Crohn's disease (CD) is characterized by an inflammatory response to gut microbiota. Macrophages and dendritic cells play an active role in CD inflammation. Specific microbiota have been implicated in the pathogenesis of ileal CD. We investigated the phagocyte-associated microbiome using an unbiased sequencing approach to identify potential pathobionts and elucidate the host response to these microbes.

We collected ileal and colonic mucosal biopsies from CD patients and controls without inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), isolated lamina propria phagocytes (CD11b+ cells), and performed deep RNA sequencing (n = 37). Reads were mapped to the human genome for host gene expression analysis and a prokaryotic database for microbiome taxonomic and metatranscriptomic profiling. Results were confirmed in a second IBD cohort (n = 17). Lysed lamina propria cells were plated for bacterial culturing; isolated colonies underwent whole genome sequencing (n = 11).

Crohn's disease ileal phagocytes contained higher relative abundances of Escherichia coli, Ruminococcus gnavus, and Enterocloster spp. than those from controls. CD phagocyte-associated microbes had increased expression of lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis pathways. Phagocytes with a higher pathobiont burden showed increased expression of pro-inflammatory and antimicrobial genes, including PI3 (antimicrobial peptide) and BPIFB1 (LPS-binding molecule). E. coli isolated from the CD lamina propria had more flagellar motility and antibiotic resistance genes than control-derived strains.

Lamina propria resident phagocytes harbor bacterial strains that may act as pathobionts in CD. Our findings shed light on the role of pathobionts and the immune response in CD pathogenesis and suggest new targets for therapies.

The EXIT trial found no difference in sustained remission at 12 months between inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients in remission who withdrew anti-TNF therapy [withdrawal arm (WA)] and those who maintained treatment [maintenance arm (MA)].

To compare the long-term risk of relapse between these groups and assess the response to anti-TNF resumption.

This was a follow-up extension of the EXIT trial. We analysed long-term outcomes of patients in sustained clinical remission from the start of EXIT.

We included 125 patients (63 in MA and 62 in WA). Median follow-up was 12 months for MA and 26 months for WA. The cumulative incidence of relapse (95% CI) was 35% (23%-48%) in MA and 47% (34%-60%) in WA; p = 0.3. In MA, relapses occurred in 8% of patients by 12 months and 47% by 24 months. In WA, relapses occurred in 16% by 12 months and 39% by 24 months. The incidence rate of relapse per patient-year was 22% in MA and 19% in WA. Baseline faecal calprotectin > 250 μg/g was the only variable associated with a higher risk of relapse. Of the 29 patients who relapsed in WA, 26 (90%) resumed anti-TNF therapy; of these, 69% regained clinical remission.

In this extended analysis of patients included in the EXIT trial, withdrawing anti-TNF therapy in patients with IBD in remission was not associated with a higher long-term relapse risk.

Background/Objectives: In the current era of tailored therapy, biologics such as vedolizumab (VDZ) and ustekinumab (UST) are increasingly administered to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. The decision to discontinue biologics after side effects or a lack of response is usually simple, but the decision to stop treatment in patients in remission is more difficult: to date, no study has been conducted to investigate the effects of VDZ or UST withdrawal. Our study aims to investigate the rates and predictors of relapse of IBD after the discontinuation of VDZ and UST during a well-controlled disease phase and to evaluate the response to retreatment. Methods: In this observational, multicenter, retrospective study, we included IBD patients who discontinued VDZ or UST during a well-controlled disease phase after at least 1 year of treatment. We collected demographic and clinical data for each patient at the time of discontinuation and at follow-up visits. Results: We included 36 IBD patients from 5 different centers; 80.0%, 58.5%, and 48.3% of patients maintained clinical remission at 12, 24, and 48 months after discontinuation, respectively. Crohn's disease (CD) patients were more likely to maintain remission than ulcerative colitis (UC) patients at 48 months (70.0% vs. 40.0%). No predictors of relapse were identified, but UC patients had a higher risk of early relapse than CD patients (HR = 3.23); 81.3% of retreated IBD patients achieved clinical remission after induction and at 12 months. Conclusions: No predictors of disease relapse after treatment discontinuation were identified. Half of the patients had a relapse within 48 months after discontinuation, but most of them achieved clinical remission after retreatment.

Advanced therapies (ADT) that encompass biological agents and small molecules have been approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), broadening the spectrum of available treatment options. Nevertheless, a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve satisfactory responses, necessitating surgical intervention. Treatment objectives have evolved beyond clinical remission, reduction of inflammation, and mucosal healing, shifting focus toward enhancing the quality of life, acknowledging the profound impact of IBD on physical and mental well-being.

This comprehensive review describes the current landscape of ADT for IBD, including dual biologic therapy (DBT), which involves the combination of two biologics or a single biologic with a small-molecule compound, as well as considerations surrounding the discontinuation of biologics.

