Recurrent Patellar Dislocation (RPD) is a common knee sports injury, mainly affecting pediatric and adolescent populations, posing a significant challenge in orthopedic clinical practice. Although a variety of treatments have been reported, and many of them have shown good initial results, there is a lack of long-term follow-up results. Each treatment method has its own unique characteristics and limitations, and there is no standardized and unified treatment plan. This article provides a comprehensive review of current treatments for RPD. We believe that regardless of the surgical method used, patellar dislocation should not occur at 0°-90° of postoperative knee flexion and extension, and the range of motion should not be limited. Our ultimate goal is to restore patellar stability and improve lower limb alignment, thereby restoring knee function as much as possible. In addition, future treatment options for RPD are also discussed. In the future, there should be more in-depth research on the risk factors and pathogenesis that lead to recurrent patellar dislocation, as well as more randomized controlled trials focusing on different treatment methods. A comprehensive understanding of these is crucial for implementing preventive measures and developing targeted treatment strategies. The goal of this narrative review is to offer clinicians a deeper understanding of RPD treatment, enhance clinical decision-making skills, and encourage personalized and efficient management of RPD treatment.

Patellar instability represents a common problem with an evolving understanding and multifactorial pathoetiology. Treatment plans should be based on the identification of contributing anatomical factors and tailored to each individual patient.

Risks for recurrent instability are dependent on several patient-specific factors including patella alta, increased tibial tubercle-to-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, trochlear dysplasia, younger skeletal age, and ligamentous laxity.

Cartilage or osteochondral lesions and/or fractures are commonly observed in first-time patellar dislocation, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) should be strongly considered. Advanced imaging modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) or MRI, should also be obtained preoperatively to identify predisposing factors and guide surgical treatment.

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction with anatomical femoral tunnel positioning is associated with lower recurrence rates compared with MPFL repair and has become a common and successful reconstructive surgical option in cases of instability.

Lateral retinacular tightness can be addressed with lateral retinacular release or lengthening, but these procedures should not be performed in isolation.

Tibial tubercle osteotomy is a powerful reconstructive tool in the setting of underlying skeletal risk factors for instability and can be of particular benefit in the presence of increased TT-TG distance (>20 mm), and/or in the setting of patella alta.

The indications for trochleoplasty are still developing along with the clinical evidence, but trochleoplasty may be indicated in some cases of severe trochlear dysplasia. Several surgical techniques have indications in specific clinical scenarios and populations, and indications, risks, and benefits to each are progressing with our understanding.

Combined femoral derotational osteotomy and MPFL reconstruction can be considered for patients with a femoral anteversion angle of >30° to improve patient outcomes and reduce recurrence rates.

To describe the femoral insertion of the ACL using the posterior proximal cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle as the anatomical reference.

Twenty knees were dissected. The X-axis (deep-shallow) and Y-axis (high-low) were determined using the femoral diaphysis and the proximal cartilage of the lateral femoral condyle (point C) as a reference, which were easily identified by direct visualization through the anteromedial portal. The distances to the center of the anteromedial and posterolateral bands and to the center of the ACL were measured.

The mean distances were 7.2 mm (SD: 0.7) between the center of the anteromedial bundle and the Y-axis (AM-Y), 9 mm (SD: 1.1) between the center of the ACL and the Y-axis (M-Y), and 12.7 mm (SD: 0.9) between the center of the posterolateral bundle and the Y-axis (PL-Y). Regarding the distance (from point C to the distal cartilage along the X-axis), the center of the anteromedial bundle (AM) was 35% (SD: 4.9%), the center of the posterolateral bundle was 62% (SD: 3.7%), and the center of the ACL (M) was 44% (SD: 7%) of the CD distance on average.

Given the similarity among the specimens in terms of the height of the ACL on the Y-axis in relation to the proximal posterior cartilage of the femoral lateral condyle (point C), this point can be used as an arthroscopic intraoperative parameter to define the position of the femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction for single- or double-bundle techniques.

The knowledge of the anatomy and biomechanics of patellar stabilizers is mandatory to achieve good clinical results with surgical reconstructive procedures. Few articles provide clear anatomical and biomechanical picture of medial patello-tibial ligament (MPTL).

After a systematic review of the literature we selected in vivo or ex vivo studies providing anatomical or biomechanical measurements. We included 7 studies about MPTL anatomy for a total of 96 knees and 4 biomechanical studies.

