Proenkephalin A 119-159 (PENK) is a promising functional kidney biomarker, evaluated in various clinical settings. In critical care medicine, early diagnosis of acute kidney injury (AKI) is crucial; however, to date, the diagnosis and the assessment of kidney function is still based on serum creatinine (sCr) and urine output, both associated with several limitations. Between November 2020 and March 2022, we implemented PENK in our daily practice on our intensive care units (ICU). PENK, sCr, AKI stage, and the start and duration of renal replacement therapy (RRT) were documented. Almost 18,000 PENK measurements from 4169 patients were analyzed, and the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was estimated with the new PENK-GFR formula. PENK outperformed sCR in the kidney function assessment and sCR trajectory over time. Moreover, PENK predicted the use of RRT and thus showed its usefulness in critical care daily practice.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a critical condition with diverse manifestations and variable outcomes. Its diagnosis traditionally relies on delayed indicators such as serum creatinine and urine output, making early detection challenging. Early identification is essential to improving patient outcomes, driving the need for novel biomarkers. Recent advancements have identified promising biomarkers across various biological processes. Tubular injury markers, including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP), offer insights into early tubular damage. Inflammatory and repair-associated biomarkers, such as interleukin-18 (IL-18), monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1), osteopontin (OPN), and C-C motif chemokine ligand 14 (CCL14), reflect ongoing injury and recovery processes. Additionally, stress and repair markers like tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-2 (TIMP-2) and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-7 (IGFBP-7), alongside filtration markers such as cystatin C (CysC) and proenkephalin (PenKid®) e.tal, further enhance diagnostic precision. Oxidative stress-related markers, including Superoxide Dismutase 1 (SOD1), also contribute valuable information. Emerging candidates, such as microRNAs, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR), and chitinase-3-like protein 1 (CHI3L1), hold substantial promise for AKI detection and prognosis. This review summarizes the progress in AKI biomarker research, highlighting their clinical utility and exploring their potential to refine early diagnosis and management strategies. These findings offer a new perspective for integrating novel biomarkers into routine clinical practice, ultimately improving AKI care.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with a significant burden of mortality worldwide. Each episode of AKI increases the long-term risk of death, especially if there is no recovery or insufficient renal recovery (i.e. restoration of kidney function). This narrative review summarizes relevant studies on the definition and prediction of renal recovery. The following databases were searched for references: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus. The period lasted from 1990 until 2024. The currently available criteria for renal recovery have been identified and discussed. Regarding restoration of kidney function prediction, seven studies on alternative or novel biomarkers have been reviewed. In the context of kidney replacement therapy and renal recovery, findings from four large, prospective randomized studies have been summarized. A standardized definition of renal recovery is presently not available. Specific biomarkers allow for an estimation of the likelihood of renal recovery under certain conditions. According to current knowledge, no dialysis method has been definitively shown to be advantageous for the recovery process.

Background: The recently updated definition of sepsis considers pathophysiologic mechanisms to guide initial therapy. Clearly, generalized recommendations for sepsis therapy may be limited by pre-existing multimorbidity in addition to sepsis-related multi-organ failure. In particular, a recommendation regarding fluid rescue therapy may require adequate cardiac function and/or the absence of sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. In all sepsis patients with compromised cardiac function or sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy, a patient-specific therapy regimen is required to prevent pulmonary edema and early death. Similarly, in sepsis, acute kidney injury with or without pre-existing chronic kidney disease requires attention to be paid to excretory renal function to avoid hypervolemia-mediated acute heart failure. In addition, hyponatremia related to intravascular hypovolemia may be explained by vasopressin stimulation. However, hypothetically, vasopressin hyporesponsiveness may contribute to sepsis-related acute kidney injury. In this review, relevant cardiorenal pathomechanisms will be assessed in the context of sepsis therapy. Conclusions: In conclusion, therapy for sepsis with acute kidney injury has to take cardiac comorbidity, if present, into account. The extent to which vasopressin hyporesponsiveness aggravates sepsis-mediated hypovolemia and renal insufficiency should remain a subject of further study.

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) commonly occurs in critically ill patients and is closely associated with adverse outcomes. A comprehensive analysis of the current research landscape in SA-AKI can help uncover trends and key issues in this field. This study aims to provide a scientific basis for research directions and critical issues through bibliometric analysis.

We searched all articles on SA-AKI indexed in the SCI-Expanded of WoSCC up to May 7, 2024, and conducted bibliometric and visual analyses using bibliometric software CiteSpace and VOSviewer.

Over the past 20 years, there has been a steady increase in literature related to renal repair following AKI. China and the United States contribute over 60% of the publications, driving research in this field. The University of Pittsburgh is the most active academic institution, producing the highest number of publications. J. A. Kellum is both the most prolific and the most cited author in this area. "Shock" and "American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology" are the most popular journals, publishing the highest number of articles. Recent high-frequency keywords in this field include "septic AKI," "mitochondrial dysfunction," "inflammasome," "ferroptosis," and "macrophage." The terms "mitochondrial dysfunction," "inflammasome," "ferroptosis," and "macrophage" represent current research hotspots and potential targets in this area.

This is the first comprehensive bibliometric study to summarize the trends and advancements in SA-AKI research in recent years. These findings identify current research frontiers and hot topics, providing valuable insights for scholars studying SA-AKI.

Circulating proenkephalin (PENK) is a stable endogenous polypeptide with fast response to glomerular dysfunction and tubular damage. This study examined the predictive value of PENK for renal outcomes and mortality in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Proenkephalin was measured in plasma in a prospective multicentre ACS cohort from Switzerland (n = 4787) and in validation cohorts from the UK (n = 1141), Czechia (n = 927), and Germany (n = 220). A biomarker-enhanced risk score (KID-ACS score) for simultaneous prediction of in-hospital acute kidney injury (AKI) and 30-day mortality was derived and externally validated.