ADT is the standard treatment for moderate to severe IBD, while DBT appears promising for specific subsets of patients, including those with refractory disease or extraintestinal manifestations. However, these approaches may increase the risk of adverse effects, including malignancy. To optimize individualized treatment strategies in patients with refractory IBD, further trials are needed to refine ADT's predictive value, establish DBT's safety and indications, define biologic discontinuation criteria, and evaluate emerging biomarkers, artificial intelligence, and bowel ultrasound in patient management.

Introduction of anti-TNF treatment has greatly improved prognosis of Behcet's disease (BD). Withdrawal of anti-TNF treatment in chronic inflammatory arthritis or bowel disease has been associated with sustained remission in subsets of patients. Herein, we examined the probability of very long-term quiescence after withdrawal of TNF inhibitors in BD.

Retrospective longitudinal outcome single-center study focusing on BD patients who discontinued successful ant-TNF treatment since 2001. Endpoint was their proportion with sustained clinical remission for 5 years after withdrawal.

Thirty-three patients with severe BD refractory to non-biologic treatment (mean age 47.5 ± 11.5 years, 55% men) achieved TNF inhibitor-induced remission for a median of 2 years (IQR [1-2.6]). TNF inhibitors had been given for sight-threatening disease (28/33, 82%), for mucocutaneous (3/33), central nervous system (2/33) and gastrointestinal involvement (1/33). After withdrawal, BD remained in remission in 15/33 patients for 6.6 to 20.6 years (mean 13.5 ± 3.8). Conversely, 18/33 patients relapsed after a median of 9.5 months [IQR 8-12, range 4-32] following withdrawal but retreatment with TNF inhibitors was effective in 13/18. Of them, 9/13 discontinued for a second time and achieved again the study's endpoint, remaining in remission for median of 7.4 years ([IQR 5-9.3, range 5-15 years). Study's end-point was met by 24/33 patients (73%); 17and 7 patients remain any-drug free or on azathioprine only, respectively.

Discontinuation of successful anti-TNF treatment is frequently associated with durable very long-term remission in severe BD. Additional studies are needed since relapses not responding to anti-TNF re-treatment may occur.

Primary objectives: to compare the rates of sustained clinical remission at 12 months in patients treated with antitumour necrosis factor (anti-TNF) and immunomodulators who withdraw anti-TNF treatment versus those who maintain it.

to evaluate the effect of anti-TNF withdrawal on relapse-free time, endoscopic and radiological activity, safety, quality of life and work productivity; and to identify predictive factors for relapse.

Prospective, quadruple-blind, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial. Patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease in clinical remission for >6 months and absence of severe endoscopic (and radiological in Crohn's disease) lesions were randomised to maintain anti-TNF treatment (maintenance arm (MA)) or to withdraw it (withdrawal arm (WA)). All patients maintained immunomodulators. Patients were followed-up until month 12 or up to clinical relapse.

One-hundred forty patients were randomised: 70 were allocated to the MA and 70 to the WA. The proportion of patients with sustained clinical remission at 12 months was similar in the MA and WA: 59/70 (84%), 95% CI=74% to 92% versus 53/70 (76%), 95% CI=64% to 85%. The proportion of patients with significant endoscopic lesions at the end of follow-up was 8.5% in the MA and 19% in the WA (p=0.1); a higher proportion of patients had faecal calprotectin >250 µg/g at the end of follow-up in the WA (p=0.01). The same percentage of patients in both groups had at least one adverse event (69%). The proportion of patients with serious adverse events was also similar in both groups (4% in MA vs 7% in WA).

Anti-TNF withdrawal in selected patients with IBD in clinical, endoscopic and radiological remission has no impact on sustained clinical remission at 1 year although objective markers of activity were higher in patients who withdrew treatment.

https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2015-001410-10 https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02994836.

This American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) living guideline is intended to support practitioners in the pharmacological management of moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC).

A multidisciplinary panel of content experts and guideline methodologists used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) framework to prioritize clinical questions, identify patient-centered outcomes, conduct an evidence synthesis, and develop recommendations on the pharmacological management of moderate-to-severe UC.

