1
|
Omidi P, Cayless A, Langenbucher A. EDOF intraocular lens design: shift in image plane vs object vergence. BMC Ophthalmol 2023; 23:397. [PMID: 37784029 PMCID: PMC10544501 DOI: 10.1186/s12886-023-03144-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare 2 different design scenarios of EDOF-IOLs inserted in the Liou-Brennan schematic model eye using raytracing simulation as a function of pupil size. METHODS Two EDOF IOL designs were created and optimized for the Liou-Brennan schematic model eye using Zemax ray tracing software. Each lens was optimized to achieve a maximum Strehl ratio for intermediate and far vision. In the first scenario, the object was located at infinity (O1), and the image plane was positioned at far focus (I1) and intermediate focus (I2) to emulate far and intermediate distance vision, respectively. In the second scenario, the image plane was fixed at I1 according to the first scenario. The object plane was set to infinity (O1) for far-distance vision and then shifted closer to the eye (O2) to reproduce the corresponding intermediate vision. The performance of both IOLs was simulated for the following 3 test conditions as a function of pupil size: a) O1 to I1, b) O1 to I2, and c) O2 to I1. To evaluate the imaging performance, we used the Strehl ratio, the root-mean-square (rms) of the spot radius, and the spherical aberration of the wavefront for various pupil sizes. RESULTS Evaluating the imaging performance of the IOLs shows that the imaging performance of the IOLs is essentially identical for object/image at O1/I1. Designed IOLs perform dissimilarly to each other in near-vision scenarios, and the simulations confirm that there is a slight difference in their optical performance. CONCLUSION Our simulation study recommends considering the difference between object shift and image plane shift in design and test conditions to achieve more accurate pseudoaccommodation after cataract surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pooria Omidi
- Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, 66424, Homburg, Saarland, Germany.
| | - Alan Cayless
- School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, MK7 6AA, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Achim Langenbucher
- Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, 66424, Homburg, Saarland, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gomes J, Sapkota K, Franco S. Central and Peripheral Ocular High-Order Aberrations and Their Relationship with Accommodation and Refractive Error: A Review. Vision (Basel) 2023; 7:vision7010019. [PMID: 36977299 PMCID: PMC10054659 DOI: 10.3390/vision7010019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 02/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
High-order aberrations (HOAs) are optical defects that degrade the image quality. They change with factors such as pupil diameter, age, and accommodation. The changes in optical aberrations during accommodation are mainly due to lens shape and position changes. Primary spherical aberration (Z(4.0)) is closely related to accommodation and some studies suggested that it plays an important role in the control of accommodation. Furthermore, central and peripheral HOAs vary with refractive error and seem to influence eye growth and the onset and progression of myopia. The variations of central and peripheral HOAs during accommodation also appear to be different depending on the refractive error. Central and peripheral high-order aberrations are closely related to accommodation and influence the accuracy of the accommodative response and the progression of refractive errors, especially myopia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Gomes
- Centre of Physics, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
| | - Kishor Sapkota
- Centre of Physics, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
| | - Sandra Franco
- Centre of Physics, University of Minho, 4710-057 Braga, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li X, Hu Q, Wang QR, Feng ZQ, Yang F, Du CY. Analysis of ocular structural parameters and higher-order aberrations in Chinese children with myopia. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:8035-8043. [PMID: 34621860 PMCID: PMC8462189 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i27.8035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 07/03/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Myopia and high myopia are global public health concerns. Patients with high myopia account for 0.5%-5.0% of the global population.
AIM To examine diopters, axial length (AL), higher-order aberrations, and other ocular parameters in Chinese children with myopia, to analyze the influence of structural parameters associated with myopia on visual quality, and to provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of childhood myopia and high myopia.
METHODS This study included 195 children aged 6–17 years with myopia. The AL was measured with an ultrasonic ophthalmic diagnostic instrument, and the aberrations, corneal curvature (minimum K1, maximum K2, and average Km), central corneal thickness, anterior chamber depth, and anterior chamber angle were measured using a Sirius three-dimensional anterior segment analyzer. Using a standard formula, the corneal radius of curvature R (337.3/Km) and AL/R values were obtained.
