This retrospective, multicenter cohort study aimed to determine whether cancer cachexia serves as a biomarker for determining the most effective treatment for patients having non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with high programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) alone or combined with chemotherapy (ICI/chemotherapy). We included 411 patients with advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 tumor proportion score of ≥50%. The patients were treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI/chemotherapy. Cancer cachexia was defined as a weight loss of >5% of the total body weight or a body mass index of <20 kg/m2 coupled with an additional weight loss of >2% within 6 months before starting treatment. Eighty-five (21%) patients met the cancer cachexia criteria. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with cachexia than in those without cachexia in both the pembrolizumab monotherapy group (17.2 vs. 35.8 months, p < 0.001) and the ICI/chemotherapy group (27.0 months vs. not reached, p = 0.044). However, after stratifying by cancer cachexia status, no significant difference in OS was observed between the pembrolizumab monotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy groups, regardless of cachexia. In conclusion, ICI/chemotherapy offers limited benefits for NSCLC patients with high PD-L1 expression and concurrent cancer cachexia. Considering the frailty associated with cachexia, ICI monotherapy may be preferred to ICI/chemotherapy for these patients. New interventions that can better address the negative prognostic impact of cachexia in patients treated using ICIs with or without chemotherapy remain warranted.

Pembrolizumab alone is a first-line therapeutic option for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ≥ 50% PD-L1 expression, but few data are available for elderly patients, specifically octogenarians.

This retrospective, multicenter study included all consecutive patients with metastatic NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50% treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy between May 2017 and November 2019. Information was collected from medical files with local evaluation of therapeutic response and progression-free survival (PFS).

Among the 844 patients included, 73 (8.4%) were ≥ 80 (median: 82) years old, 74% men, 23.3% with ECOG-PS ≥ 2, 26% had ≥ 5% weight loss, PD-L1 50%-75%/≥ 75%: 45.2%/46.6%, respectively, with significantly more nonsmokers and (17.4% vs. 5.6%, P = .0002) and fewer adenocarcinomas (57.5% vs. 70.8%, P = .0217) than those < 80 years. After median follow-up of 45.7 (95% CI: 43.0-49.1) months, respective median overall survival (OS) for octogenarians versus younger patients lasted 12.0 (95% CI: 7.7-16.2) versus 23.9 (95% CI: 19.5-27.4) months (P = .0002), and median PFS for 5.0 (95% CI: 2.8-9.2) versus 8.3 (95% CI: 7.2-9.8) months (P = .039). Their respective objective response rates did not differ significantly: 42% (95% CI: 24-60) vs. 49% (95% CI: 43-54).

Based on the results of this large multicenter population, first-line pembrolizumab efficacy against NSCLCs expressing ≥ 50% PD-L1 in octogenarians seems inferior to that obtained in younger patients. The higher percentage of nonsmokers and fewer adenocarcinomas could partially explain that finding.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in China, and pembrolizumab shows differential efficacy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with different PD-L1 expression levels.

To assess the cost-effectiveness of PD-L1 testing associated with pembrolizumab for first-line treatment of NSCLC from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system.

Over a lifetime horizon, a three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of PD-L1 testing and no PD-L1 testing. In the PD-L1 testing group, patients were stratified by PD-L1 tumor proportion score ≥ 50%, 1-49%, or < 1% and received pembrolizumab monotherapy, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, or chemotherapy alone, respectively. In the non-PD-L1 testing group, all patients received pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy. Model inputs were obtained from published literature and a healthcare price database, and clinical outcomes from two randomized clinical trials were used. The net monetary benefit (NMB) was estimated for the PD-L1 testing group versus the non-PD-L1 testing group. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses, and scenario analyses were conducted to assess robustness of results.

Using PD-L1 testing to guide treatment led to cost savings of $49,392.7 and a reduction in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 0.234, resulting in a positive NMB of $46,421.7 at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $12,680.8/QALY (GDP per capita in China, 2023). Findings were robust across sensitivity and scenario analyses.

Using PD-L1 testing to guide first-line pembrolizumab treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC is a cost-effective strategy at a WTP threshold of $12,680.8/QALY for China.

Background/Objectives: The Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) has emerged as a promising biomarker for predicting outcomes in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). We assessed whether LIPI, in combination with baseline clinical characteristics, can guide first-line treatment selection between pembrolizumab (P) and pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PCT) in patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% and EGFR/ALK/ROS1 wild-type. Methods: A predictive score was developed using baseline clinical variables, including age, sex, smoking status, and LIPI, in a proof-of-concept cohort (n = 241). This model was then validated in an independent cohort of 409 patients. OS was compared between patients treated with P versus PCT, stratified by predictive score. Results: In the proof-of-concept cohort, the median OS was 18.3 months for P and 26.6 months for PCT (p = 0.001). In the validation cohort, the median OS was 28.0 months for P and 22.2 months for PCT (p = 0.062). Stratification using the predictive score showed that patients with high scores (3-5) had improved OS with PCT compared to P (31.2 vs. 25.5 months, p = 0.001), while those with low scores (0-2) derived similar benefits from both treatments. Conclusions: This LIPI-based predictive score may assist in identifying aNSCLC patients who derive greater benefit from chemo-immunotherapy over immunotherapy. Its simplicity and clinical relevance support integration into treatment decision-making, pending prospective validation.

The frontline treatment of metastatic lung adenocarcinoma with high Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (≥50%) includes immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) either as monotherapy or combined with chemotherapy. The added benefit of chemotherapy in this context lacks direct comparison in head-to-head trials. We aimed to compare these two ICI treatment modalities both overall and within relevant patient subgroups in a real-world setting.