On multivariable adjustment for established risk factors, circulating PENK remained associated with in-hospital AKI [per log2 increase: adjusted odds ratio 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13-2.09, P = .007] and 30-day mortality (adjusted hazard ratio 2.73, 95% CI 1.85-4.02, P < .001). The KID-ACS score integrates PENK and showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of .72 (95% CI .68-.76) for in-hospital AKI and .91 (95% CI .87-.95) for 30-day mortality in the derivation cohort. Upon external validation, KID-ACS achieved similarly high performance for in-hospital AKI (Zurich: AUC .73, 95% CI .70-.77; Czechia: AUC .75, 95% CI .68-.81; Germany: AUC .71, 95% CI .55-.87) and 30-day mortality (UK: AUC .87, 95% CI .83-.91; Czechia: AUC .91, 95% CI .87-.94; Germany: AUC .96, 95% CI .92-1.00), outperforming the contrast-associated AKI score and the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events 2.0 score, respectively.

Circulating PENK offers incremental value for predicting in-hospital AKI and mortality in ACS. The simple six-item KID-ACS risk score integrates PENK and provides a novel tool for simultaneous assessment of renal and mortality risk in patients with ACS.

Furosemide stress test (FST) is a novel functional biomarker for predicting severe acute kidney injury (AKI); however, pediatric studies are limited.

Children 3 months to 18 years of age admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care hospital from Nov 2019 to July 2021 were screened and those who developed AKI stage 1 or 2 within 7 days of admission underwent FST (intravenous furosemide 1 mg/kg). Urine output was measured hourly for the next 6 h; a value > 2 ml/kg within the first 2 h was deemed furosemide responsive. Other biomarkers like plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and proenkephalin (PENK) were also evaluated.

Of the 480 admitted patients, 51 developed AKI stage 1 or 2 within 7 days of admission and underwent FST. Nine of these patients were furosemide non-responsive. Thirteen (25.5%) patients (eight of nine from FST non-responsive group) developed stage 3 AKI within 7 days of FST, nine (17.6%) of whom (seven from non-responsive group) required kidney support therapy (KST). FST emerged as a good biomarker for predicting stage 3 AKI and need for KST with area-under-the-curve (AUC) being 0.93 ± 0.05 (95% CI 0.84-1.0) and 0.96 ± 0.03 (95% CI 0.9-1.0), respectively. FST outperformed NGAL and PENK in predicting AKI stage 3 and KST; however, the combination did not improve the diagnostic accuracy.

Furosemide stress test is a simple, inexpensive, and robust biomarker for predicting stage 3 AKI and KST need in critically ill children. Further research is required to identify the best FST cut-off in children.

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is defined as the development of AKI in the context of a potentially life-threatening organ dysfunction attributed to an abnormal immune response to infection. SA-AKI has been associated with increased mortality when compared to sepsis or AKI alone. Therefore, its early recognition is of the utmost importance in terms of its morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this review is to shed light on the pathophysiological pathways implicated in SA-AKI as well as its diagnostics and therapeutics. In this review, we will elucidate upon serum and urinary biomarkers, such as creatinine, cystatin, neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), proenkephalin A 119-159, interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and interleukin-18, soluble toll-like receptor 2 (sTLR2), chemokine ligand 2 (CCL2) and chemokine C-C-motif 14 (CCL14). In addition, the role of RNA omics as well as machine learning programs for the timely diagnosis of SA-AKI will be further discussed. Moreover, regarding SA-AKI treatment, we will elaborate upon potential therapeutic agents that are being studied, based on the pathophysiology of SA-AKI, in humans and in animal models.

Abnormal Wnt5a expression is associated with dysregulated inflammation and organ dysfunction. However, the effect of Wnt5a activation on the duration of organ dysfunction remains unclear. This prospective study investigated the association between Wnt5a levels and persistent acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with urosepsis. Serum creatinine and Wnt5a levels were measured on days 1 and 5 and at discharge in 87 patients diagnosed with urosepsis. Patients with urosepsis were classified into an improving acute kidney injury (AKI) group and a persistent or worsening AKI group according to the AKI stage on days 1 and 5. AKI recovery was defined as a discharge-to-baseline serum creatinine ratio of <1.5. Twenty-eight patients with urosepsis (32.2%) had persistent or worsening AKI, and their Wnt5a levels were higher on days 1 and 5 and at discharge than those with improving AKI. The association between Wnt5a levels and persistent or worsening AKI was maintained after adjusting for age, sex, baseline serum creatinine levels, and disease severity. Moreover, elevated Wnt5a levels were associated with an increased risk of major adverse kidney events. High Wnt5a levels at discharge were associated with unrecovered AKI and participants with AKI recovery had a steeper Wnt5a slope over time than those without recovery, irrespective of age, sex, baseline serum creatinine level, or disease severity. Assessment of Wnt5a expression was helpful in predicting AKI persistence and adverse outcomes in patients with urosepsis. Therefore, Wnt5a may serve as a valuable bio-marker for identifying the risk of persistence of AKI.

Renal dysfunction is a common complication following liver transplantation (LT). This study aimed to determine whether a comprehensive assessment of kidney function using nineteen serum and urinary biomarkers (BMs) within the first 48 h post-LT could enhance the prediction of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) and the need of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) during the first postoperative week.

Blood and urine (U) samples were collected during the pre- and postoperative periods. Nineteen BMs were evaluated to assess kidney health in the first 48 h after LT. Classification and regression tree (CART) cross-validation identified key predictors to determine the best BM combination for predicting outcomes.

Among 100 LT patients, 36 developed severe AKI, and 34 required KRT within the first postoperative week. Preoperative assessment of U neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein (L-FABP) predicted the need for KRT with 75% accuracy. The combined assessment of U osmolality (OSM), U kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP-1) within 48 h post-LT predicted severe AKI with 80% accuracy. U-OSM alone, measured within 48 h post-LT, had an accuracy of 83% for predicting KRT need, outperforming any BM combination.

