|
1
|
Perry WRG, Christensen P, Collinson RJ, Cornish JA, D’Hoore A, Gurland BH, Mellgren A, Ratto C, Ris F, Stevenson ARL, Bordeianou L. Ventral Rectopexy: An International Expert Panel Consensus and Review of Contemporary Literature. Dis Colon Rectum 2025; 68:593-607. [PMID: 39882786 PMCID: PMC11999100 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000003656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventral rectopexy has become increasingly used in the surgical management of rectal prolapse. There is a need for a contemporary evaluation of the role of the procedure and a description of its use in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To create an international consensus on ventral rectopexy. DESIGN An expert panel undertook a scoping review of the literature to identify subject domains of interest. Literature reviews were completed for each domain with subsequent development of evidence-based and practice-based statements. These statements were compiled and reviewed by the group over a total of 9 meetings. Once statements were confirmed, supportive text was finalized, and an anonymous vote was completed using Research Electronic Data Capture to record consensus. SETTING An international expert panel comprising colorectal surgeons who perform ventral rectopexy in a high-volume center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Statements and associated expert consensus. RESULTS Eleven experts identified 10 domains for review: indications, contraindications, assessment and planning, consent, operative details, prostheses, complications, follow-up, recurrence and reoperative surgery, and specific considerations. After round table review, there were 17 resultant statements for consideration. Experts agreed unanimously with 13 of the statements and their accompanying text, with different experts disagreeing regarding the remaining 4 statements (91% consensus each). LIMITATIONS Paucity of high-quality data. CONCLUSIONS This international group developed 17 statements with high consensus. These statements provide an up-to-date summary of the literature, identify key areas for research development, and provide a reference point for colon and rectal surgeons who undertake ventral rectopexy as part of their practice. See Video Abstract . RECTOPEXIA VENTRAL CONSENSO DE UN PANEL INTERNACIONAL DE EXPERTOS Y REVISIN DE LA LITERATURA CONTEMPORNEA ANTECEDENTES:La rectopexia ventral se ha utilizado cada vez más en el tratamiento quirúrgico del prolapso rectal. Es necesario realizar una evaluación contemporánea del rol del procedimiento y una descripción de su uso en la práctica clínica.OBJETIVO:Crear un consenso internacional sobre la rectopexia ventral.DISEÑO:Un panel de expertos realizó una revisión exhaustiva de la literatura para identificar los dominios temáticos de interés. Se completaron revisiones de la literatura para cada dominio con el desarrollo de declaraciones basadas en la evidencia y la práctica. Estas fueron compiladas y revisadas por el grupo a lo largo de un total de nueve reuniones. Una vez que se confirmaron las declaraciones, se finalizó el texto de apoyo y se completó una votación anónima utilizando REDCap para registrar el consenso.ESCENARIO:Un panel internacional de expertos compuesto por cirujanos colorrectales que realizan rectopexia ventral en un centro de alto volumen.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOS:Declaraciones y consenso de expertos asociado.RESULTADOS:Once expertos identificaron diez dominios a revisar: indicaciones, contraindicaciones, evaluación y planificación, consentimiento, detalles operatorios, prótesis, complicaciones, seguimiento, recurrencia y cirugía reoperatoria y consideraciones específicas. Después de la revisión en mesa redonda, hubo 17 declaraciones resultantes para su consideración. Los expertos estuvieron de acuerdo unánimemente con trece de las declaraciones y su texto acompañante, y diferentes expertos estuvieron en desacuerdo con cuatro declaraciones (91% de consenso cada una).LIMITACIONES:Escasez de datos de alta calidad.CONCLUSIÓN:Este grupo internacional desarrolló 17 declaraciones con alto consenso. Estas declaraciones proporcionan un resumen actualizado de la literatura, identifican áreas claves para el desarrollo de la investigación y un punto de referencia para los cirujanos de colon y recto que realizan rectopexia ventral como parte de su práctica. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez ).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Peter Christensen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Rowan J. Collinson
- Colorectal Unit, Department of General Surgery, Te Toka Tumei Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Julie A. Cornish
- Cardiff and Vale University Health Board, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - André D’Hoore
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, UZ Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Brooke H. Gurland
- Division of General Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Anders Mellgren
- Department of Surgical Oncology, King Faisal Specialist Hospital, Research Center, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Carlo Ratto
- Proctology and Pelvic Floor Surgery Unit, Catholic University, Ospedale Isola Tiberina-Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy
| | - Frederic Ris
- Division of Digestive Surgery, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Liliana Bordeianou
- Colorectal Surgery Section, Department of Surgery, Center for Pelvic Floor Disorders, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Driouch J, Sajid S, Bausch D, Thaher O. Robot-assisted mesh rectosacropexy and sigmoid colon resection for obstructive defecation syndrome: a two-stage surgical approach. J Robot Surg 2025; 19:123. [PMID: 40119229 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02283-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2025] [Accepted: 03/10/2025] [Indexed: 03/24/2025]
Abstract
Obstructive Defecation Syndrome (ODS) significantly affects the quality of life and is often associated with rectocele, rectoanal intussusception, and dolichosigma. Robot-assisted rectosacropexy followed by sigmoid resection may offer an effective therapeutic approach. This study included 7 female patients (mean age 61.14 years, BMI 27.17) with confirmed ODS and no prior treatment for rectal prolapse or dolichosigma. Using standardized scores (Wexner, Altomare ODS), outcomes were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. Robot-assisted rectosacropexy with mesh placement and subsequent sigmoid resection were performed in two surgical stages. Significant improvements in constipation (Wexner score reduced from 14.1 to 8.7, p < 0.01) and ODS symptoms (Altomare ODS score from 19.1 to 5.6, p < 0.01) were noted at 6 months. Continence (Wexner Incontinence Score) improved from 13.4 to 7.1. No conversions or major complications occurred, and all patients reported satisfaction with the treatment. Robot-assisted rectosacropexy followed by sigmoid resection is a safe and effective two-step approach for ODS. Further studies are needed to explore its long-term efficacy and functional outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamal Driouch
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth Hospital, Lehrkrankenhaus of Ruhr University of Bochum, Hochstraße 63, 58638, Iserlohn, Germany.
| | - Shazadi Sajid
- Department of Surgery, Elisabeth Hospital, Lehrkrankenhaus of Ruhr University of Bochum, Hochstraße 63, 58638, Iserlohn, Germany
| | - Dirk Bausch
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany
| | - Omar Thaher
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Usman M, Khan IU, Hadi A. Outcomes of Laparoscopic Suture vs Mesh Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse. Cureus 2023; 15:e50758. [PMID: 38239515 PMCID: PMC10794792 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.50758] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare outcomes of laparoscopic suture and laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for the treatment of complete rectal prolapse in adults. Materials and methods This study was conducted between December 2020 to December 2022, involving 75 patients (Group A: 34; Group B: 41). Inclusion criteria encompassed confirmed complete rectal prolapse. Preoperative measures included comprehensive assessments, mechanical bowel cleansing, prophylactic antibiotics, and rectal irrigation. Surgical techniques involved laparoscopic suture rectopexy for Group A and laparoscopic mesh rectopexy for Group B. Postoperative care and follow-up evaluations were conducted. Results Group A demonstrated advantages in terms of shorter operative times, quicker bowel activity resumption, and reduced hospital stays. Intraoperative bleeding was absent in Group A, while wound-related complications were higher in Group B. Recurrence rates were lower in Group A (2.9%) compared to Group B (9.8%). Both groups exhibited improvements in incontinence grades postoperatively. Constipation increased in both groups. Conclusion Both techniques are effective in treating complete rectal prolapse, each with its advantages and considerations. Group A showed potential benefits in terms of operative efficiency and fewer complications, albeit with a potential for increased recurrence. The study emphasizes the need for individualized patient care, considering factors such as operative characteristics, postoperative outcomes, and patient preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Usman
- Department of General Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Imran Uddin Khan
- Department of General Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Ainul Hadi
- Department of General Surgery, Hayatabad Medical Complex Peshawar, Peshawar, PAK
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Rogier-Mouzelas F, Drissi F, Podevin J, Duchalais E, Meurette G. Anatomic and functional results of ventral biological mesh rectopexy for posterior pelvic floor disorders. J Visc Surg 2023; 160:188-195. [PMID: 36344359 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2022.09.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is the gold standard for rectal prolapse surgery, but the type of mesh reinforcement is still a matter of debate. The aim of this study was to assess the anatomic and functional results of a single center cohort of patients receiving ventral rectopexy with biological mesh compared to a reference group who had implantation of synthetic mesh. We also assessed the predictive factors for recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS Seventy patients (2015-2021) were included in the biological mesh group and were compared to a reference group of 345 patients operated on with a synthetic mesh (2004-2017). RESULTS In the biological mesh group, the mean age of patients was 65 years (53-72). The main disorders of the posterior pelvic floor were rectal prolapse (30 cases) or rectocele (37 cases). Two patients had solitary rectal ulcer syndrome and one had internal prolapse. VMR was performed by a laparoscopic approach with robotic assistance in 93%. After a median follow-up of 12 (4.5-23) months, the anatomic recurrence rate was 10%. The median satisfaction score assessed in a telephone interview by a semi-quantitative scale from 0 to 10 was 7. Compared to the synthetic group, neither the morbidity rate (Dindo>2) (0.6% synthetic versus 1.4% biological mesh), nor the recurrence rate (12% synthetic versus 10% biological (ns) with an average interval of 13.5 versus 14 months, respectively) were statistically significantly different. CONCLUSION VMR with biological mesh represents an alternative to synthetic mesh. Despite its resorbable nature, biological mesh does not seem to increase the risk of recurrence and offers satisfying functional results after a medium term follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Rogier-Mouzelas
- Cancer, digestive and endocrine surgery clinic, University Hospital Center of Nantes, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France
| | - F Drissi
- Cancer, digestive and endocrine surgery clinic, University Hospital Center of Nantes, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France
| | - J Podevin
- Cancer, digestive and endocrine surgery clinic, University Hospital Center of Nantes, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France
| | - E Duchalais
- Cancer, digestive and endocrine surgery clinic, University Hospital Center of Nantes, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France
| | - G Meurette
- Cancer, digestive and endocrine surgery clinic, University Hospital Center of Nantes, 44093 Nantes cedex 1, France.