This retrospective, nationwide study included 410 individuals diagnosed in Norway during 2017 to 2021 with stage IV non-small-cell lung adenocarcinoma, PD-L1 expression ≥50%, and treated first line with the ICI pembrolizumab, either as monotherapy (n = 317) or in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy (n = 93). We analyzed early (6-month) and overall (3-year) risk of death after treatment initiation using Cox regression, adjusted for and stratified by sex, age, stage, PD-L1 expression, performance status, and education.

Patients treated with combination therapy had a higher median overall survival compared with monotherapy (22.6 months versus 14.2 months), and reduced risk of overall death, although not statistically significant after adjustment [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-1.00]. However, the risk of early death was significantly lower in patients receiving combination therapy, even after adjustment (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.23-0.76). Across most subgroups, patients receiving combination therapy had comparable or superior survival outcomes relative to those receiving monotherapy. Particularly noteworthy were the observed benefits from combination therapy over monotherapy among females, individuals with stage IVB disease, and those with PD-L1 expression exceeding 75%.

Our real-world study demonstrates that combination therapy with ICI and chemotherapy provides superior early survival benefits over monotherapy in PD-L1-high patients. Additionally, certain subgroups showed enhanced overall survival. These findings challenge current treatment practices and underscore the need for further validation to optimize patient selection for monotherapy versus combination therapy, in particular to reassess the role of PD-L1 in treatment decisions.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) offer durable progression-free survival (PFS) benefit in a subset of patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the predictors of long-term PFS (LTPFS) remain unclear.

Advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line ICIs monotherapy at Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute between December 2017 and August 2022 were identified. Predictive value of different characteristics was evaluated in LTPFS (PFS ≥ 24 months) compared with short-term PFS (STPFS, PFS ≤ 3 months). Circulating cytokine levels were evaluated in paired peripheral blood samples collected before and after ICIs treatment.

Among 202 patients identified and 171 included (median follow-up: 41.0 months), 44 (25.7%) experienced LTPFS, associated with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of 81.2%. Squamous NSCLC, intermediate or poor lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) score, and liver metastases, were negatively associated with LTPFS. High tumor mutational burden (TMB, ≥ 10 mutations/megabase) was enriched in LTPFS compared to STPFS (P = 0.002). Patients with both high TMB and PD-L1 demonstrated the greatest survival benefit from first-line ICIs monotherapy (median PFS: 24.5 months, median OS: 67.0 months). Thirty-eight peripheral blood samples were collected before and after ICIs treatment from 10 patients with LTPFS and 9 with STPFS, which revealed increased CCL11 (P = 0.013) and decreased IL1RA (P = 0.001) and IL17A (P = 0.003) levels in LTPFS after ICIs treatment.

Distinct clinical characteristics, including TMB, PD-L1, pathologic subtypes, LIPI score, number of organs involved, metastatic sites, and dynamic circulating cytokines profile features, can distinguish NSCLC patients achieving LTPFS from those with STPFS following first-line ICIs monotherapy.

Since 2017, anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy has been the cornerstone of first-line treatment for stage IV non-oncogene-addicted non-small cell lung cancer. Its phase I development has established that the level of PD-L1 expression by tumor cells is predictive of response rate and progression-free survival. Above 50%, it makes chemotherapy not mandatory, with a median survival for pembrolizumab monotherapy of around 26 months and five-year survival of 32%. Large phase III studies have also validated the combination of anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy and platinum-based chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 level of expression, increasing five-year survival from 10% to 18%. Dual immunotherapy combining anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-(L)1 might be interesting, especially in PD-L1 negative tumors, but is not available in France. Treatment personalization, particularly in the case of PD-L 1 expression >50%, should be based on response and non-response factors to immunotherapy, including patient-related factors such as performans status, age, smoking status, as well as tumor-related factors such as disease aggressiveness, tumor volume, mutational profile, along with concomitant medications. The optimal duration of immunotherapy is uncertain and arbitrarily set at two years. Many options are currently being explored to improve first-line treatment outcomes, as the majority of patients experience resistance to immunotherapy.

Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment paradigm for advanced-stage squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (LUSC), a histological subtype associated with inferior outcomes compared with lung adenocarcinoma. However, only a subset of patients derive durable clinical benefit. In the first-line setting, multiple ICI regimens are available, including anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies as monotherapy, in combination with chemotherapy, or with an anti-CTLA4 antibody with or without chemotherapy. Several important questions persist regarding the optimal regimen for individual patients, particularly how to identify patients who might benefit from adding chemotherapy and/or anti-CTLA4 antibodies to anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies. An urgent need exists for predictive biomarkers beyond PD-L1 to better guide precision oncology approaches. Deeper knowledge of the underlying molecular biology of LUSC and its implications for response to ICIs will be important in this regard. Integration of this knowledge into multi-omics methods coupled with artificial intelligence might enable the development of more robust biomarkers. Finally, several novel therapeutic strategies, including novel ICIs, bispecific antibodies and personalized cancer vaccines, are emerging. Addressing these unresolved questions through innovative clinical trials and translational research will be crucial to further improving the outcomes of patients with LUSC. In this Review, we provide a comprehensive overview of current immunotherapeutic approaches, unresolved challenges and emerging strategies for patients with LUSC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are currently the primary approach for managing NSCLC. However, numerous combination therapies are currently under investigation. Our goal is to investigate the overall efficacy and safety of ICIs and taxane-based chemotherapy.

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis, searching web databases for relevant literature. We limited our eligibility to phase II/III randomized clinical trials involving advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients.

We performed a meta-analysis encompassing nineteen studies derived from sixteen RCTs. For patients with sq-NSCLC PD-L1 ≥ 50%, using ICIs plus taxane significantly improve PFS and OS with HR of 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45-0.74, p < 0.0001) and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.33-0.50, p < 0.00001), respectively. For patients with non-sq NSCLC PD-L1 1-49%, the analysis revealed significant improvement of OS and PFS with HR of 0.64 (95% CI, 0.47-0.88, p = 0.005) and 0.62 (95% CI, 0.47-0.81, p = 0.0004), respectively. For TRAEs of all grades, ICIs plus taxane resulted with no significant difference compared to control group with risk ratio (RR) 1.00 (95% CI 0.99-1.02).