The AGA guideline panel made 14 recommendations. In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, the AGA recommends the use of infliximab, golimumab, vedolizumab, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, risankizumab, and guselkumab, and suggests the use of adalimumab, filgotinib, and mirikizumab over no treatment. In patients who are naïve to advanced therapies, the AGA suggests using a higher-efficacy medication (eg, infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, and guselkumab) or an intermediate-efficacy medication (eg, golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, and mirikizumab) rather than a lower-efficacy medication (eg, adalimumab). In patients who have previously been exposed to 1 or more advanced therapies, particularly tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α antagonists, the AGA suggests using a higher-efficacy medication (eg, tofacitinib, upadacitinib, and ustekinumab) or an intermediate-efficacy medication (eg, filgotinib, mirikizumab, risankizumab, and guselkumab) rather than a lower-efficacy medication (eg, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, and etrasimod). In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, the AGA suggests against using thiopurine monotherapy for induction of remission, but suggests using thiopurine monotherapy over no treatment for maintenance of (typically corticosteroid-induced) remission. The AGA suggests against using methotrexate monotherapy, for induction or maintenance of remission. In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, the AGA suggests the use of infliximab, adalimumab, and golimumab in combination with an immunomodulator over corresponding monotherapy. However, the AGA makes no recommendation in favor of, or against, the use of non-TNF antagonist biologics in combination with an immunomodulator over non-TNF biologic alone. In patients with UC who are in corticosteroid-free clinical remission for at least 6 months on combination therapy of TNF antagonists and an immunomodulator, the AGA suggests against withdrawal of TNF antagonists, but makes no recommendation in favor of, or against, withdrawing immunomodulators. In adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC, who have failed 5-aminosalicylates, and have escalated to therapy with immunomodulators or advanced therapies, the AGA suggests stopping 5-aminosalicylates. Finally, in adult outpatients with moderate-severe UC, the AGA suggests early use of advanced therapies and/or immunomodulator therapy, rather than gradual step-up after failure of 5-aminosalicylates. The panel also proposed key implementation considerations for optimal use of these medications and identified several knowledge gaps and areas for future research.

This guideline provides a comprehensive, patient-centered approach to the pharmacological management of patients with moderate-to-severe UC.

Medication holidays in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) offer a potential means to balance disease management, costs, and quality of life. This concept is increasingly relevant in light of the chronic nature of IBD, the cumulative side effects associated with long-term pharmacotherapy, and the evolving treatment landscape that now includes a large armamentarium of effective induction, maintenance, and rescue therapies paired with disease monitoring tools that enable early intervention.

This review critically examines the rationale, implementation, and risks of medication holidays in IBD. Recent evidence is reviewed to help guide the risks of relapse involved with cessation of therapy. The selection criteria for patients, the necessary monitoring protocols, and strategies for managing potential relapses are outlined.

Despite the potential benefits, medication holidays in IBD involve significant risks and require careful patient selection and active management. Current research highlights a need for improved predictive models and a deeper understanding of patient-specific outcomes and consequences. The future of medication holidays will depend heavily on advancements in noninvasive monitoring technologies and more personalized approaches to therapy. Ultimately, establishing clearer guidelines for safely conducting medication holidays will be crucial in integrating this strategy into routine clinical practice.

Combination therapy with an immunomodulator (IMM) and an anti-TNF is commonly recommended in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) patients. However, little is known about relapse rates after therapeutic de-escalation. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of relapse in a cohort of UC and CD patients with long-standing clinical remission after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to identify predictive factors for relapse.

This retrospective study included patients with UC or CD on combination therapy and clinical remission for at least 6 months. IMM or anti-TNF was stopped upon physician decision. Primary objective was to evaluate the relapse rates after discontinuation of IMM or anti-TNF and to analyze predictors of relapse.

The study included 88 patients, 48 patients (54.5%) discontinued IMM and 40 (45.5%) anti-TNF. During follow-up, relapse rates were 16.7% and 52.5% in the IMM discontinuation group and anti-TNF discontinuation group, respectively (p<0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that anti-TNF discontinuation (HR=3.01; 95% CI=1.22-7.43) and ileal CD location (HR=2.36; 95% CI=1.02-5.47) were predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor (HR=0.32; 95% CI=0.11-0.90). Reintroduction of anti-TNF upon relapse was effective and safe.

Anti-TNF discontinuation led to significantly higher relapse rates compared to IMM discontinuation in UC and CD patients on combination therapy. Anti-TNF discontinuation and ileal CD location were identified as predictive factors for relapse while inflammatory CD phenotype was a protective factor. Retreatment after anti-TNF discontinuation was effective and safe.

The timely introduction and adjustment of the appropriate drug in accordance with previously well-defined treatment goals is the foundation of the approach in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The therapeutic approach is still evolving in terms of the mechanism of action but also in terms of the possibility of maintaining remission. In patients with achieved long-term remission, the question of de-escalation or discontinuation of therapy arises, considering the possible side effects and economic burden of long-term therapy. For each of the drugs used in IBD (5-aminosalycaltes, immunomodulators, biological drugs, small molecules) there is a risk of relapse. Furthermore, studies show that more than 50% of patients who discontinue therapy will relapse. Based on the findings of large studies and meta-analysis, relapse of disease can be expected in about half of the patients after therapy withdrawal, in case of monotherapy with aminosalicylates, immunomodulators or biological therapy. However, longer relapse-free periods are recorded with withdrawal of medication in patients who had previously been on combination therapies immunomodulators and anti-tumor necrosis factor. It needs to be stressed that randomised clinical trials regarding withdrawal from medications are still lacking. Before making a decision on discontinuation of therapy, it is important to distinguish potential candidates and predictive factors for the possibility of disease relapse. Fecal calprotectin level has currently been identified as the strongest predictive factor for relapse. Several other predictive factors have also been identified, such as: High Crohn's disease activity index or Harvey Bradshaw index, younger age (< 40 years), longer disease duration (> 40 years), smoking, young age of disease onset, steroid use 6-12 months before cessation. An important factor in the decision to withdraw medication is the success of re-treatment with the same or other drugs. The decision to discontinue therapy must be based on individual approach, taking into account the severity, extension, and duration of the disease, the possibility of side adverse effects, the risk of relapse, and patient's preferences.