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Driouch J, Thaher O, Brinkmann S, Bausch D, Glatz T. Robotic-assisted rectosigmoid resection rectopexy with natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE): technical notes, short-term results, and functional outcome. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:177. [PMID: 37140719 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02918-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Rectosigmoid resection rectopexy has been established as an effective therapy for obstructive defecation syndrome. The addition of the NOSE-technique provides an even less invasive approach avoiding minilaparotomy, but can be technically challenging. Application of a robotic platform has been proposed to facilitate the specimen extraction and fashioning of the intracorporeal anastomosis and has been proven to be effective in left-sided colectomies. METHODS After establishing laparoscopic rectosigmoid-resection-rectopexy with NOSE, we modified our technique by addition of the robotic platform. Whenever robotic capacity was available, elective patients scheduled for rectosigmoid resection rectopexy for obstructive defecation syndrome were operated robotically assisted. Demographic and intraoperative data were prospectively collected. Follow up was assessed using the Wexner constipation score, Wexner incontinence score, and Altomare ODS score. RESULTS The NOSE-RRR technique was completed in all 31 patients. The mean operative time was 166 min (range 67-230). No conversion was required. The median hospital stay was 5 days (range 3-28). Four patients had minor complications (Clavien I). Two patients were reoperated (Clavien IIIb). Functional scores improved significantly postoperatively. Mean Wexner incontinence score was 7.1 preoperatively, 6.9 after 1 month, and decreased significantly to 3.93 after 3 months (p < 0.001). Mean Altomare ODS score was 17.47 preoperatively and 6.93/5.03 after 1/3 months (p < 0.001). Wexner constipation score (12.83) also showed a significant improvement after 1/3 months (6.97/6.67; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION NOSE-RRR can be performed safely with a low rate of manageable complications. The technique provides a significant improvement for ODS-Symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jamal Driouch
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany
- Department of Surgery, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Iserlohn, Germany
| | - Omar Thaher
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany
| | - Sebastian Brinkmann
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany
| | - Dirk Bausch
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany
| | - Torben Glatz
- Department of Surgery, Marien Hospital Herne, Ruhr University of Bochum, Hölkeskampring 40, 44625, Herne, Germany.
- Department of Surgery, Südharzklinikum Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Zammit AP, Srinath H, Warner R, Mor I, Clark DA. Recurrent pouch volvulus treated with robotic ventral graft pouch‐pexy. ANZ J Surg 2022; 93:1386-1387. [DOI: 10.1111/ans.18197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P. Zammit
- Faculty of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Havish Srinath
- Department of Surgery John Flynn Private Hospital Queensland Gold Coast Australia
- Department of Surgery The Tweed Hospital New South Wales Tweed Heads Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
- School of Medicine Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Ross Warner
- Department of Surgery John Flynn Private Hospital Queensland Gold Coast Australia
- Department of Surgery The Tweed Hospital New South Wales Tweed Heads Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
- School of Medicine Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - Isabella Mor
- Department of Surgery John Flynn Private Hospital Queensland Gold Coast Australia
- Department of Surgery The Tweed Hospital New South Wales Tweed Heads Australia
- Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine Bond University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
- School of Medicine Griffith University Gold Coast Queensland Australia
| | - David A. Clark
- Faculty of Medicine University of Queensland Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Services Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital Queensland Brisbane Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health University of Sydney and Surgical Outcomes Research Centre (SOuRCe) Sydney New South Wales Australia
- Department of Surgery St Vincent's Private Hospital Northside Queensland Brisbane Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Grossi U, Lacy-Colson J, Brown SR, Cross S, Eldridge S, Jordan M, Mason J, Norton C, Scott SM, Stevens N, Taheri S, Knowles CH. Stepped-wedge randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in adults with chronic constipation. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:941-952. [PMID: 35588336 PMCID: PMC9117980 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02633-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background The effectiveness of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) in patients with defecatory disorders secondary to internal rectal prolapse is poorly evidenced. A UK-based multicenter randomized controlled trial was designed to determine the clinical efficacy of LVMR compared to controls at medium-term follow-up. Methods The randomized controlled trial was conducted from March 1, 2015 TO January 31, 2019. A stepped-wedge RCT design permitted observer-masked data comparisons between patients awaiting LVMR (controls) with those who had undergone surgery. Adult participants with radiologically confirmed IRP refractory to conservative treatment were randomized to three arms with different delays before surgery. Efficacy outcome data were collected at equally stepped time points (12, 24, 36, 48, 60, and 72 weeks). Clinical efficacy of LVMR compared to controls was defined as ≥ 1.0-point reduction in Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life and/or Symptoms (PAC-QOL and/or PAC-SYM) scores at 24 weeks. Secondary outcome measures included 14-day diary data, the Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), St Marks incontinence score, the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Urinary Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire (PISQ-12), the chronic constipation Behavioral Response to Illness Questionnaire (CC-BRQ), and the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIPQ). Results Of a calculated sample size of 114, only 28 patients (100% female) were randomized from 6 institutions (due mainly to national pause on mesh-related surgery). Nine were assigned to the T0 arm, 10 to T12, and 9 to T24. There were no substantial differences in baseline characteristics between the three arms. Compared to baseline, significant reduction (improvement) in PAC-QOL and PAC-SYM scores were observed at 24 weeks post-surgery (– 1.09 [95% CI – 1.76, – 0.41], p = 0.0019, and – 0.92 [– 1.52, – 0.32], p = 0.0029, respectively) in the 19 patients available for analysis (9 were excluded for dropout [n = 2] or missing primary outcome [n = 7]). There was a clinically significant long-term reduction in PAC-QOL scores (− 1.38 [− 2.94, 0.19], p = 0.0840 at 72 weeks). Statistically significant improvements in PAC-SYM scores persisted to 72 weeks (− 1.51 [− 2.87, − 0.16], p = 0.0289). Compared to baseline, no differences were found in secondary outcomes, except for significant improvements at 24 and 48 weeks on CC-BRQ avoidance behavior (− 14.3 [95% CI − 23.3, − 5.4], and − 0.92 [− 1.52, − 0.32], respectively), CC-BRQ safety behavior (− 13.7 [95% CI − 20.5, − 7.0], and − 13.0 [− 19.8, − 6.1], respectively), and BIPQ negative perceptions (− 16.3 [95% CI − 23.5, − 9.0], and − 10.5 [− 17.9, − 3.2], respectively). Conclusions With the caveat of under-powering due to poor recruitment, the study presents the first randomized trial evidence of short-term benefit of LVMR for internal rectal prolapse. Trial registration ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN11747152). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10151-022-02633-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Grossi
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, DISCOG, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
| | - J Lacy-Colson
- Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury and Telford Hospital NHS Trust, Shrewsbury, UK
| | - S R Brown
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Sheffield, UK
- School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - S Cross
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S Eldridge
- Pragmatic Clinical Trials Unit, Institute of Population Health Sciences, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - M Jordan
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - J Mason
- Warwick Clinical Trials Unit, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - C Norton
- Faculty of Nursing, Midwifery and Palliative Care, King's College London, London, UK
| | - S M Scott
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - N Stevens
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - S Taheri
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - C H Knowles
- Centre for Neuroscience, Surgery and Trauma, Blizard Institute, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
van der Schans EM, Boom MA, El Moumni M, Verheijen PM, Broeders IAMJ, Consten ECJ. Mesh-related complications and recurrence after ventral mesh rectopexy with synthetic versus biologic mesh: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol 2022; 26:85-98. [PMID: 34812970 PMCID: PMC8763765 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-021-02534-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a widely accepted surgical treatment for rectal prolapse. Both synthetic and biologic mesh are used. No consensus exists on the preferred type of mesh material. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to establish an overview of the current literature on mesh-related complications and recurrence after VMR with synthetic or biologic mesh to aid evidence-based decision making in preferred mesh material. METHODS A systematic search of the electronic databases of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane was performed (from inception until September 2020). Studies evaluating patients who underwent VMR with synthetic or biologic mesh were eligible. The MINORS score was used for quality assessment. RESULTS Thirty-two studies were eligible after qualitative assessment. Eleven studies reported on mesh-related complications including 4001 patients treated with synthetic mesh and 762 treated with biologic mesh. The incidence of mesh-related complications ranged between 0 and 2.4% after synthetic versus 0-0.7% after biologic VMR. Synthetic mesh studies showed a pooled incidence of mesh-related complications of 1.0% (95% CI 0.5-1.7). Data of biologic mesh studies could not be pooled. Twenty-nine studies reported on the risk of recurrence in 2371 synthetic mesh patients and 602 biologic mesh patients. The risk of recurrence varied between 1.1 and 18.8% for synthetic VMR versus 0-15.4% for biologic VMR. Cumulative incidence of recurrence was found to be 6.1% (95% CI 4.3-8.1) and 5.8% (95% CI 2.9-9.6), respectively. The clinical and statistical heterogeneity was high. CONCLUSIONS No definitive conclusions on preferred mesh type can be made due to the quality of the included studies with high heterogeneity amongst them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E M van der Schans
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute of Technical Medicine, Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - M A Boom
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - M El Moumni
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - P M Verheijen
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - I A M J Broeders
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Institute of Technical Medicine, Twente University, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - E C J Consten
- Department of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Maatweg 3, 3813 TZ, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Tsiaousidou A, MacDonald L, Shalli K. Mesh safety in pelvic surgery: Our experience and outcome of biological mesh used in laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10:891-898. [PMID: 35127904 PMCID: PMC8790465 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i3.891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/23/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) continues to be a popular treatment option for rectal prolapse, obstructive defecation/faecal incontinence and rectoceles. In recent years there have been concerns regarding the safety of mesh placements in the pelvis.
