - H Lensch
- Fachbereich Informatik, Computergrafik, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - O Sawodny
- Institut für Systemdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland
| | - T E Schäffer
- Institut für Angewandte Physik, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - K Schenke-Layland
- Department für Biomedical Engineering, Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland.,NMI Naturwissenschaftliches und Medizinisches Institut, Universität Tübingen, Reutlingen, Deutschland
| | - C Tarín Sauer
- Institut für Systemdynamik, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Deutschland
| | - W Aicher
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| | - A Stenzl
- Klinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Hakam N, Abou Heidar N, Khabsa J, Hneiny L, Akl EA, Khauli R. Does a Positive Surgical Margin After Nephron Sparing Surgery Affect Oncological Outcome in Renal Cell Carcinoma? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Urology 2021; 156:e30-e39. [PMID: 34186133 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.04.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2021] [Revised: 04/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
We systematically evaluated the impact of positive surgical margins (PSM) on oncological outcomes after partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma. Forty-two studies comprising 101,153 subjects were included and five distinct meta-analyses were performed. PSM was associated with increased risk of local recurrence (hazard ratio (HR) 6.11-high certainty), metastasis (HR 3.29-moderate certainty), overall relapse (HR 2.25-high certainty), overall mortality (HR 1.30-moderate certainty), and may be associated with increased cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.91-low certainty). Patients with PSM should be counseled for the possibility of additional surgery, novel adjuvant therapies, and more rigorous surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizar Hakam
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; The Breyer Lab, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Nassib Abou Heidar
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Joanne Khabsa
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Layal Hneiny
- Saab Medical Library, University Libraries, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Elie A Akl
- Clinical Research Institute, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Raja Khauli
- Division of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Department of Surgery, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Tully KH, Schulmeyer M, Hanske J, Reike MJ, Brock M, Moritz R, Jütte H, Tannapfel A, von Bodman C, Noldus J, Palisaar RJ, Roghmann F. Identification of patients at risk for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy with intra-operative frozen section. BJU Int 2021; 128:598-606. [PMID: 33961328 DOI: 10.1111/bju.15446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify patients at risk for biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) after radical prostatectomy (RP) with intra-operative whole-mount frozen section (FS) of the prostate. MATERIAL AND METHODS We examined differences in BCR between patients with initial negative surgical margins at FS, patients with final negative surgical margins with initial positive margins at FS without residual PCa after secondary tumour resection, and patients with final negative surgical margins with initially positive margins at FS with residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection specimen. Institutional data of 883 consecutive patients undergoing RP were collected. Intra-operative whole-mount FS was routinely used to check for margin status and, if necessary, to resect more periprostatic tissue in order to achieve negative margins. Patients with lymph node-positive disease or final positive surgical margins were excluded from the analysis. Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses adjusting for clinical covariates were employed to examine differences in biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) according to the resection status mentioned above. RESULTS The median follow-up was 22.4 months. The 1- and 2-year BRFS rates in patients with (81.0% and 72.9%, respectively; P = 0.001) and without residual PCa (90.3% and 82.3%, respectively; P = 0.033) after secondary tumour resection were significantly lower compared to patients with initial R0 status (93.4% and 90.9%, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression only residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection was associated with a higher risk of BCR compared to initial R0 status (hazard ratio 1.99, 95% confidence interval 1.01-3.92; P = 0.046). CONCLUSION Despite being classified as having a negative surgical margin, patients with residual PCa in the secondary tumour resection specimen face a high risk of BCR. These findings warrant closer post-RP surveillance of this particular subgroup. Further research of this high-risk subset of patients should focus on examining whether these patients benefit from early salvage therapy and how resection status impacts oncological outcomes in the changing landscape of PCa treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karl H Tully
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Max Schulmeyer
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Julian Hanske
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Moritz J Reike
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Marko Brock
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Rudolf Moritz
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Hendrik Jütte
- Institute of Pathology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | | | - Christian von Bodman
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Joachim Noldus
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Rein-Jüri Palisaar
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Florian Roghmann
- Department of Urology and Neurourology, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr-University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Yang CH, Lin YS, Ou YC, Weng WC, Huang LH, Lu CH, Hsu CY, Tung MC. Biochemical recurrence of pathological T2+ localized prostate cancer after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy: A 10-year surveillance. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:1026-1036. [PMID: 33644166 PMCID: PMC7896665 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i5.1026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 12/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND pT2+ prostate cancer (PCa), a term first used in 2004, refers to organ-confined PCa characterized by a positive surgical margin (PSM) without extracapsular extension. Patients with a PSM are vulnerable to biochemical recurrence (BCR) following radical prostatectomy (RP); however, whether adjuvant radiotherapy (aRT) is imperative to PSM after RP remains controversial. This study had the longest follow-up on pT2+ PCa after robotic-assisted RP since 2004. Moreover, we discussed our viewpoints on pT2+ PCa based on real-world experiences.