Refractory Crohn's disease, defined as ongoing inflammation despite the trial of multiple advanced therapies, impacts a number of individuals with Crohn's disease, and leads to significant burden in quality of life and cost. Interventions such as early implementation of advanced therapies, optimization of current therapies prior to switching to an alternative, as well as understanding the overlapping pathophysiology between immune-mediated disorders, however, can help shift the current landscape and reduce the number of patients with refractory disease. As such, in this review we summarize the key takeaways of the latest research in the management of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease, focusing on maximization of our currently available medications, while also exploring topics such as combination advanced therapies. We also describe evidence for emerging and alternative therapeutic modalities, including fecal microbiota transplant, exclusive enteral feeding, hyperbaric oxygen, stem cell therapy, bone marrow transplant, and posaconazole, with a focus on both the potential impact and specific indications for each.

Maintenance treatment for ulcerative colitis may be discontinued for multiple reasons. This post hoc analysis assessed the efficacy and safety of re-treatment with filgotinib, an oral, once-daily, Janus kinase 1 preferential inhibitor, in the phase 2b/3 SELECTION trial and its long-term extension [LTE] study in ulcerative colitis.

Partial Mayo Clinic Score [pMCS] response and remission were evaluated in patients who received induction with filgotinib 200 mg [FIL200] or 100 mg [FIL100], were randomized to treatment withdrawal [placebo] during maintenance, and following disease worsening, were re-treated with open-label FIL200 in the LTE study. Factors were evaluated for association with pMCS remission at LTE week 12, and safety outcomes were reported.

Analyses included 86 patients [FIL200: n = 51; FIL100: n = 35]. Median time to disease worsening following treatment withdrawal was 15.1 weeks (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.1-18.7) for FIL200-induced patients and 9.6 weeks [95% CI: 6.3-12.0] for FIL100-induced patients. Three-quarters [75%] of patients achieved a pMCS response within 4-5 weeks of re-treatment in both groups. At LTE week 48, pMCS remission was achieved by 45.1% and 51.4% of FIL200- and FIL100-induced patients, respectively. Factors independently associated with restoring efficacy included no concomitant use of corticosteroids at induction baseline, and high albumin levels, pMCS remission, and endoscopic score at maintenance baseline. No new safety signals were reported among re-treated patients.

In induction responders, re-treatment with FIL200 following temporary withdrawal from therapy restores response and/or remission in the majority of patients within 12 weeks. Re-treatment is well-tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT02914522, NCT02914535.

Despite its efficacy, rational guidance for starting/stopping first-line biologic treatment in individual paediatric Crohn's disease [CD] patients is needed. We assessed how serum immune profiles before and after first-line infliximab [FL-IFX] or conventional [CONV] induction therapy associate with disease remission at week 52.

Pre- [n = 86], and 10-14-week post-treatment [n = 84] sera were collected from patients with moderate-to-severe paediatric CD in the TISKids trial, randomized to FL-IFX [n = 48; five 5-mg/kg infusions over 22 weeks] or CONV [n = 43; exclusive enteral nutrition or oral prednisolone]; both groups received azathioprine maintenance. The relative concentrations of 92 inflammatory proteins were determined with Olink Proteomics; fold changes [FC] with |log2FC| > 0.5 after false discovery rate adjustment were considered significant.

FL-IFX modulated a larger number of inflammatory proteins and induced stronger suppression than CONV; 18/30 proteins modulated by FL-IFX were not regulated by CONV. Hierarchical clustering based on IFX-modulated proteins at baseline revealed two clusters of patients: CD-hi patients had significantly higher concentrations of 23/30 IFX-modulated proteins [including oncostatin-M, TNFSF14, HGF and TGF-α], and higher clinical disease activity, C-reactive protein and blood neutrophils at baseline than CD-lo patients. Only 24% of CD-hi FL-IFX-treated patients maintained remission without escalation at week 52 vs 58% of CD-lo FL-IFX-treated patients. Similarly, 6% of CD-hi CONV-treated patients achieved remission vs 20% of CONV-treated CD-lo patients. Clustering based on immune profiles post-induction therapy did not relate to remission at week 52.

FL-IFX leads to stronger reductions and modulates more immune proteins than CONV. Stratification on pre-treatment profiles of IFX-modulated proteins directly relates to maintenance of remission without treatment escalation.

NCT02517684.