AIM To assess the safety of the mesh and the outcome of the procedure.
METHODS Eighty-six patients underwent LVMR with Permacol (Biological) mesh from 2012 to 2018 at University Hospital Wishaw. Forty were treated for obstructive defecation secondary to prolapse, rectocele or internal rectal intussusception, 38 for mixed symptoms obstructive defecation and incontinence, 5 for pain and bleeding secondary to full thickness prolapse and 3 with symptoms of incontinence. Questionnaires for the calculation of Wexner scores for constipation and incontinence were completed by the patients who were followed up in the clinic 12 wk after surgery and again in 6-12 mo. The average review of their notes was 18.3 ± 4.2 mo.
RESULTS The median Wexner scores for constipation pre-operatively and post-operatively were 14.5 [Interquartile range (IQR): 10.5-18.5] and 3 (IQR: 1-6), respectively, while the median Wexner score for faecal incontinence was 11 (IQR: 7-15) and 2 (IQR: 0-5), respectively (P < 0.01). There were 4 (4.6%) recurrences, 2 cases that presented with erosion of a suture through the rectum and one with diskitis. No mesh complications or mortalities were recorded.
CONCLUSION LVMR using a Permacol mesh is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of obstructive defecation/faecal incontinence, rectal prolapse, rectoceles and internal rectal prolapse/intussusception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anastasia Tsiaousidou
- Department of Surgery, Wishaw University Hospital, Wishaw ML2 0DP, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
| | - Linda MacDonald
- Department of Surgery, Wishaw University Hospital, Wishaw ML2 0DP, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
| | - Kawan Shalli
- Department of Surgery, Wishaw University Hospital, Wishaw ML2 0DP, Lanarkshire, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy for obstructed defaecation syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Updates Surg 2021; 74:11-21. [PMID: 34665411 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01177-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Accepted: 09/19/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Obstructed Defecation Syndrome (ODS) is a rather complex entity concerning mainly females and causing primarily constipation. Surgical treatment in the form of Ventral Prosthesis Rectopexy (VPR) has been proposed and seems to have the best outcomes. However, the selection criteria of patients to undergo this kind of operation are not clear and the reported outcomes are mainly short-term and data on long-term outcomes is scarce. This study assesses new evidence on the efficacy of VPR for the treatment of ODS, specifically focusing on inclusion criteria for surgery and the long-term outcomes. A search was performed of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Ovid and Cochrane databases on all studies reporting on VPR for ODS from 2000 to March 2020. No language restrictions were made. All studies on VPR were reviewed systematically. The main outcomes were intra-operative complications, conversion, procedure duration, short-term mortality and morbidity, length of stay, faecal incontinence and constipation, quality of life (QoL) score and patient satisfaction. Quality assessment and data extraction were performed independently by three observers. Fourteen studies including 963 patients were eligible for analysis. The immediate postoperative morbidity rate was 8.9%. A significant improvement in constipation symptoms was observed in the 12-month postoperative period for ODS (p < 0.0001). Current evidence shows that VPR offers symptomatic relief to the majority of patients with ODS, improving both constipation-like symptoms and faecal incontinence for at least 1-2 years postoperatively. Some studies report on functional results after longer follow-up, showing sustainable improvement, although in a lesser extent.
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Xu PP, Su YH, Zhang Y, Lu T. Modified Gant procedure for treatment of internal rectal prolapse in elderly women. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:8702-8709. [PMID: 34734048 PMCID: PMC8546830 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i29.8702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although rectal prolapse is not a life-threatening condition, it can cause defecation disorders, anal incontinence, sensory abnormalities, and other problems that can seriously affect quality of life.
AIM To study the efficacy of the modified Gant procedure for elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.
METHODS Sixty-three elderly female patients with internal rectal prolapse underwent the modified Gant procedure. The preoperative and postoperative anal symptoms, Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QOL), Wexner incontinence score, incontinence quality of life score, and complications (massive hemorrhage, infection, anorectal stenosis, and anorectal fistula) were compared.
RESULTS The improvement rates of postoperative symptoms were defecation disorders (84.5%), anal distention (69.6%), defecation sensation (81.4%), frequent defecation (88.7%), and anal incontinence (42.9%) (P < 0.05). All dimensions and total scores of the PAC-QOL after the procedure were lower than those before the operation (P < 0.05). The postoperative anal incontinence score and Wexner score were significantly lower than those before the procedure (P < 0.05). The quality of life and total scores of postoperative anal incontinence were significantly higher than those before the procedure (P < 0.05). There were no serious complications and no deaths.
CONCLUSION The modified Gant procedure has significant advantages in the treatment of elderly women with internal rectal prolapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peng-Peng Xu
- Department of Anorectal, Shandong Provincial Hospital (Group) Huaiyin People’s Hospital, Jinan 250021, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yong-Hong Su
- Department of Anorectal, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250013, Shandong Province, China
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Anorectal, Shanghe People’ Hospital, Shanghe 251600, Shandong Province, China
| | - Tong Lu
- Department of Anorectal, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan 250013, Shandong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Gallo G, Trompetto M, Realis Luc A, Novelli E, De Paola G, Clerico G, Sammarco G. Anatomo-functional outcomes of the laparoscopic Frykman-Goldberg procedure for rectal prolapse in a tertiary referral centre. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1819-1828. [PMID: 34138448 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-021-01114-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Rectal prolapse is a common disorder that represents a burden for patients due to the associated symptoms that may include both incontinence and constipation. Currently, a huge variation in techniques exist. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomo-functional results of the laparoscopic Frykman-Goldberg procedure (LFGP) for the treatment of both internal (IRP) and complete rectal prolapse (CRP). Between July 2004 and October 2019, 45 patients with IRP and CRP underwent a LFGP. The Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS), Obstructed Defecation Syndrome Score (ODSS) and Vaizey Score (VS) were assessed preoperatively, 3 months before the procedure, 12 months after the procedures and at the final follow-up visit. The patients' mean age was 51.4 ± 17.9 (15-93) years, and the mean follow-up was 9.24 ± 4.57 (1.6-16.3) years. The VS, CCCS and ODSS significantly improved (p = 0.008; p < 0.001; p < 0.001) from median preoperative values of 3, 20 and 18 to 2, 6 and 5, respectively. Furthermore, the improvements in scores during follow-up remained constant and significant over time when considering the two groups separately (time effect for ODSS p < 0.001, for VS p = 0.026, for CCCS p < 0.001) and when the patients were divided by age (< 40, 41-60 and > 60; p < 0.001). The overall complication rate was 8.9% (4/45), and no intraoperative complications or anastomotic leakage occurred. Conversion to the open approach was not necessary in any case. The overall success rate was 97.7%, and only one recurrence in the IRP group occurred after 14 months. LRGP can be considered a safe, effective and long-lasting procedure in young patients with IRP or CRP, a history of ODS and a redundant sigmoid colon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Gallo
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy.
