Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 116174
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.116174
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.116174
Table 1 Characteristics of the included studies
| Ref. | Comparison | Disposable cap (n) | Standard (n) |
| Ridtitid et al[16], 2020 | Disposable distal cap vs standard duodenoscope | 54 | 54 |
| Ridtitid et al[6], 2022 | Disposable distal cap vs standard duodenoscope | 200 | 200 |
| Forbes et al[7], 2023 | Disposable distal cap vs standard duodenoscope | 208 | 214 |
| Ridtitid et al[17], 2025 | Disposable distal cap vs standard duodenoscope | 81 | 81 |
Table 2 Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (Rob 2) analysis of included studies
| Ref. | Bias from randomization process | Bias due to deviations from intended interventions | Bias due to missing outcome data | Bias in measurement of the outcomes | Bias in selection of the reported result | Overall risk of bias |
| Ridtitid et al[16], 2020 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Ridtitid et al[6], 2022 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Forbes et al[7], 2023 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
| Ridtitid et al[17], 2025 | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low | Low |
- Citation: Nunes BCM, Baraldo S, Duda JR, Fenelon L, Franco MC, do Carmo MCN, Diedrich DB, da Costa MCP, Kum AST. Efficacy of duodenoscope with disposable distal cap in reducing microbial contamination: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Methodol 2026; 16(3): 116174
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i3/116174.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.116174