Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia, associated with substantial morbidity and a reduced quality of life. The current standard of care, transcatheter pulmonary vein isolation using thermal ablation techniques, provides symptom relief but carries a risk of collateral tissue damage. In recent years, pulsed field ablation, a nonthermal technique based on irreversible electroporation, has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional thermal ablation methods.

This review provides an overview of pulsed field ablation, a novel nonthermal ablation technique. We briefly explain its biophysical principles and general technical aspects, describe currently available technologies, and summarize findings from clinical studies. Additionally, we discuss its safety profile, unresolved issues, and limitations, while also exploring future perspectives.

Pulsed field ablation offers distinct advantages over traditional thermal ablation methods, such as shorter procedure times and a favorable safety profile due to precise tissue targeting. Future improvements in ablation device design, energy delivery settings, integration with mapping systems, workflow efficiency, ablation protocols, and patient selection criteria are expected to further enhance clinical outcomes.

Data on long-term effects of catheter ablation vs antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and atrial fibrillation (AF) burden are limited.

The study aimed to assess long-term HRQoL and rhythm data in patients with symptomatic AF.

The 75 patients who underwent ablation and 74 receiving AADs in the Catheter Ablation compared with Pharmacological Therapy for Atrial Fibrillation (CAPTAF) trial were followed for 48 months. The General Health subscale of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey, time to first AF episode ≥1 hour, and AF burden, recorded by implantable cardiac monitors, were compared.

One hundred forty-seven patients completed follow-up, with 7 crossovers in the ablation group and 34 crossovers in the AAD group. General Health improved by ablation from a median of 62 points at baseline to 79.2 points at follow-up (P < .001) and by AADfrom a median of 67 to 77 points (P < .001), without treatment differences (P = .77). Time to first AF episode ≥1 hour was longer (median 257 days in the ablation group vs 180 days in the AAD group; P = .025). The cumulative AF burden during follow-up was lower in the ablation group (median 0.3%; interquartile range [IQR] 0%-1.4%) than in the AAD group (1.6%; IQR 0.1%-11.0%); P = .01. The cumulative reduction in AF burden compared with baseline was greater in the ablation group (median -89.5%; IQR -98.4% to -51.3%) than in the AAD group (-52.7%; IQR -92.6% to 263.6%); P < .001.

HRQoL improvement in long-term did not differ between ablation and AAD groups despite a larger reduction in AF burden after ablation. The results should be interpreted in the light of a high crossover rate in the AAD group.

Patients who have undergone catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) may experience recurrence of this condition. The efficacy of sacubitril-valsartan (S/V) in preventing AF recurrence compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) is not established. This meta-analysis aimed to establish the best therapeutic choice for preventing AF recurrence after catheter ablation.

A systematic search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies comparing the use of S/V with ACEI/ARB in patients who underwent catheter ablation. Results are presented as mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed with the I2 statistic, and outcomes are expressed as relative risk (RR). R software version 4.2.3 was used for the analysis.

Three RCTs and one cohort study, comprising 642 patients with 319 patients in the S/V group and 323 in the control group, were included. Follow-up ranged from 6 to 36 months, with mean ages ranging from 58.9 to 65.8 years. A significant reduction in persistent AF occurrence was demonstrated favoring the S/V group (RR: 0.54; 95% CI: [0.41, 0.70]; p = 0.000004; I2: 80%) over the ACEI/ARB group. There was no significant difference in left ventricular ejection fraction with S/V use (MD: 1.23; 95% CI: [-0.12, 2.60]; p = 0.076; I2: 0%) compared with ACEI/ARB. The analysis also showed a significant reduction in left atrial volume index (MD: -5.33; 95% CI: [-8.76, -1.90]; p = 0.002; I2: 57%) in the S/V group compared with the ACEI/ARB group.

This meta-analysis demonstrated the efficacy of S/V in reducing the incidence of AF in patients undergoing catheter ablation compared with the use of ACEI/ARB. However, more RCTs are needed for a comprehensive evaluation of its efficacy in reducing AF recurrence after catheter ablation in clinical practice.

Atrial fibrillation is the most prevalent sustained arrhythmia worldwide and is expected to increase substantially within the coming years. Although lifestyle changes and risk factor modification are now acknowledged as central components of atrial fibrillation management, the effects of exercise on disease-specific outcomes are still not extensively documented due to few high-quality randomised trials. The primary objective of the Norwegian Exercise in Atrial Fibrillation Trial (NEXAF) is to assess the effects of exercise over 12 months on key clinical and patient-reported outcomes in previously inactive patients with atrial fibrillation.

NEXAF is a multicentre, two-arm, randomised controlled trial inviting patients 18-80 years with a confirmed diagnosis of paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Eligible patients are randomised 1:1 to either a combined supervised and eHealth-based exercise intervention or usual care for 12 months. The primary outcomes are total time in atrial fibrillation measured by insertable cardiac monitors, and disease-specific quality of life measured by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life questionnaire.