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, S. Rita Clinic, 13100, Vercelli, Italy.
| | - Mario Trompetto
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, S. Rita Clinic, 13100, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Alberto Realis Luc
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, S. Rita Clinic, 13100, Vercelli, Italy
| | | | - Gilda De Paola
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Clerico
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, S. Rita Clinic, 13100, Vercelli, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Sammarco
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Catanzaro, 88100, Catanzaro, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
van Gruting IM, Stankiewicz A, Thakar R, Santoro GA, IntHout J, Sultan AH. Imaging modalities for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with obstructed defaecation syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2021; 9:CD011482. [PMID: 34553773 PMCID: PMC8459393 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011482.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstructed defaecation syndrome (ODS) is difficulty in evacuating stools, requiring straining efforts at defaecation, having the sensation of incomplete evacuation, or the need to manually assist defaecation. This is due to a physical blockage of the faecal stream during defaecation attempts, caused by rectocele, enterocele, intussusception, anismus or pelvic floor descent. Evacuation proctography (EP) is the most common imaging technique for diagnosis of posterior pelvic floor disorders. It has been regarded as the reference standard because of extensive experience, although it has been proven not to have perfect accuracy. Moreover, EP is invasive, embarrassing and uses ionising radiation. Alternative imaging techniques addressing these issues have been developed and assessed for their accuracy. Because of varying results, leading to a lack of consensus, a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature are required. OBJECTIVES To determine the diagnostic test accuracy of EP, dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pelvic floor ultrasound for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with ODS, using latent class analysis in the absence of a reference standard, and to assess whether MRI or ultrasound could replace EP. The secondary objective was to investigate differences in diagnostic test accuracy in relation to the use of rectal contrast, evacuation phase, patient position and cut-off values, which could influence test outcome. SEARCH METHODS We ran an electronic search on 18 December 2019 in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, SCI, CINAHL and CPCI. Reference list, Google scholar. We also searched WHO ICTRP and clinicaltrials.gov for eligible articles. Two review authors conducted title and abstract screening and full-text assessment, resolving disagreements with a third review author. SELECTION CRITERIA Diagnostic test accuracy and cohort studies were eligible for inclusion if they evaluated the test accuracy of EP, and MRI or pelvic floor ultrasound, or both, for the detection of posterior pelvic floor disorders in women with ODS. We excluded case-control studies. If studies partially met the inclusion criteria, we contacted the authors for additional information. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors performed data extraction, including study characteristics, 'Risk-of-bias' assessment, sources of heterogeneity and test accuracy results. We excluded studies if test accuracy data could not be retrieved despite all efforts. We performed meta-analysis using Bayesian hierarchical latent class analysis. For the index test to qualify as a replacement test for EP, both sensitivity and specificity should be similar or higher than the historic reference standard (EP), and for a triage test either specificity or sensitivity should be similar or higher. We conducted heterogeneity analysis assessing the effect of different test conditions on test accuracy. We ran sensitivity analyses by excluding studies with high risk of bias, with concerns about applicability, or those published before 2010. We assessed the overall quality of evidence (QoE) according to GRADE. MAIN RESULTS Thirty-nine studies covering 2483 participants were included into the meta-analyses. We produced pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity for all index tests for each target condition. Findings of the sensitivity analyses were consistent with the main analysis. Sensitivity of EP for diagnosis of rectocele was 98% (credible interval (CrI)94%-99%), enterocele 91%(CrI 83%-97%), intussusception 89%(CrI 79%-96%) and pelvic floor descent 98%(CrI 93%-100%); specificity for enterocele was 96%(CrI 93%-99%), intussusception 92%(CrI 86%-97%) and anismus 97%(CrI 94%-99%), all with high QoE. Moderate to low QoE showed a sensitivity for anismus of 80%(CrI 63%-94%), and specificity for rectocele of 78%(CrI 63%-90%) and pelvic floor descent 83%(CrI 59%-96%). Specificity of MRI for diagnosis of rectocele was 90% (CrI 79%-97%), enterocele 99% (CrI 96%-100%) and intussusception 97% (CrI 88%-100%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with high QoE. MRI did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Heterogeneity analysis showed that sensitivity of MRI performed with evacuation phase was higher than without for rectocele (94%, CrI 87%-98%) versus 65%, CrI 52% to 89%, and enterocele (87%, CrI 74%-95% versus 62%, CrI 51%-88%), and sensitivity of MRI without evacuation phase was significantly lower than EP. Specificity of transperineal ultrasound (TPUS) for diagnosis of rectocele was 89% (CrI 81%-96%), enterocele 98% (CrI 95%-100%) and intussusception 96% (CrI 91%-99%); sensitivity for anismus was 92% (CrI 72%-98%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with high QoE. TPUS did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Heterogeneity analysis showed that sensitivity of TPUS performed with rectal contrast was not significantly higher than without for rectocele(92%, CrI 69%-99% versus 81%, CrI 58%-95%), enterocele (90%, CrI 71%-99% versus 67%, CrI 51%-90%) and intussusception (90%, CrI 69%-98% versus 61%, CrI 51%-86%), and was lower than EP. Specificity of endovaginal ultrasound (EVUS) for diagnosis of rectocele was 76% (CrI 54%-93%), enterocele 97% (CrI 80%-99%) and intussusception 93% (CrI 72%-99%); sensitivity for anismus was 84% (CrI 59%-96%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with very low to moderate QoE. EVUS did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Specificity of dynamic anal endosonography (DAE) for diagnosis of rectocele was 88% (CrI 62%-99%), enterocele 97% (CrI 75%-100%) and intussusception 93% (CrI 65%-99%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with very low to moderate QoE. DAE did not meet the criteria to replace EP. Echodefaecography (EDF) had a sensitivity of 89% (CrI 65%-98%) and specificity of 92% (CrI 72%-99%) for intussusception, meeting the criteria to replace EP but with very low QoE. Specificity of EDF for diagnosis of rectocele was 89% (CrI 60%-99%) and for enterocele 97% (CrI 87%-100%); sensitivity for anismus was 87% (CrI 72%-96%), meeting the criteria for a triage test with low to very low QoE. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In a population of women with symptoms of ODS, none of the imaging techniques met the criteria to replace EP. MRI and TPUS met the criteria of a triage test, as a positive test confirms diagnosis of rectocele, enterocele and intussusception, and a negative test rules out diagnosis of anismus. An evacuation phase increased sensitivity of MRI. Rectal contrast did not increase sensitivity of TPUS. QoE of EVUS, DAE and EDF was too low to draw conclusions. More well-designed studies are required to define their role in the diagnostic pathway of ODS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabelle Ma van Gruting
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital NHS Trust, Croydon, Netherlands
| | | | - Ranee Thakar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital NHS Trust, Croydon, UK
| | - Giulio A Santoro
- Section of Anal Physiology and Ultrasound, Department of Surgery, Regional Hospital, Treviso, Italy
| | - Joanna IntHout
- Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, Netherlands
| | - Abdul H Sultan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Croydon University Hospital NHS Trust, Croydon, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Maeda Y, Espin-Basany E, Gorissen K, Kim M, Lehur PA, Lundby L, Negoi I, Norcic G, O'Connell PR, Rautio T, van Geluwe B, van Ramshorst GH, Warwick A, Vaizey CJ. European Society of Coloproctology guidance on the use of mesh in the pelvis in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 2021; 23:2228-2285. [PMID: 34060715 DOI: 10.1111/codi.15718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2020] [Revised: 03/14/2021] [Accepted: 03/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
This is a comprehensive and rigorous review of currently available data on the use of mesh in the pelvis in colorectal surgery. This guideline outlines the limitations of available data and the challenges of interpretation, followed by best possible recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasuko Maeda
- Cumberland Infirmary and University of Edinburgh, Carlisle, UK
| | | | | | - Mia Kim
- Department of General, Gastrointestinal, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Wuerzburg, Germany
| | | | - Lilli Lundby
- Department of Surgery Pelvic Floor Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ionut Negoi
- Faculty of General Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Gregor Norcic
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - P Ronan O'Connell
- Department of Surgery, St Vincent's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tero Rautio
- Medical Research Center, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland
| | | | | | - Andrea Warwick
- QEII Jubilee Hospital, Acacia Ridge, Queensland, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Grinstein E, Abdelkhalek Y, Veit-Rubin N, Gluck O, Deval B. Long term outcomes of laparoscopic sacro/colpo-hysteropexy with and without rectopexy for the treatment of prolapse. Int Urogynecol J 2021; 33:343-350. [PMID: 34125240 DOI: 10.1007/s00192-021-04868-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS Laparoscopic sacrohysteropexy (LSH), sacrocolpopexy (LSC) and ventral rectopexy (LVR) with mesh are advocated for surgical treatment of pelvic and rectal prolapse. Our study aims at showing the feasibility of concomitant laparoscopic prolapse repair by comparing perioperative and long-term outcomes of LSH or LSC with and without LVR. METHODS This is a retrospective study carried out on 348 women operated on between July 2009 and July 2019. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) LSH only, (2) LSC only, (3) LSH + LVR and (4) LSC + LVR. POP-Q scores and satisfaction questionnaires were recorded at baseline and then annually. Outcomes were defined as subjective failure (vaginal/rectal prolapse symptoms), objective failure (prolapse to/beyond the hymen, full thickness rectal prolapse) or retreatment for prolapse. Complications were collected and graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS Three hundred forty-eight women underwent laparoscopic repair for pelvic and rectal prolapse (219, 44, 66 and 19 in group 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Median follow-up was 24 (4-174) months. Success rate for both rectal and pelvic prolapse was 90.2%. Recurrence rates were not significantly different between the groups (12.3%, 6.8%, 9.1% and 10.5% for groups 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively). Significant improvement was noticed in satisfaction questionnaires in all groups. There was no difference in perioperative and late complications. CONCLUSION The combined laparoscopic procedure appears to be safe and efficient in treating pelvic and rectal prolapse. Appropriate patient selection and available surgical expertise should determine whether to perform these procedures combined or separately.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ehud Grinstein
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yara Abdelkhalek
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. Hôtel-Dieu de France University Hospital, St Joseph University, Beirut, Lebanon. .,, Paris, France.