AIM To conclude a 10-year surveillance on pT2+ PCa and compare our results with those of the published literature.
METHODS Forty-eight patients who underwent robotic-assisted RP between 2008 and 2011 were enrolled. Two serial tests of prostate specific antigen (PSA) ≥ 0.2 ng/mL were defined as BCR. Various designed factors were analyzed using statistical tools for BCR risk. SAS 9.4 was applied and significance was defined as P < 0.05. Univariate, multivariate, linear regression, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed for statistical analyses.
RESULTS With a median follow-up period of 9 years, 25 (52%) patients had BCR (BCR group), and the remaining 23 (48%) patients did not (non-BCR group). The median time for BCR test was 4 years from the first postoperative PSA nadir. Preoperative PSA was significantly different between the BCR and non-BCR groups (P < 0.001), and ROC curve analysis of preoperative PSA suggested a cut-off value of 19.09 ng/mL (sensitivity, 0.600; specificity: 0.739). The linear regression analysis showed no correlation between time to BCR and preoperative PSA (Pearson’s correlation, 0.13; adjusted R2 = 0.026).
CONCLUSION Robotic-assisted RP in pT2+ PCa of worse conditions can provide better BCR-free survival. A surgical technique limiting the PSM in favorable situations is warranted to lower the pT2+ PCa BCR rate. Preoperative PSA cut-off value of 19.09 ng/mL is a predictive factor for BCR. Based on our experiences and review of the literature, we do not recommend routine aRT for pT2+ PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Che Hseuh Yang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| | - Yi Sheng Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| | - Yen Chuan Ou
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| | - Wei Chun Weng
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| | - Li Hua Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| | - Chin Heng Lu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| | - Chao Yu Hsu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| | - Min Che Tung
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Tungs' Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital, Taichung 435403, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Zhang L, Zhao H, Wu B, Zha Z, Yuan J, Feng Y. Predictive Factors for Positive Surgical Margins in Patients With Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 10:539592. [PMID: 33628724 PMCID: PMC7897672 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.539592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives Previous studies have demonstrated that positive surgical margins (PSMs) were independent predictive factors for biochemical and oncologic outcomes in patients with prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to identify the predictive factors for PSMs after radical prostatectomy (RP). Methods We selected eligible studies via the electronic databases, such as PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE, from inception to December 2020. The risk factors for PSMs following RP were identified. The pooled estimates of standardized mean differences (SMDs)/odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. A fixed effect or random effect was used to pool the estimates. Subgroup analyses were performed to explore the reasons for heterogeneity. Results Twenty-seven studies including 50,014 patients with PCa were eligible for further analysis. The results showed that PSMs were significantly associated with preoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (pooled SMD = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.31–0.43; P < 0.001), biopsy Gleason Score (<6/≥7) (pooled OR = 1.53; 95% CI:1.31–1.79; P < 0.001), pathological Gleason Score (<6/≥7) (pooled OR = 2.49; 95% CI: 2.19–2.83; P < 0.001), pathological stage (<T2/≥T3) (pooled OR = 3.90; 95% CI: 3.18–4.79; P < 0.001), positive lymph node (PLN) (pooled OR = 3.12; 95% CI: 2.28–4.27; P < 0.001), extraprostatic extension (EPE) (pooled OR = 4.44; 95% CI: 3.25–6.09; P < 0.001), and seminal vesicle invasion (SVI) (pooled OR = 4.19; 95% CI: 2,87–6.13; P < 0.001). However, we found that age (pooled SMD = 0.01; 95% CI: −0.07–0.10; P = 0.735), body mass index (BMI) (pooled SMD = 0.12; 95% CI: −0.05–0.30; P = 0.162), prostate volume (pooled SMD = −0.28; 95% CI: −0.62–0.05; P = 0.097), and nerve sparing (pooled OR = 0.90; 95% CI: 0.71–1.14; P = 0.388) had no effect on PSMs after RP. Besides, the findings in this study were found to be reliable by our sensitivity and subgroup analyses. Conclusions Preoperative PSA, biopsy Gleason Score, pathological Gleason Score, pathological stage, positive lymph node, extraprostatic extension, and seminal vesicle invasion are independent predictors of PSMs after RP. These results may helpful for risk stratification and individualized therapy in PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lijin Zhang
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Hu Zhao
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Bin Wu
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Zhenlei Zha
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Jun Yuan
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| | - Yejun Feng