Combined BM analysis can accurately predict severe AKI and KRT needs in the perioperative period of LT. U-OSM alone proved to be an effective tool for monitoring the risk of severe AKI, available in most centers. Further studies are needed to assess its impact on AKI progression postoperatively.Registered at Clinical Trials (clinicaltrials.gov) in March 24th, 2014 by title 'Acute Kidney Injury Biomarkers: Diagnosis and Application in Pre-operative Period of Liver Transplantation (AKIB)' and identifier NCT02095431.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) constitutes a common complication associated with liver or kidney transplantation, which may significantly impact the graft condition and perioperative mortality. Current AKI diagnostic criteria based on serum creatinine (sCr) and urine output alterations are widely utilized in routine clinical practice. However, the diagnostic value of sCr may be limited by various confounding factors, including age, sex, reduced or increased muscle mass, and pre-existing chronic kidney disease (CKD). Furthermore, sCr is rather a late indicator of AKI, as its concentration tends to increase only when the severity of the injury is enough to decrease the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Recent expertise highlights the need for novel biomarkers in post-transplantation AKI diagnosis, prediction of event-associated mortality, or evaluation of indications for renal replacement treatment (RRT). Over the last decade, the diagnostic performance of various AKI biomarkers has been assessed, among which some showed the potential to outperform sCr in AKI diagnosis. Identifying susceptible individuals, early diagnosis, and prompt intervention are crucial for successful transplantation, undisturbed graft function in long-term follow-up, and decreased mortality. However, the research on AKI biomarkers in transplantation still needs to be explored. The field lacks consistent results, rigorous study designs, and external validation. Considering the rapidly growing prevalence of CKD and cirrhosis that are associated with the transplantation at their end-stage, as well as the existing knowledge gap, the aim of this article was to provide the most up-to-date review of the studies on novel biomarkers in the diagnosis of post-transplantation AKI.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe and prevalent syndrome, primarily observed in intensive care units (ICUs) and perioperative settings. The discovery of a new biomarker for kidney function and injury, capable of overcoming the limitations of traditional markers, has the potential to improve the diagnosis and management of AKI. Proenkephalin A 119-159 (PENK) has emerged as a novel biomarker for AKI and has been validated in various clinical settings. It has demonstrated a faster response to AKI compared to creatinine and has been shown to predict successful weaning from renal replacement therapy in the ICU. PENK has also shown promise as an AKI biomarker in perioperative patients. Additionally, PENK has been proven to be effective in estimating mortality and morbidity in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, and those with traumatic brain injury or ischemic stroke. Incorporating PENK into a novel estimation of the glomerular filtration rate, referred to as the PENK-Crea equation, has yielded promising results.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critical illness is common, and survivors are faced with a host of adverse outcomes. In this article, we review the current landscape of outcomes and care in survivors of AKI and critical illness.

Follow-up care of survivors of AKI and critical illness is prudent to monitor for and mitigate the risk of adverse outcomes. Observational data have suggested improvement in outcomes with nephrology-based follow-up care, and recent interventional studies demonstrate similar findings. However, current post-AKI care is suboptimal with various challenges, such as breakdowns in the transition of care during hospital episodes and into the community, barriers for patients in follow-up, and lack of identification of high-risk patients for nephrology-based follow-up. Tools predictive of renal nonrecovery and long-term outcomes may help to identify high-risk patients who may benefit the most from nephrology-based care post-AKI.

Follow-up care of survivors of AKI and critical illness may improve outcomes and there is a need to prioritize transitions of care into the community. Further research is needed to elucidate the best ways to risk-stratify and manage post-AKI survivors to improve outcomes.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a multifactorial syndrome with a high risk of short- and long-term complications as well as increased health care costs. The traditional biomarkers of AKI, serum creatinine and urine output, have important limitations. The discovery of new functional and damage/stress biomarkers has enabled a more precise delineation of the aetiology, pathophysiology, site, mechanisms, and severity of injury. This has allowed earlier diagnosis, better prognostication, and the identification of AKI sub-phenotypes. In this review, we summarize the roles and challenges of these new biomarkers in clinical practice and research.

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (S-AKI) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We aimed to develop a nomogram for predicting the risk of S-AKI patients.

We collected data from septic patients admitted to the Provincial Hospital Affiliated with Shandong First Medical University from January 2019 to September 2022. Septic patients were divided into two groups based on the occurrence of AKI. A nomogram was developed by multiple logistic regression analyses. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated using C-statistics, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). The validation cohort contained 70 patients between December 2022, and March 2023 in the same hospital.

198 septic patients were enrolled in the training cohort. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and vasopressor use were independent risk factors for S-AKI. A nomogram was developed based on these factors. C-statistics for the training and validation cohorts were respectively 0.873 (95% CI 0.825-0.921) and 0.826 (95% CI 0.727-0.924), indicating high prediction accuracy. The calibration curves showed good concordance. DCA revealed that the nomogram was of great clinical value.

The nomogram presents early and effective prediction for the S-AKI patients, and provides optimal intervention to improve patient outcomes.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common form of organ dysfunction in the ICU. AKI is associated with adverse short- and long-term outcomes, including high mortality rates, which have not measurably improved over the past decade. This review summarizes the available literature examining the evidence of the need for precision medicine in AKI in critical illness, highlights the current evidence for heterogeneity in the field of AKI, discusses the progress made in advancing precision in AKI, and provides a roadmap for studying precision-guided care in AKI.

Medical literature regarding topics relevant to precision medicine in AKI, including AKI definitions, epidemiology, and outcomes, novel AKI biomarkers, studies of electronic health records (EHRs), clinical trial design, and observational studies of kidney biopsies in patients with AKI.

English language observational studies, randomized clinical trials, reviews, professional society recommendations, and guidelines on areas related to precision medicine in AKI.