The MPTL is a true ligament and important component of the medial patellar stabilizers, together with the medial patello-femoral ligament (MPFL) and medial patello-meniscal ligament. The contribution of MPTL on restriction forces of the patello-femoral joint is still unclear. Quadriceps, patellar, semitendinous and gracilis tendons are adequate grafts for surgical MPTL reconstruction.

MPTL is a well defined anathomical structure and histologically can be considered a ligament. It plays an important role in patellar stability especially it has a main role on patellar rotation and tilt instead on shift.

To biomechanically evaluate MPTL reconstruction and compare it with two techniques for MPFL reconstruction in regard to changes in patellofemoral contact pressures and restoration of patellar stability.

This is an experimental laboratory study in eight human cadaveric knees. None had patellofemoral cartilage lesions or trochlear dysplasia as evaluated by conventional radiographs and MRI examinations. The specimens were secured in a testing apparatus, and the quadriceps was tensioned in line with the femoral shaft. Contact pressures were measured using the TekScan sensor at 30°, 60° and 90°. The sensor was placed in the patellofemoral joint through a proximal approach between femoral shaft and quadriceps tendon to not violate the medial and lateral patellofemoral complex. TekScan data were analysed to determine mean contact pressures on the medial and lateral patellar facets. Patellar lateral displacement was evaluated with the knee positioned at 30° of flexion and 9 N of quadriceps load, then a lateral force of 22 N was applied. The same protocol was used for each condition: native, medial patellofemoral complex lesion, medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) using gracilis tendon, MPFL-R using quadriceps tendon transfer, and medial patellotibial ligament reconstruction (MPTL-R) using patellar tendon transfer.

No statistical differences were found for mean and peak contact pressures, medial or lateral, among all three techniques. However, while both techniques of MPFL-R were able to restore the medial restraint, MPTL-R failed to restore resistance to lateral patellar translation to the native state (mean lateralization of the patella [mm]: native: 9.4; lesion: 22; gracilis MPFL-R: 8.1; quadriceps MPFL-R: 11.3; MPTL-R: 23.4 (p < 0.001).

MPTL-R and both techniques for MPFL-R did not increase patellofemoral contact pressures; however, MPTL-R failed to provide a sufficient restraint against lateral patellar translation lateral translation in 30° of flexion. It, therefore, cannot be recommended as an isolated procedure for the treatment of patellar instability.

Accurate assessment of the locations of patellar avulsion fractures in acute patellar dislocations is clinically relevant for decision making for treatment. The study aim was to classify the locations of patellar avulsion fractures with a focus on the ligament attachments of medial stabilizing structures.

Out of 131 first-time acute traumatic patellar dislocations, 61 patients had patellar fractures. Subsequently, 10 patients with isolated osteochondral fractures of the articular surface in the patella were excluded. Finally, 51 patients (34 females and 17 males, average age: 18.5 years, 95% CI 16.1-20.9) were included in the study cohort. Based on the locations of the patellar attachment, the patients were divided into three groups: the superior group [medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) attachment], inferior group [medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL)/medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) attachment], and mixed group.

In the patellar avulsion group (51 patients), the superior group, mixed group, and inferior group contained 8/51 (16%), 12/51 (24%), and 31/51 (61%) patients, respectively.

This study showed that 84% of the patellar avulsion fractures were located in the inferomedial patellar border, which consisted of MPTL/MPML attachments that were clearly different from the true "MPFL" attachment at the superomedial patellar border. In terms of the clinical relevance, the acute surgical repair of MPTL/MPML attachments in the inferomedial patellar border may not sufficiently control the patella if optimal management of the MPFL is not performed.

IV.

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) works in association with the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and the medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) to impart stability to the patellofemoral joint. The anatomy and biomechanical characteristics of the MPFL have been well described but little is known about the MPTL and MPML. Several reconstruction procedures of the MPFL with semitendinosus, gracilis, patellar and quadriceps tendons, allografts and synthetic grafts have been described. No clear superiority of one surgical technique over another is evident.

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were articles that reported clinical outcomes of combined reconstruction of MPTL and MPFL. The methodological quality of the articles was determined using the modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS).