Ethical approval was obtained from the Regional Ethics Committee in Mid-Norway in April 2021 (ID 213848).

NCT05164718.

Evidence suggests a benefit of a rhythm control approach in patients with a recent diagnosis of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study sought to evaluate clinical characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes in patients with first diagnosed AF (FDAF) undergoing a non-invasive rhythm control strategy in an emergency department (ED).

This analysis uses data from the Heidelberg Registry of Atrial Fibrillation (HERA-FIB). HERA-FIB is a retrospective single-centre observational study which consecutively included patients presenting to the ED of the University Hospital of Heidelberg between June 2009 and March 2020 with a sequential follow-up for all-cause mortality, stroke, major bleeding events and myocardial infarction (MI). Outcomes of patients with FDAF were related to treatment strategy (non-invasive rhythm vs. rate control).

Among the 2,758 (27%) patients who presented with FDAF, a non-implementation of a non-invasive rhythm control strategy at admission was observed in 75.4% and associated with an excess of all-cause mortality hazard ratio (HR): 1.61 (95%CI 1.30-1.99), p < 0.0001 and incident MI HR: 1.88 (95% CI 1.22-2.90), p = 0.0043 during follow-up. The non-implementation of a non-invasive rhythm control remained an independent predictor for all-cause mortality and MI even after adjustment for significant univariate variables with an adjusted HR of 1.52 (95%CI: 1.14-2.04, p = 0.0043) and 1.89 (95%CI: 1.03-3.45, p = 0.0392), respectively.

Real-world data from FDAF patients presenting to an ED showed a benefit regarding all-cause mortality and MI favouring a non-invasive rhythm control strategy. Further prospective research is needed to validate this hypothesis.

The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05995561.

Convincing evidence for the efficacy of ablation as first-line therapy in paroxysmal AF (PAF) and its clear superiority to medical therapy for rhythm control in both PAF and persistent AF (PsAF) has generated considerable interest in the optimal timing of ablation. Based on this data, there is a widespread view that the principle of 'the earlier the better' should be generally applied. However, the natural history of AF is highly variable and non-linear, and for this reason, it is difficult to be emphatic that all patients are best served by ablation early after their initial AF episodes. Sufficient evidence exists to indicate a conservative approach is reasonable in patients with infrequent and non-progressive episodes (i.e. absence of progressive increase in burden culminating in PsAF) in whom symptoms remain mild and well-controlled. A conservative management phase should be marked by assiduous attention to risk factor modification, changes in frequency and duration of AF episodes, and patient preferences. If and when AF does begin to progress, accumulating evidence indicates that early ablation accompanied by ongoing attention to risk factors provides the best outcomes.

An early rhythm control strategy is the preferred management for patients newly diagnosed with atrial fibrillation (AF). A rhythm control strategy, however, has been historically underused for patients from underrepresented racial and ethnic groups (UREGs).

We aimed to determine whether disparities in rhythm control are present at the initial diagnosis with AF.

We used the Get With the Guidelines (GWTG)-Atrial Fibrillation registry to compare the use of a rhythm control strategy among patients with different racial and ethnic backgrounds hospitalized with a new diagnosis of AF from January 2013 through December 2023.

Among 21,567 patients hospitalized for newly detected AF across 249 hospitals, 17,659 patients (81.9%) identified as non-Hispanic White (NHW), 1,860 patients (8.6%) identified as Black, 1,232 patients (5.7%) identified as Hispanic, and 255 patients (1.2%) identified as Asian. After adjusting for age, sex, and year of presentation, NHW patients were more likely to receive rhythm control (odds ratio [OR], 1.19 [1.07, 1.33], P = .0013) compared with non-White patients at the time of initial diagnosis with AF. Black patients were less likely to receive rhythm control compared with all other racial and ethnic groups (OR, 0.80 [0.71, 0.91], P = .0005). These differences persisted after fully adjusting for demographic characteristics, clinical variables, hospital characteristics, and socioeconomic factors.

Differences in rhythm management exist amongst patients from different racial and ethnic groups. Efforts to mitigate disparities in AF management should include an emphasis on rhythm control at the time of initial diagnosis.

Background: Arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC) is a relatively common yet poorly understood cardiac condition that occurs when arrhythmias cause left ventricular systolic dysfunction, which can be reversed with the resolution of the arrhythmia. Catheter ablation serves as a cornerstone treatment for eliminating the arrhythmic trigger. However, the variability in left ventricular recovery following ablation highlights the need to identify reliable predictors of reverse remodeling. Methods: This review explores key studies on AIC patients undergoing catheter ablation, primarily derived from observational cohorts, to identify significant predictors of left ventricular function recovery. Results: While echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging remain the primary diagnostic modalities, additional insights have emerged from electrocardiograms and laboratory biomarkers. Despite these advancements, a comprehensive framework for identifying optimal candidates for ablation remains lacking. Conclusions: By synthesizing existing evidence, this review aims to pinpoint the most robust predictors of systolic recovery in AIC patients following ablation.