| | - Nikolaus Veit-Rubin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Ohad Gluck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Edith Wolfson Medical Center, Holon, Israel.,affiliated with Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Bruno Deval
- Department of Functional Pelvic Surgery & Oncology, Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire, Ramsay Santé, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Functional and sexual outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy vs transperineal mesh repair in the treatment of rectocele: a retrospective analysis. Eur Surg 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s10353-021-00695-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
|
17
|
Lobb HS, Kearsey CC, Ahmed S, Rajaganeshan R. Suture rectopexy versus ventral mesh rectopexy for complete full-thickness rectal prolapse and intussusception: systematic review and meta-analysis. BJS Open 2021; 5:6073393. [PMID: 33609376 PMCID: PMC7893464 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zraa037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare recurrence rates of rectal prolapse following ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) and suture rectopexy (SR). Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies reporting on the recurrence rates of complete rectal prolapse (CRP) or intussusception (IS) after SR and VMR. Results were pooled and procedures compared; a subgroup analysis was performed comparing patients with CRP and IS who underwent VMR using biological versus synthetic meshes. A meta-analysis of studies comparing SR and VMR was undertaken. The Methodological Items for Non-Randomized Studies score, the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale, and the Cochrane Collaboration tool were used to assess the quality of studies. Results Twenty-two studies with 976 patients were included in the SR group and 31 studies with 1605 patients in the VMR group; among these studies, five were eligible for meta-analysis. Overall, in patients with CRP, the recurrence rate was 8.6 per cent after SR and 3.7 per cent after VMR (P < 0.001). However, in patients with IS treated using VMR, the recurrence rate was 9.7 per cent. Recurrence rates after VMR did not differ with use of biological or synthetic mesh in patients treated for CRP (4.1 versus 3.6 per cent; P = 0.789) and or IS (11.4 versus 11.0 per cent; P = 0.902). Results from the meta-analysis showed high heterogeneity, and the difference in recurrence rates between SR and VMR groups was not statistically significant (P = 0.76). Conclusion Although the systematic review showed a higher recurrence rate after SR than VMR for treatment of CRP, this result was not confirmed by meta-analysis. Therefore, robust RCTs comparing SR and biological VMR are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H S Lobb
- University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - C C Kearsey
- St Helen's and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
| | - S Ahmed
- Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Naldini G, Fabiani B, Sturiale A, Russo E, Simoncini T. Advantages of robotic surgery in the treatment of complex pelvic organs prolapse. Updates Surg 2021; 73:1115-1124. [PMID: 33387168 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-020-00913-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery is safe and effective to treat the complex pelvic organs prolapse (C-POP). The present study analyzes all the robotic procedures and their advantages in the treatment of C-POP performed in a Proctologic and Pelvic Floor Clinical Centre. All the patients affected by C-POP who had robot-assisted surgery were retrospective analyzed. The anatomical and functional outcomes were respectively evaluated through POP-Q grading system and Wexner score about constipation and incontinence. The satisfaction rate was investigated using a five-point scale. From September 2014 to December 2018, 229 women underwent robotic surgery. The follow-up was 12 months. There were no robot-related complications. One hematoma (4.5%) of the recto-vaginal space occurred after Robotic Ventral Rectopexy with Folded Mesh (R-VRP-FM). In the robotic assisted lateral suspension (R-ALS) group there was one case of anterior vaginal wall mesh exposure (0.9%). After the robotic ventral rectopexy (R-VRP) the recurrence rate of external rectal prolapse, internal rectal prolapse, rectocele and enterocele was respectively 6.6, 9.5, 7.4 and 9.5%. After R-VRP-FM only one cystocele (14%) and one partial rectal prolapse (25%) recurred. Vaginal bulge symptoms resolution rate was 95.4%. The mean Wexner constipation score significantly decreased after R-VRP and R-VRP-FM. Vaginal bulge symptoms improved in 98.3% of cases with any apical prolapse recurrence after robotic abdominal colposacropexy. Success rate after R-ALS was 99.1% and 96.4% for apical and anterior prolapse respectively. Robotic assistance makes some surgical steps easier and more precise and this may result in less morbidity and better results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriele Naldini
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Cisanello University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Bernardina Fabiani
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Cisanello University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sturiale
- Proctological and Perineal Surgical Unit, Cisanello University Hospital, Via Paradisa 2, Pisa, Italy.
| | - Eleonora Russo
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Santa Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Tommaso Simoncini
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Santa Chiara University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Wang L, Li CX, Tian Y, Ye JW, Li F, Tong WD. Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:5976-5987. [PMID: 33344596 PMCID: PMC7723726 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5976] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2020] [Revised: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Abdominal ventral rectopexy (AVR) with colectomy is controversial in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS). Literature data on this technique for ODS are very limited. AIM To evaluate the safety and efficacy of AVR with colectomy for selected patients with ODS. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent AVR with colectomy for ODS were identified prospectively from 2016 to 2017 in our department. Patient demographics, perioperative surgical results, and postoperative follow-up outcomes were collected and analyzed. Long-term follow-up was evaluated with standardized questionnaires. The severity of symptoms was assessed by the objective Wexner Constipation Score (WCS) and ODS Score. The quality of life was assessed by the Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life score. Functional outcome was compared pre- and post-operatively for each patient. The primary outcomes were determined by the improvement in symptoms and quality of life. Secondary outcome measures were operating time, postoperative length of stay, morbidity and mortality, improvement of pelvic floor structure, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS Four patients underwent robotic-assisted surgery, and two patients underwent a laparoscopic-assisted procedure. The mean operating time for the robotic approach was 243 min (range 160-300 min), and the mean operating time for the laparoscopic approach was 230 min (range 220-240 min). The mean postoperative length of stay was 8.2 d (range 6-12 d). There was no conversion to open procedure and no postoperative mortality. No urinary retention, wound infection, prolonged ileus, pelvic infection and anastomosis leakage occurred. Six patients were followed up for 36 mo. The WCS, ODS, and Patients Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life score improved significantly postoperatively (P < 0.05). The WCS and ODS scores showed the best remission and stabilization at 6 to 12 mo after surgery. There was no recurrence or novel constipation after surgery. None of the patients used laxative medication. CONCLUSION Robotic and laparoscopic-assisted ventral rectopexy with colectomy is a safe and effective procedure for selected patients with ODS. However, comprehensive preoperative evaluation and careful patient selection are essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
| | - Chun-Xue Li
- Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
| | - Yue Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
| | - Jing-Wang Ye
- Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
| | - Fan Li
- Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
| | - Wei-Dong Tong
- Department of General Surgery, Daping Hospital, Army Medical University, Chongqing 400042, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Wang L, Li CX, Tian Y, Ye JW, Li F, Tong WD. Abdominal ventral rectopexy with colectomy for obstructed defecation syndrome: An alternative option for selected patients. World J Clin Cases 2020. [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
|
|
21
|
Yang Y, Cao YL, Zhang YY, Shi SS, Yang WW, Zhao N, Lyu BB, Zhang WL, Wei D. Clinical efficacy of integral theory–guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females. World J Clin Cases 2020. [DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5873] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
|
|
22
|
Yang Y, Cao YL, Zhang YY, Shi SS, Yang WW, Zhao N, Lyu BB, Zhang WL, Wei D. Clinical efficacy of integral theory–guided laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair in the treatment of internal rectal prolapse in females. World J Clin Cases 2020; 8:5876-5886. [PMID: 33344586 PMCID: PMC7723707 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i23.5876] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2020] [Revised: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 10/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Internal rectal prolapse (IRP) is one of the most common causes of obstructive constipation. The incidence of IRP in women is approximately three times that in men. IRP is mainly treated by surgery, which can be divided into two categories: Abdominal procedures and perineal procedures. This study offers a better procedure for the treatment of IRP.
AIM To compare the clinical efficacy of laparoscopic integral pelvic floor/ligament repair (IPFLR) combined with a procedure for prolapse and hemorrhoids (PPH) and the laparoscopic IPFLR alone in the treatment of IRP in women.
METHODS This study collected the clinical data of 130 female patients with IRP who underwent surgery from January 2012 to October 2014. The patients were divided into groups A and B. Group A had 63 patients who underwent laparoscopic IPFLR alone, and group B had 67 patients who underwent the laparoscopic IPFLR combined with PPH. The degree of internal rectal prolapse (DIRP), Wexner constipation scale (WCS) score, Wexner incontinence scale (WIS) score, and Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) score were compared between groups and within groups before surgery and 6 mo and 2 years after surgery.
RESULTS All laparoscopic surgeries were successful. The general information, number of bowel movements before surgery, DIRP, GIQLI score, WIS score, and WCS score before surgery were not significantly different between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The WCS score, WIS score, GIQLI score, and DIRP in each group 6 mo, and 2 years after surgery were significantly better than before surgery (P < 0.001). In group A, the DIRP and WCS score gradually improved from 6 mo to 2 years after surgery (P < 0.001), and the GIQLI score progressively improved from 6 mo to 2 years after surgery (P < 0.05). In group B, the DIRP, WCS score and WIS score significantly improved from 6 mo to 2 years after surgery (P < 0.05), and the GIQLI score 2 years after surgery was significantly higher than that 6 mo after surgery (P < 0.05). The WCS score, WIS score, GIQLI score, and DIRP of group B were significantly better than those of group A 6 mo and 2 years after surgery (all P < 0.001, Bonferroni) except DIRP at 2 years after surgery. There was a significant difference in the recurrence rate of IRP between the two groups 6 mo after surgery (P = 0.011). There was no significant difference in postoperative grade I-III complications between the two groups (P = 0.822).
