Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged as a transformative tool in the past decade. Initially employed in gout within the field of rheumatology to distinguish and quantify monosodium urate crystals through its dual-material discrimination capability, DECT has since broadened its clinical applications. It now encompasses various rheumatic diseases, employing advanced techniques such as bone marrow edema assessment, iodine mapping, and collagen-specific imaging. This review article aims to examine the unique characteristics of DECT, discuss its strengths and limitations, illustrate its applications for accurately evaluating various rheumatic diseases in clinical practice, and propose future directions for DECT in rheumatology.

To develop a machine learning (ML) model using clinical data and ultrasound features for gout prediction, and apply SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) for model interpretation.

This study analyzed 609 patients' first metatarsophalangeal (MTP1) joint ultrasound data from two institutions. Institution 1 data (n = 571) were split into training cohort (TC) and internal testing cohort (ITC) (8:2 ratio), while Institution 2 data (n = 92) served as external testing cohort (ETC). Key predictors were selected using Random Forest (RF), Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithms. Six ML models were evaluated using standard performance metrics, with SHAP analysis for model interpretation.

Five key predictors were identified: serum uric acid (SUA), deep learning (DL) model predictions, tophus, bone erosion, and double contour sign (DCs). The logistic regression (LR) model demonstrated optimal performance, achieving Area Under the Curve (AUC) values of 0.870 (95% CI: 0.820-0.920) in ITC and 0.854 (95% CI: 0.804-0.904) in ETC. The model showed good calibration with Brier scores of 0.138 and 0.159 in ITC and ETC, respectively.

This study developed an interpretable ML model for gout prediction and utilized SHAP to elucidate feature contributions, establishing a foundation for future applications in clinical decision support for gout diagnosis.

Wrist pain is common and can be attributed to tendon pathologies.This review aims to give a structured review of tendon anatomy, discuss anatomical pitfalls, and provide an overview of typical tendon pathologies of the wrist based on the current literature.Typical tendon pathologies of the wrist include de Quervain tenosynovitis, proximal and distal intersection syndrome, extensor and flexor pollicis longus tendon ruptures, and extensor carpi ulnaris subsheath injury. Typical pitfalls are multiple bundles of the abductor pollicis longus tendon or the centrally increased signal of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon.Both ultrasound and MRI are appropriate modalities for assessing the tendons of the wrist. Knowledge of normal anatomy, variants, pathologies, as well as appropriate imaging is crucial to determine the diagnosis. · Multiple tendon bundles of the abductor pollicis longus are a common anatomical feature and should not be mistaken for tendon splitting.. · An anatomical pitfall resembles the frequently found centrally increased signal of the extensor carpi ulnaris tendon caused by fibrovascular tissue.. · In order to visualize the diagnosis of a proximal intersection syndrome, the MR scan field needs to include the area approximately 4 to 8 cm proximal to Lister's tubercle.. · The tendons of the thumb, i.e., extensor and flexor pollicis longus, are most commonly torn after distal radial fracture (EPL) and osseous hardware fixation (FPL).. · Marth T, Grob NA, Jacobson JA et al. Tendon Anatomy and Tendon Disorders of the Wrist. Rofo 2025; DOI 10.1055/a-2499-5875.

Gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition (CPPD) disease are the most common causes of crystal arthritis. Identifying the pathogenic crystal deposition is the cornerstone of the diagnosis, but also prognosis and monitoring of the diseases. Conventional radiography has been for decades the only imaging technique used, with its very restricted sensitivity in both diseases. Advanced techniques, namely ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT), are being increasingly used in the diagnosis and management of gout and CPPD diseases, and their role is now well recognized in classification criteria and in recommendations for the diagnosis and management. In gout, ultrasound elementary lesions of monosodium urate deposition are well defined and have been shown to be sensitive to change and can be monitored, while direct quantification of these deposits can be performed with DECT. In CPPD disease, the definition of elementary lesions and their scoring has been well established for ultrasound, while the proof of concept that DECT can help discriminate calcium pyrophosphate crystal deposits among other calcium-containing structures has been shown. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the use of advanced imaging techniques in crystal-induced arthropathies.