Relevant study results, statements, and guidelines were qualitatively assessed and narratively synthesized.

We synthesized relevant study results, professional society recommendations, and guidelines in this discussion.

AKI is a syndrome that encompasses a wide range of underlying pathologies, and this heterogeneity has hindered the development of novel therapeutics for AKI. Wide-ranging efforts to improve precision in AKI have included the validation of novel biomarkers of AKI, leveraging EHRs for disease classification, and phenotyping of tubular secretory clearance. Ongoing efforts such as the Kidney Precision Medicine Project, identifying subphenotypes in AKI, and optimizing clinical trials and endpoints all have great promise in advancing precision medicine in AKI.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with persistent renal dysfunction, the receipt of dialysis, dialysis dependence, and mortality. Accordingly, the concept of major adverse kidney events (MAKE) has been adopted as an endpoint for assessing the impact of AKI. However, applied criteria or observation periods for operationalizing MAKE appear to vary across studies. To evaluate this heterogeneity for MAKE evaluation, we performed a systematic scoping review of studies that employed MAKE as an AKI endpoint. Four major academic databases were searched, and we identified 122 studies with increasing numbers over time. We found marked heterogeneity in applied criteria and observation periods for MAKE across these studies, with some even lacking a description of criteria. Moreover, 13 different observation periods were employed, with 30 days and 90 days as the most common. Persistent renal dysfunction was evaluated by estimated glomerular filtration rate (34%) or serum creatinine concentration (48%); however, 37 different definitions for this component were employed in terms of parameters, cut-off criteria, and assessment periods. The definition for the dialysis component also showed significant heterogeneity regarding assessment periods and duration of dialysis requirement (chronic vs temporary). Finally, MAKE rates could vary by 7% [interquartile range: 1.7-16.7%] with different observation periods or by 36.4% with different dialysis component definitions. Our findings revealed marked heterogeneity in MAKE definitions, particularly regarding component assessment and observation periods. Dedicated discussion is needed to establish uniform and acceptable standards to operationalize MAKE in terms of selection and applied criteria of components, observation period, and reporting criteria for future trials on AKI and related conditions.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common problem in critically ill patients and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Since 2012, AKI has been defined according to the KDIGO (Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome) guidelines. As some biomarkers are now available that can provide useful clinical information, a new definition including a new stage 1S has been proposed by an expert group of the Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI). At this stage, classic AKI criteria are not yet met, but biomarkers are already positive defining subclinical AKI. This stage 1S is associated with a worse patient outcome, regardless of the biomarker chosen. The PrevAKI and PrevAKI-Multicenter trial also showed that risk stratification with a biomarker and implementation of the KDIGO bundle (in the high-risk group) can reduce the rate of moderate and severe AKI. In the absence of a successful clinical trial, conservative management remains the primary focus of treatment. This mainly involves optimization of hemodynamics and an individualized (restrictive) fluid management. The STARRT-AKI trial has shown that there is no benefit from accelerated initiation of renal replacement therapy. However, delaying too long might be associated with potential harm, as shown in the AKIKI2 study. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether artificial intelligence will play a role in AKI in the future, helping to guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in patients admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality rates for this condition are high. To reduce the high incidence of short-term mortality, reliable prognostic indicators are required to facilitate early diagnosis and treatment of AKI. We assessed the ability of plasma proenkephalin (p‑PENK) and plasma neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (p‑NGAL) to predict 28-day mortality in AKI patients in intensive care.

This prospective study, carried out between January 2019 and December 2019, comprised 150 patients (100 male) diagnosed with AKI after excluding 20 patients discharged within 24 h and those with missing hospitalization data. Blood samples were collected to determine admission p-PENK and p-NGAL levels. The study outcome was 28‑day mortality.

The mean patient age was 68 years (female, 33%). The average P‑PENK and p‑NGAL levels were 0.24 ng/µL and 223.70 ng/mL, respectively. P‑PENK levels >0.36 ng/µL and p‑NGAL levels >230.30 ng/mL were used as critical values to reliably indicate 28‑day mortality for patients with AKI (adjusted hazard ratios 0.785 [95% confidence interval 0.706-0.865, P<0.001] and 0.700 [95% confidence interval 0.611-0.789, P<0.001], respectively). This association was significant for mortality in patients in intensive care with AKI. Baseline p-PENK (0.36 ng/µL) and p-NGAL (230.30 ng/mL) levels and their respective cut-off values showed clinical value in predicting 28-day mortality.

Serum PENK and NGAL levels, when used in conjunction, improved the accuracy of predicting 28-day mortality in patients with AKI while retaining sensitivity and specificity.

The aim of the present study is to investigate the prognostic utility of point-of-care (POC)-measured proenkephalin (PENK), a novel biomarker, in terms of predicting in-hospital mortality in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with septic shock.

Bedside PENK was measured in consecutive patients presenting to the ED with septic shock according to the Sepsis-3 clinical criteria. The association of PENK with inflammatory and routine biomarkers, and its role as a predictor of in-hospital mortality, was examined.

Sixty-one patients with septic shock [53% females, median age 83 years (IQR 71-88)] were evaluated. Median (IQR) values of creatinine, plasma lactate, soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (SuPAR), procalcitonin and PENK were 1.7 (1.0-2.9) mg/dL, 3.6 (2.1-6.8) mmol/L, 13.1 (10.0-21.4) ng/mL, 2.06 (0.84-3.49) ng/mL, and 205 (129-425) pmol/L, respectively. LogPENK significantly correlated with LogLactate (rho = 0.369, p = 0.004), LogCreatinine (rho = 0.537, p < 0.001), LogProcalcitonin (rho = 0.557, p < 0.001), and LogSuPAR (rho = 0.327, p = 0.011). During hospitalization, 39/61 (64%) patients died. In a multivariable logistic regression model, logPENK was an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality (OR 11.9, 95% CI: 1.7-84.6, p = 0.013).