Immune-mediated inflammatory diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, peripheral and/or axial spondyloarthritis, Crohn's disease, and ulcerative colitis, are characterized by molecular and cellular changes in the immune system. Due to the systemic nature of these diseases, organs such as the liver or cardiovascular system are often affected by the inflammatory process. Tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitor therapy reduces the activation of pro-inflammatory signaling cascades, mitigates the chronic inflammatory process by restoring cellular balance, and alleviates clinical consequences, such as pain and tissue damage.

Discontinuation of anti-tumor necrosis factor-α treatment (anti-TNF) (infliximab and adalimumab) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is associated with a high relapse risk that may be influenced by endoscopic activity at the time of stopping. We assessed the relapse rate after anti-TNF withdrawal in patients with endoscopic healing and studied predictors of relapse including the depth of endoscopic healing.

This was a multicenter, prospective study in adult patients with Crohn's disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), or IBD-unclassified (IBDU), with ≥6 months of corticosteroid-free clinical remission (confirmed at baseline) and endoscopic healing (Mayo <2/SES-CD <5 without large ulcers), who discontinued anti-TNF between 2018 and 2020 in the Netherlands. We performed Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses to assess the relapse rate and evaluate potential predictors: partial (Mayo 1/SES-CD 3-4) versus complete (Mayo 0/SES-CD 0-2) endoscopic healing, anti-TNF trough levels, and immunomodulator and/or mesalamine use.

Among 81 patients (CD: n = 41, 51%) with a median follow-up of 2.0 years (interquartile range, 1.6-2.1), 40 patients (49%) relapsed. Relapse rates in CD and UC/IBDU patients were comparable. At 12 months, 70% versus 35% of patients with partial versus complete endoscopic healing relapsed, respectively (adjusted hazard rate [aHR], 3.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.43-7.50). Mesalamine use was associated with fewer relapses in UC/IBDU patients (aHR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.01-0.67). Thirty patients restarted anti-TNF, and clinical remission was regained in 73% at 3 months.

The relapse risk was high after anti-TNF withdrawal in IBD patients with endoscopic healing, but remission was regained in most cases after anti-TNF reintroduction. Complete endoscopic healing and mesalamine treatment in UC/IBDU patients decreased the risk of relapse.

The primary aim of this study was to determine the proportion of pediatric Crohn disease (CD) subjects in sustained drug-free remission 52 weeks after stopping pharmacological therapy. We also aimed to explore the effects of the Crohn Disease Exclusion Diet (CDED) and microbiome composition on remission.

We performed a prospective study following 18 CD patients ages 13-21 years in deep clinical remission withdrawing from immunomodulator (n = 7) or anti-TNFα (n = 11) monotherapy at two tertiary care centers. Stool for calprotectin and microbiome analyses was collected over 52 weeks. Participants followed either the CDED or free diet after drug withdrawal. The primary endpoint was sustained relapse-free drug-free remission (calprotectin <250 µg/g) at 52 weeks.

Seventeen participants were followed through 52 weeks with 11 (64.7%) in sustained remission. There was no improvement in remission among participants following the CDED (5/9; 55.6%), P = 0.63. By 104 weeks, only 8 (47.1 %) participants remained off immunosuppressive therapies. Analysis of shotgun metagenomic sequence data revealed that taxonomic and gene function abundance in the gut microbiome was relatively stable for participants in remission and relapse. However, a predictive model incorporating gut microbial gene pathway abundance for amino sugar/nucleotide sugar metabolism and galactose metabolism from baseline samples predicted relapse at 52 weeks with 80% accuracy.

After withdrawal of immunomodulator or anti-TNFα monotherapy among a small cohort of pediatric CD subjects in deep remission, nearly 65% sustained remission at 52 weeks. Baseline microbiome alterations predicted relapse. Large prospective studies are needed to better understand outcomes after treatment de-escalation.

Biologic Treatment Withdrawal: Two Sides of a CoinThe advent of monoclonal antibody (biologic) therapies ushered in a wave of highly effective yet relatively safe treatments for inflammatory bowel diseases; their use predicated on assertively controlling intestinal inflammation to reduce disease-related complications has accelerated their adoption in clinical practice.1-3 However, despite the overall advantages of biologic therapies, patients often express hesitation initiating them. The concern is for fear of adverse effects (particularly, infections and malignancy), inconvenience, cost, and the psychologic barrier of having to receive an intravenous or injectable drug "for the rest of my life."

To examine the long-term efficacy and side effects of antitumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) therapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD), the need for surgery and the clinical outcome after discontinuing anti-TNF therapy.

Data were collected from the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-TNF register at Østfold Hospital Trust. Clinical and sociodemographic data were recorded for patients initiating anti-TNF therapy from January 2000 until December 2011. Follow-up was conducted until December 2017.

Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 40/154 (26%) patients at the last follow-up (median follow-up time 10 years). A total of 40 (26%) patients had to discontinue treatment due to serious side effects, and malignancy was recorded in 10 (6.5%) patients. Surgical resection was performed in 55 (36%) patients during follow-up. Patients with Montreal phenotype B2 before anti-TNF therapy were estimated to have a 2.54-fold greater risk of surgery than patients with phenotype B1 (p = .001). Of those with phenotype B1 before anti-TNF therapy, 19 (24%) of them developed stenosis in need of surgical resection ('phenotype migration'). In patients followed up after discontinuing anti-TNF therapy (n = 89, median observational time six years), CR was achieved in most patients.