To assess the consistency between ultrasound and dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) for the diagnosis of gout in the knee joint.

The ultrasound and DECT images of 176 knee joints from 167 patients diagnosed with gout at the Gout Specialty Clinic of Qingdao University Affiliated Hospital from February 2022 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. The knee joint was segmented into five anatomical regions: intra-articular, anterior, posterior, medial, and lateral. The location of monosodium urate (MSU) crystal deposition was recorded. Tophi were classified as hypoechogenic, isoechogenic, hyperechogenic, or strongly echogenic. The Kappa test was used to assess the consistency between the two examination methods in different regions of the knee joint. The McNemar chi-square test was utilized to conduct a differential analysis between the DECT and ultrasound results. The chi-square test was used to assess differences in the rate of tophi detection with different echogenicities by DECT. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to assess the correlation between MSU crystal deposition volume and clinically relevant indicators.

Double contour (61.4%) was the most common intra-articular ultrasound sign. In the extra-articular region, MSU crystals were commonly deposited in and around the popliteal groove region (ultrasound: 52.3%; DECT: 60.0%). Corresponding MSU deposits on DECT were found in 7 of 54 joints with aggregates detected on ultrasound, and in 15 of 108 joints with DC. Tophi with hyperechogenicity or strong echogenicity were more likely to be detected on DECT than those with hypoechoic or isoechoic features (84.3% and 90.9% vs. 55.1% and 27.8%, respectively). For the assessment of MSU deposits, ultrasound showed an overall higher positive rate than DECT (81.1% vs. 72.2%), with poor consistency between the two examinations (κ = 0.177). In distinct anatomical regions, ultrasound and DECT showed high consistency in the medial (κ = 0.651) and lateral (κ = 0.705) views, with no significant difference. The intra-articular (κ = 0.316) and anterior (κ = 0.346) regions exhibited only fair consistency, with statistically significant diagnostic differences. When exclusively assessing cases with tophi, ultrasound and DECT demonstrated similar consistency in the medial, lateral and anterior views (κ = 0.633, 0.712, and 0.400, respectively), with statistically significant differences. In the intra-articular region, the consistency was reduced (κ = 0.237), and the differences were statistically significant.

Ultrasound and DECT are effective methods to detect MSU deposition in gout of the knee. However, the consistency between the two techniques varies in different anatomical locations. Clinical assessment should be tailored based on the specific anatomical position. DECT is advantageous for the evaluation of intra-articular MSU deposits, while ultrasound is more sensitive for the early detection of scattered MSU deposits.

Gout is a common and growing health concern globally, marked by the deposition of monosodium urate (MSU) crystals in joints and soft tissues. While diagnosis relies on synovial fluid analysis, it is limited by technical difficulties and a notable rate of false negatives. Over the past decade, dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged as a highly sensitive and less-invasive modality for detecting MSU crystals. DECT offers several advantages, including the ability to visualize both intra- and extra-articular MSU deposits and to monitor crystal burden over time. It also aids in treatment planning by accurately assessing the therapeutic response. However, sensitivity of DECT can be lower in early-stage gout, and artifacts can occasionally result in false positives. Recent studies have highlighted new values of using DECT, such as predicting future flares in gout patients. In this review, we focus on the comprehensive clinical utility of DECT and its potential pitfalls in the diagnosis and management of gout.