POC PENK levels measured upon presentation to the ED strongly correlated with metabolic, renal and inflammatory biomarkers, and may serve as a predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with septic shock.

Sepsis and acute kidney injury (AKI) are two major public health concerns that contribute significantly to illness and death worldwide. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment are essential for achieving the best possible outcomes. To date, there are no specific clinical, imaging, or biochemical indicators available to diagnose sepsis, and diagnosis of AKI based on the KDIGO criterion has limitations. To improve the diagnostic process for sepsis and AKI, it is essential to continually evolve our understanding of these conditions. Delays in diagnosis and appropriate treatment can have serious consequences. Sepsis and AKI often occur together, and patients with kidney dysfunction are more prone to developing sepsis. Therefore, identifying potential biomarkers for both conditions is crucial. In this review, we talk about the main biomarkers that evolve the diagnostic of sepsis and AKI, namely neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), proenkephalin (PENK), and cell-free DNA.

The prediction of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)-related outcomes remains challenging. Persistent kidney excretory dysfunction for longer than 7 days has been defined as Acute Kidney Disease (AKD). In this study, we prospectively quantified serum Nostrin, an essential regulator of endothelial NO metabolism, in hospitalized patients with AKI.

In-hospital subjects with AKI of various etiology were identified through the in-hospital AKI alert system of the Brandenburg University Hospital. Serum Nostrin, and serum NGAL and KIM-1 were measured within a maximum of 48 hours from the timepoint of initial diagnosis of AKI. The following endpoints were defined: in-hospital death, need of kidney replacement therapy (KRT), recovery of kidney function (ROKF) until discharge.

AKI patients had significantly higher serum Nostrin levels compared to Controls. The level of serum Nostrin increased significantly with the severity of AKI. Within the group of AKI patients (n = 150) the in-hospital mortality was 16.7%, KRT was performed in 39.3%, no ROKF occurred in 28%. Patients who required KRT had significantly higher levels of serum Nostrin compared to patients who did not require KRT. Significantly higher levels of serum Nostrin were also detected in AKI patients without ROKF compared to patients with ROKF. In addition, low serum Nostrin levels at the timepoint of AKI diagnosis were predictive of in-hospital survival. For comparison, the serum concentrations of NGAL and KIM-1 were determined in parallel to the Nostrin concentrations and the results confirm the prognostic properties of serum Nostrin in AKI.

The current study suggests serum Nostrin as novel biomarker of AKI-associated mortality, KRT and Acute Kidney Disease.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) often complicates sepsis and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, several important clinical trials have improved our understanding of sepsis-associated AKI (SA-AKI) and impacted clinical care. Advances in sub-phenotyping of sepsis and AKI and clinical trial design offer unprecedented opportunities to fill gaps in knowledge and generate better evidence for improving the outcome of critically ill patients with SA-AKI. In this manuscript, we review the recent literature of clinical trials in sepsis with focus on studies that explore SA-AKI as a primary or secondary outcome. We discuss lessons learned and potential opportunities to improve the design of clinical trials and generate actionable evidence in future research. We specifically discuss the role of enrichment strategies to target populations that are most likely to derive benefit and the importance of patient-centered clinical trial endpoints and appropriate trial designs with the aim to provide guidance in designing future trials.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is becoming increasingly prevalent among hospitalized patients and carries a poor prognosis. While new biomarkers show promise in identifying early stages of AKI, accurately predicting severe outcomes such as the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT) or death remains a challenge. However, blood gas analyses (BGA) can be used to diagnose life-threatening complications associated with AKI. The objective of this study was to assess the role of BGA as a biomarker panel in both emerging and established cases of AKI.

Retrospective observational study examining subjects with newly developed acute kidney injury (AKI). The study will document venous and arterial pH, pCO2, and actual bicarbonate levels upon hospital admission and at the onset of AKI. The primary endpoints include in-hospital mortality, the need for kidney replacement therapy (KRT), and the recovery of kidney function (ROKF).

A total of 202 individuals were included in the study. Three variables were found to be independent predictors of in-hospital survival: admission arterial pH, arterial pH at acute kidney injury (AKI) onset, and arterial pCO2 at AKI onset. Additionally, venous pCO2 at AKI onset was identified as an independent predictor for the need of kidney replacement therapy (KRT).

Our study suggests that blood gas analysis may have a potential role in predicting severe outcome variables in acute kidney injury (AKI). The associated costs are minimal.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) after open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repairs (TAAA) is a common postoperative complication, associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Early detection and management of the kidney tissue damage remains of paramount importance. The aim of this prospectively conducted, observational trial was to evaluate the clinical applicability of Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) for the detection of postoperative AKI. Patients and methods: Thirty-six patients, planned for elective open TAAA repairs from January 2019 to December 2022, were recruited in two German centres (University Hospital Aachen and Charité - University Hospital Berlin). Blood samples were collected pre-surgery (baseline), directly postoperatively and at 12, 24 and 48 hours after surgery. The penKid concentration in plasma was measured using the immunoluminometric sphingotest® assay kit and they were statistically tested for association with AKI and other clinical parameters. Results: Twenty-four patients (62%) developed moderate or severe AKI postoperatively (Stage 2 or 3 of the KDIGO classification) and they had a significantly increased risk for the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (p=.023) or a fatal outcome (p=.035). Starting from the 12th hour after surgery, we found penKid correlating with AKI stage 2/3 (12 hour penKid mean in pmol/L: 93.9 vs. 43.1; c index .776, p=.0037) and renal replacement therapy (12 hour c index .779, p=.0035). Patients with multi-organ dysfunction syndrome had significantly increased penKid levels at all timepoints. Conclusions: We found penKid to be a promising biomarker for the early detection of postoperative AKI and in-hospital mortality after open TAAA repair, which may enable the early initiation of organ-protective strategies and reduction of further complications associated with AKI.