The impact of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) on the outcomes of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) remains unclear. While the effects of mitral regurgitation (MR) on PVI outcomes are well-documented, there are limited data on how moderate or greater TR influences PVI efficacy and recurrence rates.

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of moderate or greater TR on the outcomes of PVI, particularly focusing on AF recurrence rates within the first year post-PVI.

We conducted an observational cohort study involving 421 patients undergoing their first PVI. 96 patients with moderate or greater TR were propensity score-matched with 96 controls based on age, sex, body mass index, and MR severity. Procedural parameters, complication rates, and AF recurrence within 1-year post-PVI were analyzed.

Despite comparable procedural parameters and low overall complication rates between the groups, patients with moderate or greater TR experienced significantly higher AF recurrence rates within the first year after PVI. Right atrium (RA) area was notably larger in these patients, suggesting a potential link between RA remodeling and increased AF recurrence.

Our findings indicate that moderate or greater TR is associated with higher recurrence rates of AF after PVI, potentially due to RA enlargement and remodeling. This highlights the need for tailored ablation strategies that consider the RA substrate and/or TR treatment in patients with significant TR and AF. Further multicenter, prospective studies are required to validate these results and explore long-term outcomes.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with adverse remodeling of the left atrium (LA). The impact of the extent of atrial myopathy and post-ablation remodeling on quality-of-life (QoL) outcomes has not been studied.

The aim of our study was to investigate the association between atrial myopathy and post-ablation remodeling on quality-of-life outcomes in patients with persistent AF.

We conducted an analysis of DECAAF II participants who underwent late-gadolinium enhancement MRI (LGE-MRI) before and after AF ablation. We assessed atrial myopathy and post-ablation atrial remodeling, scar formation, and fibrosis coverage with ablation. QoL metrics were assessed using the Short Form Survey (SF-36) and Atrial Fibrillation Severity Scale (AFSS). Uni- and multivariable regression models were developed for this analysis.

Six hundred thirteen patients with persistent AF were included in our analyses. At baseline, AFSS burden and total AFSS score were 18.94 ± 7.35 and 12.24 ± 8.17, respectively. Following ablation, all QoL and AFSS metrics improved in both the pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and MRI-guided fibrosis ablation groups. On average, one unit of post-ablation reduction in left atrial volume index (LAVI) was associated with an improvement of 0.085 in total AFSS score (p = 0.001), 0.01 in shortness of breath with activity (p < 0.001), 0.15 in AF burden (p < 0.001), - 0.016 in global well-being (p = 0.018), 0.519 in health change (p < 0.001), 0.19 in vitality (vitality (p = 0.01), and 0.27 in physical functioning (p = 0.001). Baseline fibrosis and residual fibrosis post-ablation were associated with improved vitality and general health.

Atrial myopathy and post-ablation atrial remodeling significantly impact QoL in patients with persistent AF undergoing ablation.

Catheter-based electrical posterior box isolation (POBI) and circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (CPVI) do not improve the rhythmic outcomes of atrial fibrillation catheter ablation in previous studies with 12 to 24 months of follow-up.

The authors analyzed the long-term rhythm outcomes of our 4 previously conducted randomized controlled trials comparing CPVI alone vs CPVI plus additional POBI using the intention-to-treat principle.

The authors analyzed 575 AF patients included in our 4 previous randomized controlled trials. We compared clinical recurrence defined as recurrent atrial arrhythmia after the index procedure. In patients who underwent a repeat procedure because of recurrence after the index procedure, the mechanism of recurrence was analyzed.

After a median follow-up of 48 months, there were no significant differences in the clinical recurrence or major adverse cardiac events between the CPVI alone and CPVI plus POBI groups. The procedure time was significantly longer, and the atrial tachycardia recurrence rate was higher in the CPVI plus POBI group. In the patients who experienced clinical recurrence, there were no significant differences in the rates of cardioversion or need for repeat procedures between the groups. In patients who underwent a repeat procedure because of recurrence after the index procedure (n = 64), the pulmonary vein reconnection rate did not differ, but re-entrant atrial tachycardia was more common in the CPVI plus POBI group, while extrapulmonary vein triggers were more common in the CPVI alone group.

The addition of POBI to CPVI did not improve the long-term rhythm outcomes in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation. (The Evaluation for Prognostic Factors After Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation, NCT02138695; Evaluation of Proper Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Strategy for the Patients Who Were Changed to Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation From Persistent Atrial Fibrillation, NCT02176616; Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation Alone Versus Linear Ablation in Addition to Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Catheter Ablation in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial, NCT02721121; Comparison of Circumferential Pulmonary Vein Isolation and Complex Pulmonary Vein Isolation Additional Linear Ablation for Recurred Atrial Fibrillation After Previous Catheter Ablation: Prospective Randomized Trial [RILI Trial]; NCT02747498.