The analysis revealed significant improvement in efficacy of ICIs with taxane in advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients compared with ICI/taxane monotherapy.Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42023447532).

Patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) and especially with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis(IPF) suffer from reduced survival expectation and risk of exacerbations. Lung cancer is a relevant comorbidity in ILD patients and associated with impaired survival.The most frequent ILD among patients with NSCLC (Non-small cell lung cancer) is idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which is associated with an greater decline in lung function and a higher risk of death.The prevalence of lung cancer in patients with ILD is up to 10% and in autopsy studies a prevalence up to 48% has been found.There are no guidelines for patients with lung cancer and ILD. Moreover, no adequate evidence is available.Therefore, we reviewed currently available literature to present an overview of the state of the art.In this review we focus on staging and treatment of the comorbidity of lung cancer and ILD.

This comment discusses the use of PD-L1 as a biomarker to guide treatment decisions for metastatic melanoma.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have transformed the treatment landscape for resectable non-small cell lung cancer. Numerous trials have explored the use of ICIs, either as monotherapy or in combination with other therapies, in the neoadjuvant setting for stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer. Most trials have demonstrated neoadjuvant immunotherapy to be safe and to have remarkable efficacy, with a high pathological response rate and significantly improved event-free survival. This review summarizes the findings of Phase I-III clinical trials investigating various neoadjuvant regimens, including ICI monotherapy, ICI therapy combined with chemotherapy, ICI plus anti-angiogenic therapy, dual ICI therapy, and ICI therapy in combination with radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. We discuss the benefits and outcomes associated with each approach. Despite the results being promising, several unresolved issues remain, including identification of reliable biomarkers, the appropriate duration of therapy, the optimal treatment regimen for tumors with high programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, the false-negative pathological complete response rate, and the role of digital pathology in assessing the response to treatment. Resistance to immunotherapy, in particular, remains a significant barrier to effective use of ICIs. Given the critical influence of the tumor microenvironment (TME) on the response to treatment, we examine the characteristics of the TME in both responsive and resistant tumors as well as the dynamic changes that occur in the TME in response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy. We also summarize the mechanisms underlying T cell responses following neoadjuvant immunotherapy and provide a perspective on strategies to enhance the understanding of tumor heterogeneity, therapy-driven TME remodeling, and overcoming resistance to therapy. Finally, we propose future directions for advancements in personalized neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

The necessity of platinum-doublet chemotherapy in first-line immunotherapy for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsqNSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression on less than 50% of tumor cells remains poorly investigated. Biomarkers predicting this necessity can guide chemotherapy-free treatment to minimize unnecessary toxicity.

Treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy (ICI-mono), chemotherapy, or combination (ICI-chemo), 790 low PD-L1-expressing nsqNSCLCs (in-house: n=83; public: n=707) were analyzed for development and validation of the interaction score for additional chemotherapy (ISAC). Transcriptomic (public, n=11) and multiplex immunofluorescence data (in-house, n=100) were analyzed to evaluate the immune microenvironment.

ICI-chemo, compared with ICI-mono, tended to prolong progression-free survival (PFS; HR=0.72, p=0.004) and overall survival (OS; HR=0.77, p=0.071) as first-line therapy in low PD-L1-expressing nsqNSCLCs. The added value of chemotherapy was observed in the ISAC-low subgroup (PFS: HR=0.48, p<0.001; OS: HR=0.53, p=0.001) rather than the ISAC-high subgroup (PFS: HR=1.08, p=0.65; OS: HR=1.14, p=0.56). This predictive utility was independent of tumor mutational burden and PD-L1 expression, indicated by subgroup and multivariable analyses. A high ISAC was associated with adaptive immune resistance reflected by more proinflammatory (eg, CD8+ T cells and M1 macrophages) rather than anti-inflammatory tumor-infiltrating immune cells (eg, M2 macrophages) and high expression of immune checkpoints except for PD-L1 (eg, programmed cell death protein-1).

A high ISAC was identified as a significant predictor for virtually no added value of platinum-doublet chemotherapy for first-line ICI treatment in low PD-L1-expressing nsqNSCLC. Our findings may help refine personalized therapeutic strategies for nsqNSCLC, thereby improving efficacy and reducing undue toxicity.

Treatment for first-line (1L) metastatic non-small cell cancer (mNSCLC) changed with the introduction of immunotherapy. We describe treatment utilization and clinical outcomes in a real-world mNSCLC cohort in a 2.7-million-member state-mandated health provider.

Newly diagnosed mNSCLC patients initiating systemic anti-cancer treatment (January 2017-December 2020) were identified from the National Cancer Registry. Real-world time on treatment (rwToT) was defined as the length of time between the first and last administration date of treatment. Real-world overall survival (rwOS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Outcomes were assessed at a minimum of 6 months' follow-up (cutoff: 30 June 2021).

Among 843 patients, 85% had adenocarcinoma (NSQ) and 15% had squamous cell carcinoma (SQ) histology: of these, 43% and 26% were women, median age was 67 and 69 years, and 55% and 48% had 0-1 ECOG performance status, respectively (missing: 27% and 30%, respectively). Median follow-up for the entire cohort was 27.1 months (95% CI: 24.7-29.6). NSQ patients with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations received PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy (PDM) (N = 147) or combination (PDC) (N = 194) or platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC, N = 133). Median rwToT was 4.5 (95% CI: 3.5-7.6), 5.2 (95% CI: 4.6-7.6), and 2.3 (95% CI: 2.1-3.0) months, respectively; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0-1, rwToT was 9.4 (95% CI: 5.0-20.8), 7.1 (95% CI: 5.0-10.1), and 2.9 (95% CI: 2.2-4.1) months, respectively. Median rwOS from 1L was 12.5 (95% CI: 9.9-17.9), 14.8 (95% CI: 10.5-19.4), and 9.1 (95% CI: 7.1-11.5) months; for the subgroup of patients with ECOG PS 0-1, median rwOS was 25.1 [95% CI: 14.9-not reached (NR)], 17.6 (95% CI: 14.3-NR), and 11.3 (95% CI: 9.2-21.3) months, respectively. For ECOG PS 0-1 and PD-L1 ≥50% patients, median rwOS was 25.1 months (95% CI: 13.9-NR) and NR for PDM and PDC, respectively. For ECOG PS 0-1 and PD-L1 <50% patients, median rwOS was 14.3 (95% CI: 10.1-NR) and 11.2 (95% CI: 9.1-21.3) months for PDC and PBC, respectively.