- Department of Urology, Affiliated Jiang-yin Hospital of the Southeast University Medical College, Jiang-yin, China
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Lenfant L, Garisto J, Sawczyn G, Wilson CA, Aminsharifi A, Kim S, Schwen Z, Bertolo R, Kaouk J. Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using Single-port Perineal Approach: Technique and Single-surgeon Matched-paired Comparative Outcomes. Eur Urol 2020; 79:384-392. [PMID: 33357990 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical perineal prostatectomy (RPP) has been revived with the advent of single-port (SP) robotic surgery. However, its interest and precise role need to be evaluated and better defined. OBJECTIVE To describe in detail the technique of SP-RPP and compare initial perioperative outcomes with those of multiport robot-assisted transperitoneal radical prostatectomy (MP-RARP). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS From October 2018 to June 2020, perioperative data of 26 consecutive patients who underwent SP-RPP for localized prostate cancer (PCa) in a single institution were prospectively entered into an institutional review board-approved database. Data of 86 consecutive patients treated from September 2017 to September 2018 with MP-RARP by the same surgeon, before the beginning of the SP experience, were used as comparators. SURGICAL PROCEDURE SP-RPP was performed using the SP robotic platform (Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA, USA) according to the technique described in the supplementary video. MEASUREMENTS Demographics, and intra- and postoperative data were analyzed in a matched-paired design with a 1:1 ratio on the following factors: age at surgery, prostate-specific antigen level, preoperative Gleason score, and history of abdominal surgery. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS After matching, baseline characteristics were comparable except for the rate of prior laparotomy, which was higher in the SP-RPP group (52% vs 8%, p < 0.001). In the SP-RPP group, 84% of the patients had a high risk and an unfavorable intermediate risk of positive surgical margins (PSMs) versus 57% in the MP-RARP group (p = 0.03). While the rate of nonlimited PSMs (ie, >3 mm) was higher in the SP-RPP group (38.5% vs 7.7%, p < 0.01), the number of patients with biochemical recurrence at 1 yr was comparable between SP-RPP and MP-RARP (1 vs 3, p = 0.3). CONCLUSIONS SP-RPP is a complex procedure for patients with a complex surgical history and high-risk localized PCa with limited alternative therapeutic options. PATIENT SUMMARY Our study suggests that patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer and limited treatment options due to a complex abdominal surgical history (ie, frozen pelvis) may be suitable candidates for single-port radical perineal prostatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louis Lenfant
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Urology Department, GRC n°5, Predictive Onco-urology, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Juan Garisto
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guilherme Sawczyn
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Clark A Wilson
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Alireza Aminsharifi
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Urology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Soodong Kim
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Zeyad Schwen
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jihad Kaouk
- Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Montorsi F, Gandaglia G, Würnschimmel C, Graefen M, Briganti A, Huland H. Re: Paolo Afonso de Carvalho, Joāo A.B.A. Barbosa, Giuliano B. Guglielmetti, et al. Retrograde Release of the Neurovascular Bundle with Preservation of Dorsal Venous Complex During Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Optimizing Functional Outcomes. Eur Urol 2020;77:628-35: Incredible Results for Robot-assisted Nerve-sparing Radical Prostatectomy in Prostate Cancer Patients. Eur Urol 2020; 79:e44-e46. [PMID: 33067018 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Christoph Würnschimmel
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| | - Hartwig Huland
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Darr C, Harke NN, Radtke JP, Yirga L, Kesch C, Grootendorst MR, Fendler WP, Costa PF, Rischpler C, Praus C, Haubold J, Reis H, Hager T, Herrmann K, Binse I, Hadaschik B. Intraoperative 68Ga-PSMA Cerenkov Luminescence Imaging for Surgical Margins in Radical Prostatectomy: A Feasibility Study. J Nucl Med 2020; 61:1500-1506. [PMID: 32060212 PMCID: PMC7539648 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.119.240424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Our objective was to assess the feasibility and accuracy of Cerenkov luminescence imaging (CLI) for assessment of surgical margins intraoperatively during radical prostatectomy. Methods: A single-center feasibility study included 10 patients with high-risk primary prostate cancer (PC). 