Patellar pathologies are a common cause of knee dysfunction, with Patellofemoral Pain Syndrome (PFPS) alone responsible for 25% of knee-related visits to sports medicine clinics. Non-traumatic conditions, while often overlooked, can also lead to significant discomfort and functional limitations, highlighting the importance of accurate and timely diagnosis for effective management and prevention of complications. This pictorial review examines the radiologic characteristics of various non-traumatic patellar disorders, focusing on imaging modalities such as radiography, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Key diagnostic markers, including patellar tilt, tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), and congruence angle (CA), are discussed for their significance in non-traumatic pathology identification. Furthermore, this review highlights specific radiologic features for a range of non-traumatic patellar conditions, including patellar tendinopathy, chondromalacia patellae, and trochlear dysplasia, emphasizing how distinct radiologic findings facilitate precise diagnosis and clinical assessment. Ultimately, it provides a practical guide for clinicians in diagnosing non-traumatic patellar pathologies through a comprehensive review of key radiologic features while also discussing advancements in imaging technologies and management strategies to support accurate diagnosis and effective clinical decision-making.

Computed tomography (CT) is a common modality employed for musculoskeletal imaging. Conventional CT techniques are useful for the assessment of trauma in detection, characterization and surgical planning of complex fractures. CT arthrography can depict internal derangement lesions and impact medical decision making of orthopedic providers. In oncology, CT can have a role in the characterization of bone tumors and may elucidate soft tissue mineralization patterns. Several advances in CT technology have led to a variety of acquisition techniques with distinct clinical applications. These include four-dimensional CT, which allows examination of joints during motion; cone-beam CT, which allows examination during physiological weight-bearing conditions; dual-energy CT, which allows material decomposition useful in musculoskeletal deposition disorders (e.g., gout) and bone marrow edema detection; and photon-counting CT, which provides increased spatial resolution, decreased radiation, and material decomposition compared to standard multi-detector CT systems due to its ability to directly translate X-ray photon energies into electrical signals. Advanced acquisition techniques provide higher spatial resolution scans capable of enhanced bony microarchitecture and bone mineral density assessment. Together, these CT acquisition techniques will continue to play a substantial role in the practices of orthopedics, rheumatology, metabolic bone, oncology, and interventional radiology.

Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged as a transformative tool in the past decade. Initially employed in gout within the field of rheumatology to distinguish and quantify monosodium urate crystals through its dual-material discrimination capability, DECT has since broadened its clinical applications. It now encompasses various rheumatic diseases, employing advanced techniques such as bone marrow edema assessment, iodine mapping, and collagen-specific imaging. This review article aims to examine the unique characteristics of DECT, discuss its strengths and limitations, illustrate its applications for accurately evaluating various rheumatic diseases in clinical practice, and propose future directions for DECT in rheumatology.

To summarise current data regarding the use of imaging in crystal-induced arthropathies (CiAs) informing a European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology task force.

We performed four systematic searches in Embase, Medline and Central on imaging for diagnosis, monitoring, prediction of disease severity/treatment response, guiding procedures and patient education in gout, calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition (CPPD) and basic calcium phosphate deposition (BCPD). Records were screened, manuscripts reviewed and data of the included studies extracted. The risk of bias was assessed by validated instruments.

For gout, 88 studies were included. Diagnostic studies reported good to excellent sensitivity and specificity of dual-energy CT (DECT) and ultrasound (US), high specificity and lower sensitivity for conventional radiographs (CR) and CT. Longitudinal studies demonstrated sensitivity to change with regard to crystal deposition by US and DECT and inflammation by US and structural progression by CR and CT. For CPPD, 50 studies were included. Diagnostic studies on CR and US showed high specificity and variable sensitivity. There was a single study on monitoring, while nine assessed the prediction in CPPD. For BCPD, 56 studies were included. There were two diagnostic studies, while monitoring by CR and US was assessed in 43 studies, showing a reduction in crystal deposition. A total of 12 studies with inconsistent results assessed the prediction of treatment response. The search on patient education retrieved two studies, suggesting a potential role of DECT.

This SLR confirmed a relevant and increasing role of imaging in the field of CiAs.