Traditionally, amiodarone or electrical cardioversion was used if radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) could not terminate atrial fibrillation during the procedure in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF).

To investigate whether the nifekalant instead of amiodarone during RFCA improve procedure outcomes in patients with PeAF.

This study enrolled patients with PeAF who failed to achieve cardioversion after initial ablation at our center between January 2020 and December 2022. These patients were classified into the nifekalant (N) group and the amiodarone (A) group. And patients were followed for 1 year to evaluate long-term success rates. Subgroup analyses and the logistic regression analyses were performed.

The study comprised 300 participants and included N (n = 121) and A (n = 179) groups. Following propensity score matching (PSM), 101 participants were in each group. Within the N and A groups, 57(56.44 %) and 19(18.81 %) cases successfully terminated AF, 45 (44.56 %) and 15(14.85 %) cases achieved conversion to atrial tachycardia (P < 0.001), respectively. The ventricular tachycardia was observed in only one case in the N group (P > 0.05). The follow-up results demonstrated that one-year success rates were 63.37 % and 49.50 % for the N and A groups (P < 0.05).

For patients with PeAF that persists after initial catheter ablation, compared to amiodarone, administration of nifekalant could convert atrial fibrillation into atrial tachycardia, following by target ablation, has the potential to improve the procedure outcomes.

Few clinical studies of atrial fibrillation (AF) have focused on Asian patients; data are lacking on current mapping and ablation strategies in the Asia Pacific region (APAC).

The HD Mapping Observational Study (NCT04022954) was designed to characterize electroanatomic mapping (EAM) with market-released high-density mapping (HDM) catheters in subjects with AF in APAC.

Subjects undergoing HDM and indicated for radiofrequency ablation (RFA) to treat AF were prospectively enrolled in APAC. Data included mapping strategy and ablation targets. EAM was performed using one of two commercially available HDM catheters (Advisor™ HD Grid, Sensor Enabled™, Abbott [GRID] or Inquiry™ AFocus II™ Double Loop, Abbott [DL]). Procedure-related adverse events were collected.

Two hundred subjects were enrolled at 15 centers: 164 with symptomatic paroxysmal (PAF) and 36 with symptomatic persistent (PersAF) AF for de novo ablation. GRID and DL were used in 186 and 14 cases, respectively. All subjects underwent voltage mapping, with conservative thresholds (low voltage ≤0.5 mV and very low voltage/electrical scar ≤0.1 mV) used in 60.2% and 35.4% of maps, respectively. Focal impulses, rotors, complex fractionated electrograms, and other substrate targets were each searched for in <3% of subjects. Median time to generate a map was 9.0 (Q1: 5.0, Q3: 13.0) minutes. Ablation strategy included pulmonary vein (PV) isolation in all, and non-PV triggers in 75/200 (37.5%) subjects. Five serious adverse events were reported.

The study demonstrated an efficient strategy with the feasibility and safety of using HDM during AF ablation procedures in APAC.

In the US, approximately 10.55 million adults have atrial fibrillation (AF). AF is associated with significantly increased risk of stroke, heart failure, myocardial infarction, dementia, chronic kidney disease, and mortality.

Symptoms of AF include palpitations, dyspnea, chest pain, presyncope, exertional intolerance, and fatigue, although approximately 10% to 40% of people with AF are asymptomatic. AF can be detected incidentally during clinical encounters, with wearable devices, or through interrogation of cardiac implanted electronic devices. In patients presenting with ischemic stroke without diagnosed AF, an implantable loop recorder (ie, subcutaneous telemetry device) can evaluate patients for intermittent AF. The 2023 American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Clinical Pharmacy (ACCP)/Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) Guideline writing group proposed 4 stages of AF evolution: stage 1, at risk, defined as patients with AF-associated risk factors (eg, obesity, hypertension); stage 2, pre-AF, signs of atrial pathology on electrocardiogram or imaging without AF; stage 3, the presence of paroxysmal (recurrent AF episodes lasting ≤7 days) or persistent (continuous AF episode lasting >7 days) AF subtypes; and stage 4, permanent AF. Lifestyle and risk factor modification, including weight loss and exercise, to prevent AF onset, recurrence, and complications are recommended for all stages. In patients with estimated risk of stroke and thromboembolic events of 2% or greater per year, anticoagulation with a vitamin K antagonist or direct oral anticoagulant reduces stroke risk by 60% to 80% compared with placebo. In most patients, a direct oral anticoagulant, such as apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban, is recommended over warfarin because of lower bleeding risks. Compared with anticoagulation, aspirin is associated with poorer efficacy and is not recommended for stroke prevention. Early rhythm control with antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation to restore and maintain sinus rhythm is recommended by the 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for some patients with AF. Catheter ablation is first-line therapy in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF to improve symptoms and slow progression to persistent AF. Catheter ablation is also recommended for patients with AF who have heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) to improve quality of life, left ventricular systolic function, and cardiovascular outcomes, such as rates of mortality and heart failure hospitalization.