Nine articles were included, reporting the clinical outcomes of 197 operated knees. The surgical procedures described include hamstrings grafting and transfer of the medial patellar and quadriceps tendons with or without bony procedures to reconstruct the MPTL in association with the MPFL. Overall, good and excellent outcomes were achieved. The median CMS is 70.6 ± 14.4 (range 38 to 84).

Different techniques are reported, and outcomes are good with low rates of recurrence. The quality of the articles is variable, ranging from low to high. Appropriately powered randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand what the adequate indications for surgery in patients with patellar instability and clinical outcomes are. Combined reconstruction of MPFL and MPTL leads to favourable clinical outcomes, supporting its role as a valid surgical procedure for patellar stabilization.

The important medial patellar ligamentous restraints to lateral dislocation are the proximal group (the medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament and the medial patellofemoral ligament) and the distal group [medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML)]. The MPTL patellar insertion is at inferomedial border of patella and tibial insertion is in the anteromedial tibia. The MPML originates in the inferomedial patella, right proximal to the MPTL, inserting in the medial meniscus. On the basis of anatomy and biomechanical studies, the MPTL and MPML are more important in 2 moments during knee range of motion: terminal extension, when it directly counteracts quadriceps contraction. In a systematic review on MPTL reconstructions 19 articles were included detailing the clinical outcomes of 403 knees. All were case series. Overall, good and excellent outcomes were achieved in >75% of cohorts in most studies and redislocations were <10%, with or without the association of the medial patellofemoral ligament. The MPTL is a relevant additional tool to proximal restraint reconstruction in select patient profiles; however, more definitive clinical studies are necessary to better define surgical indications.

The scientific literature concerning the anatomy of medial soft-tissue stabilizers of the patella is growing exponentially. Much of the surgical literature has focused on the role of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and techniques to reconstruct it, yet our understanding of its anatomy has evolved during the past several years. Given this, we report on the current understanding of medial patellofemoral anatomy and implications for reconstruction.

Current and historical studies of medial patellar anatomy were reviewed, which include the MPFL and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL), as well as that of the distal medial patellar restraints, the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML). In addition to the reported findings, the authors' anatomic descriptions of each ligament during their dissections were identified and recorded.

Despite the name of the MPFL, which implies that the ligament courses between the femur and patella, recent studies have highlighted the proximal MPFL fibers that attach to the quadriceps tendon, known as the MQTFL. The MPFL and MQTFL have also been referred to as the medial patellofemoral complex, reflecting the variability in anatomical attachment sites. The MPFL accounts for only half of the total restraint to lateral patellar displacement, and the remaining contributions to patellar stability are derived from the combination of the MPTL and MPML, which function primarily in greater degrees of knee flexion.

The understanding of the complexity of the medial patellar stabilizers continues to evolve. Although MPFL reconstruction is gaining wide acceptance as a procedure to treat patellar instability, it is important to recognize the complex and changing understanding of the anatomy of the medial soft-tissue stabilizers and the implications for reconstruction.

V.

To report outcomes after combined medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) reconstruction and test associations between prognostic factors and clinical outcomes. It was hypothesised that combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction would result in significant improvement in function, and that outcomes would be associated with age, sex, Beighton score, concomitant articular lesions, and preoperative function.

All combined reconstructions of MPFL and MPTL were reviewed. Inclusion criterion was minimum 2-year follow-up. Exclusion criteria were age at surgery ≥ 35 years and concomitant osteotomies. Kujala, Tegner and Marx scores were completed prospectively. Patients were evaluated at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Associations between potential prognostic factors and Kujala and Tegner scores were tested using bivariate analyses followed by multivariate regression models.

Of 22 patients (26 knees), 19 (23 knees) met inclusion criteria, and 16 (20 knees) were available for follow-up. Mean age at surgery was 18 years (range 14.5-23). Mean follow-up was 43 months (range 24-73). Postoperative Kujala score significantly improved compared to before surgery (86.4 ± 12.5 vs. 54.9 ± 15.2, p < 0.01). Postoperative Tegner score was nonsignificantly higher compared to before surgery (4.8 ± 2.4 vs. 4 ± 3, p = ns) and lower compared to before first patella dislocation (4.8 ± 2.4 vs. 5.9 ± 1.2, p < 0.01). Postoperative Kujala score was associated with male sex (p = 0.02), with medial patellofemoral chondral lesions (p = 0.01) and with preoperative Kujala score (p = 0.05). Postoperative Tegner score was associated with male sex (p < 0.01), with preoperative Tegner level (p < 0.01), and with Beighton score (p < 0.01). Patella apprehension was recorded in two knees (10%) in two patients.