CONCLUSION Integral theory–guided laparoscopic IPFLR combined with PPH has a higher cure rate and a better clinical efficacy than laparoscopic IPFLR alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Yang
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Yong-Li Cao
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Yuan-Yao Zhang
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Shou-Sen Shi
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Wei-Wei Yang
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Nan Zhao
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Bing-Bing Lyu
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Wen-Li Zhang
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| | - Dong Wei
- Institute of Anal-Colorectal Surgery, the 989 Hospital of The Joint Logistics Support Force of PLA, Luoyang 471031, Henan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Campagna G, Panico G, Caramazza D, Anchora LP, Parello A, Gallucci V, Vacca L, Scambia G, Ercoli A, Ratto C. Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy plus ventral rectopexy as combined treatment for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 2020; 24:573-584. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-020-02199-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2019] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
|
24
|
Current treatment of pelvic organ prolapse correlated with chronic pelvic pain, bladder and bowel dysfunction. Curr Opin Urol 2018; 27:274-281. [PMID: 28306603 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The purpose of this review is to critically analyze the relationship between symptoms of abnormal emptying of the bladder, urgency, pelvic pain, anorectal dysfunction and pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and to present evidence in order to show how many of the above mentioned symptoms can be cured or substantially improved by repair of specific pelvic ligaments. RECENT FINDINGS In this review, we provide evidence to show how often these dysfunctions occur and how they can be cured in 42-94% by appropriate pelvic floor surgery in the longer term, up to 2 years. Laxity in ligaments and/or vaginal membrane due to damaged connective tissue may prevent the normal opening and closure mechanism of urethra and anus, because muscles need finite lengths to contract properly. Hypermobility of the apex can irritate the pelvic plexus causing chronic pelvic pain. In consequence, dysfunctions as abnormal emptying of the bladder, urgency, pelvic pain, fecal incontinence and obstructed defecation can occur in women with different degrees of POP. SUMMARY In conclusion, it has to be recognized that women bothered by these symptoms should be examined for POP and appropriately advised for possibility of cure by pelvic floor surgery after careful selection. VIDEO ABSTRACT.
Collapse
|
|
25
|
McLean R, Kipling M, Musgrave E, Mercer-Jones M. Short- and long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy using biological mesh for pelvic organ prolapse: a prospective cohort study of 224 consecutive patients. Colorectal Dis 2018; 20:424-436. [PMID: 29265594 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2017] [Accepted: 10/26/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) is potentially a safe and effective operation to correct pelvic organ prolapse and to treat obstructive defaecation and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome. This study aimed to evaluate, in a prospective, consecutive cohort of patients, the long-term clinical outcomes following LVMR, patient-reported functional and quality of life outcomes, and urinary and sexual dysfunction. METHOD Data on 224 patients who underwent LVMR with Permacol™ biological mesh were collected prospectively from May 2008 to October 2016. Outcome measures were complications, recurrence, mortality, patient satisfaction, patient-reported functional and quality of life outcomes, and urinary and sexual dysfunction. Scores were compared using the two-tailed Wilcoxon signed rank test. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS There was no mortalities associated with LVMR in this series; complications occurred in 10.7% of patients (4.9% early, 5.8% late). Mesh-related morbidity was 0.45% and vaginal suture-related morbidity was 1.33%. Recurrence occurred in 25 patients (11.4%), 5% at 12 months, 10.7% at 5 years. Significant improvement in patient-reported functional outcomes were seen (P < 0.001) for both constipation and faecal incontinence symptoms. Furthermore, significant improvement in quality of life outcomes for patients with constipation, faecal incontinence and prolapse persisted through follow-up (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction was positive for > 90% of patients during follow-up. Symptoms of stress urinary incontinence, urge incontinence and dyspareunia improved significantly postoperatively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION LVMR using Permacol is associated with low morbidity and mortality, recurrence and, additionally, significantly improved constipation, faecal incontinence and prolapse functional and quality of life outcomes, with associated improvement in urogynaecological symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R McLean
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead, UK
| | - M Kipling
- Sunderland Royal Hospital, Sunderland, UK
| | - E Musgrave
- Department of Radiology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead, UK
| | - M Mercer-Jones
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Sheriff Hill, Gateshead, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Pelvic floor function following ventral rectopexy versus STARR in the treatment of obstructed defecation. Tech Coloproctol 2018; 22:289-294. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-018-1776-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
|
|
27
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Information is needed on long-term functional results, sequelas, and outcome predictors for laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to evaluate long-term function postventral rectopexy in patients with external rectal prolapse or internal rectal prolapse in a large cohort and to identify the possible effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details on patient-reported outcomes. DESIGN This was a retrospective review with a cross-sectional questionnaire study. SETTINGS Data were collated from prospectively collected registries in 2 university and 2 central hospitals in Finland. PATIENTS All 508 consecutive patients treated with ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse or symptomatic internal rectal prolapse in 2005 to 2013 were included. INTERVENTIONS A questionnaire concerning disease-related symptoms and effect on quality of life was used. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Defecatory function measured by the Wexner score, the obstructive defecation score, and subjective symptom and quality-of-life evaluation using the visual analog scale were included. The effects of patient-related factors and operative technical details were assessed using multivariate analysis. RESULTS The questionnaire response rate was 70.7% (330/467 living patients) with a median follow-up time of 44 months. The mean Wexner scores were 7.0 (SD = 6.1) and 6.9 (SD = 5.6), and the mean obstructive defecation scores were 9.7 (SD = 7.6) and 12.3 (SD = 8.0) for patients presenting with external rectal prolapse and internal rectal prolapse. Subjective symptom relief was experienced by 76% and reported more often by patients with external rectal prolapse than with internal rectal prolapse (86% vs 68%; p < 0.001). Complications occurred in 11.4% of patients, and the recurrence rate for rectal prolapse was 7.1%. LIMITATIONS This study was limited by its lack of preoperative functional data and suboptimal questionnaire response rate. CONCLUSIONS Ventral mesh rectopexy effectively treats posterior pelvic floor dysfunction with a low complication rate and an acceptable recurrence rate. Patients with external rectal prolapse benefit more from the operation than those with symptomatic internal rectal prolapse. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A479.
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Grossi U, Knowles CH, Mason J, Lacy-Colson J, Brown SR. Surgery for constipation: systematic review and practice recommendations: Results II: Hitching procedures for the rectum (rectal suspension). Colorectal Dis 2017; 19 Suppl 3:37-48. [PMID: 28960927 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM To assess the outcomes of rectal suspension procedures (forms of rectopexy) in adults with chronic constipation. METHOD Standardised methods and reporting of benefits and harms were used for all CapaCiTY reviews that closely adhered to PRISMA 2016 guidance. Main conclusions were presented as summary evidence statements with a summative Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (2009) level. RESULTS Eighteen articles were identified, providing data on outcomes in 1238 patients. All studies reported only on laparoscopic approaches. Length of procedures ranged between 1.5 to 3.5 h, and length of stay between 4 to 5 days. Data on harms were inconsistently reported and heterogeneous, making estimates of harm tentative and imprecise. Morbidity rates ranged between 5-15%, with mesh complications accounting for 0.5% of patients overall. No mortality was reported after any procedures in a total of 1044 patients. Although inconsistently reported, good or satisfactory outcome occurred in 83% (74-91%) of patients; 86% (20-97%) of patients reported improvements in constipation after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR). About 2-7% of patients developed anatomical recurrence. Patient selection was inconsistently documented. As most common indication, high grade rectal intussusception was corrected in 80-100% of cases after robotic or LVMR. Healing of prolapse-associated solitary rectal ulcer syndrome occurred in around 80% of patients after LVMR. CONCLUSION Evidence supporting rectal suspension procedures is currently derived from poor quality studies. Methodologically robust trials are needed to inform future clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- U Grossi
- National Bowel Research Centre, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - C H Knowles
- National Bowel Research Centre, Blizard Institute, Queen Mary University London, London, UK
| | - J Mason
- University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | | | - S R Brown
- Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| | -
- National Institute for Health Research: Chronic Constipation Treatment Pathway, London, UK
| | -
- Affiliate section of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
Albayati S, Morgan MJ, Turner CE. Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception using a biological mesh. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:857-862. [PMID: 28371010 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2016] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) is a nerve-sparing technique for the treatment of rectal prolapse. Concerns about the use of synthetic meshes in the pelvis and the associated risk of erosion have led to the recent use of biological meshes in some colorectal units. This retrospective study aims to assess the outcomes of patients undergoing LVR using a noncross-linked nondermal biological mesh. METHOD The medical notes of all patients who underwent LVR between 1 December 2011 and 31 May 2014 were reviewed. The rate of obstructed defaecation before surgery was retrospectively determined from medical records using the Rome III criteria. The rates of obstructed defaecation and faecal incontinence following surgery were determined using a self-reported questionnaire. RESULTS A total of 51 patients had LVR between 1 December 2011 and 31 May 2014. Their mean age was 57.3 ± 2.5 years and the mean follow-up was 23 ± 1 months. There were seven (13.7%) postoperative complications. In total, 45 (88%) patients completed the functional outcome questionnaires. Before surgery, 33 (73.3%) patients complained of symptoms of obstructed defaecation. At the end of follow-up, 22 (48.8%, P = 0.001) patients continued to have some symptoms of obstructed defaecation. Before surgery, 12 (26.7%) patients complained of faecal incontinence. At the end of follow-up, only three (6.7%, P = 0.004) patients reported faecal incontinence. At the end of follow-up, recurrence of symptoms had occurred in six (13.3%) patients. CONCLUSION LVR using a biological mesh is safe and results in significant reduction in symptoms associated with external rectal prolapse and rectal intussusception.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Albayati
- Department of Surgery, Bankstown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - M J Morgan
- Department of Surgery, Bankstown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - C E Turner