Proenkephalin A 119-159 (PENK) is freely filtered in the glomerulus with plasma levels correlating with glomerular filtration rate. Therefore, PENK has been proposed as an early indicator of acute kidney injury (AKI) although its performance is dependent on the clinical setting. This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the correlation between PENK levels and the development of AKI.

We conducted a comprehensive search on the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane databases, the website ClinicalTrials.gov and Cnki.net until June 26, 2023. Summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were used to amalgamate the overall test performance. Diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was employed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of PENK with other biomarkers. Quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) criteria.

We incorporated 11 observational studies with 3969 patients with an incidence of AKI of 23.4% (929 out of 3969 patients) with the best optimal cutoff value of PENK for early detection of AKI being 57.3 pmol/L. The overall sensitivity and specificity of PENK in identifying AKI were 0.69 (95% CI 0.62-0.75) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.68-0.82), respectively. The combined positive likelihood ratio (LR) stood at 2.83 (95% CI 2.06-3.88), and the negative LR was 0.41 (95% CI 0.33-0.52). The SROC curve showcased pooled diagnostic accuracy of 0.77 (95% CI 0.73-0.81). Interestingly, patients with a history of hypertension or heart failure demonstrated a lower specificity of PENK in correlating the development of AKI.

Our results indicate that PENK possesses significant potential as a biomarker for the early detection of the development of AKI, using a cutoff point of 57.3 pmol/L for PENK.

Early detection of acute kidney injury (AKI) is crucial for timely intervention and improved patient outcomes after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the potential of urinary collectrin as a novel biomarker for AKI in this patient population.

In this prospective, observational cohort study, 63 patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) were studied at the Medical University of Vienna between 2016 and 2018. We collected urine samples prospectively at four perioperative time points, and urinary collectrin was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Patients were divided into two groups, AKI and non-AKI, defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes Guidelines, and differences between groups were analyzed.

Postoperative AKI was found in 19 (30%) patients. Urine sample analysis revealed an inverse correlation between urinary collectrin and creatinine and AKI stages, as well as significant changes in collectrin levels during the perioperative course. Baseline collectrin levels were 5050 ± 3294 pg/mL, decreased after the start of CPB, reached their nadir at the end of surgery, and began to recover slightly on postoperative day (POD) 1. The most effective timepoint for distinguishing between AKI and non-AKI patients based on collectrin levels was POD 1, with collectrin levels of 2190 ± 3728 pg/mL in AKI patients and 3768 ± 3435 pg/mL in non-AKI patients (p = 0.01).

Urinary collectrin shows promise as a novel biomarker for the early detection of AKI in patients undergoing cardiac surgery on CPB. Its dynamic changes throughout the perioperative period, especially on POD 1, provide valuable insights for timely diagnosis and intervention. Further research and validation studies are needed to confirm its clinical usefulness and potential impact on patient outcomes.

Acute kidney injury is common in intensive care patients. Supportive care involves the use of renal replacement therapies as organ support. Initiation of renal replacement therapy has been the subject of much interest over the last few years with several randomised controlled studies examining the optimal time to commence treatment. In contrast to this, little evidence has been generated regarding cessation of therapy. Given that this treatment is complex, not without risk and expensive it seems timely that efforts should be expended at examining this vexing issue.

Although several studies have been reported examining the successful discontinuation of renal replacement therapies all studies reported to-date are observational in nature. Conventional biochemical criteria have been used as well as physiological parameters including urine output. More recently, more novel biomarkers of renal function have been studied. Although to-date no optimal variable nor threshold for discontinuation can be established.

Several variables have been described which may have a role in determining which patients may be successfully weaned from renal replacement therapy. However, few have been exposed to vigorous examination and evidence is sparse in support of any potential approach although urine output currently is the most often described. More recently novel biomarkers have also been examined but again are limited by study design and heterogeneity. Further research is clearly needed focussing on proposed variables preferably in multivariate models to improve predictive ability and successful cessation of therapy.

In clinical practice, kidney (dys)function is monitored through creatinine-based estimations of glomerular filtration rate (eGFR: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease [MDRD], Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration [CKD-EPI]). Creatinine is recognized as a late and insensitive biomarker of glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The novel biomarker proenkephalin (PENK) may overcome these limitations, but no PENK-based equation for eGFR is currently available. Therefore, we developed and validated a PENK-based equation to assess GFR.

In this international multicenter study in 1354 stable and critically ill patients, GFR was measured (mGFR) through iohexol or iothalamate clearance. A generalized linear model with sigmoidal nonlinear transfer function was used for equation development in the block-randomized development set. Covariates were selected in a data-driven fashion. The novel equation was assessed for bias, precision (mean ± SD), and accuracy (eGFR percentage within ±30% of mGFR, P30) in the validation set and compared with MDRD and CKD-EPI.

Median mGFR was 61 [44-81] ml/min per 1.73 m2. In order of importance, PENK, creatinine, and age were included, and sex or race did not improve performance. The PENK-based equation mean ± SD bias of the mGFR was 0.5 ± 15 ml/min per 1.73 m2, significantly less compared with MDRD (8 ± 17, P < 0.001) and 2009 CKD-EPI (5 ± 17, P < 0.001), not reaching statistical significance compared with 2021 CKD-EPI (1.3 ± 16, P = 0.06). The P30 accuracy of the PENK-based equation was 83%, significantly higher compared with MDRD (68%, P < 0.001) and 2009 CKD-EPI (76%, P < 0.001), similar to 2021 CKD-EPI (80%, P = 0.13).

Overall, the PENK-based equation to assess eGFR performed better than most creatinine-based equations without using sex or race.

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is a leading comorbidity in admissions to the intensive care unit. While a gold standard definition exists, it remains imperfect and does not allow for the timely identification of patients in the setting of critical illness. This review will discuss the use of biochemical and electronic biomarkers to allow for prognostic and predictive enrichment of patients with sepsis-associated AKI over and above the use of serum creatinine and urine output.