Combined MPFL and MPTL reconstruction in young adults results in significant improvement in subjective knee function with minimal risks, although preinjury activity levels are not consistently restored. Associated factors of improved outcome include higher preoperative knee scores and activity levels, medial patellofemoral chondral lesions, decreased Beighton scores, and male sex. This supports the advisability of the procedure and can also assist in setting realistic goals for specific groups of patients.

Case series, Level IV.

The medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL), the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), and the medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) support the stability of the patellofemoral joint. The purpose of this systematic review was to report the surgical techniques and clinical outcomes of the repair or reconstruction of the MPTL in isolation or concomitant with the MPFL and/or other procedures.

A systematic review of the literature was conducted. Inclusion criteria were articles in the English language that reported clinical outcomes of the reconstruction of the MPTL in isolation or in combination with the MPFL and/or other procedures. Included articles were then cross-referenced to find additional journal articles not found in the initial search. The methodological quality of the articles was determined using the Coleman Methodology Score.

Nineteen articles were included detailing the clinical outcomes of 403 knees. The surgical procedures described included hamstrings tenodesis with or without other major procedures, medial transfer of the medial patellar tendon with or without other major procedures and the reconstruction of the MPTL in association with the MPFL. Overall, good and excellent outcomes were achieved in > 75% of cohorts in most studies and redislocations were < 10%, with or without the association of the MPFL. An exception was one study that reported a high failure rate of 82%. Results were consistent across different techniques. The median CMS for the articles was 66 out of 100 (range 30-85).

Across different techniques, the outcomes are good with low rates of recurrence, with one article reporting a high rate of recurrence. Quality of the articles is variable, from low to high. Randomized control trials are needed for a better understanding of the indications, surgical techniques, and clinical outcomes. This systematic review suggests that the reconstruction of the MPTL leads to favorable clinical outcomes and supports the role of the procedure as a valid surgical patellar stabilization procedure.

IV: systematic review of level I-IV studies.

Quantification of the biomechanical properties of each individual medial patellar ligament will facilitate an understanding of injury patterns and enhance anatomic reconstruction techniques by improving the selection of grafts possessing appropriate biomechanical properties for each ligament.

To determine the ultimate failure load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL), and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML) to assist with selection of graft tissue for anatomic reconstructions.

Descriptive laboratory study.

Twenty-two nonpaired, fresh-frozen cadaveric knees were dissected free of all soft tissue structures except for the MPFL, MPTL, and MPML. Two specimens were ultimately excluded because their medial structure fibers were lacerated during dissection. The patella was obliquely cut to test the MPFL and the MPTL-MPML complex separately. To ensure that the common patellar insertion of the MPTL and MPML was not compromised during testing, only one each of the MPML and MPTL were tested per specimen (n = 10 each). Specimens were secured in a dynamic tensile testing machine, and the ultimate load, stiffness, and mechanism of failure of each ligament (MPFL = 20, MPML = 10, and MPTL = 10) were recorded.

The mean ± SD ultimate load of the MPFL (178 ± 46 N) was not significantly greater than that of the MPTL (147 ± 80 N; P = .706) but was significantly greater than that of the MPML (105 ± 62 N; P = .001). The mean ultimate load of the MPTL was not significantly different from that of the MPML ( P = .210). Of the 20 MPFLs tested, 16 failed by midsubstance rupture and 4 by bony avulsion on the femur. Of the 10 MPTLs tested, 9 failed by midsubstance rupture and 1 by bony avulsion on the patella. Finally, of the 10 MPMLs tested, all 10 failed by midsubstance rupture. No significant difference was found in mean stiffness between the MPFL (23 ± 6 N/mm²) and the MPTL (31 ± 21 N/mm²; P = .169), but a significant difference was found between the MPFL and the MPML (14 ± 8 N/mm²; P = .003) and between the MPTL and MPML ( P = .028).

The MPFL and MPTL had comparable ultimate loads and stiffness, while the MPML had lower failure loads and stiffness. Midsubstance failure was the most common type of failure; therefore, reconstruction grafts should meet or exceed the values reported herein.