AF is associated with increased rates of stroke, heart failure, and mortality. Lifestyle and risk factor modification are recommended to prevent AF onset, recurrence, and complications, and oral anticoagulants are recommended for those with an estimated risk of stroke or thromboembolic events of 2% or greater per year. Early rhythm control using antiarrhythmic drugs or catheter ablation is recommended in select patients with AF experiencing symptomatic paroxysmal AF or HFrEF.

Treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) with catheter ablation (CA) has evolved significantly. However, real-world data on long-term outcomes are limited, particularly in low- and middle-income countries.

This multicenter prospective cohort of consecutive patients aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of first-time CA for AF in Southern Brazil from 2009 to 2024.

The primary outcome was any atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATA) recurrence. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model assessed independent predictors of recurrence.

Among 1,043 patients (mean age 67.3 ± 11.3 years, 27.9% female), 75.5% had paroxysmal AF. At a median follow-up of 1.4 (1.0 - 3.4) years, 21.4% had ATA recurrence. Recurrence rates were 18.6% for paroxysmal and 29.8% for persistent AF, and 67.3% of events occurred within the first year after CA. Predictors of recurrence were persistent AF at baseline (hazard ratio [HR] 1.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.15-2.13; p = 0.004), enlargement of left atrial diameter (HR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05; p = 0.033), and higher EHRA score of AF symptoms (HR 1.60, 95% CI 1.18-2.18; p = 0.003). Recurrence rates decreased over time according to the procedure's calendar year, with a 9% relative reduction per consecutive year (HR 0.91; p < 0.001). There was a 2.1% rate of procedure-related adverse events.

In the largest cohort study of consecutive AF ablations in Latin America, predictors of ATA recurrence were related to later stages of AF. Complication and recurrence rates were comparable to those in high-income countries, underscoring the global applicability of CA for AF management.

Use of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) to treat atrial fibrillation continues to increase. Despite great interest in leveraging administrative data for real-world analyses, contemporary procedural codes for identifying PVI have not been evaluated.

In this observational retrospective cohort study, inpatient PVIs were identified among US Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code 93656 in Carrier Line Files. Each patient was matched with their claims from Medicare Provider Analysis and Review to compare CPT with International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Procedure Coding System (ICD-10-PCS) claims submitted by health care facilities to bill for PVIs. We performed the reverse for commonly matched ICD-10-PCS codes, to identify corresponding CPT-billed procedures. Finally, we reviewed institutional cases for additional comparison of CPT and ICD-10-PCS assignation for PVI. We identified 25 617 inpatient PVIs from January 2017 to December 2021, of which 18 165 (71%) were linked to Medicare Provider Analysis and Review. Of these, 16 672 (92%) were billed as ICD-10-PCS 02583ZZ: "Destruction of Conduction Mechanism, Percutaneous Approach." The reverse process yielded heterogeneous results: among 75 003 procedures billed as ICD-10-PCS 02583ZZ, only 15 691 (21%) matched with CPT 93656 (PVI), as several other unrelated procedures were billed under this ICD-10-PCS code. Institutional case review confirmed the greater specificity of CPT codes.

The ICD-10-PCS code associated with CPT-billed PVI procedures actually referred to ablation of the atrioventricular junction. Yet this ICD-10-PCS code also matched with a wide range of other procedures distinct from PVI. We conclude that ICD-10-PCS codes alone are not sensitive nor specific for identifying PVI in claims and cannot be reliably used in isolation for health services research on this important procedure.

Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is commonly incorporated into catheter ablation (CA) strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in an attempt to improve outcomes. In the CAPLA randomized study, adjunctive PWI did not improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia at 12 months compared with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) alone. Whether additional PWI reduces arrhythmia recurrence over the longer term remains unknown.

In this multi-centre, international, randomized study patients with persistent AF undergoing index CA using radiofrequency were randomized to PVI + PWI vs. PVI alone. Patients underwent regular follow-up including rhythm monitoring for a minimum of 3 years after CA. Atrial fibrillation burden at 3 years after ablation was evaluated with either 28-day continuous ambulatory electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring, twice daily single-lead ECG or from cardiac implanted device. Evaluated endpoints included freedom from any documented atrial arrhythmia recurrence after a single procedure, AF burden, need for redo CA, rhythm at last clinical follow-up, healthcare utilization metrics, and AF-related quality of life.