Current data suggest that several biomarkers are capable of identifying patients with sepsis at risk for the development of severe AKI and other associated morbidity. This review discusses these data and these biomarkers in the setting of sub-phenotyping and endotyping sepsis-associated AKI. While not all these tests are widely available and some require further validation, in the near future we anticipate several new tools to help nephrologists and other providers better care for patients with sepsis-associated AKI.

Predictive and prognostic enrichment using both traditional biomarkers and novel biomarkers in the setting of sepsis can identify subsets of patients with either similar outcomes or similar pathophysiology, respectively. Novel biomarkers can identify kidney injury in patients without consensus definition AKI (e.g., changes in creatinine or urine output) and can predict other adverse outcomes (e.g., severe consensus definition AKI, inpatient mortality). Finally, emerging artificial intelligence and machine learning-derived risk models are able to predict sepsis-associated AKI in critically ill patients using advanced learning techniques and several laboratory and vital sign measurements.

Recently, proenkephalin A (PENK A) has been shown to reflect glomerular dysfunction and to predict new-onset acute kidney injury and heart failure. While previous studies have investigated PENK A as a biomarker in individuals with preserved renal function, PENK A concentration in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) was not investigated. Plasma PENK A concentration was assessed in 88 patients with ESKD treated with hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD), and its associations with kidney function and heart failure indicators were investigated. In HD patients, the difference in PENK A levels before and after hemodialysis, was measured and further assessed for an association with the type of HD membrane used. PENK A levels did not differ significantly between HD and PD patients. In HD patients, the median PENK A concentration was significantly higher before than after hemodialysis (1.368 vs. 2.061, p = 0.003). No correlation was found between PENK A level and urea (p = 0.192), eGFR (p = 0.922), dialysis vintage (p = 0.637), and residual urine output (p = 0.784). Heart failure (p = 0.961), EF (p = 0.361), and NT-proBNP (p = 0.949) were not associated with increased PENK A concentration. PENK A does not reflect renal function and cardiac status in patients with ESKD. Further research is required to establish the clinical utility of the new biomarker in patients with impaired kidney function.

Interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) is expressed in immune cells and is a member of the interferon regulatory factor family. Recently, it has been found that IRF4 plays important roles in the acute kidney injury (AKI)-chronic kidney disease (CKD) transition, glomerular diseases and kidney allograft rejection. In particular, the relationship between IRF4 and the AKI-CKD transition has attracted widespread attention. Furthermore, it was also found that the deficiency of IRF4 hindered the transition from AKI to CKD through the suppression of macrophage-to-fibroblast conversion, inhibition of M1-M2 macrophage polarization, and reduction in neutrophil inward flow. Additionally, an examination of the crucial role of IRF4 in glomerular disease was conducted. It was reported that inhibiting IRF4 could alleviate the progression of glomerular disease, and potential physiopathology mechanisms associated with IRF4 were postulated. Lastly, IRF4 was found to have detrimental effects on the development of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and T-cell-mediated rejection (TCMR).

Recent evidence suggests an association of plasma Proenkephalin A 119-159 (penKid) with early and successful liberation from continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. However, these exploratory results are derived from a monocentric trial and therefore require external validation in a multicenter cohort.

Data and plasma samples from the "Effect of Regional Citrate Anticoagulation versus Systemic Heparin Anticoagulation During Continuous Kidney Replacement Therapy on Dialysis Filter Life Span and Mortality Among Critically Ill Patients With Acute Kidney Injury-A Randomized Clinical Trial" (RICH Trial) were used for this validation study. PenKid was measured in all plasma samples available at CRRT initiation and at day 3 of CRRT. Patients were categorized into low and high penKid groups with a cutoff at 100 pmol/l. Competing-risk time-to-event analyses were performed. Competing risk endpoints were successful and unsuccessful liberation from CRRT, the latter meaning death or initiation of a new RRT within one week of discontinuation of primary CRRT. Then penKid was compared to urinary output.

Low pre-CRRT penKid levels at CRRT initiation were not associated with early and successful liberation from CRRT compared to patients with high pre-CRRT penKid levels [subdistribution hazard ratio (sHR) 1.01, 95% CI 0.73-1.40, p = 0.945]. However, the landmark analysis on day 3 of ongoing CRRT demonstrated an association between low penKid levels and successful liberation from CRRT (sHR 2.35, 95% CI 1.45-3.81, p < 0.001) and an association between high penKid levels and unsuccessful liberation (sHR 0.46, 95% CI 0.26-0.80, p = 0.007). High daily urinary output (> 436 ml/d) was even stronger associated with successful liberation (sHR 2.91, 95% CI 1.80-4.73, p < 0.001) compared to penKid.

This study suggests that penKid may be a competent biomarker to monitor the recovery of kidney function during CRRT. This is in line with previous findings and investigated this concept in a multicenter cohort. Again, low penKid was associated with early and successful CRRT liberation, but was outperformed by high daily urinary output. The findings of this study now warrant further evaluation in prospective studies or a randomized controlled trial. Trial registration The RICH Trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02669589. Registered 01 February 2016.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects increasing numbers of hospitalized patients worldwide. The diagnosis of AKI is made too late in most individuals since it is still based on dynamic changes in serum creatinine. In recent years, new AKI biomarkers have been identified; however, none of these can reliably replace serum creatinine yet. Metabolomic profiling (metabolomics) allows the concomitant detection and quantification of large numbers of metabolites from biological specimens. The current article aims to summarize clinical studies on metabolomics in AKI diagnosis and risk prediction.