Long-term complete remission was achieved in only one in four patients receiving anti-TNF therapy, and one in four patients had to discontinue therapy due to side effects. Despite anti-TNF therapy, one in four patients with a baseline luminal disease phenotype needed subsequent surgical resection.

Tools for stratification of relapse risk of Crohn's disease (CD) after anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) therapy cessation are needed. We aimed to validate a previously developed prediction model from the diSconTinuation in CrOhn's disease patients in stable Remission on combined therapy with Immunosuppressants (STORI) trial, and to develop an updated model.

Cohort studies were selected that reported on anti-TNF cessation in 30 or more CD patients in remission. Individual participant data were requested for luminal CD patients and anti-TNF treatment duration of 6 months or longer. The discriminative ability (concordance-statistic [C-statistic]) and calibration (agreement between observed and predicted risks) were explored for the STORI model. Next, an updated prognostic model was constructed, with performance assessment by cross-validation.

This individual participant data meta-analysis included 1317 patients from 14 studies in 11 countries. Relapses after anti-TNF cessation occurred in 632 of 1317 patients after a median of 13 months. The pooled 1-year relapse rate was 38%. The STORI prediction model showed poor discriminative ability (C-statistic, 0.51). The updated model reached a moderate discriminative ability (C-statistic, 0.59), and included clinical symptoms at cessation (hazard ratio [HR], 2.2; 95% CI, 1.2-4), younger age at diagnosis (HR, 1.5 for A1 (age at diagnosis ≤16 years) vs A2 (age at diagnosis 17 - 40 years); 95% CI, 1.11-1.89), no concomitant immunosuppressants (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.18-172), smoking (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67), second line anti-TNF (HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.01-1.69), upper gastrointestinal tract involvement (HR, 1.3 for L4 vs non-L4; 95% CI, 0.96-1.79), adalimumab (HR, 1.22 vs infliximab; 95% CI, 0.99-1.50), age at cessation (HR, 1.2 per 10 years younger; 95% CI, 1-1.33), C-reactive protein (HR, 1.04 per doubling; 95% CI, 1.00-1.08), and longer disease duration (HR, 1.07 per 5 years; 95% CI, 0.98-1.17). In subanalysis, the discriminative ability of the model improved by adding fecal calprotectin (C-statistic, 0.63).

This updated prediction model showed a reasonable discriminative ability, exceeding the performance of a previously published model. It might be useful to guide clinical decisions on anti-TNF therapy cessation in CD patients after further validation.

BACKGROUND: Whether infliximab therapy can be successfully discontinued after patients with Crohn’s disease have attained sustained, clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission is unknown. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study of infliximab in patients with Crohn’s disease who were in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission after standard infliximab maintenance therapy for at least 1 year. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to continue infliximab therapy or to receive matching placebo for 48 weeks. The primary end point was time to relapse. RESULTS: This study randomly assigned 115 patients to either the infliximab-continuation group or to the infliximab-discontinuation group. No relapses were observed among the 59 patients continuing infliximab, whereas 23 of 56 patients discontinuing infliximab experienced relapse. Time to relapse was significantly shorter among patients who discontinued infliximab than among those who continued infliximab (hazard ratio, 0.080; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.035 to 0.186; P<0.001). At the end of the trial at week 48, relapse-free survival was 100% in the infliximab-continuation group and 51% in the infliximab-discontinuation group. The key secondary end point, time to loss of remission, was significantly shorter among patients discontinuing infliximab therapy than those continuing infliximab (hazard ratio, 0.025; 95% CI, 0.003 to 0.187; P<0.001). No unexpected adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of infliximab for patients with Crohn’s disease receiving long-term infliximab therapy and in clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission leads to a considerable risk of relapse. (Funded by the Nordic Trial Alliance [NordForsk], the Medical Fund of the Danish Regions [Regionernes Medicin og Behandlingspulje], the Danish Colitis-Crohn Association, and the A.P. Moller Foundation; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01817426; EudraCT number, 2012-002702-51.)

Higher infliximab trough levels (TLs) correlate with better clinical, inflammatory, and endoscopic outcomes among inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. Although standard scheduled infliximab therapy regimen consists of infusions at pre-defined time-points (weeks 0, 2, 6, and every 8 weeks), short-period deviations from therapeutic schedule are common in 'real life', but the pharmacokinetic impact of these deviations has not been explored. In this study, we aim to determine whether short-period deviations from infusion schedule affect infliximab-TL.

A retrospective analysis of all IBD patients receiving infliximab maintenance therapy every 8 weeks was conducted in a tertiary medical center. Patients with anti-drug antibodies, deliberate interval shortening and <3 sequential maintenance sera available were excluded. Associations between time since last infusion and TL were studied. Statistical analysis was performed using generalized estimating equations.