RESULTS The diopter of high myopia compared with low-middle myopia was correlated with age and AL (r = -0.336, -0.405, P < 0.001), and AL of high myopia was negatively correlated with K1, K2, and Km (r = -0.673, -0.661, and -0.680, respectively; P < 0.001), and positively correlated with age and the anterior chamber depth (r = 0.214 and 0.275, respectively; P < 0.05). AL/R was more closely related to diopter than AL in children with myopia, and 94.4% of children with myopia had an AL/R of > 3.00.
CONCLUSION The ocular structural parameters of children change because of different diopters. AL/R is more specific and sensitive than AL in evaluating the refractive status of myopia in children. An AL/R of > 3.00 may be used as a specific index of myopia in children. There are differences in AL/R between high myopia and low-middle myopia, which can be used for the classification of ametropia. The degree of myopia has a certain influence on higher-order aberrations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Center of Optometry of The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Qi Hu
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030000, Shanxi Province, China
| | - Qian-Ru Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Zi-Qing Feng
- Department of Ophthalmology, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, State Key Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510000, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Fan Yang
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Center of Optometry of The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Chun-Yu Du
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Center of Optometry of The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150000, Heilongjiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Langenbucher A, Eppig T, Cayless A, Gatzioufas Z, Wendelstein J, Hoffmann P, Szentmáry N. Simulation of Corneal imaging properties for near objects. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2021; 41:1152-1160. [PMID: 34418877 DOI: 10.1111/opo.12861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using raytracing simulation to study the effect of corneal imaging metrics for different aperture sizes as a function of object distances with different schematic model eyes. METHODS This raytracing simulation determined the best focus (with the least root-mean-square (rms) ray scatter) and the best wavefront focus (with least rms wavefront error) for four schematic model eyes (Liou-Brennan (LBME), Atchison (ATCHME), Gullstrand (GULLME) and Navarro (NAVME)) with 4 aperture sizes (2-5 mm) and 30 object distances in a logscale from 10 cm to 10 m plus infinity. For each configuration, 10,000 rays were traced through the cornea, and the aperture stop was located at the lens front apex plane as described in the model eyes. The wavefront was decomposed into Zernike components to extract the spherical aberration term. RESULTS The focal distance with respect to the corneal front apex increases from around 31 mm for objects at infinity to around 40 mm for objects at 10 cm. The best (wavefront) focus was systematically closer to the cornea compared with the paraxial focus, and the overestimation of focal length with the paraxial focus was larger for large aperture sizes and small object distances. The rms ray scatter and wavefront error were both systematically larger with large aperture and small object sizes. At best focus the rms wavefront error was systematically larger, and the rms ray scatter was systematically smaller compared to the best wavefront focus. Spherical aberration varied more with GULLME than with LBME or NAVME, and increased strongly at smaller object distances. CONCLUSIONS The imaging properties of the cornea, especially spherical aberration, increase strongly as the object distance decreases. This effect should be considered, especially when considering aberration correcting lenses for near vision such as multifocal or enhanced depth of focus lenses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achim Langenbucher
- Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Timo Eppig
- Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Alan Cayless
- School of Physical Sciences, The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
| | - Zisis Gatzioufas
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Jascha Wendelstein
- Department of Ophthalmology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Peter Hoffmann
- Augen- und Laserklinik Castrop-Rauxel, Castrop-Rauxel, Germany
| | - Nóra Szentmáry
- Dr Rolf M Schwiete Center for Limbal Stem Cell and Aniridia Research, Saarland University, Homburg/Saar, Germany.,Department of Ophthalmology, Semmelweis-University, Budapest, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Herbaut A, Liang H, Denoyer A, Baudouin C, Labbé A. [Tear film analysis and evaluation of optical quality: A review of the literature (French translation of the article)]. J Fr Ophtalmol 2019; 42:226-243. [PMID: 30879832 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2018] [Revised: 10/15/2018] [Accepted: 10/22/2018] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
Dry eye is a complex multifactorial disease of the ocular surface and tears. It is associated with ocular surface symptoms and is one of the most common causes for ophthalmologic consultation. Despite their frequent use in clinical practice, the usual tests to evaluate dry eye and ocular surface disease-history of symptoms, tear break-up time (TBUT), Meibomian gland evaluation, corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer test-have shown low reproducibility and reliability. In addition, subjective symptoms are often weakly or poorly correlated with objective signs. Since the tear film is the first system through which light must pass, the optical quality of the eye is highly dependent on the homogeneity of the tear film. Various investigative methods have been developed to evaluate both the structural and functional quality of the tear film, such as corneal topography, interferometry, tear meniscus measurement, evaporation rate, tear osmolarity and even aberrometry. Some are easily accessible to clinicians, while others remain in the field of clinical research. All of these tests provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the tear film. This review hopes to provide an overview of the existing tests and their role in evaluating the significance of the tear film in visual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Herbaut