Three hundred thirty-three of 338 (98.5%) patients (mean age 64.3 ± 9.4 years, 23% female) completed 3-year follow-up, with 169 patients randomized to PVI + PWI and 164 patients to PVI alone. At a median of 3.62 years after index ablation, freedom from recurrent atrial arrhythmia occurred in 59 patients (35.5%) randomized to PVI + PWI vs. 68 patients (42.1%) randomized to PVI alone (hazard ratio 1.15, 95% confidence interval 0.88-1.51, P = .55). Median time to recurrent atrial arrhythmia was 0.53 years (interquartile range 0.34-1.01 years). Redo ablation was performed in 54 patients (32.0%) in the PVI + PWI group vs. 49 patients (29.9%, P = .68) in the PVI alone group. Pulmonary vein reconnection was present in 54.5% (mean number of reconnected PVs 2.2 ± .9) and posterior wall reconnection in 75%. Median AF burden at 3 years was 0% in both groups (interquartile range 0%-0.85% PVI + PWI vs. 0%-1.43% PVI alone, P = .49). Sinus rhythm at final clinical follow-up was present in 85.1% with PVI + PWI vs. 87.1% with PVI alone (P = .60). Mean AF Effect On Quality-Of-Life (AFEQT) score at 3 years after ablation was 88.0 ± 14.8 with PVI + PWI vs. 88.9 ± 15.4 with PVI alone (P = .63).

In patients with persistent AF, the addition of PWI to PVI alone at index radiofrequency CA did not significantly improve freedom from atrial arrhythmia recurrence at long-term follow-up. Median AF burden remains low and AF quality of life high at 3 years with either ablation strategy.

The present study reviews the role of catheter ablation (CA) in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF), a widespread arrhythmia associated with increased morbidity and mortality. The present review explores current indications and recent evidence supporting CA, assessing patient outcomes and identifying common complications associated with the procedure. Emphasis is placed on optimizing risk factors prior to ablation, including weight control and hypertension management, as these measures can significantly enhance post-procedural outcomes. The present review also discusses the use of antiarrhythmic and anticoagulant therapies following CA to minimize recurrence and reduce stroke risk. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of CA is discussed, comparing its long-term economic impact with that of medical therapy alone. The present comprehensive review provides insight into best practices for AF management, supporting CA as a promising approach when integrated with targeted lifestyle modifications and pharmacological support for improved, patient-centered outcomes.

While there are several completed clinical trials that address treatment strategies in patients with symptomatic and recurrent atrial fibrillation (AF), there are no randomized clinical trials that address first-line rhythm control of new-onset AF. Recent data suggest that early initiation of rhythm control within 1 year can improve outcomes.

In this open-label pragmatic clinical trial nested within the Get with The Guidelines Atrial Fibrillation registry, approximately 3,000 patients with first-detected AF will be enrolled at approximately 200 sites. Participants will be randomized (1:1) to treatment with dronedarone in addition to usual care versus usual care alone. The primary endpoint will be time to first cardiovascular (CV) hospitalization or death from any cause through 12 months from randomization. Secondary endpoints will include a WIN ratio (all-cause death, ischemic stroke or systemic embolism, heart failure hospitalization, acute coronary hospitalization), CV hospitalization, and all-cause mortality. Patient reported outcomes will be analyzed based on change in Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life (AFEQT) and change in Mayo AF-Specific Symptom Inventory (MAFSI) from baseline to 12 months.

CHANGE AFIB will determine if treatment with dronedarone in addition to usual care is superior to usual care alone for the prevention of CV hospitalization or death from any cause in patients with first-detected AF. The trial will also determine whether initiation of rhythm control at the time of first-detected AF affects CV events or improves patient reported outcomes.

- NCT05130268.

Cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling has been reported to play an important role in the recurrence of atrial fibrillation after radiofrequency ablation, which significantly affects the long-term efficacy of this procedure. lncRNAs have been shown to interact in the pathological processes underlying heart diseases. However, the roles and mechanisms of lncRNAs in cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling during atrial fibrillation reduction after ganglionated plexus ablation remain unknown.

The aim of this study was to investigate the mechanism by which lncRNA- 056298 modulates GAP43 to affect cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling and facilitate the induction of atrial fibrillation after ganglionated plexus ablation.

A canine model of right atrial ganglionated plexus ablation was established. The atrial electrophysiological characteristics and neural markers were detected before and after 6 months of ganglionated plexus ablation. High-throughput sequencing was used to screen differentially expressed lncRNAs in target atrial tissues, and lncRNA- 056298 was selected to further explore its effects and mechanisms on cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling.

The induction rate of atrial fibrillation increased in dogs after ganglionated plexus ablation. Overexpression of lncRNA-056298 by lentivirus can shorten the atrial effective refractory period and increase the induction of atrial fibrillation. lncRNA- 056298 promoted cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling via endogenous competition with cfa-miR-185 to induce transcription of its target gene GAP43, thereby affecting the induction of atrial fibrillation.

lncRNA-056298 regulates GAP43 by sponging miR-185, which affects cardiac intrinsic autonomic nerve remodelling and mediates atrial fibrillation induction after ganglionated plexus ablation.