Our real-world data support the benefit of single-agent PD-1 inhibitor monotherapy for patients with PD-L1 high expression or PD-1 inhibitor combination for all patients diagnosed with mNSCLC with no known EGFR/ALK/ROS1 aberrations, initiating 1L treatment.

The association between depth of response (DpR) and treatment outcomes has been documented across various types of cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment is globally used as first-line treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 50%. However, in this population, the significance of DpR is not elucidated. Patients with advanced NSCLC and PD-L1 expression ≥ 50% who received ICI-monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy were retrospectively enrolled into this study. Treatment responses were grouped into DpR 'quartiles' by percentage of maximal tumor reduction (Q1 = 1-25%, Q2 = 26-50%, Q3 = 51-75%, and Q4 =  ≥ 76%), and no tumor reduction (NTR). The association between DpR and survival rates were determined using hazard ratios (HR) generated by the Cox proportional hazards model. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to determine survival outcomes. A total of 349 patients were included, of which 214 and 135 patients received pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy, respectively, as first-line treatments. The majority of the patients were male. All DpR quartiles, especially Q4, showed an association with progression-free survival (PFS)/overall survival (OS). In the Q4 cohort, patients who received pembrolizumab had a longer PFS than those who received ICI plus chemotherapy. High DpR was associated with longer PFS and OS, with a more pronounced effect observed with pembrolizumab monotherapy than with ICI plus chemotherapy.

The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with advanced lung cancer is increasing. Despite ongoing studies to predict the efficacy of ICIs, its use in clinical practice remains difficult. Thus, we aimed to discover a predictive marker by analyzing blood cell characteristics and developing a scoring system for patients treated with ICIs.

This was a prospective multicenter study in patients with advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received ICIs as second-line treatment from June 2021 to November 2022. Blood cell parameters in routine blood samples were evaluated using an automated hematology analyzer. Immune checkpoint inhibitor score (IChIS) was calculated as the sum of neutrophil count score and immature granulocyte score.

A total of 143 patients from four institutions were included. The treatment response was as follows: partial response, 8.4%; stable disease, 37.1%; and progressive disease, 44.8%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival after ICI treatment was 3.0 and 8.3 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival in patients with an IChIS of 0 was 4.0 months, which was significantly longer than 1.9 months in patients with an IChIS of 1 and 1.0 month in those with an IChIS of 2 (p=0.001). The median overall survival in patients with an IChIS of 0 was 10.2 months, which was significantly longer than 6.8 and 1.8 months in patients with an IChIS of 1 and 2, respectively (p<0.001).

Baseline IChIS could be a potential biomarker for predicting survival benefit of immunotherapy in NSCLC.

Up to 30% patients newly diagnosed with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with brain metastases. In the absence of oncogenic addiction, first-line immunotherapy, alone or in combination with chemotherapy, is the current standard of care. This review aims to synthesize the available data regarding the efficacy of immunotherapy in these patients, and to discuss the possibility of its being coordinated with local treatments such as radiotherapy.

NSCLC patients with brain metastases appear to have survival benefits with immunotherapy similar to those of NSCLC patients without brain metastases. However, this finding is based on mainly prospective studies having included highly selected patients with pre-treated and stable brain metastases. Several retrospective studies and two prospective single-arm studies have confirmed the intracranial efficacy of immunotherapy, either alone or in combination with chemotherapy.

The indications and optimal timing for cerebral radiotherapy remain subjects of debate. To date, there exists no randomized study assessing the addition of brain radiotherapy to first-line immunotherapy. That said, a recent meta-analysis showed increased intracerebral response when radiotherapy complemented immunotherapy.

For NSCLC patients with brain metastases, the available data suggest a clear benefit of first-line immunotherapy, whether alone or combined with chemotherapy. However, most of these data are drawn from retrospective, non-randomized studies with small sample sizes.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become the recommended first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without driver gene mutations. However, data on the failure patterns of first-line ICIs monotherapy is limited, and the optimal strategy for subsequent treatment remains controversial.

Advanced NSCLC patients receiving first-line ICIs monotherapy at Guangdong Lung Cancer Institute between December 2017 and October 2021 were identified. The progressive sites were recorded to analyze failure patterns. Post-progression survival (PPS) was compared between different treatment regimens.

A total of 121 patients receiving first-line ICIs monotherapy were identified, with a median progression-free survival of 8.6 months. Sixty-five patients had available imaging at diagnosis as well as progressive disease, with 56.9% showing oligoprogression. For those with progression in existing lesions, the most common sites were the liver (77.8%) and lung parenchyma (62.5%), while progression with new lesions frequently occurred in the liver (32.0%). Fifty patients with recorded subsequent treatment were included in the analysis of subsequent treatment patterns. Patients treated with anti-angiogenesis therapy could get better PPS (HR: 0.275, P = 0.013). Isolated oligoprogression occurred most often in the lung parenchyma and intracranial lesions. More than half of these patients continued immunotherapy after local treatment, with a 2.5-year PPS rate of 51.4%.