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU Sight Restore, Paris, France
| | - H Liang
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU Sight Restore, Paris, France; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeRestore, INSERM-DHOS CIC 1423, Paris, France; Inserm, U968; UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la Vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, INSERMDHOS CIC 503, Paris, France
| | - A Denoyer
- Inserm, U968; UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la Vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, INSERMDHOS CIC 503, Paris, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, CHU Robert Debré, Université Reims, Champagne-Ardenne, Reims, France
| | - C Baudouin
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU Sight Restore, Paris, France; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeRestore, INSERM-DHOS CIC 1423, Paris, France; Inserm, U968; UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la Vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, INSERMDHOS CIC 503, Paris, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, AP-HP, université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France
| | - A Labbé
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU Sight Restore, Paris, France; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeRestore, INSERM-DHOS CIC 1423, Paris, France; Inserm, U968; UPMC Université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la Vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, INSERMDHOS CIC 503, Paris, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, AP-HP, université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Versailles, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Herbaut A, Liang H, Denoyer A, Baudouin C, Labbé A. Tear film analysis and evaluation of optical quality: A review of the literature. J Fr Ophtalmol 2019; 42:e21-e35. [PMID: 30679123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfo.2018.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 12/11/2018] [Accepted: 12/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Dry eye is a complex multifactorial disease of the ocular surface and tears. It is associated with ocular surface symptoms and is one of the most common causes for ophthalmologic consultation. Despite their frequent use in clinical practice, the usual tests to evaluate dry eye and ocular surface disease-history of symptoms, tear break-up time (TBUT), Meibomian gland evaluation, corneal fluorescein staining, Schirmer test-have shown low reproducibility and reliability. In addition, subjective symptoms are often weakly or poorly correlated with objective signs. Since the tear film is the first system through which light must pass, the optical quality of the eye is highly dependent on the homogeneity of the tear film. Various investigative methods have been developed to evaluate both the structural and functional quality of the tear film, such as corneal topography, interferometry, tear meniscus measurement, evaporation rate, tear osmolarity and even aberrometry. Some are easily accessible to clinicians, while others remain in the field of clinical research. All of these tests provide a better understanding of the pathophysiology of the tear film. This review hopes to provide an overview of the existing tests and their role in evaluating the significance of the tear film in visual function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Herbaut
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeSight, 75012 Paris, France
| | - H Liang
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeSight, 75012 Paris, France; Inserm-DHOS CIC 1423CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeSight, 75012 Paris, France; Inserm, U968; UPMC, université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, Inserm-DHOS CIC 503, 75012 Paris, France
| | - A Denoyer
- Inserm, U968; UPMC, université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, Inserm-DHOS CIC 503, 75012 Paris, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, CHU Robert-Debré, université Reims, Champagne-Ardenne, 51100 Reims, France
| | - C Baudouin
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeSight, 75012 Paris, France; Inserm-DHOS CIC 1423CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeSight, 75012 Paris, France; Inserm, U968; UPMC, université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, Inserm-DHOS CIC 503, 75012 Paris, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, AP-HP, 78000 Versailles, France
| | - A Labbé