Aim: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation (CA) is a mainstay treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). RF catheters with contact force (CF) sensing technology and electroanatomical mapping systems enable real-time assessment of catheter tip-tissue interface CF, facilitating individualized and precise CA. This study examined inpatient hospital readmissions in patients with AF treated with THERMOCOOL™ ST/ THERMOCOOL™ STSF catheter with the CARTO™ 3 System versus TactiCath™ catheter with the EnSite™ System. Materials & methods: Patients undergoing CA for AF between 1 July 2019 to 30 November 2021 were identified from the Premier Healthcare Database and grouped based on use of THERMOCOOL ST/STSF or TactiCath™. Study outcomes were all-cause, cardiovascular (CV)-, and AF-related inpatient readmission at 91-365-day post-CA. Inverse probability of treatment weighting of propensity scores balanced baseline patient, comorbidity and hospital characteristics. A weighted generalized estimating equation (GEE) model examined differences in readmission outcomes. Results: A total of 15,518 patients met inclusion criteria (THERMOCOOL ST/STSF, n = 13,001; TactiCath™, n = 2517). Patient characteristics were generally well-balanced after weighting. Patients treated with THERMOCOOL ST/STSF + CARTO 3 had a 20% lower likelihood of all-cause inpatient readmissions (7.8 vs 9.3%, chi-square p = 0.041; odds ratio [OR]: 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.66-0.96, GEE p = 0.019) and a 21% lower likelihood of CV-related inpatient readmission (5.2 vs 6.2%, chi-square p = 0.133, OR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.62-0.99, GEE p = 0.043) in 91-365-days post-CA versus those treated with TactiCath™ + Ensite. No significant differences were observed for AF-related readmissions. Conclusion: Patients undergoing CA for AF treated with THERMOCOOL ST/STSF + CARTO 3 had a significantly lower risk of all-cause and CV-related inpatient hospital readmission versus those treated with TactiCath™ + Ensite.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained arrhythmia, linked with a significantly heightened risk of stroke. While moderate exercise reduces AF risk, high-level endurance athletes paradoxically exhibit a higher incidence. However, their stroke risk remains uncertain due to their younger age, higher cardiovascular fitness, and lower rate of comorbidities. Several key studies highlight that AF may increase the risk of stroke in endurance athletes, particularly those over 65. However, the overall risk within this population remains relatively low. Notably, older male athletes show a higher AF incidence but experience lower stroke risk than their non-athletic counterparts. Regular physical activity prior to a first stroke appears to reduce mortality, though recurrent stroke risk in athletes with AF mirrors that of non-athletes, despite an elevated AF incidence. Management of AF in athletes is complex, with limited evidence guiding anti-thrombotic strategies. In this setting, specific recommendations are sparse, particularly in sports where bleeding risk is heightened. Individualized management, emphasizing shared decision-making, is critical to balance stroke prevention with athletic performance. Rhythm control strategies, such as catheter ablation, may be a reasonable first-line treatment option for athletes, particularly in those desiring to avoid long-term medication. This review synthesizes the current literature on the incidence, predictors, and management of stroke in athletes with AF.

Background/Objectives: Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) is a well-established therapeutic approach for maintaining sinus rhythm, though its efficacy remains suboptimal in certain patients. The left atrium (LA) volume, commonly assessed through transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), is a recognized predictor of AF recurrence after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). However, the complex three-dimensional structure of the LA makes precise measurement challenging with traditional TTE techniques. Electroanatomic mapping (EAM) offers a more accurate evaluation of LA geometry and volume, which may enhance the prediction of ablation outcomes. Methods: This prospective study included 197 patients with AF who were referred for PVI to our center (Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias, Spain) between 2016 and 2020. All participants underwent pre-ablation TTE and EAM to assess the electric active volume (EAV) of the LA. Clinical follow-up included regular Holter monitoring and electrocardiograms to detect AF recurrences. Results: The mean age was 56.3 ± 9.67 years, and 34% had persistent AF. The mean LA volumes measured by TTE and the EAV by EAM were 62.86 ± 15.58 mL and 126.75 ± 43.35 mL, respectively, with a moderate positive correlation (r = 0.49, p < 0.001). AF recurrences were observed in 51.27% of patients over a 36 ± 15-month follow-up period. Cox regression analyses (univariate and multivariate), Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were used to illustrate freedom from atrial arrhythmia during follow-up. Both EAV by EAM and TTE volumes were significant predictors of AF recurrence in the univariate analysis (HR 1.002 [1.001-1.003], p = 0.033 and HR 1.001 [1.006-1.012], p < 0.01, respectively). Among clinical variables, persistent AF was significantly associated with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 1.17 [1.096-1.268], p = 0.02). Conclusions: EAV of the LA assessment by EAM demonstrates a significant correlation with TTE measurements and is a predictor of AF post-ablation recurrence. In patients selected for catheter ablation, EAV by EAM provides additional insights that could contribute to therapeutic decision-making and risk stratification of AF recurrences.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is classified into paroxysmal, persistent, long-term persistent, and permanent types. It is commonly treated by radiofrequency ablation (RFA), which is more successful than conventional anti-arrhythmic drugs, but it is still largely unknown whether these beneficial effects are equally present for all AF types. Here, we evaluated the impact that AF type has on post-RFA patient conditions and identified underlying factors affecting AF prognoses.