The liver was the most common site of progression on first-line ICIs monotherapy. Anti-angiogenesis-based therapy might be an optimal regimen at the time of progression. Patients with isolated oligoprogressive could still benefit from immunotherapy after local treatment.

Immunotherapy is an effective treatment strategy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although clinical trials on immunotherapy have provided promising results, real-world research in clinical practice is needed to assess the effectiveness and safety of immunotherapy. The present study aimed to characterize real-world outcomes in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based regimens. The medical records of patients with advanced NSCLC, who were treated with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors, were reviewed for data collection. The primary objectives were to evaluate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Therefore, multiple Cox regression models were used to investigate the predictive factors for survival outcomes. Furthermore, survival curves for PFS and OS were created using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using the log-rank test. The present study included a total of 133 patients with advanced NSCLC who received therapy with ICIs between January 1, 2019 and December 31, 2022. The final follow-up date was August 24, 2023. The median PFS and OS times were 9.8 and 27.2 months, respectively. Univariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that sex, clinical stage, PD-L1 status, previous systemic therapy, and brain and liver metastases were associated with PFS, while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) status, clinical stage, PD-L1 status and brain metastasis were associated with OS. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analysis demonstrated that a PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) of ≥50% was an indicator of favorable PFS and OS. An ECOG performance status score of ≥1 was also associated with poor OS but not with PFS. Furthermore, brain metastasis was an indicator for poor PFS and OS, while liver metastasis was only associated with a poor PFS. Finally, the results of the present study demonstrated that PD-L1 status was an independent predictor for PFS and OS in patients with advanced NSCLC, especially adenocarcinoma, who were treated with ICIs plus chemotherapy. The results also suggested that patients with a PD-L1 TPS of ≥50% could benefit when the aforementioned regimens were administrated as a first-line or later-line therapy.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor (ICI) regimens are approved for first-line treatment of metastatic nononcogene-driven NSCLC. Guidelines do not differentiate which patients with PD-L1 ≥ 50% should receive ICI monotherapy. The clinically validated PROphet NSCLC plasma proteomic-based test is designed to inform this therapeutic decision.

One hundred oncologists were presented with 3 "virtual" metastatic NSCLC cases with PD-L1 scores and asked to recommend an approved first-line regimen. They then watched an online educational webinar on the PROphetNSCLC test. Postwebinar, the same cases were represented with the addition of a PROphet result, and oncologists again recommended a first-line regimen. Responses were compared to assess the impact on first-line treatment selection.

Treatment recommendation changed in 39.6% of PROphet-tested cases, with 93% of physicians changing at least 1 case. In the PD-L1 ≥ 50% group, 89% of physicians changed their recommendation, followed by 77%, in PD-L1 < 1%, and 36% in PD-L1 1% to 49%. ​In the PD-L1 ≥ 50%, PROphet POSITIVE group, the recommendation for ICI monotherapy increased from 60% to 89%. ​For the PD-L1 ≥ 50%, PROphet NEGATIVE group, the recommendation for monotherapy dropped from 60% to 9%. In the PD-L1 < 1%, PROphet NEGATIVE group, 35% of patients were spared toxicity from ICI compared to 11% in PROphet untested cases.

Adding PROphet to PD-L1 expression impacted therapeutic decision making in first-line NSCLC. PROphet identifies those predicted to have an overall survival benefit from ICI monotherapy versus combination versus chemotherapy, improving the probability of efficacy and reducing toxicity for some patients.

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of adverse events (AEs) in breast cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel versus those receiving pembrolizumab or paclitaxel monotherapy, using the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database.

Data were extracted from the FAERS database for breast cancer patients treated with pembrolizumab combined with paclitaxel or with pembrolizumab or paclitaxel monotherapy from Q1 2016 to Q2 2023. Disproportionation analysis was performed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) with corresponding 95% confidence interval (95% CI), the information component (IC), and the lower bound of the information component 95% confidence interval (IC025) to identify potential safety signals.

No significant difference in AEs was observed between the combined treatment group and the pembrolizumab monotherapy group. However, the combined treatment group exhibited a substantial increase in AE risk compared to the paclitaxel monotherapy group. The most significant increases in AE risk were adrenal insufficiency (ROR = 189.94, 95% CI 25.41-1419.7, IC = 3.37, IC025 = 1.59), hypophysitis (ROR = 99.46, 95% CI 12.72-777.4, IC = 3.31, IC025 = 1.44), and myocarditis (ROR = 69.5, 95% CI 8.55-565.23, IC = 3.25, IC025 = 1.33). The time-to-event for combined treatment was 35 (34-70) days, for pembrolizumab was 43 (35-90) days, and for paclitaxel was 42 (37-76) days. The combination therapy group demonstrated significantly shorter intervals to the onset of adrenal insufficiency (p = 0.008), myocarditis (p < 0.001), and immune-related enterocolitis (p = 0.009).

Analysis of the FAERS database indicates that combination therapy significantly elevates the risk of adrenal insufficiency, myocarditis, hypophysitis, and immune-related enterocolitis compared to paclitaxel monotherapy. These findings provide critical insights for clinicians in predicting and managing potential AEs associated with this treatment regimen.

Predictive biomarkers in use for immunotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer are of limited sensitivity and specificity. We analysed the potential of activating KRAS and pathogenic TP53 mutations to provide additional predictive information.

The study cohort included 713 consecutive immunotherapy patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas, negative for actionable genetic alterations. Additionally, two previously published immunotherapy and two surgical patient cohorts were analyzed. Therapy benefit was stratified by KRAS and TP53 mutations. Molecular characteristics underlying KRASmut/TP53mut tumours were revealed by the analysis of TCGA data.