- Service d'ophtalmologie III, CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeSight, 75012 Paris, France; Inserm-DHOS CIC 1423CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, IHU ForeSight, 75012 Paris, France; Inserm, U968; UPMC, université Paris 06, UMR_S968, institut de la vision; CNRS, UMR 7210; CHNO des Quinze-Vingts, Inserm-DHOS CIC 503, 75012 Paris, France; Service d'ophtalmologie, hôpital Ambroise-Paré, université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, AP-HP, 78000 Versailles, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Neroev VV, Tarutta EP, Harutyunyan SG, Khandzhyan AT, Khodzhabekyan NV, Proskurina OV. [Wavefront and accommodation parameters under different conditions of correction in myopia and hyperopia]. Vestn Oftalmol 2018; 134:15-20. [PMID: 30499534 DOI: 10.17116/oftalma201813405115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the wavefront and accommodation parameters without correction and in soft contact lenses (SCL) in natural and cycloplegic conditions in eyes with myopia and hyperopia. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 142 myopic (mean -5.6±1.4 D) and 48 hyperopic (mean +3.5±1.1 D) eyes were examined in 95 patients aged 5-32 years (mean age 16.9±0.9 years) to compare the wavefront aberrations without correction and with different SCL before and after cycloplegia (two drops of cyclopentolate hydrochloride 1%). The device was set up for 4 mm zone for both narrow and wide pupils. To compare the accommodation parameters under different correction conditions, 85 patients aged 8-23 years (mean age 14.9±0.6 years) with average myopia of (-)5.27±1.4D (123 eyes) and average hyperopia of +3.53±1.2 D (46 eyes) were chosen from the study group. Among the measured parameters are objective accommodative response (OAR), relative accommodation reserves (RAR), pseudoaccumulation amplitude (PA), higher-order aberrations: RMSHOAs, 6-9 Trefoil, 7-8 Coma, spherical aberration (SA). RESULTS In myopic eyes with SCL Coma 7 decreases, Coma 8 increases with transition to positive values, and Trefoil 9 increases. In hyperopic eyes, trefoil 6 decreases, Coma 7-8 go negative. In myopic or hyperopic eyes with SCL, SA goes from positive to negative. In both myopia and hyperopia, accommodation and PA rates are higher in SCL than in glasses. CONCLUSION SCL change certain wavefront parameters for myopia and hyperopia in different ways. The accommodation parameters in SCL are elevated in both myopia and hyperopia. The negative spherical aberration induced by contact lenses improves the accommodative response. The revealed features should be considered in the development of correction methods that target refractogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V V Neroev
- Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - E P Tarutta
- Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - S G Harutyunyan
- Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - A T Khandzhyan
- Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - N V Khodzhabekyan
- Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - O V Proskurina
- Helmholtz Moscow Research Institute of Eye Diseases, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ke B, Mao X, Jiang H, He J, Liu C, Li M, Yuan Y, Wang J. The Relationship Between High-Order Aberration and Anterior Ocular Biometry During Accommodation in Young Healthy Adults. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2017; 58:5628-5635. [PMID: 29094166 PMCID: PMC5667401 DOI: 10.1167/iovs.17-21712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study investigated the anterior ocular anatomic origin of high-order aberration (HOA) components using optical coherence tomography and a Shack-Hartmann wavefront sensor. Methods A customized system was built to simultaneously capture images of ocular wavefront aberrations and anterior ocular biometry. Relaxed, 2-diopter (D) and 4-D accommodative states were repeatedly measured in 30 young subjects. Custom software was used to correct optical distortions and measure biometric parameters from the images. Results The anterior ocular biometry changed during 2-D accommodation, in which central lens thickness, ciliary muscle thicknesses at 1 mm posterior to the scleral spur (CMT1), and the maximum value of ciliary muscle thickness increased significantly, whereas anterior chamber depth, CMT3, radius of anterior lens surface curvature (RAL), and radius of posterior lens surface curvature (RPL) decreased significantly. The changes in the anterior ocular parameters during 4-D accommodation were similar to those for the 2-D accommodation. \begin{document}\newcommand{\bialpha}{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\newcommand{\bibeta}{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\newcommand{\bigamma}{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\newcommand{\bidelta}{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\newcommand{\bivarepsilon}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\newcommand{\bizeta}{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\newcommand{\bieta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\newcommand{\bitheta}{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\newcommand{\biiota}{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\newcommand{\bikappa}{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\newcommand{\bilambda}{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\newcommand{\bimu}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\newcommand{\binu}{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\newcommand{\bixi}{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\newcommand{\biomicron}{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\newcommand{\bipi}{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\newcommand{\birho}{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\newcommand{\bisigma}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\newcommand{\bitau}{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\newcommand{\biupsilon}{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\newcommand{\biphi}{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\newcommand{\bichi}{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\newcommand{\bipsi}{\boldsymbol{\psi}}\newcommand{\biomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\({\rm Z}_4^0\)\end{document} decreased significantly during 2-D accommodation, and \begin{document}\newcommand{\bialpha}{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\newcommand{\bibeta}{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\newcommand{\bigamma}{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\newcommand{\bidelta}{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\newcommand{\bivarepsilon}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\newcommand{\bizeta}{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\newcommand{\bieta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\newcommand{\bitheta}{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\newcommand{\biiota}{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\newcommand{\bikappa}{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\newcommand{\bilambda}{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\newcommand{\bimu}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\newcommand{\binu}{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\newcommand{\bixi}{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\newcommand{\biomicron}{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\newcommand{\bipi}{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\newcommand{\birho}{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\newcommand{\bisigma}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\newcommand{\bitau}{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\newcommand{\biupsilon}{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\newcommand{\biphi}{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\newcommand{\bichi}{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\newcommand{\bipsi}{\boldsymbol{\psi}}\newcommand{\biomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\({\rm{Z}}_3^{ - 1}\)\end{document}, \begin{document}\newcommand{\bialpha}{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\newcommand{\bibeta}{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\newcommand{\bigamma}{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\newcommand{\bidelta}{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\newcommand{\bivarepsilon}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\newcommand{\bizeta}{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\newcommand{\bieta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\newcommand{\bitheta}{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\newcommand{\biiota}{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\newcommand{\bikappa}{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\newcommand{\bilambda}{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\newcommand{\bimu}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\newcommand{\binu}{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\newcommand{\bixi}{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\newcommand{\biomicron}{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\newcommand{\bipi}{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\newcommand{\birho}{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\newcommand{\bisigma}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\newcommand{\bitau}{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\newcommand{\biupsilon}{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\newcommand{\biphi}{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\newcommand{\bichi}{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\newcommand{\bipsi}{\boldsymbol{\psi}}\newcommand{\biomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\({\rm{Z}}_3^1\)\end{document}, \begin{document}\newcommand{\bialpha}{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\newcommand{\bibeta}{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\newcommand{\bigamma}{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\newcommand{\bidelta}{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\newcommand{\bivarepsilon}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\newcommand{\bizeta}{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\newcommand{\bieta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\newcommand{\bitheta}{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\newcommand{\biiota}{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\newcommand{\bikappa}{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\newcommand{\bilambda}{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\newcommand{\bimu}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\newcommand{\binu}{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\newcommand{\bixi}{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\newcommand{\biomicron}{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\newcommand{\bipi}{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\newcommand{\birho}{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\newcommand{\bisigma}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\newcommand{\bitau}{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\newcommand{\biupsilon}{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\newcommand{\biphi}{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\newcommand{\bichi}{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\newcommand{\bipsi}{\boldsymbol{\psi}}\newcommand{\biomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\({\rm{Z}}_4^0\)\end{document}, and \begin{document}\newcommand{\bialpha}{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\newcommand{\bibeta}{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\newcommand{\bigamma}{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\newcommand{\bidelta}{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\newcommand{\bivarepsilon}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\newcommand{\bizeta}{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\newcommand{\bieta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\newcommand{\bitheta}{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\newcommand{\biiota}{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\newcommand{\bikappa}{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\newcommand{\bilambda}{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\newcommand{\bimu}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\newcommand{\binu}{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\newcommand{\bixi}{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\newcommand{\biomicron}{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\newcommand{\bipi}{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\newcommand{\birho}{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\newcommand{\bisigma}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\newcommand{\bitau}{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\newcommand{\biupsilon}{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\newcommand{\biphi}{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\newcommand{\bichi}{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\newcommand{\bipsi}{\boldsymbol{\psi}}\newcommand{\biomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\({\rm{Z}}_6^0\)\end{document} shifted