- Department of Surgery, Bankstown Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Hogan AM, Tejedor P, Lindsey I, Jones O, Hompes R, Gorissen KJ, Cunningham C. Pregnancy after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: implications and outcomes. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:O345-O349. [PMID: 28710784 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AIM Surgical management of rectal prolapse varies considerably. Most surgeons are reluctant to use ventral mesh rectopexy in young women until they have completed their family. The aim of the present study was to review outcomes of pregnancy following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy from a tertiary referral centre over a 10-year period (2006-2016) and to review the impact on pelvic floor symptoms. METHOD We undertook a retrospective review of a prospectively compiled database of patients who had undergone laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in a single centre over a 10-year period. Pelvic floor symptom scores (Vaizey for incontinence and Longo for obstructive defaecation) were collected at initial presentation (pre-intervention), post-intervention and after child birth. RESULTS In all, 954 rectopexies were performed over this 10-year period. 225 (24%) patients were women and under 45 years of age (taken as an arbitrary cut-off for decreased likelihood of pregnancy). Eight (4%) of these patients became pregnant following rectopexy. The interval between rectopexy and delivery was 42 months (21-50). Six patients delivered live babies by elective lower segment caesarean section and two by spontaneous vaginal delivery. Six were first babies and two were second. No mesh related adverse outcome was reported. No difference in pelvic floor symptoms was demonstrated on comparison of post-rectopexy and post-delivery scores. CONCLUSION This study provides the first description in the English language literature of safe delivery by elective lower segment caesarean section or spontaneous vaginal delivery following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy. No adverse impact on pelvic floor related quality of life was detected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A M Hogan
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - P Tejedor
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - I Lindsey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - O Jones
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - K J Gorissen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - C Cunningham
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Oxford University Hospital, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Ris F, Gorissen KJ, Ragg J, Gosselink MP, Buchs NC, Hompes R, Cunningham C, Jones O, Slater A, Lindsey I. Rectal axis and enterocele on proctogram may predict laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy outcomes for rectal intussusception. Tech Coloproctol 2017; 21:627-632. [PMID: 28674947 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-017-1643-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2016] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy (LVMR) has become a well-established treatment for symptomatic high-grade internal rectal prolapse. The aim of this study was to identify proctographic criteria predictive of a successful outcome. METHODS One hundred and twenty consecutive patients were evaluated from a prospectively maintained pelvic floor database. Pre- and post-operative functional results were assessed with the Wexner constipation score (WCS) and Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI). Proctogram criteria were analyzed against functional results. These included grade of intussusception, presence of enterocele, rectocele, excessive perineal descent and the orientation of the rectal axis at rest (vertical vs. horizontal). RESULTS Ninety-one patients completed both pre- and post-operative follow-up questionnaires. Median pre-operative WCS was 14 (range 10-17), and median FISI was 20 (range 0-61), with 28 patients (31%) having a FISI above 30. The presence of an enterocele was associated with more frequent complete resolution of obstructed defecation (70 vs. 52%, p = 0.02) and fecal incontinence symptoms (71 vs. 38%, p = 0.01) after LVMR. Patients with a more horizontal rectum at rest pre-operatively had significantly less resolution of symptoms post-operatively (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS These data show that proctographic findings can help predict functional outcomes after LVMR. Presence of an enterocele and a vertical axis of the rectum at rest may be associated with a better resolution of symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ris
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. .,Department of Visceral Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland.
| | - K J Gorissen
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - J Ragg
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - M P Gosselink
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - N C Buchs
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - R Hompes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - C Cunningham
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - O Jones
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - A Slater
- Department of Radiology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - I Lindsey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, John Radcliffe and Churchill Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
Alloplastisches Material in der Prolapschirurgie. COLOPROCTOLOGY 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00053-017-0174-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
|
33
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy effectively treats posterior compartment prolapse. However, recurrence after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is poorly understood. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate factors contributing to recurrence after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. DESIGN A retrospective cohort analysis was performed of patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy between June 2008 and June 2014. Patients presenting with full-thickness rectal prolapse were compared against the rest. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine predictors for recurrence. Operative findings of redo cases were evaluated. SETTINGS This study was conducted under the supervision of a single pelvic floor surgeon. PATIENTS A total of 231 patients with a median follow-up of 47 months were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Clinicopathological risk factors and technical failures contributing to recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS The overall recurrence rate was 11.7% (n = 27). Twenty-five recurrences occurred in patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse, of which 16 were full-thickness recurrences (14.2% (16/113)). Multivariate analyses showed predictors for recurrence to be prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency (HR = 5.57 (95% CI, 1.13 - 27.42); p = 0.04) and the use of synthetic mesh as compared with biologic grafts (HR = 4.24 (95% CI, 1.27-14.20); p = 0.02). Age >70 years and poorer preoperative continence were also associated with recurrence on univariate analysis. Technical failures contributing to recurrence included mesh detachment from the sacral promontory and inadequate midrectal mesh fixation. LIMITATIONS Modifications to the operative technique were made throughout the study period. A postoperative defecating proctogram was not routinely performed. CONCLUSIONS Recurrence after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is multifactorial, and risk factors are both clinical and technical. The use of biologic grafts was associated with lower recurrence as compared with synthetic mesh. Patients with full-thickness rectal prolapse who are elderly, have poorer baseline continence, and have prolonged pudendal nerve terminal motor latency are at increased risk of recurrence.
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Emile SH, Elfeki HA, Youssef M, Farid M, Wexner SD. Abdominal rectopexy for the treatment of internal rectal prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 2017; 19:O13-O24. [PMID: 27943547 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2016] [Accepted: 10/09/2016] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
AIM Internal rectal prolapse (IRP) is a unique functional disorder that presents with a wide spectrum of clinical symptoms, including constipation and/or faecal incontinence (FI). The present review aims to analyse the results of trials evaluating the role of abdominal rectopexy in the treatment of IRP with regard to regarding functional and technical outcomes. METHOD A systematic review of the literature for the role of abdominal rectopexy in patients with IRP was conducted. PubMed/Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for published and unpublished studies from January 2000 to December 2015. RESULTS We reviewed 14 studies including 1301 patients (1180 women) of a median age of 59 years. The weighted mean rates of improvement of obstructed defaecation (OD) and FI across the studies were 73.9% and 60.2%, respectively. Twelve studies reported clinical recurrence in 84 (6.9%) patients. The weighted mean recurrence rate of IRP among the studies was 5.8% (95% CI: 4.2-7.5). Two hundred and thirty complications were reported with a weighted mean complication rate of 15%. Resection rectopexy had lower recurrence rates than did ventral rectopexy, whereas ventral rectopexy achieved better symptomatic improvement, a shorter operative time and a lower complication rate. CONCLUSION Abdominal rectopexy for IRP attained satisfactory results with improvement of OD and, to a lesser extent, FI, a low incidence of recurrence and an acceptable morbidity rate. Although ventral rectopexy was associated with higher recurrence rates, lower complication rates and better improvement of bowel symptoms than resection rectopexy, these findings cannot be confirmed owing to the limitations of this review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S H Emile
- General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt
| | - H A Elfeki
- General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt
| | - M Youssef
- General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt
| | - M Farid
- General Surgery Department, Colorectal Surgery Unit, Mansoura Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura City, Egypt
| | - S D Wexner
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Payne I, Grimm LM. Functional Disorders of Constipation: Paradoxical Puborectalis Contraction and Increased Perineal Descent. Clin Colon Rectal Surg 2016; 30:22-29. [PMID: 28144209 DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1593430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Paradoxical puborectalis contraction (PPC) and increased perineal descent (IPD) are subclasses of obstructive defecation. Often these conditions coexist, which can make the evaluation, workup, and treatment difficult. After a thorough history and examination, workup begins with utilization of proven diagnostic modalities such as cinedefecography and anal manometry. Advancements in technology have increased the surgeon's diagnostic armamentarium. Biofeedback and pelvic floor therapy have proven efficacy for both conditions as first-line treatment. In circumstances where PPC is refractory to biofeedback therapy, botulinum toxin injection is recommended. Historically, pelvic floor repair has been met with suboptimal results. In IPD, surgical therapy now is directed toward the potentially attendant abnormalities such as rectoanal intussusception and rectal prolapse. When these associated abnormalities are not present, an ostomy should be considered in patients with IPD as well as medically refractory PPC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isaac Payne
- Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama
| | - Leander M Grimm
- Division of Colon & Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama, Mobile, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Biological mesh extrusion months after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Tech Coloproctol 2016; 21:91-92. [PMID: 27885515 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-016-1561-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/07/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
|
37
|
Cariou de Vergie L, Venara A, Duchalais E, Frampas E, Lehur PA. Internal rectal prolapse: Definition, assessment and management in 2016. J Visc Surg 2016; 154:21-28. [PMID: 27865742 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Internal rectal prolapse (IRP) is a well-recognized pelvic floor disorder mainly seen during defecatory straining. The symptomatic expression of IRP is complex, encompassing fecal continence (56%) and/or evacuation disorders (85%). IRP cannot be characterized easily by clinical examination alone and the emergence of dynamic defecography (especially MRI) has allowed a better comprehension of its pathophysiology and led to the proposition of a severity score (Oxford score) that can guide management. Decision for surgical management should be multidisciplinary, discussed after a complete work-up, and only after medical treatment has failed. Information should be provided to the patient, outlining the goals of treatment, the potential complications and results. Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) has been considered as the gold standard for IRP treatment. However, inconsistent results (failure observed in up to 20% of cases, and fecal incontinence occurring in up to 25% of patients at one year) have led to a decrease in its indications. Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy has substantial advantages in solving the functional problems due to IRP (efficacy on evacuation and resolution of continence symptoms in 65-92%, and 73-97% of patients, respectively) and is currently considered as the gold standard therapy for IRP once the decision to operate has been made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Cariou de Vergie
- Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44000 Nantes, France; Maternité, hôpital Mère-Enfant, CHU de Nantes, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - A Venara
- Clinique de chirurgie générale et digestive, 49000 Angers, France
| | - E Duchalais
- Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - E Frampas
- Radiologie centrale, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44000 Nantes, France
| | - P A Lehur
- Clinique de chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne, Hôtel-Dieu, CHU de Nantes, 1, place Alexis-Ricordeau, 44000 Nantes, France.