An interaction between KRAS and TP53 mutations was observed in univariate and multivariate analyses of overall survival (Hazard ratio [HR] = 0.56, p = 0.0044 and HR = 0.53, p = 0.0021) resulting in a stronger benefit for KRASmut/TP53mut tumours (HR = 0.71, CI 0.55-0.92). This observation was confirmed in immunotherapy cohorts but not observed in surgical cohorts. Tumour mutational burden, proliferation, and PD-L1 mRNA were significantly higher in TP53-mutated tumours, regardless of KRAS status. Genome-wide expression analysis revealed 64 genes, including CX3CL1 (fractalkine), as specific transcriptomic characteristic of KRASmut/TP53mut tumours.

KRAS/TP53 co-mutation predicts ICI benefit in univariate and multivariate survival analyses and is associated with unique molecular tumour features. Mutation testing of the two genes can be easily implemented using small NGS panels.

Anti-PD(L)-1 inhibition combined with platinum doublet chemotherapy (Chemo-IO) has become the most frequently used standard of care regimen in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The negative impact of antibiotics on clinical outcomes prior to anti-PD(L)-1 inhibition monotherapy (IO) has been demonstrated in multiple studies, but the impact of antibiotic exposure prior to initiation of Chemo-IO is controversial. We assessed antibiotic exposures at two time windows: within 60 days prior to therapy (-60 d window) and within 60 days prior to therapy and 42 days after therapy (-60 + 42d window) in 2028 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with Chemo-IO and IO monotherapy focusing on objective response rate (ORR: rate of partial response and complete response), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). We also assessed impact of antibiotic exposure in an independent cohort of 53 patients. Univariable and multivariable analyses were conducted along with a meta-analysis from similar studies. For the -60 d window, in the Chemo-IO group (N = 769), 183 (24%) patients received antibiotics. Antibiotic exposure was associated with worse ORR (27% vs 40%, p = 0.001), shorter PFS (3.9 months vs. 5.9 months, hazard ratio [HR] 1.35, 95%CI 1.1,1.6, p = 0.0012), as well as shorter OS (10 months vs. 15 months, HR 1.50, 95%CI 1.2,1.8, p = 0.00014). After adjusting for known prognostic factors in NSCLC, antibiotic exposure was independently associated with worse PFS (HR 1.39, 95%CI 1.35,1.7, p = 0.002) and OS (HR 1.61, 95%CI 1.28,2.03, p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained in the -60 + 42d window, and also in an independent cohort. In a meta-analysis of patients with NSCLC treated with Chemo-IO (N = 4) or IO monotherapy (N = 13 studies) antibiotic exposure before treatment was associated with worse OS among all patients (n = 11,351) (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.52, 2.45) and Chemo-IO-treated patients (n = 1201) (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.28, 1.84). Thus, antibiotics exposure prior to Chemo-IO is common and associated with worse outcomes, even after adjusting for other factors. These results highlight the need to implement antibiotic stewardship in routine oncology practice.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the primary form of lung cancer, and the combination of chemotherapy with immunotherapy offers promising treatment options for patients suffering from this disease. However, the emergence of drug resistance significantly limits the effectiveness of these therapeutic strategies. Consequently, it is imperative to devise methods for accurately detecting and evaluating the efficacy of these treatments.

To identify the metabolic signatures associated with neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and chemoimmunotherapy efficacy in NSCLC patients.

In total, 159 NSCLC patients undergoing first-line chemoimmunotherapy were enrolled. We first investigated the characteristics influencing clinical efficacy. Circulating levels of NETs and cytokines were measured by commercial kits. Liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry quantified plasma metabolites, and differential metabolites were identified. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, support vector machine-recursive feature elimination, and random forest algorithms were employed. By using plasma metabolic profiles and machine learning algorithms, predictive metabolic signatures were established.

First, the levels of circulating interleukin-8, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, and NETs were closely related to poor efficacy of first-line chemoimmunotherapy. Patients were classed into a low NET group or a high NET group. A total of 54 differential plasma metabolites were identified. These metabolites were primarily involved in arachidonic acid and purine metabolism. Three key metabolites were identified as crucial variables, including 8,9-epoxyeicosatrienoic acid, L-malate, and bis(monoacylglycerol)phosphate (18:1/16:0). Using metabolomic sequencing data and machine learning methods, key metabolic signatures were screened to predict NET level as well as chemoimmunotherapy efficacy.

The identified metabolic signatures may effectively distinguish NET levels and predict clinical benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in NSCLC patients.

Despite promising outcomes of first-line immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), limited accessibility due to reimbursement was remain the problem in low to middle income countries. This study aimed to evaluate real-world effectiveness of immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC in Northern Thailand.

A retrospective, single-centered cohort, was conducted. Patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent PD-L1 testing (excluding EGFR and ALK mutations) and were treated with immunotherapy or without chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone were included. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events.

A total of 123 patients, of which 21 patients received immunotherapy-based regimen and 102 patients received chemotherapy alone. The median PFS was 11.9 months in immunotherapy-based group compared to 5.93 months in the chemotherapy group, with a. hazard ratio (HR) of 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.68; p = 0.001). Similarly, the median OS was 26.68 months in the immunotherapy-based group and 11.21 months in the chemotherapy group, with HR of 0.42 (95% CI 0.22-0.8; p = 0.009). ORRs were significantly higher in the immunotherapy-based group, with 65% of patients showing a response compared to 32% in the chemotherapy group (p = 0.006).

The result of this real-world study in patients with advanced stage NSCLC indicate that first-line immunotherapy-based regimen was associated with significantly greater PFS, OS, and ORR with a safety profile consistent with pivotal studies.

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors significantly advanced outcomes in both metastatic and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Despite these advancements, the 5-year survival rate remains suboptimal. Even in early-stage disease a significant portion of patients relapse and die from metastatic progression. The integration of immunotherapy in the management of early-stage NSCLC demonstrated promising results, supported by a plethora of positive clinical trials conducted in recent years. Nonetheless, numerous questions persist. In this manuscript we comprehensively review the currently available data on adjuvant, neoadjuvant, and perioperative treatment strategies. We also address the challenges inherent to these approaches from different stakeholders' perspective.