to negative values during 4-D accommodation. The change in \begin{document}\newcommand{\bialpha}{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\newcommand{\bibeta}{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\newcommand{\bigamma}{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\newcommand{\bidelta}{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\newcommand{\bivarepsilon}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\newcommand{\bizeta}{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\newcommand{\bieta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\newcommand{\bitheta}{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\newcommand{\biiota}{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\newcommand{\bikappa}{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\newcommand{\bilambda}{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\newcommand{\bimu}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\newcommand{\binu}{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\newcommand{\bixi}{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\newcommand{\biomicron}{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\newcommand{\bipi}{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\newcommand{\birho}{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\newcommand{\bisigma}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\newcommand{\bitau}{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\newcommand{\biupsilon}{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\newcommand{\biphi}{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\newcommand{\bichi}{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\newcommand{\bipsi}{\boldsymbol{\psi}}\newcommand{\biomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\({\rm{Z}}_4^0\)\end{document} negatively correlated with those in CMT1, and the negative change in \begin{document}\newcommand{\bialpha}{\boldsymbol{\alpha}}\newcommand{\bibeta}{\boldsymbol{\beta}}\newcommand{\bigamma}{\boldsymbol{\gamma}}\newcommand{\bidelta}{\boldsymbol{\delta}}\newcommand{\bivarepsilon}{\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}}\newcommand{\bizeta}{\boldsymbol{\zeta}}\newcommand{\bieta}{\boldsymbol{\eta}}\newcommand{\bitheta}{\boldsymbol{\theta}}\newcommand{\biiota}{\boldsymbol{\iota}}\newcommand{\bikappa}{\boldsymbol{\kappa}}\newcommand{\bilambda}{\boldsymbol{\lambda}}\newcommand{\bimu}{\boldsymbol{\mu}}\newcommand{\binu}{\boldsymbol{\nu}}\newcommand{\bixi}{\boldsymbol{\xi}}\newcommand{\biomicron}{\boldsymbol{\micron}}\newcommand{\bipi}{\boldsymbol{\pi}}\newcommand{\birho}{\boldsymbol{\rho}}\newcommand{\bisigma}{\boldsymbol{\sigma}}\newcommand{\bitau}{\boldsymbol{\tau}}\newcommand{\biupsilon}{\boldsymbol{\upsilon}}\newcommand{\biphi}{\boldsymbol{\phi}}\newcommand{\bichi}{\boldsymbol{\chi}}\newcommand{\bipsi}{\boldsymbol{\psi}}\newcommand{\biomega}{\boldsymbol{\omega}}\({\rm{Z}}_3^1\)\end{document} correlated with changes in RAL and CMT1. Conclusions HOA components altered during step-controlled accommodative stimuli. Ciliary muscle first contracted during stepwise accommodation, which may directly contribute to the reduction of spherical aberration (SA). The lens morphology was then altered, and the change in anterior lens surface curvature was related to the variation of coma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bilian Ke
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
| | - Xinjie Mao
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States.,School of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
| | - Hong Jiang
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
| | - Jichang He
- New England College of Optometry, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
| | - Che Liu
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
| | - Min Li
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying Yuan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianhua Wang
- Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Neroev VV, Tarutta EP, Arutyunyan SG, Khandzhyan AT, Khodzhabekyan NV. [Wavefront aberrations and accommodation in myopes and hyperopes]. Vestn Oftalmol 2017; 133:5-9. [PMID: 28524133 DOI: 10.17116/oftalma201713324-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