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT scans were performed followed by radical prostatectomy and intraoperative CLI of the excised prostate. In addition to imaging the intact prostate, in the first 2 patients the prostate gland was incised and imaged with CLI to visualize the primary tumor. We compared the tumor margin status on CLI to postoperative histopathology. Measured CLI intensities were determined as tumor-to-background ratio. Results: Tumor cells were successfully detected on the incised prostate CLI images as confirmed by histopathology. Three of 10 men had histopathologically positive surgical margins (PSMs), and 2 of 3 PSMs were accurately detected on CLI. Overall, 25 (72%) of 35 regions of interest proved to visualize a tumor signal according to standard histopathology. The median tumor radiance in these areas was 11,301 photons/s/cm2/sr (range, 3,328-25,428 photons/s/cm2/sr), and median tumor-to-background ratio was 4.2 (range, 2.1-11.6). False-positive signals were seen mainly at the prostate base, with PC cells overlaid by benign tissue. PSMA immunohistochemistry revealed strong PSMA staining of benign gland tissue, which impacts measured activities. Conclusion: This feasibility showed that 68Ga-PSMA CLI is a new intraoperative imaging technique capable of imaging the entire specimen's surface to detect PC tissue at the resection margin. Further optimization of the CLI protocol, or the use of lower-energy imaging tracers such as 18F-PSMA, is required to reduce false-positives. A larger study will be performed to assess diagnostic performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Darr
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Nina N Harke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Leubet Yirga
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | | | - Christine Praus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Johannes Haubold
- Institute of Diagnostics and Radiology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Henning Reis
- Institute of Pathology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Thomas Hager
- Institute of Pathology, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; and
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Ina Binse
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Technical Refinements in Superextended Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy for Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients at Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol 2020; 80:104-112. [PMID: 32943260 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The feasibility and efficacy of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) in locally advanced prostate cancer (PCa) patients with iT3 lesion at magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are currently not explored. OBJECTIVE To describe our revised RARP technique (ie, superextended RARP [SE-RARP]) for PCa patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b at MRI. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Data from 89 patients with posterior iT3a or T3b disease who underwent SE-RARP at a single high-volume centre between 2015 and 2018 were analysed. SURGICAL PROCEDURE RARP was performed using a DaVinci Xi system. The surgical approach provided an inter- or extrafascial RARP where Denonvilliers' fascia and perirectal fat were dissected free and left on the posterior surface of the seminal vesicles. MEASUREMENTS Perioperative outcomes, and intra- and postoperative complications were assessed. Postoperative outcomes were assessed in patients with complete follow-up data (n = 78). Biochemical recurrence (BCR) was defined as two consecutive prostate-specific antigen values of ≥0.2 ng/ml. Urinary continence (UC) recovery was defined as the use of zero or one safety pad. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression models were used. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS The median operative time, blood loss, and length of stay were 204 min, 300 ml, and 5 d, respectively. The median bladder catheterisation time was 5 d. Overall, 28%, 28%, and 27% of patients had pathological grade group (GG) 4-5, pT3b, and positive surgical margins (PSMs), respectively. Three patients (3.4%) experienced intraoperative complications. Among patients with available follow-up data (n = 78), 14 (18%) experienced 30-d postoperative complications. The median follow-up was 19 mo. Overall, 11 patients received additional treatment. At 2 yr of follow-up, BCR-free and additional treatment-free survival were 55% and 66%, respectively. Pathological GG 4-5 (hazard ratio [HR] 3.2) and PSM (HR 5.8) were independent predictors of recurrence, as well as of additional treatment use (HR 5.6 for GG 4-5 and 5.2 for PSM). The 1-yr UC recovery was 84%. CONCLUSIONS We presented our revised RARP technique applicable to patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b at preoperative MRI. This technique is associated with good morbidity and continence recovery rates, and might guarantee biochemical control of the disease and postpone the use of additional treatments in patients with low-grade and negative surgical margins. PATIENT SUMMARY A revised robot-assisted radical prostatectomy technique applicable to prostate cancer patients with posterior iT3a or iT3b lesion at magnetic resonance imaging was described. This novel technique is feasible and safe in expert hands.
Collapse
|