The efficacy and prognosis of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remain unresolved issues. Here, we assessed the treatment characteristics and efficacy of ICIs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using real-world data and evaluated the predictive value of factors, including programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, for the clinical outcome of ICIs in NSCLC.

Analyzed data was collected from hospitalized patients in the West China Hospital of Sichuan University between January 2017 and March 2023. The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized for analyzing real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), while Cox regression models was employed to access the correlation between the efficacy of immunotherapy and sociodemographic characteristics, disease information, and characteristics of ICI treatment.

A total of 545 patients were included in the retrospective study and characteristics of immunotherapy varied significantly among PD-L1 expression groups. The median rwPFS for the entire population was 9.76 months. Subgroup analyses revealed that patients with high PD-L1 expression, early TNM stage, first-line immunotherapy, EGFR wild-type and those who have not received radiotherapy and targeted therapy previously were more likely to have better rwPFS. Furthermore, multivariate Cox regression analyses identified PD-L1 expression, EGFR mutation status and previous radiotherapy as the most influential predictors of the response to ICI treatment.

This study presents the real-world experience of Chinese NSCLC patients undergoing ICI treatment, offering guidance for clinical decision-making based on various patient conditions, preferences, and indications for ICIs, through the evaluation of immunotherapy efficacy and predictors in NSCLC patients.

Patients with advanced NSCLC have heterogenous responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with or without chemotherapy. In NSCLC, the impact of the distribution of metastatic sites and the response to systemic therapy combinations remain poorly understood. In a retrospective cohort study of patients with unresectable stage III/IV NSCLC who received first-line systemic therapy, we sought to assess the association between the site of metastases with patterns of response and progression. Data regarding demographics, tumour characteristics (including site, size, and volume of metastases), treatment, and outcomes were examined at two cancer care centres. The endpoints included organ site-specific response rate, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Two-hundred and eighty-five patients were included in the analysis. In a multivariate analysis, patients with bone metastases had a reduced ORR, PFS, and OS. Primary resistance was also more likely in patients with bone metastases. Patients with bone or liver metastases had a shorter OS when receiving ICIs with or without chemotherapy, but not with chemotherapy alone, suggesting an immunological basis for therapeutic resistance. A directed assessment of the tumour microenvironment in these locations and a deeper understanding of the drivers of organ-specific resistance to immunotherapy are critical to optimise novel combination therapies and sequencing in these patients.

This overview provides a thorough review of current treatment approaches for first-line management of nononcogenic addicted non-small cell lung cancer. We also address pertinent clinical decision-making queries encountered in everyday practice, such as the optimal treatment strategy for PD-L1-high patients, predictive factors for response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) both in terms of patient and cancer characteristics, the potential benefits of dual checkpoint blockade, and the unresolved issue of safe discontinuation strategies for long-term responders. Around one in five patients falls into this latter category while the majority develop either primary or acquired resistance to ICI-based first-line therapy, necessitating effective subsequent lines of treatment. Docetaxel, with or without combination of antiangiogenic agents, serves as the backbone of treatment, although evidence in the post-ICI setting is limited. Given that an inflamed tumor microenvironment (TME) is crucial for ICI responses, targeting the TME in cases of acquired resistance alongside continued ICI administration appears rational, although clinical trials so far have failed to confirm this hypothesis. Antibody-drug conjugates have emerged as a promising treatment modality, offering the potential for reduced toxicity and improved efficacy by targeting specific cancer antigens. Moreover, several chemotherapy-free approaches are currently under investigation for treatment-naïve patients, including alternative ICI and drugs targeting epitopes on both cancer and immune cells.

Factors that could predict which patients will benefit from Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are not fully understood. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of KRAS biomarker in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in relation to clinical characteristics, treatment response and PDL1 expression.

The study included 100 patients with NSCLC who received immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy as 1st line treatment. In biopsy samples, the PDL1 biomarker expression rate and somatic mutations of KRAS gene were determined.

The mean age of the patients was 67 ± 8 years. Patients were all male and 66% were found with adenocarcinoma whereas 34% with squamous cell carcinoma. The KRAS G12C mutation was found with the highest percentage (73%). In the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, patients with PDL1 > 49% in combination with a negative KRAS result had a median overall survival of 40 months compared to patients with a positive KRAS result (9 months, p < 0.05). In addition, patients diagnosed with adenocarcinoma, PDL1 < 49% and negative KRAS result had a median overall survival of 39 months compared to patients with a positive result (28 months, p < 0.05).

Our study suggests that the presence of KRAS mutations in advanced NSCLC patients has a poor prognostic value, regardless of their PDL1 expression values, after receiving immunotherapy as first-line treatment.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) bind to programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand-1 (PD-L1) and Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4), which suppress T-cell function and inhibit their inhibitory function, resulting in T-cell activation. ICI have been approved for a wide range of cancers, including malignant melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, head and neck cancer, Hodgkin's disease, small-cell lung cancer, malignant pleural mesothelioma, gastric cancer, esophageal cancer, breast cancer, uterine cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma, and the number of indications continues to grow. In addition to the treatment of advanced disease, the anti-tumor effect has been demonstrated across disease stages, from locally advanced disease to early-stage operative disease. The treatment of lung cancer is at the forefront of this trend and long-term durable responses and survival benefits in lung cancer have been exhibited that were unimaginable when cytotoxic anticancer agents were the only treatment options. However, treatment efficacy varies greatly from case to case, and no biomarkers have been developed to accurately predict efficacy. In this article, we discuss the past and future of ICI therapy for lung cancer, based on clinical and basic evidence accumulated to-date.

Pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma (PSC) is a rare subtype of lung cancer associated with poor prognosis and resistance to conventional chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), alone or in combination with chemotherapy, were found to have clinical benefits in PSC in recent studies. Nevertheless, because these studies included a small number of patients owing to disease rarity, larger studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ICI-based therapy for PSC.

This multicenter retrospective study evaluated patients with ICI-naive advanced or metastatic PSC who were treated with ICI-based therapy at 25 hospitals in Japan.

A total of 124 patients were evaluated. The overall response rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and median overall survival (OS) were 59.0%, 10.5 months, and 32.8 months, respectively. The PFS and OS rates at 24 months were 35.3% and 51.5%, respectively. Programmed death-ligand 1 expression, concomitant chemotherapy, and the treatment line were not significantly associated with PFS or OS. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were observed in 70 patients (56.5%), including 30 (24.2%) with grade 3 to 5 events. Patients with mild irAEs (grades 1-2) had longer PFS and OS than did those with severe (grades 3-5) or no irAEs. In a multivariate analysis, any-grade irAEs and the absence of liver metastases were independently associated with PFS, whereas any-grade irAEs and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status less than or equal to 1 were independently associated with OS.

ICI-based therapy was found to have promising effectiveness in patients with advanced or metastatic PSC, regardless of programmed death-ligand 1 expression, concomitant chemotherapy, or treatment line.

Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) is the most frequently mutated DNA damage repair gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the molecular correlates of ATM mutations and their clinical implications have not been fully elucidated.

Clinicopathologic and genomic data from 26,587 patients with NSCLC from MD Anderson, public databases, and a de-identified nationwide (US-based) NSCLC clinicogenomic database (CGDB) were used to assess the co-mutation landscape, protein expression, and mutational processes in ATM-mutant tumors. We used the CGDB to evaluate ATM-associated outcomes in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) with or without chemotherapy, and assessed the effect of ATM loss on STING signaling and chemotherapy sensitivity in preclinical models.

Nonsynonymous mutations in ATM were observed in 11.2% of samples (2,980/26,587) and were significantly associated with mutations in KRAS, but mutually exclusive with EGFR (q < 0.1). KRAS mutational status constrained the ATM co-mutation landscape, with strong mutual exclusivity with TP53 and KEAP1 within KRAS-mutated samples. Those ATM mutations that co-occurred with TP53 were more likely to be missense mutations and associate with high mutational burden, suggestive of non-functional passenger mutations. In the CGDB cohort, dysfunctional ATM mutations associated with improved OS only in patients treated with ICI-chemotherapy, and not ICI alone. In vitro analyses demonstrated enhanced upregulation of STING signaling in ATM knockout cells with the addition of chemotherapy.

ATM mutations define a distinct subset of NSCLC associated with KRAS mutations, increased TMB, decreased TP53 and EGFR co-occurrence, and potential increased sensitivity to ICIs in the context of DNA-damaging chemotherapy.

Immunotherapy has vastly changed the treatment landscape for patients with advanced NSCLC. With high programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (tumor proportion score ≥50%), options include programmed cell death protein 1 or PD-L1 inhibitor with or without chemotherapy. A cut-point of greater than or equal to 50% defines PD-L1-high, but a more precise PD-L1 tumor proportion score may be an important predictor of outcomes.

We reviewed all patients with PD-L1-high NSCLC who received pembrolizumab from June 2019 to June 2021. Demographic, diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes data were collected retrospectively. The primary end point was a descriptive analysis of pembrolizumab prescribing patterns. Secondary end points included overall survival (OS) by treatment choice and absolute PD-L1 expression.

Overall, 132 patients received pembrolizumab; 124 (94%) as monotherapy, and 8 (6%) with chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics include the following: (1) median age 70 years (50-89); (2) 55% men; (3) 79% Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1; and (4) 96% current or former smokers. There were 39% who have PD-L1 greater than or equal to 90% versus 61% with PD-L1 of 50% to 89%. The median OS in the overall population was 14.4 months. The median OS in the pembrolizumab monotherapy cohort and combination cohort were 13.6 months and 16.6 months, respectively (p = 0.67). Within the monotherapy cohort, the median OS was longer for PD-L1 greater than or equal to 90% (19.8 mo) versus PD-L1 50% to 89% (11.9 mo, p = 0.039). The 24-month OS was 27.8% among patients with PD-L1 50% to 89% and 47.4% among patients with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 90%.

Most patients with advanced PD-L1-high NSCLC received pembrolizumab monotherapy, among whom OS was strongly correlated with PD-L1 expression, with PD-L1 greater than or equal to 90% of patients experiencing substantially longer survival. PD-L1 expression level could be an important determinant in immunotherapy prescribing patterns and a predictor of success in advanced NSCLC.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy are approved first-line treatments for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) expressing high levels of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1). However, appropriate treatment for patients showing high PD-L1 expression and poor performance status (PS) is not well defined.

The aim of this study was to identify a treatment option that is better for these patients in a real-world setting.

A total of 425 patients with NSCLC and high PD-L1 expression were included retrospectively. All patients received either pembrolizumab monotherapy or ICI plus chemotherapy as the first-line treatment. Patients were subdivided into good (PS score 0 or 1; n = 354) and poor PS groups (PS score 2 or 3; n = 71). Early progressive disease (PD) was defined as PD within 3 months of ICI-based therapy initiation.

The good PS group had significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than the poor PS group upon ICI-based therapy administration. In the poor PS group, no significant difference was observed in PFS and OS between pembrolizumab monotherapy and ICI plus chemotherapy. In the good PS group, pembrolizumab monotherapy, PD-L1 50-89%, and liver metastasis were associated with early PD, as determined using multivariate logistic regression analyses. However, in the poor PS group, the multivariate logistic regression analyses did not show an association between pembrolizumab monotherapy and early PD.

In patients with NSCLC exhibiting poor PS and high PD-L1 expression, ICI plus chemotherapy did not confer PFS or OS benefit compared with pembrolizumab monotherapy.