The accurate diagnosis of gout frequently constitutes a challenge in clinical practice, as it bears a close resemblance to other rheumatologic conditions. An undelayed diagnosis and an early therapeutic intervention using uric acid lowering therapy (ULT) is of the utmost importance for preventing bone destruction, the main point of managing gout patients. Advanced and less invasive imaging techniques are employed to diagnose the pathology and ultrasonography (US) stands out as a non-invasive, widely accessible and easily reproducible method with high patient acceptability, enabling the evaluation of the full clinical spectrum in gout. The 2023 EULAR recommendations for imaging in diagnosis and management of crystal-induced arthropathies in clinical practice state that US is a fundamental imagistic modality. The guidelines underline its effectiveness in detecting crystal deposition, particularly for identifying tophi and the double contour sign (DCS). Its utility also arises in the early stages, consequent to synovitis detection. US measures of monosodium urate (MSU) deposits are valuable indicators, sensitive to change consequent to even short-term administration of ULT treatment, and can be feasibly used both in current daily practice and clinical trials. This paper aimed to provide an overview of the main US features observed in gout patients with reference to standardized imaging guidelines, as well as the clinical applicability both for diagnosis accuracy and treatment follow-up. Our research focused on summarizing the current knowledge on the topic, highlighting key data that emphasize gout as one of the few rheumatological conditions where US is recognized as a fundamental diagnostic and monitoring tool, as reflected in the most recent classification criteria.

The differential diagnosis of inflammatory arthritis as an immune-related adverse event can be challenging as patients with cancer can present with musculoskeletal symptoms that can mimic arthritis because of localized or generalized joint pain. In addition, immune checkpoint inhibitors can exacerbate joint conditions such as crystal-induced arthritis or osteoarthritis, or induce systemic disease that can affect the joints such as sarcoidosis. This distinction is important as the treatment of these conditions can be different from that of immune-related inflammatory arthritis.

Although musculoskeletal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a dominant role in characterizing abnormalities, novel computed tomography (CT) techniques have found an emerging niche in several scenarios such as trauma, gout, and the characterization of pathologic biomechanical states during motion and weight-bearing. Recent developments and advancements in the field of musculoskeletal CT include 4-dimensional, cone-beam (CB), and dual-energy (DE) CT. Four-dimensional CT has the potential to quantify biomechanical derangements of peripheral joints in different joint positions to diagnose and characterize patellofemoral instability, scapholunate ligamentous injuries, and syndesmotic injuries. Cone-beam CT provides an opportunity to image peripheral joints during weight-bearing, augmenting the diagnosis and characterization of disease processes. Emerging CBCT technologies improved spatial resolution for osseous microstructures in the quantitative analysis of osteoarthritis-related subchondral bone changes, trauma, and fracture healing. Dual-energy CT-based material decomposition visualizes and quantifies monosodium urate crystals in gout, bone marrow edema in traumatic and nontraumatic fractures, and neoplastic disease. Recently, DE techniques have been applied to CBCT, contributing to increased image quality in contrast-enhanced arthrography, bone densitometry, and bone marrow imaging. This review describes 4-dimensional CT, CBCT, and DECT advances, current logistical limitations, and prospects for each technique.

Ultrasonography continues to gain in importance in musculoskeletal diagnostics and has become the imaging modality of first choice in the search for active inflammation in patients with arthritis.

Value of ultrasonography, examination techniques, explanation of findings and differential diagnoses in arthrosonography of the hand.

Review of the literature, description of the examination procedure, discussion of recent publications, guidelines and recommendations.

Ultrasonography is a sensitive and specific method that is easy to learn. Ultrasonography and radiography are complementary and should be interpreted together. A good ultrasound generally makes the more expensive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) unnecessary. Findings in rheumatoid arthritis and its differential diagnoses should be interpreted in a clinical context taking into consideration the number and quantity and lack of other findings.

According to recent developments, athrosonography will gain more importance for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis in arthritis patients. An interdisciplinary approach helps in understanding the disease and imaging findings.