Out of over 10,000 sera, 2088 sera of 302 maintenance period stable infliximab-therapy-patients met inclusion criteria (median TL 4.1 μg/mL, interquartile range (IQR) 2.3-6.5 μg/mL). A delay beyond 3 days in infusion schedule (n > 59 days since last infusion) was found to significantly affect TL (mean difference in TL 0.9 μg/mL, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-1.9 μg/mL, p < 0.04). Furthermore, among patients with delayed infusions, 80% had TL below 5 μg/mL, in comparison to 55% of patients who were not late (odds ratio (OR): 2.81, CI: 2.02-3.92, p < 0.0001).

Real-life delays of ⩽3 days from infusion protocol can probably be allowed. Delays >3 days culminate in measurable decrease of TL, although effect on clinical outcome is unclear. This needs to be taken into account when interpreting drug-level test results.

A total of 2088 sera of 302 maintenance period inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients treated with infliximab were analyzed, to assess effect of small deviations from infusion schedule on TLs. A significant decline in patients' trough level (TL) was noted as early as 3 days after scheduled infusion.

The aim of the present study was to investigate outcomes of anti-TNF-alpha (ATA) withdrawal in selected pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease who achieved clinical remission and mucosal and histological healing (MH and HH).

A retrospective analysis was performed on children and adolescents affected by Crohn disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) who were followed up at 2 tertiary referral centers from 2008 through 2018. The main outcome measure was clinical relapse rates after ATA withdrawal.

One hundred seventy patients received scheduled ATA treatment; 78 patients with CD and 56 patients with UC underwent endoscopic reassessment. We found that MH was achieved by 32 patients with CD (41%) and 30 patients with UC (53.6%); 26 patients with CD (33.3%) and 22 patients with UC (39.3%) achieved HH. The ATA treatment was suspended in 45 patients, 24 affected by CD and 21 by UC, who all achieved concurrently complete MH (Simplified Endoscopic Score for CD, 0; Mayo score, 0, respectively) and HH. All the patients who suspended ATA shifted to an immunomodulatory agent or mesalazine. In contrast, 17 patients, 8 with CD and 9 with UC, continued ATA because of growth needs, the persistence of slight endoscopic lesions, and/or microscopic inflammation. Thirteen out of 24 patients with CD who suspended ATA experienced disease relapse after a median follow-up time of 29 months, whereas no recurrence was observed among the 9 patients with CD who continued treatment (P = 0.05). Among the patients with UC, there were no significant differences in relapse-free survival among those who discontinued ATA and those who did not suspend treatment (P = 0.718).

Despite the application of rigid selection criteria, ATA cessation remains inadvisable in CD. In contrast, in UC, the concurrent achievement of MH and HH may represent promising selection criteria to identify patients in whom treatment withdrawal is feasible.

Few studies have demonstrated treatment strategies about the duration and cessation of medications in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). We investigated factors affecting clinical relapse after infliximab (IFX) or azathioprine (AZA) withdrawal in pediatric patients with CD on combination therapy. Pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe CD receiving combination therapy were analyzed retrospectively and factors associated with clinical relapse were investigated. Discontinuation of IFX or AZA was performed in patients who sustained clinical remission (CR) for at least two years and achieved deep remission. A total of 75 patients were included. Forty-four patients (58.7%) continued with combination therapy and 31 patients (41.3%) discontinued AZA or IFX (AZA withdrawal 10, IFX withdrawal 15, both withdrawal 6). Cox proportional-hazards regression and statistical internal validation identified three factors associated with clinical relapse: IFX cessation (hazard ratio; HR 2.982, P = 0.0081), IFX TLs during maintenance therapy (HR 0.581, P = 0.003), 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) level (HR 0.978, P < 0.001). However, AZA cessation was not associated with clinical relapse (P = 0.9021). Even when applied in pediatric patients who met stringent criteria, IFX cessation increased the relapse risk. However, withdrawal of AZA could be contemplated in pediatric patients with CD who have sustained CR for at least 2 years and achieved deep remission.

In newly diagnosed paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD), infliximab (IFX) is initiated once exclusive enteral nutrition (EEN), corticosteroid and immunomodulator therapies have failed. We aimed to investigate whether starting first-line IFX (FL-IFX) is more effective to achieve and maintain remission than conventional treatment.

In this multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial, untreated patients with a new diagnosis of CD (3-17 years old, weighted Paediatric CD Activity Index score (wPCDAI) >40) were assigned to groups that received five infusions of 5 mg/kg IFX at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14 and 22 (FL-IFX), or EEN or oral prednisolone (1 mg/kg, maximum 40 mg) (conventional). The primary outcome was clinical remission on azathioprine, defined as a wPCDAI <12.5 at week 52, without need for treatment escalation, using intention-to-treat analysis.