AIM to comparatively investigate accommodation, pseudoaccommodation, and higher-order aberrations in children and young adults with myopia and hyperopia. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 39 myopic (the mean error of (-)5.2±1.5 diopters) and 53 hyperopic (the mean error of (+)3.1±1.15 diopters) eyes of 46 patients aged 5-20 years (11.6±0.6 years on average) were enrolled. Examination included evaluation of the objective accommodative response, relative accommodation reserves, pseudoaccommodation volume (calculated as the difference between the (+)3.0-diopter lens that is necessary for cycloplegic reading at a 33-cm distance and the weakest possible plus lens that enables reading), and higher-order aberrations (HOA), particularly the root mean square (RMS) value, vertical and horizontal trefoil, vertical and horizontal coma (coma7, coma8), and spherical aberration (SA). RESULTS Both objective and subjective parameters of accommodation were reliably lower in myopia as compared to hyperopia, while wavefront aberrations (RMS HOA, vertical trefoil, coma7) and pseudoaccommodation - reliably greater. SA was found to be reliably more pronounced in those myopes, who demonstrated larger volume of pseudoaccommodation. At the same time, there was a mismatch in wavefront parameters of myopes and hyperopes at different levels of accommodation and pseudoaccommodation. In myopic eyes, vertical trefoil decreased down to negative values as the accommodative response improved. In contrast to that, in hyperopic eyes with large volume of pseudoaccommodation, SA decreased below zero. CONCLUSION Myopia has been shown to be associated with reduced accommodation parameters as well as stronger HOA and pseudoaccommodation. Wavefront and accommodation parameters interrelations differ in myopic and hyperopic eyes. The nuances revealed should be taken into account when developing correction methods that purposefully influence refractogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- V V Neroev
- Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - E P Tarutta
- Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - S G Arutyunyan
- Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - A T Khandzhyan
- Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| | - N V Khodzhabekyan
- Moscow Helmholtz Research Institute of Eye Diseases, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 14/19 Sadovaya-Chernogryazskaya St., Moscow, Russian Federation, 105062
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Change in Accommodation and Ocular Aberrations in Keratoconus Patients Fitted With Scleral Lenses. Eye Contact Lens 2016; 44 Suppl 1:S50-S53. [PMID: 27607148 DOI: 10.1097/icl.0000000000000317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the accommodative response to different accommodative stimulus and to determine the changes in ocular higher-order aberrations with accommodation in keratoconus patients fitted with mini scleral lenses. MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included 15 keratoconus patients wearing mini scleral lenses (Misa Scleral Lens-Microlens, Arnhem, the Netherlands) and 15 keratoconus patients wearing rigid gas permeable lenses. Hartmannn Shack aberrometer (IRX-3; Imagine Eyes, Orsay, France) was used for the evaluation of accommodation. Accommodative responses to the accommodative stimulus ranging from 0.5 to 5.0 diopters (D) with intervals of 0.5 D were recorded. Spherical, coma, trefoil aberration, and root mean square (RMS) of total higher-order aberrations (HOAs, third to sixth orders) at baseline, at 2.5 D stimulus, and at 5 D stimulus were also recorded. RESULTS Although accommodative response to accommodative stimulus of 0.5 to 2.5 D (with 0.5 D intervals) was similar in both groups, accommodative response to accommodative stimulus of 3.0 to 5.0 D was significantly lower in keratoconus group wearing mini scleral lenses. The coma, spherical, trefoil aberrations, and the RMS of total HOAs at baseline, at 2.5 D stimulus, and at 5 D stimulus were not significantly different between the groups. However, changes in the coma and trefoil aberrations and RMS of total HOA with 2.5 D and 5.0 D stimulus were significant only in the RGP group. CONCLUSIONS Accommodative response to increasing accommodative stimulus was found to be impaired in keratoconus patients wearing mini scleral lenses.
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhou XY, Wang L, Zhou XT, Yu ZQ. Wavefront aberration changes caused by a gradient of increasing accommodation stimuli. Eye (Lond) 2014; 29:115-21. [PMID: 25341432 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2014.244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2014] [Accepted: 09/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to investigate the wavefront aberration changes in human eyes caused by a gradient of increasing accommodation stimuli. DESIGN This is a prospective, single-site study. METHODS Healthy volunteers (n=22) aged 18-28 years whose refraction states were emmetropia or mild myopia, with astigmatism <1 diopter (D), were included in this study. After dilating the right pupil with 0.5% phenylephrine drops, the wavefront aberration of the right eye was measured continuously either without or with 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6D accommodation stimuli (WFA1000B psychophysical aberrometer). The root mean square (RMS) values of the total wavefront aberrations, higher-order aberrations, and 35 individual Zernike aberrations under different accommodation stimuli were calculated and compared. RESULTS The average induced accommodations using 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, or 6D accommodation stimuli were 0.848, 1.626, 2.375, 3.249, 4.181, or 5.085 D, respectively. The RMS of total wavefront aberrations, as well as higher-order aberrations, showed no significant effects with 1-3 D accommodation stimuli, but increased significantly under 4, 5, and 6 D accommodation stimuli compared with relaxed accommodation. Zernike coefficients of significantly decreased with increasing levels of accommodation. CONCLUSION Higher-order wavefront aberrations in human eyes changed with increased accommodation. These results are consistent with Schachar's accommodation theory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X-Y Zhou
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - L Wang
- Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - X-T Zhou
- 1] Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China [2] Key Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| | - Z-Q Yu
- 1] Department of Ophthalmology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China [2] Key Laboratory of Myopia, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|