Three hundred and twenty-nine AF patients who underwent RFA were retrospectively examined (221 paroxysmal, 56 persistent, 52 long-term persistent), during a post-RFA follow-up period, from 3-months to 2-years. Cardiac functional parameters, such as left atrial (LA), ventricular (LV), and pulmonary artery diameters, as well as ejection fraction (EF) and end-diastolic/systolic diameter ratio, were measured using echocardiography. Additionally, chronic kidney disease (CKD) was diagnosed among these AF patients, using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, and its impact on post-RFA patient outcomes was examined. Logistic regression analysis identified differences between AF and non-AF recurrence groups.

In terms of functional parameters, persistent AF had significantly smaller LA, and larger EF, compared to paroxysmal and long-term persistent groups, while paroxysmal had significantly larger LV versus persistent and long-term persistent after RFA. For post-RFA patient conditions, paroxysmal, compared to persistent and long-term persistent, had significantly lower AF recurrence (18.10% versus 30.36% and 36.54%) and re-hospitalization rates (6.79% versus 14.29% and 19.23%); however, no significant difference was present between the 3 groups in terms of post-operative stroke rates, as well as re-hospitalization duration. Additionally, CKD patients, versus non-CKD, were more prone to AF recurrence and re-hospitalization, being 3.268 times more likely.

AF types and CKD were independent factors influencing AF recurrence, serving as highly sensitive predictors to monitor prognoses and guide treatments. Therefore, personalized treatment regimens should be recommended for different AF patients.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is more common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and is often highly symptomatic. The impact of catheter ablation (CA) may be under-reported when evaluated by long-term freedom from any atrial arrhythmia.

This study aims to evaluate whether CA of AF in patients with HCM would significantly reduce AF burden and improve symptoms.

A multicenter registry was established to enroll HCM patients with pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic devices undergoing CA of AF between 2017 and 2021. The first AF recurrence and burden 12 months before and after CA were determined.

A total of 81 HCM patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices underwent CA of AF. Patients were followed-up for a minimum of 1-year (35 [Q1-Q3: 23-50] months). AF was paroxysmal in 38 of 81 (46.9%) patients and burden pre-CA was 27.0% (Q1-Q3: 3.0% to 99.0%). A total of 35 (43.2%) patients had AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence within 12 months. AF burden reduced after CA to 0.5% (Q1-Q3 range: 0.0% to 11.1%) (P = 0.001); a 95% CI (13.8% to 100%) relative reduction. European Hearth Rhythm Association class improved by 1.8 ± 1.3 classes (P < 0.001). Of those with AF/atrial tachycardia recurrence, the reduction in AF burden was -33.7% (Q1-Q3: -88.9% to -13.8%) (P < 0.001) and 20 (57.1%) patients reported symptomatic improvement by ≥1 European Hearth Rhythm Association class. AF burden reduction was associated with symptomatic improvement. (r = -0.67; P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is common after CA in HCM patients, but this may under-represent the impact of CA in this cohort. CA significantly reduced AF burden and improved symptoms. A comprehensive evaluation of AF burden, symptoms, and hard endpoints is needed to determine the utility of CA in this context.

pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) improves health-related quality of life (QoL). This study compares QoL improvement after radiofrequency ablation (RF) and cryoballoon ablation (cryo) and assesses additional ablations' role in QoL improvement.

we evaluated the QoL of consecutive patients with first-time RF and cryo for PAF between January 2017 and June 2019. A combined EQ-VAS, AFEQT, and EQ-5D-3L paper questionnaire was sent to patients at baseline, 12, and 30 months after the procedure. Procedure and patient details were collected from medical notes.

the analysis included 207 patients, of which 127 (61%) had RF and 144 (70%) were males. RF patients had more additional ablations (52 [41%] versus 22 [28%], p = 0.01). There was a significant improvement from baseline to 12 months post-RF in AFEQT (43 ± 9 to 83 ± 7.8, p < 0.001), EQ-5D-3L (-0.01 ± 0.01 to 1.1 ± 0.02, p < 0.001), and EQ-VAS (51 ± 8 to 77 ± 13, p = 0.01). Similarly, an improvement at 12 months was observed after cryo in AFEQT (55 ± 11 to 77 ± 9, p < 0.001), EQ-5D-3L (-0.04 ± 0.03 to 1.3 ± 0.03, p < 0.001), and EQ-VAS (56 ± 7 to 85 ± 9, p = 0.01). QoL improvement was similar between RF and cryo. Additional ablations provided no additional QoL improvement compared to patients with PVI alone.

Patients undergoing first-time PVI for PAF, RF, and cryo showed similar QoL improvement at 12 months, which was sustained at 30 months. Additional ablations did not provide further QoL benefits.