| |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
[Alloplastic material in prolapse surgery : Indications and postoperative outcome of ventral rectopexy]. Chirurg 2016; 88:141-146. [PMID: 27515904 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-016-0264-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In rectopexy the use of meshes provides stability by mechanical support as well as by the induction of scar formation; however, one of the problems of conventional methods of mesh rectopexy is that many patients postoperatively suffer from functional disorders, such as fecal incontinence and stool evacuation disorders. One reason is the damage of vegetative nerves following dorsal and lateral mobilization of the rectum, which is required for positioning of the mesh. In 2004 D'Hoore and Penninckx first described the method of ventral rectopexy, a new technique of mesh rectopexy which allows preservation of the autonomic nerves. OBJECTIVE Does ventral rectopexy provide advantages regarding functional outcome, complications and recurrence rates? MATERIAL AND METHODS A search was carried out in the databases PubMed and Medline for studies on ventral rectoplexy. Presentation and analysis of the current state of relevant studies relating to ventral rectopexy. RESULTS Ventral rectopexy is characterized by a low complication rate and good functional results in terms of improvement of incontinence, constipation and stool evacuation disorders. The indications for ventral rectopexy are considered in patients with external prolapse of the rectum. Also in a well-selected patient population internal prolapse, rectocele as well as enterocele accompanied by obstructive defecation syndrome represent relative indications for ventral rectopexy. CONCLUSION In order to obtain a valid assessment of the value of this procedure it is crucial to improve the current lack of evidence (level 3) by prospective randomized studies that compare ventral rectopexy with other surgical techniques and nonsurgical treatment options.
Collapse
|
|
39
|
Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Ohta T, Kusanagi H. Quality of life after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy. Colorectal Dis 2016; 18:O301-10. [PMID: 26709009 DOI: 10.1111/codi.13247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2015] [Accepted: 11/10/2015] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
AIM This study evaluated continence, constipation and quality of life (QOL) before and after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) METHOD: Between February 2012 and July 2014, patients who underwent LVR for external rectal prolapse (ERP) and/or rectoanal intussusception (RAI) were prospectively included. A standard questionnaire including the Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (FISI), the Constipation Scoring System (CSS) and QOL instruments (Short-Form 36 Health Survey, Fecal Incontinence QOL scale, Patient Assessment of Constipation-QOL) were administered before and after operation. Psychiatric patients and those with dementia were excluded from the study. Defaecography was performed 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS Fifty-nine patients were included in the study period and 44 (19 with ERP, 25 with RAI) completed the follow-up questionnaire and were reviewed after a median of 26 (range 12-42) months. There was no recurrent ERP. Postoperative defaecography showed new-onset RAI in 6 and persistent RAI in 1. One year after surgery, incontinence was improved in 30/39 patients (77%) and constipation in 19/32 (59%). The FISI scores reduced between preoperative status and 1 year after surgery [32 (13-61) vs 11 (0-33), P < 0.0001]. The CSS scores also reduced [preoperative 12 (5-18) vs 1 year 5 (1-12), P < 0.0001]. Compared with the preoperative scores, almost all of the scale scores on the three kinds of QOL instruments significantly improved over time. The presence of new-onset or persistent RAI did not have an adverse effect on the improvement of QOL. CONCLUSION LVR improves both generic and symptom-specific QOL with good functional results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tsunoda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa City, Chiba, Japan
| | - T Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa City, Chiba, Japan
| | - T Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa City, Chiba, Japan
| | - H Kusanagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa City, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
van Iersel JJ, Paulides TJC, Verheijen PM, Lumley JW, Broeders IAMJ, Consten ECJ. Current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for external and internal rectal prolapse. World J Gastroenterol 2016; 22:4977-4987. [PMID: 27275090 PMCID: PMC4886373 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i21.4977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2016] [Revised: 04/15/2016] [Accepted: 05/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
External and internal rectal prolapse with their affiliated rectocele and enterocele, are associated with debilitating symptoms such as obstructed defecation, pelvic pain and faecal incontinence. Since perineal procedures are associated with a higher recurrence rate, an abdominal approach is commonly preferred. Despite the description of greater than three hundred different procedures, thus far no clear superiority of one surgical technique has been demonstrated. Ventral mesh rectopexy (VMR) is a relatively new and promising technique to correct rectal prolapse. In contrast to the abdominal procedures of past decades, VMR avoids posterolateral rectal mobilisation and thereby minimizes the risk of postoperative constipation. Because of a perceived acceptable recurrence rate, good functional results and low mesh-related morbidity in the short to medium term, VMR has been popularized in the past decade. Laparoscopic or robotic-assisted VMR is now being progressively performed internationally and several articles and guidelines propose the procedure as the treatment of choice for rectal prolapse. In this article, an outline of the current status of laparoscopic and robotic ventral mesh rectopexy for the treatment of internal and external rectal prolapse is presented.
Collapse
|
|
41
|
Mäkelä-Kaikkonen JK, Rautio TT, Koivurova S, Pääkkö E, Ohtonen P, Biancari F, Mäkelä JT. Anatomical and functional changes to the pelvic floor after robotic versus laparoscopic ventral rectopexy: a randomised study. Int Urogynecol J 2016; 27:1837-1845. [DOI: 10.1007/s00192-016-3048-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 05/10/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
|
42
|
Abstract
Major complications only rarely occur after rectal prolapse surgery. Generally, the spectrum of possible complications should always be considered depending on the selected surgical procedure. Minor complications in all techniques have been described in up to 36 %. The commonest complication is bleeding with 2-5 %, urinary tract infections and wound infections. Finally, the risk of recurrence must be considered, which shows substantial differences (4-40 %); therefore, no operation technique can be given preference based solely on the risk of recurrence. Therapy decisions are always more individualized and must take the personal environment of the patient as well as the experience of the surgeon into consideration.
Collapse
|
|
43
|
Eftaiha S, Nordenstam J. Ventral rectopexy for rectal procidentia. SEMINARS IN COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY 2016. [DOI: 10.1053/j.scrs.2015.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
|
44
|
Tsunoda A, Takahashi T, Ohta T, Fujii W, Kusanagi H. New-onset rectoanal intussusception may not result in symptomatic improvement after laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for external rectal prolapse. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 20:101-7. [PMID: 26589950 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1395-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 09/15/2015] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was designed to assess defecatory function in patients who underwent laparoscopic ventral rectopexy (LVR) for external rectal prolapse (ERP). METHODS Thirty-one patients who underwent evacuation proctography 6 months postoperatively were assessed. Preoperative proctography had been performed in 21 patients of these patients. Defecatory function was evaluated using the constipation scoring system (CSS) and fecal incontinence severity index (FISI). RESULTS The findings of postoperative proctography revealed no full-thickness ERP in any patient, although in 10 patients the ERP was replaced by rectoanal intussusception (RAI). Of the 31 patients, 30 presented with fecal incontinence preoperatively. Ten of 30 had new-onset RAI. Six months postoperatively, a reduction of at least 50 % in the FISI score of the patients with new-onset RAI tended to be significantly smaller than in the patients without RAI (6/10 vs. 18/20, p = 0.141). Seventeen patients presented with obstructed defecation preoperatively. Seven of them had new-onset RAI. Six months postoperatively, a reduction of at least 50 % in their CSS score in the patients with new-onset RAI was significantly smaller than in patients without RAI (0/7 vs. 8/10, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Evacuation proctography showed new-onset RAI in some patients with ERP who underwent LVR, which was associated with a lack of symptomatic improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Tsunoda
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan.
| | - T Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - T Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - W Fujii
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - H Kusanagi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa City, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Pucciani F. Descending perineum syndrome: new perspectives. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19:443-8. [DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1321-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2015] [Accepted: 03/13/2015] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
|
46
|
Vujovic Z, Cuarana E, Campbell KL, Valentine N, Koch S, Ziyaie D. Lumbosacral discitis following laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: a rare but potentially serious complication. Tech Coloproctol 2015; 19:263-5. [PMID: 25720459 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-015-1279-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2014] [Accepted: 01/28/2015] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Z Vujovic
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Ninewells Hospital and Medical School, Dundee, Scotland, UK,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|