For an anatomic medial-sided knee reconstruction, the individual biomechanical contributions of the medial patellar ligamentous structures (MPFL, MPTL, and MPML) need to be characterized to facilitate an optimal reconstruction design.

The purpose of this article is to review anatomical, biomechanical, and clinical data of the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL) and medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML), as well as studies focusing on the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) but with relevant data about the MPTL and MPML.

A literature search of articles specifically addressing the MPTL and/or MPML was included along with studies focusing on the MPFL but with relevant data about the MPTL and MPML.

The medial patellar ligaments responsible for maintaining the stability of the patellofemoral (PF) joint include the MPFL, the MPTL, and the MPML. The MPFL is considered the primary restraint to lateral patellar translation, while the latter two are considered secondary restraints. There is robust literature on the anatomical, imaging, and biomechanical characteristics of the MPFL, and also the clinical outcome of its injury and surgical reconstruction; much less is known about the MPTL and MPML. Isolated MPFL reconstruction has good clinical and functional outcomes, with a low failure rate when defined as frank re-dislocation. Complications, including continued episodes of patellar apprehension and subluxation, remain present in most series. In addition, the current literature primarily includes a homogeneous population with few excessive anatomic dysplastic factors. There is lack of knowledge on the role of MPTL and MPML in (potentially) aiding patella stabilization and improving clinical outcomes. Understanding the role of the medial-sided patellar ligaments, in particular the role of the secondary stabilizers, in PF function and injury will aid in this goal.

MPTL and MPML have consistent basic science literature, as well as favorable clinical outcomes of surgical patellar stabilization with reconstruction of the MPTL. However, there is much heterogeneity among clinical case series and lack of comparative studies to allow clear indication for the role of isolated or combined surgical reconstruction in patellar stabilization. Therefore, this comprehensive review helps understand the current knowledge and the possible applications in the orthopedic clinical practice.

V.

The primary goal was to describe the injury patterns in a population of primary (first time) lateral patellar dislocators (LPD) to lend clarity to commonly held notions about injury patterns in this population.

A prospective study identifying patients presenting with LPD between 2008 and 2012. Inclusion criteria were a history and physical exam consistent with primary LPD, and an MRI consistent with the diagnosis without other significant ligamentous injury. On MRI, location of cartilage, medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) injury, and bone bruising were noted. Severity was categorized as partial or complete for MPFL and cartilage lesions. Anatomic patellar instability risk factors (patella alta, trochlear dysplasia, increased TT-TG, and lateral patella tilt) were recorded and compared to the injury patterns.

This study involved 157 patients; 107 patients were skeletally mature. Of the 157 patients, 26 had surgery for this injury due to clinician-perceived need for cartilage debridement. MPFL injury severity was complete rupture (N = 69, 44%), partial (N = 67, 43%), and none (N = 19, 13%). MPFL injury location was isolated femoral (N = 16, 10%), isolated patella (N = 26, 17%), isolated mid-substance (0%), multiple locations (N = 95, 61%), and none (N = 20, 13%). Chondral injury location was patella (N = 67, 43%), lateral femoral condyle (N = 11, 7%), multiple locations (N = 53, 34%), and none (N = 26, 17%). A majority (61%) of patellar chondral lesions were at its inferomedial aspect; all medial patellar retinacular partial injuries involved the inferomedial aspect of the patella, consistent with the insertion of the medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL). Skeletally immature patients had a greater risk of isolated patellar MPFL and chondral injury. No clear relationship was found between/across the location and/or severity of bone bruising, MPFL, or chondral injury.

Underlying anatomic patellar instability risk factors defined by MRI, do not predict injury patterns. MPFL and chondral injury, as well as bone bruising, are common following LPD. The medial patellotibial ligament is torn in patellar-based medial retinacular injuries, based on MRI injury location. Skeletal immaturity plays a role in the location of the injury pattern with isolated patellar-based MPFL/chondral injury being more common in the skeletally immature patient. Sex does not appear to be a factor in injury patterns after primary LPD. Knowledge of these injury trends will help focus the clinician in injury evaluation when managing primary patellar dislocations.

Case series, Level IV.

The qualitative and quantitative anatomy of the medial patellar stabilizers has been reported; however, a quantitative analysis of the anatomic and radiographic attachments of all 4 ligaments relative to anatomic and osseous landmarks, as well as to one another, has yet to be performed.