The following databases were searched for references: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus, and the period lasted from 1940 until 2022. The following terms were utilized: 'AKI' OR 'Acute Kidney Injury' OR 'Acute Renal Failure' AND 'metabolomics' OR 'metabolic profiling' OR 'omics' AND 'risk' OR 'death' OR 'survival' OR 'dialysis' OR 'KRT' OR 'kidney replacement therapy' OR 'RRT' OR 'renal replacement therapy' OR 'recovery of kidney function' OR 'renal recovery' OR 'kidney recovery' OR 'outcome'. Studies on AKI risk prediction were only selected if metabolomic profiling allowed differentiation between subjects that fulfilled a risk category (death or KRT or recovery of kidney function) and those who did not. Experimental (animal-based) studies were not included.

In total, eight studies were identified. Six studies were related to the diagnosis of AKI; two studies were performed on metabolic analysis in AKI risk (death) prediction. Metabolomics studies in AKI already helped to identify new biomarkers for AKI diagnosis. The data on metabolomics for AKI risk prediction (death, KRT, recovery of kidney function), however, are very limited.

Both the heterogenous etiology and the high degree of pathogenetic complexity of AKI most likely require integrated approaches such as metabolomics and/or additional types of '-omics' studies to improve clinical outcomes in AKI.

Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is common in critically ill patients and is strongly associated with adverse outcomes, including an increased risk of chronic kidney disease, cardiovascular events and death. The pathophysiology of SA-AKI remains elusive, although microcirculatory dysfunction, cellular metabolic reprogramming and dysregulated inflammatory responses have been implicated in preclinical studies. SA-AKI is best defined as the occurrence of AKI within 7 days of sepsis onset (diagnosed according to Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome criteria and Sepsis 3 criteria, respectively). Improving outcomes in SA-AKI is challenging, as patients can present with either clinical or subclinical AKI. Early identification of patients at risk of AKI, or at risk of progressing to severe and/or persistent AKI, is crucial to the timely initiation of adequate supportive measures, including limiting further insults to the kidney. Accordingly, the discovery of biomarkers associated with AKI that can aid in early diagnosis is an area of intensive investigation. Additionally, high-quality evidence on best-practice care of patients with AKI, sepsis and SA-AKI has continued to accrue. Although specific therapeutic options are limited, several clinical trials have evaluated the use of care bundles and extracorporeal techniques as potential therapeutic approaches. Here we provide graded recommendations for managing SA-AKI and highlight priorities for future research.

A biomarker is a molecule that can be measured in a biological sample in an objective, systematic, and precise way, whose levels indicate whether a process is normal or pathological. Knowing the most important biomarkers and their characteristics is the key to precision medicine in intensive and perioperative care. Biomarkers can be used to diagnose, in assessment of disease severity, to stratify risk, to predict and guide clinical decisions, and to guide treatments and response to them. In this review, we will analyze what characteristics a biomarker should have and how to ensure its usefulness, and we will review the biomarkers that in our opinion can make their knowledge more useful to the reader in their clinical practice, with a future perspective. These biomarkers, in our opinion, are lactate, C-Reactive Protein, Troponins T and I, Brain Natriuretic Peptides, Procalcitonin, MR-ProAdrenomedullin and BioAdrenomedullin, Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio and lymphopenia, Proenkephalin, NefroCheck, Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), Interleukin 6, Urokinase-type soluble plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), Presepsin, Pancreatic Stone Protein (PSP), and Dipeptidyl peptidase 3 (DPP3). Finally, we propose an approach to the perioperative evaluation of high-risk patients and critically ill patients in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) based on biomarkers.

Acute kidney injury (AKI) affects increasing numbers of hospitalized patients; the prognosis remains poor. The diagnosis is still based on the 2012 published KDIGO criteria. Numerous new AKI biomarkers have been identified in recent years; they either reflect impaired excretory function or structural damage. The majority of markers are useful for AKI recognition under certain circumstances. Fewer data are available on the role of biomarkers in the prediction of in-hospital survival and renal recovery post-AKI. The current article is intended to provide information about these two aspects.

The following databases were screened: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Scopus. The period lasted from 2000 until 2022. The following terms were applied: "AKI" AND "biomarker" AND "survival" OR "mortality" OR "recovery of kidney function" OR "renal recovery" OR "kidney recovery". The following terms were used for additional literature search: "TIMP-2" AND "IGFBP7" and "RNA biomarker" AND "hematology". Regarding mortality, exclusively those studies were selected that addressed the in-hospital mortality. Nine (9) studies were identified that evaluated biomarker-based prediction of in-hospital mortality and/or of recovery of kidney function (ROKF). A homogenous definition of ROKF is however missing yet. Currently, some biomarkers, measured early during the course of the disease, are associated with increased mortality risk and/or with a higher chance of renal recovery.

The literature provides only a few biomarker-related studies that address the issues of mortality and recovery. The definition of ROKF needs to be homogenized.

Background and Objectives: In order to accelerate the risk stratification of patients referred to the Emergency Department (ED) with interstitial pneumonia, it could be useful to provide new and effective laboratory tests for use. The aim of our study was to evaluate the prognostic role of two biomarkers, bio-adrenomedullin (Bio-ADM) and proenkephalin (penKid), in patients with interstitial pneumonia (IP) at ED admission. Materials and Methods: In 153 consecutive patients with IP, both from COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 etiology, we measured, in a prospective observational manner, penKid and Bio-ADM at ED admission and after 24 h. In order to evaluate patient outcomes, 30-day follow-ups were also performed. The endpoints were 24 h, 10-day, and 30-day mortality. Results: Both biomarkers were shown to be good predictors of adverse events at 30 days, with Bio-ADM outperforming penKid. Bio-ADM was linked with 24 h and 10-day patient mortality. Moreover, PenKid was related to parameters defining worsening kidney function. Conclusions: Both in patients with COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 interstitial pneumonia at ED admission, Bio-ADM and penKid were good predictors of patient mortality. To evaluate these two biomarkers could be considered to be useful during the first evaluation in the ED when integrated with clinical scores.