100 patients were included, 50 in the FL-IFX group and 50 in the conventional group. Four patients did not receive treatment as per protocol. At week 10, a higher proportion of patients in the FL-IFX group than in the conventional group achieved clinical (59% vs 34%, respectively, p=0.021) and endoscopic remission (59% vs 17%, respectively, p=0.001). At week 52, the proportion of patients in clinical remission was not significantly different (p=0.421). However, 19/46 (41%) patients in the FL-IFX group were in clinical remission on azathioprine monotherapy without need for treatment escalation vs 7/48 (15%) in the conventional group (p=0.004).

FL-IFX was superior to conventional treatment in achieving short-term clinical and endoscopic remission, and had greater likelihood of maintaining clinical remission at week 52 on azathioprine monotherapy.

ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT02517684).

This paper is an update of the diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of the National Consultant for Gastroenterology and the Polish Society of Gastroenterology from 2012. It contains 46 recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment, both pharmacological and surgical, of Crohn's disease in adults. The guidelines were developed by a group of experts appointed by the Polish Society of Gastroenterology and the National Consultant in the field of Gastroenterology. The methodology related to the GRADE methodology was used to assess the quality and strength of the available recommendations. The degree of expert support for the proposed statement, assessment of the quality of evidence and the strength of the recommendation was assessed on a 6-point Likert scale. Voting results, quality and strength ratings with comments are included with each statement.

Evidence-based guidelines have been developed outlining the concomitant use of anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) agents and immunomodulators including azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) in both adult and pediatric populations. However, there exists a paucity of data guiding evidence-based strategies for their withdrawal in pediatric patients in sustained remission. This narrative review focuses on the available pediatric evidence on this question in the context of what is known from the larger body of evidence available from adult studies. The objective is to provide clarity and practical guidance around who, what, when, and how to step down pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) from combination immunotherapy. Outcomes following withdrawal of either of the two most commonly used anti-TNF therapies [infliximab (IFX) or adalimumab (ADA)], or immunomodulator therapies, from a combination regimen are examined. Essentially, a judicious approach must be taken to identify a significant minority of patients who would benefit from treatment rationalization. We conclude that step-down to anti-TNF (rather than immunomodulator) monotherapy after at least 6 months of sustained clinical remission is a viable option for a select group of pediatric patients. This group includes those with good indicators of mucosal healing, low or undetectable anti-TNF trough levels, lack of predictors for severe disease, and no prior escalation of anti-TNF therapy. Transmural healing and specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing are some of the emerging targets and tools that may help facilitate improved outcomes in this process. We also propose a simplified evidence-based schema that may assist in this decision-making process. Further pediatric clinical studies are required to develop the evidence base for decision-making in this area.

Anti-TNF antibodies were the first biologic treatment option for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

To assess length of treatment persistence of first anti-TNF therapy and influencing factors used in the standard care of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Single-centre, retrospective study from a register including patients who received anti-TNF therapy in the last 20 years at the study centre. Kaplan-Meier analysis with log-rank test was used to describe treatment persistence. With multivariable Cox regression analysis, risk factors for treatment failure were investigated.

Five hundred thirty-eight patients (CD, Crohn's disease: 367, UC, ulcerative colitis: 147, inflammatory bowel disease unclassified: 24) with a median follow-up of 8.1 years were included. Median (95% confidence interval) treatment persistence in the total cohort was 2.3 years (28 [22, 38] months), and nearly half of patients withdrew from treatment within 2 years. Male patients were treated longer than females (male: 37 [25, 48] months, female: 23 [14, 33] months, P = 0.002). Treatment persistence was longer in CD compared to UC (CD: 39 [30, 50] months, UC: 13 [9, 19] months, P < 0.001), and patients with CD remained longer on adalimumab than on infliximab treatment (adalimumab: 67 [55, 95] months, infliximab: 19 [14, 31] months, P < 0.001). Treatment failure (52%) and side effects (25%) were the most common reasons for withdrawal from therapy; 14% withdrew due to remission. Female sex was identified as independent predictor for treatment failure in UC (hazard ratio [CI]: 1.73 [1.02-2.92], P = 0.04).

Long-term treatment persistence of first anti-TNF therapy was limited in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases, primarily due to treatment failure and side effects.

Despite current guidelines, the optimal treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains challenging. The available medications are not without risk and there is not a single correct treatment regimen for every patient. Personalizing treatment and selecting the most appropriate therapy is crucial for optimal response, remission, quality of life, and healthcare utilization. Biologics, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α medications, are widely used in the induction and maintenance of disease remission in patients with IBD. Similarly, immunomodulators, including thiopurines and methotrexate, are traditionally popular for the maintenance of remission. In this manuscript, we review the use of biologic monotherapy vs. combination therapy with immunomodulators for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease. We examine overall remission, immunogenicity and adverse effects, mainly serious infections and malignancy, in an effort to help guide treatment decisions and weigh the risks and benefits of biologic monotherapy vs. combination therapy.