To perform a qualitative and quantitative anatomic and radiographic evaluation of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL), medial patellotibial ligament (MPTL), medial patellomeniscal ligament (MPML), and medial quadriceps tendon femoral ligament (MQTFL) attachment sites, with attention to their relationship to pertinent osseous and soft tissue landmarks.

Descriptive laboratory study.

Ten nonpaired fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees were dissected, and the MPFL, MPTL, MPML, and MQTFL were identified. A coordinate measuring device quantified the attachment areas of each structure and its relationship to pertinent bony landmarks. Radiographic analysis was performed through ligament attachment sites and relevant anatomic structures to assess their locations relative to pertinent bony landmarks.

Four separate medial patellar ligaments were identified in all specimens. The center of the MPFL attachments was 14.3 mm proximal and 2.1 mm posterior to the medial epicondyle and 8.3 mm distal and 2.7 mm anterior to the adductor tubercle on the femur and 8.9 mm distal and 19.9 mm medial to the superior pole on the patella. The MQTFL had a mean insertion length of 29.3 mm on the medial aspect of the distal quadriceps tendon. The MPTL and MPML shared a common patellar insertion and were 9.1 mm proximal and 15.4 mm medial to the inferior pole. The MPTL attachment inserted on a newly identified bony ridge, which was located 5.0 mm distal to the joint line. The orientation angles of the MPTL and MPML with respect to the patellar tendon were 8.3° and 22.7°, respectively.

The most important findings of this study were the correlative anatomy of 4 distinct medial patellar ligaments (MPFL, MPTL, MPML, MQTFL), as well as the identification of a bony ridge on the medial proximal tibia that consistently served as the attachment site for the MPTL. The quantitative and radiographic measurements, while comparable with current literature, detailed the meniscal insertion of the MPML and defined a patellar insertion of the MPTL and the MPML as a single attachment. The data allow for reproducible landmarks to be established from previously known bony and soft tissue structures.

The findings of this study provide the anatomic foundation needed for an improved understanding of the role of medial-sided patellar restraints. This will help to further refine injury patterns and/or soft tissue deficiencies that result in lateral patellar instability, which can then be addressed with an anatomic-based reconstruction or repair technique and potentially lead to improved outcomes.

To describe the anatomy (quantitative macroscopic and histologic), radiographic parameters of the insertions, and biomechanical characteristics of the medial ligamentous restrictors of the patella (medial patellofemoral ligament [MPFL], medial patellotibial ligament [MPTL], and medial patellomeniscal ligament [MPML]) in cadaveric knees. Because the MPTL and the MPML are not as well known as the MPFL, they were the focus of this study.

MPFLs, MPTLs, and MPMLs from 9 knees were dissected. Histologic evaluations were conducted. Length, width, and insertion relations with anatomic references were determined. Metallic spheres were introduced into the insertion points of each ligament, and anteroposterior and lateral radiographs were taken. The distances of the insertions from the baselines were measured on radiographs. Tensile tests of the ligaments were performed.

All the samples showed dense connective tissue characteristic of ligaments. The MPTL was inserted into the proximal tibia (13.7 mm distal to the joint line) and in the distal end of the patella (3.6 mm proximal to the distal border). The MPTL had a length of 36.4 mm and a width of 7.1 mm. The MPML was inserted into the medial meniscus and distally in the patella (5.7 mm proximal to the distal border). Per radiography, on the anteroposterior view, the tibial insertion of the MPTL was 9.4 mm distal to the joint line and in line with the medial border of the medial spine. On the lateral view, the patellar insertions of the MPTL and MPML were 4.8 and 6.6 mm proximal to its distal border, respectively. The MPTL was stiffer than the MPFL (17.0 N/mm vs 8.0 N/mm, P = .024) and showed less deformation in the maximum tensile strength (8.6 mm vs 19.3 mm, P = .005).

The MPTL inserts into the proximal tibia and into the distal pole of the patella. The MPML inserts into the medial meniscus and into the distal pole of the patella. They present with identifiable anatomic and radiographic parameters. Grafts commonly used for ligament reconstructions should be adequate for reconstruction of the MPTL.

The study contributes to the anatomic, radiographic, and biomechanical knowledge of the MPTL to improve the outcomes of its reconstruction.